A Message From A Concerned Western Imperialist Aggressor. Part 1

[xjames118]

Nightmarish. Gobshyte. American. Like all capitalist, pro-imperialist nothings, he only has two weapons in his arsenal; empty rhetoric and the most wildly-polarised examples of Islamic fundamentalism. I'd rather have a spiritually advanced society that, in some places, is blatantly unfair, than a blatantly unfair society which is DYING, which is what we have in the West. Even if the fundamentalists were a little bit more tolerant, and we were a little less arrogant, we'd still be arch-enemies.

[Wulfshade]

Yeah, burn 'em muslim extremists and their christian counterparts. The world will be a better place without them, if you ask me. Here we have a good example of a delusional leftist. I'm not a rightwinger, but i can say that sometimes the left goes too far.

[SmoothInstigator]

This redfist guy is one seriously hypocritical asshat.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic calm the fuck down, instead of reading you insane ramblings, I watched your Iraq war vid, I see the thesis, your a drunk guy on YouTube who has gone gay for Hitchens and the Military, its "The Never Ending War on Everything" , and dude you are trolling on your own channel, it's sad, and pathetic. and you still have yet to answer my question.

[SardonicSkeptic]

No you had it right the first time! I have been stained by the word NIGGER!!!!!! It's deep within my soul now! I can't get it out! EVERYTHING IS RACIST!!!! I'm drinking a rum and coke now and all I can think of is how much I want to lynch it because it's black! It reminds me of NNNNNNIIIIIIGGGGGGGAAAAARRRRSS­SSSS!!!!

Oh wait, you said I went Gay for Hitchens and the military! That makes you homophobic and racist! RACIST HOMOPHOBE WHO USES THE WORD NIGGER!!!!!!! WAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic now your projecting, He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you

[SardonicSkeptic]

And when you leave pseudo profundities and baseless accusations of racism under the slightest provocation, people will realize you're completely full of shit.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Oh, I meant NIGGGGGGGGGGGGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR­RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!­!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(passes out on the floor due to lack of oxygen)

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic you outrage is not justifed in the argument, your context of the use of 'sand nigger' is a profoundly racist statement, whereas 'jarhead' is closer to a baseless insult. big fucking difference. people can decide whether I'm a bigot or not, check my page this is a public forum, they can think for themselves, and my last post was a quote for Nietzsche. I based my disagreement based upon evidence I was shown, and let's tally n-word useage ms.high and mighty

[SardonicSkeptic]

YOU SAID IT AGAIN! YOU SAID NIGGER AGAIN! YOU'RE WORSE THAN HITLER!!!! HE SAID NIGGGGGGGGGEERRRRRRRR!!!!! WAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!

(punches bystander in the face and then proceeds to explain the raving hysterics brought on by a military hating self righteous racialist)

[clownporn1]

much like Glenn Beck, your projecting again, trolling, what's with the fucking trolling Man up,Bitch! I want the truth!

[SardonicSkeptic]

Why did you feel the need to bring Glenn Beck into this? Why do you need to believe I'm racist? why do you need to believe the Canadian soldier is guilty of war crimes for doing something that any soldier would tell you was a kindness? Why do you need to keep posting on my channel? Go away and I will never speak to you again. But don't think you can come on my channel and post bullshit unchallenged. This is my corner of the internet. You're in my house. If you don't like it leave.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Most users would have blocked you by now and deleted your comments. I know you would have. Ask yourself why I haven't.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic your desperate for subs

[SardonicSkeptic]

I'm telling this to you.  Get off my channel. You are not welcome here. i don't care if i go up by one sub or not. Go away. That's why I rejected your friend request. Which by the way was rather pathetic.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic this is a public forum, if you do not have the stomach for critcism or ridicule don't post vids, I want to post vids, I just don't have enough free time of disk space, Yes this is your channel and you have every right to block me, surprised you haven't, and kudos for keeping free speech alive, I don't agree on your political views, we can disagree. But fuck I love a good debate, your a good man, just blinded by his hatred

[SardonicSkeptic]

I clearly do have the stomach for this shit as I have not blocked you, or anyone for that matter. Whining about how I'm trolling you on my channel leads me to believe that you don't.

And what the fuck do you mean, good man but blinded by hatred!? If I have an abundance of unjustified hatred then clearly I'm a hateful person and thus an evil man. I wish you'd have the balls to admit at least that. For fucks sake man have some god damned convictions!

[clownporn1]

fear and loathing in the internets, my convictions are based upon rational thought and 20cc's of not trying to fuck with other peoples lives, and don't tread on me or get nuked from orbit, 9/11 fucked all our lives and were in this together

[ytAsylum]

@clownporn1 I agree. Agree! Agree! Orick says Politics are just as shitty as religion! It never fails.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Also I wasn't aware you had a question or that you were obliged to stay in my comment section all night. I haven't posted jack on your channel. But I don't like associating with racist homophobic people who use the word nigger in a conversation so it's understandable. Now if you'll excuse me I'll divulge into hysterics again. RACIST HOMOPHOBIC NIGGER RACIST NAZI HOMOPHOBE IMPERIALISTIC MILITANT NIGGER HATING RACIST HOMOPHOBEIS NIGGER SAYING RACIST HOMOPHOBE NIGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEERRRRRRRRRR!!­!!!!

[clownporn1]

sardonic I dissagree, you have all the personalty of a child molester, I saw the cbc newscast and the poor SOB was an unarmed civillian, killing civillians is a war crime by the GENEVA CONVENTION, you are a pig ingnorant fucktard. know international treaties before you turn a fucking camera on

[SardonicSkeptic]

That wasn't the press release I said. For one it's very rare that unarmed civilians are taken prisoner. For two it's rare that unarmed civilians partake in a firefight with coalition forces. For three the Geneva convention does not apply to unlawful combatants. For four capitalizing nothing but what you're attempting to scream through the internets makes you look like an idiot.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic unlawful combatants is an illegal term to make torture, inhumane treatment, and murder legal, this is article 5: Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal.

[clownporn1]

this means that the article 4 to which concerns POWs and the treatment said thereof unlawful combatants in reality goes like this A combatant who does not qualify for POW status can under the provisions of the Geneva Conventions expect to be treated humanely; and before he is punishe, can expect to get a trial in "a regularly constituted court." and The last time that American and British unlawful combatants were executed after "a regularly constituted court" was the Luanda Trial as mercenaries

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic The laws and Constitution are designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times."

and to subvert the constitution and Habius Corpus, is only legal in terms of martial law on sovergn soil. in this case the civillian was UNARMED, and was killed, had he been armed you argument would be sound, and FUCK YOU and the horse you rode in on, you condecending fuck

[SardonicSkeptic]

Well as long as we're being civil. I still want to know how he qualifies as a civilian. A civilian carrying a weapon or having discharged his weapon at coalition forces tends not to qualify as a civilian. Moreover, the man was dieing. I find it amusing that you'll fall into hysterics over some rather tenuous legal technicalities but show no particular concern for the welfare of the soldiers or the actual humane treatment of the person in question. I certainly wouldn't want to die by inches.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic so the geneva convention and the constitution are just "legal technicalities" and don't apeal to emotion for the stupid jarhead who shot the stupid dying fuck. the fact is the isurgent was unarmed and wounded, the rag doll would be under both the 3rd and 4th geneva conventions so they carry his ass to medic and sew his ass up for trial in a civillian court. then he can rot for all i care, its just summary excution is illegal. let the courts decide his fate

[SardonicSkeptic]

Stupid Jar heard? Fuck you. Fuck your mother. and Fuck everyone who looks like you. I hope you die in a suicide bombing. Also he's an insurgent now? Get your story straight and then come back to me.

[clownporn1]

A writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum, also known as "The Great Writ", is a summons with the force of a court order addressed to the custodian demanding that a prisoner be brought before the court, together with proof of authority, allowing the court to determine whether that custodian has lawful authority to hold that person; if not, the person shall be released from custody. The prisoner, or another person on his behalf (for example, where the prisoner is being held incommunicado).

[clownporn1]

may petition the court or an individual judge for a writ of habeas corpus.

The right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus has long been celebrated as the most efficient safeguard of the liberty of the subject. The British jurist Albert Venn Dicey wrote that the Habeas Corpus Acts "declare no principle and define no rights, but they are for practical purposes worth a hundred constitutional articles guaranteeing individual liberty."

[clownporn1]

In most countries, however, the procedure of habeas corpus can be suspended in time of national emergency. In most civil law jurisdictions, comparable provisions exist, but they may not be called "habeas corpus

[clownporn1]

The writ of habeas corpus is one of what are called the "extraordinary" "common law",or "prerogative writs" which were historically issued by the courts in the name of the monarch to control inferior courts and public authorities within the kingdom The most common of the other such prerogative writs are quo warranto, prohibito, mandamus procedendo and certiorari When the original 13 American Colonies declared independence and became a constitutional republic in which the people are the sovereign

[clownporn1]

The due process for such petitions is not simply civil or criminal, because they incorporate the presumption of nonauthority. The official who is the respondent has the burden to prove his authority to do or not do something. Failing this, the court must decide for the petitioner, who may be any person, not just an interested party. This differs from a motion in a civil process in which the movant must have standing, and bears the burden of proof. I hope this clears things up

[SardonicSkeptic]

You got that from Wikipedia.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic no shit, I guess you can read, so read it before you blow a load over this STUPID JARHEAD, the insurgent is the unlucky fucker he shot, your confused, makes sense your a conservative so since I gave you a source to work off the context of the shooting, which was illegal, since you think it is not throw out 400 years of legal safety nets for both you and me, summary executions are wrong, think you stupud fuck

[SardonicSkeptic]

I love how you misspelled stupid.

I also think your blind ignorance of how war has been fought over 400 years is hilarious. Seriously though, go to Afghanistan, into the Taliban controlled areas and serve your subpoenas. I'd love to see your bullet ridden corpse on the news. See if you wish there were a few "Jarheads" then.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic this is absurd statement, funny and i enjoy it, this Jarhead asshole was court martialed, his superior Jarhead saw his actions and handed him his ass. Summary executions are illegal, even if he was wounded, and it was habaes corpus that has been intact for 400 years, not the war you stupid pompus fuck. I have frends I went high school with who served in Afghanistan, the place is a shit hole and we shouldn't be there

[SardonicSkeptic]

That's not what I said, learn to read.

Oh and why not send them a letter to your "friends". Quite frankly I don't know how they could stand you.

[clownporn1]

what the fuck are you talking about, this is lutzy, I'am talking about the issue of summary executions, to which you have ignored, fine most conservatives are fucking cowards, crazy... but still fucking cowards

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic since you are not refuting my points and trying to act all tough with your weak threats,Terrorism is only a means to an end; in this respect, a 'war on terror' makes no more sense than a war on submarines. BRING IT ON!

[SardonicSkeptic]

Love how you changed the subject.  Sorry but reciting Farhenhiet9/11 isn't impressive to anyone to anyone who hasn't had a lobotomy.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic nice you live in Ottawa too lol, good, lets meet

[SardonicSkeptic]

Well I see knowledge about my whereabouts equals your knowledge about world politics. I haven't set foot in Ottawa in half a decade.

[clownporn1]

I could give you my phone number

[SardonicSkeptic]

And I could shove a glazed ham up my ass and light myself on fire. I wouldn't recommend that either.

I love how you were so up your own ass about legalities yet your so eager to push a situation that's likely to wind up in an assault case. If you want to wind up in jail for some shit said on the internet do it with someone else. I actually think my life's worth something.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic lets remember, you threatened me, so this is a slippery slope your in case, you know that. I gave you proper discourse, and you thew shit, what do you expect. dude you ignored my comments and trolled when you couldn't answer, so I man'd up and now I demand a fucking answer, ad homs mean nothing to me, answer ME you coward fuck

[SardonicSkeptic]

Right I'm trolling on my own fucking channel. that makes perfect sense. I'd also like to know when I threatened you? I simply expressed a wish for you to suffer at the hands of the people you defend. Essentially to grant your wish. To cease the protection of your "stupid jarhead friends" and leave you naked before the people they defend you against. I would call that poetic justice.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Furthermore I believe I recall pointing out the glaring problems in your legal interpretations. I would also like to add that the Geneva conventions are in no way perfect or handed down by some benevolent God. I know you liberals believe that everything that comes out of Europe must be infallible but I urge you to examine your faith in such laughably weak assumptions. Besides you're not here for a reasoned debate, so stop pretending otherwise. No one is reading this but you and me.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Finally if you did in fact believe that I was threatening you why would you offer a means of contact? For someone who has nothing but contempt for our brave soldiers you are rather bloodthirsty. Oh well, typical left wing hypocrisy.

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic, well... 'simply expressed a wish for you to suffer at the hands of the people you defend' is still a threat, no matter how you slice it I never once said that Jarheads are bad just this asshole who killed an unarmed asshole, you ingnored this and took a hissy when I used slang for the marine this is not poetic justice since you didn't have all the facts. and to clarify creationists use threats like yours all the time and the part where you wanted me blowed up is kinda a threat

[SardonicSkeptic]

No, no it's not. a threat is an indication that a person will take personal action to inflict suffering on his antagonist, usually accompanied by an ultimatum. Try to speak English. It's oh so important to continuing this very fruitful conversation.

The way in which you used to term was an insult based on who he was. how would you react if I said, he was right to kill that sand-nigger? What could you extrapolate about my worldview from that statement?

[SardonicSkeptic]

Also what the fuck is it with dime store atheists and accusing everyone about being a creationist. not everything is about god you fucking Dawkins zombie!

[clownporn1]

well well, wait long enough, and you get the truth, you hate sand niggers. well FUCK YOU you racist fucktard. your worldview is sad and impotent, and I pity you, learn criminal and civil law as well as Foreign policy before you act like an asshole to a fucker who can't speak english too well. and clearly you misunderstand language, that's alright your lutzy, and that's fine

[SardonicSkeptic]

You made about 12 grammatical errors in that post. Also I was clearly pointing out what would be safe assumptions based on the words I could choose. I do not use such words because it would be wrong and because people would assume things about me that aren't true.

Jesus Christ, it's like talking to a fucking child.

[clownporn1]

the difference between jarhead and sand nigger, is one could be considered derogatory, and the other Used particularly in a racist way. so you fucking lose sir

[SardonicSkeptic]

Nigger is also used a positive light. Listen to any rap song. At any rate I am not such a racialist that I am barred from using racist terminology in a comparison. If you really need this kind of assistance, replace sand nigger with Prophet-monkey.

Also were you raped by the grammar fairy?

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic nigger is only fine when it is spoken by a nigger, you are not that makes you a bigot racist fuck. Forbidden on most all of television and other forms of public entertainment, at times referenced to as the "n-word".your right the word itself is not inherntly evil, just the racist asshole who says it, this makes you a muslim hating bigot, may i ask why do hate people of middle eastern discent?

[SardonicSkeptic]

And you're not a soldier. So where do you get off using the term Jarhead in a derogatory sense?

Oh wait, you said the word nigger in the comment section! He said NIGGER!

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER!!!! Oh my god Clownporn1 is a Nazi! Hey everyone Clownporn1 supports the holocaust because he used the word NIGGER in a conversation! Holly fuck we have someone worse than Hitler! Didn't you read the Geneva convention and the constitution?!

[SardonicSkeptic]

I mean how can we use nigger in a conversation and expect not to be equated with genocidal maniacs! There's no way out clownporn1! NO FUCKING WAY OUT!!!!!! Quick give me your phone number, I'll do a reverse google search and find your house and we'll do a murder suicide thing! How can we let racist people like us live in this world! when one person uses the word NIGGER in the comment section and another person uses it too the FABRIC OF SOCIETY IS BOUND TO COLLAPSE!!!!!

[SardonicSkeptic]

I wanted to type a comment that was all caps of the word nigger like NNNIIIIGGGAEEEEERRRRR!!! but it wouldn't let me. I guess youtube is almost as retarded as you hu?

[clownporn1]

@SardonicSkeptic Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No man shall be deprived of his life arbitrarily & The Death] penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgment rendered by a competent court

[SardonicSkeptic]

How bout if one open fires on our soldiers? I'd love to see your dumb ass running through crossfire to deliver subpoenas.

[AndrewTheEternal]

Pity on the reason for the suit. I was going to congratulate you on finding employment again.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Still nothing yet, man... Shame.

[TheAtheistAntidote]

Redfits you got chewed up and swallowed then spewed back up then spanked then traded for a cheap thrift store suit then bought back at a pwn shop then shredded into prices like soviet Russia.

SS well done. I'll be in Canada tomorrow and if I run into you your drink is on me.

[redFISTofEUROPE]

wow, how creative. i bet you plagarized that aswell.

[Ilikenuman]

@redFISTofEUROPE

nods approvingly*

[Nate2203]

Woah dumbfuck, we are not the world police, I thought you were conservative??? Nope, obviously just a republican. You call that insurgent a terrorist, just like he called our soldiers terrorists, just because they are the minority, they are the "terrorists", huh? Terrorists don't fight armies, they fly planes into buildings, like that moron in Austin today.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Yea, they also throw acid in the faces of girls attempting to learn. Go ahead, go suck up to him.

I also love how you can't comprehend how someone could despise a foreign death cult without being racist. It really is a window into your character.

So much for conservatives claiming to stand for morality.

[Nate2203]

I never said anything about you being racist, when I said "minority", I was refering to the fact that there are way less insurgents than coalition forces.

Those are REPUBLICANS that CLAIM to stand for morality(theirs), not just conservatives in general. We can't just go to every country where they do shit like that and fucking make them do what we want them to. Again, we are NOT the world police, we can make sure that stuff like that doesn't happen to our citizens and in our country...

[SardonicSkeptic]

Love the capslock sweetheart. But thanks for admitting you're not a moral person.

[Nate2203]

morality is relative, I have my own morality, just as you have yours. And I held down the shift key, thank you very much :-P

[SardonicSkeptic]

So I'll rape your mother and you shouldn't expect the police to care. Why care yourself, after all if my morality says rape is ok what's the problem. not getting angry about it is the perfect way to show you are enlightened.

[Nate2203]

I'm assuming rape is illegal in Canada too, so I would hope the law-enforcement officers would enforce the laws of their country.

[SardonicSkeptic]

and if they didn't?

[Nate2203]

...but that's all the jurisdiction we have. Not to mention that the people in these countries aren't really ready to govern themselves anyways, the majority will rule and that means the minority will suffer. That's all they know. When they decide to rise up themselves against oppressive rule, then we can help them out(like the french did for us), but until then...

[SardonicSkeptic]

And when you take a few casualties from the forces of barbarism you'll run screaming for home claiming some nonsense about them not willing to govern themselves.

also the French never gave a fuck about American Liberty or independence. They just hated Britain.

[Nate2203]

So then we should take over the world because they might hurt us??? That's what that kind of logic implies. Hell, religion is the catalyst for it all, let's ban it, right??? Government is there to govern the people that are under it, that's it.

[SardonicSkeptic]

You are aware region is not some magic malevolent entity right? It actually matters what the religion preaches. And no, there is no need to "take over the world" We must instead do what one can to protect our human rights, which are universal and do not apply just to Americans. There is no need for the united States to annex Canada or effect regime chance since (as I can attest as a resident here) we are not chucking acid in the face of young students. (For example)

[Nate2203]

All religion is stupid and the leaders can manipulate their followers however they want, that's pretty damn dangerous(I really would never consider banning it though), basically they're all potential terrorists.

The problem is that they will not govern themselves the way we want them to so we will have to actually take over their government to get the result that we want. Things will stay the same, just new faces. Are they coming to Canada and throwing acid in students faces? ...

[SardonicSkeptic]

No but honour killings are showing up more and more in the news.

[Nate2203]

In Canada? Then they can do something about it, it's called the death penalty. That will stop "honor" killings.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Yea but they happen down south too. In states that have the death penalty.

[Nate2203]

...Didn't think so. Once they do, your government has the right to do something about it(or if it happens to one of their citizens in another country).

[SardonicSkeptic]

And what if the government doesn't care? You know for an American you seem to be a complete shill for government authority as if it is moral in and of itself.

[Nate2203]

I'm not, but what does that have to do with international policy??? All I'm saying is that if there is a law put in place by the govt. then they have an obligation to enforce it. It is moral in and of itself, a governments rules and regulations are the morality of the govt.

[SardonicSkeptic]

You mean like the Nuremberg Laws?

[Nate2203]

Yes, laws, those are over 50 years old and are a horrible example. Our government would never be allowed to make such laws, so it's pretty much irrelevant. It's still an example of morality, theirs was hating and killing jews.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Clarify that. Because it sounds like you think it was moral for Germany to initiate the holocaust because it was lawful under German law. Please tell me I misread you.

[Nate2203]

Morals aren't always good.

[SardonicSkeptic]

You're fucking sick.

[Nate2203]

Why, because I know the definition of morality? Anyone who says "at least I have morals" or tries to tell someone that they don't have morals, is a fucking moron. I never said what they did was right, based upon our collective human morality(and my personal morality) what they did was very wrong.

[zydilak]

Hey SardonicSkeptic. This is Espinozaize. Just on my other account.

You said to me that in certain cases you would prefer a religious state to A secular one. Giving the Soviet Union as an example.

However the Soviet Union was not a secular state. A secular state is one which does not have an official position in regard to religion, but leaves that question to the private citizens. The Soviet state was Atheist: Attempting to destroy all religion

[SardonicSkeptic]

Fair enough. I was just pointing out that the religious issue is only one issue on a broad spectrum of issues.

[pokerslut530]

helping to create?? ehh can't agree with you there... he's definitely DEFENDING it but.... not out there helping it (i'd hope).

aaaagghhh enough of the acid girl :( that's so sad and plain fucked.

That dude is PAINFUL to listen to try to read. I understand english probably isn't his first language and must say he does speak quite fluently otherwise.

Entertaining vid.

[pokerslut530]

4:45 FUCKING AMEN.

[TheAtheistAntidote]

This is the an intellectual bare hinney spanking plain and simple. If I have to fork out the money myself you have got to get a TV show. This is pure gold!

[JJAngelton]

I do like the suit.

[danielthesard]

I'm surprised that you did not bring up the awful reality fact of FEMALE genital mutilation which is common practice in much of the middle east. And thats just for being female. Now just imagine what these "Islamic extremists" cough* cough* Terrorists do to homosexuals, adulterers, and those who wish to not fallow the religious laws to the tee. It's sad really that people can be so two sided in their logi: support freedom and life but at the same time support slavery and death. It baffles me.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Hell yes. I would have mentioned that but I wanted to drive home a specific image and a specific crime. I wanted that drilled into people's heads so maybe they wouldn't be so comfortable making a moral equivalence argument again. If I can do that then they might actually listen when I bring up the execution of homosexuals or FGM or the murder of converts.

[RankAndFileGuy]

"... no wonder Soviet Union fell apart." that made me almost spill my coffee, haha.

[LordClydeofOMAR]

I've been meaning to do my "Telltale Totalitarian Tactics" series for a while, I but keep procrastinating with it. I've considered canceling it, but the more I hear from the redFISTofEUROPE, the more I want to do it.

So by all means redFIST, keep doing what you're doing.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Your western imperial overlord commands you to do it!

[LordClydeofOMAR]

@SardonicSkeptic

Aye aye, Cap'n! Given the current controversy over KassieDill's suspension, now is the PERFECT time to present the 1st Tell Tale Totalitarian Tactic: Censorship.

[redFISTofEUROPE]

you porppably overlooked my my comment saying, "I don't give a shit".

mischaracterise me as much as you want. i don't really give a damn.

Try to be deceptive and Intentionally dishonest about my beliefs, I don't care. your opinion has no value to me anymore.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Oh no I didn't. Sorry cuddle bum but I didn't do this vid for you.

[5b]

You can't be "mistcharacterized" (<-- Isn't even a word by the way.)

It's abundantly obvious you're just an extremely ignorant socialist who wants his cake and eat it too, all the while ignoring other peoples suffering if it does not directly affect you.

Such is all socialists.

This doesn't surprise me one bit. You're against freedom of speech, which is why you blocked me when you couldn't beat me in a debate.

Have fun Redfist. Your trolling days are almost gone.

[redFISTofEUROPE]

I blocked you because you are a condescening piece of shit and not because I "couldn't beat you in a debate".

what you call debating is proppably similar what deryk tries here. you tried strawmaning me the same way he does here. all you guys can do is to make up some bullshit about me and then talk about that. you guys can't actually adress what i've said, if you would you'd fucking do it.

his video is full of lies and it doesn't surprise me that you buy into them.

[Espinozaize]

You are such a joke. Mr:" I am a Communist, until I realise the atrocities excused by this ideology". Wops!. Now I am Mr:" Just a Socialist". Real classy.

So which part is he wrong about?? The Canadian soldier? Or that it is inconsistent for an atheist-socialist to support the Religious-fundamentalist Taleban against the Secular USA? Also only people can get offended Freespeech can be suppressed. But it seldom get offended or angry for that matter But I guess there is no getting through to you

[SardonicSkeptic]

Well for the record, I do think that a secular state could be in the wrong while a very religious state could be in the right.  The soviet Union occupying eastern Europe for example.

[SardonicSkeptic]

I think my sock drawer could beat you in a "debate." Also this isn't a debate, it's an argument. Even so I challenge you to cough up one lie in this video. It's not a lie just because it places you in a bad light. I know you have the ability just to reject reality, but please recognize to everyone else, that makes you look insane.

[redFISTofEUROPE]

Oh and btw. noones free speech has been offended. Kassie Dill has got backup accounts, she wasn't banned from the site or anything.

[atomicnumber86]

@redfistofeurope So? It was still a hindering her free speech. So what if she got back up accounts? It is still hindering her. Then those vids can be flagged, so eventually she must have a backup of a backup of a backup of a backup.

So actually flagging is fine by you?

When DPRjones got flagged and dmca'ed you also said, but DPR you got backup accounts? You were quite fine with c0ct0pus getting his regular accounts suspended?

Neither has been banned.

The moment she is not able to reach->

[atomicnumber86]

her regular subscriber base, she is being hindered in free speech.

Let me give you an example, say for instance you are able to speak in a hall, with a room for 500 people. Then someone drags you out to a backroom where you can talk to 21 people? Wouldn't this be against free speech?

The moment the video is removed, it is a violation of free speech. Keeping the man down is a form of censorship. If we do not allow people to speak at equally platforms, we are in fact performing censorship->

[atomicnumber86]

and that is not a good thing. Everybody should have an equal opportunity to say what they want. They just can't be expected to be taken seriously, like in this case kassie.

So here is a few questions: Was eimajun0s channel suspension rightful? Was it in fair order concerning free speech?

Should we allow people to falsely flag videos?

Would you call it a violation of free speech, if your channel got suspended tomorrow and you had to start all over, again?

Or is it only 'atheist' videos->

[atomicnumber86]

That falls into this category?

If so, what is the point of free speech?

Free speech isn't free if it is only one side allowed to speak.

[atomicnumber86]

Oh and BTW, I am mirroring the kassiedill video. She deserve just as much free speech as anyone else.

To my knowledge she hasn't DMCA'ed anyone. Neither has she flagged anyone.

[SardonicSkeptic]

Good for you man.

[SardonicSkeptic]

That's the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

[5b]

And? So your defense is "well she can make another account."? Really? You're going to go there? You have no principles at all.

I attacked your "points" head on and beat you.

You went so far as to say, "I don't have to debate you". Then strawmanned me. I pointed this out, and that's when you blocked me and deleted my posts on your vid. You're nothing more than a lieing asshat.

If Deryk is lieing so much in this video. Fucking prove it! Until then you're nothing but a child going "liar liar!".

[redFISTofEUROPE]

i think you've overlooked 2 things

1 i have dared you to make a video to me if you've got a disagreement with me and your excuse was "i don't have a camera" I CALL BULLSHIT btw. so i was fully willing to debate you, it was you who not just refused but instead continoued to troll

2 i don't know if you noticed but i already stated that deryk is a hopeless case. i'm not going to waste any more time on that little fanatic.

[atomicnumber86]

1: Whaat? To debate you, you must have a camera? Why?

Trolling is NOT writing only, GET IT? You can troll if you have a camera, GET IT?

You are not per default a troll, if you only use text, GET IT?

[5b]

1. Of course you'd dare someone to make a video. I don't post content because I CAN'T.

You can call "bullshit" all you want. Not everyone has a fucking camera dipshit.

Trolling is posting comments to incite a negative response. What I did was point out your blatant crap and failed logic.

2. No, all you're doing is running away because you can't back up your argument, or even make a new one.

He destroyed you. And what makes it worse, is he even left openings you could exploit.

You're running

[zydilak]

@redFaceofEurope. Insted of using a camara as an excuse, not to display your ignorence & incapability of logical thinking further. Then why do you not just debate him in comments? Could it be that the reason for this is: You have no arguments to defend Taleban or not killing the "wounded incergent"? Maybe? Otherwise please give your defence of these positions. Oh how stupid of me I do not have a camara. So you cannot debate me either. How could I think I could debate people without one...

[Espinozaize]

@FISTETinEUROPE was it the "THOUGHT POLICE!!" that made you take all your videos down hah? I mean so the world could not latch on to your brilliant explanation of how irationel hate is a-ok. Or was it the evil, evil transgender mafia who really whish to censure people like you: The militant socialist atheist who loves taliban & hates transgender people minority. Because it is not that you are a coward now is it?

[shadowmancer1488]

You look creepy without being covered in purple light.

[jordler]

stop droping frames why the hell is his video so laggy If your going to make a video get a working cam ..

[SardonicSkeptic]

@jordler You sure it's the cam? It says it's still being processed

[5b]

It's just him. The video was perfectly fine with me.

[libertymi]

Holy crap, you look just like Mark Corrigan from Peep Show..