Added: 4 years ago
From: patcondellTGAGroup
Views: 5,967
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The biggest questions known to Science are, "How did life begin and how did the universe come to be". Evolution Science proponents are no longer willing to position themselves by attempting to answer these two questions, they are clueless. The reason Evolution Scientist refuse to answer these two questions is because it is impossible to answer them without suggesting something beyond scientific understanding happened, something "Larger than Life like God".

  • Comment removed

  • Evolution Science caught in scam!

    The emails are now part of the public record, revealed in the report from the US House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform. The committee's staff investigation demonstrates that "Sternberg's civil and constitutional rights were violated": "In emails exchanged during August and September 2004, NMNH officials revealed their intent to use their government jobs to discriminate against scientists based on their outside activities regarding evolution.

  • I respect your right to believe in your religion of Darwinism. I respect your right to believe that you're related to a 3 foot Chimp named Lucy, I'll even fight for your right to believe in the "Magic of Spontaneous Transitions" as a desperate effort to explain why there are no transitional fossils showing cows evolving into whales etc., etc., but your religion should not be tax supported.

  • Here's a list of more than 700 Professors and Doctors from the most established Universities in the world who doubt Dawrinism.

    (dissentfromdarwin(dot)org) Thousands more would love to sign, when they no longer fear being "Expelled". See Ben Stein's Movie.

  • "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." ...Charles Darwin.

  • I am absolutely dying to see this flick!! Thank you Ben Stein for taking up this issue and giving us a voice that can finally be heard loud and clear in a public forum you truly are a man of character and intelligence, we are so tired of being ridiculed for questioning little lord Fauntleroy and his troupe of religophobic bigots whom stagnate our voice at every turn!! Finally, someone in Hollywood that will make a movie other than than another "brokeback mountain" God bless you Ben!

  • But Richard Dawkins is saying the moon landing was a hoax, is this based on "peer review"? I thought he was a scientist, where is his facts? Or is this another bogus assumption? Is Dawkins a conspiracy theorist or a scientist? If he is a Scientist, let's see the peer reviews, if there are no peer reviews then this proves that undesirable theories are EXPELLED from peer reviews! Is he guilty of spreading religious philosophy called Moon Hoaxism. Or is the "Peer Review" bias?

  • The lack of dust found on the moon landing photos is scientific proof that the moon is very young. Please try to explain that one!

  • Yes and I am sure you too will find evidence that it crashed into earth and landed in the perfect spot to control our tides in the most perfect way, Duh? ''By Chance''

    So many things you people like to explain is by Random Chance, It Must Be A MIRACLE.

    Truth is, your regular patronizing phrase of Answering your critics

    is, 'you think ''God Did It'' They do say The most obvious answer, 'is right under your nose?

  • Big difference between "Micro" Evolution & "Macro" Evolution, we see Micro Evolution happening all the time between species of their own kind, Nobody has ever seen Macro Evolution (such as species that magically change from a cow to a whale) accept those

    who believe in the Darwinian Cult. What's that saying? "A hoax so preposterous that it requires an intellect to believe in it".

  • ATTENTION ALL DEBATE CAPTAIN'S of EVOLUTIONISM

    It is essential that we "The Evolution Army" a.k.a. "Evo-tards" must not let any opposing view point appear to get the better us on any debate, remember Ben Stein's Movie is expected to indecently expose us for the scientific charlatans that we really are, therefore baffle them with as much BS as possible! We must preserve our Religion at all costs! Prepare 2 excuses for every 1 question! (Hiel Hitler!)

  • *shakes head* It's not about denying any god... it's about the inescapable fact that ID is *not* scientific. It's not testable, it doesn't yield any predictions, there are no practical applications. One can't simply scream "science, science, science" until one is blue in the face and expect the world to nod in agreement. Sorry.

  • it caught my eye lol im gonna go watch it .. is that the same guy twho did the old clear eye commercials

  • the overwhelming majority of people in this world are not Christians, and the overwhelming majority of people in this world do NOT believe in DARWINISM. but i'm sick and tired of hearing the Darwinian's accuse everybody who opposes evolutionary theology as being nut case Christian's, every Christian I've ever talked to describes their belief system as being a faith based religion full of healthy values like the 10 Commandments, i may not be one but i'll defend anyone with good values!

  • That's because the only modern country where Darwinism is opposed is America, which is overwhelmingly Christian. Saudi Arabia might be just as hostile to Darwinism, but Darwinists have to take other people's word for it because there's hardly any Darwinists there.

  • Comment removed

  • read "Bones of Contention" by Dr. Marvin Lubenow. Marvin took X-rays of all the original skeletal evidence. other medical professionals have collaborated that the earlier man used his teeth as a tool like the Ausi-Abo's and as a result of more muscular activity it causes bones to grow bigger, but instead of "Darwinian Evo-tard Monopoly" presenting both opinions of differing scientific opinions they only present the evidence that supports their agenda, about everything, eh?

  • There is no viable, ALTERNATE, testable scientific hypothesis that describes the existence of man on this planet and fits the data as well as evolutionary theory does. Furthermore, there is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE for anything like creation, intelligent design, aliens, spontaneous generation, sasquatch, or the Loch Ness monster.

  • No, Because it is based of Faith, no belief means no faith, live like an Animal?

    Let us not say, this is not the point, Faithless people are the biggest danger to society, the latest US shooting proves it, and that is merely scratching the surface time and Time again.

    There is absolutely no Scientific evidence of Evolution, Just a Mans theory?

  • The lastest US shooting was done by a troubled man who was severely indoctrinated into fundamentalist Christianity. What this has to do with evolution I can't fathom, but I'm sure you'll dazzle me with your Ray Comfort-like logic and explain it to me.

  • 'The lastest US shooting was done by a troubled man who was severely indoctrinated into fundamentalist Christianity'

    please give sources not just accusations. because the only place I've ever seen that happen is in the movies

  • No he that does truly believe, does not kill,

    Yes He that follows false teachings and murders is a believer of nothing, such as the false gods of roman empire, thus Atheist, no matter what evidence is brought forward in his history.

  • Can someone please tell me what the hell darwinism is? I know what evolutionary theory is, but this mysterious and elusive cult worship of Darwin, I hear so much about it.

  • THIS IS INCREDIBLE!!

    IT'S ABOUT TIME!!!!!!!

    I'm so sick of sitting in classes having professors teaching me a THEORY on something that has never even come close to being proved! Hey people... here's the other side... the side you've never heard!

    YEAHHH!

  • Peer review is denied because ID is supernatural by nature and can not be published in scientific journals because scientific means not being supernatural, therefore NO Itellegent Design articles are ever published (aside from ridicule), and regardless if you are aware of this or not, that is the rule!

  • My conclussion is that Macro Evolution is a state sponsored religion based on LIES. Do you have the courage to intelligently investigate the controversy from converted scientists who explain why the theory of evolution is a lie? I use to be similar to you, now I have changed sides based on facts not religion. Research "Dr. Hovind" for starters on youtube, watch "The dangers of Evolution", study the subject thoroughly, you'll understand that you've been conned.

  • I am not into Dr Hovind, to me he is just another salesman using religion. Though some of the points do make sense, science always finds a bit of gibberish to say otherwise? it has been proved time and time again, rock layers are a complete false account in the chronology of time, but yet science tell us nothing, it is that such ignorance that, never trust a mere man to a Higher Intelligent s.

  • Claim CD101:

    The geological column is a fiction, existing on paper only. The entire geological column does not exist anywhere on the earth.

    Response: 1. The existence of the entire column at one spot is irrelevant. All of the parts of the geological column exist in many places, and there is more than enough overlap that the full column can be reconstructed from those parts.

  • It's an old Soviet Union trick, If anyone in the USSR thought that Darwinism was any less creditable than Creation then regardless of there academic standing they were not permitted to graduate high school or go on to University, then the Doctors and Professors could say "Why doesn't any High school or University graduates believe in Creation.

  • Hey Patcondell, what's TGA Group? And do you believe that there may be some kind of afterlife? Do you think that it is important for you to try to determine for yourself if it may exist? I think Hovind's playing it safe and finds there is less lies in the Bible than there is in man's science. Do you think that everything you read in your school textbooks is the truth? Thanks, Ms. Latosi

  • If there is not something there, then believe me not only on just one occasion, I should be a dead man, but for some kind of intervention, that moved me to safety away from most certain disaster, once or twice could be called coincidence, this was not. unless psychic power to predict the future in a space of a few minutes or a minute? The only people to believe in every thing they read from school textbooks will have to be evolutionist, because let us not forget, that is all they teach?

  • Hitler's main religion "philosophy" was Darwinian Evolution. He hated Christian's and wrote that Christianity is the most fatally sadistic hoax ever perpetrated against humanity. I have study Darwin's book, Hitler's 1924 bio, and the scientific assumptions that back Evolution as scientific fact, I have also reviewed the writings of dozens of scientist that use to be evolutionist that now say it's not science.

  • Goodwin's law + Strawman.

  • There are NO feasible arguments for creationism

  • There are NO feasible arguments for evolution

  • except thousands upon thousands of peer reviewed research

  • There is no conflict between religion and the Theory of Evolution. Nothing in the Theory of Evolution states that it is incompatible with the belief in a creator. The idea that the belief in God and the Theory of Evolution are incompatible has been manufactured. Intelligent Design is simply not a theory because it doesn't predict anything and is not falsifiable. You don't have to be a non-Christian to disagree with the "theory" of ID.

  • This is awesome!

  • Ben Stein isn't using Clear Eyes. The little box he refers to that scientists are keeping science in is called reality, and can be characterized as intellectually honest, falsifiable, testable, observable, and free of free of political influences.

  • Bull, it is politically influenced, why do you think they get away with all they do?

    Also they have used religion to front there causes, with the political Bishops, who just like the Pope are In word one way Indeed another...

  • It is also fact, that there are so many

    intellectually honest, feesable, testable, observable information that throws evolution way way off course, so you state there is no little box? It is just like the political Bishops, it is not about real religion, It is about POSITION.

  • Intelligent design is obviously just creationist bullshit.

  • Evolution without a single thread of proof is most certainly bullshite,

    What is worse is the one who thinks he/she is intelligent that accepts something that is proven that just does not work and still believe in it?

  • But really, I totally agree with you. These creationists ought to be thankful that science can't address God, because if it did, it would have disproven "him" a long time ago. :)

  • Yes, it's a conspiracy. And every natural history museum, every university bio department in the entire world, is in on it. Thank you for showing us all how bonkers you are.

  • Scientists accept the theory of pansdermia (life was seeded by aliens eons ago) before they admit the complexity of a single cell of an amoeba, containing enough DNA code to fill a thousand Encyclopedias, before they allow creationism. Please read I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist by Norman L. Geisler and Frank Turek -- it's really, quite fascinating if you're a Christian and will make you question your beliefs if you're an atheist, an agnostic, or just plain indifferent.

  • 150 years ago, everyone was a creationist. Instead of complaining, Darwin and other evolutionists continued to research, to experiment, to publish articles, until at last their views became the overwhelming consensus of the scientific community. But that's just too much work for these creationists, so instead of doing research they go straight to the schoolboards and try to get their BS taught to kids before anyone in science accepts them.

  • If you understood evolution, you wouldn't point to the complexity of a single cell as if it were evidence against it. No evolutionary biologists suggests that a single cell is supposed to be simple. By the time anything as complex as a cell arose, the history of life on earth was already 2/3 over.

  • Major, Major, Major Movie!!! I can't wait till it comes out!!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more