I have Windows Chicago Build 40. I casually found the build 40 CD when I was searching for the build 58. It is only an upgrade for windows 3.1. On the boot screen it says: Preliminary Release - May 1993
Is that a text field in the start menu bar? Is it functional or just a spacer in this early build? I've always wanted a run box or command line visible from anywhere in the OS. Also, that task management is actually really cool.
@jvdthwip That blank white space at the bottom was like an early version of the "Quick Launch" -- it was basically a folder inside the taskbar, where you could move or copy files there. Programs running in the background didn't appear in the taskbar though, they appear "within" the desktop like Windows 3.x did.
theres a cool thing: if you dont want to shut your computer down but you have clicked on the confirm button, you can press ctrl-alt-del to cancel.. thats nice
@UploadVideos247 That's not so real. The "X" button that time there was not yet. This "-" button is not gone. It was like this: Microsoft has invented the "X" button and the "-" button madeinvisible, it gives him even more! Simply click the top left of the window and you'll see.
@TheAwesomeGuardian Looks like something went wrong during the installation.
I would recommend you try reinstalling it, then try the VPC if it is still not working, and if that doesn't work, your computer might be "too new" to run this old version, like now.. after I updated to Windows Virtual PC (from Virtual PC 2007) on my PC running Windows 7, I can't even operate it properly anymore :(
and for all thoes calling it a windows 95 beta it is not a windows 95 beta.... build 122 onwards was named 'beta' this is a pre beta or some may say alpha
@SuperAce98 people dont hate it now... it's just had a rough life its been abused by older computers thats what people were complaining about, because there ancient xp computers from 2003 couldnt run it... vista is prefect nowdays it jsut got off on the wrong foot
@MBCCOMPANY Yeah, but it's not. Wikipedia checks sources and info to see if anything's fake. Go try to vandalize a page. It'll be fixed by admins in no time.
Wow, who would of known that Windows 95 was to look like this. Also, look at how early this is! This still has alot of Windows 3.1 stuff in it! Very early alpha, but I think that build 26 is the earliest..., but anyways, nice job dude!
This might be compatible with Sun Virtual Box, but I haven't tried it to see if it works myself, I do know that the Virtual Hard Drive I provided will not work with VirtualBox, since its only designed for Virtual PC 2007.
THANKS! You don't know how long I've been looking for this. It looks better than the Windows 95 now (I still love Windows 95 though), except for the errors. 5/5, adding it to favorites & playlist.
It shouldn't be dead, the original link may require to login but the one on Windows Live Skydrive isn't, if you can't download it then you may have some problem downloading files from Skydrive.
Try destroying the OS...
Megadoomable 2 days ago
and thats almost 2 decades old
mahirharoon 3 weeks ago
Windows Chicago is a mixed breed of Windows 3.1 and Windows 95.
Taking1n1 1 month ago
This Windows version is between 3.1 and 95.
TheRealDutchOwner 2 months ago
i'll let you know if the second iso file worked.
billyhope02 2 months ago
@billyhope02 this iso file did not work!
billyhope02 2 months ago
This is build is really cool! I downloaded a .VHD file.
TheAlexander952 4 months ago
I have Windows Chicago Build 40. I casually found the build 40 CD when I was searching for the build 58. It is only an upgrade for windows 3.1. On the boot screen it says: Preliminary Release - May 1993
UltraMegaboss 5 months ago
ммммм древняя винда)
MrPelmenka 6 months ago
.iso file is not booting could anybody PLEASE HELP!!!!
RandomRaddaGuy 6 months ago
does anyone have build 56?
ZVONIMIR111 8 months ago
It worked on my Virtual PC Even With 8 mb of ram
JPizzicicleParody 9 months ago
Dis shizzle can run Crysis 2? :D
PSNelibeerbelly 10 months ago
Co to kurwa jest!? WTF!?
lakesumek 11 months ago
GRAPHICS- 10/10 SPEED- 10/10 xD
adityadb906 11 months ago
Is that a text field in the start menu bar? Is it functional or just a spacer in this early build? I've always wanted a run box or command line visible from anywhere in the OS. Also, that task management is actually really cool.
jvdthwip 1 year ago
@jvdthwip That blank white space at the bottom was like an early version of the "Quick Launch" -- it was basically a folder inside the taskbar, where you could move or copy files there. Programs running in the background didn't appear in the taskbar though, they appear "within" the desktop like Windows 3.x did.
UploadVideos247 11 months ago
theres a cool thing: if you dont want to shut your computer down but you have clicked on the confirm button, you can press ctrl-alt-del to cancel.. thats nice
MetalUpYourAssFuck 1 year ago
Ever since, Windows has the blue title bar as default (except 1.x and Vista)
ejzllanes96 1 year ago
LOL, no 'x' button. NOW WHAT!
RET80 1 year ago
@RET80 It was a mix between Windows 3.1 and 95. The "x" button was the "-" in the top-left of the corner, it does look strange at first...
UploadVideos247 1 year ago
@UploadVideos247 That's not so real. The "X" button that time there was not yet. This "-" button is not gone. It was like this: Microsoft has invented the "X" button and the "-" button madeinvisible, it gives him even more! Simply click the top left of the window and you'll see.
S0ZlALAMT 8 months ago
@RET80 this is when microsoft did not know the letter X
ohnoes775 9 months ago
wow.... im 12.. even i wasnt alive in 1993 this Reminds me a lot...
i love old os
AlexBestGTA 1 year ago
Got it to bootup, With the screen, But then it just goes straight to - Cannont find or load required file KRNL386.EXE.
C:\>_
TheAwesomeGuardian 1 year ago
@TheAwesomeGuardian Looks like something went wrong during the installation.
I would recommend you try reinstalling it, then try the VPC if it is still not working, and if that doesn't work, your computer might be "too new" to run this old version, like now.. after I updated to Windows Virtual PC (from Virtual PC 2007) on my PC running Windows 7, I can't even operate it properly anymore :(
UploadVideos247 1 year ago
and for all thoes calling it a windows 95 beta it is not a windows 95 beta.... build 122 onwards was named 'beta' this is a pre beta or some may say alpha
jedixo 1 year ago
hey mate i managed to get a cd driver working by adding the driver to the root and then configuing the autoexec.bat and config.sys files... :)
jedixo 1 year ago
@SuperAce98 people dont hate it now... it's just had a rough life its been abused by older computers thats what people were complaining about, because there ancient xp computers from 2003 couldnt run it... vista is prefect nowdays it jsut got off on the wrong foot
jedixo 1 year ago
@SuperAce98 Lots of people don't like Windows Vista because it wasn't very reliable and lots of drivers wasn't compatible with it.
UploadVideos247 1 year ago
Who needs windows 7!!!
2bluelava2 1 year ago
thanks it works 5 stars
mooch1441 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake!
HELLOKID123456789 1 year ago
@HELLOKID123456789 This isn't fake at all, this is the Beta of Windows 95. Research before you post such stupid comments!
UploadVideos247 1 year ago 2
@UploadVideos247 can be an fake informacion on wikipedia
MBCCOMPANY 1 year ago
@MBCCOMPANY Yeah, but it's not. Wikipedia checks sources and info to see if anything's fake. Go try to vandalize a page. It'll be fixed by admins in no time.
Jk981206 1 year ago
@Jk981206 OK
MBCCOMPANY 1 year ago
@HELLOKID123456789 Its Windows 95 beta, Just like Windows 7 had a beta
bg048 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HELLOKID123456789 Its Windows 95 beta, Just like Windows 7 had a beta
bg048 1 year ago
Wow!,to think about windows 7 compared the speed
xburritoxboy 1 year ago
if there is windows chicago why not make windows seattle?
masumi99 1 year ago
@masumi99 LOL, Hello seattle!
Jk981206 1 year ago
Wow, who would of known that Windows 95 was to look like this. Also, look at how early this is! This still has alot of Windows 3.1 stuff in it! Very early alpha, but I think that build 26 is the earliest..., but anyways, nice job dude!
jamesoleruster 1 year ago
Wow. Who would of known that Windows 95
jamesoleruster 1 year ago
it works for me but it usually takes more than one try to get it to boot up
dmcmLIVE 2 years ago
Looks cool. ISO didn't work. Now downloading VHD. Anyway, thx. I hope this doesn't contain any virus? :( Cuz i had problems before with youtube
navigator256 2 years ago
There shouldn't be a virus in the download, I hope not anyway... nobody reported there was a virus so it should be okay :)
UploadVideos247 2 years ago
TY for your quick reply! But the VHD zip is not .zip, but .zip_?
navigator256 2 years ago
The Virtual Hard Drive (.vhd) is in a compressed zipped folder (.zip) it download and works fine on Windows.
UploadVideos247 2 years ago
Thanks! it worked! :) Virus-free
navigator256 2 years ago
Wow. This Is The Very First Build.
(reference from wikipedia)
techguy348 2 years ago
is this Sun Virtual Box Compatible?
KingofComputing 2 years ago
This might be compatible with Sun Virtual Box, but I haven't tried it to see if it works myself, I do know that the Virtual Hard Drive I provided will not work with VirtualBox, since its only designed for Virtual PC 2007.
UploadVideos247 2 years ago
Um after I install it, it starts up with a black screen with an underline somewhere at the bottom of the screen. That's all I get...
YoutuJ3eJ3lows 2 years ago
OMG! That looks freaking awsome! If they would remake Chicago it would be nice...
TheIcaJerry 2 years ago
is this parrallels compatible?
seinfeldfan7898 2 years ago
This is so slow windows. Looks fine but it is so slow. ">8-("
merkur32123 2 years ago
yup, worse than vista
hiervince 2 years ago
wait until you see my computer that BARELY has programs on it.
Robloxian182 2 years ago
what is the function of that empty wite thing on the taskbar?
37311636 2 years ago
You can drag folders and stuff there
ThePhoneUpdate 2 years ago
i think its a run command line?
KingofComputing 2 years ago
Great system actually.
It is cool,why I do not haved Internet when it launched...
*subscribes n favorites*
MrAce1500 2 years ago
THANKS! You don't know how long I've been looking for this. It looks better than the Windows 95 now (I still love Windows 95 though), except for the errors. 5/5, adding it to favorites & playlist.
LivingdeadMetal 2 years ago
Hey! same ms paint as win 3.1
MapleStoryP 2 years ago
How does the zip work?
I like winRAR better.
MapleStoryP 2 years ago
In WinRAR, just right click on the ZIP file when downloaded and click Extract Files... and extract them.
UploadVideos247 2 years ago
i love it but even at my young age it makes me feel old how much things have progressed and changed lol
spymasterwade 2 years ago 2
Wow. Amazing, From Windows 1.x to Windows 7. They have definitely changed a lot since then...
TomboFry 2 years ago 15
@TomboFry Personally id say this is slap bang in the middle of the biggest change. Its almost totally different to the 3.xx
chootastic 11 months ago
13mB! wow, haaha, nice OS actually reminds me of BartPE (Windows XP Live CD) the way the start menu is I mean. Thanks for the ISO as well.
TeamXR07 2 years ago 4
I thought this is fake when i saw this first time ;P LoL
2nnt 2 years ago
early chicargo builds were realy buggy. i liked them because they are unique in their interface
jedixo 2 years ago
The download link is dead :-(
topsyandpip56 2 years ago
It shouldn't be dead, the original link may require to login but the one on Windows Live Skydrive isn't, if you can't download it then you may have some problem downloading files from Skydrive.
UploadVideos247 2 years ago
I downloaded the VHD It wont boot just a flashing line XD
darkwolfy503 2 years ago
It should work, I redownloaded the one on Skydrive and created a new VM, using 64MB RAM and seems to work correctly.
UploadVideos247 2 years ago
Oh thanks man I didnt know I think it was because it had to much ram haha I had like 1gig on it =P
darkwolfy503 2 years ago
I am having the same problem and I am using 64MB of ram. btw this is Yamaha250FMF
psp034 2 years ago
i also have the chicago beta 1 iso from may of 94
davegsucks 2 years ago
Notice how the Start Button is how it is now in 2009 - Just a single icon.
2BunnyReturns 2 years ago 3
Thanks, is there a way i can get internet on there, and how can I get sound? I want to here what it sounds like compared to XP.
stydel311 3 years ago
It's like in between win 3.1 and 95. The windows are still 3.1 style, but the desktop is 95 style (mostly).
Lightness1882 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
man this chicago sucks
FISAIDRAGAN 3 years ago
... it was 16 years ago they didn't have vista so der....
jackomaco 3 years ago 12
I love all the old versions of windows!
I thought I would never find windows chicago, I saw it on a windows history video. never released!
dimb9 3 years ago 4