Why doesn't God make itself not exist? Why won't God make a being more powerful than itself so it can see what it's like to be pushed around, lorded over & abused? Were God's parents abusive? Why didn't God make penises hide inside the body when not in use? Why can't God breathe underwater? Where did God learn how to make a universe? When God wakes, will we all disappear? How can God know it wasn't created by a higher power? How can that higher power know it wasn't created by a higher power?
With number 8, are you saying that the christ part isn't in the bible or are you saying there is no mention of jesus at all. Make sure you're also reading the new testament. We are all sinners, it never tells us to go killing and raping, where the hell does it say that. It may be a parody or whatever but it makes no sense. These are all terrible statements. I mean almost anyone could have come up with better arguments.First of all we have no relation to mud. relatives have to have life.
@Gnug215 My guess is it's a parody on some of the arguments against Creationism but you seem to have chosen the very weakest ones and fabricated your own.
@markchamplive1 It's actually a parody of arguments USED by Creationists (against evolution/atheism/whatever).
The ones in this video are, of course, entirely fabricated to look just as ridiculous and misinformed as some of those arguments that you often see, called something like "10 questions for atheists/evolutionists".
Mind you, it was hard work coming up with such stupid questions for this video. I even had to collect suggestions from a forum.
one quick question to all atheists, evolutionists and general anti-creationists. Your scientific theory suggests that matter and anti matter collided to cause the big bang. The entire universe was filled with antimatter and matter prior to this. The universe is now full of matter, where has the anti-matter disappeared to? When creationists say they believe in God you guys say "prove it, show me God". Ok, so prove it to me now, "show me anti-matter!"
@KiprosPAO I'd argue that atheist arguing against God by using the Big Bang theory are doing it wrong. The Big Bang theory is just a theory that explains what cosmology and astronomy are observing. These observations conflict with "creation" being 6 or 10 thousand years old. That is what the argument is about. You can still be a creationist (just not a YEC) and accept that the universe is 13.7billion years old. Then no problem.
@Gnug215 Christianity doesn't necessarily argue against the universe being billions of years old. I had a very interesting convo with a guy on youtube that explained this in detail. There are two places in The Bible where it says one day for God is as a thousand years for us. That isn't meant to be taken literally but shows that God's time isn't measured as ours is. For instance, if "God's kingdom" is another planet then time on that planet would be different, depending on it's rotation/orbit
@KiprosPAO Yes, which is why I'm specifically targetting Creationism in this video (although granted, common ground is touched on in my vid since I'm using the Bible as the main driver in my parody).
What I'm specifically parodying is those "10 questions to evilutionists" type videos you see around the place. In those videos, the "source" (which in this parody is the Bible) is being so violated and contorted, that it's almost funny.
@KiprosPAO Hi, first, sorry for the late reply. Some notification mails got lost in the shuffle.
Now, I wouldn't describe myself as an atheist or evolutionist, but I can assure you that neither of those two have the Big Bang theory as a prerequisite for their viewpoints.
As for the Big Bang, it's the current prevailing cosmological theory on why the universe looks like it does today. Scientists can trace the evidence all the way back to the "Bang", but not beyond, so there is still mystery.
@KiprosPAO (continued) I'd also argue that anyone asking for "proof of God" is doing something wrong. What you want to ask for is evidence. And well, there is a lot of evidence that supports the Big Bang theory. I suggest you look it up. You could always start on Wikipedia.
As for anti-matter itself, it is easily produced, and has even been detected naturally.
As for the universe, if the amount and force in matter and anti-matter were equal at the "Bang", we wouldn't be here.
@KiprosPAO this is in response to a post of yours made 9 months ago... No our current theory isn't that the big bang was created by a collision of matter and antimatter, just to clear up, the big bang was NOT i repeat NOT an explosion but a rapid expansion of space and time. There is also still antimatter around just not the same amount as there is matter. And for the final kick-in-the-teeth scientists have made anti-hydrogen. Look this stuff up if you're going to use it.
Sorry, I know this is parody, but I dont get who you are defending. You are making pointless points that neither side has EVER made. If you are defending atheism, which it doesnt seem that you are since you play an atheist, it makes no sense. If you defend theism, you are stating questions no atheist have ever asked.
@gulbirk It's a little contorted, I know, but here's what I'm doing: I'm criticizing creationists/theists, by parodying some of the questions they sometimes ask us.
Questions, such as: "If evolution is true, how come there are still monkeys?"
Or, "Explosions destroy things, so how could the Big Bang create what we see today?"
Those kind of questions are nonsensical and non-sequiteurs, so I decided to return in kind, see what they think of that. (So far, none of them get it.)
@gulbirk Hehe, I'm glad you do. Like I said, it's a bit contrived, but I was getting reaaaally tired of all those nonsencial questions you see all over the place, like "10 questions evolutionists must answer!" and stuff like that.
@Gnug215 My favourite one is the video called """10 questions evolutionists cant answer""" (or something like that). And then, the first question is ""Why are the planets round?""". LOL
Whats really funny is that religious folks are serious when they do that very same thing about science or anyone that does not believe in what they believe in.
@seeker6789 That is indeed what this parody is making fun of. Sadly, and perhaps expectedly, the religious people that it's directed at that have responded so far haven't gotten the joke.
Nice. I'd never heard of D-K effect, but so true. ...and to be fair, I suspect we would agree that that type of personality can be found in a variety of settings. This is interesting, but it occurs to me; I think if you read the gospels you would see that you and Jesus have a significant common trait: you are not at all worried about offending religious people. :)
@dostol3701 Oh, this can be found in a LOT of places. For instance, I think many on the non-believer side felt that Thunderf00t made himself guilty of this when he delved into "theology" in some of his vids.
Heh, I guess in that respect I also have something in common with Jesus, in that we're essentially asking for humility. But yeah, religion needs to be treated more irreverantly, but not specifically religious people: just those that, well, deserve it.
Very good. I think you must know something about the bible to make such nonesensical questions. Really funny, and good point. I'd like to be able to talk about evolution as a theory of origins, for example, but I'm not so well informed. I mostly have questions. I guess as a creationist I should end with the obligatory, "Repent ye heathen, lest I call down fire from on high to consume theeee!" So I thinks that covers it.
@dostol3701 It was actually really hard to come up with. I even made a thread on a forum asking for suggestions, and once the ball got rolling (not everyone understood it right away), I got some really good ones, as seen in this vid.
The point of it is really to poke fun at Dunning-Kruger effect sufferers, but (perhaps not surprisingly) none of the intended audience seems to have understood it. I don't even think I'm ridiculing anyone here as opposed to pointing out a specific problem.
I get it, your showing creationists what it's like to be faced with someone so opposed to a position they know nothing about. Good job, hopefully the creatards get it
@Gnug215 I'm not surprised by anything they do anymore, not since I started going to fstdt (Fundies Say the Darndest Things for those of you that don't know)
It's a British and French plot to take America back to a age of god fearing superstition, think about it, Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis and the Kentucky Creation Museum is Australian, he has set the seeds for America's descent as vengeance for the US taking world police from the fallout of the Suez Crisis.
@Gnug215 The motivaton is revenge for losing status and toward regaining status. Ken Ham is a agent of MI7 comprised of Australians, Indians, Canadians and Americans still loyal to the royal family, Creationsim is a dead end to science and education, they have people on their side through using religion and misrepresentation of science and history. when America takes it on as a curriculum, they will decay and lose status. While China will benefit greatly, so too will Britain and India.
@jmdnarri So far, all the creationists that have commented on the video have done so because they failed utterly and totally to get the point. Sad, but true. :(
Thanks for the thanks, though. Glad you liked it. :)
I know it's a bit obscure and internal, so it's not so strange that it was confusing.
But hey, at least your first message honestly expressed confusion, instead of most of the other messages from people who don't get it, who immediately turn to insults and derision.
That's seriously a huge frigging stamp of approval on your personality, if you ask me.
Well then, I guess you missed the point about this being a parody, in spite of it being fairly obvious, and being mentioned in the description, AND revealed at the end of the video.
@Gnug215 its funny how you evos make fun of us.but if we use the same dumb style of questions you just used,we are the stupid ones.but you surely can use stupid questions and everything is ok
@turi73 Ok, clearly you're not getting this. Let me break it down for you in the simplest of terms: This video makes fun of all the videos out there where theists/creationists ask a bunch of questions. This video tries to point out, by way of parody, how those questions in those aforementioned videos are nonsensical - by posing a long string of totally silly and nonsencial questions of its own. The questions here are deliberately stupid. UnLIKE most of those theist/creationist vids.
@turi73 Clearly, you've not seen some of the videos in question, then.
They have gold nuggets such as: "If people came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys around?", or "How can the Big Bang, which is an explosion, create the world as we see it today?", or "Since evolution makes things bigger and better, how come pinecones are getting smaller?" Etc.
If you're a theist and don't ask questions like those, consider yourself NOT the parody target of this video.
The problem with your "questions" is that you are brainwashed by fundamentalists and as such you refuse to listen to the people who know how things you idiots hate so much work. Because of that when given the evdence to the contrary you do what is shown in the second picture featured in this video making yourself look even dumber than before. Creationism has been officially outlawed since the 2005 ruling which made it unconstitutional due to seperation of church and state.
Evolution has nothing to do with faiith. It's the gradual change of a species over a long period of time. The only thing that comes close to faith is predicting a possible detail of evolution. It has been predicted that i humans shared a common ancestor with the great apes that there would be some genetic similarities. there has been such a discovery made, showing our DNA is 98% identical to that of the chimpanzee as humans have 46 chromosomes to a chimp's 48.
@NUTCASE71733 just because 98 % of our DNA is similar to chimps doesnt mean we come from them.we share 60 % of the same DNA with fruit flies and it doesnt mean they are the intermediate transition close below us.plus a regio has been observed in the Y chromosome nad it resulted that there is a 30 percent difference
None of that made any sense. All organisms on this planet are made of DNA, so there WILL be some similarities in one or two genes, but not a whole genome. That's why fruit flies are insects and not vertabrates. Humans fall into the following taxonomic orders; Chordata (vertibrate), tetrapoda, mamalia. The only mammals we look anything like are primates.
Furthermore, unlike what your creationist ilk beleive, we did not evolve from MODERN day apes. Given our similarities to the chimps we evolved from an ancestor similar to all great apes as a whole. This ancestor is long-since extinct, and today all we have are orangutangs, gorillas, chimps, and finally humans that make up this particular order.
@turi73 It's a known fact one can't just discard a chromasome as such a thing would be fatal to anything. It had been predicted that for this change to be possible that two chromasomes had to have fused somewhere along the line. When the human genome was sequenced a few years ago, the prediction proved true when Chromasome number 2 has shown that it was in fact a fused chromasome. Look it up.
I realize that you said not to comment before watching the entire thing. But I comment because this video is a stumbling block, and could easily cause people to think that all this is true.
@computersguy13 Yes, and I think you also realized that you had just wasted time and comments "debunking" this fairly obvious parody. The video description also reveals this.
I'd wager that this video is only a stumbling block for people who have yet to stumble over a brain.
But yeah, thanks for cluttering up the comment section.
13. Because he didn't use it all. 14. Exactly 15. They aren't fundamentalists 16. Catholicism isn't what Jesus started. 17. Then were are you getting your information 18. Try reading that secion again 19. Try: "The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God." 20. You're an idiot 21. So? 22. False 23. Try reading that again 24. False 25. Incorrect. That's just when people changed it. 26. Yes, yes it is. 27. He didn't. 28. Dirt, not mud. And he is now. 29. Idiot. 30. Idiot
@Tolstoievsky Well, there were actually 8 people in total that came up with ideas for the questions. A crack team, sure, but not a team on crack. (It wasn't easy to come up with, though.)
@Gnug215, they don't get anything. That's why they're creationists in the first place.
(I have met one exception. He accepts the irrefutability of evolution but believes there's no reason why God couldn't have created some extra people and the Garden of Eden on the side, if he wanted to)
@bunkermonkey6 I'm glad you liked it. And yeah, it's sad... a lot sadder than the fact that many don't get the satire. A sad world, even the pinecones are getting smaller.
@spacecoke still not sure on the target of the parody though, is the target people fanboy athiests who will just agree with anythign another athiest says?
@supermanlypunch ot the person who does not read the second part of my comment when i noticed it was a parody?,a parody with retarded questions a athiest would not ask i must add. i think the maker of this maybe wanted athiests to agree with the vid while not knowing it is a parody. i am sorry but nope i instantly recognised how dumb the questions are so i am not the dumb one.
@spacecoke Ohh sorry I didn't see that part when I commented, so disregard that. But I'd like to point out, that while you doubt anyone is retarded enough to make such comments, Creationists make similar ones on a daily basis. Yes some of them are just straight up nonsense he pulled out of his ass, but with some of them are nearly identical to a few creationist arguments.
@spacecoke The target of the parody is actually creationists, who ask nonsensical questions similar to the ones in the video - I just reversed things, and made up questions that would be silly for atheists (or the like) to ask creationists.
Coming up with really dumb questions wasn't that easy, actually. :)
"If you dont get it, then you clearly havent been involved long enough with the evolution vs. creationism debate" taken from the info.
that makes me retarded? you sir are a totaly ignorant troll, at least the maker of thie vid pointed it out to me nicely that it WAS a parody and i apologised MONTHS AGO! did you go searching through the old comments looking for someone to troll or something? lmao.. you SAD GIT!
@spacecoke you were dumb enough to not read the description. i was curious to see how many dumb people there were that didnt read the description sorry i didnt write down every retard that apologized so i wouldnt get accidental label someone a retard. dumbass
@yourwrong1000 lol, look you little pathetic troll, not reding an info box does not make me a retard, but you thinking it does makes you an ignorant little prick =)
@spacecoke reading* and its in big bold letters right below the video, you would have had to look at the description to go down and comment. btw if im a troll for making fun of you for making a retarded comment, than i deserve it
I've always wondered. If God is so all powerful then why would it need to use a flood to kill everyone? Why not just make everyone disappear? No need for a flood, boat, rounding up 2 of every animal, etc.
@systematic101 You're not the only one who has wondered that. But well... the answer that makes the most sense is that the Flood never happened, so... :)
@Gnug215 It's funny that questions like these I asked the priest and family as a child. They never really answered. At the age of 6 I figured out that they didn't really believe the stories themselves else they would face the questions with out fear. I find it funny that these adults can't see the bullshit in these stories.
1) Where did you get that Idea because it's not in the bible the people who wanted him dead were the jewish leaders not his disciples. Though Jesus actually said this was the reason he lived was to die for our sins. I just think your question is ignoran.
@johnandraquell Hi. My question is not so much ignorant as it is deliberate, conscious nonsense.
I'm afraid you may have missed the entire point of my video - which I actually explain in the end of the video, so I'm assuming you didn't watch all of it?
@johnandraquell Well, I was trying my best sarcastic-voice in this vid, but many missed that. I guess I'm not so good at being sarcastic as I thought. :(
Creationism doesn't necessarily have anything to do with religion. It's just the opposing "theory" to evolution.
Also, I'm a bit confused. The video seems to be mocking those that don't believe in a Christian god, but the comments below seem to mock those that do.
@Bonsaiboy027 Creationism is, for all intents and purposes, intrinsically connected to religion. I don't think I've ever seen this not being the case. Creationism is more than just opposing the theory of evolution. Usually, it opposes cosmology, too, as well as abiogenesis. Generally, it opposes the view that the world we see is the result of natural processes.
Beyond this, I'm sure you know that Young Earth Creationism opposes much more than that (geology, physics, astronomy, etc.)
@Bonsaiboy027 The video is, of course, a parody mock job thing. It isn't out to mock those that believe, but specifically those that use arguments related (although from the other side of the fence) to the kinds in the video.
Usually the perpetrators of such nonsense are Biblical literalists, fundies, and very often YECs, who manage to butcher the theory of evolution beyond belief.
I'm going for the ball, not the man, but I suppose I don't quite manage to avoid the man entirely.
@Bonsaiboy027 The video is, of course, a parody mock job thing. It isn't out to mock those that believe, but specifically those that use arguments related (although from the other side of the fence) to the kinds in the video.
Usually the perpetrators of such nonsense are Biblical literalists, fundies, and very often YECs, who manage to butcher the theory of evolution beyond belief.
I'm going for the ball, not the man, but I suppose I don't quite manage to avoid the man entirely.
Well, since so many creationists that I've come across don't seem to grasp what a strawman-argument is, I thought I'd demonstrate it to them in a way they would be sure to understand.
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Comment removed
itssohardtomakeaname 1 week ago
Why doesn't God make itself not exist? Why won't God make a being more powerful than itself so it can see what it's like to be pushed around, lorded over & abused? Were God's parents abusive? Why didn't God make penises hide inside the body when not in use? Why can't God breathe underwater? Where did God learn how to make a universe? When God wakes, will we all disappear? How can God know it wasn't created by a higher power? How can that higher power know it wasn't created by a higher power?
Strangerinasland 2 months ago
@Strangerinasland Poseidon can breathe underwater.
GoblinXXX 2 weeks ago
this parody makes no sense !!!
chillstation100proof 2 months ago
first of all every question he ask about the bible is not even in the bible maybe thats why he cant find the answer to his question !!!!
chillstation100proof 2 months ago
Number 10 is an epic win! "Father! Why have you abandoned me?!" If I remember correctly, that's what he said.
coolbionicle 3 months ago
@coolbionicle Yes, if you think about it, it's actually kinda close to renouncing. Maybe I should have said that he converted on his deathbed. :)
Gnug215 3 months ago
I think Number 16 is actually true. The video is not remotely funny btw.
ytfmichaelxu 4 months ago
@ytfmichaelxu Ah well.
Gnug215 4 months ago
I watched the video before reading the description. I Facepalmed throughout the ENTIRE video
austin123457 8 months ago
@austin123457 Lol, well mission accomplished, I guess.
I'm sorry for your pain, though. ;)
Gnug215 8 months ago
Or - to quote Jimmy Carr - "if we all are God's children - what's so special about Jesus?" :)
KristoffDoe 9 months ago 2
With number 8, are you saying that the christ part isn't in the bible or are you saying there is no mention of jesus at all. Make sure you're also reading the new testament. We are all sinners, it never tells us to go killing and raping, where the hell does it say that. It may be a parody or whatever but it makes no sense. These are all terrible statements. I mean almost anyone could have come up with better arguments.First of all we have no relation to mud. relatives have to have life.
markchamplive1 9 months ago
@markchamplive1 It's strange that you are able to identify this video as a parody, but then fail to perceive the point of the parody.
I guess I have to ask: Do you know what the video is a parody of?
Gnug215 9 months ago
@Gnug215 My guess is it's a parody on some of the arguments against Creationism but you seem to have chosen the very weakest ones and fabricated your own.
markchamplive1 9 months ago
@markchamplive1 It's actually a parody of arguments USED by Creationists (against evolution/atheism/whatever).
The ones in this video are, of course, entirely fabricated to look just as ridiculous and misinformed as some of those arguments that you often see, called something like "10 questions for atheists/evolutionists".
Mind you, it was hard work coming up with such stupid questions for this video. I even had to collect suggestions from a forum.
Gnug215 9 months ago
one quick question to all atheists, evolutionists and general anti-creationists. Your scientific theory suggests that matter and anti matter collided to cause the big bang. The entire universe was filled with antimatter and matter prior to this. The universe is now full of matter, where has the anti-matter disappeared to? When creationists say they believe in God you guys say "prove it, show me God". Ok, so prove it to me now, "show me anti-matter!"
KiprosPAO 9 months ago
@KiprosPAO You're wrong. Atheists only believe there is no god.
Please, research something before you bitch about it.
UristMcgee 9 months ago
@UristMcgee atheists tend to use the bang bang theory as evidence to argue against the existence of God but this very evidence is flawed
KiprosPAO 9 months ago
@KiprosPAO I'd argue that atheist arguing against God by using the Big Bang theory are doing it wrong. The Big Bang theory is just a theory that explains what cosmology and astronomy are observing. These observations conflict with "creation" being 6 or 10 thousand years old. That is what the argument is about. You can still be a creationist (just not a YEC) and accept that the universe is 13.7billion years old. Then no problem.
Gnug215 9 months ago
@Gnug215 Christianity doesn't necessarily argue against the universe being billions of years old. I had a very interesting convo with a guy on youtube that explained this in detail. There are two places in The Bible where it says one day for God is as a thousand years for us. That isn't meant to be taken literally but shows that God's time isn't measured as ours is. For instance, if "God's kingdom" is another planet then time on that planet would be different, depending on it's rotation/orbit
KiprosPAO 9 months ago
@KiprosPAO Yes, which is why I'm specifically targetting Creationism in this video (although granted, common ground is touched on in my vid since I'm using the Bible as the main driver in my parody).
What I'm specifically parodying is those "10 questions to evilutionists" type videos you see around the place. In those videos, the "source" (which in this parody is the Bible) is being so violated and contorted, that it's almost funny.
This is my "homage" to such videos.
Gnug215 9 months ago
@KiprosPAO Hi, first, sorry for the late reply. Some notification mails got lost in the shuffle.
Now, I wouldn't describe myself as an atheist or evolutionist, but I can assure you that neither of those two have the Big Bang theory as a prerequisite for their viewpoints.
As for the Big Bang, it's the current prevailing cosmological theory on why the universe looks like it does today. Scientists can trace the evidence all the way back to the "Bang", but not beyond, so there is still mystery.
Gnug215 9 months ago
@KiprosPAO (continued) I'd also argue that anyone asking for "proof of God" is doing something wrong. What you want to ask for is evidence. And well, there is a lot of evidence that supports the Big Bang theory. I suggest you look it up. You could always start on Wikipedia.
As for anti-matter itself, it is easily produced, and has even been detected naturally.
As for the universe, if the amount and force in matter and anti-matter were equal at the "Bang", we wouldn't be here.
Gnug215 9 months ago
@KiprosPAO this is in response to a post of yours made 9 months ago... No our current theory isn't that the big bang was created by a collision of matter and antimatter, just to clear up, the big bang was NOT i repeat NOT an explosion but a rapid expansion of space and time. There is also still antimatter around just not the same amount as there is matter. And for the final kick-in-the-teeth scientists have made anti-hydrogen. Look this stuff up if you're going to use it.
golem1180 1 week ago
Hi May I suggest you read the Bible in context and also you are seriously miss quoting...
May suggest you talk about what you know about, this way you just come out silly!
Gocajoca 10 months ago
@Gocajoca Hi, sorry for the late response, but the notification mails got lost in the shuffle.
Anyway, this is a parody video. The questions were made to be deliberately false - and entirely silly.
Gnug215 9 months ago
hey your using facts in your examples how can we argue with you now whaawaa whaaaaa lolol
johndebbra 10 months ago
Sorry, I know this is parody, but I dont get who you are defending. You are making pointless points that neither side has EVER made. If you are defending atheism, which it doesnt seem that you are since you play an atheist, it makes no sense. If you defend theism, you are stating questions no atheist have ever asked.
gulbirk 10 months ago
@gulbirk It's a little contorted, I know, but here's what I'm doing: I'm criticizing creationists/theists, by parodying some of the questions they sometimes ask us.
Questions, such as: "If evolution is true, how come there are still monkeys?"
Or, "Explosions destroy things, so how could the Big Bang create what we see today?"
Those kind of questions are nonsensical and non-sequiteurs, so I decided to return in kind, see what they think of that. (So far, none of them get it.)
Gnug215 10 months ago
@Gnug215 Oh, oh then I get it, LOL.
gulbirk 10 months ago
@gulbirk Hehe, I'm glad you do. Like I said, it's a bit contrived, but I was getting reaaaally tired of all those nonsencial questions you see all over the place, like "10 questions evolutionists must answer!" and stuff like that.
Gnug215 10 months ago
@Gnug215 My favourite one is the video called """10 questions evolutionists cant answer""" (or something like that). And then, the first question is ""Why are the planets round?""". LOL
gulbirk 10 months ago
@gulbirk Lol, a classic. I suppose then that you have seen desertphile's classic "Gravity!!!" video? :)
Gnug215 10 months ago
@Gnug215 No, I havent. Can you link it? :)
gulbirk 10 months ago
@gulbirk Link is on the way in a pm. :)
Gnug215 10 months ago
Brilliant... just brilliant
2nDoppelganger 10 months ago
@2nDoppelganger Thank you very much. :)
Gnug215 10 months ago
Whats really funny is that religious folks are serious when they do that very same thing about science or anyone that does not believe in what they believe in.
seeker6789 11 months ago
@seeker6789 That is indeed what this parody is making fun of. Sadly, and perhaps expectedly, the religious people that it's directed at that have responded so far haven't gotten the joke.
I don't think it's a coincidence. :)
Gnug215 11 months ago
its a parody but its still ignorance
domtriga 11 months ago
@domtriga Hmm, what about it is ignorance?
Gnug215 11 months ago
@domtriga none of its true and you say its a parody but you still seems like your serious. idk really how to explain it. its just offensive
domtriga 11 months ago
Nice. I'd never heard of D-K effect, but so true. ...and to be fair, I suspect we would agree that that type of personality can be found in a variety of settings. This is interesting, but it occurs to me; I think if you read the gospels you would see that you and Jesus have a significant common trait: you are not at all worried about offending religious people. :)
dostol3701 11 months ago
@dostol3701 Oh, this can be found in a LOT of places. For instance, I think many on the non-believer side felt that Thunderf00t made himself guilty of this when he delved into "theology" in some of his vids.
Heh, I guess in that respect I also have something in common with Jesus, in that we're essentially asking for humility. But yeah, religion needs to be treated more irreverantly, but not specifically religious people: just those that, well, deserve it.
Gnug215 11 months ago
Very good. I think you must know something about the bible to make such nonesensical questions. Really funny, and good point. I'd like to be able to talk about evolution as a theory of origins, for example, but I'm not so well informed. I mostly have questions. I guess as a creationist I should end with the obligatory, "Repent ye heathen, lest I call down fire from on high to consume theeee!" So I thinks that covers it.
dostol3701 1 year ago
@dostol3701 It was actually really hard to come up with. I even made a thread on a forum asking for suggestions, and once the ball got rolling (not everyone understood it right away), I got some really good ones, as seen in this vid.
The point of it is really to poke fun at Dunning-Kruger effect sufferers, but (perhaps not surprisingly) none of the intended audience seems to have understood it. I don't even think I'm ridiculing anyone here as opposed to pointing out a specific problem.
Gnug215 11 months ago
Best video on youtube
2nDoppelganger 1 year ago
@2nDoppelganger Lol, thanks. Not great production value, for sure, though. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
I get it, your showing creationists what it's like to be faced with someone so opposed to a position they know nothing about. Good job, hopefully the creatards get it
Thatonedude917 1 year ago
@Thatonedude917 So far, none of them have gotten it. I guess we shouldn't be surprised?
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 I'm not surprised by anything they do anymore, not since I started going to fstdt (Fundies Say the Darndest Things for those of you that don't know)
Thatonedude917 1 year ago
@Thatonedude917 Hehe, quite. Incidentally, FSTDT was the reason I ended up here. I think it was a quote by VFX, in fact. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
haha :P pretty epic
Duelistic678Thinker 1 year ago
Hahahahahaha :) This is genious! This is the funniest video I've seen in a long time!
Thank you :)
Dahl1980 1 year ago
@Dahl1980 Thanks, I'm really glad you liked it! :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
Very nicely done! Expresses the creationist 'logic' perfectly.
jimbocidman 1 year ago
@jimbocidman Glad you liked it. It took a collaborative effort to come up with so much nonsense. Creationist 'logic' is hard. ;)
Gnug215 1 year ago
It's a British and French plot to take America back to a age of god fearing superstition, think about it, Ken Ham of Answers in Genesis and the Kentucky Creation Museum is Australian, he has set the seeds for America's descent as vengeance for the US taking world police from the fallout of the Suez Crisis.
ganados0 1 year ago
@ganados0 Sounds improbable, strange, unmotivated, far out, unlikely... I'm totally unboard!! :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 The motivaton is revenge for losing status and toward regaining status. Ken Ham is a agent of MI7 comprised of Australians, Indians, Canadians and Americans still loyal to the royal family, Creationsim is a dead end to science and education, they have people on their side through using religion and misrepresentation of science and history. when America takes it on as a curriculum, they will decay and lose status. While China will benefit greatly, so too will Britain and India.
ganados0 1 year ago
@ganados0 That sounds just about contorted and strange enough to totally be true!
Gnug215 1 year ago
LMAO LMAO, I hope hope hope at least one creationist got the parallel and understands why their objections are laughed at!!
Thank you for this fabulous video!!!
jmdnarri 1 year ago
@jmdnarri So far, all the creationists that have commented on the video have done so because they failed utterly and totally to get the point. Sad, but true. :(
Thanks for the thanks, though. Glad you liked it. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
Judas knew that jesus needed someone to betray him, so he could be crucified, otherwise they wouldn't have much of a religion.
panterguy 1 year ago
Numbers 3, 13, 25, 26, 28, and 32 made me laugh until I cried. Nice! :)
Snackar 1 year ago
@Snackar Hehe, I'm glad to hear that. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
WAIT!!!!
i just got the joke. XD
alixinthemiddle 1 year ago
@alixinthemiddle Hehe, yay!
I know it's a bit obscure and internal, so it's not so strange that it was confusing.
But hey, at least your first message honestly expressed confusion, instead of most of the other messages from people who don't get it, who immediately turn to insults and derision.
That's seriously a huge frigging stamp of approval on your personality, if you ask me.
Apart from that, I hope you enjoyed the joke. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
this confuses me slightly.
and by slighty, i mean a lot.
i think the reason no one can answer these questions is because... well... they don't make any sense. XD
alixinthemiddle 1 year ago
I'm not sure if this is pro evolution or pro creationism.
Houshalter 1 year ago
@Houshalter More like anti creationism. ;)
Gnug215 1 year ago 2
hahahahah this is freaking dumb.i was getting ready to hear some good questions.but why even bother with this stupidity
turi73 1 year ago
@turi73 Hmm, "stupidity" you say.
Well then, I guess you missed the point about this being a parody, in spite of it being fairly obvious, and being mentioned in the description, AND revealed at the end of the video.
I wonder what one would call that. ;)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 its funny how you evos make fun of us.but if we use the same dumb style of questions you just used,we are the stupid ones.but you surely can use stupid questions and everything is ok
turi73 1 year ago
@turi73 Ok, clearly you're not getting this. Let me break it down for you in the simplest of terms: This video makes fun of all the videos out there where theists/creationists ask a bunch of questions. This video tries to point out, by way of parody, how those questions in those aforementioned videos are nonsensical - by posing a long string of totally silly and nonsencial questions of its own. The questions here are deliberately stupid. UnLIKE most of those theist/creationist vids.
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 whats so dumb about questions regarding empirical evidence,which is what science really is(observation)
turi73 1 year ago
@turi73 Clearly, you've not seen some of the videos in question, then.
They have gold nuggets such as: "If people came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys around?", or "How can the Big Bang, which is an explosion, create the world as we see it today?", or "Since evolution makes things bigger and better, how come pinecones are getting smaller?" Etc.
If you're a theist and don't ask questions like those, consider yourself NOT the parody target of this video.
Gnug215 1 year ago
@turi73
The problem with your "questions" is that you are brainwashed by fundamentalists and as such you refuse to listen to the people who know how things you idiots hate so much work. Because of that when given the evdence to the contrary you do what is shown in the second picture featured in this video making yourself look even dumber than before. Creationism has been officially outlawed since the 2005 ruling which made it unconstitutional due to seperation of church and state.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
@NUTCASE71733 no bro,in fact i think you naturalists are.its sux how u get to teach your "faith" in skools as if were fact
turi73 1 year ago
@turi73
Evolution has nothing to do with faiith. It's the gradual change of a species over a long period of time. The only thing that comes close to faith is predicting a possible detail of evolution. It has been predicted that i humans shared a common ancestor with the great apes that there would be some genetic similarities. there has been such a discovery made, showing our DNA is 98% identical to that of the chimpanzee as humans have 46 chromosomes to a chimp's 48.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
@NUTCASE71733 just because 98 % of our DNA is similar to chimps doesnt mean we come from them.we share 60 % of the same DNA with fruit flies and it doesnt mean they are the intermediate transition close below us.plus a regio has been observed in the Y chromosome nad it resulted that there is a 30 percent difference
turi73 1 year ago
None of that made any sense. All organisms on this planet are made of DNA, so there WILL be some similarities in one or two genes, but not a whole genome. That's why fruit flies are insects and not vertabrates. Humans fall into the following taxonomic orders; Chordata (vertibrate), tetrapoda, mamalia. The only mammals we look anything like are primates.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
@turi73
Furthermore, unlike what your creationist ilk beleive, we did not evolve from MODERN day apes. Given our similarities to the chimps we evolved from an ancestor similar to all great apes as a whole. This ancestor is long-since extinct, and today all we have are orangutangs, gorillas, chimps, and finally humans that make up this particular order.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
@turi73 It's a known fact one can't just discard a chromasome as such a thing would be fatal to anything. It had been predicted that for this change to be possible that two chromasomes had to have fused somewhere along the line. When the human genome was sequenced a few years ago, the prediction proved true when Chromasome number 2 has shown that it was in fact a fused chromasome. Look it up.
NUTCASE71733 1 year ago
I realize that you said not to comment before watching the entire thing. But I comment because this video is a stumbling block, and could easily cause people to think that all this is true.
Rom 14:13b (KJV)
computersguy13 1 year ago
@computersguy13 Yes, and I think you also realized that you had just wasted time and comments "debunking" this fairly obvious parody. The video description also reveals this.
I'd wager that this video is only a stumbling block for people who have yet to stumble over a brain.
But yeah, thanks for cluttering up the comment section.
Gnug215 1 year ago
computersguy13 1 year ago
5. Revelation is a prophecy, not history. Use a dictionary if you don't know the difference.
6. They were brother's in Christ. And Mary and Joseph were only virgins for Jesus birth, Jesus also had half brothers (From Mary and Joseph)
7. Because it's from man's perspective.
8. A lie!
9. A lie!
10. Because he was bearing the elect's sins. He paid the price for that, death, and rose again, restoring fellowship.
11. The water had to go somewhere. Duh!
12. You need a reality check
computersguy13 1 year ago
1. They didn't. It was the rest of the Jew's that wanted Him crucified.
2. It doesn't! Rev 20:15 - And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
3. It's not made of wine. It was a symbolism. And they weren't drinking what we know as wine today, but rather it was grape juice.
4. Nowhere does it say a snake ate an apple. If you coming from the Garden of Eden, it doesn't say what the fruit was.
computersguy13 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow man have you even read the Bible?
enolam5000 1 year ago
this made my day! Great stuff in the forgotten threads
Lallapalalable 1 year ago
@Lallapalalable Yay! I made a day! :)
Glad you liked it, hehe.
Gnug215 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hadesofthe07 1 year ago
@Hadesofthe07 Well, if you hadd read the description or seen the end of the video, you would have seen that it's a parody, so... ;)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Hadesofthe07 Well, if you hadd read the description or seen the end of the video, you would have seen that it's a parody, so... ;)
Gnug215 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hadesofthe07 1 year ago
@Hadesofthe07 I am subbed to Current, actually. But let me guess, you thought he was serious when you first saw him? ;)
And perhaps you just don't get the target of the parody in this vid?
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 perhaps
Hadesofthe07 1 year ago
BRILLIANT! It took me a second to get it but once I did I loved it.
customerjon 1 year ago
@customerjon Hehe, thanks. Some don't get it at all, so consider yourself lucky. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 11 is my favorite.
customerjon 1 year ago
Comment removed
HatemailMagnet 1 year ago
lol straw man FTW
viking977 1 year ago
crack is a helluva drug
Tolstoievsky 1 year ago
@Tolstoievsky I'm sure it is. Your point being?
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 dude...have you seen this video? you can't just make stuff like this up
Tolstoievsky 1 year ago
@Tolstoievsky Well, there were actually 8 people in total that came up with ideas for the questions. A crack team, sure, but not a team on crack. (It wasn't easy to come up with, though.)
Gnug215 1 year ago
Comment removed
kafkadoodle 1 year ago
Very Good and Spot on.
VideoAudioDisco09 1 year ago
@VideoAudioDisco09 Thanks. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
Brilliant man. 5 stars. Hit them with their own stupid questions
jrev37 1 year ago
@jrev37 Thanks. I tried, but they don't seem to get it. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215, they don't get anything. That's why they're creationists in the first place.
(I have met one exception. He accepts the irrefutability of evolution but believes there's no reason why God couldn't have created some extra people and the Garden of Eden on the side, if he wanted to)
EyeLean5280 1 year ago
#18 made me lol. Great video!
TheHomelessCripple 1 year ago
@TheHomelessCripple Hehe, yeah, one of my favs, too. Just totally contrived and senseless. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
This is friggin funny. The sad part is people actully will ask these questions then not understand why they are getting laughed at.
bunkermonkey6 1 year ago
@bunkermonkey6 I'm glad you liked it. And yeah, it's sad... a lot sadder than the fact that many don't get the satire. A sad world, even the pinecones are getting smaller.
Gnug215 1 year ago
most these questions are seriously retarded.lol, so there realy are dumb athiests out there.
spacecoke 1 year ago
@spacecoke oh its a parody, that would explain why its so retarded then lol
spacecoke 1 year ago
@spacecoke Hehe, I'm glad you found out. :) I hope you also get the purpose of the parody. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@spacecoke still not sure on the target of the parody though, is the target people fanboy athiests who will just agree with anythign another athiest says?
spacecoke 1 year ago
@spacecoke Who is dumber, the man who makes retarded comments for reasons of parody or the person who takes the parody seriously?
supermanlypunch 1 year ago
@supermanlypunch ot the person who does not read the second part of my comment when i noticed it was a parody?,a parody with retarded questions a athiest would not ask i must add. i think the maker of this maybe wanted athiests to agree with the vid while not knowing it is a parody. i am sorry but nope i instantly recognised how dumb the questions are so i am not the dumb one.
spacecoke 1 year ago
@spacecoke Ohh sorry I didn't see that part when I commented, so disregard that. But I'd like to point out, that while you doubt anyone is retarded enough to make such comments, Creationists make similar ones on a daily basis. Yes some of them are just straight up nonsense he pulled out of his ass, but with some of them are nearly identical to a few creationist arguments.
supermanlypunch 1 year ago
@spacecoke The target of the parody is actually creationists, who ask nonsensical questions similar to the ones in the video - I just reversed things, and made up questions that would be silly for atheists (or the like) to ask creationists.
Coming up with really dumb questions wasn't that easy, actually. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@spacecoke lol biggest. retard. ever. (You i mean)
yourwrong1000 1 year ago
sure i am, and you are a the genius lord of logic
spacecoke 1 year ago
"If you dont get it, then you clearly havent been involved long enough with the evolution vs. creationism debate" taken from the info.
that makes me retarded? you sir are a totaly ignorant troll, at least the maker of thie vid pointed it out to me nicely that it WAS a parody and i apologised MONTHS AGO! did you go searching through the old comments looking for someone to troll or something? lmao.. you SAD GIT!
spacecoke 1 year ago
@spacecoke you were dumb enough to not read the description. i was curious to see how many dumb people there were that didnt read the description sorry i didnt write down every retard that apologized so i wouldnt get accidental label someone a retard. dumbass
yourwrong1000 1 year ago
@yourwrong1000 lol, look you little pathetic troll, not reding an info box does not make me a retard, but you thinking it does makes you an ignorant little prick =)
spacecoke 1 year ago
@spacecoke reading* and its in big bold letters right below the video, you would have had to look at the description to go down and comment. btw if im a troll for making fun of you for making a retarded comment, than i deserve it
yourwrong1000 1 year ago
I've always wondered. If God is so all powerful then why would it need to use a flood to kill everyone? Why not just make everyone disappear? No need for a flood, boat, rounding up 2 of every animal, etc.
systematic101 1 year ago
@systematic101 like all fairy tales, they fall apart the second anyone asks intelligent questions.
TheHigherVoltage 1 year ago
@systematic101 You're not the only one who has wondered that. But well... the answer that makes the most sense is that the Flood never happened, so... :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 It's funny that questions like these I asked the priest and family as a child. They never really answered. At the age of 6 I figured out that they didn't really believe the stories themselves else they would face the questions with out fear. I find it funny that these adults can't see the bullshit in these stories.
systematic101 1 year ago
@systematic101 I was really too dumb to wonder as a kid, or ask questions. I think I even had to be taught to think for myself. ;)
It didn't help much when I grew up, but I seem to be harder to convince of bullshit.
Gnug215 1 year ago
@systematic101
Stop It. Stop it right now. Your trying to use common sense and Logic.
You know that is ver-boten in creationism and religion.
If you persist it will ruin the whole thing.
VideoAudioDisco09 1 year ago
This is video is foolish and a complete waste of time
excusia 1 year ago
@excusia And why is that?
Gnug215 1 year ago
@LtModigliani Sounds good! I'm glad to be of service, at least. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@LtModigliani Yay, glad you liked some of them! :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
1) Where did you get that Idea because it's not in the bible the people who wanted him dead were the jewish leaders not his disciples. Though Jesus actually said this was the reason he lived was to die for our sins. I just think your question is ignoran.
johnandraquell 1 year ago
@johnandraquell Hi. My question is not so much ignorant as it is deliberate, conscious nonsense.
I'm afraid you may have missed the entire point of my video - which I actually explain in the end of the video, so I'm assuming you didn't watch all of it?
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 Tushay
johnandraquell 1 year ago
@johnandraquell Well, I was trying my best sarcastic-voice in this vid, but many missed that. I guess I'm not so good at being sarcastic as I thought. :(
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 No you got it down, I didn't watch the whole thing the first time so yeah I kinda missed the point.
johnandraquell 1 year ago
@johnandraquell Ok, good to know. But well, I suppose one point of the video is also to fool people a bit, so...
But thanks for re-watching so we could clear this up. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
If God created earth then WHY
do we call day for day and not night (3 first DAYS there were no sun).
Did he make it impossible to draw an exact circle (PI has bill. of decimals).
Did he use 3 different creation methods (magic . Rib . third party ).
Are different periodic table elements fused together as stone/mountains.
Does the air we breathe consist of different compounds.
Were America discovered 5300 years later.
jipersson 1 year ago
@jipersson Hejsa! ;)
Well, these are all good questions, but they're also not nonsensical, like the ones in the video.
It's hard coming up with silly nonsense! :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215 jamen hejsa!!
Thank god he didn't "third party" inseminate Maria in Denmark
between 1863-1973 . Otherwise Joseph might not have become a carpenter
but a "sporvognsskinneskidtskrabersangforeningsformand"
Intranslateable.
jipersson 1 year ago
Dude, Skeletor vs the Smurfs was made into a movie. But it got botched because it was done by that guy who did Titanic.
goneutt 1 year ago
Creationism doesn't necessarily have anything to do with religion. It's just the opposing "theory" to evolution.
Also, I'm a bit confused. The video seems to be mocking those that don't believe in a Christian god, but the comments below seem to mock those that do.
Bonsaiboy027 1 year ago
@Bonsaiboy027 Creationism is, for all intents and purposes, intrinsically connected to religion. I don't think I've ever seen this not being the case. Creationism is more than just opposing the theory of evolution. Usually, it opposes cosmology, too, as well as abiogenesis. Generally, it opposes the view that the world we see is the result of natural processes.
Beyond this, I'm sure you know that Young Earth Creationism opposes much more than that (geology, physics, astronomy, etc.)
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Bonsaiboy027 The video is, of course, a parody mock job thing. It isn't out to mock those that believe, but specifically those that use arguments related (although from the other side of the fence) to the kinds in the video.
Usually the perpetrators of such nonsense are Biblical literalists, fundies, and very often YECs, who manage to butcher the theory of evolution beyond belief.
I'm going for the ball, not the man, but I suppose I don't quite manage to avoid the man entirely.
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Bonsaiboy027 The video is, of course, a parody mock job thing. It isn't out to mock those that believe, but specifically those that use arguments related (although from the other side of the fence) to the kinds in the video.
Usually the perpetrators of such nonsense are Biblical literalists, fundies, and very often YECs, who manage to butcher the theory of evolution beyond belief.
I'm going for the ball, not the man, but I suppose I don't quite manage to avoid the man entirely.
Gnug215 1 year ago
Comment removed
Bonsaiboy027 1 year ago
Nr. 28 and 31 is my favorite.
Way your great great grandfather mud?
How come we never see a carpenter turn in to God?
Korkzor 1 year ago
Playing down to their level of argument. This just might work...
Graaaady 1 year ago
Well, since so many creationists that I've come across don't seem to grasp what a strawman-argument is, I thought I'd demonstrate it to them in a way they would be sure to understand.
Gnug215 1 year ago
Wow, creationist-logic thrown right back at them. Pretty creative!
kossxf 1 year ago
Thanks. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
But you forgot to ask if Jesus was the savior of 'man,' then why was he born as a dinosaur, a creature that commonly ate men in the time of Jesus??
bryguy95 1 year ago
Hehe, that's not bad at all. I'm thinking I "forgot" a lot of things, so one could easily make another vid like this. :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
ha ha, maybe this will make the creationst to stop asking thier same stupid questions over and over again.
I wish Kent Hovind watch this.
daarco2 1 year ago
@daarco2
Oh, that is my wish, but I doubt it. All the creationists I've had watch this video so far have completely missed the point of it.
Sarcasm and irony must really be an advanced concept.
Gnug215 1 year ago
@Gnug215
Still, i will show this video to every creationist i end up in "debate" with : )
Someday, somewere......there must be a creationist with trases of human reasoning and emotions.
daarco2 1 year ago
@daarco2
Hehe, you do that. If you ever get the chance, tell me how it goes! :)
Gnug215 1 year ago
i love #3
crankycactus 1 year ago
Parody or not, I still get a minor headache from reading these questions xD
Well done though :)
FortuneInLies 1 year ago