There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by all scientists.
1. The energy for evolution comes from the sun.
2. Darwin wrote 'Origin of Species' Not Origin of Matter.
3. They know what happens .000000000000000000000000001 seconds after the big bang.
@gregrutz You may BELIEVE this but a friend of mine, who I have spoken with, is a former professor of evolutionary biology who now speaks out against the fairy tale of Darwinism, so NOT all scientists toe the secular line; there is not a single example of how any species came to life or changed into a different creature and raw energy from the sun causes Darwinism? LOL. The Big Dud is running into more and more hurdles.
Do you fail to realize how every single one of the arguments that you think so boldly destroys the Big Bang is applicable to your own religion? If you dismiss the Big Bang because you think it's based on unobservable phenomena, then you must dismiss your god as well. If you ask for absolute one hundred percent proof of the Big Bang before believing it, then you must require the same for your god. Yet you, like most other Christians, have a double standard when it comes to this line of reasoning.
@Aralithe - Really?? So Christians are teaching our beliefs as if they were "science" in public schools and textbooks? Like Secularists and Darwinists do? Sorry but your comparison is absurd to the highest degree.
@CreationMinistries 1. Yes, Christians are trying to get their beliefs taught in schools, under the guise of things like Intelligent Design. Even that aside, you fail to recognize my point. You claim to need proof for things like Big Bang or evolution, yet don't require the same for your god.
2. Much as you may not like to admit it, the science you are trying to refute has been empirically proven time and time again. So we have earned the right to teach it in schools; you haven't.
1] ID is not a Christian movement. Everyone other than materialistic atheists agree with ID. Hindus, new agers, even those that think aliens dropped us off agree with ID, attributing it to their diety.
2] Either you're joking or need therapy. Darwinism is the biggest hoax in the history of the world
@CreationMinistries 1. Yeah, everyone except, you know, the conservative, George-Bush-appointed judge who ruled the teaching of ID no different than the teaching of religious creationism. Regardless of who else agrees with ID, the experts who actually matter don't, and the movement was primarily Christian.
2. Fossil record; biological, genetic, and every other tree of life match; natural selection; observed speciation; the list of evidence for evolution goes on and on. What's yours for creation?
@Aralithe 1] less Kool-Aid might help you. 2] The fossil record; biological & genetic complexity, the lack of fossils to support any upward 'tree of life.' natural selection; observed speciation only within the same kinds; the list of evidence for biblical creation goes on and on
@CreationMinistries 1. Wow. Ad hominems. Is that what this has come to? I suppose Godwin's Law is only a hair's breadth away. Admit it: ID is a mostly Christian fueled movement that was knocked down by the type of judge most likely to permit it. It's not science.
2. Even if every point you just said were true, all it does is disprove evolution. It doesn't prove any creation. To think that it does is just creating a false dilemma between evolution and creation that simply doesn't exist.
well that is an interesting point then isnt it. What i am wondering though is if it was emitted from every star, that includes our sun, then wouldnt there be a a greater level of this radiation in the direction of our sun, once again i am no astrophysicist.
professor, professor...is this really the best Darwinist professors have to offer?
Why don't you supply us with the single best proof you are aware of showing that Darwinism has ever occurred - I suggest that you will not because you know I will shoot it down for everyone to see - prove me wrong
I have to think there is a mental block with Darwinists. You guys keep alluding to the "wealth of evidence" supporting Darwinism but when pushed to do so you provide NO EVIDENCE. Put forth one such viable proof and show me to be wrong because I say you have nothing - except name calling
Okay, the fact there are clear gradations of morphological change between very different kinds of organism within the fossil record. Such as between reptiles and mammals.
What evidence do you provide? A bible? Or do you have anything a little more...say..modern or peer reviewed?
The fossil record is a total embarrasment to Darwinists. claim to the contrary are buster and bluff Again, no evidences - I think everyone can see the pattern by now I do not need to 'prove" the bible right . What I do is show folks that secular teachings, which undermine peoples faith, are not based on any true scienctific facts but rather on misguided secular interpretations of evidences
professor, The fact that you put so much time into me and my teachings tells me how fragile your position truly is You have promised to reveal how totally wrong I am but so far all you do (with your 5 or 6 messages to me per day) is provide cheap insults. I would expect this from an immature 12 year old but please.... I consider you the absolute best that the secular crowd has to offer so put up your promised proof and stop wasting my time
When a professor builds an accredited college course specializing in attacking me and what I teach yet refuses to show me what he is teaching and refuses to allow me to answer. his attacks....using the term "cowardly" is siimply being honest
I understand he is trying to stand up for his religious beliefs and I respect that....but doing it in a university setting without allowing the other side to defend itself?
People reading this can decide for themselves what they would call it
All my teachings are open to the public and all 14 times I have spoken at NAU I have allowed an open Q&A to follow
I am always open to honest critique
Had you approached me I would have welcomed your help but you have never had any intention of offering constructive criticism, only in defending your philosophical foundataion
Again, I respect your dedication to defending your religious faith and look forward to seeing your "mountain of evidence" for Darwinian-style evolution
Sure - please remind me next Fall . You dishonestly promote your class as being open-minded but I got several emails such as this one from students: Russ, I am an NAU student and in a class "Science and Creationism." It was advertised to be neutral. All I can say is it is far from being neutral. It is very anti-bible and anyone in this class without a strong relationship with Jesus Christ will be misled which is the professor's goal. He is sarcastic at best toward Christians...
I am not going to post more of your rantings & name calling
Yet to be more than fair I will post & respond to your 1 best proof for the religious beliefs of Darwinism or the BB
Please do not call names or curse or I will not post it
I await to see your best proof since we all have the exact same evidence to observe & interpretations depend on which worldview we look at the data through
You have not identified yourself but you remind me of a cowardly professor at Northern Arizona University who attacks my teachings without allowing me to answer his assertions.
Will you at least let me know when and where these are posted?
If you will then I look forward to you helping me to straighten out any errors in my presentations and I look forward to assisting you with the errors that will be in your videos
Quote-mining is a term used to convey that things are taken out of context. Your use is blantantly dishonest as the article was written by scientists opposed to the Big Bang theory in order to show that there is much opposition toward the BB
Most folks who adamantly defend the BB do so because their religious belief or lifestyle is based upon ridding the biblical God from their mind.
Despite the Secular bias undermining science today more & more research says the BB is just a Big Dud
1a] I show the article is written by scientists opposed to the BB I do not hide or mislead anyone about this FACT
1b] I am showing how kids are misled by false data in the textbooks- you say what is in the text I show is wrong - not representing mainstream science - PROVING MY POINT - so complain to the publishers and the dishonest professors who use it
2] This proves what I am saying - science takes a back seat to secular, anti-biblical dogma
Russ, don't you think it's a little dishonest to quote mine an anthropology text as a representation of modern cosmology??? Why not read an actual cosmology text?!
One doesn't have to know anything about science to make videos about them. Creationists think that any stupid thing they say is true without having done any real homework on the issue.
The entire phrase is dumb. There is a staggering array of evidence for evolution. It's freely available on the web and in science books. But you guys won't do any honest homework. Just continue scoffing - it's easier to be smug when you don't know anything than it is to consult science texts.
Through our past 5 video postings I have shown 50 frauds taken directly from high school and college textbooks. Again, the response of the Darwinian faithful is name calling with no examples of where I am wrong.
And as always, no examples of the "staggering evidence" of Darwinism in action. You guys are boring me.
Why don't you just admit that you don't know what you're talking about?
Your entire video is nonsense. Just because you cite a text book doesn't mean the book is wrong - and even if the book is wrong, it doesn't mean you're right.
I'm sure that feedback from people with a background in actual science is terribly boring to you. Nothing surprising there.
A letter signed by dozens of scientists in New Scientist 5-04 & included: The big bang can boast no predictions that have been validated by observation. Claimed successes consist of making observations fit by adding adjustable parameters. The big bang relies on a growing number of never observed entities—inflation, dark matter, dark energy and cant survive without these fudge factors. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical factors be accepted
"you guys believe we evolved from a rock". Well you guys believe we were created from dirt. And to be honest scientists do not believe we evolved from rocks.
I agree that honest scientists know there is no way life spontaneously generated itself from non-life. Yet false science is teaching nothing blew up, a big rock formed (earth) it rained on the rock and life spontaneously generated itself. This goes against the Law of Biogenesis, the laws of Thermodynamics, all mathematical probability, all scientific observations, all common sense and logic . Yet it is taught in public schools and colleges, underminig real scientific education and research
You misunderstand science and what it is teaching. This is not what scientists say, and you know it. This is purely creationist propaganda, or creationist ignorance. This is dishonest, and this dishonesty is the real problem.
You are mixing up actual science with what is taught in Humanistic controlled textbooks (the clip is from our Facts vs Darwinism in the Textbooks) Everything I discuss is taken DIRECTLY from texts - I even SHOW the page. For you to claim I am dishonest is hard to fathom when I SHOW what the books says You are correct - what is being taught IS NOT science. Such frauds have undermined scientific education & research - all in the name of promoting the religious philosophy of Naturalism.
Again, you are confusing what you read in texts, and the facts. I went to school, and was not ever taught the foolishness that you claim is being taught, and I can not find anyone who has. I again point you to frauds in the bible. Noahs ark which is scientifically inaccurate, and wrong, but you seem to ignore these points. And you also do not approve these comments. Which is dishonest. I suspect those who approve comments are afraid of something. Profanity yes, but a good argument. Cowardly.
Sorry if I am: "confusing what you read in the texts, and the facts." LOL
Let's get the Humanistic frauds out of the texts and teach real science Why is that a problem for you?
I get 30 comments a day from people such as you I do not owe you a second of my time or posting/answering anything you send
Again I offer If you have ONE piece of evidence of Darwinism having taken place then present it . Otherwise all readers can assume you have nothing except cheap insults and name calling
I like the way that the quotes he uses from the college textbook contains many ellipsis (...) . I wonder what they chose to leave out in the quotes. Kinda dishonest to not give entire quotes.
The entire book would not fit into a presentation which is why we give the book title and the page number so anyone can see the entire context should they choose.
As always, name calling is the last bastion for those with no evidence to back up their religious beliefs.
I don't need faith to BELIEVE evolution happened.
All science is secular.
''came to life '' is Abiogenesis not evolution.
There are many examples of species changing.
The second law of thermodynaic is not violated by evolution, the sun is where earth gets it energy dummy.
The Big Bang theory is not the theory of evolution, sorry if you can't prove evolution wrong.
gregrutz 1 year ago
][ \ @gregrutz Per your statements:
-you need close-minded religious fervor
-yes it is biased
-Proving Darwinism couldn't start
-yes kinds bring forth after their kind as the Bible says
-The 2nd Law is the most accepted law in all science-except biology- as it refutes Darwinism
-The Law of Gravity is not Darwinism either - I guess you have a point there
-Open minded folks can view my 50 Facts vs Darwinism in the Textbooks
CreationMinistries 1 year ago
There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny!
It is the backbone of Biology, accepted by all scientists.
1. The energy for evolution comes from the sun.
2. Darwin wrote 'Origin of Species' Not Origin of Matter.
3. They know what happens .000000000000000000000000001 seconds after the big bang.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz You may BELIEVE this but a friend of mine, who I have spoken with, is a former professor of evolutionary biology who now speaks out against the fairy tale of Darwinism, so NOT all scientists toe the secular line; there is not a single example of how any species came to life or changed into a different creature and raw energy from the sun causes Darwinism? LOL. The Big Dud is running into more and more hurdles.
My advice is you lay off the Kool-aid
CreationMinistries 1 year ago
Do you fail to realize how every single one of the arguments that you think so boldly destroys the Big Bang is applicable to your own religion? If you dismiss the Big Bang because you think it's based on unobservable phenomena, then you must dismiss your god as well. If you ask for absolute one hundred percent proof of the Big Bang before believing it, then you must require the same for your god. Yet you, like most other Christians, have a double standard when it comes to this line of reasoning.
Aralithe 1 year ago
@Aralithe - Really?? So Christians are teaching our beliefs as if they were "science" in public schools and textbooks? Like Secularists and Darwinists do? Sorry but your comparison is absurd to the highest degree.
CreationMinistries 1 year ago
@CreationMinistries 1. Yes, Christians are trying to get their beliefs taught in schools, under the guise of things like Intelligent Design. Even that aside, you fail to recognize my point. You claim to need proof for things like Big Bang or evolution, yet don't require the same for your god.
2. Much as you may not like to admit it, the science you are trying to refute has been empirically proven time and time again. So we have earned the right to teach it in schools; you haven't.
Aralithe 1 year ago
@Aralithe to your points above:
1] ID is not a Christian movement. Everyone other than materialistic atheists agree with ID. Hindus, new agers, even those that think aliens dropped us off agree with ID, attributing it to their diety.
2] Either you're joking or need therapy. Darwinism is the biggest hoax in the history of the world
CreationMinistries 1 year ago
@CreationMinistries 1. Yeah, everyone except, you know, the conservative, George-Bush-appointed judge who ruled the teaching of ID no different than the teaching of religious creationism. Regardless of who else agrees with ID, the experts who actually matter don't, and the movement was primarily Christian.
2. Fossil record; biological, genetic, and every other tree of life match; natural selection; observed speciation; the list of evidence for evolution goes on and on. What's yours for creation?
Aralithe 1 year ago
@Aralithe 1] less Kool-Aid might help you. 2] The fossil record; biological & genetic complexity, the lack of fossils to support any upward 'tree of life.' natural selection; observed speciation only within the same kinds; the list of evidence for biblical creation goes on and on
CreationMinistries 1 year ago
@CreationMinistries 1. Wow. Ad hominems. Is that what this has come to? I suppose Godwin's Law is only a hair's breadth away. Admit it: ID is a mostly Christian fueled movement that was knocked down by the type of judge most likely to permit it. It's not science.
2. Even if every point you just said were true, all it does is disprove evolution. It doesn't prove any creation. To think that it does is just creating a false dilemma between evolution and creation that simply doesn't exist.
Aralithe 1 year ago
I started this vid, skipped 0:31 and saw this guy in a with a cross in front.
Someone tell me why I should watch this video and why I should believe some guy who clearly doesn't look like he has a brain.
yjvnz 2 years ago
"i suspect the stars are the source of the mbr"
i wasnt aware he was an astrophysicist.
hoyohoyohoyow 2 years ago
With astrophysicists reporting that all stars emit mbr, why would you think that a person must be an astrophysicist in order to figure that out?
This is one of the many problems with an education system that teaches students what to think as opposed to teaching them how to think
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
well that is an interesting point then isnt it. What i am wondering though is if it was emitted from every star, that includes our sun, then wouldnt there be a a greater level of this radiation in the direction of our sun, once again i am no astrophysicist.
hoyohoyohoyow 2 years ago
Good question - I haven't heard - you would need to ask a scientist who actually conducts such studies.
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
i suppose my thinking is that then the readings would be much more intense when pointed at the sun, or is there something wrong with that
hoyohoyohoyow 2 years ago
This is good stuff, cant wait to watch the rest!
thecleanpig 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
professor, professor...is this really the best Darwinist professors have to offer?
Why don't you supply us with the single best proof you are aware of showing that Darwinism has ever occurred - I suggest that you will not because you know I will shoot it down for everyone to see - prove me wrong
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Amusingly hypocritical how some people criticise the wealth of evidence in support of evolution only to quote the bible in response.
lonerook860 2 years ago
I have to think there is a mental block with Darwinists. You guys keep alluding to the "wealth of evidence" supporting Darwinism but when pushed to do so you provide NO EVIDENCE. Put forth one such viable proof and show me to be wrong because I say you have nothing - except name calling
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Okay, the fact there are clear gradations of morphological change between very different kinds of organism within the fossil record. Such as between reptiles and mammals.
What evidence do you provide? A bible? Or do you have anything a little more...say..modern or peer reviewed?
lonerook860 2 years ago
The fossil record is a total embarrasment to Darwinists. claim to the contrary are buster and bluff Again, no evidences - I think everyone can see the pattern by now I do not need to 'prove" the bible right . What I do is show folks that secular teachings, which undermine peoples faith, are not based on any true scienctific facts but rather on misguided secular interpretations of evidences
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
professor, The fact that you put so much time into me and my teachings tells me how fragile your position truly is You have promised to reveal how totally wrong I am but so far all you do (with your 5 or 6 messages to me per day) is provide cheap insults. I would expect this from an immature 12 year old but please.... I consider you the absolute best that the secular crowd has to offer so put up your promised proof and stop wasting my time
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
When a professor builds an accredited college course specializing in attacking me and what I teach yet refuses to show me what he is teaching and refuses to allow me to answer. his attacks....using the term "cowardly" is siimply being honest
I understand he is trying to stand up for his religious beliefs and I respect that....but doing it in a university setting without allowing the other side to defend itself?
People reading this can decide for themselves what they would call it
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
All my teachings are open to the public and all 14 times I have spoken at NAU I have allowed an open Q&A to follow
I am always open to honest critique
Had you approached me I would have welcomed your help but you have never had any intention of offering constructive criticism, only in defending your philosophical foundataion
Again, I respect your dedication to defending your religious faith and look forward to seeing your "mountain of evidence" for Darwinian-style evolution
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
Sure - please remind me next Fall
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Sure - please remind me next Fall . You dishonestly promote your class as being open-minded but I got several emails such as this one from students: Russ, I am an NAU student and in a class "Science and Creationism." It was advertised to be neutral. All I can say is it is far from being neutral. It is very anti-bible and anyone in this class without a strong relationship with Jesus Christ will be misled which is the professor's goal. He is sarcastic at best toward Christians...
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Thanks for catching the typo. I saw one in a comment of yours but saw no reason to make an issue of it. I think your reaction shows:
1] Name calling is the last bastion for those with no evidence to back up their postion; and
2] I have allowed you to waste my time - a situation I will now correct
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
To Malranch (who keeps contacting me)
I am not going to post more of your rantings & name calling
Yet to be more than fair I will post & respond to your 1 best proof for the religious beliefs of Darwinism or the BB
Please do not call names or curse or I will not post it
I await to see your best proof since we all have the exact same evidence to observe & interpretations depend on which worldview we look at the data through
Send it!
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
You have not identified yourself but you remind me of a cowardly professor at Northern Arizona University who attacks my teachings without allowing me to answer his assertions.
Will you at least let me know when and where these are posted?
If you will then I look forward to you helping me to straighten out any errors in my presentations and I look forward to assisting you with the errors that will be in your videos
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
Quote-mining is a term used to convey that things are taken out of context. Your use is blantantly dishonest as the article was written by scientists opposed to the Big Bang theory in order to show that there is much opposition toward the BB
Most folks who adamantly defend the BB do so because their religious belief or lifestyle is based upon ridding the biblical God from their mind.
Despite the Secular bias undermining science today more & more research says the BB is just a Big Dud
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
The absurdity of this comment is stunning:
1a] I show the article is written by scientists opposed to the BB I do not hide or mislead anyone about this FACT
1b] I am showing how kids are misled by false data in the textbooks- you say what is in the text I show is wrong - not representing mainstream science - PROVING MY POINT - so complain to the publishers and the dishonest professors who use it
2] This proves what I am saying - science takes a back seat to secular, anti-biblical dogma
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Russ, don't you think it's a little dishonest to quote mine an anthropology text as a representation of modern cosmology??? Why not read an actual cosmology text?!
malranch 2 years ago
Let us see, I show a college science textbook to show lies being taught as if they were science and you think that is somehow dishonest?
What I show is right there in the textbook! Nothing dishonest in my statements. I can not say the same for your comment
If you want to be honest then take up your issue with the textbook authors, publishers and with the dishonest professors using it
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Comment removed
malranch 2 years ago
I suppose you are trying to make a point of someone taking something out of context ? The verse states:
"The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God."
Of course I can show you have taken this out of context, you can not do so with what I have said or shown
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Awesome presentation and so true!
freeindeed777 2 years ago
When 10th video is over, it seems like it continues onward ... will we be able to see the rest?
MajSmJz 2 years ago
One doesn't have to know anything about science to make videos about them. Creationists think that any stupid thing they say is true without having done any real homework on the issue.
TheFallibleFiend 2 years ago
Again, name calling with no examples of where I am wrong.
You guys are boring me.
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
"If Darwinian evolution is true..."
The entire phrase is dumb. There is a staggering array of evidence for evolution. It's freely available on the web and in science books. But you guys won't do any honest homework. Just continue scoffing - it's easier to be smug when you don't know anything than it is to consult science texts.
TheFallibleFiend 2 years ago
Through our past 5 video postings I have shown 50 frauds taken directly from high school and college textbooks. Again, the response of the Darwinian faithful is name calling with no examples of where I am wrong.
And as always, no examples of the "staggering evidence" of Darwinism in action. You guys are boring me.
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Why don't you just admit that you don't know what you're talking about?
Your entire video is nonsense. Just because you cite a text book doesn't mean the book is wrong - and even if the book is wrong, it doesn't mean you're right.
I'm sure that feedback from people with a background in actual science is terribly boring to you. Nothing surprising there.
TheFallibleFiend 2 years ago
A letter signed by dozens of scientists in New Scientist 5-04 & included: The big bang can boast no predictions that have been validated by observation. Claimed successes consist of making observations fit by adding adjustable parameters. The big bang relies on a growing number of never observed entities—inflation, dark matter, dark energy and cant survive without these fudge factors. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical factors be accepted
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
"you guys believe we evolved from a rock". Well you guys believe we were created from dirt. And to be honest scientists do not believe we evolved from rocks.
quedorf 2 years ago
I agree that honest scientists know there is no way life spontaneously generated itself from non-life. Yet false science is teaching nothing blew up, a big rock formed (earth) it rained on the rock and life spontaneously generated itself. This goes against the Law of Biogenesis, the laws of Thermodynamics, all mathematical probability, all scientific observations, all common sense and logic . Yet it is taught in public schools and colleges, underminig real scientific education and research
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
You misunderstand science and what it is teaching. This is not what scientists say, and you know it. This is purely creationist propaganda, or creationist ignorance. This is dishonest, and this dishonesty is the real problem.
quedorf 2 years ago
You are mixing up actual science with what is taught in Humanistic controlled textbooks (the clip is from our Facts vs Darwinism in the Textbooks) Everything I discuss is taken DIRECTLY from texts - I even SHOW the page. For you to claim I am dishonest is hard to fathom when I SHOW what the books says You are correct - what is being taught IS NOT science. Such frauds have undermined scientific education & research - all in the name of promoting the religious philosophy of Naturalism.
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
Again, you are confusing what you read in texts, and the facts. I went to school, and was not ever taught the foolishness that you claim is being taught, and I can not find anyone who has. I again point you to frauds in the bible. Noahs ark which is scientifically inaccurate, and wrong, but you seem to ignore these points. And you also do not approve these comments. Which is dishonest. I suspect those who approve comments are afraid of something. Profanity yes, but a good argument. Cowardly.
quedorf 2 years ago
Sorry if I am: "confusing what you read in the texts, and the facts." LOL
Let's get the Humanistic frauds out of the texts and teach real science Why is that a problem for you?
I get 30 comments a day from people such as you I do not owe you a second of my time or posting/answering anything you send
Again I offer If you have ONE piece of evidence of Darwinism having taken place then present it . Otherwise all readers can assume you have nothing except cheap insults and name calling
CreationMinistries 2 years ago
I like the way that the quotes he uses from the college textbook contains many ellipsis (...) . I wonder what they chose to leave out in the quotes. Kinda dishonest to not give entire quotes.
quedorf 2 years ago
The entire book would not fit into a presentation which is why we give the book title and the page number so anyone can see the entire context should they choose.
As always, name calling is the last bastion for those with no evidence to back up their religious beliefs.
CreationMinistries 2 years ago