@matthew1722 LSD isn't for fags, it's for everyone to enjoy, except for the ignorant people. And @chrenBOPavich it's not "better" than this, it's just different.
I saw this demonstration about 50 years ago in Junior High School in a film called "Gateways to The Mind" featuring Dr. Frank Baxter.
Excerpts of this film can be found here on YouTube, but I haven't found the clip of this demo as seen on the film. They put some spooky music to it to make it seem all the more mystical.
I'm not sure I'm seeing it properly. The only unusual thing I could see was the dowel in the middle rotating through the window, but even then I can't be sure that it's not just seeming to rotate through and actually just swiveling back and forrth.
Ok, after watching it a second time my visual perception adjusted and I can see the actual dimension and follow the rotation of the window. Interesting trick.
If you made a child watch stuff like this and the Ames room and other illusions throughout childhood, I bet a spinning rectangle would confuse them greatly.
@GarlicPepper no, it's all in your brain. the brain tries to transform that what your eyes see into something that makes sense..it just happens to fail :P
It took me a few seconds to start seeing the optical illusion. I just saw it as it actually is until I tried not to focus my attention on what I had already seen.
Took a few times. It makes more sense if you hide the stick part with your hand and watch it spin. The "AHAH" moment is when I discovered the "shadows" on the "frame" implied a thick window, but when it rotated to the side it was paper thin. Ontop of that, the "window" is not a rectangle, but instead bigger on one side. The point in which it "stops" is when it's directly facing the camera. Just try to "ignore" the shadows and the rotation makes sense!
Also note that this "trick" can only be done as a video. If you saw this with 3D vision (with your eyes, in person), your brain would be able to figure out the shape even with the shadows. But since this is a 2D video, your brain has to "make up" the 3rd dimension using visual cues (in this case, the shadows), which is what the artists uses to cause it to miscalculate.
It's pretty easy to make out when it's aligned with the camera angle. It looks to be more convex on one side and more concave on the other, and may have a slight textural variation as well. The shadows do give it away.
I didnt see it going both directions until i read someone say it was only going in 1 direction... wierd.. now i can see it either way i want.. strange
killerofhell1: NO FAKE! Try look at it at distance in small video and u see that it real.. but with full screen and sclose look its f- amazing!!! cool cool cool
...er... the film? The film is brilliant. My brain hurts.
From what I bothered to read about the comments about an apostrophe that have overtaken, I surmise thus: it makes no dfference if a name ends with S. For example, it would be James's coat or Claus's house.
The James family. The Brown family.
The Jameses. The Browns.
James and his giant peach would be James's peach. Or Jim's peach. Otherwise, it's like saying Jim peach or Jim coat. It's Jim's coat. And so on. It's easy, really...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The correct spelling is always "Ames's"; unfortunately, the Christians fucked it up with their "Jesus'", which is totally incorrect. It should be written "Jesus's".
Actually, there is no firm rule. All that matters is consistency. In his book Elements of Style William Strunk recommends adding the possessive modifier, rather than merely an apostrophe as you suggest, to nouns and proper nouns ending in an "s" where the result is not overly clumsy or awkward. To assert that there is a rule and that this must "technically" be spelled one way or other is ill-informed.
@lingwitt: I was responding to ottawatechy's comment, where he said, "You don't use the trailing s if the word ends with s. Thus it would technically be Ames' or Jesus'."
@lingwitt (again): I just realized that I couldn't see your comment because of its rating. In fact, I wholly agree with you that the best spelling is Ames's, although I disagree that the rule is firm. Also, there are notable exceptions, such as Mr. Chamberlains's, where the result is simply awkward.
@krupple Sorry, you're wrong. I appreciate it's your name and everything but James' would only be right if you were referring to more than one object, for example a family of people called James. A good way of remembering it is "The director's car is parked in the directors' car park"
Apostrophe usage with proper names ending in "s" goes with pronunciation. You'd say "this is Jameses book" not "this is James book", so the correct spelling is James's
No, I'm not wrong. Wikipedia: "A widely accepted practice is to follow whichever spoken form is judged better: the boss's shoes, Mrs Jones' hat (or Mrs Jones's hat, if that spoken form is preferred)". Fowler: "Add 's to names that end in s when you would pronounce them with an extra s in speech".
If the person who produces this video intends to leave us confused despite the description, he's done a good job.
If he really wanted to show how an Ames window works so people can understand it clearly, all he needed to do was move the camera around to show it from different angles as it rotates.
The window rotates entirely with the stick in it, the window itself is just scaled in a bizarre way that gives it the illusion of rotating backward half the time.
Ok, hands down, by far the most bizarre thing I've seen this year... How the?... nah, where's the point in asking... It wouldn't be as cool if I knew the cool things that are to know about it...
mind fucked!!
krokodayl 3 months ago
I can make it spin both ways!
blahblahblahblah5511 6 months ago
Defied reality again, huh?
ErichoTTA 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What has been seen cannot be...GAH!
Arbiter567 10 months ago
if you just focus enough you will see that it spins clockwise and that the pipe does the same
sanvincent666 10 months ago
HOW......................................
yinyangcali 10 months ago
i need to mop my brain off the keyboard
ZZJohnDyerZZ 1 year ago
Someone call the police, My brain was just raped.
manbearpig900 1 year ago
After watching this for 10 minutes, I finally beat my brain and actually saw the true movement. It's really hard but really rewarding.
pimpdadyhasker 1 year ago
@pimpdadyhasker you didn't beat your brain, your brain beat the illusion.
marmar3291 1 week ago
It's quite astounding really.
mrsanMan 1 year ago
Fucking shit. This thing messed up my head
AmaraKoreda 1 year ago 3
Hint about what`s heppening here:
That window is moving only in 1 direction!
7895431243 1 year ago
@7895431243 you can kindof see it with the shadow
alan850627 1 year ago
can some one tell me were to get one or how to make one
snwboarderdd 1 year ago
omg ive been loling uncontrollably for almost a minute now. i am so building one asap
derman077 1 year ago
I'm amazed that people come up with brain tricks like this
Knowwon249 1 year ago
LSD is way better than this, you should all just drop acid.
chrenBOPavich 1 year ago 2
@chrenBOPavich LSD is for fags. You must be some sort of fag.
matthew1722 1 year ago
@matthew1722 LSD isn't for fags, it's for everyone to enjoy, except for the ignorant people. And @chrenBOPavich it's not "better" than this, it's just different.
didinultien 1 year ago
@didinultien My comment was purely sarcastic. I was messing with @chrenBOPavich.
matthew1722 1 year ago
@chrenBOPavich kkid
ventHARAS 1 year ago
That made my brain get confused and stuff.
abdishtar 1 year ago
This is another brain fuck just like that acid melting ur brain hollow face illusion. Enough to give a peaceful brain nightmares! ;D
Sogwa 1 year ago
I had to hit the replay button like three times to actually see the dimension and follow the rotation of the object.
dinmagic 1 year ago
Took me a few seconds but I'm finally able to see what's really going on.
Philkid3 1 year ago
I saw this demonstration about 50 years ago in Junior High School in a film called "Gateways to The Mind" featuring Dr. Frank Baxter.
Excerpts of this film can be found here on YouTube, but I haven't found the clip of this demo as seen on the film. They put some spooky music to it to make it seem all the more mystical.
powertube5671 1 year ago
my eyes r fucked up O_o lol XD
lpenrike 1 year ago 4
This video makes me slightly nauseous.
visceralchemistry 2 years ago
@visceralchemistry
Me too l think.
Sogwa 1 year ago
this guy has a great explanation and the guy who came up with this is a genius
cradlerock19 2 years ago 2
(( (()) (()) ][_!
anko8aug 2 years ago
I have to fight my brain to see this for what it actually is. And even then I still see it reverse directions sometimes x.x
I love this illusion!
Kurairu 2 years ago 5
I'm not sure I'm seeing it properly. The only unusual thing I could see was the dowel in the middle rotating through the window, but even then I can't be sure that it's not just seeming to rotate through and actually just swiveling back and forrth.
PenguinJockey13 2 years ago
Ok, after watching it a second time my visual perception adjusted and I can see the actual dimension and follow the rotation of the window. Interesting trick.
PenguinJockey13 2 years ago
I can't believe this video was stolen by Liquid Generation and they put a screamer in it!
Stephen9233 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
i sort of want to throw up now...
nanaki2007 2 years ago
woah
5L1M5H4DE 2 years ago
Did it died?
Killdozer6006 2 years ago
head fuck maan...
DARKnDODGY 2 years ago
Uhmmm...I'm actually a visual kind of person, I would have appreciated if you moved your camera and showed us how it worked.
idioticscheme666 2 years ago
He explains it clearly. It's not a rectangular window. It's angled. Look closely. COOL!!!
lulupaloozatv 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I say it FAKE
MaikUniversum 2 years ago
are you usually this retarded?
TheCheezWizz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you still beating your mom ?
MaikUniversum 2 years ago
Thanks for confirming my suspicions.
TheCheezWizz 2 years ago
Cheers.
MaikUniversum 2 years ago
Да, пришлось поломать глаза, пока сообразила, как это работает, но всё же стереотипы были сломлены, УРА!
KrasnickayaM 2 years ago
If you made a child watch stuff like this and the Ames room and other illusions throughout childhood, I bet a spinning rectangle would confuse them greatly.
This is awesome.
Sully800 2 years ago
Da Fuck?
Maxxorz12 2 years ago
I <3 my brain
cl0ckt0wer 2 years ago
i was momentarily confused.
still am actually. WOW.
thinkinghurtzzz 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This looks photoshopped.
tdawgmark3 2 years ago
did my eyes die?
GarlicPepper 2 years ago 34
@GarlicPepper no, it's all in your brain. the brain tries to transform that what your eyes see into something that makes sense..it just happens to fail :P
didinultien 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Photoshop
Sebhelyesfarku 2 years ago
Wtf? I'm ready to kill myself....no-emo.
MyNameISBenOrme 2 years ago 2
My brain has no idea what I just watched.
luchamini 2 years ago 76
This has been flagged as spam show
@luchamini
HA HA HA
Sogwa 1 year ago
Seen this a long time ago.. but it's still trippy
404040wolf 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
noob
RTZSecret 2 years ago
It took me a few seconds to start seeing the optical illusion. I just saw it as it actually is until I tried not to focus my attention on what I had already seen.
TheThomaswastaken 2 years ago
Took a few times. It makes more sense if you hide the stick part with your hand and watch it spin. The "AHAH" moment is when I discovered the "shadows" on the "frame" implied a thick window, but when it rotated to the side it was paper thin. Ontop of that, the "window" is not a rectangle, but instead bigger on one side. The point in which it "stops" is when it's directly facing the camera. Just try to "ignore" the shadows and the rotation makes sense!
essial 2 years ago
Also note that this "trick" can only be done as a video. If you saw this with 3D vision (with your eyes, in person), your brain would be able to figure out the shape even with the shadows. But since this is a 2D video, your brain has to "make up" the 3rd dimension using visual cues (in this case, the shadows), which is what the artists uses to cause it to miscalculate.
essial 2 years ago
This optical illusion was originally created in 1951. It looks the same in person as on the screen.
noidsh 2 years ago 3
I shat bricks.
iforgotaboutit 2 years ago 5
It's pretty easy to make out when it's aligned with the camera angle. It looks to be more convex on one side and more concave on the other, and may have a slight textural variation as well. The shadows do give it away.
Jethelred 2 years ago
watch the shadow and the base of the object it helps you to understand it better.
it's just an optical illusion based on the dimensions and scaling of the window.
gregcarson 2 years ago
my brain almost shitted itself because of this.
darkshdwstlkr 2 years ago 2
Oh god, i just accidentally my brain..
Britzy 2 years ago 4
All of it?!
SinfulElation 2 years ago
That is INSANE.
dibtio 2 years ago
Holy Christ
I
What D:
ArcCollie 2 years ago
My head just exploded trying to make sense of this.
Klebsiella33 2 years ago 5
wow that's creepy
genius D:
zerohtense 2 years ago 2
Wtf? o.o
ellamoosem 2 years ago
wow even though i cant understand his explanations
i stumbled dis btw
alien8ted1 2 years ago
I don't understand what I just watched ...
wollam11 2 years ago
remarkable
Dannywills666 2 years ago
my head hurts xD
Ashecroft7 2 years ago
noob
xoranneke 2 years ago
I accidentally your comment
Ashecroft7 2 years ago
WTF what just F*****g happened
roadkillskate 2 years ago 2
Man thats hard to look at.
AwesomelyAwsome 2 years ago
niceeee ....
19aalbertpereramw 2 years ago
helps understanding it if you know its always spinning in the same direction and not alternating like it seems to be
freshlyshowered 2 years ago
I didnt see it going both directions until i read someone say it was only going in 1 direction... wierd.. now i can see it either way i want.. strange
Adeptmind 2 years ago
That happened to me.
D8
Synius44 2 years ago
Si... bueno, un lado es más grande que el otro.
Shorosky 2 years ago
i cant work out wtf is happening there :O
elliotuk999 2 years ago
killerofhell1: NO FAKE! Try look at it at distance in small video and u see that it real.. but with full screen and sclose look its f- amazing!!! cool cool cool
tibnok 2 years ago
lol its now real its made by computer, its sooo easy
killerofhell1 2 years ago
Insane. I can't tell what's going on.
jleack 2 years ago
omg
weikath9 2 years ago
dude, this is just Wow
FonkayMonkay66 2 years ago
this gave me nausea...
amazing tho, going to try and make one :)
nodnodwinkwinkV 2 years ago
How does that work? i'm confuzzled!!
Orangeflava 2 years ago
don full get it
sjg2 2 years ago
Wow
jazltalz 2 years ago
i fucking love how the guy talks ,,, the professor who used to give us physics courses in college used to talk like that,,,,
hamzeeco 2 years ago
oh i get it
tutshorties 2 years ago
sweet
WuvableKel 2 years ago
i think my brain explodededed
nic0dem8D 2 years ago 2
god....they could've atleast taken the camera and given us a top-down view to help us understand better
But yeah, it's remarkable.
edaciousforit 2 years ago
Why is everyone talking about posessive nouns?
NamelessGiraffe 2 years ago 2
cuz of the title
myfaceispurple 2 years ago
James: singular non-posessive.
James'/James's (through common use): singular posessive.
Jameses: plural.
Director's: singular posessive.
Directors: plural.
Directors': plural posessive.
experttease 2 years ago
whoa!
raghu22 2 years ago
...er... the film? The film is brilliant. My brain hurts.
From what I bothered to read about the comments about an apostrophe that have overtaken, I surmise thus: it makes no dfference if a name ends with S. For example, it would be James's coat or Claus's house.
The James family. The Brown family.
The Jameses. The Browns.
James and his giant peach would be James's peach. Or Jim's peach. Otherwise, it's like saying Jim peach or Jim coat. It's Jim's coat. And so on. It's easy, really...
lucypop861 2 years ago
Thanks, QI Elves.
popkkskall 2 years ago 2
Excellent.
EBursey 2 years ago
I accidentally my brain.
istarnor 2 years ago 8
great internet catchphrase. very funny. 5
hatfactory 2 years ago
My mind comprehended it.
EGomezPatrol 2 years ago
FFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
soliloqvi 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
sure makes my dick hard
anandanaga999 2 years ago
Zomg WTH
hvyhitter 2 years ago
We need an instructable... I want one.
lllAnonlll 2 years ago
Sorry, I'm one of the older generation and don't understand the nuances of modern colloquiolisms. Is "sucks dick" good or bad?
fugbo 2 years ago 6
The comment that this comment is a reply to has been tagged LOL ROFL LMAO LOLLERCOPTER LOLOCAUST.
Thank you, you made my evening brighter.
johnkeye 2 years ago
@ fugbo
thats pretty bad.
dilan728 2 years ago
wtfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
jakswa 2 years ago
Ah, the reddit grammar nazis are here
bwoark 2 years ago 2
Halt! Grammarzeit!
IRUSIGreenChief 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is no spoon
bigstretchy08 2 years ago
Theres my stick,sorry Mr. Ames.
reject2007 2 years ago 2
my head asplode
sh1verr 2 years ago 5
Brilliant.
Gavither 2 years ago 2
I see it!
bfrankey 2 years ago
What the fuck!?
My brain.
SarahxJane 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The correct spelling is always "Ames's"; unfortunately, the Christians fucked it up with their "Jesus'", which is totally incorrect. It should be written "Jesus's".
lingwitt 2 years ago
You don't use the trailing s if the word ends with s. Thus it would technically be Ames' or Jesus'.
ottawatechy 2 years ago
Actually, there is no firm rule. All that matters is consistency. In his book Elements of Style William Strunk recommends adding the possessive modifier, rather than merely an apostrophe as you suggest, to nouns and proper nouns ending in an "s" where the result is not overly clumsy or awkward. To assert that there is a rule and that this must "technically" be spelled one way or other is ill-informed.
nachtbrand 2 years ago 5
I think you misread? I did recommended adding the possessive modifier, rather than merely an apostrophe.
Also, I assert that my rule is proper and that people who don't follow it are stupid and ugly.
lingwitt 2 years ago
@lingwitt: I was responding to ottawatechy's comment, where he said, "You don't use the trailing s if the word ends with s. Thus it would technically be Ames' or Jesus'."
nachtbrand 2 years ago
@lingwitt (again): I just realized that I couldn't see your comment because of its rating. In fact, I wholly agree with you that the best spelling is Ames's, although I disagree that the rule is firm. Also, there are notable exceptions, such as Mr. Chamberlains's, where the result is simply awkward.
nachtbrand 2 years ago 3
My name is James and if I want to put an apostrophe at the end, the correct way to type it is James' not James's
krupple 2 years ago 2
@krupple Sorry, you're wrong. I appreciate it's your name and everything but James' would only be right if you were referring to more than one object, for example a family of people called James. A good way of remembering it is "The director's car is parked in the directors' car park"
soundbyter1234567890 2 years ago
Apostrophe usage with proper names ending in "s" goes with pronunciation. You'd say "this is Jameses book" not "this is James book", so the correct spelling is James's
sfocata 2 years ago
you're completely wrong. Any noun ending in 's' to which a possessive apostrophe is applied negates the use of a second 's'
tomwitcomb 2 years ago
Sorry - that's not true. Sometimes when a possessive apostrophe is added a second 's' is added to indicate how it is usually said. :)
sirox2007 2 years ago
stop arguing, google and see! YOU are wrong tomwitcomb ;)
mawgen 2 years ago
No, I'm not wrong. Wikipedia: "A widely accepted practice is to follow whichever spoken form is judged better: the boss's shoes, Mrs Jones' hat (or Mrs Jones's hat, if that spoken form is preferred)". Fowler: "Add 's to names that end in s when you would pronounce them with an extra s in speech".
sfocata 2 years ago
No, my love. You are not Jesus and you are not from the classics.
Niiauyr 2 years ago
However, I personally don't find "Mr. Chamberlains's" to be awkward.
lingwitt 2 years ago
If the person who produces this video intends to leave us confused despite the description, he's done a good job.
If he really wanted to show how an Ames window works so people can understand it clearly, all he needed to do was move the camera around to show it from different angles as it rotates.
trippedbreaker 2 years ago
why does my brain fail me? !!!!
sbmillionair 2 years ago 2
Brain rape
spookypen 2 years ago 7
lol @ brain rape.
definitely.
evreniz 2 years ago
my brain just died, too bad i'm not even at school yet D:
halogirl916 2 years ago
theres hundreds if tricks like that, all of them equally trippy
Reminds me of a realllllllly old Bill Nye video of something similar
Tenetri 2 years ago 2
It's not that hard to comprehend if you just let your brain override your perception.
This is a great example of our brain perceiving reality while our senses cannot. It proves there is more to reality then we are seeing.
Neuroelectronic 2 years ago
NEVER DIVIDE BY ZERO!
njkita11 2 years ago 3
He says it in the video, right? One side is much broader than the other side, it fucks up the perspective...
Not that I can fully comprehend it.... in fact, I still don't get it at all
freefall88 2 years ago
NEVER DIVIDE BY ZERO
Jimdapredator2 2 years ago 3
that is fucking awesome
amnesiai 2 years ago
uhhhhhh
is the answer melon?
cowluver979 2 years ago
my brain it BURNSSS!!! how...?
magicguy5 2 years ago
Ahh! The window... Doesn't rotate entirely!
The stick... Moves through the window?
BRAIN NO WORKY.
loneroad 2 years ago 6
The window rotates entirely with the stick in it, the window itself is just scaled in a bizarre way that gives it the illusion of rotating backward half the time.
hamstaman 2 years ago
Wait... But... How the?
Ok, hands down, by far the most bizarre thing I've seen this year... How the?... nah, where's the point in asking... It wouldn't be as cool if I knew the cool things that are to know about it...
Maturkus 2 years ago
i think my brain just imploded
raptor17d 2 years ago 3
can they show us other angles of the illusion to show the true shape of it?
awsome illusion though
jmac530 2 years ago
there's one in mexico city,,
i looked for an hour,,
systemofaramo293 2 years ago
fucden crazy
member353 2 years ago
Unfortunately... I don't understand. But apparently it's a very cool thing.
JamesLimborg 2 years ago
That was a confusing experience.
Fastzombie42 2 years ago
that's kewl.
ilovegoth 2 years ago
I am fooled again! Darn it!! :)
mlade77 2 years ago
thats awesome
hotbunz1614 2 years ago
Sweet
TheKahael 2 years ago