Why did you keep the standard M52 intake manifold ?
I thought an M50 intake manifold would be much better in this case...
French20cent 1 month ago
little exhaust leak there.
fortheLoveofuk 1 month ago
LOL @ 0.29 hahahahahaha!
okli 1 year ago 3
good machine, boring vid
stodolaedyszyn 2 years ago
den lyter utæt ....
bimsem5 2 years ago
när man turbo konverterar en m52 motor då byter man väl plats på luftintaget till vänster sida (sedd framifrån) visst :O ja e int så bra på turbos lite mer åt kompressor :P
metalwasp 2 years ago
I see that's M52 turbo :-O . Can You write full specs of engine ?
piotrespl 2 years ago
@piotrespl Well of course its an M52, if it's 2.8
kregzdeM3 1 year ago
@kregzdeM3
Not for sure, some people built "M50B28" fo turbo so M50 block and rest from M52, or that's just M50 and M52 mix.
piotrespl 1 year ago
Comment removed
DAStijn 5 months ago
Nice work kempuz !
DrHagenstein 3 years ago
Why did you keep the standard M52 intake manifold ?
I thought an M50 intake manifold would be much better in this case...
French20cent 1 month ago
little exhaust leak there.
fortheLoveofuk 1 month ago
LOL @ 0.29 hahahahahaha!
okli 1 year ago 3
good machine, boring vid
stodolaedyszyn 2 years ago
den lyter utæt ....
bimsem5 2 years ago
när man turbo konverterar en m52 motor då byter man väl plats på luftintaget till vänster sida (sedd framifrån) visst :O ja e int så bra på turbos lite mer åt kompressor :P
metalwasp 2 years ago
I see that's M52 turbo :-O . Can You write full specs of engine ?
piotrespl 2 years ago
@piotrespl Well of course its an M52, if it's 2.8
kregzdeM3 1 year ago
@kregzdeM3
Not for sure, some people built "M50B28" fo turbo so M50 block and rest from M52, or that's just M50 and M52 mix.
piotrespl 1 year ago
Comment removed
DAStijn 5 months ago
Nice work kempuz !
DrHagenstein 3 years ago