was one of the Greatest violinists of the 19th-century, a performer of impeccable technique and complete artistic integrity-not for him were the flashy crowd-thrilling antics of some 19th-century virtuosos.
wow! Fantastic performance from 1903!!! Thank you aimson for sharing this video.
aimson Many greetings and thanks from Lima, Perú, for this direct window to the past. Indeed, in the very last fraction of second it seems tome to hear the voice of Joachim or someone else. It seems, also, that, by the restrictions caused by the time limits of the phonograph, Joachim is obliged to abridge the crotchets (the long notes). I have read about the rivalry between Joachim & Wieniawski. W criticized J of lack of technique. J criticized W of excess of it. Thanks again!
He actually uses inegale and the odd over-dotting! Much more "baroque" than I expected, along with less vibrato and a really nice fluid sense of improvistion. The portamento is usually considered more 19th cent. but it would be interesting to know how far back this technique goes.
Love this rendition.What I find very admirable in the old masters is that they did not fear their intonation losing its fire and emotion at quick tempos.Today's violinsts think "slow tempos evoke emotion,fast ones don't".This is prime evidence for the contrary!
My living breathing Heavens! Such honesty, such meek honesty! Every phrase was voiced only for the idea. A man employing his instrument in servitude of something beyond himself. We never needed romanticism. Here's one demonstration of that!
Talking of fingers of the left hand,by the time Joachim made this(unsurpassed)recording,he was suffering severe arthritis of the hands-with one of the fingers of his left hand being permanently mis-shapen. One can only daydream about how magnificent his chaconne must have been.
certainly not on the left hand! and most definitely not my finger! in all seriousness, i would kill to go back in time, in order to have had the opportunity to study with this great teacher... well maybe not kill, but somebody may have to lose a finger, from what i hear.
Joachim's style in certain respects reminds me of present-day "historically informed" violinists - pure tone, minimal vibrato, an excellent sense of beat and note hierarchy. What an amazing portal into performance practice of a hundred years ago.
lisen to the puarity of the tone..can it get more beautiful than that..no vibrato at all..absoliutly great..no one can tuch him exept one Violinist (Paul de Keyser) not fameus but The Greatest. :) I am crying my eyes out of this performance so great..
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
do you speak in serious? How is it possible, that the people stop listening when it comes to listen to the most famous one? The truth is, that nowadays there are so many (completely unknown) violinists that are much better then Joachim in his best time. But the record surely does not reflect his best time. By the way- I like this recording very much.
Interesting characteristics: rounded, organ-like full chords; noble, reverential playing; very sustained line; little vibrato; a few notes diverge from current Bach performance.
This is a wonderful performance, even by todays incredibly high standards.
Joseph Joachim did much to keep the Solo Bach Violin Sonatas alive in his day. He performed them often and published his own edition of the works, which is widely used today,
Pultroppo questo è Joachim alla fine della vita, quindi l'esecuzione è davvero scarsa.Comunque la grandezza di Joachim si capisce di più nell' esecuzione della romanza in Do.Documento importante che ci fa capire come si suonasse nell'800. Poco vibrato e non grande suono, ma fraseggio bellissimo e dolcissimo, con bei portamenti. Grazie per queste registrazioni.
i like hearing players who are legends now its good stuff...you should post the sarasate and ysaye recordings they are intresting too. listening to them makes me want to go practice
that is ridiculous. this is a rare chance to actually hear the man Brahms and others wrote his concerto for. i might mention in passing that Joachim was old and very arthritic at this point in his life, so his playing was not what it once was...
Funnily enough, the violinists of before the age of recordings were inferior technically to those of after the advent of recording, as they were unable to listen to their own playing from the "audience" point-of-view.
Joachim in his later years was able to witness the birth of recording and recorded some music for us to hear. It's obvious that he was a great violinist, but Joachim did burst into tears upon first hearing himself on record...
Did he really burst into tears upon first hearing himself? Where did you learn that? That's interesting, I think he sounds amazing, particularly in the hungarian dance, i mean, I'm sure he didn't actually sound like THIS, the terrible technology probably only picked up like 1/10 of his tone. But in terms of phrasing and musicality I think he was incredible.
A friend of mine owns a collection of books on the subject of the older violinists, and he read it in one of them. An odd collection to have for a boy, but whatever.
Joachim was obviously a great violinist, but I think it's understandable that he cried. I often find that a recording of me playing is marred by problems that I didn't realize I had when I was performing. It almost always was worse than I thought it would be. This would've been compounded in Joachim's case dut to very bad quality.
I didn't mean to be derogatory at all to Mr. Joachim, as it's clear through the precious recordings he left us that he was a great violinist in an age in which style, interpretation, and individuality was placed on the same level of importance as technique. I just wanted to say that technique in general was inferior then compared to now. However, I do think the fiddlers today leave something to be desired in other aspects of violin, and personally would rather stick with the greats of the past.
I disagree. Just because he wasn't vibrato crazy like the violinists of today does not make him "inferior" in technique. Don't forget, he IS the father of modern violin technique.
I disagree. Just because he was vibrato crazy like the violinists of today does not make him "inferior" in technique. Don't forget, he IS the father of modern violin technique.
@GreatPianists The downside of this, is that some violinists became so obsessed with making "perfect" recordings, that they would record many takes and then patch them together in the mastering process.This often leads to very flat recordings. David Oistrach was one such violinist,sometimes releasing recordings that were selected from (sometimes) hundreds of takes.Oistrach's live recordings are superlative,if containing errors; his studio ones are "perfect" but often dull.
This has been flagged as spam show
Joseph Joachim(1831-1907)
was one of the Greatest violinists of the 19th-century, a performer of impeccable technique and complete artistic integrity-not for him were the flashy crowd-thrilling antics of some 19th-century virtuosos.
wow! Fantastic performance from 1903!!! Thank you aimson for sharing this video.
MrGer2295 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrGer2295 4 months ago
Comment removed
MrGer2295 4 months ago
aimson Many greetings and thanks from Lima, Perú, for this direct window to the past. Indeed, in the very last fraction of second it seems tome to hear the voice of Joachim or someone else. It seems, also, that, by the restrictions caused by the time limits of the phonograph, Joachim is obliged to abridge the crotchets (the long notes). I have read about the rivalry between Joachim & Wieniawski. W criticized J of lack of technique. J criticized W of excess of it. Thanks again!
musicaenlaniebla 5 months ago
Dude this is amazing! You wouldn't happen to have any recordings of Paganini playing his del Gesu would you???
mhaley101 6 months ago
@mhaley101
paganini was born and died, sadly, before the light bulb was invented...let alone recording...
GuidedFireWind 5 months ago
jesus christ... thank you so much... I had no idea recordings of Joachim even existed.
fryfry377 1 year ago
He actually uses inegale and the odd over-dotting! Much more "baroque" than I expected, along with less vibrato and a really nice fluid sense of improvistion. The portamento is usually considered more 19th cent. but it would be interesting to know how far back this technique goes.
Fantasiaispam 1 year ago
It's absolute beauty. All the meaning in the history of music. And the recording from vinyl makes it even more perfect. Thank you aimson.
aggelosf1 1 year ago
Love this rendition.What I find very admirable in the old masters is that they did not fear their intonation losing its fire and emotion at quick tempos.Today's violinsts think "slow tempos evoke emotion,fast ones don't".This is prime evidence for the contrary!
HeifetzRanew 1 year ago
Thanks for taking care of business, aimson!!!
outoftunefiddler 1 year ago
Many thanks aimson for uploading these tracks of Joachim. Great stuff!!
NiallMS 1 year ago
My living breathing Heavens! Such honesty, such meek honesty! Every phrase was voiced only for the idea. A man employing his instrument in servitude of something beyond himself. We never needed romanticism. Here's one demonstration of that!
Ascendyourthinking 1 year ago
Yuval Yaron, Heifetz, Grumiaux
BrainyOlbap 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am sorry to say such a thing, but anyone playing Bach compared to Szeryng seems just like an amateur
sad but true
crazy77town 2 years ago
Talking of fingers of the left hand,by the time Joachim made this(unsurpassed)recording,he was suffering severe arthritis of the hands-with one of the fingers of his left hand being permanently mis-shapen. One can only daydream about how magnificent his chaconne must have been.
shiveringflower 2 years ago
i would give a finger to have heard this in person. not on my left hand though.
hipser 2 years ago 3
certainly not on the left hand! and most definitely not my finger! in all seriousness, i would kill to go back in time, in order to have had the opportunity to study with this great teacher... well maybe not kill, but somebody may have to lose a finger, from what i hear.
appletreemusic1 2 years ago
@hipser LOL "not on my left hand." :P
Dagrehn 1 year ago
Thanks for Recording this great music!
it sounds really amazing and not bad. i love this feel.
ChocolaMeiure 2 years ago
This is history written in the form of sound. Magnifico!
nirna1986 2 years ago 2
Joachim's style in certain respects reminds me of present-day "historically informed" violinists - pure tone, minimal vibrato, an excellent sense of beat and note hierarchy. What an amazing portal into performance practice of a hundred years ago.
michaelmartind 2 years ago 4
Thanks for posting! Man, what a trip.
felixmendelssohn 2 years ago
lisen to the puarity of the tone..can it get more beautiful than that..no vibrato at all..absoliutly great..no one can tuch him exept one Violinist (Paul de Keyser) not fameus but The Greatest. :) I am crying my eyes out of this performance so great..
emarkov 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
do you speak in serious? How is it possible, that the people stop listening when it comes to listen to the most famous one? The truth is, that nowadays there are so many (completely unknown) violinists that are much better then Joachim in his best time. But the record surely does not reflect his best time. By the way- I like this recording very much.
violaafan 2 years ago
Truly an historic recording. Thank you!
Interesting characteristics: rounded, organ-like full chords; noble, reverential playing; very sustained line; little vibrato; a few notes diverge from current Bach performance.
opus4 2 years ago
i do believe this recording will haunt me for the rest of my life. absolutely beautiful.
albachteng 3 years ago 3
lol this is the Joachim who was a friend of brahms. ancient recording
seahyimin 3 years ago 2
This is a wonderful performance, even by todays incredibly high standards.
Joseph Joachim did much to keep the Solo Bach Violin Sonatas alive in his day. He performed them often and published his own edition of the works, which is widely used today,
kcak123 3 years ago
Thanks for posting this. Truly a piece of history.
FAHayek89 3 years ago 2
This is excellent!
alou64 3 years ago
Pultroppo questo è Joachim alla fine della vita, quindi l'esecuzione è davvero scarsa.Comunque la grandezza di Joachim si capisce di più nell' esecuzione della romanza in Do.Documento importante che ci fa capire come si suonasse nell'800. Poco vibrato e non grande suono, ma fraseggio bellissimo e dolcissimo, con bei portamenti. Grazie per queste registrazioni.
maurice0773 3 years ago
So amazing !!!!. thank you very much for sharing this so unique video !!!!. Cheers!!!, ~Sergio.
ottokees 3 years ago 3
Thanks so much for posting this.
atombomb67 3 years ago 4
Gyönyörű!
He is a hungarian violinist!
pannonia20 3 years ago 2
Egészen pontosan magyar zsidó, ugyebár. :)
likemyviolin 3 years ago
he makes such unpredictable breaks
in between chords.
its so different from what i hear nowadays.
holyknight234 4 years ago
siktir lan
EBENISIKIMAMCIK 4 years ago
Sometimes I hear the notes of a Viola (eg C below middle)?
He's one of the best I've ever heard. Anyone got recordings of Paganini?
Jextxadore 4 years ago
no unfortunatly they don't haev recordings of paganini
violaplayer1995 4 years ago
whose he?
violaplayer1995 4 years ago
i like hearing players who are legends now its good stuff...you should post the sarasate and ysaye recordings they are intresting too. listening to them makes me want to go practice
ravelmeister 4 years ago
I posted the filtered versions of Sarasate's recordings.
Jextxadore 4 years ago
If only Joachim lived in the Youtube generation....
happpiday 4 years ago
Nice Work putting This on WEB! Thank you. it is a chance i wouldn't get esle! Thank you!
cirtan 4 years ago
5 estrelas!
bernardocox2 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
so fucking horrible!
govibe 5 years ago
Ehehe... go back to watching American Idol rejects, that's all you are probably able to "appreciate."
aimson 5 years ago 7
It is horrible. Not because the way he plays )probably) but because of the recording quality.
firebreathone 5 years ago
Probably? If you can't tell that Joachim was an amazing violinist despite this terrible sound quality then you might as well just quit
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
hahahhahhahah!
bernardocox2 4 years ago
that is ridiculous. this is a rare chance to actually hear the man Brahms and others wrote his concerto for. i might mention in passing that Joachim was old and very arthritic at this point in his life, so his playing was not what it once was...
robinscott33 5 years ago 3
Yes, I agree with all you say! And we can listen how he intended the phrasing of this piece!
ocramizz 3 years ago
Funnily enough, the violinists of before the age of recordings were inferior technically to those of after the advent of recording, as they were unable to listen to their own playing from the "audience" point-of-view.
Joachim in his later years was able to witness the birth of recording and recorded some music for us to hear. It's obvious that he was a great violinist, but Joachim did burst into tears upon first hearing himself on record...
GreatPianists 4 years ago 4
Did he really burst into tears upon first hearing himself? Where did you learn that? That's interesting, I think he sounds amazing, particularly in the hungarian dance, i mean, I'm sure he didn't actually sound like THIS, the terrible technology probably only picked up like 1/10 of his tone. But in terms of phrasing and musicality I think he was incredible.
AbsoluteZ3R0 4 years ago
A friend of mine owns a collection of books on the subject of the older violinists, and he read it in one of them. An odd collection to have for a boy, but whatever.
Joachim was obviously a great violinist, but I think it's understandable that he cried. I often find that a recording of me playing is marred by problems that I didn't realize I had when I was performing. It almost always was worse than I thought it would be. This would've been compounded in Joachim's case dut to very bad quality.
GreatPianists 4 years ago 3
I only listen to recordings of myself if I'm feeling masochistic :)
sonata1992 4 years ago
The man was 70 years old! Give him a break.
Hopfensperger 4 years ago 2
I didn't mean to be derogatory at all to Mr. Joachim, as it's clear through the precious recordings he left us that he was a great violinist in an age in which style, interpretation, and individuality was placed on the same level of importance as technique. I just wanted to say that technique in general was inferior then compared to now. However, I do think the fiddlers today leave something to be desired in other aspects of violin, and personally would rather stick with the greats of the past.
GreatPianists 4 years ago 7
Comment removed
tlcooper93 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I disagree. Just because he wasn't vibrato crazy like the violinists of today does not make him "inferior" in technique. Don't forget, he IS the father of modern violin technique.
tlcooper93 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I disagree. Just because he was vibrato crazy like the violinists of today does not make him "inferior" in technique. Don't forget, he IS the father of modern violin technique.
tlcooper93 10 months ago
@GreatPianists The downside of this, is that some violinists became so obsessed with making "perfect" recordings, that they would record many takes and then patch them together in the mastering process.This often leads to very flat recordings. David Oistrach was one such violinist,sometimes releasing recordings that were selected from (sometimes) hundreds of takes.Oistrach's live recordings are superlative,if containing errors; his studio ones are "perfect" but often dull.
shiveringflower 1 year ago