Added: 4 years ago
From: darksss
Views: 30,328
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (141)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is still terribly slow and u even cheated 2 u r a FAIL

  • You sir, are a fibber. First your 4x4 cube had three centers complete already, purple, red and yellow. Yes I watched it very closely. Noticed that BEFORE you started to actually solve it. Lucky scramble? eh likely not. Especially since, your 5x5 white and yellow center (which are conveniently opposite) are complete as well. You actually have a better chance of getting hit by lightning than having that lucky of scrambles. Which also make me question your 3x3 and 2x2 solve.

  • The easyest one is by far the 3by3 and i can solve the 7by7 in 1 min

  • ha, i think someone got a little head start on three of those cubes(:

  • Even if I read them I couldn't do it, congrats!!!

  • yeah I noticed that you did't do the 4x4 algorithms off the top of you head before I read your description.

  • 2 centre on the 5x5 was already solved

  • Or, I can be wrong and this was all real. Haha

  • I know how to sovle a up to a 5x5, and the 2x2 was just a joke it already had 3 white pieces in the correct place(but if that was a scramble from cubetimer or something then its legit, but I highly doubt that), and the 4x4 already had the pink center pieces in the right place, and the 5x5 already had ALL THE YELLOW CENTER PIECES in the correct place. So, what I'm trying to say here is that either he did this on purpose because you can't just accidentally get a cube to be mixed up that badly.

  • i can't

  • what he checks the algorithm for the 4x4

    cheap

  • I'll stick to Sudoku. Can you say Carpal Tunnel Syndrome >.>?

  • Rare in speedcubers. With the proper grip, it will never happen.

  • The 2x2 is pointless.

  • have you ever tried it?

  • not really a hard puzzle

  • so i thik its harder than you think.

    i thought before getting mine that i can easily average 6 seconds and i needed 11.

    but now with some practice i finally came to 8.4 sec. and im not content with this result.

  • I say pointless, as it will not take that long to solve it. Even 1 minute isnt long, puzzles are designed to exercise the brain and pass the time while solving it.

  • I highly doubt you can solve a 3x3x3

  • i can

  • I like solving 2x2 then 3x3. you can't knock the 2x2 because some can solve it faster.

  • the 2x2 isnt pointless, i.m.o. its kinda the same as a 3x3 just no middle layer, everything else is the same algorithms.

  • woow... awesomE!

  • from 1:10 to 1:30 he was kinda triped and he stopped

  • I've never seen a 5x5

  • there's even a 7 by 7 now.

  • cool i didnt even know there was a 6x6 (or isnt there one?)

  • there is and they rock

  • after you mod them :P

  • that was kinda slow

  • Yu Nakajima can do this in sub 3 minutes

  • i cant even solve a 3x3 in that time

    ur awsome :)

  • Well, now you can solve one in about 3 minutes

  • omg!!! i cant even solve a 3x3 cube!!!

    ur sooo awesome!!

    and ohh yeaa. my friendis sitting here trying to solve a 3x3 and shes hopeless.

    u need to hepl herr.

  • i loved the 4x4x4 parity algorithms, their just fun.

    too bad mine shattered and fell apart like sand. it was just TOO smooth, eastsheen cubes are nice but my 3x3x3 sucked balls =[

  • what method do u use for the 3x3?

  • i am just rubik's illerite to do shit like this. i bow down to you

  • wow like none are actual rubik's brand, doesnt matter i guess

  • Or they could be the really old ones without the logo. :P

  • there eastsheens

  • that gave my a head

  • damn ur good!!!!!

  • u guys r all nerds

  • shut the fuck up dude. You have no life to come here and say that. I bet you live with your mom and your a 50 year old virgin.

  • he used the book to figure out a parity case that arises on two flipped edge pieces on opposite sides

  • what was the book for during the 4x4. otherwise its really cool. but why would people sit in their house and solve puzzles all day.

  • nice you solved the 4x4 in like a few minutes...it took me 2 hours to solve my 4x4

  • Insaneeee

  • Wow!!!

  • i do think my fren can do beta

  • let me see you do it

  • Wow yuo watched the parity algorythms...I do the same

  • eastsheen is the shit

  • Beast-like solving meng!

  • dude your such a beast

  • Man those parity algorithms are nasty...I would hate to have to memorize all of them! Good job. I still haven't got around to getting a 5x5. And whats up with these people telling you to get a life?? At least we use our brains for something useful and not going around youtube watching videos we think are stupid? Anyways good work man.

  • interesting use of the word 'useful'. Good skills all the same.

  • you don´t have to learn all the algos, i just learned 2, the oll one that turns one edge pair around ant the one that switches edges from back to front, you can do the other ones with y-perm and t-perm

  • cool

  • and to think I thought I had too much time on my hands...

  • Ebay.

  • check A local Barns & Noble Thats were I got mine.

  • you cheated with the parity on 4x4 =0

  • i can only do so far the 3x3 and the rubiks snake im gonna get 4x4 and a 5x5 for my birthday and maybe buy a 2x2 on the way

  • 2x2's are easy

    just like the 3x3s but u dont have to worry about the edge peices (the ones that arnt corners)

  • all eastsheens?

  • get a life

  • do you think that I should get an eastsheen?

  • nice. but lols yu should lern algs by heart.

    nice tho, chekk my vids pls

  • who cares about parity it's only 15 moves to rmb better than all the PLL and OLL algs u have to learn for 3x3, so just use ur brain and memorize it

  • i know it took me a long time to remember all those algrithums and what did you say

  • thats pretty sweet i got a 4x4 and 5x5 for christmas, i can solve the 4x4 but can anyone explain edge pairing in a simple way for the 5x5????

  • It's the same as a 4x4

  • haha!lol..we have exactly the same case!=)

  • u dont need algorithms for 4x4...

    u can pair edges in a special way to avoid parity

  • actually, parity is determined during solving the centers

  • but it would be faster if you just put them in and do the parity algs if you put them in where you dont get parity it takses alot longer

  • how do u prevent parity?

    i didnt kno u could do that, is it complicated?

  • why dont you remember the algorithm for that parity it is easy and you dont have to solve it that far to find out you have it

  • I think someone purchased the 2x2 + 4x4 + 5x5 Eastsheen package!! ;P Haha me too. Nice vid.

  • man i think u r readin the moves. And if ur not..... u shud work on doin the 4x4 faster

  • talented

  • did u lubricate ur 5x5 and if u did could u tell me how thaks because i have an eastsheen too

  • Brilliant!

    I can do a 3x3x3...

    bought 4x4x4 and thought i'd be smart..use the 3x3x3 algorythms..how wrong iw as ¬_¬

    i can't read the book on the 4x4x4 to complex for me..any one or do you know any where a GOOD teutorial is?

    brilliant solves :)

  • i can solve it but i smashed a part and i havent done it in a while so now i forgot the algorithyms to solve parity D:

  • I spy a few Eastsheens.

  • sorry buddy i meant to put the thumbs down on koolaidsmex

  • I can only solve a 3x3 and a 4x4. Nice Job and Vid :)

  • nice... i shud totally try do it too, but i'm still a beginner making all those cubes

  • if you think he doesnt have a social life then why the fuck are you watching his video??at least he can do it, not like u, you moron piece of shit...by the way nice vid darksss...

  • fuck i cant resolve the 2x2 ehehhe

  • you use fridrich for the 3x3 right?

  • good job.

    i can only solve a 3x3...learning a 4x4 though

  • pretty radical

  • wow now i know how to solve 3x3 XD

  • Where can you go to learn how to solve a 3x3 rubix cube? You were really great.

  • k ijo puta n?

  • ....algorithims???

  • cube steps

  • wow...amazing...and i was thinking hellraiser also

  • Awsome. Personally, I can't even do the 2x2. :(

  • whoever disses this sick mother fucker is fucking wrong because theyrwe jelous u rule keep doing it and look out for that 10x10 one ;)

  • Mayn...5x5 O_O The 3x3 made me sick so I can't even imagine that one.

    Gratz buddy!

  • I think that is really cool. I personally can't do any of them...

  • the 2x2 is so awesome!

  • WOW

    you must have ALOT of free time

  • good skill!

    just by looking at the cubes make me sleepy already..lol

  • I think that this is rally impressive! But, better watch out maybe Pinhead from hellraiser will come out and get'cha (LOLOL)If you haven't seen it, it's about a demonic cube that has a gateway to hell and is a doorway for demons to come to earth if the cube is 'toyed' right. Talented bro, good job though.

  • LOL he turns the page. So subtle there.

  • idk about that 2x2...it took you like 10 seconds, and it should be harder than the 3x3

  • it cracked me up when he turned the page. that was tight tho.

  • he turns the page haha xD

  • wats the book for anyway

  • at 3:30 he turns a page, ................ NOOB

  • lol dilone = stupid. nice job.

  • ok people go to like 4min in and you clearly see that this man fast forward this film b/c clearly a personcan not move that fast or finish all them that fast

  • haha this is actaully a terrible solve for me way back long time ago when I did this

    so your wrong about that

  • who said you cant move that fast? once you find what your moving there is a motion to getting it back quickly.

  • You need to get your facts right, look at the speed of the light blinking on the timer, them fast forward a little bit and look at the speed of the light again, STILL the same, so stfu and gtfo noob

  • that cant be healthy

  • are those cubesmith stickers?

  • u got skillz... u should do a tutorial for them.

  • Can you post a clear tutorial on how 2 solve the edges of the 5x5x5 rubix cube? i'm stuck and i don't want to mess up the center pieces.

  • thats awesome!

  • it was good even though on the 4x4 and 5x5 you started with one center solved on both, besides that im impressed

  • i hate parity, it sucks, the algorithms are really long

  • I loveeee the fact that 2x2 and 3x3 takes less than a minute to solve. Then you get the 4x4x4 and 5x5x5 and it takes a while. Good job.

  • lol u use a paper with the parity algorithms i used to do that

  • hah yeah... I dont feel like memorizing.

    If I want to memorize one, ill memorize 3x3 LL stuff

  • Damg!!!! Thosse are spme quick hands

  • Dang look at the cube master! I only got up to 4x4...need to get a 5x5!

  • wird finger tricks for 3x3, that last algorithm for 3x3 wasent the fridrich one was it?

    lol ur 5x5 time is better then mine....

  • wow if u actually timed ur 2x2 solve that would have been like world record

  • haha.. i got a super lucky case, i skipped like everything... weird

  • it was like 8 seconds. I average around 6 on the 2x2x2, best average is 4.68

  • you got two wrong sides on 5x5

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more