The ROK Army soldier is equipped with a dual calibre weapon, while the US Army soldier still use the M4. Could it be, that South Korea is richer than the US ?
@kertaspaper94 We're a much smaller nation. By land-mass, in fact, the ROK measures smaller than most American states. That said, we're also a Global 20 export-driven economy. It's not so much that we're richer, but more that the costs we incur are much less than those of the U.S.
@sSector5 As Kim said (he misspelled your username), it's a drop stress test. Seeing if the rifle will still work if dropped. As any serviceman will tell you, reliability is one of the most important things to consider when grading a rifle on performance.
North have like 2.5 million troops ready to die first wave attack. Even u have latest weapon but no much ammo and men to use as good as useless in the battle field.
@glsblink Kindly research before you post. Yes, it is true that we have only somewhere around 25.6 million regular service personnel. Too large a regular military, as with the DPRK, and we would lose combat efficiency to logistics fuckups and simple lack of troop quality. Where we lack in numbers, however, we make up for in having some of the best-trained infantry, cavalry, and airmen in the world, equipped with some of the most-advanced military technology.
@glsblink Wrong figure, apologise: some 653,000 regulars and 3.2 million reservists (where I pulled the 25.6 million from, I have no clue). That blunder aside however, do mind that in addition to our national armed forces, we have the support of United States Forces Korea (USFK), lending us an additional approximate 30,000 personnel, also well-trained and well-equipped. Nevermind that NATO and the UN itself would also send armed support, as well as other allied nations.
@AbberantRender Don't forget that the ROK also has a vastly larger source of manpower to replace its losses, along with superior industrial capability, logistics and financial reserves. I also heard somewhere that the 653,000 figure is only 70% of the total strength of the active forces and can mobilize the remaining 30% within 24 hours, maybe even faster.
@SuperBomber01 Of course. The gist of it, more or less, is that if hostilities were to continue in the Korean War, the ROK Armed Forces would achieve victory without much effort.
@glsblink In comparison, the DPRK has virtually no allies save China, and even at that, it's highly unlikely that the PRC would resort to war to protect what it now views as a liability. The KPA also lacks in training quality, morale, esprit de corps, and weaponry/vehicle/aircraft/equipment quality, nevermind that it still uses tactics dating back to the Korean War. In brief, I have no doubts that my fellow soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen would be able to successfully repulse an attack.
@glsblink 2.5 million troops that are poorly supplied, fed and are slowly starving to death. Their industrial capabilities are almost completely zero. The minefield at the DMZ itself will take weeks to clear out and by the time they start that task, they'll be under heavy fire from US and ROK air power. Massed infantry tactics in the 21st century is more or less the same as the cavalrymen charging enemy trenches manned with machine guns and mortars during WW1.
@macccerkiddd The K11 is only in limited service at the moment; it's a very expensive rifle. Troops of the Ashena Unit in Afghanistan have been issued them I know for sure, but I'm not entirely sure whether or not they are the only ones: I'm a Black Beret, and we still use K1As and K2s.
I Scroll down to see the comments to look what people think about this new future weapons and they are Measuring Whose taller, The gun or a Women... What a bunch of Morons.... -_-
That is a terrible design execution. A firearm weapon needs to be as much a part of the soldier as possible that extends all their abilities - it should not slow down the fighter at all, hinder agility, and it should seriously NOT make the soldier a bigger target - that massive computer scope forces you to expose more of yourself. Any hand-held weapon should also be usable as some kind of club, blade or other hand-to-hand weapon with ease in any pinch. It's just a fierce range weapon.
@gagagaga275 Suggesting that a modern army should use AK-47's is like suggesting to a WWII soldier that he should use a cap-and-ball musket. They're old as hell. The -47 means 1947, as in 60+ years ago.
If you're such a huge fan of the Kalashnikov design, suggest a variant of the newer AK-100 series. Of course, good luck trying to hide in a trench when the enemy's using airburst grenades like these.
At any Russian weapons could be mounted ballistic computer, thermal and night sight, an electronic optical amplifier, integrated fire control system, etc. There is nothing special. For Russian AG-40 grenade launcher has a system of remote detonation 40-mm ammunition similar to XM29, Mk-47, Mk19 and K-11.
@RaptorDiablo my dad was in the soviet army back in the 70's he said that the AK's back then equiped with a very inexpensive scope would easily hit targets the size of playing cards at 300 yards because thats exactly how they practiced, dont get offended or mad at my comment as i am just telling you what i heard no gun is in accurate no gun is in effective all guns are accurate all guns are very effective you just have to master the gun,
@RaptorDiablo the only possible choice you'd have that could maybe work was "C" put two bullets in your face with the M4 lol using a HE 20mm gernade would take quite awhile to effectivly aim due to wind and distance the large projectile at 300 yards would need very highly trained aiming that could take about a minute, launching a 120 laser guided martar would take much longer again due to wind and range, bringing army personal to stop somone from shooting you is retarded lol the AK is quicker
@RaptorDiablo for all of you out there who totaly bag on the AK-47 and call yourself gun experts you are very uneducated, the AK-47 ALONE has killed and taken the lifes of more people then every weapon ever biult from knifes to hand guns to nuclear weapons put together, the AK-47 is easily the best assault rifle ever biult and it has never been matched, 60 years from now the m4 the m16 will be forgoten and only used for collection purposes such as the thompson sub machine gun
@123SupArman123 The kill count is easily explained by its availability and age, rather than any "quality" of the weapon itself. In many wars it's been ak-47 vs ak-47, so quality differences to other guns don't even enter the picture. Also, if it's the absolute best, what's up with the more recent ak rifles? Are they just special purpose weapons?
@mahujanet are you listening to yourself? your saying its such an aged gun which is why it has so many kills... well did you ever stop to think why people use this gun for the past 80 years none stop hense its high kill count? BECAUSE ITS A QUALITY GUN, smart ass your telling me its not a quality gun, but then say people have used it for almosd 100 years you are an idiot, andnewer versions of AK's are based on the AK-47 model, all guns are based on models, it IS the best rifle, ask national geo.
@mahujanet what is quality? Pretty fancy looks? Or battle effectiveness and reliability? AK has both of those... so that means that it is one of the most qualified guns.
@RaptorDiablo the AK-47 will still be sued with a vast majority of the world the AK-47 was biult in 1947, and still prooves highly more effective then any m4 or m16 because it is still sued today and will be sued for the next 100 years the m4 will be forgoten so will the m16 they are not significant just as ww1 weapons have been forgoten so will these, the AK-47 will always be remmembered as the king, of all weapons in realiabily price, and effectivness
@RaptorDiablo your assuming incorrectly considering all your answers are that of an un educated unrealistic thought that only a child who bases his knowledge off video games would know about
@RaptorDiablo Your options ABD might screw him over - BD only if they're available on short notice - but if he's any good that could easily be after you got killed yourself. C might - if you can manage it - save your own life. In practice, you don't want him shooting at you before you've killed him, "ancient" ak-47 or no. As evidence, I file the training US soldiers receive. Do not underestimate an enemy. Extreme example - against an unprepared target, bow and arrow are as lethal as ever.
@gagagaga275 Aside from its reliability, among the major reasons why the AK-47 is widely used is because of it's extremely cheap price. In the hands of a well-trained professional, it's good but in the hands of guerillas, terrorists and such, probably not since the Iraqi insurgents and Taliban almost never win a firefight against NATO forces.
In another two issued to another unit, condensation formed inside the laser reception lens, and the night-time range finder malfunctioned. And five K-11 rifles issued to another unit showed defects in switching from single to automatic fire.
"The rate of malfunction stands at 20 percent, which is unacceptable for issuance to troops," said a defense industry insider
According to Agency of Defense Development memos, seven out of 20 K-11 rifles issued to Korean soldiers in Afghanistan had eight different kinds of defects, which caused failures in laser range finders and other targeting systems. Two K-11 rifles issued to an unnamed unit exhibited barrel movements during firing and defects in the striking mechanism that ignites the ammunition.
Those defects or issues of K11 mentioned by PrometheanRunGood are now fixed, and K11 is now ready for official deployment and sales. As for sales overseas, talks with 10 countries are under way, from Europe, Middle East, South America and Oceania.
Fifteen of 39 new assault rifles issued to troops in June last year have defects, which translates into a 38.4 percent failure rate, it emerged on Sunday. The military has earmarked W448.5 billion (US$1=W1,116) to distribute the Korean-made K-11 assault rifle to troops by 2018, but a committee decided in mid-February to halt production and modify the design. It has cost W18.7 billion to develop so far.
Fuck man, look at South Korea go. These guys are on the verge of creating the future soldier, while the North Koreans still live in the mid-twentieth century. Fuck the Juche idea. When the North Korean Army storms across the border, they will be running back with shit-stained pants.
for sure, those 1.2 million soldiers, bout 500k stationed in border-close barracks,
will be running from those few ten thousands of south koreans...
north korea would overran the south in days, Seoul would fall within 3 to 4 days. the whole mass of tanks, infantry and the massive conventional artillery will blow the defenses up to nowhere.
the only chance for south korea is massive u.s. support, or the new border will be nomore at the 38° latidude, but the 36°
@patta8388 The only real reason NK has a larger Army is because the military is the most important part of society (Juche) and any smart North Korean boy knows that's the best opportunity he has in this underdeveloped nation of his. The military there is still not as modern as South Korea's, and for all I know, outside of the NKSOF, the main tactic is still probably the ever so effective surprise zerg rush that gains momentum before being overstretched and forced to retreat.
@SonicobbsessedR2 I actually see this kind of military progress as necessary to keep up with North Korea. Despite the technological inferiority of North Korea, they still have the highest enlistment rate per percentage population, and due to the proximity of South Korea's capital to North Korea, their 'old school' artillery would unfortunately still devastate South Korea.
@superjared 'Old school' artillery, which most are very likely not even maintained properly. Their high conscription rate doesn't mean jack if they can't even supply, feed and equip them properly. The chances of them breaking through the DMZ is almost nil and the only areas affected by whatever artillery that's still properly functioning would be the upper part of South Korea. Not the entire country.
@SonicobbsessedR2 What matters more is not advancements in weaponry and technology. What matters more is the steel of the men using/firing those weapons. What I'm worried about is all of this technology giving these soldiers too much of a sense of security and making the "future soldier" go completely soft, due to having so much of a technological edge. For some reason, the idea of my country's soldiers fighting battles the old fashioned way gives me more of a sense of security.
@MrAlexH1991 You have no idea how hard the ROK trains its military....there's a reason why they get a lot of respect from their US counterparts, especially the Army, Marines and special forces.
Mahh every nations is getting the same kinda technology now ... In France they call that "Guepard projet" (cheetah project) and the US/Germany/Spain/UK/ some other western nations and maybe Japan are "creating the soldier of the future" ... OFC Us still has the biggest expectations out of it since they wanna implement individual drones technology with versatile centralized automated communication tank like units at the rear.
While the poor S. Korean is lying in darkness with his overweight grenade launcher trying to to lazer-paint the target, the north korean solder will have enough time to squeeze out 10 or more rounds at him with his AK-47 designed in 1947 - which can also be dumped in water/mud and run over with a tank and still function.
The best part were the Korean women at the end - it is would be far nicer to lie in bed with a korean wife than lie in a cold trench with a can of irradiated beans :-)
If the rifles that heavy they need it to be a 7.62x51 instead of 5.56 it just makes more sense. BTW radiactive96 youre a racist asshole. Shut up they designed this not us. Now i know why everyone hates my country its because of people like yourself.
@radiactive96 Yellow men? A lot of men in Asia are yellow, Bitch. Stealing America's shit? You said it yourself, America is shit. And this was America's idea? In what way? You fucking dumbass. Why dont you do a little more research then come back and insult a continent. You're a little 10 year old mother fucker arent you. Why dont you shut the fuck up prick? If this was America's shit, Why didn't create it first? Fucking shithole.
@pidromonz Your kidding me right? The current world we live in is all about which countries his the best. This isn't the 19th century my friend, nor the 20th. The 21st century will have endless wars to civil wars. Especially South Korea, having North Korea as there neighbor they need the best of the best, defensive and offensive.
@pidromonz Im not trying to get in a aurgument or anything but if you support freedom you (in a way) support war or some type of conflict. If you realy think about it most countries have gained or kept there freedom because of war. There are exeptions or course but what im saying is that war is happening and will probely continue to happen. Im not saying i support war at all im against it im only stating the facts about it.
@pidromonz AAAAANGST! BTW if people didn't defend your country from those who want to invade, you would wouldn't have your freedom. Sometimes war is a necessary evil.
@TheOmniscientSpanner do you have Freedom now? being controlled by the media , by the governments ? living in a money system?
do you call this freedom?
defend my country from what? the people who 'defend' countries are the politicians, who sens dumb brainwashed people to war, a person who has a head on his shoulders would not go to die for 'his country"(= the politicians)
@pidromonz 1. Yes, I do have freedom, besides compulsory education I am not told what to do with my life as long as my behavior is not detrimental to society.
2. Media? Anything I base my facts on comes from a source independent from the goverment eg BBC News.
3. Government? Does not limit my lifestyle choices in any way beyond laws to keep order.
4. Money System? As opposed to what else?? I buy anything I want, as long I can afford some thing and it is legal, I can buy it, seems free to me.
@YeshuaChuy Yeshua means Jesus Christ in Hebrew. Oh and I don't like the North Koreans. Also you're correct about the ration thing. Kim Jon Il doesn't feed his people.
they're actually adopting the gun, awesome i'm glad to see a friendly nation adopt HEAB grenade launchers, does the K-11 have a built in thermal sight because $14,000 seems pretty cheap
muuuuuute
DerBierSchmeisser 1 day ago
What a gay video!! just a waste of time.
Jake42391 4 days ago
2:50 is that Girls Generation?
rjtabios25 2 weeks ago
@rjtabios25 Yes it's them hahaha
alister214 1 week ago
2:26-2:40 "This how we surrender on dirt; This how we surrender on rocks; This how we surrender on the road." ; )
silverwings21 1 month ago 2
@silverwings21 Drop test. It tests the weapon's ability to handle stresses; more or less a durability test.
AbberantRender 2 weeks ago
@AbberantRender
I know, I was just making a joke. ; )
silverwings21 2 weeks ago
My choice is M70ab2 :D
BeFrise 1 month ago
The ROK Army soldier is equipped with a dual calibre weapon, while the US Army soldier still use the M4. Could it be, that South Korea is richer than the US ?
kertaspaper94 1 month ago
@kertaspaper94 We're a much smaller nation. By land-mass, in fact, the ROK measures smaller than most American states. That said, we're also a Global 20 export-driven economy. It's not so much that we're richer, but more that the costs we incur are much less than those of the U.S.
AbberantRender 2 weeks ago
who ever made this must have been in a hurry
darksoul1381 3 months ago
haha liked it when it fired 5.56mm rounds as a bonus after firing the grenade
darksoul1381 3 months ago
lol, go to fight with godizlla :P
Marcin206pl 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
koreans are totally crazy...only war!!!
roBEAT95 3 months ago
its kinda unwieldy and heavy. imagine long hours guard duty carrying that weapon.
ElfyHaikal 3 months ago
@aSector5 drop test.
Kim870925 3 months ago
I wish to start my own small nation,then I will buy K-11 for my army!!!
1joshjosh1 3 months ago
2:30 why are they droping their weapons?? are they retarded?
sSector5 3 months ago
@sSector5 As Kim said (he misspelled your username), it's a drop stress test. Seeing if the rifle will still work if dropped. As any serviceman will tell you, reliability is one of the most important things to consider when grading a rifle on performance.
AbberantRender 3 months ago
South Korea didn´t need weapons they have zerglings
xXmilkywayXx 4 months ago
mass-personel warfare is very powerful
Nexgcs 4 months ago
North have like 2.5 million troops ready to die first wave attack. Even u have latest weapon but no much ammo and men to use as good as useless in the battle field.
glsblink 4 months ago
@glsblink Kindly research before you post. Yes, it is true that we have only somewhere around 25.6 million regular service personnel. Too large a regular military, as with the DPRK, and we would lose combat efficiency to logistics fuckups and simple lack of troop quality. Where we lack in numbers, however, we make up for in having some of the best-trained infantry, cavalry, and airmen in the world, equipped with some of the most-advanced military technology.
AbberantRender 3 months ago
@glsblink Wrong figure, apologise: some 653,000 regulars and 3.2 million reservists (where I pulled the 25.6 million from, I have no clue). That blunder aside however, do mind that in addition to our national armed forces, we have the support of United States Forces Korea (USFK), lending us an additional approximate 30,000 personnel, also well-trained and well-equipped. Nevermind that NATO and the UN itself would also send armed support, as well as other allied nations.
AbberantRender 3 months ago
@AbberantRender Don't forget that the ROK also has a vastly larger source of manpower to replace its losses, along with superior industrial capability, logistics and financial reserves. I also heard somewhere that the 653,000 figure is only 70% of the total strength of the active forces and can mobilize the remaining 30% within 24 hours, maybe even faster.
SuperBomber01 3 months ago
@SuperBomber01 Of course. The gist of it, more or less, is that if hostilities were to continue in the Korean War, the ROK Armed Forces would achieve victory without much effort.
AbberantRender 3 months ago
@glsblink In comparison, the DPRK has virtually no allies save China, and even at that, it's highly unlikely that the PRC would resort to war to protect what it now views as a liability. The KPA also lacks in training quality, morale, esprit de corps, and weaponry/vehicle/aircraft/equipment quality, nevermind that it still uses tactics dating back to the Korean War. In brief, I have no doubts that my fellow soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen would be able to successfully repulse an attack.
AbberantRender 3 months ago
@glsblink 2.5 million troops that are poorly supplied, fed and are slowly starving to death. Their industrial capabilities are almost completely zero. The minefield at the DMZ itself will take weeks to clear out and by the time they start that task, they'll be under heavy fire from US and ROK air power. Massed infantry tactics in the 21st century is more or less the same as the cavalrymen charging enemy trenches manned with machine guns and mortars during WW1.
SuperBomber01 3 months ago
Wow! South Korean arms rock!
aciddeathadder 4 months ago
BULLSHIT WILL IT BE IN SERVICE IN 2009 ITS 2011 NOW AND IVE NOT SEEN ANY MODERN WARFARE FIREFIGHTS WITH ONE
macccerkiddd 4 months ago
@macccerkiddd The K11 is only in limited service at the moment; it's a very expensive rifle. Troops of the Ashena Unit in Afghanistan have been issued them I know for sure, but I'm not entirely sure whether or not they are the only ones: I'm a Black Beret, and we still use K1As and K2s.
AbberantRender 3 months ago
@AbberantRender make that 2012 now, still i bet its still in testing and obvisly in limited use :)
macccerkiddd 2 weeks ago
I Scroll down to see the comments to look what people think about this new future weapons and they are Measuring Whose taller, The gun or a Women... What a bunch of Morons.... -_-
lorf151 4 months ago
ไอ้เชี่ยติ่งขี้ก็อป
XolaSpectrum 5 months ago
@Wingard14 le mot juste. it has all the futuristic BS in it but its waaaaay to unhandy big fat unhandy shit rifle.
Montross 5 months ago
look up the xm-25 and why wont it tell us the wait of the k-11
USAmilitarypower 5 months ago
2:22 what dumbasses drop their weapon?!
SkillzzzSkillzzz 6 months ago
@SkillzzzSkillzzz Its TESTING.
RaptorDiablo 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo my question was soooo ironic!
SkillzzzSkillzzz 6 months ago
@SkillzzzSkillzzz Too test the FUCKING DURIBILITY U DUMBSHIT!!!!!!!!!!11
BlueDragen25 5 months ago
@SkillzzzSkillzzz omg i now but it looks sooooo dumb
SkillzzzSkillzzz 5 months ago
That is a terrible design execution. A firearm weapon needs to be as much a part of the soldier as possible that extends all their abilities - it should not slow down the fighter at all, hinder agility, and it should seriously NOT make the soldier a bigger target - that massive computer scope forces you to expose more of yourself. Any hand-held weapon should also be usable as some kind of club, blade or other hand-to-hand weapon with ease in any pinch. It's just a fierce range weapon.
SavageInsight 6 months ago
holy shit
igorbog88 6 months ago
hey it is just toy. do you know why AK-47 is much more simple useful.
everybody knows that. in the practical war. these toys will be useless.
gagagaga275 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gagagaga275 Suggesting that a modern army should use AK-47's is like suggesting to a WWII soldier that he should use a cap-and-ball musket. They're old as hell. The -47 means 1947, as in 60+ years ago.
If you're such a huge fan of the Kalashnikov design, suggest a variant of the newer AK-100 series. Of course, good luck trying to hide in a trench when the enemy's using airburst grenades like these.
CommanderCooper 6 months ago
@gagagaga275 Go back to Call of Duty, kid. AK-47 is very unaccurate. Do you know anything about real time war?
FallenLightx 6 months ago
@FallenLightx AK-74M very accurate
DisgorgeKILLusa 5 months ago 11
@DisgorgeKILLusa Thats AK-74M LOL.
FallenLightx 5 months ago
@FallenLightx ???
At any Russian weapons could be mounted ballistic computer, thermal and night sight, an electronic optical amplifier, integrated fire control system, etc. There is nothing special. For Russian AG-40 grenade launcher has a system of remote detonation 40-mm ammunition similar to XM29, Mk-47, Mk19 and K-11.
DisgorgeKILLusa 5 months ago 3
@DisgorgeKILLusa AK-108 or an-94 is much more accurate.
Iamsofuckingspecial 2 months ago
@gagagaga275 so what your saying, is that if your 300 yards away, you can shoot me with a ak-47, before i:
A) use a HE air burst 20mm grenade
B) launch a 120 laser guided mortar shell at you
C) put two bullets in your face with my m4
D) bring my armored personnel carrier with 6 soldiers armed to the teeth.
ORRRR
E) All of the above.
Take your time to pick, as we all know retardation can slow you down a bit.
RaptorDiablo 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo my dad was in the soviet army back in the 70's he said that the AK's back then equiped with a very inexpensive scope would easily hit targets the size of playing cards at 300 yards because thats exactly how they practiced, dont get offended or mad at my comment as i am just telling you what i heard no gun is in accurate no gun is in effective all guns are accurate all guns are very effective you just have to master the gun,
123SupArman123 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo the only possible choice you'd have that could maybe work was "C" put two bullets in your face with the M4 lol using a HE 20mm gernade would take quite awhile to effectivly aim due to wind and distance the large projectile at 300 yards would need very highly trained aiming that could take about a minute, launching a 120 laser guided martar would take much longer again due to wind and range, bringing army personal to stop somone from shooting you is retarded lol the AK is quicker
123SupArman123 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo for all of you out there who totaly bag on the AK-47 and call yourself gun experts you are very uneducated, the AK-47 ALONE has killed and taken the lifes of more people then every weapon ever biult from knifes to hand guns to nuclear weapons put together, the AK-47 is easily the best assault rifle ever biult and it has never been matched, 60 years from now the m4 the m16 will be forgoten and only used for collection purposes such as the thompson sub machine gun
123SupArman123 6 months ago
@123SupArman123 The kill count is easily explained by its availability and age, rather than any "quality" of the weapon itself. In many wars it's been ak-47 vs ak-47, so quality differences to other guns don't even enter the picture. Also, if it's the absolute best, what's up with the more recent ak rifles? Are they just special purpose weapons?
mahujanet 6 months ago
@mahujanet are you listening to yourself? your saying its such an aged gun which is why it has so many kills... well did you ever stop to think why people use this gun for the past 80 years none stop hense its high kill count? BECAUSE ITS A QUALITY GUN, smart ass your telling me its not a quality gun, but then say people have used it for almosd 100 years you are an idiot, andnewer versions of AK's are based on the AK-47 model, all guns are based on models, it IS the best rifle, ask national geo.
123SupArman123 6 months ago
@mahujanet what is quality? Pretty fancy looks? Or battle effectiveness and reliability? AK has both of those... so that means that it is one of the most qualified guns.
MrKerag 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo the AK-47 will still be sued with a vast majority of the world the AK-47 was biult in 1947, and still prooves highly more effective then any m4 or m16 because it is still sued today and will be sued for the next 100 years the m4 will be forgoten so will the m16 they are not significant just as ww1 weapons have been forgoten so will these, the AK-47 will always be remmembered as the king, of all weapons in realiabily price, and effectivness
123SupArman123 6 months ago
@123SupArman123 I'm assuming you picked E.
RaptorDiablo 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo your assuming incorrectly considering all your answers are that of an un educated unrealistic thought that only a child who bases his knowledge off video games would know about
123SupArman123 6 months ago
@123SupArman123 Thank you for your conformation. E it is.
Result: YOU DIE.
Thank you for taking the test, come again!
RaptorDiablo 6 months ago
@RaptorDiablo Your options ABD might screw him over - BD only if they're available on short notice - but if he's any good that could easily be after you got killed yourself. C might - if you can manage it - save your own life. In practice, you don't want him shooting at you before you've killed him, "ancient" ak-47 or no. As evidence, I file the training US soldiers receive. Do not underestimate an enemy. Extreme example - against an unprepared target, bow and arrow are as lethal as ever.
mahujanet 6 months ago
@gagagaga275 Aside from its reliability, among the major reasons why the AK-47 is widely used is because of it's extremely cheap price. In the hands of a well-trained professional, it's good but in the hands of guerillas, terrorists and such, probably not since the Iraqi insurgents and Taliban almost never win a firefight against NATO forces.
SuperBomber01 3 months ago
@SuperBomber01 Well the main reason why they almost never win a firefight against NATO forces are rather that NATO forces got CAS and ACOGs imho
Th3UnD3TaK3r 2 months ago
please dont associate snsd with weapons. i know your patriotic to your country, but im pretty sure they dont like war
andrewkong 6 months ago
The gun looks really cool but carrying 6.1+ kg all the time? Too heavy for an assault rifle.
Hardstylerocka 6 months ago
So an assualt rifle mixed with a bullpup grenade launcher? Who the hell thought of that? Btw the ending made me like the video. :)
AsianDomination911 6 months ago
круче чем КОРД нет оружия!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sevan005 6 months ago
HMmmm i would like to have one
To shoot cats :P
Killerdonky01 6 months ago
was the end really necessary lol
whyhedodat 7 months ago
In another two issued to another unit, condensation formed inside the laser reception lens, and the night-time range finder malfunctioned. And five K-11 rifles issued to another unit showed defects in switching from single to automatic fire.
"The rate of malfunction stands at 20 percent, which is unacceptable for issuance to troops," said a defense industry insider
PrometheanRunGood 7 months ago
According to Agency of Defense Development memos, seven out of 20 K-11 rifles issued to Korean soldiers in Afghanistan had eight different kinds of defects, which caused failures in laser range finders and other targeting systems. Two K-11 rifles issued to an unnamed unit exhibited barrel movements during firing and defects in the striking mechanism that ignites the ammunition.
PrometheanRunGood 7 months ago
@PrometheanRunGood Hmm... I hadda feeling the gun was too radical to be reliable. Good info dude.
SuperSneakySniper 7 months ago
@SuperSneakySniper
Those defects or issues of K11 mentioned by PrometheanRunGood are now fixed, and K11 is now ready for official deployment and sales. As for sales overseas, talks with 10 countries are under way, from Europe, Middle East, South America and Oceania.
Source (Korean news media): news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD&mid=sec&sid1=102&oid=003&aid=0003957989
There are always spots for improvement in any newly developed and deployed weapons. K11A1 in 2 years, maybe?
youngk9lover 6 months ago
Fifteen of 39 new assault rifles issued to troops in June last year have defects, which translates into a 38.4 percent failure rate, it emerged on Sunday. The military has earmarked W448.5 billion (US$1=W1,116) to distribute the Korean-made K-11 assault rifle to troops by 2018, but a committee decided in mid-February to halt production and modify the design. It has cost W18.7 billion to develop so far.
PrometheanRunGood 7 months ago
damn this will come up in mw3 -.-
Backpaper96 7 months ago
엿같은 소녀시대 씨발년들은 왜 넣는겁니까;
차라리 그냥 K-11사격 사진을 올리시지;
coolglock19 7 months ago
norway fuck yeah!!! HK416 fuck yeah!!! will own your sittyasses fuck yeah!!!
Before u have time to start worldwar 3 fuck yeah!!!
RYEMANIAC 7 months ago
What's the name of this song? It's actually not that bad.
itak365 7 months ago
Still take you outwith a sniper from 800 metres away
chaywonna 7 months ago
that gun fucking sucks, i'd rather have my ak-47, or the AR-16 HHOOOORAA.
Hightimes297 7 months ago
@Hightimes297 More like your Type-81 with shitty surplus ammo.
kilkun 7 months ago
they are very ,very, smart people, with very small penis.
Hightimes297 7 months ago
K11 = 6.1kg (Titanium+aluminium alloy)
sollongos 7 months ago
those korry's are advancing fast..., i wonder why?
wuheheehahahahaha 7 months ago
@wuheheehahahahaha Maybe because they got one helluva crazy neighbor to the north of them...
MrThomPS3 7 months ago
GG, kim-jong-il...
SirHungryHippo 8 months ago
This is the kind of gun that should be on future weapons
sangminlee1234 8 months ago
SNSD ! Saving the best for last I see :) Smart choice, may every able man join forces with SK if needed.
MeTube4D 8 months ago
Want to see them drop it from 2m with muzzle first
LuckeWent 8 months ago
Fuck man, look at South Korea go. These guys are on the verge of creating the future soldier, while the North Koreans still live in the mid-twentieth century. Fuck the Juche idea. When the North Korean Army storms across the border, they will be running back with shit-stained pants.
SonicobbsessedR2 8 months ago 22
@SonicobbsessedR2
for sure, those 1.2 million soldiers, bout 500k stationed in border-close barracks,
will be running from those few ten thousands of south koreans...
north korea would overran the south in days, Seoul would fall within 3 to 4 days. the whole mass of tanks, infantry and the massive conventional artillery will blow the defenses up to nowhere.
the only chance for south korea is massive u.s. support, or the new border will be nomore at the 38° latidude, but the 36°
patta8388 6 months ago
@patta8388 The only real reason NK has a larger Army is because the military is the most important part of society (Juche) and any smart North Korean boy knows that's the best opportunity he has in this underdeveloped nation of his. The military there is still not as modern as South Korea's, and for all I know, outside of the NKSOF, the main tactic is still probably the ever so effective surprise zerg rush that gains momentum before being overstretched and forced to retreat.
SonicobbsessedR2 6 months ago
@SonicobbsessedR2
they don't have the newest technologies, but they have more than 1.000.000 fanatical soldiers, and nukes :(
ConstantinIV 5 months ago
@SonicobbsessedR2 I actually see this kind of military progress as necessary to keep up with North Korea. Despite the technological inferiority of North Korea, they still have the highest enlistment rate per percentage population, and due to the proximity of South Korea's capital to North Korea, their 'old school' artillery would unfortunately still devastate South Korea.
very cool rifle though.
superjared 5 months ago
@superjared 'Old school' artillery, which most are very likely not even maintained properly. Their high conscription rate doesn't mean jack if they can't even supply, feed and equip them properly. The chances of them breaking through the DMZ is almost nil and the only areas affected by whatever artillery that's still properly functioning would be the upper part of South Korea. Not the entire country.
SuperBomber01 3 months ago
@SonicobbsessedR2 What matters more is not advancements in weaponry and technology. What matters more is the steel of the men using/firing those weapons. What I'm worried about is all of this technology giving these soldiers too much of a sense of security and making the "future soldier" go completely soft, due to having so much of a technological edge. For some reason, the idea of my country's soldiers fighting battles the old fashioned way gives me more of a sense of security.
MrAlexH1991 4 months ago
@MrAlexH1991 I suppose you have a point, whenever you put it that way.
SonicobbsessedR2 4 months ago
@MrAlexH1991 You have no idea how hard the ROK trains its military....there's a reason why they get a lot of respect from their US counterparts, especially the Army, Marines and special forces.
SuperBomber01 3 months ago
Fuck off K-11 take G36/ M416/ M417!!!! (all german guns xD.....)
ALLinONEgamer 8 months ago
What is this song? Kudos to anyone who knows. Thanks.
saelfeman 8 months ago
Plazenta? 0:12
ullbeak 8 months ago
Korea sucks, and Kim Jong-il can't play golf for shit.
sawedoff870 8 months ago
weird song!
kieferkippy 8 months ago
@2:28 HOLY SH!T THERE MILITARY CAN DROP GUNS!
zogisuber10 8 months ago
General Rifle + K11 100meter running
yacha333 9 months ago
lighters always better.
lolz
Rudekilla32 9 months ago
The song is sick man, when he sing it out make me feel like . . . . .
HikaruMatsuoka1 9 months ago
This all weapon is early already have in 2005 something. . . .
HikaruMatsuoka1 9 months ago
That gun weights about 22 pounds, have you seen the average korean, how good the gun is isent going to matter if thay cant carry the damn thing
Happysarg 9 months ago
the gun is kind of big, makes it harder to aim. maybe if they reduce the size of the huge scope as they R&D, then all the soldiers cna have one.
fobgalore 9 months ago
@fobgalore it is a multi-functioning all weather infrared and thermal scope they cant reduce the size...
MrAzzman31 9 months ago
2:49 that kinda blow me away.. lol :))
XrayLancer14 9 months ago
Wish South Korean good luck when they are fighting war with the North Koreans!!!
Funing624 9 months ago
lol Girl's Generation at the end XD
stiffeg 9 months ago
song?
Moerdarvalen 9 months ago
What the hell did I just watch.
dleshkov93 9 months ago
@dleshkov93 Well if you had captions off a series of images with no apparant purpose, unless you read the captions.
STEPHENDANERD 9 months ago
Mahh every nations is getting the same kinda technology now ... In France they call that "Guepard projet" (cheetah project) and the US/Germany/Spain/UK/ some other western nations and maybe Japan are "creating the soldier of the future" ... OFC Us still has the biggest expectations out of it since they wanna implement individual drones technology with versatile centralized automated communication tank like units at the rear.
U.S still owns !
Antiteshmis 9 months ago
Holy Shit! Koreans have alien tech! XD!
timothychong48 9 months ago
coolllllllllllll
Just go and try it at the north.
cityhunterhf 9 months ago
While the poor S. Korean is lying in darkness with his overweight grenade launcher trying to to lazer-paint the target, the north korean solder will have enough time to squeeze out 10 or more rounds at him with his AK-47 designed in 1947 - which can also be dumped in water/mud and run over with a tank and still function.
The best part were the Korean women at the end - it is would be far nicer to lie in bed with a korean wife than lie in a cold trench with a can of irradiated beans :-)
konman001 10 months ago
@konman001
This is a support weapon for long ranges, so talking about how many rounds the AK47 can fire compared to it, doesn't really make sense.
EikC 9 months ago
@EikC - then how come almost everybody (including companies in USA) make it look like weapons of this sort will replace assault rifles in the future?
As a support weapon yes...I can see that . . .but not as a staple weapon.
Question for you - what do you think of the Korean women at the end? :-O
konman001 9 months ago
I don't understand the meaning of the girls at the end...
ilgrecoxxx 10 months ago
its only a mater of time before the world goes into a grueling war that will change humanity forever.
AwesomeSauce240 10 months ago
If the rifles that heavy they need it to be a 7.62x51 instead of 5.56 it just makes more sense. BTW radiactive96 youre a racist asshole. Shut up they designed this not us. Now i know why everyone hates my country its because of people like yourself.
Ghillie334 10 months ago
If they could use the XM-29 equiped with the scopes, rails and grenade luancher of the K-11 and build it out of polymer! Problem solved.
LolTacular01 10 months ago
i wish the fucking yellow men would stop stealin america's shit
radiactive96 10 months ago
@radiactive96 Yellow men? A lot of men in Asia are yellow, Bitch. Stealing America's shit? You said it yourself, America is shit. And this was America's idea? In what way? You fucking dumbass. Why dont you do a little more research then come back and insult a continent. You're a little 10 year old mother fucker arent you. Why dont you shut the fuck up prick? If this was America's shit, Why didn't create it first? Fucking shithole.
timothychong48 9 months ago
@timothychong48 ok man com down and go get u some rice..
radiactive96 9 months ago
Comment removed
radiactive96 10 months ago
I must say it's a nice idea to go with
A 2 in 1 weapon system with one trigger But there is a big problem. Practicality
The system is expensive as hell to make
The parts are bulky And heavy
And Aiming takes forever with the targeting module
It is a nice idea but it's to far ahead of it's time and needs more testing more prototypes and more investors
STEVATUNA 10 months ago
i like how u give the definition
Samman912 11 months ago
lets get back to the AKs!
ItAreMe 11 months ago
Recently they found that K-11 has some problems in its parts.
But still, nice challenge.
Kim870925 11 months ago
The K11 look Cooler & better Than The M4 right or not
eggjj2001 11 months ago
@eggjj2001 looks only....looks only.
Ahamster1 11 months ago
So, thats what giving up when you are being over run by opposition.
megariot 11 months ago
2:52 make my dick heavyer
hfeo 11 months ago
The government in Korea has seriously decided to refrain from developing K-11 project. It's not cool.
SangheeLove 1 year ago
Bunch of ignorant media fucked kids below. BEWARE.
muststayfresh 1 year ago
why waste time making weapons , instead of thinking of ways to make human kind better , not kill people
pidromonz 1 year ago
@pidromonz Your kidding me right? The current world we live in is all about which countries his the best. This isn't the 19th century my friend, nor the 20th. The 21st century will have endless wars to civil wars. Especially South Korea, having North Korea as there neighbor they need the best of the best, defensive and offensive.
muststayfresh 1 year ago
@muststayfresh more war, more suffering...only brain washed idiots go to war...brains washed with money that is
i support freedom, not war
pidromonz 1 year ago
@pidromonz Im not trying to get in a aurgument or anything but if you support freedom you (in a way) support war or some type of conflict. If you realy think about it most countries have gained or kept there freedom because of war. There are exeptions or course but what im saying is that war is happening and will probely continue to happen. Im not saying i support war at all im against it im only stating the facts about it.
joshmathieu 1 year ago
@pidromonz AAAAANGST! BTW if people didn't defend your country from those who want to invade, you would wouldn't have your freedom. Sometimes war is a necessary evil.
TheOmniscientSpanner 1 year ago
@TheOmniscientSpanner do you have Freedom now? being controlled by the media , by the governments ? living in a money system?
do you call this freedom?
defend my country from what? the people who 'defend' countries are the politicians, who sens dumb brainwashed people to war, a person who has a head on his shoulders would not go to die for 'his country"(= the politicians)
pidromonz 11 months ago
@pidromonz 1. Yes, I do have freedom, besides compulsory education I am not told what to do with my life as long as my behavior is not detrimental to society.
2. Media? Anything I base my facts on comes from a source independent from the goverment eg BBC News.
3. Government? Does not limit my lifestyle choices in any way beyond laws to keep order.
4. Money System? As opposed to what else?? I buy anything I want, as long I can afford some thing and it is legal, I can buy it, seems free to me.
TheOmniscientSpanner 11 months ago
@TheOmniscientSpanner what you just told me is exactly the false impression of freedom , that is implemented in the minds
pidromonz 11 months ago
@pidromonz lol your a fucking idiot whats your idea of freedom all of us running around butt fucking animals?
littlemontev 11 months ago
@littlemontev no... it's fucking up idiots like you... that's all
pidromonz 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@muststayfresh more war, more suffering...only brain washed idiots go to war...brains washed with money that is
i support freedom, not war
pidromonz 1 year ago
@pidromonz man the fuck up
Willard142 11 months ago
When the electronics in those weapons fail The N Koreans will skull fuck the south...
MrIhatespork 1 year ago
@MrIhatespork All South Korea has to do in a war with the north is throw their rations at them. The rest is target practice.
YeshuaChuy 11 months ago 24
@YeshuaChuy Yeshua means Jesus Christ in Hebrew. Oh and I don't like the North Koreans. Also you're correct about the ration thing. Kim Jon Il doesn't feed his people.
MrIhatespork 11 months ago
@YeshuaChuy
To avoid putting themselves in danger, they should just load their mortars with Kimchi.
EikC 9 months ago
@YeshuaChuy not to sound stupid or like a fag here but, have you played Homefront?
AlKezer712 9 months ago
@YeshuaChuy
Well said
762rockettravis 9 months ago
@MrIhatespork All they need is an EMP and theyre done for...
DHyunC 11 months ago
@DHyunC Yup.
MrIhatespork 11 months ago
I choose the ladies!
jackazz1100 1 year ago
wow look at all those action figures :D
Wolfgamer94 1 year ago
fuck'n Dog eaterws. Die fuck'n Koreans!
Gmove02 1 year ago
its double d weight of m16
spmojo 1 year ago
FUCK NORTH KOREA
colemcgill13 1 year ago
FUCK NORTH KOREA
colemcgill13 1 year ago
they're actually adopting the gun, awesome i'm glad to see a friendly nation adopt HEAB grenade launchers, does the K-11 have a built in thermal sight because $14,000 seems pretty cheap
iknowmy3table 1 year ago
Korea Sucks . . .
HerrTrigger00 1 year ago