the proof seems lacking to me in that it uses the assertion that the line integral of Mdy plus the line integral of Ndx = the line integral of (Mdy + Ndx)... however this is surely not an elementary step. indeed when he first introduced this notation, i specifically remember him saying that you CANNOT separate the two integrals like this..?
26:44
haha thats awesome
KevZyro 1 month ago
great lecture. why on earth do they clap every single time he erases something !
FariFure 1 month ago
that line integral mechanism is really cool
SliperyNinjaOnATiger 1 month ago
The Green's Theorem is only to work if the curve is closed...
yonatanable 8 months ago
@yonatanable 6:55
gorgolyt 7 months ago
@yonatanable Yep! That's what the ∮ symbol indicates... an integral about a closed curve.
Yakeyglee 2 months ago
i like their chalk
XtQfH 10 months ago 6
@ltboneman but to do the integral you have to parameterise them in terms of the same variable and then solve...
if you just separate them then you'll end up just doing the separate partial integrals, which would be wrong?
gorgolyt 1 year ago
the proof seems lacking to me in that it uses the assertion that the line integral of Mdy plus the line integral of Ndx = the line integral of (Mdy + Ndx)... however this is surely not an elementary step. indeed when he first introduced this notation, i specifically remember him saying that you CANNOT separate the two integrals like this..?
gorgolyt 1 year ago
AWESOME! proof of Greens' Theorem made simple !! Thanks Prof. Auroux.
rohitarora1981 1 year ago
Wow, MIT is awesome for putting these up on Youtube.
JustinGreen22 2 years ago 8
Denis rules. Top class.
DeathJustice 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
3/4 of this lesson was waste of time i think...
kirkigr 2 years ago
nice!
kyousukeX 2 years ago 8
THAT IS SEXY
GHOST3R 3 years ago 17