National Security Presidential Directive 51

[fukprc]

nobody cares

[bobbygnosis]

Section 14. c. calls for quarterly and annual assessment. I'm having a difficult time figuring out if these assessments are to be held before or after an emergency. That is, are these assessments to be held now - before the emergency? Or are they to happen after the emergency? If after then it seems clear that this document is for a long term declaration of an emergency. Which means that if, for whatever reason, an election were to be suspended (like the 08') that'd be it for years.

[swanngranny]

too late, dude ... too late

[bitherwack]

As far as I see it, this is the most damaging attack on America that can be conceived. Protecting the Constitution features a couple of times, but as far as I can see it, this document is the most radically damaging to the Constitution of anything. I suspect Bush signed this without even reading it.

[1tonykirk]

Check out (Google)

"Esoteric Agenda" new 02/08.

[blaster21996]

"Riddles in Stone" is the predates "esoteric Agenda"

[Mike1977a1]

We have to understand that the view of the political elite is that we are so vunerable to a terrorist attack that they think they need anti-terror laws to protect the country.

but because they are self-deceived they dont realise they are intrucing powers that will prevent internal dissent, that may dimimish their polical power.

[chewbaca1989]

Americans, you are sovereigns! Government serves us and must consult with us for any change. If not the perpetrator are subverting the Constitution. And may be traitors subject to persecution. You cannot sit by and not protest.

God Bless America

[benedictrove]

yeah, well what area we supposed to do? Our representatives are useless, protest marches get ignored. They have slowly bought up all the media until there is no real journalism left, all the information is controlled by a few. They can do whatever they want and there is nothing we can do about it except take arms against them, and they have have considerably more resources (from OUR taxes) than we do.

[3theThird]

According to this the CPCC is to be formed and run by a senior Homeland Security official of some sort. Who that would be we don't know. It's actually the new CPCC created by Homeland Security that will be running things.

We used to have an emergency government plan. This replaces all of that with this unknown CPCC as the ruling elite. Nice move Hitler.

[LadyGreenEyes964]

It still seems to me that this is only for use in the case of a serious, nation-wide threat, that would demolish the normal procedures (like what happened in the show, Jericho. Plus, there seem to be provisions that state the Constitution should still be followed. Still, there is room for abuse in far too many laws these days (such as the property seizure laws in drug cases).

[benedictrove]

yeah, well, they did 911, they'll do something bigger next time. (Unless you still think it was "al qaeda" lol)

[LadyGreenEyes964]

Until real evidence (not to be confused with the muddled reasoning that we have seen so far) says otherwise, yes, I do believe that it was Islamic terrorists that attacked us. Still, I am sure they appreciate your disbelief, since it helps their cause.

[benedictrove]

There is real evidence, but you have to read and stay awway from Fox news, which you probably can't do. Tell me: How did 4"hijacked" airliners stay for over an hour in US skies, including over the PENTAGON without being intercepted? Or even caught by security cameras at the Pentagon? Do you know what Standard Operating Procedure is for the Air Force? Probably not. People are ignorant that is why they beleive the 911 myth.

[swanngranny]

I've been almost SCREAMING the same thing since 9/11/2001!!

O.M.G. I've said it a thousand times!...since I was a CHILD I knew that the USAF controlled the skies as far as intercepting hijackings, etc....there is an SOP for hijacked planes AND for "Hurricanes" (ie, Katrina) and our country's leader is either an abysmal FAILURE or he's an OBVIOUS TRAITOR! Pick one, but ya gotta go with one or the other....there IS NO

"in-between" in this scenario.....

[sr71ablackbird]

@swanngranny i hate to say this, but this goes way back before that, this goes back to the Reagan Administration, to what is called REX (Readiness EXercise 84) of which Oliver North help to construct. The only one that got anywhere near exposing it in congress was Rep. Jack Brooks from Texas.

[Rajhoul]

Who is the artist that came up with this great peice of music ?

[PostToastie]

That would be 'Pink Floyd'. This is from the album 'Ummagumma', glad you like it.

[LadyGreenEyes964]

So??? There are plans in place to make sure that our government doesn't fall apart in case of a serious emergency/attack/whatever. What's the issue?

[PostToastie]

The issue is that the president no longer needs to include congress in the decision to declare a national emergency, and when that does happen, the president alone becomes the leader of all three branches of government and can change the constitution as (s)he desires and can postpone elections indefinitely.

[PostToastie]

Would you like to vote for president or have the president cancel the election and appoint the next president? (much like Guiliani canceled the mayoral election in New York and appointed bloomberg as the next mayor)

[lindaklase]

I used to think like you do. Rather than argue as I see so many people do I will give you a few topics to investigate if you have any interest in the above video and its content: the New World Order, the North American Union, the History of FEMA, and so much more. It's not who's right it's what's right for the US and Democracy. I truly wish there were no issue.

[LadyGreenEyes964]

Oh, I have seen a lot of it, and there is some cause for worry. However, I don't see that allowing faster decisions in case of emergency is quite the same thing. As for the NAU, I am totally against it.

[mrmcgee210]

the issue is that the president will " against the constition" rule the other two branches of government. which would make him america's first dictator

[Mooki2k6]

They were already in place. The National Emergency Act. They included the Congress. Kind of a "check and balance". Not just ME telling YOU what to do, but you also having "say so" in it. THIS puts ALL of the power/plans in the hands of the president. Bush if you like or Hillary if you don't. But that's the issue. That's what all of the fuss is about.

[lindaklase]

This is not fiction folks. Pay attention to the future under martial law.