Added: 5 years ago
From: valis1979
Views: 45,712
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (316)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I logged on to the net purely to double check the name of King Henry VII's Spanish Ambassador in 1503, and ended up watching Paul McCartney death conspiracy videos. I love the internet, and all it's bizarre diversions! Anyway, it's shite. McCartney is alive and kicking, just older and broader, :P

  • Sure looks like the same Paul to me. And the one I have seen perform LIVE in the last two years has the same gestures, mannerisms...etc...as the Paul for the early days. CMON people...Paul is not dead. This was a hoax and was Brian's idea.

    

  • Real Paul, shy, quiet and best of all he has certain movements going on with his lips and tongue, a sign mostly with shy people. He licks his lips constantly, rubs his lips together, one does not loose those things so easily. Fake Paul, not a sign of these at all, not once!!!

  • 20 years of surgery, ten years of Photoshop, nice plastic ears Faul !!

  • i got a real weird conspiracy of verifiable coincidence for you!

    Queen Extravaganza

    Rise of the Heros

    Astonishing coincidence or destiny?

    parts 1 and 2 in new series

    The Rise Of The Heros - QueenExtravaganza -The Great Secret Of Queen part 1

    watch?v=ZhmlgSlHck4

    The Rise Of The Heros - QueenExtravaganza -The Great Secret Of Queen part 2

    watch?v=5W7CFAPl3Vc

  • if paul mcartknee really died then how come no one cried?

    not even any of his relatives

    rofl

  • @DILLONSONG How do you know they did not - but MONEY talks and things can be done and arranged for that family.

  • As if the Beatles didn't change throughout their career as a band? They were at the front of the changes going on then. They were all changing rapidly during the 60s, along with the rest of us. This badly synced piece doesn't even come close to showing how many changes they went through.

    The sad truth is I'm not the real me and you're not the real you anymore. The 21st century has started out fake. Paul's alive and the rest of us are dead.

  • @888888username Thats why the real Paul had big brown eyes and the old fake one now has green eyes! Things that make you go hmmmm

  • @bellodrade yeah so did all the other former beatles music suck.

  • Drugs make u change. I'm from jersey but live in Georgia my accent isn't the same and my northern friends let me know all the time. I got friends who have been addicts n they change appearance in a matter of a year. The beatles were heavy drug users. Look at Paul he always has the same mannerisms look how he moves his head n eyebrows the same guy I'm telling u

  • I don't care if it's Faul because he's amazing as well. He sings amazing. He acts amazing.

    Don't get me wrong, I love Paul, just appreciate Paul and Faul both. They're both Beatles, aren't they??! Does it matter???

  • Yeah, lets say your American and you live in Britain than you will start catching a british accent depending on the person. SO of course his accent might change

  • 6:00 clearly Faul

  • same face same voice but different eyes :(

  • omg, it's a different voice. even the accent is different!

  • does the same thing with george ringo and john. I guess they all died too.

  • I think Paul's nose is a dead givaway. It changed soo much. JMO...

  • Paul is such a great guy.Charming and beautiful !!!

    I love you,Paul

  • Is William Campbell not Paul ha! xD

  • The real Mccartney wouldn't have formed a group like Wings- mediocre pop crap

  • @bellodrade Exactly and not only that--he wouldn't have been with Linda Eastman. She was a notorious groupy and even had stated to others that she could never get Paul McCartney. But when she learned of the "new Paul", she made a deal to keep her mouth shut if he married her. "Faul" actually liked her.

    I love the contrast in these videos. The real Paul is witty, not sarcastic, and he was charming. Faul has a really smart ass-mouth and attitude. Anyone who can't see this is blind.

  • If Paul died back then im glad. After his so called death the music he wrote became even better than it aleady was. But good luck with whatever you believe.

  • @rossjohnson123 Geezus! Most of the stuff was already written--didn't your know that? Duh! And Wings proves the new guy was crap.

  • Paul McCartney is not dead. Those believers are complete fools.

  • goodness, i changed more than paul! guess I am a fake of myself as well!

  • I can't believe I'm commenting on this farce, but comment I must. The accent, timbre and modulation of Paul's voice in all of the videos are the same; the acoustics make it sound different. He swivels in his chair in two of the videos and "talks" with his hands in all of them. His body language and facial expressions are consistent in all of the videos. Even the way he responds to the various interviewers shows the same personality: direct, candid and just a bit cheeky, It's Paul alright.

  • Only two parts of your body keep growing. Your Nose and Ears.

  • Its funny that with humans a majority of us never can see the truth. dont be in that 90% of idiots. Paul is dead and it is easy to tell. The voice is absolutly different and you cannot deny this. Listen to Help before and after. It is damn easy to tell that Oh Darling and Night before are two different people. Too many clues to be coincidence and the beatles wouldnt make up such a thing. RIP Paul.

  • Comment removed

  • there are so many reasons why paul isnt dead and its stupid that people think he is ....but one of the biggest reasons.

    you cant duplicate pauls voice and talent! its not even possible. whoa thats ironic, that two exact "paul mccartneys" were born at the same time with the same everything. is it a crime to change and be more intellectual over a period of a year or two in a time where things are changing fast and you need to be serious? come on people, get your heads together.

  • The voice on the later "paul" is lower. Sure people's voices deepen with age, but in a year? They also look different, not just hair, but jawline, etc. Still pretty good lookalike! Damn!

  • No sé, pero las voces son parecidas, suenan apenas diferentes, pero hay diferencias.

  • That first "Paul" is Keith Allison, a friend of the Beatles who is also a musician.

  • It's impossible to have replaced Paul McCartney. No one is a cute as him!

  • Awesome video, thank you. All i miss is just few more interview example of died Paul. In some spiritual or even metaphysical lever they are so different. Paul is nice, worm, empathic while Faul is clearly egoistic, arrogant and full of self.

  • he says 'you know' a lot in a very similar fashion. i was pretty convinced that he was dead after seeing so many album clues etc, but who knows anymore.

  • Since Paul is a genius, it would be like changing Einstein for some smarter yet unknown old dude.

  • Is there really a group of people who dig into the Paul is dead thing? wow... so who is the guy who's been performing all these years...just an incredible simulation? if so, then um....so what?

  • @dvnobles

    Well, nothing. Just, people deserve truth right? And also, God in heaven knows what else people are lied to. I speak about huge lies like "Fluoride is good for your teeth" while that is good only to poison rats.. Or, tower are drooped like pancakes because of fire.. Or.."Those plain trails are not chemical trail, those are contrails" while they actually poison people with nano fiber, aluminum and barium, some toxic particles. So, we're bin lied for almost anything.

  • This Paul is dead business is so stupid!!!!!!!!! As a sound engineer. Trust me, it's Paul from day one to now...

  • I just noticed that David Crosby is standing behind Paul McCartney just to the left of his microphone at 6:43.

  • Nice video and yes Paul is dead don't bother reading all the lame theorys. Too much time has gone on since that accident & majority of youtubers were not born until after 66? they never knew the real Paul but I remember him!

  • Actually these videos are both Faul. The L.A. press conference in America in 1966 was the first time he appeared. Look up the pictures from that and their San Fran show at Candlestick park you'll see it's Faul. So basically you're comparing Faul with Faul in this video.

  • umm when paul and the beatles first became popular, he was only 19 years old....as you get older your voice gets deeper, you grow, AND YOU BEGIN TO LOOK DIFFERENT BECAUSE YOU ARE GETTING OLDER. why would you try to cover up paul being dead, if he was. john lennon is dead and there's no one impersonating him. george harrison is dead and there's no one impersonating him.

  • clearly his voice is diffrent you would have to be retarded not too catch that

    PAUL is DEAD

  • Am I the only one who enjoys the video due to Paul's insight, and not the fallacious 'Paul is Dead' angle...?

  • There will be an answer at thebeatlesneverexisted "dot" com

  • Comment removed

  • I happen to be a photo-realistic artist and I can tell they are two different people. I've looked at many videos & photos of pre & post '66 pauls. In every instance there are very noticible differences which include: width from ear to ear differ, width between eyes differ, lengh of noise differ, eye brows differ, lips differ, chin, parted hair differ & thats just the face. Height, personalities, voices - so many differences, the compounding evidence is overwelming! Paul is dead but how & why?

  • @gallactorme Yes...there are subtle differences...certain things on a face just cannot be changed....such as ratios of the face...and there IS a difference. Plus...doesn't "Faul's" voice sound more Irish...

  • Same guy.

  • @starlost1957

    Did she not have a horse's face? Hence, Winehorse...

  • LOL...nothing sais LOSER more than persuing this "Paul is dead" thing. It is usually taken up by people who were not even born when the rumor started. These are the same people who grasp at every conspiracy theory in order to feel that they know some fantastically secret event in order to boost their self esteem

  • FAUL !  WILLIAM CAMPBELL!!!

  • Paul is really stupid when talks about how he was just being honest and that it's the press's fault that everyone now knows that he is on acid! Yes paulie you were honest about doing acid , but don't give the guy a medal about it. It was stupid for him to reveal something personal, honest or not. It's not something u should go around telling news people about, it's his fault not the press's.

  • @007heroesfan you obviously dont know what happened. and he said it right there! he was ASKED by a news reporter if he had taken LSD. what he's saying is that if they asked him the question they'd want him to be honest so he was honest. if he'd said "hello world, guess what i'd just done acid" then youre right. but he was asked. if the press never asked him and never spread it, nothing wouldve come out of it. but he was just answering the question.

  • Faul the Fraud! Lets get the truth out and Honor the Real Paul M.

  • in many different ways paul mccartney looks and sound different, john, ringo, an george all sound the same as when they were young to older but paul is the only one that sounds different and looks different.

    and my eyes are brown i wish they would change green but unfortunately they don't only if i would put contacts on.

  • @estelaholguin100 Paul McCartney wears glasses only when he's alone @ home otherwise he wears contacts.

  • in many different ways paul mccartney looks and sound different, john, ringo, an george all sound the same as when they were yound and older and paul is the only one that sounds different

  • What difference? Paul ain't dead. Amy Winehorse is!

  • @sideyone1 Who is Winehorse?

  • does anyone know where i could find the footage for the news conference?

  • "Who do you think does it the best, the Beatles songs?"

    "Us."

    LMAO nice one John.

  • 1:28 - 2:08 WAHAHAAHAHA PAUL MCCARTNEY ! I LOVE YOU SO MUCH <3 made my day :) "yeah we were just trying to write songs about prostitutes and lesbians

    *smirks* then thinks to himself: "what a doormat ! :|" HAHAHHAHAHA

  • He definitely changed. The second "Paul" can't be him. His voice, nose, chin, and cheeks looks different. Also, that mustache looks really fake.

  • Comment removed

  • For those into the metaphysical, you can tell there is a big difference in the energy of these two individuals. Although the imposter looks a lot like Paul he has a completely different energy in his mannerisms and speaking voice. Paul consciousness or Faul consciousness, one might ask.

  • @softsummernights

    Nice comment my friend,really like it.

  • fuck what everone says,THIS NIGGAS DEAD!

  • i don't see any change. same voice, same face, nothing different. he makes a very good point too, that all he did was tell the truth, and it's they're responsibility to air it or not. if they don't want anyone influenced then they shouldn't air it. anyway just because you play a song backwards and it says something about Paul being dead, it doesn't actually mean anything. and no one can double the talent of Paul McCartney.

  • People age, and people tend to 'change' as they get older, you would expect people to know that...Paul is not dead.

  • If you look at the David Frost interview from 65, Paul uses his right hand to express himself for most of the interview. The "fake" Paul uses left hand. See an interview from 67. You have to understand that the symbolism on the album covers actually mean something; it's just not nonsense. It's like the symbol Starbucks uses for its company. It's for a purpose and it's routed in the occult. The last part of this shows a confused man who's trying to be someone he's not.

  • why is the clip at 3:47 in this video? it has nothing to do with paul "dying", or him talking about the rumor- the interview was about LSD.

  • this theory is BS!! And if he'd been changed then he's been around for much longer therefore he IS the paul we know and love and not the "first one"!...Christ! Even having to say that sounds ridiculous.

  • David, your comments, although sensible, really aren't concrete examples as to why Paul is dead. 1. An eye color that changes periodically between Brown to Green and back is called Hazel. It is very possible to "get thinner" as you get older; I have. In addition, my shoe size has gone from an 11 - 12 in the 5 years since I turned 20 and I have grown 2 inches. Does all of that mean I am dead?

  • @chellidan Yes! If you're mind is gone, you might as well be dead.

  • @chellidan I've never heard anyone growing two whole inches after they're.... technically an adult! I've been fixed at 5'8 since I was 16 or 15. Maybe a half an inch in there somewhere, probably less, but two whole inches...? I find that hard to believe, sorry... And I"ll look into this whole green/brown thing...

  • @sammy005 midget

  • @sammy005 Everybody is different, its all genetic...

  • @chellidan and dont forget that he wasnt on LCD and drugs back then too.

  • @chellidan Your rebutal will actually mean something if you grew 2 inches within a few months.

  • @chellidan You clearly aren't analyzing the dudes facial features. These are two distinct looking people. One of them looks natural, the other looks like he's had surgery to look like someone else.

    Follow this link and wake up...Sadly Paul died a very long time ago...

    digilander(dot)libero(dot)it/j­amespaul/fc1(dot)html

  • @ITFProductions You're a funny fellow... Are you dead too? Who knows? Maybe we are all dead!

  • @chellidan I am glad you raise these points so civilly. On the other hand, they gloss over what hazel does: it is not darker brown and a bit lighter in light, nor is a lighter brown-green a rich brown. Shoe size is a possible difference, yes, you are right. The nose bridge in early photos and the sweetheart manner of the original Paul are not there in the 2nd musician Sir Paul. He has to strain in early interviews, to look sort of smooth-fake. Have a good day.

  • actually you were dead since the dark ages from the plauge

  • I agree with Nokturnal... Although possible, it is not probable that Paul is dead and some stand in took his place. David, I can answer each of your questions about Paul... First of all, having eyes that change between green and brown is an eye color called Hazel.  Since I turned 20, my shoe size has gone up 1 size and I have gone from 6 foot to 6'2". Am I dead? Just wondering, haha.

  • BTW, this thing about changing eye color is bollocks. My very own eyes are either green or brown depending on the lighting, so I know that's nothing special.

  • What Noel Gallagher is saying in this vid, that's what I can't understand.

  • Mccartney had a wreck on his moped in 1966, chipped a tooth and busted his lip, you can see this (him) in the Rain/Papaerback Writer videos. That's where all this crap started about him dying in an accident. The Beatles played with peoples minds with this sort of thing and as usual, we bought it up. Shoes off on Abbey road, back mask in a song, it all sells people! An imposter takes over and becomes the most succesful song writer ever? Come on dorks, grow up!!!!!

  • @bedtime4bonz well said! pauil is alive. period!

  • @bedtime4bonz They had it all, publicity stunts are for those who are struggling.

  • With this whole death thing, it's bullshit, I never TRULY believed it, but it freaked me out. Then I saw his face like, flipped to where you could see the exact symmetry, something that cannot be achieved by surgery. PLus, I doubt they would pay attention to every little mole or blemish. But with the eye confusion, some people have color changing hazel eyes. I am 14, and Just the end of my 7th grade year, my eyes slowly bagen changing from blue (really blue) to green. It happens. PAUL LIVES! :D

  • There is NO Faul, only PAUL...1 Paul, and that's it!!

  • And in the second 1967 footage with the mustache I think he looks exactly the same as in the 1966 footage.

  • Honestly I think it's all in the difference in his hairstyle and the angle which they're filming him. Paul's hair in 1966 is much shorter and closer to his forehead, which covers up his forehead and goes over his eyebrows, making his head look smaller and less long. If you try to imagine the 1966 footage of paul with his longer, flipped up 1967 haircut he looks exactly the same.

  • "We were just trying to write songs about prostitutes and lesbians" xD

  • Paul is not DEAD you bloody GITS !!!!! He is very much alive and here makin music....

  • Paul is not DEAD you bloody GITS !!!!!

  • The 2nd interview he seems to have a crease in his face on both sides of his nose when he talks that isn't there in earlier interviews. He almost rolls his R's like a scotish person in the later interviews...fishy. Fake Paul Possible?..yes PLAUSIBLE?..ehh..

  • @MandyVin17

    Writing styles change , havent u noticed how their music changed by the Decade

  • I notice a lot of differences in mannerisms, etc, but really the writing style from 66 on is VERY different. I say this as a writer myself. Believe what you want though, as Faul says, it's a free COUNtry.

  • @thebeatles64100 Voice therapy..

    ; )

  • @thebeatles64100 the wonders of plastic surgery..

  • well, I love 66 Paul and 67 Paul both , no matter Paul's fat or thin , he looks so cute

  • How bout the fact that when "Paul" did his first solo album, they had footage of him playing right handed?

  • Hello...its called drugs, LSD and growing up

  • cigarette is in the right hand, paul is a lefty

    

  • @craigph20 I'm right-handed but sometimes I hold a cig in my left hand. I really doesn't proof anything

  • @craigph20 My mom is a lefty and she does somethings with her right hand and others with her left.

  • @girlsinhats6 me too :>

  • @craigph20 I'm right-handed and hold my ciggie in my left hand.

  • All Fauls on this video, not Paul, IMO. Compare to earlier interviews w/ the real Paul.

  • Look at the real Paul 1966 the way he talks and how many times he runs his tongue over his lips, a habit that some people have, and now to 1967 no tongue over the lips at all, people who have this kind of habit do not lose this. His whole way of talking and the facial expressions are completely different in 1966 than in 1967. Wow this is something else.

  • i might be imangining it but im sure his accent changes and his voice gets deeper. also he doesnt mumble as much as the early clips. but im sure it is paul!

  • o.0 Funny how he sounds different, looks different, and most of all, ACTS different..only from a years notice, not that much room to change, if I would say.

  • i know this much...at some point doubles were used. thats not the same mccartney. not at all. also there is a cover band called the fab four and the paul plays left handed bass and guitar and sounds ALOT like paul, its quite shocking. the multi million dollar beatles could find someone ten times better. the beatles did in fact put a lot of creepy shit in their albums, lyrics, artwork.

    they probably came up with the rumor,replaced him,made a lot of money(people bought a lot)and brought paul back

  • Ringo said at the end of "Strawberry Fields" "I'm very bored" but some people interpreted it as "I buried Paul". That was the beginning of the urban myth about Paul having died. Then on the "Magical Mystery Tour" made for BBC movie, during the song "Your Mother Should Know" Paul wore a red carnation, while the other bandmates wore white carnations, and then people said that was to signify that Paul was dead. The Beatles took it as a joke and played into it. But Paul never died, he's still alive

  • @TheChickenMoneyKing wrong. haha everything you said is wrong. first of all, john said in an interview that he was saying "cranberry sauuce" and his producer said he was saying this is paul meaning the guitar they used for the guitar and now you say ringo said that so there stories arent adding up...

    second the rumor started when a radio dj was told to play revolution backwards claiming it said "turn me on dead man."

    third the three beatles wore red carnations while paul wore a black one.

  • @TheChickenMoneyKing When you change the speed to 33 rpm, the "I buried Paul" is then audible...

  • -Find a sound-a-like

    -Give him surgery to look identical to Paul

    -Tech him to play and write left-handed (Not that difficult)

    -Put on a fake Liverpudian accent

    -Release the real Paul's unreleased songs until 1970

    -Hire studio musicians to prepare solo albums for you

    In all honesty, he wouldn't have been that difficult to replace. They were billionaires, remember.

  • AH you're very stupid if you can't see that it is the same Paul!!!!!!!!!! In 1966 the Beatles changed the looks..(sorry for my weird English, I'm not american/english...xD)

  • Paul is NOT dead......that's just lame!!! You cannot replace genius!!!!!!!!

  • It would be a miracle if they found a complete match to Paul, but I don't think it is possible. Those people were just trying to make a buck starting that rumor, then it went as far as the Beatles playing along and putting in fake clues on their albums. Paul is alive and well, this rumor is rubbish.

  • No way the current version of Paul is as funny as the real one.

  • Paul's hairline doesn't have a part and goes form left to right, while Faul has a part on the left side and his hair falls in a different direction.

  • same voice so....

  • Look theres aanother clue the 5th beatle member in the background alan Harrington

  • the nose changes- but maybe he got anose job in 67? it goes from being a "drop at the tip " to a "ski jump- upturned tip" between the two clips- the nose is different- but that not too strange in the enertainment field. He almost looks lebanese (his nose) in the early clip- looks very aryan in the later clip ( his nose).

  • We were just trying to write songs about prostitutes and lesbians thats all....the toppermost of the poppermost

  • his mustache looks fake at 6:00 lmao

  • Paul is not Paul

    Gandhi is not Gandhi

    Muhammed Ali is not Muhammed Ali

    John Lennon is not dead

    JFK wasnt shot

    and W. Bush is brillant!!

    if its on youtube it must be true....

  • Listen to both versions of yesterday live...

    the 1965 verions his voice is a tad lower then his 1966 version and they don't even look like the same person.

  • If you want to talk about difference, the biggest difference in Paul's appearance is between the Paul McCartney of 2000 and 2010.

  • it is really weird that after years of the same shit over and over and over and over and over again that they would get into something new things. right? as paul said in their last interview "the reason we're more serious now is because the questions, the times are more serious". really once you've moved from pop star to artist it's almost lowering yourself to respond to questions about whether your song is about a lesbian and a prostitute. he was also facing jail with the LSD statement.

  • this is back and forth between awesome paul, and awesome paul with third eye open cutting all the bullshit.

  • I can't believe anyone would even remotely think that Paul died and somehow after 40 some years no evidence would come forth.

    i mean, c'mon now......Paul McCartney has been alive and well.

  • The Paul off '66 was very quick and witty. Much more witty than the later Paul. The '66 Paul has more of an intelligent twinkle in his eye than the later one. Later Paul speaks in a labouring, meandering way (I have found this trait up to present day); the early Paul is a class act. Having looked at all the evidence here on You Tube for the conspiracy (plentiful and intriguing), finding this brilliant video really has fueled the suspicion for me. Thank you.

  • @wazzer100 Oh, heck, you could say the same thing about John's personality. He was so witty and light-hearted in the early days and, IMO, became more sardonic later. You don't think the fame circus and death of Epstein took a toll on the group? They all changed and evolved, as well as their music, with Sgt. Pepper and the use of LSD.

  • @VonFisch1 Yeah ok understand your point of view. Then Paul was changed irreperably in my opinion which is a shame. Obviously you do not subscribe to the PID conspiracy so fair enough, but for me it is another piece of evidence for this. Clues littered throughout the artwork and the music ? Seemingly physical changes in Paul, as well as, as shown in this vid, changes in his personality ? Ok fine it is your shout man... Too much strangeness and too much smoke for no fire for my liking.

  • I don't care if you believe they are the same or different, I just want you to know that the video on "paul" today is him talking to the interviewer about DRUGS! The interviewer puts it in plain view at 4:14 The interviewer: "Do you think you have encouraged people to take drugs?" Paul HIMSELF even says, "It doesn't matter wether I've done it or not." They are talking about drugs! This has nothing to do with the supposed, "Paul is Dead" thing.

  • Everyone who says that Paul aged naturally and that's why his face looks thinner, etc...Paul went from having brown eyes to green eyes and the natural part in his hair changed direction. He also went from wearing a size 8 shoe to a size 9 1/2 as well as growing three inches in height. How do you explain all that if it's just natural aging?

  • @davidioanfan I just took a look at a picture from Paul in his early Beatles days and a picture of him in Wings, his eye colour hasn't really changed.

  • @davidioanfan how on earth do you know these tiny details? sounds susiciously like bullshit to me :)

  • @davidioanfan holy smokes ive heard this theory and its the biggest bunch of shit ive heard in a while...that paul "died", my god get real.

  • @davidioanfan FAUL.

  • @davidioanfan

    Oh... so were you there to look into his eyes and see the colour change? or did these black and white interviews just just look slightly different? And did you personally see his varying shoe sizes? or did you read that on some stupid gossipy website? were you there with a tape measure to measure that apparent growth? or was that from the same source as the eye colour and shoe size thing? don't be so gullible!

  • @davidioanfan He aged and that's what happens!! Get a life....

  • @davidioanfan ...call everyone crazy..but yeah....my eyes change from blue and green, the part in your hair can change....it is no means "natural" i would know cos i've changed it a lot, and you can grow...as hard as it seems it is possible...

  • its totally a different person-

  • vali are you greek?

  • ''they'' only look different b/c in 67 was after he started doing drugs, people change after they do drugs,

  • @sodapophunter  Drugs can't change the shape of his head or his height,

  • that ear sticks out too much in the 1967 interview obviously a prostetic

  • i dont get it... paul seems the same to me. Just as lovable as always =)

  • dead or not who knows but that's not the same person

  • @sahajrob yes you are right, One paul has a rounder face than the other one, Drugs can't change that.

  • It's two different people.

  • he does aound slightly diff' but u can tell by his teeth, the teeth r the same.

  • paul is alive!

  • 6:50

    faul sounds so hesitant here. The new so far out featle...

  • They sound the same, talk the same, act the same, sing the same, look the same, are both left-handed, and both wrote amazing songs....

    VERY, VERY unlikely that they are two different people. Paul never died. And as for the "real" Paul being more relaxed and joking than the "fake" one, he could easily be in different moods at the time and he's not around the others, which could loosen him up.