Ron Paul's Newsletters, Barack Obama's Horrific Attacks On Freedom

[MrCacique1955]

Are you free ...??? i donot think so...what kind of freedom is when you go te take a flight and you get treaten as a crominal at the airport...and also the newest law for detaning witjout reason people any cuase for a long time........american please wake op before it is tolate...

[wassupdoc319]

@TheNaarwhaal fdr's policies prolonged the great depression. You can thank that huge debt to the democrat majority in congress during Reagan's second term. Reagan got us out if the freaking cold war. Capitalism has lifted more people out if oppression than any other form of government. Just compare east and west berlin after WWII. I don't oppose charity but greed sure feeds more mouths than it.

[JPizzle1122]

All of Ron Paul's personal issues are messed-up... but what's nice about him, is that he is actually the one guy who wouldn't govern based on his personal beliefs... he's a hardcore constitutionality libertarian. He governs based on what's in the US Constitution.

[PossumCuber]

The bill Obama signed was actually to prevent people from voting for Rick Perry, because we all know we don't want him to be able to imprison people.

[triggerhare]

If Hawaii is REALLY a US state, then I wanna see it's statehood documentation!

Google "Overthrow of the hawaiian monarchy". I thought you people had a grasp of humor, or you know, read a book once in a while.

[hehefromhere]

/watch?v=h0hpiwfM2qo&list

Watch it to know the truth about the newsletters!

[RootbrianRocksAgain]

That #NDAA bill is going to turn people's travel plans into living hell.

[EpicNinjaIsNinja]

i love blink-182 abd Green Day. not thats its a major component of this vid...

[EpicNinjaIsNinja]

I agree, the supreme court needs to challenge this law.

[xPLxKolojak55xPLx]

On the Topic of Ron Paul's Newsletters, If anyone has actually listened to anything he has ever said you'll find that he is the biggest supporter of individual liberty, he sees everyone as a individual rather than putting people into groups of blacks, whites, etc. So to call him a racist is rather uncalled-for. About the videos where he "apparently" said that he wrote the racist rants I'd urge everyone to actually watch the videos because he clearly states that he is writing about the economy.

[andrew7603]

@xPLxKolojak55xPLx The only people that think it's racist are the ultra racist black community and liberals who want to continue to leech off the American taxpayer. I agree 100% with Paul. America doesn't owe anyone shit. If you want it, work for it. America wasn't founded on giving anything to anyone. It should always be the best man for the job regardless of color. If people want to look at racist shit, they should look at Affirmative Action.

[bobwatters]

Ron Paul 2012!!!

[maeherme]

DRINKING WHILE TALKING ABOUT POLITICS! Oh, Zach, how I have missed this!

[jossi166]

You are rely one of my favorite youtube political commentator!

[kennyvandossche]

I'm a bit concerned about america's sudden hysteria about this NDAA. All this new bill does is implementing something that already existed, but now in your own jurisdiction. It's not like you didn't detain anybody indefinitely before, right? Guantanamo and all? That hypocrisy is worse than the bill itself in my opinion. unfortunately he chose to even it out by doing the same to us citizens in stead of stopping this indefinite detaining for everyone.

[swordmasterjoshua]

@kennyvandossche Guantanamo Bay is a prison designed to detain terrorists who are not only a threat to us, but the entire world. From what it sounds like, the bill could be applied to any random criminal living in the U.S.

[jeremyshaw]

8( Holy...fucking....shit. Man...and I thought Republicans and the Bush Presidents were bad! Good God! It's official - as far as I'm concerned both Republicans AND Democrats are the worst; horrible; shit choices! I've never liked either side but now I REALLY DON'T LIKE EITHER SIDE! This is the straw that broke the camels' back! I'm god damn proud to be independent and liberal. The donkey and the elephant SUCK! Two big fat middle fingers to both Republicans and Democrats for ruining the U.S.! ='(

[funnybuddydotcom]

In the end we have no rights. Everything we have and everything we are can be taken away tomorrow. No questions asked.

[funnybuddydotcom]

Vote Marvin E. Quasniki

[sarawesomeh]

I'm sorry, but I just really need to know what your shirt says.

[wassupdoc319]

@TheNaarwhaal liberal (left wing) politics call for the government to make more decisions for the people (communism socialism). How does conservatism seem intolerable? It turned America from a newly formed nation to the world's wealthiest in just a hundred years. Lets look at the most conservative presidents in American history, Washington, Monroe, Coolidge, Eisenhower, and Reagan. These also happen too be the most prosperous times in America.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@wassupdoc319 To a country that kills thousands in the middle east? Left wing politics calls for the decisions to be MADE BY THE PEOPLE. How can ever try and use Reagan as a positive reinforcement?? He is perhaps the worst, no - remembering Nixon - second worst President in America - a right wing crackjob.

[wassupdoc319]

@TheNaarwhaal America experienced an economic boost during the Reagan administration. Inflation went from 12.5% to 4.4% and unemployment went from 7.5% to 5.4%. And your calling him the worst president? Lets look at FDR, the unemployment rate under his administration averaged between 17% to 21% and never fell below 14%. FDR imposed the most government-run programs than any other president and weakened the consumer voice, REDUCING power of the individual. This is left wing politics.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@wassupdoc319 Of course, and I guess winning a war against a Fascist Regime and bringing a country out of depression count for nothing then? And of course, you ignore the massive debt Reagan left the country with, the mental institutions he closed down across the USA, his opposition to Unions, deregulation of the market and the bloody mental STAR WARS programme he proposed which brought the world closer to mutually assured destruction! Besides, it's people's choice not consumer choice!!

[TheNaarwhaal]

@wassupdoc319 Don't assume everything is centred around the market? What about social responsibility? What about our debt to those not as fortunate as ourselves? But, of course, you don't care as long as you can still make money!! That's capitalism for you - crushing others for your own selfish greed. And, yeah, how dare you slander Left Wing Politics when the largest Right Wing Administration of the last century was the Nazi Party??!

[Evan42881]

Right when I'm 18, I'm moving to France. Don't give a fuck if I don't speak their language, I'm leaving this fascist fuckfest.

[PatientxWhatsername]

@Evan42881 French is easy to learn. And you'll spend a lot of time reading by riverside and freaking out about small changes in government.

I suppose it's better than having to rage against incredible turn arounds like these.

Bonne chance, mon ami. :)

[97superlink]

Honestly we need the money more than they need the support 8-10 years is enough on the topic of elections all options suck

[shortymir]

Well i didn't expect "yes we can" to be followed by "impression American citizens without trial".

You got love hope and change don't ya.

[gdrewpowers]

So my choices are racism or a complete disregard to civil liberties... Fuck it, racism it is.

[619master4]

Awww damn soo if someone thinks im a terrorist thats it? no more me?

[dondestamario]

Why do you keep saying "Him". He did not wrote those letters.

[MichaelVaggieri]

@dondestamario But he read and signed them.

[wassupdoc319]

@thenaarwhaal its actually the exact opposite in america. Conservatism means to downsize govt, and let the people rule. Liberalism means to make govt bigger and to come up with an elite group if people to rule over all. European countries are all very liberal (except for germany).

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@wassupdoc319 exactly, however he is semi-correct. Republican Party and the Conservative party do push these things. So this shows that they are NOT the conservatives in political spectrum.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@wassupdoc319 Make an elite group of people rule over all? Your conceptions of liberalism are ridiculous. As a socialist, Conservatism (big 'c' or little) seems so intolerable. And no - it isn't the exact opposite! The Conservatives here believe in downsizing govt, to - only here it's called the 'big society'. Check your facts. Oh, and by European countries are all very liberal you mean an elite group of people rule? Ahem, what about the senate?

[wassupdoc319]

Glenn Beck has been right all along. I don't see why people hate him so much, he's for small government and civil rights.

[thecrispt3r4t0r]

Worst Change Ever. Somebody should impeach Obama. He has betrayed all of us.

[NinTheFolf]

Glen Beck would be right for once = Mind Blown.

[SilasCilice]

What font do you use? Yes, I know that's terribly off-topic but it's always been in the back of my mind.

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@SilasCilice Futura.

[ununhexium]

I wish everyone would stop spreading this lie that it doesn't apply to us. ACLU. Lawyers. Hello.

[ununhexium]

thank you, i love you. add: omg dandelion pillow :>

[RaybornButtercups]

I used to joke about Moving to Canada, but now that this law has PASSED, I am moving to Vancouver as soon as it is financial viable for me to do so. America no longer is worth living in, when we have no freedom.

Ohhhhh Caaaanaaaadaaaaa

[narfboy93]

Ron Paul giving murder tips. TV does a much better job at giving these tips and way overshadow what ever he might of said. That should be too much of an issue.

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

This video is full of incorrect "facts" against both Ron Paul AND Barak Obama. You present the Newsletters as factual representations of Ron Paul's opinion. Currently, there's no way to prove that. There is other things that are presented in the letters that don't aline with Ron Paul's presented views, such as gay's rights. As for Obama's criticism, try reading the NDAA. It clearly states that Americans are not involved by this. also read Non-Detention Act. It too is related.

[lovepotion39]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 But didn't it say the indefinite detention of suspected terrorists, including those obtained on American soil? That's the whole controversy behind this whole thing.

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@lovepotion39 Give me a specific place in the bill. There was a last minute amendment S.1867.ES Title X Subtitle D Section 1031 (e). SPECIFICALLY SAYS NO CITIZEN, LAWFUL ALIENS, OR PEOPLE ARRESTED IN THE BORDERS CAN BE AFFECTED BY THIS. Stop listening to what others say, and read it for yourself.

[lovepotion39]

I don't know about you guys but I am absolutely terrified.

[BlindMangoTV]

Hey, you actually make some sense for once! Congratulations on not being blind to one single party in this video! Well said stuff. (gee, I never thought I'd say that).

[TheSilentFool]

Is that a Chris Died for your Sins shirt?

[CalebO1996]

@TheSilentFool It is. Notice also his name on Twitter is Bill Sussman.

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@CalebO1996 Someone's paying attention!

[lesliefoundhergrail]

One take wonder. That, you are. 

[kingjulien86]

Fact: The NDAA contains an amendment saying indefinite detention doesn't apply to American citizens. Fact: A little known law, the Non-Detention Act (1971), specifically blocks indefinite detention of American citizens and was upheld by the Supreme Court about 6 years ago. Thus, even if the NDAA didn't have that amendment, the 1971 has precedence and American citizens still wouldn't be held indefinitely. Why is everyone ignoring the facts?

[avatarnaruto77]

Zac, politics have become so much clearer ever since I started watching you.

[tigolbiddies4D]

I knew there was a reason I stayed subscribed to you. Thank you.

[8daystillmonday]

Good video, man

[triggerhare]

He signed it in Hawaii, which isn't a state, it's an occupied territory. Therefore I say we toss it out as invalid!

[northwestsports]

@triggerhare uhhhhhh..... What?

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@triggerhare Hawaii is a state.

[ctraver]

@AngryFilmsProduction There are some decent arguments that the annexation of Hawaii was illegal even by the standards of the time. At the very least, there were some unethical dealings involved.

Their asking for and accepting statehood probably overcomes this, though the descendants of Hawaiis royal family could in theory challenge the annexation as illegal and the act of statehood, therefore, would be invald if the annexation challenge is succesful.

[andrew7603]

@AngryFilmsProduction Not if you ask the hawaiians. I had to sit through 3 anti statehood parades when I was stationed there. Hawaiians are fucking useless people.

[RFouts0]

@triggerhare On August 21, 1959 became the 50th state.

[TheRydog100]

@triggerhare stupid.motherfucker.

[TheMiglets]

@AngryFilmsProduction i love the political videos, but where's NCITW recently?

[rockandsockandrobot]

@TheMiglets Jory and I are shooting like ten episodes today. -Z

[OpheliaDagger]

This is all well and good but we need to remember that Obama once, beautifully, called Kanye a Jackass. You know, we've got to focus on the real issues at hand.

[hfe22]

@AngryFilmsProduction

It is worser than that! Obama is playing with a double face

/watch?feature=player_embedded­&v=jHaJrnlqCgo

So many republicans voted for it in the senate, you cannot believe it.

Greetings from Sweden from a non-american.

[TheNaarwhaal]

Isn't Ron Paul a Republican?? If he is, then COME ON HE'S A REPUBLICAN!!

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal problem with Politics. "HE'S TERRIBLE BECAUSE HE DOESN'T BELONG TO MY PARTY!!!" What ever happened to bi-partisanship? Oh yes, it died of with the stupidity of the American People.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 There's a difference between coalitions and coalitions with republicans. The Republican party stands in the way of civil and gay rights, freedom of speech and anti-imperialism. As a BRITISH PERSON, I have to live under the British Equivalent of the Republicans - the Conservative party - and I have to watch as, every day, they tear apart the country. My message of the day? Under the Republicans legislature like the NDAA would become a staple of every day life. Don't vote Republican!

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal I'm not planning to vote Republican. I plan to vote for WHAT I WANT. Ron Paul is a libertarian and a true conservative, in the true sense of the term. Someone who doesn't want to stand in the way of social NOR economic growth. Dr. Paul wants people to define their own sense of marriage, so he supports Gays. He pushes the constitution so he wants FOS. AND HE WANTS TO GET OUT OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS. NDAA was passed by 99 people of senate, so thats Repub and Demos alike.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 But by the majority of the American public? No. The NDAA is a blatant attack on human rights. We can see such similarities in the legislature passed in Germany in the '30's. We all know where that ended. The ridiculous "war on terror" is there just to discriminate an ethnic group and used as a power boost for the Blair and Bush administrations. The fact Obama's continuing with this crap is bleeding mental. And by "economic growth" you mean the free market that ripped society apart?

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal Give me FACTUAL evidence that the majority didn't want NDAA. Do you know what the NDAA even was? The annual budget bill for the Military. Sure, the wording was sketchy about detaining terrorist, but that was fixed by an amendment S.1867.ES Title X Subtitle D Section 1031 (e). Why do you point out the war on terror? I CLEARLY SAID DR. PAUL WANTS OUT OF IT. And yes, it is pretty mental for Obama to do that, he's the worst conse- oh wait he's a liberal. YOUR POINT IS MOOT.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 Give me factual evidence the majority of America did! And yes, I do know what it is, but the stuff about containing terrorists in it is mental. I bring up the war on terror because section 1021 and 1022 wouldn't even been put in if it wasn't for the so called "war on terror". Don't bring up two subjects (NDAA and Ron Paul) and then try and shut up about one of them. And you think this is in the usual line of Liberal thinking? Do you even understand Liberalism??

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal Evidence - It passed. Legislators are too scared of losing their cash cow of a job by going against their voters. I'll give you that the war on terror led to those sections, but it has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. I didn't bring up either of those, I responded to the video, you responded to my response, etc. And I'm STILL talking about both subject, I was asking why you bring that up when I'm clearly stating that what I support is along your views.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 Yet you support the NDAA? Don't even pretend to say you support something along my views. Don't even try. It was passed by the Senate but not by the entire population, nor was a national referendum passed. Fair point with the unrelated section. But to be fair, I posted the original reply. You replied to that.

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal When did I say that I supported the NDAA? No where. I CLARIFIED what it said. To be honest, I don't care about it. Its just another bill people are needlessly getting up in arms about without reading. It didn't just passed senate, that's not how our government works. I reply to what you said, not anything about the NDAA or war on terror. I responded by a disgusting view on a person just because what he is tagged as. That's called prejudice.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 Prejudice against the Republicans? Yup. I can live with that.

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal And when I said Liberalism, I was comparing it to your opinion on Conservatives. You generalize conservatism as being something thats not text book conservatism. Yet you take liberalism at the text book explanation. So I was saying that Barak is not a text book liberal, but he's a "liberal." I lean to the liberal side myself, however I don't condemn politician for their parties, I do for their views and how effective they will be. I try to be as bi-partisan as possible.

[TheNaarwhaal]

@N4K3DN1NJ4 Even when it's a party that systematically invaded countries to a) get oil or b) rage some hypothetical war with the USSR. I refer of course to Afghanistan, Iraq and Vietnam. I take Liberalism at how I perceive but how, in any way, do I generalize conservatism? I put down my views and defend them.

[N4K3DN1NJ4]

@TheNaarwhaal And my mistake on something, on the part of bringing up Ron Paul and NDAA. I thought that this was in response to a different comment I posted on this video. In this case, the one who brought up those subject was not the video. It was actually you. So I can't go back on something I didnt do.

[tadshackles]

Before he became the Americas-Funniest-Home-Video host of youtube, RWJ did a really entertaining and informative opinion driven political show... Zac is MUCH better.

Thanks Mr Little for doing these!

[SKTCSirDigby]

Glenn Beck = Batman. Got it.

[KirbyCrossing]

I wouldn't want Ron Paul as a relative.

[flabbywalrus]

Because he's the hero America deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A Glenn Beck.

[KirbyCrossing]

@flabbywalrus lol perfect

[TTEchidna]

We're all fucked.

[kazooga1234]

this is a super ha bisky vlog and for fun and impossible but what i would like to see happen for the last two standing would be a mccain vs obama and see who becomes president in 2012 just to see how it turns out

[Nerdylation]

Ron Paul also thinks the first Ten Amendments of the Constitution don't count if the State is screwing you over. considering all the states trying to fuck us already, maybe we should get a Real Rights Hawk rather than a Constitutionalist/"Libertarian­."

I think we're fucked no matter who wins in November, because Obama is advocating for one big fascist country vs Ron Paul advocating for 49 fascist states, maybe Hawaii just giving blow jobs on the beach. then there are the other Republicans,

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@Nerdylation We'll all move to Hawaii, then!

[nelsonwade2]

YOU BETTER GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT AND QUIT SAYING HE WROTE THEM!!!

YOU ARE A MORON!!!

HOLY SHIT IS RIGHT!!

YOU NEED TO DO SOME RESEARCH!!!

INFOWARS.COM

DRUDGE REPORT

WHY DONT YOU WATCH SOME RON PAUL VIDEOS AND QUIT SPOUTING THE INFORMATION THAT YOU HEAR FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND YOUR CLUELESS FRIENDS. YOU ARE REPEATING TALKING POINTS THAT ARE FALSE AND LIBELIST WHEN IT COMES TO RON PAUL!!

[kazooga1234]

@nelsonwade2 you are the one that need to do your research if ron paul becomes president you will die because he will get rid of the EPA and the FDA and those two things alone will probably kill you and if thats not bad enough he will have us go on the gold standered so that way you will starve to death and no income tax means no food stamps so you will definately strave to death and then he will kill your parents and grandparents by getting rid of the entitlement programs

[nelsonwade2]

@kazooga1234 FDA IS CORRUPT! EPA IS CORRUPT! THEY ARE BOUGHT OFF BY BIG CORPORATIONS. AGAIN YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!

DO YOU KNOW WHAT BPA IS? NO BECAUSE YOUR A MORON

DO YOU KNOW WHAT BIG AGRA IS? NO, BECAUSE YOU ARE A MORON?

DO YOU KNOW WHAT CHEMTRAILS ARE? NO?

RON PAUL WANTS TO TAKE THE CORRUPTION OUT OF THE GOVERNMENT!

I UNDERSTAND THAT YOU ARE SLOW AND YOU ARE A PRODUCT OF AN EDUCATION SYSTEM THAT NEVER TOUGHT YOU ABOUT HISTORY! COMMON SENSE!

[kazooga1234]

@nelsonwade2 (continue) i do know what BPA is and i know that the EPA wants to ban it its the president that wont listen to the EPA and without the EPA we will have even more BPA and more clothing chemicals that will turn males into females will be used and the EPA also wants to ban those but its because the president wont fix the EPA is why we have those problems without the EPA things will be so much worse and it shows that you dont know why the EPA was created

[nelsonwade2]

@kazooga1234 NDAA YOU DUMB BITCH



[AngryFilmsProduction]

@nelsonwade2 I think Ron Paul supporters on the Internet are GREAT, and I love that you guys are EVERYWHERE. But please channel this energy into voting, too. And maybe ease off the CAPS LOCK.

[GriffenMorivan]

My biggest problem remains to be that there has been a candidate this entire time who has all the positives of Ron Paul without the nutball caveats. Gary Johnson took New Mexico from a Deficit to a Surplus in a term where that was next to impossible. He doesn't take any of the backhandedly bigoted positions Paul does, like how Abortion should be legal (but it's evil, because babbies are alive at conception) Or Homosexuality is fine (but the faggots still can't call it marriage). Gary. Johnson.

[nelsonwade2]

@GriffenMorivan NDAA 

[GriffenMorivan]

@nelsonwade2 Thank you for saying absolutely nothing about what I commented on. Good work.

[Satirical24]

Side note: Obama is not in control of his own twitter account right now. His campaign has taken control until the election is over.

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@Satirical24 Obama is in control of his campaign though.

[JacobX89]

Glen Beck is the hero we need right now.

Fuck.

[Soupster011]

This is not strictly Obama, the bill had to pass through Congress too, and was about the only bipartisan thing Congress passed these last couple months. They all deserve the blame.

[sdjbass]

I'm disheartened that you'd latch onto ostensibly a single issue as your reason for supporting Ron Paul, Zac. Huntsman wants to end the wars and actually doesn't want to dismantle the government, and fuck up the economy and our foreign policy. I guess, really, you recognize that Paul will never be more than an also-ran so this vid is really just commentary about your frustrations with Obama, but learn a little more about how Paul's plan to balance the budget and I think you'll be disgusted.

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@sdjbass The other thing is that Huntsman is really no longer a serious candidate. But I have always liked him!

[WeAreThePiano]

He can already suspend habeaus (sp) corpus in wartime.

I do not agree with the law, at all. This should not have happened but in reality

this is nothing new.

Now I will go do research and arguing and possibly come back with a decently valid point (hopefully) for why in god's name he signed that damn bill.

[runnerh2]

@phox1515 Arnold wasn't born in America so sadly he cannot run for president and not like the birthers shit either this one's for real

[simplystatic]

thank you zac

[FunWithSexbad]

Zac, I think you might like to read this rather thorough explanation of why the NDAA is probably not as dangerous as you or I may have thought. reddit dot com/r/politics/comments/nt77r/­the_14_senators_who_voted_agai­nst_ndaa_all_the/c3brs66

Certainly, it's not a very nice sounding bill, but this guy appears to know his shit.

[mynameis677]

5:02 He'd make it about his own bigotry. It's almost never about the truth with him.

[phox1515]

Y'know it's funny... Obama is about as far from democrat as you get. Just like Arnold Schwarzenegger was about as far from republican as he could get. We need Arnold for president he did great things for california.

[thezachzachattack]

Thanks for this video, Zac. You always neatly put together my thoughts.

RSR any time soon?

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@thezachzachattack Maybe? I don't really have time to do the animation lately.

[intoxicated12gauge]

Only 14 senators voted against the NDAA. 6 were GOP. 6 were Dem and 1 was independent. At a time when congress couldn't be more in gridlock, tyranny is bipartisan... I take Paul at his word on the newsletters. Unlike most, "Paulbots" I completely understand why others don't. It looks really bad. Let's face it though, Obama renewed the patriot act, assassinated a US citizen over seas for speech crime, sent more troops to Afghanistan, and now this. Ron Paul 2012: because I like my rights.

[kingtafari9]

GO TO HELL zack !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[kazooga1234]

@kingtafari9 he is just telling the truth

[RKftw68]

oh... shit...

[MoMember88]

inb4 Massive shit storm for bad mouthing their messiah Ron Paul he didn't write most of the articles but he gave them the go ahead as the editor. My issues with RP are in social issues states rights do not trump a woman's right to choose pro life is not the Libertarian position specially with states already making abortions harder.

[Maphisto86]

Geez I am surprised at how lackluster the American masses are about those laws in NDAA. I mean when George W. finally left the White House people were out in the streets. When a bill like the 2012 NDAA is passed quietly, I didn't see the same reaction.

[Itachisasukekiller]

Well... We're screwed...

[Ramones1234100]

Zac, I am so glad to hear that you are behind Ron Paul. As you clearly know, the NDAA is CLEARLY unconstitutional. And Ron Paul is the man that wants to get this country back to those roots. Not sure where you're getting the newsletters argument but whatever.

[blah22322]

RIP Zach Little 1983-2012

"We're good."

Never forget.

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@blah22322 You made me four years too old there, I'm insulted!

[abcdefgwynn]

RON PAUL 2012!

[kazooga1234]

@abcdefgwynn you must have a death wish then because ron paul will kill you by getting rid of the EPA and FDA and if that doesnt kill you on its own then you will starve to death when he makes it so we are on the gold standered only and no food stamps because there will be no income tax and he will kill your parents and grandparents by getting rid of medicare medicaid and socail security and hes not for the constitutional right that allows ALL FEMALES to have an abortion

[M00k64]

You act like a Republican in the Oval Office would be MORE RESPONSIBLE than Barack Obama with the power the NDAA grants. I shudder at the possibility of Rick Perry having the ability to detain American citizens at will. Every homosexual would be thrown in Guantanamo Bay.

[ManfredvonKarma7]

@M00k64 If you feel that Zach is acting that way, then you're clearly mistaken. It seemed to me that his major concern wasn't with Obama having that power (not that that isn't in and of itself very concerning), but that he's made that power something that future presidents will have forever.

[M00k64]

@ManfredvonKarma7 I felt like his calling for Republicans like Glenn Beck to confront Obama was a way of saying that Republicans could be better trusted, though I may be mistaken. You are probably correct saying that his concern is more that every president will have that power,

[nelsonwade2]

@M00k64 NDAA!

[kazooga1234]

@nelsoni can prove what i am saying and just because the FDA and EPA are broken doesnt mean that it wouldnt be worse if they were gone i mean we dont have lakes on fire and thats what would happen if there wasnt a EPA and the only reason you have to know what medicines are compatable to other medicines is because of the FDA and the reason the side effects go so fast on the tv is because the FDA made it so you have to know all of the side effects of meds and that is just the loophole

[M00k64]

@nelsonwade2 I don't understand what you're trying to say...

[ManfredvonKarma7]

@M00k64 The call to the Republicans is more because they're the opposition party. They need to call Obama on this, or no one else will. Frankly, if the Republicans don't make the NDAA an issue then we're fucked because the Democrats certainly aren't going to come out against a president of their party.

[M00k64]

@ManfredvonKarma7 I feel like calling out Obama for signing the NDAA is a double-edged sword: If the Republicans make Obama look like the bad guy, He may lose the election. However this will call for whichever Republican nominee to repeal it, which is bad if the Republicans also want to use the NDAA. If the Republicans don't call out Obama, he will most likely win.

[ManfredvonKarma7]

@M00k64 The way I see it, the Republicans would gladly trade an possible uses of NDAA for the presidency.

[AngryFilmsProduction]

@M00k64 I wasn't saying Republicans could be better trusted, but I'm sick of the pro-Obama argument being that he's "not as bad." He was supposed to be like, good! So maybe we're wrong about Republicans, since we were so emphatically wrong about Obama.

[M00k64]

@AngryFilmsProduction The thing about the "pro-Obama" argument is that it's TRUE, for the most part. Ron Paul is a solid choice, but he doesn't have the same Republican support as Rick Perry or Mitt Romney. In the end, I'd rather have someone who is "not as bad" than someone who is "worse"

[daCrazi]

such truth!



[nyxsushi]

2012 has come we're all doomed this proves it. 0.o

[kazooga1234]

@nyxsushi not nessisarily a lot of people are doing a write in vote for alan grayson so hopefully that will help make it so it doesnt suck

[asdasasefasd]

@nyxsushi Damn, your name is violent and vulgar.

[derekd234]

Zach for president!

[lilmoefow]

...