Added: 2 years ago
From: jaziz69
Views: 34,603
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (72)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • sikeyim ya çok iyi

  • what is real? this is the question of our life...

  • the animatrix explains it

    humans struck first.

    the machines made their own nation named 0.1 and soon, with it's better technology it soon came to dominate the market and reduced human economies to nothing.

    so, desperate to save their wealth and pervieved strength, humans struck out at 0.1, forcing the machines who would have happily continued making better machines to serve humans for free, to spread out and fight human nations.

    the war waged on, humanity lost thanks to it's own greed.

  • Im so confused!

  • Am I awesome or is this high?!

  • Residual self image, known by neuroscientists as the default mode network.

  • 322 @1:13...

    Who-WHO will watch The Watchers?

    TheOwlMan ($)

  • How about the whole machine unimatrix, a collection of robotron, skydene, the borg and all those robots from science fiction like r2d2, holograms, outer limits and the twilight zone... vs. the humans... Do we got John connor? T-1000: check and we got sera connor

    do we got that dork from tranformers? robotron/decepticons: (stomp!)

    do we got mr. picard yet? Borg collective: lucutis of borg has been assimilated

    then other robots drag in inspector gadget and batman..you see where this is going

  • @jaymorpheus11 If you like robots and science fiction robot machine races ,then you must check out the necrons.

    Warhammer 40000 wiki necrons. Check it out they are my favorite

  • Is that city supposed to be New York city? I think the city looks to be too 20th century, with several decades added on the cityscape would differ a lot surely.

    In the Second Renaissance New York is destroyed when a machine ambassador turns himself into a suicide bomber, however one packed with a nuke. A very fitting end. However would it maintain its city structure when the centre is ground zero for a massive atomic explosion?

  • this scene brought up the one thing that i had always pondered.......how did the develop a way for us to be "grown" instead of being born? later someone pointed out in another video which was a really good point: if humans blocked out the sun, wouldn't this stop photosynthesis and in turn stopped the production of oxygen so how did the humans living outside the matrix survive for all this time?

  • @thereallucifer666 I think its pure bad science, bit like using humans to generate energy.

  • 1:13 - 2 years after Obama got re-elected

  • Has anyone pointed out how humans are picked from what looks very much like a cotton plant? Very ironic. Its a total inversion. In the past, humans enslaved each so that we could perform the tasks that machines later replaced. In the end, humans were not even slaves anymore though; by the end we had become the plant itself.

  • Comment removed

  • "Unfortunately, no one can be told what the Matrix is. You have to see it for yourself." - So long ago. I remember watching the trailer for the first time

  • Why did they have to screw up this series?? This was amazing!

  • how did humans scorch the sun?

  • @NottinghamForest22

    Look up Animatrix: Second Renaisance

  • @noob1138 thanks

  • I've got do see this movie... What's it rated?

  • best line in the whole movie is from this scene. "Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony."

  • we are all actually just sleeping in tubs of pink goo right now...god could you imagine if it was really 2199 and machines roamed the earth growing us in fields and eating us!?

  • Who cares about all the real/fake mumble jumbo and fancy thinking garbage. The only line in this scene that matters is Morpheus saying "combined with a form of fusion" the machines have solved fusion technology, the greatest energy achievement ever, and they waste on making human batteries?! So stupid.

  • @stantonmjs Perhaps they use human energy to create and sustain the fusion.

  • @stantonmjs Its epistemology!

    How do we know that what we talk about is just mere fabrication that is a form of deception about reality

    The desert of the real: i.e. reality is in worse shape than what is communicated to us.

  • best sci fi film ever so profound!

    sucks though 2nd and 3rd film

  • shit reality is real and human knowledge is real

    people who deny this are in a fantasy world geez.

    nothing but anti-realism

  • 1:20 Shit gets real!

  • Stoppt mal bei 1:24

    NA! Fällt euch was auf!? ;D

  • epic scene

  • "but we know that it was us that scorched the sky"

    HAARP? watch?v=Vp0CYZ2s_cQ

    I've read a lot about haarp. I've read that it's also connected to mind control but mainstream science ridicules the idea that Tesla's technology had such capabilities. I highly recommend people research about "nikola tesla" The ridicule/suppression of his ideas and it's alleged capabilities kind of tie into the Matrix theme.

  • humanity is a giant illusion and human beings are bullshitters. try astral projection if you want to find the "truth"

  • welcome to the desert haha

  • when you start studying weird stuff like quantum mechanics, string theory, the holographic principle and consciousness, you cannot look at the world the same way anymore. you can't help but notice this universe in which we live is so bizarre on the quantum level. when you study this stuff you have taken the red pill and you cannot turn back. you have entered wonderland and you want to know how far down the rabbit hole actually goes. well i have one thing to say, welcome to the matrix.

  • the sky :'( ......

  • There are fields Neo, endless fields, where human beings are no longer born; W are grown.

  • 3 > For example, what if you take your belt off, but another person you're with didn't imagine you with one?

    The only way the line in the film works is if we fill in the blanks.. As in, it could be a mental projection which the system then collects and redistributes digitally as your appearance to everyone else. This doesn't seem, from a purely linguistic standpoint, to be the most obvious interpretation, so if that was their intention they could have been much more explicit with it.

  • 1 > I can see how it can work both ways, but with different implications. 'mental projection .. digital self' implies that the mind itself visually interprets from the digital data. The system itself doesn't 'render' what everyone can see, but provides the brain with enough information to do it itself. Conceptually strong, but it ignores the intended implication that Neo's appearance comes from his mental 'self-image'.

  • "Fate its seems, is not without a sense of irony."

  • Baudrillard did not approve of the film's inacurate usage of his term 'the desert of the real'.

  • @jaziz69 I read that article her wrote too. Can't quite remember it. But desert of the real is suppose to mean that most of our systems of knowledge have absolutely nothing to do with an objective reality. Human knowledge is not real knowledge, it is mostly imaginary. Ancient cultures understood his concept that life is an illusion. However, in this movie, they actually say that everything is a real illusion, and there is anther physical world we have not seen. Quite confusing.

  • @Enigma6662 It's from Baudrillard's Simulacra and Simulation. Human knowledge is not imaginary as such; quite the contrary. "Meaning" essentially constitutes our reality - it IS our "reality"/"knowledge", as there is no such thing as Reality or Knowledge. Our "reality" is an empty husk - a pastiche; a "desert". It resembles nothing but itself - it is it's own pure simulacra. The film actually pertains more to Plato's Cave - the existence of an "exterior" world we cannot see. Both interesting.

  • @jaziz69 Yeah I know, it is more Plato's Cave Allegory, than straight up postmodern, because it is as if we can still get to a reality, in the movie.

  • @natedaug1 Which postmodern theory are you refering to...

  • @TheMonstersAreDue Baudrillard, even though they mention it, it is not really that because they can get to a higher reality, in the movie.

  • @jaziz69 it's the confusion between simulacrum and the Platonic appearance/reality thing in the movie that Baudrillard objected to. they are very different ideas, and while the movie references Baudrillard a few times, its actual philosophical subject matter is the Platonic thing

  • @jaziz69 The Matrix and Simulacra and Simulation are not similar, but they both state that human society is a simulation of reality.

  • @NightwatchRebel Have to disagree, your use of the term 'reality' is reductive of Baudrillard's understanding of the Simulacrum. There is no such thing as 'R'eality, only representations, themselves empty pastiche; representations of other representations - Simulacrum. Indeed Baudrillard states it is the Simulacrum itself which is the real as it becomes our reality. Funnily enough this is also more akin to the Matrix program, which indeed in nothing like the 'Real' world. Simulations of nothing.

  • @Enigma6662 if human knowledge is disconnected from objective reality, then how can you use the term "desert of the real" incorrectly? welcome to THAT desert of the real, relativists

  • @jaziz69 what's the name of Baudrillard's book?

  • @renatonigro it's called Simulacra and Simulation. Trying to read it cover to cover at the moment instead of just using snipets for essays! Ah the free time you have when you finish your degree...

  • @jaziz69 Then again, Baudrillard was a bit of a wanker...

  • @voluptamors this is a valid point. But i'm sure when any of us becomes old enough to develop these kind of crazy ass thoughts we would most definitely have done our fair share of wanking

  • @jaziz69 did he watch it? if so cool!

  • @jaziz69 Perhaps some others do not approve of your inaccurate spelling of inaccurate.

  • Thumbs up for Baudrillard!

  • "It is the mental projection of your digital self." ...

    Wouldn't "digital projection of your mental self" (or something to that effect) make a lot more sense here?

  • @thetwentyfourth or would it?

  • If the mind is the source of the 'image' then the digital world must take that data and use it to create an appearance that others in the system (here, Morpheus) can see - A digital projection of Neo's internalized self-image - otherwise each person would be subjectively 'projecting' everyone elses' appearance too, ie perception of the virtual world would be subjective, which seems interesting but falls apart since consistency is needed for people's actions to make sense.

    ( @jkjk90 )

  • @thetwentyfourth actually mental does all projection and in this case it projected it self as digital self if it was other way it would have been digital self which is non existant really projecting the mental which what Neo and we all are, so no it would not have been better! :)

  • Welcome to the desert of the real

  • GOOD scene!

  • uhhhhh wha?

  • @goldengun5980 Watch The matrix trilogy... Fill that gap in your Education.

    Plus these are among the most entertaining movies to watch.

  • @galex50 dont worry I got this

  • Awesome movie!

  • This is suuuch a great film.

  • @CuriositysCat one of the bet of all time ! 

  • Thanks

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more