Added: 3 years ago
From: jtyranus
Views: 151,640
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,626)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DURound is a cunt.

  • Jack Black as Jesus is win.

  • LOL "That's right, Jesus is Black" ROFL awesome

  • Whatever did happen to "separation of church and state"? I know that it was here somewhere...I just don't know where that little bugger has gone off too ;P We should probably start a search party...because I suspect foul play O-O Who's with me?

  • Separation of Church and State has long been misunderstood.

    First of all, the First Amendment ONLY says what the Federal Government CANNOT do. It does not outlaw State Religions, which continued to exist for years.

    Second, it does not outlaw religious significance in all government transactions.

    Thirdly it does not in any way prevent religion from seeking to impose its ideas upon government.

    These are three things most people who recite "separation of Church and state" do not know.

  • Well...that's very interesting...

    However...I still think that it's wrong for people to hide behind the bible when it comes to these things...from what I remember the bible spoke of love...not love for everyone except those select few that make us uncomfortable...

  • I am not sure that the people are "hiding" behind the Bible. I think that they are believing the BIble.

    There were a few founding fathers who would have disagreed with them. But most would have agreed and we still see remnants of that like Bibles in courtrooms.

    Oh.. also.. the Bible speaks of Love but it also speaks of killing and hatred. You can get what you want.

  • Most are hiding behind it, if they truly believed in it they would follow all of it's practices and not pick and choose, even the most die-hard bible clutchers don't follow it completely, just when they feel like it, if they followed everything down to a tee then we could say that they truly believe, but right now they're just using it..

    I know, I was simply stating that to point out the hypocrisy that is organized religion, they preach love, but only to those that they feel are fit to love..

  • You do not seem to understand the belief structure.

    First of all, the belief structure is NOT that you have to follow all of its practices. Instead, you can either follow those practices that are approved of in the N.T. and/or that are not condemned in the N.T.

    This is not hypocrisy. it is part of the belief system.

    You may not like people believing in the Bible but you do yourself no credit by failing to represent their views accurately.

  • Some don't even do that...they pick singular verses to follow...whenever they feel they that they help their cause...

    I'm not saying all of them are bad...but a lot of them only pick and choose...even from the New Testament...is it not hypocrisy to say one thing and then do the exact opposite? To preach love one minute and then turn around and spout hate?

  • I believe you are misrepresenting their positions, egregiously. The fact that they use ONE scripture does not mean that is the ONLY scripture that they believe.

    Why are you doing this? You may disagree with them, but to misrepresent them is simply dishonest.

    As an example they DO NOT believe in pure love. They believe in loving PEOPLE but in HATING certain actions.

    You may not be able to understand this. You may not agree with it. But that is how it is and you misrep them.

  • "They believe in loving PEOPLE but in HATING certain actions."

    Only a few that I've seen actually believe that...many of them believe that the person is the action...and hate both equally...again...I'm not saying all of them are like this...but many...at least many that I've witnessed...hate the person as much if not more than the action that the person partakes in...they may say otherwise...but their actions speak volumes...

  • I am convinced you do not know them as well as you think.

    You post as though you know the secrets of their hearts.

    Frankly I do not believe you do.

  • is it not hypocrisy to say one thing and then do the exact opposite?

    ===

    Not all hypocrisy is bad. A woman smokes. She raises her four children to NOT smoke, even while she smokes.

    She is doing one thing and telling people to do something else.

    Hypocrisy? Perhaps.. but it is A GOOD thing.

    Not all hypocrisy is bad.

  • That may be so...but it is still absurd...the woman who smokes and does not even try to stop...though she realizes it is bad...cannot expect her children to take her seriously...

  • I was referring to a woman who tried very hard to stop.

    She died of cancer. She still smoked.

    None of her children smoke.

    Sometimes hypocrisy is not bad.

  • If she was trying to stop...how is it hypocrisy? She knows that it is wrong...she is trying hard to break the bad habit...while telling her children not to smoke...using her mistake as an example maybe...not hypocrisy because she is practicing what she is preaching...

    Smoking is addictive...I know...it's not something that most people can just stop cold turkey...or if they do they have to be prepared for a lot of pain...as long as she was trying to stop...I don't consider her a hypocrite...

  • How is that hypocrisy? It is hypocrisy the same way that you described it: "hypocrisy to say one thing and then do the exact opposite". Those are your words. And they fit the definition.

    She did NOT practice what she preached. She preached NO SMOKING ... and she smoked.

    That you personally do not consider it hypocrisy does not change the definition in the dictionary. But maybe you should revise your personal definition anyway.

  • But she was trying to not smoke...she was trying to practice what she was preaching...quitting smoking is not something to be taken lightly...it's incredibly difficult...as long as she was trying to stop...it isn't really the same...if she blatantly continued smoking...without even trying to stop...then it would be...because she would be going against what she wanted her children to believe...that smoking is bad...

  • OK... so maybe the Christians you love to condemn are trying not to hate. Maybe they are practicing what they are preaching. Not hating is not something to be taken lightly. Maybe its incredibly difficult. As long as they are trying to stop it isn;t really the same. If they blatantly continued hating without even trying to stop then i twould be .... because they would be going against what they preach ... that hating is bad.

  • Well I wasn't talking about those christians...I was talking about the ones that teach their children to love their neighbors as themselves...and then turn around and say..."Except those people over there because they are the scum of the earth"...

    Not hating someone shouldn't be so hard...though I do understand that people have difficulty with that...

    Also the smoking mother was your example...and what I meant with her was that as long as she was to trying stop we could cut her some slack..

  • OK... so you were talking about the Christians who are almost never seen, heard or experienced . The Christians who barely exist.

    But you say that they are "many".

    How old are you?

  • I'm talking about the christians that I've experienced...that I've seen...and trust me...there have been many...a whole parish in fact...just because you haven't seen them doesn't mean that they don't exist honey...

    And why are you asking for my age? I don't really think that that is any of your business...and it's certainly not relevant to this conversation...or have you just run out of things to say?

  • I am asking about your age, because it makes a difference to me.

    I may have more to say, but I would like to know what sort of person I am speaking with.

  • just because you haven't seen them doesn't mean that they don't exist honey

    ==

    Please do not call me honey.

  • your shiting me more than 70% of the populashon is christan

  • Uhhh.. you must be a child. You did not understand the comment at all.

  • hang on you were talking about the christans who love thare nabors o thare are varey few who practis in that respect

  • Your spelling is so bad, I cannot really tell what you are saying.

    But no... I was not talking about how many Christians there are.

  • that's a lie lilsparky97 its less than 50%

  • More that 70% of the population knows how to spell and compose a grammatically correct sentence. You are not part of this percentile.

  • yes i know and 100% of me dosenet give a shit

  • the smoking mother was your example.

    ===

    Yes it was. I was comparing it to your definition of hypocrisy.

    When you saw that example, you changed your mind about what hypocrisy is.

  • No...when you changed your example...I decided I would give the fictional woman some slack...

    I would extend the same slack to any christian that was seriously trying to stop themselves for hating people based on their sexuality...

  • I never changed my example. I only used one. It was the same woman and the same instance.

    How old are you?

  • You did...at first it was a woman who smoked and told her children not too...then it was a woman who was trying to stop smoking...they are not the same thing...if you had intended for the woman to be trying to quit in the first place you should have said something...because I can't read your mind...

    I still don't know what my age has to do with what type of person I am...but...if you must know I'm 17...

  • It was always the same woman. I just left off a detail.

    Thank you for letting me know your age. I give respect to younger people.

  • I don't like fags.

    put them all on an island in the middle of the ocean.

  • honey your going to need a big island

  • Actually, if you actually researched at all, all research points to that it's NOT a choice, and that it's a mixture of genetic predisposition and environmental factors.

    And there are 1500+ Animals that exhibit homosexuality.

    So think about it. I know thinking is hard for you people, but try.

  • Comment removed

  • Actually, homosexuality is not exactly found in animals that survive.

    Behavior that can be interpreted as homosexual may exist... but it is not the primary process of sexual intercourse for these animals.

    It might be said that they are bisexual.

    However, if they are "dominating" another animal, it might not even really be sexual.

  • You suck

  • Most animals do not have long term partnerships, and they do not have sex for pleasure like humans do. Also Humans in their natural state practice various gender rolls, trans-sexuality, gay relations and marriage. Take Hawaiians before being colonized by America, or Thai land that has never be colonized and they now have a prominent transsexual community because they have no oppressive government against it.

  • whoa. that has to be the most ignorant and mislead comment i've ever seen. 10% of every population, human or animal is gay; and it's not a choice. people are born with it as a genetic mutation... choice has nothing to do with it.

  • Zero evidence it is genetic. Zero.

    And your 10% number is bogus.

  • WHY DO YOU CARE?! What difference does it make too you if gays get married?! You aren't going too get ass-raped by pirates, you aren't going too get bitch slapped with a fish, your life stays the same, so why is it relevant to YOU?

    And, yes, I take this personally because it personally effects me.

  • Why do you care why I care?

  • Because it effects ME personally. I could care less whether or not you approve of the gay lifestyle, but why can't we just be functioning members of soceity with our slight tweak?!

  • I believe that gays can be functioning members of society with their MAJOR tweak. They do not need to be "married" to do that.

    I believe that same sex "marriage" is a tipping point to sexual anarchy.

  • What difference does it make too you if your neighbor has a husband and two kids instead of a wife?

  • No difference at all, as long as my neighbor is a woman instead of a man.

  • Mmm-hmm, and what is the difference to YOU PERSONALLY that effects YOU SO MUCH THAT YOU FEEL YOU MUST GET INVOLVED LEGALLY IF IT IS TWO MEN OR TWO WOMEN?!

  • Uhhh.. maybe gay men rape me every time I go out and I want to get revenge.

    You know... people do not have to have things to affect them personally to have an opinion or a vote.

    I realize that you do not like the democratic processes but that's how it is.

  • Okay, so you just hate these people blindly for no real reason, so you want too suppress them being a part of society because of your blind hatred of these people that you know nothing about and it's your right too have a say in what happens or doesn't happen too these people because you hate them.

    IT DOESN'T HURT ANYONE AND HAS NOTHING TOO DO WITH YOU!!

    Why can't we ban interracial marriages too? What about inter-religion marriages? SAME CONCEPT!!

  • Didn't you read what I wrote? They rape me every time I leave the house. That's a pretty good reason, eh?

  • sexual anarchy? and i believe bigots and assholes like u need to be put to death

  • Heh... are you sure you want all bigots to be put to death?

    You might regret that sort of policy.

  • why? the world needs love not hate

  • And you think you are putting out love?

  • no putting out hate no group of people should be discriminated based on who they love

  • Ok.. so you say the world needs love, not hate, but you agree you are putting out hate.

  • yes the world doesn't need bigotry and discrimination any more

  • And yet you are advocating bigotry.

  • u do realize i was joking about the killing all bigots thing right? don't take everything so seriously dude but really judging from the previous comments before me u are a bigot

  • No, I did not realize that it was a joke.

    I suppose you realize that people say "Death to Fags" are joking also.

    How old are you?

  • no thats not a joke and i'm 18

  • Wait... its a joke when you say it but not a joke when others say it.

    Can you say "hypocrisy"?

  • ok lets get back on topic when i called u a bigot since u are anti-gay correct?

  • Yes, you called me a bigot. You do not know me. You are intolerant. Thus, you are a bigot yourself.

  • then because u are anti-gay and have no proof that being gay is wrong that makes u a bigot

  • 1. You do not know that I am anti-gay

    2. You do not know that I have no proof that being gay is wrong.

    3. But despite that you are intolerant of me.

    Even if what you thought were true, that fact that you are intolerant, makes you a bigot.

  • i know u are anti-gay judging from your other comments or have u forgotten about them?

  • You do not know that I am anti-gay, you imagine it.

    You are being a bigot.

  • Um, sorry to burst that happy little bubble, but lots of species have same-sex couplings; bonobos, tortoises, dolphins and elephants to name a few. Anyway, since when did we use animals to measure our moral standards? Being gay is not a choice and it is not wrong.

  • There are gay animals and it would have taken you seconds of research to figure that out.

    Okay, think, you get horny correct? You get horny at the sight of the opposite sex right? But not from the same sex, the same sex just doesn't raise your pole, it would be IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TOO GET OFF ON THE IDEA OF THE OPPOSITE SEX! With homosexuals it is the opposite, they just CANNOT GET OFF ON THE IDEA OF THE SAME SEX!

    And, no, I will never give up on marrying the GIRL OF MY DREAMS!

  • thats how dumb you are.... there are gay animals

  • The evidence so far indicates that in most cases it is not a choice.

    And animals do display homosexual behavior.

  • Comment removed by author

    hahaha that's right. keep your trolling words to yourself. you're not convincing anyone of anything otherwise.

  • Comment removed

  • 'WOO HOO' is what plastikmanfan first said the comment before you copied him/her by saying 'WOO HOO'.

    Troll, grow the fuck up.

  • DURound, can't you do better than copying someone else's words?

    plastikmanfan is right; you sound like a spoiled brat.

  • WOO HOO! More social progression.

    Homosexual intercourse was legalized in India by the Delhi High Court on July 2, 2009.

  • I live in romania, you're eating shit by the bucketloads

  • Whereas DURound's 'in the past 8 months' comment was proven to be false. Gay marriage is becoming legal by leaps and bounds!

  • eqca ( dot ) org

    It's important to fight the people that want to keep equal rights from minority groups.

  • Thanks for recognizing that gay marriage is legal in the USA, DURound. :-)

    ..and it's spelled Maine, not Main.

  • My '10 year comment' stands true.

    Everyone, do a search for 'gay marriage timeline' for proof.

  • Common knowledge: Drops in a bucket add up.

    This is how social progression advances; slowly but surely.

  • So much for the 'in the past 8 months' comment.

    Easily proven to be false, just like all his other comments.

  • May 6, 2009: Maine legalizes same-sex marriage.

  • Oh look. DURound is again proven to be a liar; LESS than his supposed '8 months ago' comment:

    June 3, 2009: New Hampshire legalizes same-sex marriage.

  • Still copying and pasting and demanding an apology. Spoiled brat rationale.

  • The fact remains, jtyranus.

    Gay marriage, in the past 10 years, has become more popular AND accepted AND legalized on a global scale.

    Social progression is why there is no more slavery and why homosexuality is becoming more accepted on a global scale. :-)

  • Yeah, again you copied what I said 2 minutes ago, DURound.

    Again, more proof that you are incapable of debating.

  • My comments stand as proof; anyone can verify them by doing research.

    Whereas your childlike demeanour in this conversation is only proving that you can't be civil, DURound.

    'Monkey see monkey do' only makes YOU look like a monkey, DURound. I don't copy and paste what YOU say to slander your words.

    It stands that your character is not mature enough to continue a debate here.

  • jtyranus, you see how DURound acts? Copying and pasting what I say and changing a couple words in order to lie.

    Troll alert.

  • Marriage is defined as being between a man and a woman.

    AND man and man.

    AND woman and woman.

    Tens of thousands of gay couples are already married, and their licences are recognized by the government.

    :-) There's nothing you can do to stop social progression.

  • DURound, when you state facts, you should include all the pertinant information.

    You're right, marriage in CA is currently between a man and a woman, but there are over 15,000 HOMOSEXUAL married couples in CA state and their marriages are valid, legal and binding.

    The truth remains, gay marriage has already started to incorporate itself in our modern society.

    Fact.

  • DURound thinks Marriage is ONLY between a man and a woman.

    Oh, then when I enter a court of law in the USA and state that my husband is my husband, why is it they willingly adhere to the stature of our relationship?

    Prove me wrong, else continue to act like an ignorant fool.

    Marriage isn't just about a man and woman anymore. It hasn't been for almost 10 years now.

    Get with the times.

  • "The proof that you are wrong is Proposition 8"

    How small is your mind that you only think about one state?

    That's why your cause is losing....because meanwhile around the WORLD (and even in other states in the USA), marriage is not sorely about man and woman anymore.

    You can be ignorant about this topic; that is your prerogative. That is your demise.

  • 2-3% of the world population...you AGREE then DURound that gay marriage has already started to become situated in society.

    It's only been 10 years, deary. With every passing year, MORE countries and MORE states are legalizing same-sex marriage.

    You can be ignorant about this topic; that is your prerogative. That is your demise.

  • Rejected? No that's a blatant lie. :-) You can't prove that 98% of the World population rejects gay marriage.

    All you can do is copy and paste my conversation and twist it with your fallacies.

    Meanwhile gay marriage is slowly but surely becoming part of society.

  • 7% of the World's countries ACCEPT gay marriage because they made it legal.

    Now you're just trolling; which is characteristic of someone who doesn't know how to debate,

  • Oh, so because YOU feel I was being disrespectful (by proving you wrong when I said marriage isn't ONLY about man and woman) you act like a child and copy what I say with the intent of slandering my words?

    I highly doubt you're 52 years old.

    If you are, you still have much growing up to do.

  • And 7% of the countries have legalized same-sex marriage.

    More on the way. :-)

    There's nothing you can do to stop it. Social progression is why there is no more slavery in the USA.

  • Speculation (amendment) doesn't warrant you as being a credible speaker of truth.

    Speculation is why your cause is losing and gay marriage has become more and more popular with every passing month.

    The youth of America agree; the majority of them agree that gay marriage should be legal.

    :-)

  • I don't speculate. Do a google search for "gay marriage progression" for facts.

    The bulk of America is 2-3% in majority, and that percentage is dropping with every passing month.

    Unless you believe Gallup polls (and various other respected and neutral polls) are not true?

  • proposition 8 defeat is ONE case.

    I'm talking about the World here. More societies around the world are accepting homosexuality and homosexual marriage, otherwise there wouldn't be more States and Countries in the past 10 years legalizing gay marriage.

    Besides, the one state you speak of already has almost 18,000 legally-married gay couples.

  • Love this video... EVERYONE KEEP YOUR HEADS UP AND HEARTS STRONG KEEP FIGHTING DONT GIVE UP SPREAD EQUALITY AND LOVE

  • ...because I am a man, and I am married to a man -- which is a legal event under the laws of Canada (and recognized by states in the USA and 6 other countries on Earth).

    So, for future reference, try to state facts that are true.

    Thanks.

  • Marriage is defined as being between a man and a woman in almost every country of the world, by the Federal Government of the United States and by almost all of the states of the United States. In addition, per the Defense of Marriage act, no state and no citizen and no organization is required to recognize same sex marriage.

    So, for future reference quit being a liar and try to state facts that are true.

  • I'm lying when I say I'm legally married to my husband in Canada?

    Hmmmm, DURound?

    Or are you lying when you suggest my marriage isn't legal and true?

    Yeah, thanks for the correct answer either way.

  • Shortened their lives by 18 days? They still live the same amount of time no matter how its measured.

    Seems to me you would rather forget the past. Just because an abhorrent behavior occurred somewhere far away or in the past doesnt mean you just ignore it. Learning from past mistakes as it were.

  • Is there a reason why you are trying to argue about this? A calender change just doesnt that important to me. Of course you could explain why it is.

  • One was a change in measurement.

    One was the transgression on other peoples rights.

    please tell me you can discern the difference?

    Unless of course you can actually explain to me how a calender change managed to change time?

  • Its true I do. Such behavior bothers me greatly and is why I try to prevent such behavior from continuing.

    I do think about it. I think that if anyone tried that with me there might be a new story about ghost ship drifting around with all the crew missing.

  • If things that occurred in the past dont interest you then you are probably bored most of the time. Scary stories both fact and fiction, the news of a tragedy that happened yesterday, finding out your friend won the lotto a year or two ago. Those all dont mean much to you do they?

  • If only most of that behavior only happens then. For example I had some douche come on my prop 8 video saying how gay marriage shouldnt be allowed. He fails to list as to why it shouldnt, and completely misses the parallel to the loving case in which people were told they couldnt get married for the same reason: the icky feelings people have about it.

  • Theres a reason why it hasnt happened in a hundred years. People like me obsessively railing against those injustices. Never forgetting, never forgiving.

    As for the popes, at least a half dozen times. I think about these things quite frequently you know.

    Irradiate myself? lol like the fantastic four. No, just detonate their gunpowder magazine. Assuming we are talking about an 18th century ship of course.

  • Because obsessive people were railing over the isssue. Of course there was a war, they cant do it all on their own.

    They arent sobs. More like angered grunts and sighs of frustration. I cant cry.

    Dont much care for the Hulk. Not completely in control of his faculties most of the time.

  • Is this all you wanted to do? BS on my channel?

  • DURound said: "I asked you to show which ones you proved false and so far, all you have done is call names. "

    Excuse me? Is that how you debate?

    You lied when you said marriage is between a man and a woman, and stated boldly that it is a fact.

    It is not a fact. Not for over 9 years now.

    Marriage is between

    1. Man and Woman

    2. Man and Man

    3. Woman and Woman

    Fact.

  • Marriage is between:

    1. Man and woman

    2. Man and man

    3. Woman and woman

    If you disregard #2 and #3, then your factual claim is FALSE.