I heard how Jesus changed other people's lives and I wanted it too.I was a lying stealing cheating arrogant sexually immoral drug-addicted jerk.I knew I was bad and wanted to be good.I asked Jesus to take control of my life;I had made a mess of it.He came and purified my thought-life and heart.I believe the Son of God died for my sins and rose again. Understanding His love I trust Him and give Him control of my life. He transformed me into a new person.Never knew joy like this was possible.
whatever she believes she does not respect or honour to say you believe in god and jesus then to very publicly write songs of judas for example satanic messages and symolism. please she is but a pawn .
calling organized religious corporations bogus does not= does a hypocrite not make, here's why. A belief in eternal happiness after death isn't so bad, a belief that people should be killed for being gay not so godly. Such rules are the inventions of man, a god would not care which mate you choose, because in nature homosexuality occurs quite often, unless you state that these mindless beasts are actually demons in the guise of a zebra then well you need help
@ANBUspecialBlackops sure, take out the "good" bits of relegion and toss out the rest... as if every single good thing in the book comes from god, sure... having jesus as a "personal" belief is like having your own oppinion of evolution or physics. Dont do that.... not just some bits of the bible or anything else is man made, everything is = No Thing as a God
@ANBUspecialBlackops ''A belief in eternal happiness after death isn't so bad, a belief that people should be killed for being gay not so godly.'' "If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives." (Leviticus 20:13)
I'm disgusted at how bold Satan has gotten with using ppl in industry as puppets to steer those looking up to them astray.... Look.to Christ. No gps but He knows the way.... It was written tho... Religion was made to glorify man not God... Put no faith in man We should go str8 to our Father in heaven....Christianity is from aboveMan wants to be God so how long u think God will put up with this on earth.... Just know where u stand in ur heart n stand firm! Amen
@MrJetlife007 Agreed. The music industry these days have been so corrupt. You can tell who uses manipulation of mind control to impact the fans that listen. Lady Gaga is a huge example that portrays herself to be a Christ-like figure and she contradicts herself in so many ways.
@InsanityOnABunFilms Actually no she's not. It's easy for someone to believe in some parts of the bible and not others... in fact, most any christian or catholic people denounce plenty of stuff in the bible while believing in some other pieces of it. She doesn't claim to be of any set religion, she said she was brought up catholic, but she's a spiritual person, which would go to say she's not of the set catholic religion... otherwise she would say she's catholic up front.
@shooglymoogly YES SHE IS. You cannot believe some of the bible, if you do you are being worldly. You dont get to customize your morals. Morals are morals. Therefore, picking and choosing has no consistency and destroys the integrity of whatever youre choosing from. The whole Bible is truth. It is not right to support so many things God does not support, and it is especially wrong to announce your faith in some things and then say the total opposite of what truth is with the rest of your life
@InsanityOnABunFilms Ok so if the whole bible is truth... then why is it that making sacrificing animals for god is no longer practiced, or stoning adulterers to death? How about death for divorce? Wearing mixed fabrics? Eating shellfish? Any animal with cloven hooves? I highly doubt you are dealing out punishment for such things, so if you say that the bible is truth, then you my friend are the hypocrite.
@shooglymoogly Nice try but no cigar. When Jesus came and died on the cross, the new testament came into play and certain things such as sacrificing and eating different animals was no longer something required. Jesus came and bore all sin, thus making it possible for anyone who confesses their sin and believe in Him to go to heaven
@InsanityOnABunFilms Give me a break, lol, the new testament is filled with just as much horrendous bullshit as the old testament... and if we conducted the morality that it teaches, there would still be slavery, women with no rights, and witch hunts out to punish anyone who doesn't believe in the bible. That is all I have to say to you, clearly we both have our opinions on opposite ends of the spectrum, so I'm not going to waste my time anymore, lol.
My two most compelling arguements will come once anyone has attempted to answer the 5 other questions posted here. I personally feel Evolution has inexplicable loop-holes, and that the more we study the universe and learn of life the more outrageous, immature and ridiculous it will all seem. Just my humble opinion.
Hi I sent you a PM sense i feel its hard for 500 characters to give a good answer. And perhaps we will find something. I personally believe that evolution is the best explanation the best tool to we have to measure and understand biology and if there is some inexplicable loop hole... wow that sure would be exiting! There is so little we know, still so many thing not jet understood this is indeed exiting times to be alive.
@kveevelbool trust me, I struggled to pack the points in the 500 limit too. And yeah, I agree, if evolution is true, you guys are behind in understanding it. Yet the funny thing is; you sell the theory as if your selling the moon... Hehe busy finding fossils lol (sorry, hihi that was uncalled for)
I just think you guys are onto something with evolution. There is undoubtedly some science cooking up in there... but I don't think it's "evolution", its something else, possibly something greater!
@SuperWilliamLeonard And your conclutions are...? You have to give me legit reasons to sell me this so-not-plausible theory of evolution. Start off by providing great counters to my arguements, teach me something, then I will provide my best arguements against evolution. If you have sufficiently awesome answers, I will reconsider my belief system.
Never just tell anybody he/she is wrong. Its a bland statement empty of reason & logic. Makes you look foolish. Just saying...
@Sambuddy11 What the hell were you even attempting to say to me? Go speak to a scientist please, you're just killing every comment reader's brain cells with your inanity. I know you think you have a grasp on some scientific concepts and verbiage, but you do not know a damn thing of which you speak about. Your mind jumps from one thing to another believing in any rubbish people toss in your head. I'm glad you are excited to learn new things, but relax and try to actually comprehend.
The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. "Why this would occur?" is not answered by evolutionists. Proven! - It places birdie at greater danger! It stupidly goes against the N.S theory!
@Syrmata The question you answered regarding DNA was the easiest in teh bunch. ou didn't even make any further attempt to answer any of the rest!
And the fact I was able to get your fellow-evolutionists to reconsider their belief systems shouts of my knowledge in this field I don't even believe in...
I am always exited to learn things... and yes I actually do comprehend what I read, however, dispite my openness to recieve, I am also v.critical. And cannot tolerate the holes in Evolution.
7) Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell.
@kveevelbool Hey. Craig Venter was very recently able to play around with DNA, after using quite complex techniques. I was referring to the theory that lightning struck a pond which resulted in a living cell. Compared to Venter's works, the lightning theory (how evolution is assumed to have started) is a FAR-CRY! Hence; why many scientists believe its ridiculous. And since then, No scientist has created a living cell in the manner described by that lightning theory... That is my point.
Concerning the baby in mama's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain. However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent change. Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons.
True the enviorment rarly have direct influense on the chromosomes. Hovewer the eviroment decides if the set of chromosomes the baby is borne whit is favorible in the eviroment or not. Evolution is not something intelligent, the theory of evolution explains how inherited traits in a population changes from generation to generation through different processes.
5) Two NASA land rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, explored Mars. The topography shows obvious signs of past liquid rivers flowing in numerous places. The rovers have proven that water was once abundant on the surface of Mars, and a suitable atmosphere too, but they have not been able to find any signs of life or any signs of past life on the planet. The planet has had all of the conditions necessary to provide the "spark" of life according to the evolutionary theory, yet there is no life on Mars.
@kveevelbool Yes, it's cool now, there is a dangerous atmosphere now, however there is bound water and CO2 today.
Point is, there's evidence suggesting that all the requirements for life you listed were present in the planet's past. And there is further speculation that life could still be there today.
There are minerals in Mars like hematite, a mineral that forms in the presence of water. Also, there are parts in the planet that could support life very ideally. Including normal temps.
@kveevelbool Oh one other thing that puzzles me is ...if scientists believe life could have started on Mars when conditions were suitable, then why didn't the life-forms "evolve" and become more adapt to this harsh environment you described? Why can't they bear the sand-lightning, or the cool temps... is not what the evolution theory relates to according to Natural selection?
4) The f-cken starting problem I have with Evolution!!
Evolutionists just throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing. They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang" theory doesn't solve the problem either. Matter and energy have to come from somewhere. apestaartje321 + trajaen534 helped, yet no answer
@Sambuddy11 I have to agree on apestaartje321 that scientific philosophy is the place for you to start.
Your argument is a classic straw man fallacy, over simplified. watch?v=kgdDK4XMpm0 The evolution is proved to be true without the need of a "theory of everyting". But please I don´t think the comment field on youtube is the place for more in depth questions/answers. Reading more or attending classes on the subjects you are intrested in would give you much better understanding.
@kveevelbool What would help are some straight answers... not telling me that evolution is not about the cosmic. Or beating around the bush avoiding this question. Because the cosmic - origin of matter - is too linked to the theory of evolution - evolution of life - that it makes no sense to people like us, how evolutionists just neglect this part of teh theory, which pretty much renders it as INCOMPLETE.
3) There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey. An extra or loss of a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate. The defect could not be passed along to the next generation. Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible.
The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong. Scientists cannot have it both ways. The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct. Evolution lacks any scientific proof. Evolution is simply an empty theory.
@Sambuddy11 And apparently I came just in time for the 2nd law, lol.. I don't mean to be condescending, but you should try and understand these subjects before you let creationists soil your mind with this nonsense. The 2nd law of thermodynamics talks about closed systems, it has nothing meaningful to say about life on earth, let alone the whole universe, since thermodynamics doesn't account for gravity or nuclear forces.
The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed. Just saying...
@Sambuddy11 You clearly have never studied or understood evolution if you are sitting on youtube posting claims of refutation as if the scientists who do this to remain scientists everyday, could somehow have overlooked what you propose. I am no biologist but I know a few and what you espouse is absolute nonsense. Why don't you visit an "evolutionist" science blog and say these things to them? Let's see how far you get saying the stupid shit you do.
@Syrmata Heey, C'mon... good comeback. These questions are on a scale you see... from easiest to answer with an increasing amount of difficulty.
And if I know about refusal, then obviously I know and read on evolution and more specifically, DNA. See if you can give an answer for all. And BTW scientists DIDN'T OVERLOOK IT, BUT THEY IGNORED IT. Possibly thought it wasn't worth the strain. DNA fact IS DNA FACT. Nothing the smartest DNA specialist can say would change that.
So... I a few days ago, I promised some evolutionists here to go refresh my memory on evolution. And in doing so, I have re-discovered why I think evolution (by itself, no talk of the cosmic) is nonsense at some points.
Accordingly, I have removed theories I have put here that may draw attention away from the following 10 reasons why i believe evolution is... (kindly speaking) too shady for me to believe in. Please clearify where possible. If I have a misconception, please correct me. :)
That word deception... y'know, in Galileo's time, He once proclaimed to the general public that the earth orbits the sun, not the other way around - which was tought by the Church. When the church heard of this dicovery, they declared it as a "deception", called it heresy, and sent him on a life-sentence he served till the day he dropped dead.
I guess what I am conveying to you is, "if it's not written in the Bible, I won't believe a fellow Christian" :)
@RKoen2006 "You are mean she has family like you which love her you don't have to like her music"
I think you misunderstood something. I was quoting loombaron and criticizing his/her words. You should call loombaron "mean" instead. Read it once more:
@loombaron "please kill her, Im tired of this bitch"
Surely there must be dictators and serial killers higher up on your "kill list"?!?
well she is right. i believe the same thing. personally, the thing i got out of catholicism is the good morals and sense of community and understanding of tolerance. but i don't practice in any organized religion at all because i believe religion is spiritual and personal.
@helperthrope George Clooney once said that if you are a Celebrity, no1 ever questions your intelligence... Guess he was right. I mean, after seeing them (esp. actors) take roles as well-bred socialites/ librarians/ computer hackers/ teachers/ Professors/ etc and convince us of their pretend intellect, (even the ones that never graduated in college), their characters can convey a pretty persuasive image and reputation about them... we as the general public forget they are, well, dumb! lol
@Sambuddy11 Yep - in the case of the acting profession, my question has always been: "why would you take any notice of someone who earns a living by being insincere?".
@helperthrope The person may earn a living by being insincere... but even you have to admit, acting, film-making... is an art, captured.
People in paintings are insincere too. That Mona Lisa, she is not happy, and people talk of her smile and beauty as though she where sharing her true feelings with them, when she had no feelings to begin with.
Good art is universally acclaimed, and no-one cares if it is sincere or not, because ultimately, you cannot bash on something of that stature.
ROFLMFAO. This dumbass liar Sambuddy11 goes on and on with me for several posts, claiming lies. Then when I just ignore his stupid assertions, he makes me regret it. Ancient aliens, from the History channel, the channel with barely any history programming? And he wondered why I bashed him. What a fucking moron. Learn what a scientific theory is, not what the common laymen uses theory is, a guess or untested hypothesis.
@trajaen534 I read about the Ancient Alien Theory roughly the same time I read of evolution... and I said that the History Channel "examined" it. So obviously I would want to watch the programme and pick up on some further infomation I might off missed. It is noted and regarded as a scientific theory... I suppose you were still to stuck on evolution to consider possible alternatives. Personally, I still don't see how you chose to believe in a theory with no "Creation of the Universe beginning".
@Sambuddy11 Ancient aliens are not a scientific theory. There is a difference between the common use of theory and what is an established scientific theory. Evolutionary theory is already confirmed and supported by a plethora of facts, any new information on the diversity of life will be included in the theory, not replace it. The universe doesn't seem to be "created" as you would imply, and that's a different subject from evolution altogether. Do some homework.
@trajaen534 I know the "the universe being created, where the suns, planets, air, and gas came from?" is a different subject from evolution. That is my problem with it. Evolution is like the branch of a tree only answering how life formed and its diversity... the theory chopps off more important questions like how the solar-system came to be (the stem) or how the Universe sprung/ created/ whatever (the roots).
My question was how you can believe in a theory that neglects these questions?
@Sambuddy11 It's a different question, and field of study entirely,. Why do you incessantly equate the two? Evolution is only concerned with the diversity of life after it started on earth, just as economics isn't taken into account when discussing chemistry. What you should be doing is reading up on cosmology and the big bang theory, instead of already committing to a belief in a creator with no justification at all. Goddidit is not an explanation for any question, it's a dead end.
OK, "evolutionists" I've come across like starting off with teh big bang theory and spilling into evolution. See the connection? I think at some point there is a connection between economics and business, business and psycology, and that with human life, human life with biology... leading ultimately to chemistry. My humble thought is that there needs to be some viable connection to evolution and "what started earth, what life formed on".
@Sambuddy11 Um, the formation of the solar system? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Chemistry and fusion, reactions and varying conditions form the connection to earth. Then on the surface of earth, over time developing more complex organisms. Why could you not piece this together? This is taught in high school or maybe before.. and explains how things happened much better than "magic".
@Sambuddy11 lol are you serious? Thats like saying that physics isn't a respectable field of science because it doesn't adress mathematical problems. Seriously did you brain take a vacation while you wrote that?
@apestaartje321 Even you have to admit, that is different! lol :)
But seriously, if a theory is going to try crop a theory regarding the beginning and diversifying of life... it should at least come COMPLETE. Beginning of life, means begining of the solar-syatem as well. You don't see the somewhat bogus Biblical scripts starting off with "Then we created humans in our own image". God first created the worlds. And about physics - it will still be of much respectable. Just not as much.
@Sambuddy11 Well, by that logic, there are practically (or literally) no respectable scientific theories. No matter how ambitious, a scientific theory is always restricted to a certain domain. Darwin's theory did a good job of explaining the diversity of life, wich is all it tries to do. It's under no obligation to explain abiogenesis, let alone the formation of inanimate objects such as the earth.
@apestaartje321 Then I guess you see my point. There is no respectable scientific theory dating from the start-start. Which is why (and not the only reason) I am reluctant to believe in evolution.
Anyhow, yes Darwin's theory does a good job with evolution, however, it's kinda shady O.o
@Sambuddy11 Can you please read a book on evolution, instead of revealing how much you don't know anything about it. "Why Evolution is True" -by Jerry Coyne would be a good start for you. Or try "Your Inner Fish" -by Neil Shubin.
@trajaen534 I have read. And the titles of the books you suggested are bias don't you think? Instead, I read neutral books on evolution, no standpoint, just the information. And wikied it a lot. I am posting reasons why I didn't believe in evolution from my days reading about it... apparently I was cleaver then. They have nothing to do with teh cosmic. Counter them if you can. If I had a misconception, please inform me
@Sambuddy11 Well that seems like rather a strange conclusion, since those non-respectable theories are what the entire world around you is built on, and Darwin's shady(?) theory is certainly not least amongst them. I suppose you're not taking flu shots?
@apestaartje321 Lol, no. OK what I meant by Darwin's shady theory is explained further in my most recent posts on why I don't believe in evolution. (nothing to do with the cosmic) that was reason #1. I am posting on evolution itself, its nonsense at times (sorry) so please correct me if I posted a misconception
And I would rather accept a theory that tries to explain everything. But moving on, we just agreed that they are non-respectable and that is true.
@Sambuddy11 ROFL... can I ask how old you are, and try to be honest for once. Please tell me those neutral books you read on evolution. You information is always completely wrong, did you get it from those books you read? Lol.. biased books by scientists in their fields, and yet you believe what gullible believers already believed and wrote about, biased in the most extreme of ways and no evidence to back up a word of it. Also, aliens. You're really out there...
@trajaen534 Lmao, I am honest. If anything I was misinformed by YOUR kind! Books I read were "Evolution vs Creationism: An introd. - by E.C.scott + The 6th extinction.
And in all honesty, I had a really crappy time trying to find a book that presented the issue "fairly" from both points of view. And most of us are gullible when first reading on a subject because we have no intellect on it. We only become critical after learning. As for aliens, I consider everything. Open-minded. LOL
@Sambuddy11 I'll let you in on a little secret: there's no use viewing it from 'both' point of views, since academically speaking, there aren't. There's just hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed (might want to look up what that means, it makes quite the difference) scientific articles in biology, geology, physics, astronomy.... versus a handful of Christian-fundamental nutjobs who don't even have a highschool-level grasp on scientific consensus.
@apestaartje321 Exactly what i told the other guy Tre-something!! It is soooooooo hard finding a "fairly" presenting scientific book. And the book I read *Evolution vs Creationism: an intro.* might have "soiled my mind". See a misconception. So therefore I can rule out this reason. Thanks
@Sambuddy11 Yes, evidently so open your brain has fallen out. Are you referring to Eugenie Scott's books, and yet you still post untrue claims about evolution? I'd love to see where she says what you do. Otherwise, tell me where you get your information, because it's all wrong. You latch on to any fucking thing people say.. just stupid Sam, I tried to come back and talk some sense to you but you're an overwhelmingly ignorant lost cause. Just too credulous for me to take serious.
@trajaen534 Eugenie Scott. Yes the very 1. And I warned you to please correct any misconceptions. You are going to have to bear with me on this, cos I got my information from your lovely author. My reasons however are either general knowledge from another source (Like the DNA refutation) or another book (probably psuedo-science - dealing with intelligent design) that contradicts what Scott said. I am lost, I admit that, which is why I asked for you to correct me.
@Sambuddy11 I guess I can see why you would want that, and scientists want the same, but since that's not how science works.. isn't it silly to dismiss these theories just because they don't describe the full scope of things, how does that discredit their validity? I suggest you try reading about scientifc philosophy. I had a little booklet from college thats pretty short but does the job; 'philosophy of science' by Samir Osaka, you can probably download the torrent.
@apestaartje321 Thanks. will check out the booklet. You are right about dismissing a theory which isn't complete, I admit defeat there. =P
I guess I have ridiculously high expectations and standards regarding theories in general, esp. of these kinds. I don't think I wholly believe in anything to be truthfull... I wouldn't call myself Christian/ Evolutionist.. I am more Religious psuedo-science in my beliefs. The reason I dismiss evolution has more to do with what it cannot explain in its field.
@Sambuddy11 Thats ok, at least its refreshing to reply on a comment about evolution, and not immediately getting drowned in creationist BS. But seriously, scientific philosophy is the place for you to start. It examines questions like; in how far are we actually capable of knowing something? I suspect it will clear some things up in the way you look at science and knowledge in general.
@apestaartje321 Tsk, you were the first actually helpful person I came across. What you recommended sounds interesting... will start after my accounting test on Fri.
But I still have 7 more questions regarding evolution specifically. Guess will post them all then start on scientific philosophy.
@nazra7 Yeah dude! I swear when I heard of it and later saw the History Channel examine the theory... it just seems way more plausible than any other scientific explanation of our origins. Do you believe in it? It's cool if you don't..
@Sambuddy11 Nah, I love the series but many of their arguments seem illogical to me. Most of them come from the "hair guy" cant remember his name but he's the one with the crazy hair do.
The main problem I have with the theory is that they cherry pick descriptions from religious scriptures to try to argue that divine encounters are close encounters, while ignoring the cases that is not so easily attributed to extra terrestrials.
@nazra7 I see. Your point is sound. I thought about that... then, thought who in today's world can understand all parables/ laws & statutes of Religion?
All theories lack completeness. Evolution cannot explain the origins of the universe. Religions don't explain where their Gods came from. And so does the Alien theory... it works with what it can percieve as likely. Therefore, I feel that by ruling it out, I am "cheating" the theory by not giving it the same level of tolerence as the rest.
@exqwid217 I don't know, but I really don't think clothes has anything to do with that. She thinks it's fashion along with allot of other people. I don't see anything wrong with that.
@exqwid217 "Yeah you can, I mean what kind of a religious person dresses like that."
"God created man in his own image." or so it says in the bible. Reality is that people created God in their own image. LG (not Lucky Goldstar) created a god that accepts the way she dresses and you created a god that doesn't. People, who hate homosexuals, created a god that does as well and men, who feel superior to women, created a god that states that men are superior (Adam's rib).
@ssesf God created us. The Bible is filled with literate and metaphoric parables, which makes it versitile to many. You may choose a perspective, and interpret it much differently from the next person. Your conclusions will not be the same. So Biblical scholars are employed to translate it... which I feel is a mistake. And at one pont it was used as a tool of manipulation by the Catholics + Pharosees (sp?) altering the scripts and removing entire books from it.
@exqwid217 I'm sure that if a being that was powerful enough to create the universe and demands unquestioning subservience of it's creation would wear meat for a million years if it wanted to.
I've realized... some evolutionists here think religious people know 100% what evolution is. THAT IS A STUPID ASSUMPTION!
I mean, do you guys know the whole Bible / any other Holy book 100%?
So please, correct us if we have been clearly misinformed, because we just read the "Evolution for dummies" version of evolution really... Yup, just the basics from Wiki/ or a video... seriously, RELIGIOUS PEEPS DO NOT SPEND AS MUCH TIME AS YOU DO COVERING MATERIAL THEY DON'T EVEN BELIEVE IN FOR STARTERS
@Sambuddy11 Unfortunately both sides end up looking like twats but to be honest its an important thing and needs looking in to on both sides. Everybody is different. Personally I know the Bible as where I'm from its forced on us from the age of 5, so for me, I have a deep hatred for the Church for not even giving me a choice, so when I was old enough a few years back I looked up evolution and thought it was bs too but it was because I was sorta brainwashed from young, but facts are facts!
@zappzydol See, we are establishing common beliefs we have... haha :D OK but don't be so grim about never interacting with aliens in our lifetime. Who's to say they don't have the technology to visit us instead? Sorry, I'm just so exited to meet them, if they come... or have they?
There's overwhelming conclusive evidence (like structures, accounts, reports, sitings etc) that they have visited us in the past. And speculation that the bermuda triangle lights could be a portal (a.k.a black hole)
@jakec916 Thank you. Glad someone is taking not that I am not on anyones side here, just an outside observer. The BS peeps post here is, well, BS lol.
@Sambuddy11 Yeah.... you're not fooling anyone with your foolish antics or talking points. You never studied or understood evolution. It's painfully obvious you haven't quite reached an educational apex of any sort, your grammatical errors are too steadfast and plenty, use of caps and terms like 'evolutionists' demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a dishonest person in general. Next time you're on the internet, try not to shout so many lies. Use it like a library.
@trajaen534 Okay . . . first of all, People who are advocates of Evolution are called "Evolutionists". I learnt that from that place you call a library - Internet. haha, OMG my GRAMMAR is a basis for your ignorant conclusion that I am a dishonest person in general?? WTF?! And what do you mean by "Talking points"? Is this some sorta speach? WOW hehe LMAO, you are psyco! I probably know more grammar than you! I mean, I'm a novelist! + Accounting&finance masters major.. education..STFU dude =P
@Sambuddy11 No you're not, you're just another fraud in a long string of internet personalities. You're demonstrably dishonest and outright stupid. Advocates for evolution are called evolutionists by religious retards, because how is evolution an -ism? That's what I thought. Get on my level and learn something or just give it up kid. You've been rolled here by everyone and have nothing to say but broken grammar and uneducated tripe to spew.
@trajaen534 You said I was wrong to say advocates for evolution are evolutionists, insisting that is what they are not called... claiming the word does not exist. I just proved it's existence and now you are challenging why religious groups gave you that name, siting "-ism?" I AM NOT THE CREATOR OF ENGLISH, I JUST TOLD YOU WHY THE TERM EVOLUTIONISTS EXIST! + normally when someone is explaining what a word or ellipses is, they do NOT USE THE ACTUAL WORD IN THEIR EXPLANATION! read a dictionary.
@Sambuddy11 Wrong, liar. I never said the word didn't exist, show where I did or remain dishonest. You don't know what an -ism implies, but you'll use any old word that includes it? That's intelligent.. The word was invented by Christopath creatards, to belittle the theory, just like Darwinism. And wow you're fucking stupid, you didn't know what an ellipses was, I wasn't telling you what it meant, I was telling you that's what it was. You really need to learn how to read.
@trajaen534 Oh and I didn't EVER USE the word "Evolutionism"! I used "Evolutionist"... I don't care who invented -ism or why, It's a waste of time to nit-pickle every word in the english language to its source!! Geez, your so obsessed. Dude take a pill. & I know you where telling me what an ellipses was. But I was explaining your error when you used it incorrectly... do you really expect me to tell someone who doesn't know how to use an ellipses correctly the term? THAT WOULD BE STUPID
@Sambuddy11 I did look it up! A long time ago. So you can understand why I told that other user why I feel I need to rehash on it again. I know what evolution is! Or else I would be so blank on the subject, I would have no retort to your stupid allegations. I asked you my first question about evolution - to better understand your take on it - and I have few others in my interrogation... but you are beating around the bush at the first one! YOU ARE IGNORANT + VENOMOUS. And a liar. F.U
@Sambuddy11 I also don't think you know what evolution espouses. Air and gas have nothing to do with evolution, which is the diversity of life over time, not the origin of life. I think you're confused about some other terms or were mislead on the issue. The earth is not a vacuum or closed-system, as the Sun radiates does it not? You should google "talkorigins" and go to their website, browse the archives to learn a few things about evolution. It'll be the first result.
@trajaen534 Oh... and there's an error in your post. Since your all about "Grammar" and Punctuation on the Internet of all places, well, thought I should share my knowledge with you. After all, what is a Cambridge certificate in 1st Language English (A+ yaay me!) if you cannot share?
Accordingly, your first mistake is after the first word. There're 3 dots. Second "crime-gram" - that is what they're called - (refer to a dictionary) there should be full stops! (.) You need an actual library.
@Sambuddy11 ROFL it's called an ellipses you dolt. I intentionally left out more of what I was going to say. How does someone who claims knowledge of English comprehension fuck this up? You are so out of your league and once again, demonstrably stupid. Tell me, how's my ass taste?
@trajaen534 Why are we even talking about grammar? I mean... you still havn't answered my question: How can air and gas magically appear in a vacuum?
That is where evolution begins... and that is a question no evolutionist answers, and frankly, it's stupid to whole-heartedly believe in something with the begining looking shady. And NO I am not Christian, I just find it more plausible than evolution. I believe in natural selection, Adaptation... but evolution takes it to a whole new level of BS
@Sambuddy11 You don't know what evolution even is, heck you practically admitted that to another user. The grammar is about your dishonestly claiming to have some background in comprehension, when you literally lack an entire brain. Please read a book by a biologist or even wiki evolution, because you're misinformed. You haven't ever, ever, understood evolution, because you say stupid shit about it, if you were intellectually honest, you'd go look it up before posting more trash.
@trajaen534 Careful trajaen - sambuddy is 'a accountant' and a novelist aka a troll liar who acts like he knows all but continues to ask people things like how is air made in a vacuum LOL then wonders why he gets so much crap on here, when it's so obvious he's a shitter! I ll save you time and say leave Walter Mitty alone to his fantasy world he can continue to live with his made up life with a made up god
@zappzydol Lol, true story. I wish he'd just get honest with himself so he doesn't come on the internet and lie to us. Or he can stay under his bridge, stupid forever.
@zappzydol Well, you sure do know how to make a mockery of people now don't we? Tell me, how does evolution begin? Maybe I was misinformed as trajaen534 believes... AND PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND WITH ANYTHING TO DO WITH ADAPTATION/ THE BIG BANG... I want to know exactly where the universe and the gas that created the planets came from, the light, energy and water... and how that resulted in organizims... and finaly, end with how that created us. Take your time explaining...
drugs are bad.
EricRmd 13 hours ago
holy shit, this is so fucking stupid.
eternalcrumpet 1 day ago
I heard how Jesus changed other people's lives and I wanted it too.I was a lying stealing cheating arrogant sexually immoral drug-addicted jerk.I knew I was bad and wanted to be good.I asked Jesus to take control of my life;I had made a mess of it.He came and purified my thought-life and heart.I believe the Son of God died for my sins and rose again. Understanding His love I trust Him and give Him control of my life. He transformed me into a new person.Never knew joy like this was possible.
djquiz6425 1 day ago
religion and jesus are not the same thing.
coma718ny 1 day ago
WHAT THE FUCK IS WORNG WITH CHRISTIANS WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO LEARN THAT JESUS ISNT GOD ASSHOLES
Killuminater01 3 days ago
I believe in the Gaga religion *.*
UhMazeMe94 3 days ago
I sure as fuck don't care what she thinks.
AAgodhates 3 days ago
@AAgodhates lol.. but.. you clicked on the link to watch the video..
djquiz6425 1 day ago
Who cares what Lady Gaga thinks about anything?
radix3d 3 days ago
@mamamonster2011 True dat Haha
fightmastaC10 4 days ago
@IAMPontiusPilate She's dressing like Larry King, because he was interviewing her.
doublea125 5 days ago
whatever she believes she does not respect or honour to say you believe in god and jesus then to very publicly write songs of judas for example satanic messages and symolism. please she is but a pawn .
mamamonster2011 6 days ago
To be fair religion IS confusing, esp. Christianity
LatencyProblem 6 days ago
@LatencyProblem christianity was created to confuse us x
mamamonster2011 6 days ago
What's with "The Blues Brothers" clothes she is wearing?
IAMPontiusPilate 1 week ago
There is proof Jesus existed. The Romans were very good at keeping records. Whether or not he performed a bunch of magic tricks is the debate.
ibanezgeorge 1 week ago
@ibanezgeorge HAHA your a douche
adamk4747 1 week ago
@adamk4747 Lol, you're a waste of fucking sperm. Give me your address and I'll slit your scrawny little throat.
ibanezgeorge 1 week ago
i believe in jesus a personal belief
calling organized religious corporations bogus does not= does a hypocrite not make, here's why. A belief in eternal happiness after death isn't so bad, a belief that people should be killed for being gay not so godly. Such rules are the inventions of man, a god would not care which mate you choose, because in nature homosexuality occurs quite often, unless you state that these mindless beasts are actually demons in the guise of a zebra then well you need help
ANBUspecialBlackops 1 week ago 6
@ANBUspecialBlackops sure, take out the "good" bits of relegion and toss out the rest... as if every single good thing in the book comes from god, sure... having jesus as a "personal" belief is like having your own oppinion of evolution or physics. Dont do that.... not just some bits of the bible or anything else is man made, everything is = No Thing as a God
FreakyShow95 1 week ago
@FreakyShow95 as long as the government remains secular then i dont give a fuck.
ANBUspecialBlackops 1 week ago
@ANBUspecialBlackops yeah ofcourse man...
FreakyShow95 5 days ago
@ANBUspecialBlackops ''A belief in eternal happiness after death isn't so bad, a belief that people should be killed for being gay not so godly.'' "If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives." (Leviticus 20:13)
Ungodly you say?
Moh5Itachi1 5 hours ago
even Satan and his minions believed in Jesus...
sheilliam04 1 week ago
@sheilliam04 Really? They told you so?
CallMePeaceWalker 1 week ago
@CallMePeaceWalker They told me at the very least. I talk to them every night before my sexual intercourse with Satan. He has a very big member.
iWhoremonal 1 week ago
@iWhoremonal Haha, wish I could join!
CallMePeaceWalker 4 days ago
@CallMePeaceWalker ;o
iWhoremonal 4 days ago
Sad, she usually has a lot of intelligent things to say. I'm still a fan of her music.
JanusChristIsRisen 1 week ago
deaf and blind and dum and born to follow. gaga you're stupid
12amnews 1 week ago
1 2 3, there goes all my respect for her :V was hoping she'd be all cool and non-delusional but then she pulls the religion-card. Meh
HeliosMachina 1 week ago
@HeliosMachina Your respect is worth fuck all if you would retract it simply because someone claims to be (at least on some level) religious.
teachingangelstofly 1 week ago
I'm disgusted at how bold Satan has gotten with using ppl in industry as puppets to steer those looking up to them astray.... Look.to Christ. No gps but He knows the way.... It was written tho... Religion was made to glorify man not God... Put no faith in man We should go str8 to our Father in heaven....Christianity is from aboveMan wants to be God so how long u think God will put up with this on earth.... Just know where u stand in ur heart n stand firm! Amen
MrJetlife007 1 week ago
@MrJetlife007 Agreed. The music industry these days have been so corrupt. You can tell who uses manipulation of mind control to impact the fans that listen. Lady Gaga is a huge example that portrays herself to be a Christ-like figure and she contradicts herself in so many ways.
charleenxful 1 week ago
JEREMY, JEREMY, JEREMY LIN!!!
breenhill 1 week ago
She's a hypocrite
InsanityOnABunFilms 2 weeks ago 7
@InsanityOnABunFilms Actually no she's not. It's easy for someone to believe in some parts of the bible and not others... in fact, most any christian or catholic people denounce plenty of stuff in the bible while believing in some other pieces of it. She doesn't claim to be of any set religion, she said she was brought up catholic, but she's a spiritual person, which would go to say she's not of the set catholic religion... otherwise she would say she's catholic up front.
shooglymoogly 1 week ago
@shooglymoogly YES SHE IS. You cannot believe some of the bible, if you do you are being worldly. You dont get to customize your morals. Morals are morals. Therefore, picking and choosing has no consistency and destroys the integrity of whatever youre choosing from. The whole Bible is truth. It is not right to support so many things God does not support, and it is especially wrong to announce your faith in some things and then say the total opposite of what truth is with the rest of your life
InsanityOnABunFilms 1 week ago
@InsanityOnABunFilms Ok so if the whole bible is truth... then why is it that making sacrificing animals for god is no longer practiced, or stoning adulterers to death? How about death for divorce? Wearing mixed fabrics? Eating shellfish? Any animal with cloven hooves? I highly doubt you are dealing out punishment for such things, so if you say that the bible is truth, then you my friend are the hypocrite.
shooglymoogly 1 week ago
@shooglymoogly Nice try but no cigar. When Jesus came and died on the cross, the new testament came into play and certain things such as sacrificing and eating different animals was no longer something required. Jesus came and bore all sin, thus making it possible for anyone who confesses their sin and believe in Him to go to heaven
InsanityOnABunFilms 4 days ago
@InsanityOnABunFilms Give me a break, lol, the new testament is filled with just as much horrendous bullshit as the old testament... and if we conducted the morality that it teaches, there would still be slavery, women with no rights, and witch hunts out to punish anyone who doesn't believe in the bible. That is all I have to say to you, clearly we both have our opinions on opposite ends of the spectrum, so I'm not going to waste my time anymore, lol.
shooglymoogly 4 days ago
@InsanityOnABunFilms- how is she a hypocrite? haha!
MileyLeax911 4 days ago
@MileyLeax911 .....you obviously dont know anything
InsanityOnABunFilms 4 days ago
Go get some brains!
DrWitchfinderGeneral 2 weeks ago
My two most compelling arguements will come once anyone has attempted to answer the 5 other questions posted here. I personally feel Evolution has inexplicable loop-holes, and that the more we study the universe and learn of life the more outrageous, immature and ridiculous it will all seem. Just my humble opinion.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11
Hi I sent you a PM sense i feel its hard for 500 characters to give a good answer. And perhaps we will find something. I personally believe that evolution is the best explanation the best tool to we have to measure and understand biology and if there is some inexplicable loop hole... wow that sure would be exiting! There is so little we know, still so many thing not jet understood this is indeed exiting times to be alive.
kveevelbool 2 weeks ago
@kveevelbool trust me, I struggled to pack the points in the 500 limit too. And yeah, I agree, if evolution is true, you guys are behind in understanding it. Yet the funny thing is; you sell the theory as if your selling the moon... Hehe busy finding fossils lol (sorry, hihi that was uncalled for)
I just think you guys are onto something with evolution. There is undoubtedly some science cooking up in there... but I don't think it's "evolution", its something else, possibly something greater!
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Thats called being wrong my friend.
SuperWilliamLeonard 2 weeks ago
@SuperWilliamLeonard And your conclutions are...? You have to give me legit reasons to sell me this so-not-plausible theory of evolution. Start off by providing great counters to my arguements, teach me something, then I will provide my best arguements against evolution. If you have sufficiently awesome answers, I will reconsider my belief system.
Never just tell anybody he/she is wrong. Its a bland statement empty of reason & logic. Makes you look foolish. Just saying...
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 What the hell were you even attempting to say to me? Go speak to a scientist please, you're just killing every comment reader's brain cells with your inanity. I know you think you have a grasp on some scientific concepts and verbiage, but you do not know a damn thing of which you speak about. Your mind jumps from one thing to another believing in any rubbish people toss in your head. I'm glad you are excited to learn new things, but relax and try to actually comprehend.
Syrmata 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Syrmata Try answer
The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the evolutionary tree have many laughable flaws. One of the best is the thought that a bird began to evolve a wing. "Why this would occur?" is not answered by evolutionists. Proven! - It places birdie at greater danger! It stupidly goes against the N.S theory!
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Syrmata The question you answered regarding DNA was the easiest in teh bunch. ou didn't even make any further attempt to answer any of the rest!
And the fact I was able to get your fellow-evolutionists to reconsider their belief systems shouts of my knowledge in this field I don't even believe in...
I am always exited to learn things... and yes I actually do comprehend what I read, however, dispite my openness to recieve, I am also v.critical. And cannot tolerate the holes in Evolution.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Riiiiiight. Have a good time, prince.
Syrmata 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sambuddy11 Thats called being wrong my friend.
SuperWilliamLeonard 2 weeks ago
7) Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11
Not very ridiculous at all. See the work of Dr Craig Venter
kveevelbool 2 weeks ago
@kveevelbool Hey. Craig Venter was very recently able to play around with DNA, after using quite complex techniques. I was referring to the theory that lightning struck a pond which resulted in a living cell. Compared to Venter's works, the lightning theory (how evolution is assumed to have started) is a FAR-CRY! Hence; why many scientists believe its ridiculous. And since then, No scientist has created a living cell in the manner described by that lightning theory... That is my point.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
6) Human egg and sperm problem
Concerning the baby in mama's womb. Evolutionists claim environmental factors cause small changes in the offspring in the evolutionary chain. However, the environmental experience of the female cannot change the chromosomes within her eggs and cannot have any effect upon her offspring. Her body cannot go into the eggs contained within her ovaries at her birth to make an intelligent change. Females cannot be a part of the evolutionary theory for these reasons.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11
True the enviorment rarly have direct influense on the chromosomes. Hovewer the eviroment decides if the set of chromosomes the baby is borne whit is favorible in the eviroment or not. Evolution is not something intelligent, the theory of evolution explains how inherited traits in a population changes from generation to generation through different processes.
kveevelbool 2 weeks ago
5) Two NASA land rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, explored Mars. The topography shows obvious signs of past liquid rivers flowing in numerous places. The rovers have proven that water was once abundant on the surface of Mars, and a suitable atmosphere too, but they have not been able to find any signs of life or any signs of past life on the planet. The planet has had all of the conditions necessary to provide the "spark" of life according to the evolutionary theory, yet there is no life on Mars.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11
It is too col
The average surface temperature on Mars is -60 C (-73 F)
No life can exist at that temperature.
Generally life has 3 requirements
(1) warmth (meaning generally 0 C to 50 C)
(2) water (can not exist below 0 C)
(3) nutrients / food (it is unknown if Mars soil contains nutrients, but because of the low temperature, they are unavailable to life)
There is nothing about Mars that suggests it was ever any different in the past.
kveevelbool 2 weeks ago
@kveevelbool Yes, it's cool now, there is a dangerous atmosphere now, however there is bound water and CO2 today.
Point is, there's evidence suggesting that all the requirements for life you listed were present in the planet's past. And there is further speculation that life could still be there today.
There are minerals in Mars like hematite, a mineral that forms in the presence of water. Also, there are parts in the planet that could support life very ideally. Including normal temps.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kveevelbool Oh one other thing that puzzles me is ...if scientists believe life could have started on Mars when conditions were suitable, then why didn't the life-forms "evolve" and become more adapt to this harsh environment you described? Why can't they bear the sand-lightning, or the cool temps... is not what the evolution theory relates to according to Natural selection?
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
4) The f-cken starting problem I have with Evolution!!
Evolutionists just throw up their hands at the question of the origin of matter because they know something cannot evolve from nothing. They stick their heads in the sand and ignore the problem. The fact that matter exists in outrageously large quantities simply proves evolution is wrong. The "Big Bang" theory doesn't solve the problem either. Matter and energy have to come from somewhere. apestaartje321 + trajaen534 helped, yet no answer
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 I have to agree on apestaartje321 that scientific philosophy is the place for you to start.
Your argument is a classic straw man fallacy, over simplified. watch?v=kgdDK4XMpm0 The evolution is proved to be true without the need of a "theory of everyting". But please I don´t think the comment field on youtube is the place for more in depth questions/answers. Reading more or attending classes on the subjects you are intrested in would give you much better understanding.
kveevelbool 2 weeks ago
@kveevelbool What would help are some straight answers... not telling me that evolution is not about the cosmic. Or beating around the bush avoiding this question. Because the cosmic - origin of matter - is too linked to the theory of evolution - evolution of life - that it makes no sense to people like us, how evolutionists just neglect this part of teh theory, which pretty much renders it as INCOMPLETE.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
3) There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey. An extra or loss of a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate. The defect could not be passed along to the next generation. Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
2) The Science wars.
The second law of thermodynamics proves that organization cannot flow from chaos. Complex live organisms cannot rearrange themselves into an organism of a higher form as claimed by evolutionists. This is scientifically backwards according to the second law of thermodynamics that has never been proven wrong. Scientists cannot have it both ways. The second law of thermodynamics is proven to be correct. Evolution lacks any scientific proof. Evolution is simply an empty theory.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 And apparently I came just in time for the 2nd law, lol.. I don't mean to be condescending, but you should try and understand these subjects before you let creationists soil your mind with this nonsense. The 2nd law of thermodynamics talks about closed systems, it has nothing meaningful to say about life on earth, let alone the whole universe, since thermodynamics doesn't account for gravity or nuclear forces.
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
1) Biggest reason regarding Natural Selection
The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed. Just saying...
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 You clearly have never studied or understood evolution if you are sitting on youtube posting claims of refutation as if the scientists who do this to remain scientists everyday, could somehow have overlooked what you propose. I am no biologist but I know a few and what you espouse is absolute nonsense. Why don't you visit an "evolutionist" science blog and say these things to them? Let's see how far you get saying the stupid shit you do.
Syrmata 2 weeks ago
@Syrmata Heey, C'mon... good comeback. These questions are on a scale you see... from easiest to answer with an increasing amount of difficulty.
And if I know about refusal, then obviously I know and read on evolution and more specifically, DNA. See if you can give an answer for all. And BTW scientists DIDN'T OVERLOOK IT, BUT THEY IGNORED IT. Possibly thought it wasn't worth the strain. DNA fact IS DNA FACT. Nothing the smartest DNA specialist can say would change that.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
So... I a few days ago, I promised some evolutionists here to go refresh my memory on evolution. And in doing so, I have re-discovered why I think evolution (by itself, no talk of the cosmic) is nonsense at some points.
Accordingly, I have removed theories I have put here that may draw attention away from the following 10 reasons why i believe evolution is... (kindly speaking) too shady for me to believe in. Please clearify where possible. If I have a misconception, please correct me. :)
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@3Prophets1God What's an Annunaki?
That word deception... y'know, in Galileo's time, He once proclaimed to the general public that the earth orbits the sun, not the other way around - which was tought by the Church. When the church heard of this dicovery, they declared it as a "deception", called it heresy, and sent him on a life-sentence he served till the day he dropped dead.
I guess what I am conveying to you is, "if it's not written in the Bible, I won't believe a fellow Christian" :)
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@ssesf You are mean she has family like you which love her you don't have to like her music
RKoen2006 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RKoen2006 "You are mean she has family like you which love her you don't have to like her music"
I think you misunderstood something. I was quoting loombaron and criticizing his/her words. You should call loombaron "mean" instead. Read it once more:
@loombaron "please kill her, Im tired of this bitch"
Surely there must be dictators and serial killers higher up on your "kill list"?!?
ssesf 2 weeks ago
well she is right. i believe the same thing. personally, the thing i got out of catholicism is the good morals and sense of community and understanding of tolerance. but i don't practice in any organized religion at all because i believe religion is spiritual and personal.
cpett88 2 weeks ago
you know what they say about singers. they have resonance where their brains ought to be.
gspaulsson 2 weeks ago
if you believe in Jesus and not religion you are a protestant......
lilbeaveymac 2 weeks ago
Jewish languages forcing gods into those barbaric Hebrew fables is still an amazing act to childish mind.
beancube2010 2 weeks ago
Who the fuck CARES what a 'singer' thinks about anything?
Her qualifications for an opinion are ...... ??
helperthrope 2 weeks ago
@helperthrope George Clooney once said that if you are a Celebrity, no1 ever questions your intelligence... Guess he was right. I mean, after seeing them (esp. actors) take roles as well-bred socialites/ librarians/ computer hackers/ teachers/ Professors/ etc and convince us of their pretend intellect, (even the ones that never graduated in college), their characters can convey a pretty persuasive image and reputation about them... we as the general public forget they are, well, dumb! lol
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Yep - in the case of the acting profession, my question has always been: "why would you take any notice of someone who earns a living by being insincere?".
helperthrope 2 weeks ago
@helperthrope The person may earn a living by being insincere... but even you have to admit, acting, film-making... is an art, captured.
People in paintings are insincere too. That Mona Lisa, she is not happy, and people talk of her smile and beauty as though she where sharing her true feelings with them, when she had no feelings to begin with.
Good art is universally acclaimed, and no-one cares if it is sincere or not, because ultimately, you cannot bash on something of that stature.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
the drugs finaly caught up with her
TheZane2009 2 weeks ago
Gaga is fully dialed into the Illumunati.
GdaleKing 2 weeks ago
please kill her, Im tired of this bitch
loombaron 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@loombaron "please kill her, Im tired of this bitch"
Surely there must be dictators and serial killers higher up on your "kill list"?!?
ssesf 2 weeks ago
Rebecca Black's thoughts on world politics
jumper1294 2 weeks ago
ROFLMFAO. This dumbass liar Sambuddy11 goes on and on with me for several posts, claiming lies. Then when I just ignore his stupid assertions, he makes me regret it. Ancient aliens, from the History channel, the channel with barely any history programming? And he wondered why I bashed him. What a fucking moron. Learn what a scientific theory is, not what the common laymen uses theory is, a guess or untested hypothesis.
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@trajaen534 I read about the Ancient Alien Theory roughly the same time I read of evolution... and I said that the History Channel "examined" it. So obviously I would want to watch the programme and pick up on some further infomation I might off missed. It is noted and regarded as a scientific theory... I suppose you were still to stuck on evolution to consider possible alternatives. Personally, I still don't see how you chose to believe in a theory with no "Creation of the Universe beginning".
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Ancient aliens are not a scientific theory. There is a difference between the common use of theory and what is an established scientific theory. Evolutionary theory is already confirmed and supported by a plethora of facts, any new information on the diversity of life will be included in the theory, not replace it. The universe doesn't seem to be "created" as you would imply, and that's a different subject from evolution altogether. Do some homework.
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@trajaen534 I know the "the universe being created, where the suns, planets, air, and gas came from?" is a different subject from evolution. That is my problem with it. Evolution is like the branch of a tree only answering how life formed and its diversity... the theory chopps off more important questions like how the solar-system came to be (the stem) or how the Universe sprung/ created/ whatever (the roots).
My question was how you can believe in a theory that neglects these questions?
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 It's a different question, and field of study entirely,. Why do you incessantly equate the two? Evolution is only concerned with the diversity of life after it started on earth, just as economics isn't taken into account when discussing chemistry. What you should be doing is reading up on cosmology and the big bang theory, instead of already committing to a belief in a creator with no justification at all. Goddidit is not an explanation for any question, it's a dead end.
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Sorry 4 l8 reply. didn't see this.
OK, "evolutionists" I've come across like starting off with teh big bang theory and spilling into evolution. See the connection? I think at some point there is a connection between economics and business, business and psycology, and that with human life, human life with biology... leading ultimately to chemistry. My humble thought is that there needs to be some viable connection to evolution and "what started earth, what life formed on".
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Um, the formation of the solar system? I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. Chemistry and fusion, reactions and varying conditions form the connection to earth. Then on the surface of earth, over time developing more complex organisms. Why could you not piece this together? This is taught in high school or maybe before.. and explains how things happened much better than "magic".
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 lol are you serious? Thats like saying that physics isn't a respectable field of science because it doesn't adress mathematical problems. Seriously did you brain take a vacation while you wrote that?
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Even you have to admit, that is different! lol :)
But seriously, if a theory is going to try crop a theory regarding the beginning and diversifying of life... it should at least come COMPLETE. Beginning of life, means begining of the solar-syatem as well. You don't see the somewhat bogus Biblical scripts starting off with "Then we created humans in our own image". God first created the worlds. And about physics - it will still be of much respectable. Just not as much.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Well, by that logic, there are practically (or literally) no respectable scientific theories. No matter how ambitious, a scientific theory is always restricted to a certain domain. Darwin's theory did a good job of explaining the diversity of life, wich is all it tries to do. It's under no obligation to explain abiogenesis, let alone the formation of inanimate objects such as the earth.
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Then I guess you see my point. There is no respectable scientific theory dating from the start-start. Which is why (and not the only reason) I am reluctant to believe in evolution.
Anyhow, yes Darwin's theory does a good job with evolution, however, it's kinda shady O.o
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Can you please read a book on evolution, instead of revealing how much you don't know anything about it. "Why Evolution is True" -by Jerry Coyne would be a good start for you. Or try "Your Inner Fish" -by Neil Shubin.
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@trajaen534 I have read. And the titles of the books you suggested are bias don't you think? Instead, I read neutral books on evolution, no standpoint, just the information. And wikied it a lot. I am posting reasons why I didn't believe in evolution from my days reading about it... apparently I was cleaver then. They have nothing to do with teh cosmic. Counter them if you can. If I had a misconception, please inform me
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Well that seems like rather a strange conclusion, since those non-respectable theories are what the entire world around you is built on, and Darwin's shady(?) theory is certainly not least amongst them. I suppose you're not taking flu shots?
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Lol, no. OK what I meant by Darwin's shady theory is explained further in my most recent posts on why I don't believe in evolution. (nothing to do with the cosmic) that was reason #1. I am posting on evolution itself, its nonsense at times (sorry) so please correct me if I posted a misconception
And I would rather accept a theory that tries to explain everything. But moving on, we just agreed that they are non-respectable and that is true.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 ROFL... can I ask how old you are, and try to be honest for once. Please tell me those neutral books you read on evolution. You information is always completely wrong, did you get it from those books you read? Lol.. biased books by scientists in their fields, and yet you believe what gullible believers already believed and wrote about, biased in the most extreme of ways and no evidence to back up a word of it. Also, aliens. You're really out there...
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Lmao, I am honest. If anything I was misinformed by YOUR kind! Books I read were "Evolution vs Creationism: An introd. - by E.C.scott + The 6th extinction.
And in all honesty, I had a really crappy time trying to find a book that presented the issue "fairly" from both points of view. And most of us are gullible when first reading on a subject because we have no intellect on it. We only become critical after learning. As for aliens, I consider everything. Open-minded. LOL
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 I'll let you in on a little secret: there's no use viewing it from 'both' point of views, since academically speaking, there aren't. There's just hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed (might want to look up what that means, it makes quite the difference) scientific articles in biology, geology, physics, astronomy.... versus a handful of Christian-fundamental nutjobs who don't even have a highschool-level grasp on scientific consensus.
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Exactly what i told the other guy Tre-something!! It is soooooooo hard finding a "fairly" presenting scientific book. And the book I read *Evolution vs Creationism: an intro.* might have "soiled my mind". See a misconception. So therefore I can rule out this reason. Thanks
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Yes, evidently so open your brain has fallen out. Are you referring to Eugenie Scott's books, and yet you still post untrue claims about evolution? I'd love to see where she says what you do. Otherwise, tell me where you get your information, because it's all wrong. You latch on to any fucking thing people say.. just stupid Sam, I tried to come back and talk some sense to you but you're an overwhelmingly ignorant lost cause. Just too credulous for me to take serious.
trajaen534 2 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Eugenie Scott. Yes the very 1. And I warned you to please correct any misconceptions. You are going to have to bear with me on this, cos I got my information from your lovely author. My reasons however are either general knowledge from another source (Like the DNA refutation) or another book (probably psuedo-science - dealing with intelligent design) that contradicts what Scott said. I am lost, I admit that, which is why I asked for you to correct me.
+ U have 2 b open-minded!
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 I guess I can see why you would want that, and scientists want the same, but since that's not how science works.. isn't it silly to dismiss these theories just because they don't describe the full scope of things, how does that discredit their validity? I suggest you try reading about scientifc philosophy. I had a little booklet from college thats pretty short but does the job; 'philosophy of science' by Samir Osaka, you can probably download the torrent.
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Thanks. will check out the booklet. You are right about dismissing a theory which isn't complete, I admit defeat there. =P
I guess I have ridiculously high expectations and standards regarding theories in general, esp. of these kinds. I don't think I wholly believe in anything to be truthfull... I wouldn't call myself Christian/ Evolutionist.. I am more Religious psuedo-science in my beliefs. The reason I dismiss evolution has more to do with what it cannot explain in its field.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Thats ok, at least its refreshing to reply on a comment about evolution, and not immediately getting drowned in creationist BS. But seriously, scientific philosophy is the place for you to start. It examines questions like; in how far are we actually capable of knowing something? I suspect it will clear some things up in the way you look at science and knowledge in general.
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Tsk, you were the first actually helpful person I came across. What you recommended sounds interesting... will start after my accounting test on Fri.
But I still have 7 more questions regarding evolution specifically. Guess will post them all then start on scientific philosophy.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Glad I could help. I won't be around this comment board when you post all that, but feel free to send a PM. Peace.
apestaartje321 2 weeks ago
@apestaartje321 Oops on respectable... but you dig what I meant. Seriously, that was some crappy comparison. lol
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
RedSkyNord 2 weeks ago
A religious person who finds religion bogus? Yeah, she's confused.
RedSkyNord 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Ah, the Ancient Alien theory.
nazra7 3 weeks ago
@nazra7 Yeah dude! I swear when I heard of it and later saw the History Channel examine the theory... it just seems way more plausible than any other scientific explanation of our origins. Do you believe in it? It's cool if you don't..
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Nah, I love the series but many of their arguments seem illogical to me. Most of them come from the "hair guy" cant remember his name but he's the one with the crazy hair do.
The main problem I have with the theory is that they cherry pick descriptions from religious scriptures to try to argue that divine encounters are close encounters, while ignoring the cases that is not so easily attributed to extra terrestrials.
nazra7 3 weeks ago
@nazra7 I see. Your point is sound. I thought about that... then, thought who in today's world can understand all parables/ laws & statutes of Religion?
All theories lack completeness. Evolution cannot explain the origins of the universe. Religions don't explain where their Gods came from. And so does the Alien theory... it works with what it can percieve as likely. Therefore, I feel that by ruling it out, I am "cheating" the theory by not giving it the same level of tolerence as the rest.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
just fuck that bitch and put her back into the kitchen wtf
NuCasy 3 weeks ago
BAWL SHAT! She is in no way religious, I mean look at it!
exqwid217 3 weeks ago
@exqwid217 You know nothing about her, you can't judge someone by their clothes.
fancysnake1 3 weeks ago
@fancysnake1 Yeah you can, I mean what kind of a religious person dresses like that.
exqwid217 2 weeks ago
@exqwid217 I don't know, but I really don't think clothes has anything to do with that. She thinks it's fashion along with allot of other people. I don't see anything wrong with that.
fancysnake1 2 weeks ago
@exqwid217 "Yeah you can, I mean what kind of a religious person dresses like that."
"God created man in his own image." or so it says in the bible. Reality is that people created God in their own image. LG (not Lucky Goldstar) created a god that accepts the way she dresses and you created a god that doesn't. People, who hate homosexuals, created a god that does as well and men, who feel superior to women, created a god that states that men are superior (Adam's rib).
It's as simple as that.
ssesf 2 weeks ago
@ssesf God created us. The Bible is filled with literate and metaphoric parables, which makes it versitile to many. You may choose a perspective, and interpret it much differently from the next person. Your conclusions will not be the same. So Biblical scholars are employed to translate it... which I feel is a mistake. And at one pont it was used as a tool of manipulation by the Catholics + Pharosees (sp?) altering the scripts and removing entire books from it.
It's not as simple as you think.
Sambuddy11 2 weeks ago
@ssesf I see, God did created us in his own image, but im pretty sure god didn't wear the most bizarre outfits such as a dress made out meat ._.
exqwid217 1 week ago
@exqwid217 I'm sure that if a being that was powerful enough to create the universe and demands unquestioning subservience of it's creation would wear meat for a million years if it wanted to.
JanusChristIsRisen 1 week ago
Wow, that explains why she's so fucked up. TROLOLOLOL
mattdd05 3 weeks ago
I've realized... some evolutionists here think religious people know 100% what evolution is. THAT IS A STUPID ASSUMPTION!
I mean, do you guys know the whole Bible / any other Holy book 100%?
So please, correct us if we have been clearly misinformed, because we just read the "Evolution for dummies" version of evolution really... Yup, just the basics from Wiki/ or a video... seriously, RELIGIOUS PEEPS DO NOT SPEND AS MUCH TIME AS YOU DO COVERING MATERIAL THEY DON'T EVEN BELIEVE IN FOR STARTERS
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Unfortunately both sides end up looking like twats but to be honest its an important thing and needs looking in to on both sides. Everybody is different. Personally I know the Bible as where I'm from its forced on us from the age of 5, so for me, I have a deep hatred for the Church for not even giving me a choice, so when I was old enough a few years back I looked up evolution and thought it was bs too but it was because I was sorta brainwashed from young, but facts are facts!
zappzydol 3 weeks ago
@zappzydol See, we are establishing common beliefs we have... haha :D OK but don't be so grim about never interacting with aliens in our lifetime. Who's to say they don't have the technology to visit us instead? Sorry, I'm just so exited to meet them, if they come... or have they?
There's overwhelming conclusive evidence (like structures, accounts, reports, sitings etc) that they have visited us in the past. And speculation that the bermuda triangle lights could be a portal (a.k.a black hole)
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
Jesus can suck my balls
orkanen 3 weeks ago
@orkanen Pardon me? Please do not insult other peoples beliefs... THAT IS FOUL
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
LOLWHAT
ItzSamzy 3 weeks ago
Ye not catholic I'M catholic.. Your satans little whore.
blackjack7gek 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 i like you lol
jakec916 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 i like you lol you tell it how it is
jakec916 3 weeks ago
@jakec916 Thank you. Glad someone is taking not that I am not on anyones side here, just an outside observer. The BS peeps post here is, well, BS lol.
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Yeah.... you're not fooling anyone with your foolish antics or talking points. You never studied or understood evolution. It's painfully obvious you haven't quite reached an educational apex of any sort, your grammatical errors are too steadfast and plenty, use of caps and terms like 'evolutionists' demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a dishonest person in general. Next time you're on the internet, try not to shout so many lies. Use it like a library.
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Okay . . . first of all, People who are advocates of Evolution are called "Evolutionists". I learnt that from that place you call a library - Internet. haha, OMG my GRAMMAR is a basis for your ignorant conclusion that I am a dishonest person in general?? WTF?! And what do you mean by "Talking points"? Is this some sorta speach? WOW hehe LMAO, you are psyco! I probably know more grammar than you! I mean, I'm a novelist! + Accounting&finance masters major.. education..STFU dude =P
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 No you're not, you're just another fraud in a long string of internet personalities. You're demonstrably dishonest and outright stupid. Advocates for evolution are called evolutionists by religious retards, because how is evolution an -ism? That's what I thought. Get on my level and learn something or just give it up kid. You've been rolled here by everyone and have nothing to say but broken grammar and uneducated tripe to spew.
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@trajaen534 You said I was wrong to say advocates for evolution are evolutionists, insisting that is what they are not called... claiming the word does not exist. I just proved it's existence and now you are challenging why religious groups gave you that name, siting "-ism?" I AM NOT THE CREATOR OF ENGLISH, I JUST TOLD YOU WHY THE TERM EVOLUTIONISTS EXIST! + normally when someone is explaining what a word or ellipses is, they do NOT USE THE ACTUAL WORD IN THEIR EXPLANATION! read a dictionary.
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Wrong, liar. I never said the word didn't exist, show where I did or remain dishonest. You don't know what an -ism implies, but you'll use any old word that includes it? That's intelligent.. The word was invented by Christopath creatards, to belittle the theory, just like Darwinism. And wow you're fucking stupid, you didn't know what an ellipses was, I wasn't telling you what it meant, I was telling you that's what it was. You really need to learn how to read.
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Oh and I didn't EVER USE the word "Evolutionism"! I used "Evolutionist"... I don't care who invented -ism or why, It's a waste of time to nit-pickle every word in the english language to its source!! Geez, your so obsessed. Dude take a pill. & I know you where telling me what an ellipses was. But I was explaining your error when you used it incorrectly... do you really expect me to tell someone who doesn't know how to use an ellipses correctly the term? THAT WOULD BE STUPID
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 Hahahahaha! So you're just a moron, then. Never mind.
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 I did look it up! A long time ago. So you can understand why I told that other user why I feel I need to rehash on it again. I know what evolution is! Or else I would be so blank on the subject, I would have no retort to your stupid allegations. I asked you my first question about evolution - to better understand your take on it - and I have few others in my interrogation... but you are beating around the bush at the first one! YOU ARE IGNORANT + VENOMOUS. And a liar. F.U
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 I also don't think you know what evolution espouses. Air and gas have nothing to do with evolution, which is the diversity of life over time, not the origin of life. I think you're confused about some other terms or were mislead on the issue. The earth is not a vacuum or closed-system, as the Sun radiates does it not? You should google "talkorigins" and go to their website, browse the archives to learn a few things about evolution. It'll be the first result.
Syrmata 3 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Oh... and there's an error in your post. Since your all about "Grammar" and Punctuation on the Internet of all places, well, thought I should share my knowledge with you. After all, what is a Cambridge certificate in 1st Language English (A+ yaay me!) if you cannot share?
Accordingly, your first mistake is after the first word. There're 3 dots. Second "crime-gram" - that is what they're called - (refer to a dictionary) there should be full stops! (.) You need an actual library.
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 ROFL it's called an ellipses you dolt. I intentionally left out more of what I was going to say. How does someone who claims knowledge of English comprehension fuck this up? You are so out of your league and once again, demonstrably stupid. Tell me, how's my ass taste?
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Why are we even talking about grammar? I mean... you still havn't answered my question: How can air and gas magically appear in a vacuum?
That is where evolution begins... and that is a question no evolutionist answers, and frankly, it's stupid to whole-heartedly believe in something with the begining looking shady. And NO I am not Christian, I just find it more plausible than evolution. I believe in natural selection, Adaptation... but evolution takes it to a whole new level of BS
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago
@Sambuddy11 You don't know what evolution even is, heck you practically admitted that to another user. The grammar is about your dishonestly claiming to have some background in comprehension, when you literally lack an entire brain. Please read a book by a biologist or even wiki evolution, because you're misinformed. You haven't ever, ever, understood evolution, because you say stupid shit about it, if you were intellectually honest, you'd go look it up before posting more trash.
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@trajaen534 Careful trajaen - sambuddy is 'a accountant' and a novelist aka a troll liar who acts like he knows all but continues to ask people things like how is air made in a vacuum LOL then wonders why he gets so much crap on here, when it's so obvious he's a shitter! I ll save you time and say leave Walter Mitty alone to his fantasy world he can continue to live with his made up life with a made up god
zappzydol 3 weeks ago
@zappzydol Lol, true story. I wish he'd just get honest with himself so he doesn't come on the internet and lie to us. Or he can stay under his bridge, stupid forever.
trajaen534 3 weeks ago
@zappzydol Well, you sure do know how to make a mockery of people now don't we? Tell me, how does evolution begin? Maybe I was misinformed as trajaen534 believes... AND PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND WITH ANYTHING TO DO WITH ADAPTATION/ THE BIG BANG... I want to know exactly where the universe and the gas that created the planets came from, the light, energy and water... and how that resulted in organizims... and finaly, end with how that created us. Take your time explaining...
Sambuddy11 3 weeks ago