@beyondcool I'm pretty sure as Ronnie went down to take the shot, he touched a ball and owned up to the fowl. That then left John in an awkward position of having to take a shot from an awkward position, which he wouldn't have had to do had Ronnie not fouled. In effect, the foul Ronnie committed worked in Ronnie's favour...
@Airblader that is one hell of a loop hole. like the commentator said, players could just pretend to move a ball to get out of a miss sequence. Crazy rule. cheers for the answer though mate
@Gellis2009 Actually, they could not. If done on purpose, it can be ruled as unsportsmanlike conduct and thus lead to the loss of the frame/game. Although it would be hard to judge whether it was done on purpose or not.
@mikeymandem if the player doesnt hit the ball he intends to hit the ref calls a miss meaning isnt a good enough attempt his opponent can ask the ref to replace the ball, or he can carry on from where the balls ended up.
@ewanthug No the rule on 3 misses in a row then the frame gets given away is only if you have a clear straight path to make contact with the ball and you decide to play the shot another way. Most common when trying to nestle on a red when you are struggling to get the cue ball back to baulk
@MrBlackoralive okay now i clearly understand .. thank you so much for your explanation . this is very weird situation, i never see some attempt that takes like more than six, is that refferee decision on this video? i mean when ronnie's attempt? and after ronnie then higgins,why higgins straight out to blue?is that a foul on blue?
@ewanthug Thats ok no worries. It is an odd situation. The reason the referee let it continue and take 6 attempts was because ronnie had an easy colour to hit than the brown or yellow (the blue which was a one cushion escape) but ronnie picked the harder shot to not leave a red therefore it was called a miss . The reason Higgins didn't foul is when the cue ball is touching a red, you simply have to hit the cue ball away from the red (it doesnt matter what colour ball you hit afterwards)
@MrBlackoralive okay, when higgins hit the blue.. i get it! haha i see that the cue ball touch the red already! wow.. should focus on that more.. wait a minute, if player miss the ball colour after red, then the cue ball is placing back at the position when they are miss? damn. have u watch the WAR part 6 ronnie and jimmy when ronnie cue ball stuck at pink?damn miss foul4-4- and then 6!! its 3 times! different than this situation. thanks brother! i'm such an noob . :) peace from Malaysia
And yes it was the referee who decides in the end which shot is the easier and would therefore call a miss on if the referee knows ronnie isnt taking the easier shot which he could hit or get closer too at least. Its usually called a miss no matter how close you get to the object ball even if its the easiest to hit. I think only in extreme circumstances would the referee give it simply as a foul and leave the balls as they are.
One of the things amateurs and non players should recognise is that playing on new cloth causes sidespin on the cueball to slide.. . meaning that playing on a new surface is a hell of a lot harder than your regular club cloth. Harsh on Ronnie here.
The 'miss' rule in snooker is lame, Ronnie rightly took advantage and deliberately fouled to gain his own advantage over an unfair rule. But the damage was already done
wait,i thought the cue ball is touching the red?if it's a touching ball,i thought u could any how u want with/without contacting any other balls at all?
It can't have been a foul and a miss when he touched the red, because he didn't take his shot, so he didn't miss, therefore it was only a foul, and there was no miss.
because there wasn't a shot its a technical foul and not a miss foul. therefore he needs to hit the red. and since its a touching ball, hitting the blue wasn't a foul because the white touched the red prior to the shot.
jan verhaas was right to not call a miss as a stroke had not been played, so it could not have been deemed a miss. i do think that after ronnies good fortune that john deservedly won the match.
''this means that a player can play a deliberate foul and get an advantage''
it explains the flaw of the rule and why it must be changed.
It was a foul and when it is a foul it is in the referees discretion to call a miss (then to replace the position). There is a rule that in certain situations a referee can make a judgment based on his view of the position. In this case Jan exercised this right - called a foul not foul and a miss.
Again I would recommend to watch the after match commentaries with J. Ver Haas.
The idea is to change the rule so that a player may not (if he is willing) intentionally to commit a foul while on a miss so that the other player would have to come at the table. This then means - if he commits a foul (such as touching the red in this case) during the succession of misses (at the point not physically making a shot), the opponent can choose to give the position back to the fouling player
@Valdinsh Existing rules already cover this. Nowhere in definition of miss is said that it can only happen after a stroke. No need to change rules, it was a miss already! By the way, where can I watch J. Verhaas after match commentary?
@ilyabirman: Yes the rule sais exactly this: The striker shall, to the best of his ability, endeavour to hit the ball on. If the referee considers the Rule infringed, he shall call FOUL AND A MISS unless only the Black remains on the table, or a situation exists where it is impossible to hit the ball on. In the latter case it must be assumed the striker is attempting to hit the ball on provided that he plays, directly or indirectly, in the direction of the Ball ON
To make matter easier just check out the S. Davis interview with Jan where h explains why such decision was made.
It was then as a miss when Ronnie accidentally touched the black although he did not commit a shot (that is the flaw of the rule which will be discussed). Because the white ball wasn't in the exact position (it should be be touching the red) Jan moved it as he would position, replace balls after a miss.
...I stayed for the voice
SenitMusic 2 days ago
there are chicks at these
flaggella8 4 days ago
boring......
cookiemonster1254 4 days ago
@cookiemonster1254 don't watch it then
UKMonkey 2 days ago
Comment removed
SilverAgTrainTroll 5 days ago
i also don't understand what foul....
beyondcool 5 days ago
@beyondcool I'm pretty sure as Ronnie went down to take the shot, he touched a ball and owned up to the fowl. That then left John in an awkward position of having to take a shot from an awkward position, which he wouldn't have had to do had Ronnie not fouled. In effect, the foul Ronnie committed worked in Ronnie's favour...
djadudeguy 5 days ago
@beyondcool I think he didn't hit any ball ..
teeneshverma 2 days ago
which red did ronnie foul?
aries1986 1 week ago
press 5 then 4 for 'he's found the gay'
kryo101 1 week ago
I'm African so... I'll bring vuvuzela to pool mathces
xboxing1000 1 week ago 3
Foul and a miss, John Higgins four.
TheSuperlime 1 week ago
press 4 for 'gay'
BNMaurice 1 week ago
@karimb001 i think same thing :)
Bogovi456 1 week ago
Higgins look like Hannibal Lecter
GoblinAZ 1 week ago
lol 5:04
TICALOSTOMIE 1 week ago
Comment removed
TICALOSTOMIE 1 week ago
Comment removed
TICALOSTOMIE 1 week ago
ronnie shoots straighter than any human, but he doesn't really know the rails
iralee3c 1 week ago
I'm a dinosaur, forgive me. LOL
beansterman1998 1 week ago
i could not see which red ronnie fowled... think he just gave up?
marcushooten 1 week ago
he would have got it if he had some coke
TheVidic09 1 week ago
Good example of why Snooker isn't on TV. Even though I really like the game. Just too intricate for TV.
nashs69on 2 weeks ago
@nashs69on Eurosport? of course it is on TV ...
xabun 3 days ago
7:35 FUCK THE REFERY xD
GERmaHy 2 weeks ago
i would bring a air horn to pool matches...
Quigongdefens1 2 weeks ago 52
@Quigongdefens1 Its snooker mate.
MRrHaCkZ 2 weeks ago
@Quigongdefens1 shame that its snooker then isnt it
mcdetinate 2 weeks ago
@Quigongdefens1 snooker
MrDordyReppinG2G 1 week ago
@Quigongdefens1
Or an Vuvuzela or even both ;)
xxiirraayy 1 week ago
@Quigongdefens1 That's cool, but this is a snooker match
TooStealthyy 4 days ago
@Quigongdefens1 snooker
poolmaster18 3 days ago
@Quigongdefens1 moar like a vuvuzela
h4nky93 2 days ago
@Quigongdefens1 why pool? doesnt really matter how loud its there.
surrehue333 13 hours ago
lol! if he could have just touched the red by accident and skip all that, he should have just done it from the start
OrgrisVhal 2 weeks ago
OSullivan look like Mr.bean
karimb001 2 weeks ago 73
so why does failing the black mean he got out of the miss sequence? is it because he didnt play a shot?
Gellis2009 2 weeks ago
@Gellis2009 He fouled a red by touching it. That is a foul, but no miss, since no shot has been executed. Seems like sort of a loop-hole.
Airblader 2 weeks ago
@Airblader that is one hell of a loop hole. like the commentator said, players could just pretend to move a ball to get out of a miss sequence. Crazy rule. cheers for the answer though mate
Gellis2009 2 weeks ago
@Gellis2009 Actually, they could not. If done on purpose, it can be ruled as unsportsmanlike conduct and thus lead to the loss of the frame/game. Although it would be hard to judge whether it was done on purpose or not.
Airblader 2 weeks ago
no applause for the last shot higgins' made
if it was ronnie, suck his dick immediately
milsumla 3 weeks ago
why snooker is a joke, despite its difficulty
milsumla 3 weeks ago
Mr Bean?
smitty3919 3 weeks ago
it looks like ronnie didnt do a foul he just sed it so he can get out of the situation lool
deelodon1 3 weeks ago
This is like watching cricket. What the heck is going on?
KingOfClay 3 weeks ago
ทำไมไม่ยิงดำ อะ
AAlonEBoYY 3 weeks ago
@AAlonEBoYY ยิงได้ยิงไปเเล้ว ฟ..
su3mus1cz 2 weeks ago
Ronnie:) moj mistrz:) zanim przestalem grac...:/
majkel691 3 weeks ago
What a Lovely fellow that John Higgins is, a total credit to the game.
JohnRagoon 4 weeks ago
.... i have no idea whats going on....
guitarplayer2434 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
اللهم صلّ وسلم ع نبينا محمد
سبحان الله وبحمده
سبحان الله العظيم
استغفر الله
استغفر الله
استغفر الله
Zahra071 1 month ago
not even them know the rules, and this is one of the best the british get to any sport lol bunch of declined cunts.
13vafanculo 1 month ago
خراي عليكم وعلى لعبكم
ahmadalialkhalde29 1 month ago
why am i watching snooker?
HeVoNify 1 month ago
@HeVoNify cause it´s a fucking great game :D
WeMissYouChris 1 month ago
i say if you on a color and foul on a color. you stay on the color till you hit a color simple i think doesn't matter what the foul is.
kavitup 1 month ago
7:36 fuck the referee
ForgeableGamer 1 month ago
Snooker players have always been honest, this miss rule 100% of snooker players were against. It's a horrible rule.
They've opened a can of worms in some ways. Players can deliberately foul to avoid repeating shots in these situations. Very clever!
MikkaMakkaMo0 1 month ago
esos marikas son muy tesos
yilmarxn 1 month ago
this is why snooker is gay lol
wilsh6969 1 month ago
If u commit a foul, your opponent can make you play the same shot thrice hoping for more fouls = points
939abbas 1 month ago
Can someone explain this to me? Why does the referee keep replacing it and why does he get to try again? Not trolling, genuinely curious :)
iamevildoing 1 month ago
I don't know much about snooker, can someone explain why he is allowed to keep attempting the shot? Thanks.
mikeymandem 1 month ago
@mikeymandem if the player doesnt hit the ball he intends to hit the ref calls a miss meaning isnt a good enough attempt his opponent can ask the ref to replace the ball, or he can carry on from where the balls ended up.
TONYCOV881 1 week ago
Ronnie is the all time best, keep it up.
kwadwoagyei 1 month ago
Such frames make me sad :(
Tikeslar 1 month ago
john higgins is a fucking pig cheater anyway
i dont like ronnies arrogance but higgins is a fucking twat
DisturbedV7 1 month ago
Ronnie's face at 6:28
TJB147 2 months ago
5:51... referee is touching the red ball when he is checking out the touching situation..
ouxxxxxx 3 months ago
is that should be 3 times on foul ? i was so confused. Please someone explain to me.
ewanthug 3 months ago
@ewanthug No the rule on 3 misses in a row then the frame gets given away is only if you have a clear straight path to make contact with the ball and you decide to play the shot another way. Most common when trying to nestle on a red when you are struggling to get the cue ball back to baulk
MrBlackoralive 3 months ago
@MrBlackoralive okay now i clearly understand .. thank you so much for your explanation . this is very weird situation, i never see some attempt that takes like more than six, is that refferee decision on this video? i mean when ronnie's attempt? and after ronnie then higgins,why higgins straight out to blue?is that a foul on blue?
ewanthug 3 months ago
@ewanthug Thats ok no worries. It is an odd situation. The reason the referee let it continue and take 6 attempts was because ronnie had an easy colour to hit than the brown or yellow (the blue which was a one cushion escape) but ronnie picked the harder shot to not leave a red therefore it was called a miss . The reason Higgins didn't foul is when the cue ball is touching a red, you simply have to hit the cue ball away from the red (it doesnt matter what colour ball you hit afterwards)
MrBlackoralive 3 months ago
@MrBlackoralive okay, when higgins hit the blue.. i get it! haha i see that the cue ball touch the red already! wow.. should focus on that more.. wait a minute, if player miss the ball colour after red, then the cue ball is placing back at the position when they are miss? damn. have u watch the WAR part 6 ronnie and jimmy when ronnie cue ball stuck at pink?damn miss foul4-4- and then 6!! its 3 times! different than this situation. thanks brother! i'm such an noob . :) peace from Malaysia
ewanthug 3 months ago
And yes it was the referee who decides in the end which shot is the easier and would therefore call a miss on if the referee knows ronnie isnt taking the easier shot which he could hit or get closer too at least. Its usually called a miss no matter how close you get to the object ball even if its the easiest to hit. I think only in extreme circumstances would the referee give it simply as a foul and leave the balls as they are.
MrBlackoralive 3 months ago
Who won the frame?
lennonpolo 3 months ago
CTRL+Z
CTRL+Z
CTRL+Z
cyshtoph 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
b o r i n g
MrDoable 3 months ago
weird situation occurred when someone fixed the game....
Bossiiiii 4 months ago
One of the things amateurs and non players should recognise is that playing on new cloth causes sidespin on the cueball to slide.. . meaning that playing on a new surface is a hell of a lot harder than your regular club cloth. Harsh on Ronnie here.
DaveHification 4 months ago
The 'miss' rule in snooker is lame, Ronnie rightly took advantage and deliberately fouled to gain his own advantage over an unfair rule. But the damage was already done
DaveHification 4 months ago
"I know we're in metric now. I'm a dinosaur."
jardantuan 4 months ago
reyes wouldve done this in one shot lol
katasinEX 4 months ago
why does he keep getting to retake the shot? that confuses me.
kjm5448 5 months ago
what is this???
aguirreruru 5 months ago
John Virgo: Failing to make Snooker commentary more exciting since 1994...
alanthe2 6 months ago
wait,i thought the cue ball is touching the red?if it's a touching ball,i thought u could any how u want with/without contacting any other balls at all?
michaelsiaw 7 months ago
It can't have been a foul and a miss when he touched the red, because he didn't take his shot, so he didn't miss, therefore it was only a foul, and there was no miss.
scottwlfc 8 months ago
Did Ronnie realy foul by touching a red?
Did he foul at all?
Is calling a foul a foul?
Ronnie called a foul on himself.
The video does not seem to pick it up.
If Roonnie did foul, I think it was more likely on the black..
Would you tell the ref if you touched the black?
NEWTIP 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ANNOUNCEMENT:
ANTIFANBOY1 IS ACTUALLY JOAOSNOOKERPT & JOAOES147
HIS REAL NAME IS JOAO ESTEVES DA SILVA.
HE WAS EXPOSED ON TSF THESNOOKERFORUM BY OTHER FORUM MEMBERS AND HIS IDENTITY IS NOW PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE.
trinomialtree 9 months ago
@AntiFanBoy1 ronnie cheating?, more like higgin's is the match fixing scumbag who should be banned for life.
kremmen64 10 months ago
because there wasn't a shot its a technical foul and not a miss foul. therefore he needs to hit the red. and since its a touching ball, hitting the blue wasn't a foul because the white touched the red prior to the shot.
tapuzronko 10 months ago
why this haa ~~~
MrHarith99 11 months ago
i dont understand why ronnie didnt nominate the black and just hit it against the right hand side cushion back onto the black.??
simdim48 11 months ago
@simdim48 Because if he did that he'd probably leave a red on.
GreenApple968 8 months ago
how boring is this?
tonywsmith2 11 months ago
@stevenbeattie11 and leave a red on when john is 1 Frame away from final ?
xFRAGxMOVIESx 1 year ago
tbh he could pick the cue ball up and put it anywhere he wants ... loose 4 points and gain 30000 of the other play makin fouls
xFRAGxMOVIESx 1 year ago
dam its soo cool
wesleymark95 1 year ago
wow this is so clear
Bossiiiii 1 year ago
read the sub (transcribe) @ 0:49
LOL
karma1905 1 year ago
Ironic if Higgins thinks Ronnie is a cheat
fitgirls14 1 year ago
Basically what the ref should have done was just move the red coz ronnie fouled it and let him continue the foul and miss shout as normal.
kishz 1 year ago
jan verhaas was right to not call a miss as a stroke had not been played, so it could not have been deemed a miss. i do think that after ronnies good fortune that john deservedly won the match.
BaToScAp227 2 years ago 6
@BaToScAp227, I love how people use so where no cause-effect relationships exist :-)
ilyabirman 2 years ago
@BaToScAp227 The MIss rule is a load of rubbish.
DLPBurke 3 months ago
can't he just touch a few red balls so the ref can't reposition all the balls ever again....
Bossiiiii 2 years ago
wow... i didn't finish the video when i made my comments... he did just what i suggested....
Bossiiiii 2 years ago
wtf :D
lol
HighFlyingDutchman 2 years ago
and you can't even troll your way to popularity and recognition.
pathetic person you are, eh?
trinomialtree 2 years ago 5
They should have just re-started the frame.
bazmataz 2 years ago
bigconor
listen to what the commentator says at 06:53
''this means that a player can play a deliberate foul and get an advantage''
it explains the flaw of the rule and why it must be changed.
It was a foul and when it is a foul it is in the referees discretion to call a miss (then to replace the position). There is a rule that in certain situations a referee can make a judgment based on his view of the position. In this case Jan exercised this right - called a foul not foul and a miss.
Valdinsh 2 years ago
What exactly do you think has to be changed in the rules?
ilyabirman 2 years ago
Again I would recommend to watch the after match commentaries with J. Ver Haas.
The idea is to change the rule so that a player may not (if he is willing) intentionally to commit a foul while on a miss so that the other player would have to come at the table. This then means - if he commits a foul (such as touching the red in this case) during the succession of misses (at the point not physically making a shot), the opponent can choose to give the position back to the fouling player
Valdinsh 2 years ago
the position of course being restored as it was before committing that foul.
I hope I made my statement clear enough to understand, though it might sound a bit tangly.
Valdinsh 2 years ago
@Valdinsh Existing rules already cover this. Nowhere in definition of miss is said that it can only happen after a stroke. No need to change rules, it was a miss already! By the way, where can I watch J. Verhaas after match commentary?
ilyabirman 2 years ago
@ilyabirman: Yes the rule sais exactly this: The striker shall, to the best of his ability, endeavour to hit the ball on. If the referee considers the Rule infringed, he shall call FOUL AND A MISS unless only the Black remains on the table, or a situation exists where it is impossible to hit the ball on. In the latter case it must be assumed the striker is attempting to hit the ball on provided that he plays, directly or indirectly, in the direction of the Ball ON
So he has to strike ;)
Punkpferd 1 year ago
@Valdinsh People get advantage from fluke pots all the time, but no one seems to care about sorting it out.
DLPBurke 3 months ago
Thank you very much for the HQ video upload. It would have been nice to see the whole semi of this match uploaded in this HQ
Anyhow thank you for this very interesting and 'controversial' (so to speak) frame upload.
p.s. - Jan Ver Haas ruled absolutely right. A very professional decision making. Good match as well.
Valdinsh 2 years ago
@Valdinsh if jan made the right decision why did he then move the white when it wasnt a miss? the ref cant move the balls unless theres been a miss
bigconor 2 years ago
To make matter easier just check out the S. Davis interview with Jan where h explains why such decision was made.
It was then as a miss when Ronnie accidentally touched the black although he did not commit a shot (that is the flaw of the rule which will be discussed). Because the white ball wasn't in the exact position (it should be be touching the red) Jan moved it as he would position, replace balls after a miss.
Valdinsh 2 years ago
the ref made an absolute balls of this
bigconor 2 years ago
It's easy to comment from the armchair.
musicianlaurence 2 years ago
be thankful you have no balls then, moron.
trinomialtree 2 years ago
Wonderful video! Unfortunately i haven't watched this semi-final.
NXU693 2 years ago