Maybe this is why bohr didnt use the word reality much. Here is his quote..
"We are suspended in language in such a way that we cannot say what is up and what is down. The word "reality" is also a word, a word which we must learn to use correctly."
My word! Even by the standards of academia, this "credit accounting" is tedious! Just skip to 09:30 to avoid the verbose introduction of the introducer, and the mostly irrelevant, but more verbose, introduction of the speaker. Just once I'd love to hear "He championed this idea in 1976, which turned out to be incorrect. And then championed that idea in 1985, which also turned out to be incorrect, and then...". ;-)
@skdkskdk Oh yeah. I'd forgotten I'd written that. By the time *that* lengthy introduction was over, everyone would have gotten up and left, and the speaker would be addressing an empty house.
Oh dear. What a painfully clunky way to present this experiment. In 'dumbing it down' for the audience in this manner he made it unnecessarily confusing, drawn-out and dull. Find any presentation of this experiment that isn't afraid to mention photon polarization for a clear, quicker, and more profound experience of quantum entanglement.
Einstein had a chuckle when a student at his lecture suggested 2 twins would be different ages if one spent a period of time travelling near the speed of light. Conversely, Einstein didn't chuckle when his own mathematics were extended to QntPhys and suggested that changing the spin of one electron would change another electron's spin instantly NO MATTER HOW FAR APART THEY ARE and faster than light. He also didn't like the 'statistical' nature of QPhysics. Read uncertain.
@trombone7 : Einstein was looking for beauty. But his aesthetic tastes were firmly rooted in the 19th century. No fault of his. We all suffer from that effect. His own Special and General Relativity framework pushed classical theory to its limit. (His sense of beauty was admirably flexible.) QM was a step too far for him. Today we accept it based on evidence. But we're necessarily more jaded than we were a hundred years ago.
This has been flagged as spam show
well explained topic thanks!
adelle0001 2 months ago
tap that arsh!
edtronic 4 months ago
Maybe this is why bohr didnt use the word reality much. Here is his quote..
"We are suspended in language in such a way that we cannot say what is up and what is down. The word "reality" is also a word, a word which we must learn to use correctly."
ThermalHD 9 months ago
the 2-2-2 position gonna mess up all his quantum thinkig...thats why he skip over that....:)
nolknolk 1 year ago
very good lecture and good explanation
robkim55 1 year ago
There's steam pouring through my ears!
Ugh... *leaves quantum physics and goes back to good old biology*
Thymonico 1 year ago
he doesn't really explain why you can't use the 2-2-2 position...
merrittolsen 1 year ago
My word! Even by the standards of academia, this "credit accounting" is tedious! Just skip to 09:30 to avoid the verbose introduction of the introducer, and the mostly irrelevant, but more verbose, introduction of the speaker. Just once I'd love to hear "He championed this idea in 1976, which turned out to be incorrect. And then championed that idea in 1985, which also turned out to be incorrect, and then...". ;-)
sbergman27 1 year ago 13
@sbergman27 Amen!
skdkskdk 3 weeks ago
@skdkskdk Oh yeah. I'd forgotten I'd written that. By the time *that* lengthy introduction was over, everyone would have gotten up and left, and the speaker would be addressing an empty house.
sbergman27 3 weeks ago
Oh dear. What a painfully clunky way to present this experiment. In 'dumbing it down' for the audience in this manner he made it unnecessarily confusing, drawn-out and dull. Find any presentation of this experiment that isn't afraid to mention photon polarization for a clear, quicker, and more profound experience of quantum entanglement.
dedalus 1 year ago
@dedalus Completely agree.
alexxxxxxxx1555 1 year ago
@dedalus have a youtube link for another one?
twstdelf 8 months ago
Einstein had a chuckle when a student at his lecture suggested 2 twins would be different ages if one spent a period of time travelling near the speed of light. Conversely, Einstein didn't chuckle when his own mathematics were extended to QntPhys and suggested that changing the spin of one electron would change another electron's spin instantly NO MATTER HOW FAR APART THEY ARE and faster than light. He also didn't like the 'statistical' nature of QPhysics. Read uncertain.
trombone7 2 years ago
@trombone7 : Einstein was looking for beauty. But his aesthetic tastes were firmly rooted in the 19th century. No fault of his. We all suffer from that effect. His own Special and General Relativity framework pushed classical theory to its limit. (His sense of beauty was admirably flexible.) QM was a step too far for him. Today we accept it based on evidence. But we're necessarily more jaded than we were a hundred years ago.
sbergman27 1 year ago
So THIS is what happened to Alannis Morrisette...
Djangeaux 2 years ago 5
Einstein never did this!
woundedwomb 3 years ago
He didn't like quantum physics. Called it spooky !
DavidAKZ 2 years ago
I wish more people would watch this... is a jewl
destinyuraqte 3 years ago
awesome
shunyata2 3 years ago