Added: 1 year ago
From: statslectures
Views: 3,528
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I watched this because I have a test on this tomorrow. After watching it, I realized just how fucked I am.

  • @Mattthornz

    That's rough. Send me an email if you have any questions and I'll try to answer them.

  • Hi. Thank you for these videos. I just have a question. When I solved this via the Ti-84, the equation of the linear regression I got was y= 1320.53X - 6627.65. Is there a reason for the discrepancy? Thanks again. I really appreciate all your videos.

  • @J0se4Jesus

    Any discrepancy is likely due to how I performed the rounding. Calculators can hold almost every digit required for the calculation in memory, while as a human I usually round to 2-4 decimal places (although, the difference between "6627.65" and "6499.51" is kind of big, so I'll double-check my calculations when I get the chance).

  • When your finding B1. Why when solving for Sx and Sy do you put the equation above N-1. What is the N-1 there for? It wasn't in the problem when you did Pearson's correlation.

  • @zhunterzz1

    n - 1 represents the degrees of freedom when calculating standard deviation (Sx and Sy). The bottom parts of the Pearson's r equation are not Sx and Sy, but are actually Sums of Squares (SSx and SSy). Sums of Squares in this equation don't have degrees of freedom.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more