SPOILERS!! I enjoyed this movie although the end where she realises that guy is one of them is a an annoyingly large plot hole. Also, how did Lars survive? We don't know and they don't tell us, kind of feels like a cheap trick. And WTF was up with those credits at the end? Wtf. Only other complaint was the title, why not call it The Thing: Beginning or something, its not a remake at all like I thought it was! Worth watching if you watched the original I think.
@Edbrad I´m gonna try and answer all your questions baes on what the director himself explanined and some script reads. First off though Carpenter´s classic from 1982 was not the original "the thing from another world" from 1951 is.
Lars was knocked out by Jameson or Carter when he came to he hid until the storm cleared which is smart. The credits at the end is an "arc" or "story-bridge" if you will to tie the 1982 movie together nicely with this movie since this movie is a PREQUEL. =)
@TheThingPrequel JC's film wasnt a remake of the thing from another planet, the thing from another planet was basicly frankenstien in the snow. it just gave him an idea. the movie was acutally based off a book called i see you. i think thats the name
@Carmine2825 JC´s movie WAS a remake since the movie "the thing from another world" from 1951 had already been made from the book "who goes there" However JC´s movie stayed more true to the book which is why it is being considered "original" since it was so far off from the 1951 movie. I Never talk about JC´s movie as the original or the remake I use the term "CLASSIC" is has a better ring to it. :)
@TheThingPrequel thats the book who goes there not i see you haha xD well either way. but seriously i wanna know when the hell carter got infected, i figured everyone else out but him! because she said he was human when he got back to camp so when did he get infected please help me!
@Edbrad please explain why you thought it was such a plothole with the whole kate and guy realasing he was a thing. Ill give you point for the complaint to the title though. THE THING.... it´s just weird why they used the same title. should have been called "someTHING" or just THING
@343xbv The fact that Lars wasnt able to stop the dog/Thing doesnt mean he couldnt shoot. Bullets cant stop the Thing, its a shapeshifter. At best it could slow it down. As far as the grenade goes, he has gloves on, its been a long night, and the grenade Lars was using was a thermite grenade....which are not meant for throwing. (Look it up).
@BigBadassR yea i get wut ur sayin but if it requries that much of an explanation than my previous statement couldn't have been too far fetched. in any case, u don't gotta defend him to me or anyone else cuz the prequel portrayed him as a badass, and for all intents and purposes he was.
I've always wondered why a science team working in the arctic would be issued flame throwers. They appear to be standard issue though, the Norwegian and US teams both have them!
@canigetanoorah Flamethrowers are a very effective way to get snow out of the away fast and quickly melting ice build-up in front of a door or snowcats/tractors. It´s true look it up. :)
I like how the thing's behavior is a little different when it came to assimilating humans, at first it was real sloppy then by the the time it was at outpost 31 it was almost perfect at the behavior
i saw this movie but i didnt see the ending because i made a new girlfriend and this changed my life <3 i love her and this movie did change my life after it came out
I saw the movie two days ago and I loved it. It's better than the first only b/c movie making today is more sophisticated. I will see it again before it comes out on DVD. (It would be nice to see them make part three. We need to see who survived.)
@CapitanJusticia The creature SPFX in the first movie were not that good, but it was still a solid movie. I liked the creature SPFX in the second more. Just my personal opinion. Both movies are better than the original from 1950. The story is based on a book from 1938. I have not been able to get my hands on a copy. Peace.
I like how the it's not 100% CGI and how the actress used her voice to make that sound. I already know this movie is gointg to be AMAZING!! Mary Elizabeth is awesome too.
I love how that Thing at 5:27 to 8:22 is all practical effects and it looks real! I really hope that go for more of that than the CGI that we've seen in the trailers. Can't Wait!
@butterfly153239 Too true. But hey, I'm actually surprised that they lit that Thing at 10:50 on FIRE! Actual FIRE! Not CGI fire! which is pretty damn awesome.
lololololololol Adam ditching at 10:55.....if only you did that with the Edvard thing T_T
LtActionCam 3 weeks ago
SPOILERS!! I enjoyed this movie although the end where she realises that guy is one of them is a an annoyingly large plot hole. Also, how did Lars survive? We don't know and they don't tell us, kind of feels like a cheap trick. And WTF was up with those credits at the end? Wtf. Only other complaint was the title, why not call it The Thing: Beginning or something, its not a remake at all like I thought it was! Worth watching if you watched the original I think.
Edbrad 2 months ago
@Edbrad I´m gonna try and answer all your questions baes on what the director himself explanined and some script reads. First off though Carpenter´s classic from 1982 was not the original "the thing from another world" from 1951 is.
Lars was knocked out by Jameson or Carter when he came to he hid until the storm cleared which is smart. The credits at the end is an "arc" or "story-bridge" if you will to tie the 1982 movie together nicely with this movie since this movie is a PREQUEL. =)
TheThingPrequel 1 month ago
@TheThingPrequel JC's film wasnt a remake of the thing from another planet, the thing from another planet was basicly frankenstien in the snow. it just gave him an idea. the movie was acutally based off a book called i see you. i think thats the name
Carmine2825 3 weeks ago
@Carmine2825 JC´s movie WAS a remake since the movie "the thing from another world" from 1951 had already been made from the book "who goes there" However JC´s movie stayed more true to the book which is why it is being considered "original" since it was so far off from the 1951 movie. I Never talk about JC´s movie as the original or the remake I use the term "CLASSIC" is has a better ring to it. :)
TheThingPrequel 3 weeks ago
@TheThingPrequel thats the book who goes there not i see you haha xD well either way. but seriously i wanna know when the hell carter got infected, i figured everyone else out but him! because she said he was human when he got back to camp so when did he get infected please help me!
Carmine2825 3 weeks ago
@Carmine2825 The story was "Who Goes There" by Joseph Campbell (not sure of the first name) back around 1930 or so.
Spyderblade001 1 week ago
@Edbrad please explain why you thought it was such a plothole with the whole kate and guy realasing he was a thing. Ill give you point for the complaint to the title though. THE THING.... it´s just weird why they used the same title. should have been called "someTHING" or just THING
TheThingPrequel 1 month ago
i like the ending wen she figured out that he was one wen she asked him a trick question
lilmohawk15 2 months ago
this movie is awesome.go see it.
hart2316 2 months ago
Lars owned this film, it sucks that he ends up getting shot in the head by a crappy old guy who's lame enough to get tied to a 'FUCKING COUCH!'
SentinelTera 3 months ago
@SentinelTera at least that old guy could shoot! lars was a badass but he couldn't shoot, throw grenades, or speak english
343xbv 2 months ago
@343xbv The fact that Lars wasnt able to stop the dog/Thing doesnt mean he couldnt shoot. Bullets cant stop the Thing, its a shapeshifter. At best it could slow it down. As far as the grenade goes, he has gloves on, its been a long night, and the grenade Lars was using was a thermite grenade....which are not meant for throwing. (Look it up).
BigBadassR 1 month ago
@BigBadassR yea i get wut ur sayin but if it requries that much of an explanation than my previous statement couldn't have been too far fetched. in any case, u don't gotta defend him to me or anyone else cuz the prequel portrayed him as a badass, and for all intents and purposes he was.
343xbv 1 month ago
I've always wondered why a science team working in the arctic would be issued flame throwers. They appear to be standard issue though, the Norwegian and US teams both have them!
canigetanoorah 3 months ago
@canigetanoorah Flamethrowers are a very effective way to get snow out of the away fast and quickly melting ice build-up in front of a door or snowcats/tractors. It´s true look it up. :)
TheThingPrequel 3 months ago
@canigetanoorah Ah yes of course! They're good for getting snow off of your snow boots too! :D
canigetanoorah 3 months ago
@canigetanoorah lol well i would maybe not recommend that but ok :P
TheThingPrequel 3 months ago
13:30 this is the split face's scene?
Pleague666 3 months ago
What did they make the tentacles of the scorched body out of
theawsomechanneldude 4 months ago
5:59 It does not look like Blair thing but more like a giant crab-spider.
Nightfox00rougehero 4 months ago
@Nightfox00rougehero that's because this is a prequel, not a sequel
M41Awesomeness 3 months ago
@M41Awesomeness I KNOW its a prequel! Im saying this to all who said it looked like Blair monster.
Nightfox00rougehero 3 months ago
@Nightfox00rougehero oh ok :P
M41Awesomeness 3 months ago
loved the movie, except the spaceship scene at the end, that just ruined it for me.
i liked it better when you didnt know what that was inside, but its still a great movie
RobinAndScaredWookie 4 months ago
I like how the thing's behavior is a little different when it came to assimilating humans, at first it was real sloppy then by the the time it was at outpost 31 it was almost perfect at the behavior
xShadowxPhoenix 4 months ago
The movie was great, my favorite scene though was the scene with Kate and Juliette great chase scene.
GolemSoldierNo15 4 months ago 9
That's a job that takes guts.
vernii 4 months ago
i saw this movie but i didnt see the ending because i made a new girlfriend and this changed my life <3 i love her and this movie did change my life after it came out
OMGJONATHAN 4 months ago
The full body burns looked pretty kick-ass!!
RDdaNINJA 4 months ago
I saw the movie two days ago and I loved it. It's better than the first only b/c movie making today is more sophisticated. I will see it again before it comes out on DVD. (It would be nice to see them make part three. We need to see who survived.)
mmfmmf332 4 months ago
@mmfmmf332 Better than the first? No way!
CapitanJusticia 4 months ago
@CapitanJusticia The creature SPFX in the first movie were not that good, but it was still a solid movie. I liked the creature SPFX in the second more. Just my personal opinion. Both movies are better than the original from 1950. The story is based on a book from 1938. I have not been able to get my hands on a copy. Peace.
mmfmmf332 4 months ago
@mmfmmf332 You know nothing about special effects...
vivalaminion 4 months ago
Ah cool can't wait to see it on Friday
Samsodomy 4 months ago
Are you going to post 2-4?
Samsodomy 4 months ago
@Samsodomy I took part 1,2,3 & 4 and cut them altogether. Each part was aprox 4 min long.
The finished product is what you see here. :)
TheThingPrequel 4 months ago 7
@ 8:26 it sounds like cpt.Price from Mw2 lol
ToonsifyToon 4 months ago
@ToonsifyToon More like Gaz's voice : D
mangaka350 4 months ago
I find it amusing how the Thing after being ignited just casually walks past them into the other room.... Then it dies.
Flarepy 5 months ago
@Flarepy Well, in the original, the Thing casually burt though the wall after being ignited and collapsed into the snow before exploding.
Hewylewis 5 months ago in playlist More videos from TheThingPrequel
@Hewylewis It's good that the Thing is so casual, otherwise it might get caught.
Flarepy 5 months ago
@Flarepy That's what it did in the 1982 version before it gets blowen up.
kezadrone 4 months ago
Wow, the pilot really is almost completely insect-like! SWEET!
MyceliaProductions42 5 months ago
I like how the it's not 100% CGI and how the actress used her voice to make that sound. I already know this movie is gointg to be AMAZING!! Mary Elizabeth is awesome too.
GolemSoldierNo15 5 months ago
I didn't know this thing that was frozen in the block of ice is a inspect like thing.
Gothiczartan 5 months ago
10:03 and onward - SQUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!
Lisutbg 5 months ago
get back in the kitchen ! 10:45 and make me a roast. 10:54
TheBlackdago 5 months ago
I love how that Thing at 5:27 to 8:22 is all practical effects and it looks real! I really hope that go for more of that than the CGI that we've seen in the trailers. Can't Wait!
TheShadowedOne1 5 months ago
@TheShadowedOne1 ya hopefully they have another dog scene too, but if it's all CGI in that scene my ass is walking out of the theater!
butterfly153239 5 months ago
@butterfly153239 Too true. But hey, I'm actually surprised that they lit that Thing at 10:50 on FIRE! Actual FIRE! Not CGI fire! which is pretty damn awesome.
TheShadowedOne1 5 months ago
@TheShadowedOne1 ya
butterfly153239 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
8:30 Did you hear him? He said OUTPOST 31!!!!!!!!! I CAN'T WAIT FOR THIS FILM TO COME OUT!!!
JFraser360 5 months ago