Added: 2 years ago
From: drivingiscommerce
Views: 37,675
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (509)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @greywolf424 Which pile of shit? My 1970 Challenger R/T, 1998 BMW 328i, 2009 BMW 550i x drive, or my 2010 Dodge Ram 2500 Mega Cab? Dude, I own duplexes and an apartment complex and I have a degree in Constitutional law. You want the case numbers? I'll give you all of the cases upheld by the supreme court about your RIGHT to drive. The other stuff is too complicated for someone as niggardly and naive as you.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b Dude, it's a PRIVILEGE to "drive"! The correct word is: USE - as in "I USE my personal property for NONCOMMERCIAL HOUSEHOLD TRAVEL purposes and my ENJOYMENT." That puts us squarely behind BOTH constitutions, State & fed! We mess up because we're using the WRONG WORDS and weren't taught the LEGAL DEFINITIONS of the one's used in the Vehicle Code. greywolf isn't interested in law or justice, only pissing in other people's drinking water. He's a Nazi.

  • @drivingiscommerce Yeah I know! I'm sick of arguing with that freedom hating hippie. I just graduated from Marquette in December. I was studying Constitutional law. You're right about using the wrong words and not learning the the lingo. It's pretty much necessary if you want to exercise your rights. I'm against permits and licenses for everything, especially concealed carry. We need permission to exercise a right? Haha right about that guy... What a douche.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b STILL WAITING ON THAT PROOF SOCK PUPPET SHILL

  • @dedicatedkiller11b In California USE determines how a THING is classified or which CATEGORY of personal property it belongs in. If something is used for COMMERCIAL purposes it's properly identified as EQUIPMENT. If it's use for NONCOMMERCIAL purposes it's identified as CONSUMER GOODS.These definitions are found in the Cal Commercial Code. So if you use your car and get paid when you do it's EQUIPMENT, if you don't get any $ then it's CONSUMER GOODS, like your watch or shoes.

  • @drivingiscommerce The VC regulates COMMERCE and all the rules in it apply to someone engaged in BUSINESS using a MOTOR VEHICLE to TRANSPORT PASSENGERS or PROPERTY for hire. All the words use ie TRAFFIC, apply to commerce. Traffic means Commerce. Send me a private message and provide an email address & I'll send you some links to some hot info.

  • @greywolf424 Yes you can. Your name on your birth certificate and driver's license is not you, the flesh and blood, sentient, sovereign being. It is a strawman. You're a fucking idiot. I'm telling you I did this. I filed a UCC1 and reclaimed my strawman. Plus, I put a lien on the city, not myself you dirty dick licker.

  • @greywolf424 I've already done this, had cases dropped, and won thousands of dollars. You prove me wrong. Do some research. This loser makes more money in a month than you do in a year.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b PROVE IT, CITE THE CASE NUMBERS OR SHOW US THE COURT DOCUMENTS THE CLEARLY SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS.... OH RIGHT, THERE ARE NONE

  • @dedicatedkiller11b "This loser makes more money in a month than you do in a year. "

    .

    CONSIDERING THAT PILE OF SHIT YOU DRIVE, I FIND THAT EXTREMELY UNLIKELY

  • @greywolf424 11 American Jurisprudence, Constitutional Law, section 329, page 1135 (Quoting the U.S. Supreme Court):

    "The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this constitutional guaranty one may,

  • therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct." "… the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference… is a fundamental constitutional right."

    -1979 California case, re White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b "-1979 California case, re White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal."

    .

    ALSO DOES NOT SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS.

  • @greywolf424 The "legally verifiable" documents are, in fact, a properly filled out UCC-1 coupled with a previously established Treasury Direct Account. Did you ever sign a contract with the US Government stating that you would give up certain rights for safety and follow their rules? Did they sign this contract? Where are your legally verifiable papers that will stand up in a court of law? Oh, that's right. You're a piece of shit and probably never graduated grade school.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b "The "legally verifiable" documents are, in fact, a properly filled out UCC-1 coupled with a previously established Treasury Direct Account. "

    .

    BULLSHIT.... UCC1 HAS NO RELEVANCE... IT IS AN INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b STILL WAITING FOR THOSE LEGALLY VERIFIABLE DOCUMENTS THAT WILL STAND UP IN COURT THAT SUPPORTS YOUR STRAWMAN BULLSHIT.... OH SORRY I KEEP FORGETTING, THERE ARE NONE.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b SHOW ME THIS SO CALLED TREASURY ACCOUNT TIED TO YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE..... 1. ALL THE NUMBERS MUST MATCH EXACTLY, AND 2. YOUR EXACT NAME IS TO BE MENTIONED SOMEWHERE ON THE ACCOUNT... OH RIGHT IT DOESN'T EXIST.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b "I put a lien on the city, not myself you dirty dick licker. "

    .

    OH AND YOU DO NOT HAVE THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO PUT A LIEN ON THE CITY SINCE THE CITY DOES NOT OWE YOU A GOD DAMN DIME.... YOUR BULLSHIT WILL BE LAUGHED OUT OF COURT.

  • @greywolf424 TDA exists for your strawman who, until now, has been controlled by the government. We can gain control and ownership of the STRAWMAN by first activating a TDA and then filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement. By activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds in the account. Properly filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement we become the "holder in due course" of the STRAWMAN. A filed UCC-1 is public notice of a registered LIEN by a human against the government manufactured strawman

  • @greywolf424 Just because you are too stupid to understand law doesn't mean you have to be mad at me for pointing it out. You can put a lien on any government agency. We the People of the United States are in charge, not the government. My "bullshit" has yet to be laughed at in court. It's all based on the Constitution which the judges and other court officials swore an oath to uphold and protect. Another reason why I drive without a license or plate. The plate means the state "owns" your car.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b OH AND MORON, I MINORED IN LAW IN UNIVERSITY.... I HAVE FORGOTTEN MORE ABOUT THE LAW IN THE REAL WORLD THAN YOU WILL EVER KNOW.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b "Your name on your birth certificate and driver's license is not you,"

    .

    CONSIDERING IT IS THE NAME MY PARENTS GAVE ME.... I CAN ASSURE YOU IT IS ME YOU UNEDUCATED LIMP DICK LOSER..... YOU BRING STUPID TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL.

  • @greywolf424 Hey, seeing as how you disagree with me, why don't you just piss off and go spend your time on something more productive rather than investing it in hurling profanity. No one asked you to look at it let alone comment. If you disagree then cool, this is MY EXPERIENCE that I'm sharing so if yours is different then put up your own YT channel and express tell people what you experienced. I'm not telling anyone how to live, only what happened to me and what I'm aware of.

  • @drivingiscommerce BACK UP YOUR CLAIMS THAT THIS WORKED WITH ACTUAL COURT DOCUMENTS.... OH RIGHT YOU WON'T BECAUSE YOU'RE LYING. AND AS MENTIONED BEFORE ANYONE FOLLOWING YOUR ADVICE CAN SUE YOU FOR THEIR DAMAGES AFTER THEY LOSE IN COURT.

  • It looks like you've attracted all of the shit flies over here. The only one that's missing is Retsquid.

  • "The word `automobile' connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways."

    American Mutual Liability Ins. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200

  • @JEHERETIC What slide are you referring to?

  • This asshole thinks 300 million people should be able to drive 3 tons of steel at 60 miles an hour all the fuck over the place with no demonstration of rules of the road or knowledge of basic safety required through a state license program because it violates "his freedom". He is a retarded fuckhead that would turn our streets and highways into a bloodbath if he had his way, in the name of "freedom".

  • @Blahblobify That's not true. I'm not advocating irresponsibility. I'm not advocating unlawful behavior. I'm advocating that people comply with the law. I didn't make up the definition of MOTOR VEHICLE, I FOUND it. If you'd read what you're actually seeing you'd realize you've been defrauded by the people you PAY for their permission to use YOUR PROPERTY on YOUR streets. I'm not advocating incompetence or death or destruction.

  • @drivingiscommerce "@Blahblobify That's not true. I'm not advocating irresponsibility. I'm not advocating unlawful behavior. I'm advocating that people comply with the law. I didn't make up the definition of MOTOR VEHICLE" even though ive already disproved you

  • @greywolf424 Really? "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579. This definitely addresses a "permit" or license. I am a lawyer. You are a failure at life seeing as how you cannot comprehend simple English.

  • @greywolf424 I can send you a PM that would be well over 20 pages of laws and ways to get out of something as serious as an OWI or as trivial as a speeding ticket. I use these all the time. I do not have a license or a plate on my car. The police leave me alone. I have a homemade plate protected by a UCC-1 lien. If the state impounds any of my cars they automatically have a $2.5million dollar lien levied against them. If you don't understand it's alright. Confusing shit...

  • @dedicatedkiller11b Thanks but I don't use UCC arguments. I'm familiar with the skinny but what I use is better. It's less confusing and a 7 year old can make the argument. The cops don't follow the rules they swore an oath to follow, that's pretty much what it's all about. There's rules in the VC cops "have to" follow and they don't. Getting them to admit it is pretty easy once you understand what they're REQUIRED to do.

  • @drivingiscommerce What do you use? I think that's why the cops in my area leave me alone. Their friends said if they stop me it'll take hours. lol You're exactly right. They don't follow the rules... Pisses me off because I follow the law as best I can.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b YOU CAN'T PUT A LIEN ON YOURSELF ASSHOLE, WHICH IS WHERE YOU FAIL....

  • Comment removed

  • home of the free mate whats the problem....hahahah

  • @Auszug21 The Vehicle Code regulates commerce. A LICENSE permits the holder to engage in COMMERCE. Find out what a LICENSE is for and you'll understand what the DMV regulates.

  • @drivingiscommerce OH AND BE ADVISED, ANYONE FOLLOWING YOUR BULLSHIT WHO SUFFERS FINANCIAL DAMAGES CAN SUE YOU FOR THOSE DAMAGES.

  • @drivingiscommerce every time you fill up the gas tank of your vehicle you are engaging in commerce and every time you use that gas that you obtained to transport you to work it could also be considered commerce.

  • @notaroundme The "state" has no obligation to keep you safe, that is your job as a freeman and citizen of the USA. Federal Law is above State law. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land and most of it cannot be infringed upon. Your right to travel unfettered and unencumbered is a Constitutionally protected right. MURDOCK vs. PENNSYLVANIA, 319 U.S. 105 Schuttlesworth vs. BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA, 373 U.S. 262,MARBURY vs. MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

  • "The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived." Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221."

  • "The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.

  • Here are two cases where the police tried the same defendant and guess who won? Not the pigs... "The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment." Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.

    "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b None of those cases addressed the issue of whether or not licenses are needed to drive.

  • @dedicatedkiller11b NEITHER OF THOSE CASES ADDRESSED A DRIVERS LICENSE AND SINCE YOU DO NOT NEED TO OPERATE A VEHICLE TO TRAVEL.... YOU FAIL... LOSER.

  • @greywolf424 Words have definitions. OPERATE has both a common and TECHNICAL or LEGAL definition. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you're aware there's such a thing as a LAW DICTIONARY. Now what definitions do you suppose YOUR SERVANTS who make the law are gonna use when they write one?

  • @drivingiscommerce PERSONALLY I USE BLACK'S LAW WHEN I DEBUNK YOUR BULLSHIT

  • @drivingiscommerce AND ACCORDING TO COMMON LAW.... OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE IS DEFINED AS DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE.

  • @drivingiscommerce AND BEST OF ALL AS OF TODAY ACCORDING TO THE NDAA PEOPLE LIKE YOU CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS DOMESTIC TERRORISTS AND REALLY BAD THINGS CAN HAPPEN TO YOU..... OH HAPPY DAYS.

  • Great job DrivingIsCommerce! Kudos and thank you for the effort it took to research, read, find and share this information.. it is priceless! G.B.U.!

  • @govlover Glad you found something of value.

  • @govlover "driving is commerce"

    .

    THE MINUTE YOU BUY GAS YOU ARE INVOLVED IN COMMERCE.

  • @greywolf424 Do you need a hug?  I think that if you aren't careful that you might die of hemorrhoids or something like that. Maybe from a constricted heart. Is there any way that I can help you?

  • How the fuck did I get into this part of Youtube...I was watching Amnesia Let's Plays five minutes ago..

  • what part of a state constitution would you look this up

  • Comment removed

  • @notaroundme Is it fantasy land, or just the simple fact that YOU have failed to learn what you were being taught in school? There's a specific reason WHY the 80's generation is way better educated than all generations after it and a few before it. Our teachers made it perfectly clear that we have a CONTRACT with our governments. Clear that there are in fact different types of law that you have access to IF YOU apply YOUR MIND. This video is TRUTH, get over yourself.

  • These laws and the difinitions change all the time. In California, you still have to have a valid drivers license and a valid registration with a tag display on the vehicle or you'll be cited. Remember the STATE must do what ever is deemed reasonable to keep it's citizen safe and keep things in order. There are loopholes in all laws and some laws just don't work for every situation and are amended OFTEN.

  • Very interesting

  • The systems slowly changes words and phrases and meaning under piles of pages to discourage the average learner. IE changing all words from should to must and MUST has it's own definition.

  • Federal law -always- trumps state law, the supreme court is the one who decides for sure.

  • @ArtworkofaDemise  This is not true.

  • great video thank you for posting

    

  • I have no interest in signing for a drivers license, registration, soc. sec. birth cert. or anything else that would voluntarily reduce my rights. Instead I choose to render neither myself nor my personal property as stock-exchange for U.S.Inc. This country is Godless and judgement will soon be brought. Any person who remains in Jerusalem,Rome,England,U.S. God will Destroy!

  • @MsMotherbug Come out of her lest you share in her sins and receive of her plagues. Why is it that church people cannot see this?

  • @MsMotherbug listen to yourself . Just because you are in a location does not mean you are going to hell. What bible are you reading from .

  • @MsMotherbug sure. We'll hold our breaths. If GOD WILL DESTROY, then why would god allow it? If God is the ALL MIGHTY then surely he (BEING GOD) must have known this, of what he created of these things today would eventually come to pass. The failings of us and all we have failed at must also be the fault of god, since he created us in HIS likeness. And if he did create us in HIS likeness like the bible say he did, then god to is flawed. If this is the best we can do as a people then

  • @MsMotherbug this is the best god can do. And if you don't sign for this and that you live without electricity, without cable or sat. t.v. without credit. Without the use of a phone. without bills or a bank account. If you get ill or injured then you must not go to hospitals....you must not have insurance of any kind and you surely don't own a home. You don't pay taxes ect. So you must be homeless. Now I get it.

  • @notaroundme You do NOT need insurance to go to hospital...America follows Human Rights the same as here in the UK...its a human right to have medcical attention. All the things you mention are worthless & just means of controlling those who don't have the mental capacity to do anything else!

  • @Macsgrafs I didn't say you did. I said no isurance of ANYkind. You enter a hospital you MUST sign for the understanding of the treatment your about to have or refuse. All of what things I mentioned is worthless. You should comprehend what your reading. try again.

  • @MsMotherbug lololol you are like one of those people that comes to my front door way to early in the morning, aren't you?

  • Comment removed

  • Where can I find this document online to use in court?

    

  • @MsKRacer FANTASY LAND!

  • Comment removed

  • @MsMotherbug "What if", "what about", how do I know?!  Re fines, they only happen if you don't argue the case correctly, and even if you do. That's what appeals are for.

  • Federal law does not trump state law unless the Fed can claim jurisdiction. So... The Federal deffinition of a "motor vehicle" only applies if you are being tried under a federal statute. Traffic tickets are never governed by federal statute however, they are handled by state, county and city statutes, codes and ordinances. My state has its own deffinition for a motor vehicle that specifically includes all personal vehicles that are not used for commercial reasons.

  • I died of boredom waiting for this to get to the point.....

  • YOU PEOPLE ARE SO FUCKING STUPID. THIS ISNT THE 1800'S. YOU RETARDS ARE NOT DRIVING AROUND A HORSE AND BUGGY ANY LONGER.

  • @DJVBasil KISS KISS GURL XOXOXO

  • @DJVBasil Isn't funny to read some of these totaly stupid comments.

  • @DJVBasil The information is relevant... 

  • @jap488i Yeap

  • 6:19 so long as one uses his private property for private purposes, and does not devote it to public use, the public has no interest and no voice in its control.

  • By definition:

    Car: 1. an automobile

    Automobile: 1. a passenger vehicle designed for operation on ordinary roads and typically having four wheels and a gasoline or diesel internal-combustion engine. (synonyms: motor vehicle, motor car.)

    Motor Vehicle: 1. an automobile, truck, bus, or similar motor-driven conveyance.

  • @Mewomixify ...when in law ...you need to use Black's Law Dictionary :)

    The word "passenger" bumps you back into "commerce" it's very tricky stuff

  • Please don't use these YouTube armchair legal "experts" as your source of information. Review the case law in your state and from the district courts & Supreme Court.

    This is also a CA document, meaning anywhere outside of California it doesn't apply, even if this person were correct.

    Get REAL legal advice before you go off and get yourself arrested for refusing lawful orders of a police officer. Don't tell him, "I know my rights; I saw this video on YouTube!"

  • @FoxeoGames Blacks law- "act" Acts are either public or private. Public acts (also called general acts, or general statutes, or statutes at large) are those which relate to the community generally, or establish a universal rule for the governance of the whole body politic.

    What's a "body politic"?

  • @crackahcrackah Blacks law- "Body politic"- A term applied to a corporation, which is usually designated as a "body corporate and politic." The term is particularly appropriate to a public corporation invested with powers and duties of government. It is often used, in a rather loose way, to designate the state or nation or sovereign power, or the government or a county or municipality, without distinctly connoting any express and individual corporate character.

  • @crackahcrackah If one doesn't consent to being a part of the body politic, then the body politic has no legitimate claim in administering governance of those outside of the body politic.

    Assholes and liars have conflated the body politic with the actual geography of the land, such that people who live in a given region are trained to think that they are a member of the body politic when in fact they have the choice to live in the area and NOT be members of the body politic.

  • Is a private aircraft a motor vehicle?

  • Do you have a link to this document? I want to print it down.

  • That long ass boring video and a car is still a motor vehicle.. lmao idiot.

  • @TheEodtch

    WRONG AGAIN EINSTEIN........A Motor Vehicle is used in a business for profit using the public roads like a tow truck, taxi cab, 18 wheeler, courier, an ambulance, cement mixer, a contractor.....etc

  • @videocommenter67 Wow, thank you. I am pretty smart but Einstein? Close, and thank you. Oh and you are wrong again. I would say good try but... you know it really isn't.

  • Beautiful work! Thank you very much. The public is so ill informed and they "assume" so many things don't they?!? And, of course, that's the way the courts and the officers giving out the tickets want it. As with many things in this corrupt country follow the money! It's just as De Tocqueville said so long ago: "The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money".

  • OK, so how does the UCC usurp the USC or State Constitutions?

    Im on your side. However I dont see how the UCC is the law of the land. Can you please clear it up for me? Im not gonna read through 400 comments to find the answer.

  • Ron Paul...... 

  • It's very true. I'm fighting a case on a DUI conviction and under the pretense of the constitution, a person conducting business and utilizing their vehicle for revenue generating means is only susceptible under to receive infractions on a motor way. Unless, corpus delicti is inferred in the complaint. You can speed as much as you want, drive without a license, insurance or even registration. This is written law of the land and they can not invoke the rights of their business upon you.

  • anyone knows if its the same in kentucky?

  • How does this work? U R driving without a license based on these legal theories and you get stopped. Do you then cite these laws when asked by LEO why u don't have a license? How does this work in practice? I'm not saying I advocate any of this, but I find it fascinating.

  • @ripperduck What happens is the cop won't listen to any of it, and will arrest you. And in court, the judge won't listen to you, and will convict you. Of course, the freeman will continue to maintain that he is right and the government is just corrupt, but he'll still be in jail.

  • @MidnightWins2 I don't think all cities will arrest you for not having a license. My understanding is that you only get arrested for a crime, not an infraction. Driving without a license is not a crime. Still you have a point. And not having a license is a true pain in the ass. Can't board a plane, can't vote in some cases, try getting utilities without a license or SSN.

  • @ripperduck when you register your car, you are giving it away..! back to the state,  when you register your child you are saying you cannot look after it and are making it a ward of the state.. same with your house and land and everything else that you register...You don't own any of it.

    It's time to stand up for our REAL rights..! all law is an offer, it is a choice, when you know your rights u can turn down their offers.. see dean clifford he;s the master of Sovereignty.. !

  • Forgot to ask, where is the PDF you are showing in your video? Link please?

  • Go by the exact words of the laws on the books. In law every little word can be nitpicked.. look at lawyers.

  • so does this mean i dont have to pay for my tags anymore !? :D

  • If you have any money on you and intend to spend it, you'd be fucked. receipts= fucked, caught on camera in using a bridge toll = fucked all of that is commerce for you or any of your passengers

  • in florida if you travel for pleasure you haveta call it a personal assistive mobility device

  • @Kesava1975 in Fla INFRACTIONS aren't CRIMES. Call it what the Founders called it, PERSONAL PROPERTY. Use the terms/words that were used in your state's Constitution. "A statute does not trump the Constitution."

    People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 2, Conway v. Pasadena Humane Society (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 163

  • @drivingiscommerce What you have done here on you tube is a phenomenal job. Anyone who does not appreciate it is a total dickhead and mental case deserving no answer. Thank you. I have two of your uploads in my favorites and retreiving the information. In no need to fight the system now but I am sure the day will come. I always sensed (I am not an American) that there is something very wrong and illogical with this system. Recently, I have been founding that my worries were justified.

  • @micanut48 Thanks, that's encouraging. What I offer is based on the rules they wrote! That's the beauty of all this stuff, you use the RULES APPLICABLE TO THEM AGAINST them! In Cal the "police contact" for an alleged VC violation is an ARREST, it's IN THE VEHICLE CODE! Either the cop was AUTHORIZED to make a WARRANTLESS ARREST or he wasn't, it's just that simple! NO ONE,other that the few people I study with REBUTS THE PRESUMPTION that the cop was AUTHORIZED to make the arrest!

  • @micanut48 WHAT IF THE COP WASN'T AUTHORIZED? How do you KNOW unless you read the rules? The rules for a WARRANTLESS ARREST for an alleged violation of the VC ARE IN THE VC ITSELF! They're attempting to "throw the book" at you, THROW IT BACK! "Hey officer, did you follow the rules? Fine, for the record tell me which one." I wouldn't ask that out in the street, I'd wait till I got to trial! You HAVE TO lay a proper foundation, but that argument WORKS! I KNOW, I've used it successfully!

  • @Kesava1975 You don't engage in vehicular traffic do you? (16)“Drive” means to operate or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle in any place open to the general public for purposes of vehicular traffic."

    (17) “Driver’s license” means a certificate that, subject to all other requirements of law, authorizes an individual to drive a motor vehicle and denotes an operator’s license as defined in 49 U.S.C. s. 30301.

    Traffic is not defined, traffic is a word for commerce.

  • @teckniec2 no, im not a 'driver' or 'operator', & my names not 'resident' or 'neighbor'

  • @Kesava1975 Sweet. I got rid of my Drivers License a couple months ago, haven't been stopped yet but I will after I put my new plate on my car :)

  • @teckniec2 just a matter of time before the trouble happens. suggest have your affidavit of truth ready. would suggest also dont have a registration/anything other than proof of ownership(letter, receipt, etc..). if possible, when being stopped, do not stop. either turn back around & go back home, or go to a friends house that would not mind storing your property until you return. the police cannot tow on private property. you shouldnt get a eluding charge if you follow the speed limits & such.

  • In my state, laws state "operating", as opposed to "traveling" or "driving". "Operating" is clearly defined, also.

  • @gotgank OPERATE MEANS "BUSINESS". The owner of a BUSINESS OPERATES the business. A tow company owner OPERATES the BUSINESS. OPERATE = RUNNING A BUSINESS.

  • @drivingiscommerce Not in Ohio. Didn't I say "My state"?

  • A car is a vehicle. A car has a motor. Therefore, a car is indeed a motor vehicle. Quote all the court cases out of context that you want, but the reality is that no court has ever agreed that a license is unnecessary to lawfully use a car.

  • @MidnightWins2 Hey dumb shit, COMBUSTION ENGINE, ELECTRIC MOTOR. I'll bet you were FORCED to go to PUBLIK SKOOL. Call yer parents, if they're still on this plane, and tell them they got RIPPED OFF on your edukashun.

  • @MidnightWins2 A LICENSE permits a TAXED, REVOCABLE, and most importantly, PRESUMING you KNOW the difference between a FUNDAMENTAL NON-TAXED SECURED RIGHT, and a GOVERNMENT CREATED COMMERCIAL PRIVILEGE. A "motor vehicle" is a DEVICE USED for COMMERCIAL purposes. You'd KNOW that if you read the fucking rules!

  • @drivingiscommerce None of what you're saying will matter when you're in court and the judge simply replies, "I disagree. Guilty."

  • @MidnightWins2 Familiar with the term "appeal"? How many commissioners have you had a hand in removing from the bench? How many cases have you tried Pro Per? How many UNSOLICITED OFFERS from the PRESIDING JUDGE have you gotten offering to dismiss your case? I drafted the ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE the PJ signed. How many cars have you gotten back WITHOUT PAYING A DIME? I don't believe in luck. After you've studied law for 12 YEARS EVERY DAY, NO DAYS OFF, SELF-FINANCED, get back to me.

  • @drivingiscommerce ...do you really think I'm going to believe that line of bullshit? Yeah, I'm sure all the judges are bowing to a fearsome University of YouTube-accredited lawyer like yourself.  But of course, you have no proof of this. Just like you none of you pseudolawyers ever have any proof for any of your fake exploits in court.

  • @MidnightWins2 I don't give a shit what you believe. I have proof, it's PUBLIC RECORD, you don't. BEST EVIDENCE wins! Buh bye loser!

  • @drivingiscommerce Public record. So I suppose you could post a link to these cases, then?

  • @MidnightWins2 Are you making a proposal? What's the job pay? If you knew anything about law then you'd KNOW where the PUBLIC RECORDS are kept re COURT CASES, correct? Howzabout you get off your lazy dumb ass and get to work and stop bothering the adults.

  • @drivingiscommerce Seeing how I don't know any details of these cases, that would be impossible.

  • @MidnightWins2 Did you figure that out by yourself or did you have some help? You want me to work? What are you offering?

  • @drivingiscommerce Stop being silly.  This is a very reasonable request - I just want the details of the cases you claim have happened.

  • @MidnightWins2 I'll bet you do. Do you work for free?

  • @drivingiscommerce I am not asking you to "work." I am asking you to give me the names and locations of these cases where you supposedly proved these claims. Really, if demanding money from me is your strategy of covering up the fact that these cases don't exist, then you are the worst Internet pseudolawyer I've ever seen.

  • @MidnightWins2 Ok brainiac, let's do it your way seeing as how the concept NEGOTIATION is beyond your comprehension, give me money and I'll give you information; DEMAND isn't a ONE WAY STREET. "GIVE ME" = "DEMAND". Pull your head out of your ass, ALL THE VIDS I POSTED FOR FREE ARE "DOTS". All you gotta do is connect em! Aren't you bright?! Ever heard of "LAW LIBRARY"? Now waddaya suppose they keep on the shelves there? Presuming there's anything left of your frontal lobes to presume with.

  • @drivingiscommerce No, you did not post any proof. You posted a bunch of assertions, and now you're saying you'll only prove your assertions with case history if you're given money. That tells me that you're just another blowhard liar on the Internet.

  • @MidnightWins2 DONE MEANS DONE. The court and law library awaits your presence. It's open daily except Sundays and holidays. Buh bye!

  • @MidnightWins2 I'm not a lawyer & I don't want to be one. I just wanted to know where the REPAIR MANUALS are. Well I found em! Not only can I read, I can think and type too! Again, I don't give a shit what you think, I POSTED MY PROOF! I got my car back and didn't pay a dime! You saw the name of the tow company in the vid. Do your home work asshole, ALL my paper's at the court house! You do know that's where you file PLEADINGS and other court documents right? I prep my own paper, do you?

  • Respond to this video... By the way, we're done. You don't even know the difference between a REQUEST and a DEMAND. Go find someone else to bother.

  • @drivingiscommerce Good job! Keep up the great work. I went to law school, mba school, opened law firm, did that for 12 years until I discovered that all gov's are corporations. Can't be a constitutional republic and a corporation, they are mutually exclusive. Republic = people govern. Corp = board of directors govern the business for the stockholders (shareholders) who own the stock (live stock?). All signatures on gov docs are monetized & sold as derivatives on chicago exch.

  • @MidnightWins2 that's because the judges are not judges but administrators for the corporation. They don't have to follow the law because they are not judges, they're another employee of the same corp the cop works for. and the prosecutor. and the clerk. they all work for the same boss - the corporation. So they don't have to follow the law. That's why cops don't follow the law (constitution) either.

  • any way i can get a pdf of this?

  • Your car is in fact a motor vehicle.

  • @TheEodtch Well you can keep typing that till your fingers fall off and it still won't be true:

    “Automobile owned by individual not in business is ‘consumer goods’”. In re Rave, 7 UCC rep. Serv 258. “An automobile purchased for personal and family use was ‘consumer goods’”. Bank of Boston v. Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A.2d. 484. “The classification of goods in UCC §9-109 are mutually exclusive”.

    McFadden v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep. Serv. 766, (1971)

  • @TheEodtch And you are in fact grossly ignorant.

  • @drivingiscommerce Well it doesn't look like you know what the word fact means. You are stupid beyound belief.

  • great info!!