Added: 1 month ago
From: CongressmanRonPaul
Views: 226,130
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (2,213)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ron Paul - the one shining beam of light in that house of criminals.

  • I myself am a very left-wing anti-war activist and a fierce critic of Obama, but Ron Paul is dead wrong here. If you actually read the bill for yourself, section 1021e explicitly exempts US citizens, legal aliens, and anybody on US soil. The language is actually quite clear. There is nothing really new here. In fact, the new NDAA removes an old statute that allowed servicemen to legally rape their wives!

  • @mojorhythm If the language is so clear, why was the second definition of "covered persons" put into this bill as well? Those who introduced the NDAA believe that it could be applied to American citizens. In fact the Supreme Court has already ruled on detention of American citizens during war time, in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld in 2003. So you're right about one thing, this is nothing really new here. This has been going on for quite some time and is now being codified into law.

  • @99Steve The second definition of covered persons in section 1022 explicitly says "only for persons already authorized under section 1021."

  • I often disagree with Congressman Paul. However, he is spot-on here. He is one of the few members of the Federal Legislative Branch who actually cares about our Bill of Rights.

  • Federal Reserve was signed on Xmas.

    NDAA was signed on New Years Eve.

    Its always when nobody's looking...

  • @Ducky888888 one hand does one thing so no one sees the other. As bad as what we know is, what I'm scared of is what we don't know yet.

  • people we need to copy and paste this link to as many people we can, just to make everyone aware, the presidential race has nothing to do with reps vs dems, in the end these corrupt politicians have been doing whatever the gov't/corporations want them to do, people need to be objective and be aware and understand what is going on, the more people that know the harder it will be for the military to take over. The NDAA was passed on NEW YEARS EVE! Youtube >>>/watch?v=c5DTrRyMzLo&featur­e=related

  • My god can we not do something about this? Americans! Wake the fuck up! It is time to water the tree of liberty again!

  • Ron Paul 2012

  • Let us pray them to change their mind, miracle could happen. GOD never Fails.

  • the deconstruction of the united states of america and the construction of the divided states of terroramerica

  • In the 2006 NDAA, some idiot snuck in an a line that said the President could declare martial law without consent of congress. It was repealed. Assholes like Lindsey Graham (from SC) like to do this with the NDAA because it almost has to pass. People smarter than Lindsey, like Congressman Paul, work to get this rubbish out of our legislation. I believe it will be repealed. There have been attempts already. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has no need whatsoever for indefinite detention.

  • In Nazi, Germany it was the burning of the Reichstag.... here is was 9/11 and the subsequent so-called "Patriot Act." Now we have the NDAA. Congratulations to all of the ignorant, uninformed masses who played video games, sent texts and hung out on Facebook while our country and its fundemrental rights and liberties have been stolen from us. Seig Heil Obama.

  • @cincy2indy hehehe guilty wan't can I say college life makes you focus on college life so I missed out on the politics that was going on... but it there is no time to point fingers we can act now or wait until the government makes their move... truthfully I'd rather wait...

  • WATCH NAOMI WOLFS DOCUMENTARY THE END OF AMERICA

  • one of our founding fathers warned that if tyrrany comes to this country it will be under the guise of fighting a foriegn enemy......he was right!!!

  • REMEMBER REMEMBER THE 31ST OF DECEMBER

    THE NDAA TREASONOUS PLOT

    I CAN THINK OF NO REASON THAT DECEMBER 31ST

    SHOULD EVER BE FORGOT.

    THE ANSWER TO 1984 IS 1776

  • Take your constitutional rights back peacefully or by force. This is the law of the land

  • guilty until proven innocent?

  • So Ron Paul took off time from his presidential campaign so he could fight for our freedoms yet again?? Where does he get his energy?

    I wonder what Mitt Romney was doing that day?... 

  • @Starpilot149 bohemian grove probably.

  • The New World Order, controlled by the European and American banking families, have finally put the last nail in the coffin. The NDAA has removed our Constitutionally-guaranteed Rights.

    Have your rifles ready. They will be causing a spark to set off the next Civil War/Revolution SOON!

    God help us all! God save the Republic!

  • @TriggerJunkie Soon? Yes it's already begun in some countries. USA just sleeping on reality.

  • @TriggerJunkie youre half right, the very top of the NWO food chain is the vatican and the jesuit world order with the superior general of the jesuits. the damn jesuits were the ones who created the illuminati in 1773, look it up. rothschilds watch over the vatican treasury (vatican bank) but they follow orders from the jesuits/vatican who own that bank. all those euro and american families are part of knights of malta which are controlled by the jesuit order. dont believe me, look it up

  • The NDAA is no "national" bill at all.

    LOL

  • Ron Paul 2012

  • Is it your answer when hearing Ron Paul speak to month-off foul language here on YouTube. Then post comment as little as mentioning his name with some benign wording of nondescript support. The Guy is worth his weight in gold. It will take a Valley Forge of Ron Paul's to dent these suckers who at present own us. Get Organized and get Active it will take more, much more commitment then words alone. Other wise we are all cattle to the slaughter and not by human methods as that.

  • Who are the Americans that wrote their congressman and senators saying they wanted to give up their rights to a trial by jury?! I challenge

  • RON PAUL RON PAUL RON PAUL!!

  • Just finished reading "End the Fed" now working on "Liberty Defined" by Dr. Paul, next is "Human action" and "Liberalism" both by Mises

  • I hope you win Ron Paul.

  • and they can call you a terrorist if, You grow your Veggies, own guns legally, site the constitution, support Ron Paul, and so on and so on. and Please Before you respond by calling me names. Go over to google. "Department of Justice How to Identify Domestic terrorists" . You can go right to their Website Download the PDF file and read this for yourself.

  • God Bless Ron Paul. Pray the American people will see the light and vote for the honest candidate who has all along fought for our rights.

  • I DON'T THINK PEOPLE UNDERSTAND HOW FUCKED UP THIS IS....... ANYONE ANYONE ANYONE IN THE UNITED STATES AND BE CALLED A TERRORIST AND YOUR LIFE CAN END BY THE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT YOU BEING ABLE TO DEFEND YOURSELF ......

  • @BboyArmo Seems people are more interested in Kim Kardashian's divorce then our Constitution and Bill of Rights. RON PAUL IS THE LAST HOPE FOR AMERICA! Dear God, I am afraid for our country.

  • Comment removed

  • ATTENTION: Feb. 2012 DHS Report defines Americans as: Extreme Right Wing Terrorists -

    groups that subscribe to the following ideals: fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to international in orientation), anti-globalist... reverent of individual liberty (especially their right to own guns, and less taxes), believe in conspiracy theories that involve threats to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty... and/or national “way of life” is under attack and is either already lost or imminent...

  •  ron paul is for the people vote him in

  • This is like the "Never ending story". The nothing sweeping across the land. If they dont steal the election from Ron, they'll probably secretly replace him with a double, while he sleeps in the white house. American youth acts like they put something in their school lunch, or maybe it was the vaccines, but there is no way they will survive the hardships, of disconection from technology. They are dependent sheep.

  • Lindsey Graham is a traitorous piece of sht, like all the other puppets who voted for this tyrannical law. They have been so blatantly looking at us citizens as the enemy. Ron Paul 4 life.

  • Okay so...didn't Obummer (Obama) take an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution? Where in the Constitution does it say it's okay for the government to arrest and detain American citizens without a trial? His ass should have been impeached for violating his oath by signing the NDAA into law.....but he's still sitting on his ass in DC ruling over us. Big Brother's here

  • Also watch Paul's 'The Last Nail' speech (May 25, 2011) which is about NDAA 2012 as well.

    /watch?v=-olNr4UuVqY

  • fuck obama....

  • He did this DURING his presidental campaign! he's doing his job at such an important moment !

  • ok so, what is to stop them falsely arresting someone and falsely accusing them of some form of terrorism connection? since there is no fair trial and no attorney, no nothing, then how will we ever find out if people are really a terrorist or associate? they could be just someone they don't like so they grab them and say, "you must be a terrorist" which is double speak for " I know how to handle you, and you will never be heard from again".

  • I just read a neat sign on one of those "Comedy" channels...

    "Politicians should wear team jackets like the Formula 1 racers; so we could see who their corporate sponsors are.

    I bet Ron Paul's sponsors would all be \american Citizens. Who would the other candidates sport?

  • @Physhead

    ron paul's sponsors would be us army us navy and us marines

  • @zenokro Isn't that better than big business, Banking industry and big corporations, with YOUR dollar in their pockets?

  • George Orwell warned about this many years ago. The founding fathers of the USA warned about this even more years before that. And now it's happening. Scary stuff.

    I'm lucky to be Canadian. Of course our corrupt cronie "Conservative"(in name only) government is already trying to pass a SOPA-style bill and will soon try to turn our country into a "war-zone" as well. Things are going to get very ugly.

  • @kronker The only reason Tweedle Dumb was elected was because MOST of the opposition was too corupt. The only real Ron Paul type we had was under-rated and died shortly after his victory. I only hope Ron Paul fares better. Because Canada always follows what the Americans do. Maybe through Ron Paul, Canada has some hope of sanity...

  • All we need to do is look at Bradley Manning who was and is indefinitely detained before the NDAA was passed.The Government doesn't need the NDAA to indefinitely detain citizens,they've always had the power,they only passed the NDAA so they can indefinitely detain American citizens legally,out in the open and nice and neat without any difficulties.

  • @dadman1988 It is unfortunate that the USA, once the defender of rights and liberties is now headed towards a dictatorship / communist style government. I could seriously predict ALL of America's fundamental freedoms and idioms will be lost, unless you the people are strong enough to look the establishment and SPIT in their face. You don't need a revolution, you simply need to vote for Ron Paul.

  • mager laaaggggg

  • /watch?v=wQJC2MMB8nA

    

  • why isn't this man our president!?!?

    RON PAUL 2012! for freedom and the stop of CRONY capitalism.

  • @MrTitiez Because tyranny and crony capitalism are the order of the day in the banker-run USA. It's a shame.

  • @MrTitiez He is not our president because he is against the people that are running this country (the puppet masters) I bet you already knew that. Keep hitting that snooze button people and one day you'll wake up and realize you are late for work!

  • @MrTitiez More curious to me is why with all obvious support for RON PAUL is he not leading at the polls right now? OR IS HE? This would not surprise me one bit that the powers that be have told the media outlets to lie about the real results to keep Ron Paul from winning..If this is even remotely true, why people are still playing the "voting for Republican or Democrat" game....is the biggest question of all.

  • Comment removed

  • @peteyson5 Could we not make this personal, because we don't even know each other. Which is why I'm basing this strictly off of what is typed on here. I don't work for some "too big to fail" bank, nor I do agree with the notion. I think those banks should've failed and they should've been replaced. I also think Geithner needs to get out of the Treasury as soon as possible. He knows he's finished. We need less Goldman Sachs affiliates, a lot less, because they should've failed with Lehman Bros.

  • @WallStwizkid That's good to hear, but the reason those banks were bailed out is because members of the Federal Reserve were occupying high-level positions at the banks they were supposedly regulating.

  • @JR01620 The Federal Reserve had to call up the U.S. Treasury and request the bailouts. They may issue money, but the Treasury actually creates it. When you have the top member bank (Goldman Sachs) in need of a bailout, the board of govenors at the Fed calling up the Secretary of the Treasury, Tim Geithner (ex-Goldman Sachs), what do you think is going to happen? The only mystery here is, why did they decide to pull the plug on Lehman Bros.? We'll probably never know the real answer.

  • Comment removed

  • @peteyson5 *nor do I agree*.....How do I profit off the labor of others? Power positions? I wish. I'm not going to say I work for average retail investors, because it's mostly big retail tickets, which are standard in derivatives, because they're not really suitable for the average retail client, but I don't work for some big-time institutional type investor, and I don't handle over-the-counter derivatives. I noticed a misconception on here is, they group derivatives into the same category.

  • @peteyson5 The only thing derivatives have in common is the mathematical concepts introduced in calculus. Meaning, in this case, the pricing of the asset in relation to the financial product. That said, exchange-traded derivatives are standardized contracts, formally traded at "arms length" and regulated. The derivatives being scrutinized on here (without specification) are over-the-counter, off balance sheet, customized contracts, that are not regulated.

  • @WallStwizkid Further, I was wrong about the lines of credit issue with regard to the 16 trillion dollar loan (which was not published on the FED website at the time).... the GAO report clearly listed the billions the FED printed and sent to the major banks (without the approval of congress or the American people). I'm sorry for making it personal, it's just that your knowledge of intricacies of the economy, and your youtube name, inherently make the argument personal.

  • @peteyson5 It's very close to legalized fraud when they're used for market manipulation, since there's no regulation saying you have to file them on a balance sheet. The revised Basel 2 did require banks (for the first time) to include derivatives in when they file adjusted net capital. Sounds great, but when the SEC votes exemptions for the $5bill. and up club (Goldman, JPMorgan/Chase etc.) the requirements turn into a joke and grant unreasonable amounts of leverage, hence "too big to fail."

  • @WallStwizkid I say we stop arguing. If you believe that those banks shouldn't have been bailed out, I'm all with ya. The FED played a major role in making that bailout possible.

  • @JR01620 Well I do agree that those banks should've failed. Everybody was against the bailouts, except those banks. I'm not talking about their employees, I mean their board of directors and shareholders who are actually responsible for the decisions made. So let's not direct any protests at entry-level analysts that work for Goldman Sachs, they have nothing to do with it. Those banks recycle their employees, from analysts to VPs, like they recycle socks. They probably have good reason.

  • Comment removed

  • @WallStwizkid what who did? I'm done arguing, I've come to the conclusion that theres a good argument for maintaing a central banking system, but the reality is that our central bank is just a mechanism by which a few individuals can fully control both the private and public spheres of our economy and governance. It was nice debating you, I can't keep checking back on here. Again, I'm sorry for being an asshole earlier and bringing up your private life.

  • @JR01620 Do you want to know what they did? I'll explain exactly what they did.

  • @WallStwizkid If you want to message me what they did, I'd be glad to read it.

  • @JR01620 Okay look, it's real simple. First they go on a PR campaign. This includes wining and dining city and gov. officials so they can sell securities to them. The structure their pension funds, their benefits, everything. What's important here is, what they structure them into. They ALWAYS sell securities linked to the derivatives they're placing bets on. Then, they get them in credit default swaps. These swaps operate as follows-the seller of the swap is entitled to a premium

  • @JR01620 They work similar to the structure of an insurance policy. If the securities, whether it's bonds or any other debt instruments, default, the seller of the swap has to pay the default till it hits earnings or covers the deficit. They're all customized contracts, so the actual terms vary, but it's always structured like that. They then funnel the premiums into derivatives that bet against the positions they sold to their own clients. This enables them to increase leverage on bets

  • @WallStwizkid alright just message me this stuff, who are you talking about? And what point are you driving at?

  • @JR01620 What happens is, they make a ton of money. If they place bad bets, they're covered. Go look at the tapes in Congress and the Senate when they debated the bailouts. You're wrong about getting approval, they did. But see, they already knew they'd get approval, because for 1. they had capital exemptions. 2. they're not holding enough capital against losses. This means, once they're on the hook to pay all that bond insurance, and they can't afford it, guess what happens??

  • @WallStwizkid JR01620 is me, I was signed into my gmail account. I know thats how it works...but the $16 trillion loan was not part a part of TARP, nor was it public information at the time...just message me anything else you have to say, I can't keep coming back on here. 

  • @JR01620 What happens is, all those gov. officials that got suckered into those bets, start bribing other member of Congress and the Senate to approve the bailouts. Go look at the debates on the bailouts. Multiple senators got up and basically said, has anybody else in here get bribed? One politician said he had a a half a dozen congressmen come into his office saying "if you don't vote for the bailouts the whole market is going to crash, it'll drop 5k in a day, you have to."

  • @JR01620 Message you where? Oh like a private message? Okay, no problem. Sorry, I just received your responses now, after I typed all that.

  • @WallStwizkid yea sounds good, thanks. message to this username not the JR01620 one

  • Republicans aren't fighting this like they did the health care bill they all worked together to stop freedom

  • Comment removed

  • (cont.) "Such transactions represent a grant in the course of one single year of about $7,000,000 to every member bank of the Federal Reserve System. Is it any wonder that there is a depression in this country? Is it any wonder that American labor, which ultimately pays the cost of all banking operations of this country, has at last proved unequal to the task of supplying this huge total of cash and credit for the benefit of the stock-market manipulators and foreign swindlers?”-Sen McFadden 1932

  • “In 1928 the member banks of the Federal Reserve system borrowed $60,598,690,000 (that's billions, in 1928 US$...Ed) from the Federal Reserve banks on their fifteen-day promissory notes. Think of it! Sixty billion dollars payable upon demand in gold in the course of one single year. The actual payment of such obligations calls for six times as much monetary gold as there is in the entire world. (cont in next comment)

  • Comment removed

  • @WallStwizkid In sum, you can keep using your economic lingo to make it appear as if you have "won the argument" or "taught me a lesson", but it's clear that you are just another Wall Street scum looking after yourself and nobody else. I'm going to admit that I'm not an economic expert, I'm just an undergrad poli-sci major. but it's easy to see how the wealth gap in this nation effectively prevents us from existing as a true democratic republic. So I say, fuck the current system, and lets evolve

  • watch?v=KONpt9a6HrI&feature=re­lated

  • The only few differences between politricks is, birthdays, place of birth, faces, and skin tone, but besides that there all the same, just look at all the bs promised by Obastard to get him in office and all that hes done sence hes been in. Its all a big joke sence the days of of gods knows, but we know that aint shit thats going to change.

  • Opposing NDAA is outrageous. There has NEVER been a war where U.S. citizens that side with the enemy were allowed due process. Nobody even read NDAA because if they did, they'd know it was light compared to past policies during times of war. In fact, it offered more rights to citizens guilty of TREASON than any past war plan. Nobody is going to rush somebody off to a detention center for spray painting a street sign. It specifically states caught in an ACT OF WAR. Stupid kids on here.

  • @WallStwizkid You obviously don't know your history, the U.S. Constitution, or the law. Is the comparison we should make between what was done in the past and what is being done now, or should it be a comparison to the "supreme law of the land," as all laws are supposed to be passed in pursuance thereof? The NDAA "offers" more rights? Excuse me? Our "rights" are unalienable, meaning they don't come from the government. What the government gives, the government can take away.

  • @PatriotWatchDog Can you explain which rights exactly are taken from you under NDDAA? Thanks.

  • @WallStwizkid - Geezuz, the world is dumber for the comments you've made about supporting or not caring about NDAA.

  • @magentawave Can you explain which of your rights have been taken away under NDAA? Thanks.

  • @WallStwizkid - Well not yet, but thats like saying there is a guy ten miles away coming to kill you - but you're okay at the moment. You go right ahead and keep trusting in these people that don't give one rats ass about you. I can only assume you are very young and naive.

  • @magentawave How old are you exactly? Because I've studied economics, which means libertarians are fair game when they discuss it, and I've been working within the financial markets for over 8 years, and I'm 30. It's funny how you mention my age, when the overwhelming majority of Ron Paul supporters are the youngest demographic of voters. That's not saying much. I wouldn't want the country to listen to me back when I was in college, because it probably wouldn't exist right now.

  • @magentawave That said, NDAA is relatively light compared to past policies during times of war. There has never been a war that granted due process to citizens that side with the enemy. The provisions that relate to the parts of NDAA that people are concerned with are pretty specific, and apply to citizens (or foreigners) caught in an act of war. That doesn't mean some kid spray painting a street sign is going to disappear forever. Due process is for criminal acts, not terrorism.

  • @magentawave You know what's funny? You're panicking over nothing. You need to stop believing everything you hear, because panic profiteers (conspiracy theorists) know how gullible you are and take advantage of it. Don't feel bad though, the mainstream media got taken for a ride on NDAA too. What happened was, some spammer edited a video of Senator Carl Levin, and then continued to tweet it 45 times over 24 hours. So some loser did this at a rate of almost twice an hour.

  • @magentawave He set of a "waive of online freakouts of epic proportions." Fox news, Ron Paul, and many others were taken for a ride on this, so don't feel bad. Want to know what was really said in the Senate which is stated in the actual bill that you guys need to freakin read already and stop flipping out? I'll paste it here.." Mr. LEVIN. Second, the new bill would modify the detainee provisions to address concerns and misconceptions about the provisions in our initial bill.....

  • @magentawave In particular, the new bill first modifies section 1031 of the bill, as requested by the administration, to assure that the provision that provides a statutory basis for the detention of individuals captured in the course of hostilities conducted pursuant to the 2001

  • @magentawave authorization for use of military force, the AUMF, to make sure that those provisions and that statutory basis are consistent with the existing authority that has been upheld in the courts and neither limits nor expands the scope of the activities authorized by the AUMF.

  • @magentawave Contrary to some statements I have seen in the press, the detainee provisions in our bill do not include new authority for the permanent detention of suspected terrorists. Rather, the bill uses language provided by the administration to codify existing authority that was adopted by both the Bush administration and the Obama administration and that has been upheld in the Federal courts.

  • @magentawave I want to repeat that. For the first time, this bill provides that, in determining a detainee’s status, the detainee will have access to a lawyer and to a military judge. That is not the case now. Nor would the bill preclude the trial of terrorists in civilian courts, as some have erroneously asserted. As a matter of fact, it is the contrary.

  • @magentawave The bill expressly authorizes the transfer of any military detainee for trial in the civilian courts at any time. An amendment that eliminated that authority was defeated in the Armed Services Committee on a bipartisan 19-to-7 vote during the markup of the initial bill.

  • @magentawave The administration officials reviewed the draft language for this provision the day before our markup and recommended additional changes. We were able to accommodate those recommendations, except for the administration request that the provision apply only to detainees who are captured overseas.

  • @magentawave There is a good reason for that. But even here, the difference is relatively modest, because the provision already excludes all U.S. citizens. It also excludes all lawful residents of the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution. The only covered persons left are those who are illegally in this country

  • @magentawave or who arrive as tourists or on some other short-term basis, and that is a small remaining category, but an important one, because it includes the terrorists who clandestinely arrive in the United States with the objective of attacking military or other targets here."

  • @WallStwizkid Your occupation: "Finance-risk management through derivatives and speculative investing". Glad to know your part of the problem. Although you seemingly have a good understanding of the intricacies of our economic structure, it's clear that you are merely supporting the status quo to benefit yourself, and not the majority of Americans. With millions of unemployed people in this country, dicks like you sit back, and prey off of others.

  • @WallStwizkid Yea, in high school I was taught 2-3% inflation is good for the economy. But hyper-inflation has become a real risk in America unless we do something about the FED. "To fight this recession the FED needs more than a snapback; it needs soaring household spending to offset moribund business investment. And to do that, as Paul McCulley of Pimco put it, Alan Greenspan needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq Bubble." Krugman-2002

  • @WallStwizkid So bud, keep spurting intricacies at me, I don't care. The FED exists to funnel money from the poor to the rich (and swallow up local banks... if you still haven't checked out the GAO report, they have a nice chart with regard to this). Oh, and the GAO report found that 18 current and former Fed board members were affiliated with banks and companies that were deemed “too big to fail” and bailed out during the economic crisis. I SAY THATS FUCKING CORRUPTION.

  • Comment removed

  • "it doesn't matter who the people vote for, they always vote for us" - Stalin. Ron Paul is a puppet verbalizing the concerns of the conflict theorist only to appease them and give them false hope. If he was really about it, he would be dead.

  • #1st short comment

  • Ron Paul for Puerto Rico.

    Our Republican Party Primary is in March 18, 2012. Is an open primary. Anyone can vote.

  • RON PAUL TO FUCK UP THE GOVERNMENT 2012! TIME FOR CHANGE!

  • I got her from watch?v=swBm11GzIUY

  • This is to @ANONALTERNATE. I hope you remember how you supported those who want to take away your rights and freedom when the military under orders of the NDAA put you into a FEMA concentration camp.

  • @scitreb

    i think you need to read a little bit closer, i support freedom and the constitution, NOT the NDAA which is a treasonous act of epic proportions. i challenge them to try and put me into a fema concentration camp, i will kill anyone who tries, the freedom of me and mine is worth more to me than my life. so please, read other comments and check into what you are saying before you type it

  • So, we should have Obama, Eric Holder, and everyone else involved in The Fast and Furious gun smuggling campaign, detained indefinately for supporting terrorism on the US border and the assassination of US Border Patrol agent Brian Terry!

  • bored

  • How does anyone have accuarate info on the FRS if it is above the law. Has it been audited yet?

  • RON PAUL 2012!

  • @bocefuss Wow. So you can't even tell me. I DID hear the speech, actually, don't think you know that I didn't. It is hard for me to remember every damn thing that he says.

  • @bocefuss All right, so tell me. What DID he say about Iran?

  • AikenBruce has to be a paid agent, if not by a special interest, then someone posing as a Paul supporter, only to turn undecided voters away by his assassination rhetoric.

  • According to Google Fight, Ron Paul comes up with 12.4 million results, George Washington comes up with15.9 million, Newt Gingrich comes up with 467 million.

    WAKE UP! VOTE FOR THE FIRST GUY!

  • *** CRITICAL WARNING ***

    God forbid any military attack or threat to a citizen

    When we have that,

    then it is time for government to go

    Install Ron Paul immediately

    Millions of supporters required to assemble on mass

    We have the Supreme Court testimony of the voting being rigged.

    Why are we forgetting that Barry is illegitimate??

    Put a bullet in his head already.

  • @littlelored100

    well first the US gave osama bin laden money to train soldiers to fight against russia, then it evolved from there.

  • @DAROtheonly1 You got that right. It's amazing how little facts like that seem to slip under the radar when 9/11 and the wars in the middle east are mentioned. Lets just ignore the fact that our government practically created bin Laden's power and organization.

  • i live in a gun ridden place. everyone respects guns. they are not a problem if brought up by parents with the decency to teach their kid the importance and to respect their power. guns are not bad, and if they are made illegal, good luck.

    back on topic, if Obama had us in his best interests, why use "transparency" and hide the true nature of these bills being passed? he is no American at all.

  • Do you know how the Taliban came into existence? Dig a little and see how deep the rabbit hole goes. It is deep and dark.

  • You should stop drinking the koolaid and wakeup.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • Comment removed