@midnightsnakeboa the M16 and M4 did their job, you can't say it sucks just because it jams more than current day guns. Are you basing this on vietnam? because current day M4s and M16s dont jam as much, the only reason why it jammed a crapload back then was because the bold wasnt chrome plated, Soldiers didnt know that the gun needed to be cleaned, some soldiers modified the buffer spring to reduce the high rate of fire, and magazines were dented easily. do some research
because the mag. is in the rear of the gun. so the bullet primer gets struck closer to your sholder then for say... a m16 were the mag. is in the front.
Ive heard reports that it is reliable, but how does it hold up to sand, water, cold and hot temperatures? I know its easy to field strip but is it easy to clean and maintain? How often does it need cleaning? How does it compare in reliability to other nato used weapons?
Gotta love bullpup weapons.
EmperorHelix 1 year ago 4
the m16 and m4 suck u have to clean the more than u get to use them.soon the HK416 will take it place.
midnightsnakeboa 1 year ago 2
@midnightsnakeboa the M16 and M4 did their job, you can't say it sucks just because it jams more than current day guns. Are you basing this on vietnam? because current day M4s and M16s dont jam as much, the only reason why it jammed a crapload back then was because the bold wasnt chrome plated, Soldiers didnt know that the gun needed to be cleaned, some soldiers modified the buffer spring to reduce the high rate of fire, and magazines were dented easily. do some research
mandalore1000 1 year ago
@midnightsnakeboa soviet weapons beat all
lalablablaification 6 months ago
Recoil is not low because of that pussy can't hold the gun...
ImthatAnimator 1 year ago
Nice rifle. too bad the U.S. will never adopt a bullpup design.
CMarchand41 1 year ago
They say the recoil is actually very low on this gun.
Nintendogene 2 years ago
For the first or second shots it seems. Even experienced persons get pushed back from a full auto shot.
FatalFist 2 years ago
it appears to be
woohoopy 2 years ago
I love the F2000, I wish I had one...
The recoil looks strong, but, who cares?
NecroArs 2 years ago
because the mag. is in the rear of the gun. so the bullet primer gets struck closer to your sholder then for say... a m16 were the mag. is in the front.
mapleman747 2 years ago
Strong recoil ?
ambercrown 2 years ago
no, a bad operator
jdan007 2 years ago
a little tiny bit stronger than m4
commommm 2 years ago
Waar was dit?
Briggs1700 2 years ago
halo...
zehb245 3 years ago
splinter cell... idiot
HoBoMoBob 2 years ago
I actually like the original scope. It is big enough so you dont have to squint and prevent eyelid/eyelash interference.
Wotenkeld 3 years ago
without the scope it looks pretty cool.
prefer the xm8 tho
Nielsx1 3 years ago
im just talking looks right now.. yes i am one of those persons..
Nielsx1 3 years ago
Comment removed
Weirdologist 3 years ago 3
xm8 got cancelled in October 31, 2005. :(
devi001 3 years ago
why are you all crazy for XM8 just use G36 its better..
LolCats42 3 years ago
same thing...xm8 looks cooler thats all
jchoo34 2 years ago
no it doesnt
GSBELKA 2 years ago
it's not. G36 had lot of problems too. XM8 was great concept.
thePavuk 2 years ago
I hope they stick with it and modify it to convey the SCAR from Crysis since that's initially where Crysis borrowed it's design from.
FatalFist 2 years ago
Ive heard reports that it is reliable, but how does it hold up to sand, water, cold and hot temperatures? I know its easy to field strip but is it easy to clean and maintain? How often does it need cleaning? How does it compare in reliability to other nato used weapons?
garageflower2002 3 years ago
cool
BrolySs6 3 years ago
to qiete
sniper99999999999 4 years ago
It's known to be a very loud rifle actually.
ArdeenseJagers 3 years ago
i ment the film
sniper99999999999 3 years ago