One can't erase all change with all the results of one year\. The sad think is both sides are not thinking but are playing on emotion. It would be nice to know what is going on. This sort of stuff doesn't help.
@Undergroundhiphop1 Its also a matter of is it "runaway warming" caused by man. If you look at the facts warming is minimal & historically not outstanding. In a weaker moment Phil Jones of E Anglia agreed that
"from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming"
Scientifically there is not enough data to say there is warming.
@Undergroundhiphop1Your disinformation campaign is already being run by multi-billion dollar United Nations agencies. And you are wrong again: the oil companies are all on side for carbon credit trading systems - they are pushing it in fact. The reality is that you cannot divorce the politics from the science; when the brain dead members of the green movement cry 'conspiracy theorist' or that the "science is settled", while manipulating the temperature monitoring sites and data.
@Undergroundhiphop1 And no, it wasn't just one email, but rather a series of emails which outed global warming for the tremendous United Nations global government tax and power grab that it is. Global warming (or should we call it 'climate change' now to hide the decline in temperatures?) has been proven to be fraudulent. Not only are the models used to predict disaster dead wrong (i.e. there's still snow in the Himalayas), but its greatest advocates (like Al Gore) are caught up in scandal.
@Undergroundhiphop1 Typical. Could you answer the simple question that I pose to all of your kind - namely how does it help the world's supposed warming problem, when you advocate carbon credit trading - a scheme which exempts the biggest polluter in the world (namely China) - and send money overseas for the development of dirty energy, whilst robbing industrial production in cleaner industrialized nations in the west?
A: if global warming were real; it would get much worse under such a scheme
@Undergroundhiphop1 Not according to the University of East Anglia officials - the effort being to 'hide the decline'. Take a look at the huge climate changes which accompany coronal mass ejections from the sun - I think we have an inflated view of ourselves to believe that we could possibly compete with the sun in terms of warming, by exhaling or driving SUVs.
Irregardless, please explain how taxing clean energy burning 1st worlders & sending cash to dirty energy 3rd worlders helps.
@isocrate27 It's funny how the answer for a complex & monumental problem like global warming (if it existed) somehow always comes down to paying more taxes isn't it? I just love the carbon trading schemes endorsed by the major oil companies - the west pays money to the east (wealth redistribution) to purchase carbon offsets. The third and second world nations (hell even China is exempt) then take our carbon dollars and rev up their much dirtier, unregulated industries... meaning MORE POLLUTION!
I agree. Hijacked science in the name of greed is a sin. But I feel global cooling is truly the real deal then and now. Yet, increased vigilance is required to prevent future
Yes, again you are right. The whole argument on consensus is crazy. The only point I wish to make about the seventy's is basically, that the global cooling that was mentioned was correct then and is correct today.
@wayne487msc Well now you're making some sense - consensus isn't science. If that were the case, the earth would still be flat, for example.
Science has been hijacked in my view, and we're being sold a bill of goods which doesn't live up to its price tag. Global cooling, then global warming, then global cooling. Maybe these changes are well and truly beyond mankind's ability to alter or significantly influence, and we're just here for the ride?
"Forgotten for 35 years, the CIA report, A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems, 1974, frequently mentions a scientific acceptance of global cooling. It also reveals how most climate fears have never really left us, regardless of the underlying temperature trend."
Why would the CIA lie about a consensus on 'GLOBAL COOLING' in their report to the US government in 1974!? '
Hide the decline' - these are the words of global warming advocates the world over.
In '79, Jule Charney, formed a panel of experts: U.S. National Research Council, on climate issues. The panel stated the possible harm from GHGs must not be ignored. Global cooling, the threat of aerosols, or a possible ice age was not mentioned. Chairman of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Board, wrote in the report’s foreword he believed there was evidence to support action. A national report in the 1970s advocates urgent action to address global warming.
With respect to a Global Warming Consensus in the 70's and the Myth of the Global Cooling Consensus, check out this article: THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GlOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
b y Thomas C. Peterson, William Connolley, and John Fleck
There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age. Indeed, the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated
"Forgotten for 35 years, the CIA report, A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems, 1974, frequently mentions a scientific acceptance of global cooling. It also reveals how most climate fears have never really left us, regardless of the underlying temperature trend."
The 1970s scare was due to the reporters works not the scientists. If you look at what really was published in the journals, you will see this. They knew how to sell newspapers and magazines. The reporters were interpreting the scientific articles however they felt like.
@wayne487msc You mean of course the same reporters who are beating the drums for global warming? Come on, legitimate scientific thought was once not so controlled as it is now via the auspices of the United Nations and the IPCC. There is not consensus now on the issue of global warming, but scientists who speak out against the failed theory are ostracized and have their funding revoked. The consensus in the 1970s was global cooling - it may become so again, as the earth is cooling, not warming.
@wayne487msc [...] We have a ‘widely accepted [by the scientific community]…global cooling trend’, at least judging from Mitchell’s work in 1972; doubts about that growing in the same scientific community from 1975/1976, as per Damon and Kunen’s paper; but not early enough to prevent Newsweek from publishing its 1975 article, one that even mentions a certain Dr Murray Mitchell. That means that pieces of the global cooling puzzle do suggest that cooling was a widely-held view in the 1970s."
@wayne487msc That's nice, but your science, the science of global warming, is one of mafioso arm twisting to gain compliance & serious meddling & manipulation of the data. You continue these same tactics here - you ignore sound evidence provided by the CIA and instead, focus on much later research. In the early 70s, as per the CIA, there was 'scientific consensus' around global cooling. The global warming scam, as illumined by the intercepted emails at East Anglia & over a decade long lull.
Co2, the life gas & lagging indicator,not the enormous fire ball in the sky, is the cause of all our climate change. Yes, never mind that research has shown that plant life on land in our oceans is actually STARVED for Co2 & would gladly reduce its presence in our atmosphere. Never mind that higher levels of Co2 were present during much colder periods in the earth's history, & never mind that temperature monitoring stations have been substantially reduced in number & placed in more urban areas..
Actually, in the 70s, a few climatologist suggested global cooling, but the actual consensus was really global warming. A literature search for that time period clearly showed this. In England, the major climatologist met and declared that the effects of CO2 needed to be investigated. This, then, was a the first formal consensus for global warming.
@wayne487msc Well actually, you're incorrect. But this whole notion of 'consensus' science it an utter fallacy. The notion today, that despite over a decade absent warming that there is 'consensus' on the issue of global warming is likewise ludicrous. The very nature of science is to explore & to question established 'consensus' - like for example, the consensus that the earth is flat. With record cold temperatures around the globe, we need to question this IPCC idiocy at every opportunity.
The idea that everyone thought an ice age was coming back in the 1970s is based on a couple of magazine articles. It is not a measure of what the scientists were thinking. A search through the peer reviewed climate literature published from 1965-79 showed 7 papers predicting cooling. BUT 42 predicted warming! Learn here: ht tp://amx.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/131047.pdf (remove spaces)
It seems to me that the governments of the world have decided to run up their credit cards on the backs of the people, by invoking green taxes & by trying to shift the blame from natural climate cycles onto mankind.
Even when caught openly lying to the public, those with vested interests, namely large corporations, governments, and climatologists, continue to push for carbon trading - which would only make matters worse, if global warming were true!
I had no idea about the ice age/cooling fear that had went on in the 70's. It's amazing how similar it is to the fear mongering/alarmism that is going on today over global warming. The change of name appears to be cus they just can't perdict it either way,
"Well, we certainly looked like a bunch of assholes when the cooling trend stopped, & we looked even stuupider when the global warming emails were hacked. You know what? Fuck it! Let's call it climate change, then we'll always be right"lol
Thanks. People need to be aware that the United Nations has been planning this scare for sometime - though they were initially undecided if if the world should be too hot or too cold.
They decided on 'too hot' to promulgate their fear mongering, hoping that our enslavement would be complete by the new millennium.
Unfortunately for them, before they could strip away national sovereignty and sanity completely, the sun left its high activity phase, thus resulting in rather unfortunate cooling.
Great video....I vaguely remember hearing about global cooling when I was a kid in the 70's. But it was a real hoot to see the articles & cover of TIME!
Problem is now they are brainwashing/indoctrinating the kids which didn't happen in the 70's. I about died when my daughter who has been homeschooled up until last year came home from school to tell me all about the climate problems. She didn't believe me at first that it is all a scam....after all, her teacher said.
Public school has really become child abuse over the years. (I understand financial concerns often make it an unfortunate necessity).
In Britain, a number of parents had to take the schools to court over the indoctrination of their children, with 'An Inconvenient Truth' by Al Gore. The inconvenient truth, was that the video was riddled with rather convenient lies, and misleading data - and the court found for the parents. Hurray! One for the little guys!
EXACTLY! The earth warming and cooling happens in a natural cycle. Nothing to it.
Now should we be pumping toxic gases into the air at will. No. We should be embracing renewable power and taking care of our resources, but we should be doing this because we are responsible people and want to leave our great earth to future generations. To lie about the reason to do this is wrong.
It's funny you mention that - as a matter of fact, outside of the Co2 B.S., I am very much an environmentalist - I drive only when necessary, and in an econo-box, I recycle, I turn lights out, feel guilty about leaving the water run, absolutely refuse to litter - I'm a true environmentalist - that is to say, I care about the REAL issues facing our environment. Life gases are NOT the real issue, and it's time we refocused our priorities where they count.
Man, you defintely have talent. I hope you'll keep doin' these kinds of vids. So many people aren't aware of what's goin' on. I'll be spreading this one around. Great stuff! Take care bro!
Thank you so much. I'd like to thank my producer, myself, my lead researcher, again me over here, and my voice talent, me, me, me, me.
But most of all, I would like to thank all the little people - little people like me (but who aren't me) - who are doing the same thing I am - trying to shine a light on the rampant corruption & collusion over global warming, at high levels of government, & in the media. It's an uphill climb taking on that kind of persuasion power, but we have truth on our side.
One can't erase all change with all the results of one year\. The sad think is both sides are not thinking but are playing on emotion. It would be nice to know what is going on. This sort of stuff doesn't help.
izelatlan0478 4 days ago
love the work here
bribribri56 1 month ago
great vid man, I pissed my pants all the way through
RancheroBFT 3 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 Its also a matter of is it "runaway warming" caused by man. If you look at the facts warming is minimal & historically not outstanding. In a weaker moment Phil Jones of E Anglia agreed that
"from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming"
Scientifically there is not enough data to say there is warming.
Texmurphy51 10 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1Your disinformation campaign is already being run by multi-billion dollar United Nations agencies. And you are wrong again: the oil companies are all on side for carbon credit trading systems - they are pushing it in fact. The reality is that you cannot divorce the politics from the science; when the brain dead members of the green movement cry 'conspiracy theorist' or that the "science is settled", while manipulating the temperature monitoring sites and data.
TheSharpenedPen 11 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 And no, it wasn't just one email, but rather a series of emails which outed global warming for the tremendous United Nations global government tax and power grab that it is. Global warming (or should we call it 'climate change' now to hide the decline in temperatures?) has been proven to be fraudulent. Not only are the models used to predict disaster dead wrong (i.e. there's still snow in the Himalayas), but its greatest advocates (like Al Gore) are caught up in scandal.
TheSharpenedPen 11 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 Typical. Could you answer the simple question that I pose to all of your kind - namely how does it help the world's supposed warming problem, when you advocate carbon credit trading - a scheme which exempts the biggest polluter in the world (namely China) - and send money overseas for the development of dirty energy, whilst robbing industrial production in cleaner industrialized nations in the west?
A: if global warming were real; it would get much worse under such a scheme
TheSharpenedPen 11 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 Not according to the University of East Anglia officials - the effort being to 'hide the decline'. Take a look at the huge climate changes which accompany coronal mass ejections from the sun - I think we have an inflated view of ourselves to believe that we could possibly compete with the sun in terms of warming, by exhaling or driving SUVs.
Irregardless, please explain how taxing clean energy burning 1st worlders & sending cash to dirty energy 3rd worlders helps.
TheSharpenedPen 11 months ago
So do you guys think we should tax both cooling and warming just to make sure ? What about taxing breathing, eating, peeing and fornicating ?
isocrate27 1 year ago
@isocrate27 It's funny how the answer for a complex & monumental problem like global warming (if it existed) somehow always comes down to paying more taxes isn't it? I just love the carbon trading schemes endorsed by the major oil companies - the west pays money to the east (wealth redistribution) to purchase carbon offsets. The third and second world nations (hell even China is exempt) then take our carbon dollars and rev up their much dirtier, unregulated industries... meaning MORE POLLUTION!
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
@isocrate27 I'm sure the US Government is working on it!!!
america2revolt 1 month ago
I agree. Hijacked science in the name of greed is a sin. But I feel global cooling is truly the real deal then and now. Yet, increased vigilance is required to prevent future
BP like oil spills from destroying the oceans.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
Yes, again you are right. The whole argument on consensus is crazy. The only point I wish to make about the seventy's is basically, that the global cooling that was mentioned was correct then and is correct today.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
@wayne487msc Well now you're making some sense - consensus isn't science. If that were the case, the earth would still be flat, for example.
Science has been hijacked in my view, and we're being sold a bill of goods which doesn't live up to its price tag. Global cooling, then global warming, then global cooling. Maybe these changes are well and truly beyond mankind's ability to alter or significantly influence, and we're just here for the ride?
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
"Forgotten for 35 years, the CIA report, A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems, 1974, frequently mentions a scientific acceptance of global cooling. It also reveals how most climate fears have never really left us, regardless of the underlying temperature trend."
Why would the CIA lie about a consensus on 'GLOBAL COOLING' in their report to the US government in 1974!? '
Hide the decline' - these are the words of global warming advocates the world over.
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
In '79, Jule Charney, formed a panel of experts: U.S. National Research Council, on climate issues. The panel stated the possible harm from GHGs must not be ignored. Global cooling, the threat of aerosols, or a possible ice age was not mentioned. Chairman of the National Research Council’s Climate Research Board, wrote in the report’s foreword he believed there was evidence to support action. A national report in the 1970s advocates urgent action to address global warming.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
With respect to a Global Warming Consensus in the 70's and the Myth of the Global Cooling Consensus, check out this article: THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GlOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS
b y Thomas C. Peterson, William Connolley, and John Fleck
There was no scientific consensus in the 1970s that the Earth was headed into an imminent ice age. Indeed, the possibility of anthropogenic warming dominated
the peer-reviewed literature even then.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
"Forgotten for 35 years, the CIA report, A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems, 1974, frequently mentions a scientific acceptance of global cooling. It also reveals how most climate fears have never really left us, regardless of the underlying temperature trend."
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
The 1970s scare was due to the reporters works not the scientists. If you look at what really was published in the journals, you will see this. They knew how to sell newspapers and magazines. The reporters were interpreting the scientific articles however they felt like.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
@wayne487msc You mean of course the same reporters who are beating the drums for global warming? Come on, legitimate scientific thought was once not so controlled as it is now via the auspices of the United Nations and the IPCC. There is not consensus now on the issue of global warming, but scientists who speak out against the failed theory are ostracized and have their funding revoked. The consensus in the 1970s was global cooling - it may become so again, as the earth is cooling, not warming.
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
@wayne487msc [...] We have a ‘widely accepted [by the scientific community]…global cooling trend’, at least judging from Mitchell’s work in 1972; doubts about that growing in the same scientific community from 1975/1976, as per Damon and Kunen’s paper; but not early enough to prevent Newsweek from publishing its 1975 article, one that even mentions a certain Dr Murray Mitchell. That means that pieces of the global cooling puzzle do suggest that cooling was a widely-held view in the 1970s."
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
@wayne487msc That's nice, but your science, the science of global warming, is one of mafioso arm twisting to gain compliance & serious meddling & manipulation of the data. You continue these same tactics here - you ignore sound evidence provided by the CIA and instead, focus on much later research. In the early 70s, as per the CIA, there was 'scientific consensus' around global cooling. The global warming scam, as illumined by the intercepted emails at East Anglia & over a decade long lull.
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
Co2, the life gas & lagging indicator,not the enormous fire ball in the sky, is the cause of all our climate change. Yes, never mind that research has shown that plant life on land in our oceans is actually STARVED for Co2 & would gladly reduce its presence in our atmosphere. Never mind that higher levels of Co2 were present during much colder periods in the earth's history, & never mind that temperature monitoring stations have been substantially reduced in number & placed in more urban areas..
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
Actually, in the 70s, a few climatologist suggested global cooling, but the actual consensus was really global warming. A literature search for that time period clearly showed this. In England, the major climatologist met and declared that the effects of CO2 needed to be investigated. This, then, was a the first formal consensus for global warming.
wayne487msc 1 year ago
@wayne487msc Well actually, you're incorrect. But this whole notion of 'consensus' science it an utter fallacy. The notion today, that despite over a decade absent warming that there is 'consensus' on the issue of global warming is likewise ludicrous. The very nature of science is to explore & to question established 'consensus' - like for example, the consensus that the earth is flat. With record cold temperatures around the globe, we need to question this IPCC idiocy at every opportunity.
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The idea that everyone thought an ice age was coming back in the 1970s is based on a couple of magazine articles. It is not a measure of what the scientists were thinking. A search through the peer reviewed climate literature published from 1965-79 showed 7 papers predicting cooling. BUT 42 predicted warming! Learn here: ht tp://amx.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/131047.pdf (remove spaces)
cristop5 1 year ago
I love the sarcasm in the voice when you're reading the 1975 Newsweek Article. Funny!
madaboutpolitics 1 year ago
5/5
wwefanworld 1 year ago
Those eastern countries ARE low on food... but it's because of biofuels using all the soy and corn. Has nothing to do with warming or cooling.
bigun89 1 year ago
@bigun89 And biofuels became such a big fad because of what theory? Global warming.
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago 4
so love the video!!!!!!!
brebre2sweet09 1 year ago
@brebre2sweet09 Glad you enjoyed it.
It seems to me that the governments of the world have decided to run up their credit cards on the backs of the people, by invoking green taxes & by trying to shift the blame from natural climate cycles onto mankind.
Even when caught openly lying to the public, those with vested interests, namely large corporations, governments, and climatologists, continue to push for carbon trading - which would only make matters worse, if global warming were true!
TheSharpenedPen 1 year ago
I had no idea about the ice age/cooling fear that had went on in the 70's. It's amazing how similar it is to the fear mongering/alarmism that is going on today over global warming. The change of name appears to be cus they just can't perdict it either way,
"Well, we certainly looked like a bunch of assholes when the cooling trend stopped, & we looked even stuupider when the global warming emails were hacked. You know what? Fuck it! Let's call it climate change, then we'll always be right"lol
ValueFreedom 2 years ago
Yes, in fact I was - you may wish to review the articles yourself to confirm.
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago
Perhaps I missed something...what was the purpose of the obvious voice over anytime you came across statements of data?
WideWorldOfWisdom 2 years ago
The whole thing was voice over. Perhaps I missed something?
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago
@TheSharpenedPen Okay, a voice over of the voice over then. Places like 0:39, 2:57
WideWorldOfWisdom 2 years ago
Not even the SharpenedPen is perfect? Could be that.
I kind of like it - it mixes things up a bit, just in case you were starting to nod off :)
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago
I thought you were reading from articles?
WideWorldOfWisdom 2 years ago
Great work. Humorous and well-informed with some excellent graphics. Thank you. Soup
soupdragon42 2 years ago
Thanks. People need to be aware that the United Nations has been planning this scare for sometime - though they were initially undecided if if the world should be too hot or too cold.
They decided on 'too hot' to promulgate their fear mongering, hoping that our enslavement would be complete by the new millennium.
Unfortunately for them, before they could strip away national sovereignty and sanity completely, the sun left its high activity phase, thus resulting in rather unfortunate cooling.
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago
@TheSharpenedPen it is too hot now, too cold? It is funny, the planet just doesn't seem to cooperate with the elite, lol
marshall2411 1 year ago
Great video....I vaguely remember hearing about global cooling when I was a kid in the 70's. But it was a real hoot to see the articles & cover of TIME!
Problem is now they are brainwashing/indoctrinating the kids which didn't happen in the 70's. I about died when my daughter who has been homeschooled up until last year came home from school to tell me all about the climate problems. She didn't believe me at first that it is all a scam....after all, her teacher said.
imsailing2 2 years ago 7
Public school has really become child abuse over the years. (I understand financial concerns often make it an unfortunate necessity).
In Britain, a number of parents had to take the schools to court over the indoctrination of their children, with 'An Inconvenient Truth' by Al Gore. The inconvenient truth, was that the video was riddled with rather convenient lies, and misleading data - and the court found for the parents. Hurray! One for the little guys!
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago
EXACTLY! The earth warming and cooling happens in a natural cycle. Nothing to it.
Now should we be pumping toxic gases into the air at will. No. We should be embracing renewable power and taking care of our resources, but we should be doing this because we are responsible people and want to leave our great earth to future generations. To lie about the reason to do this is wrong.
JosiahsBackpack 2 years ago
It's funny you mention that - as a matter of fact, outside of the Co2 B.S., I am very much an environmentalist - I drive only when necessary, and in an econo-box, I recycle, I turn lights out, feel guilty about leaving the water run, absolutely refuse to litter - I'm a true environmentalist - that is to say, I care about the REAL issues facing our environment. Life gases are NOT the real issue, and it's time we refocused our priorities where they count.
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago
Man, you defintely have talent. I hope you'll keep doin' these kinds of vids. So many people aren't aware of what's goin' on. I'll be spreading this one around. Great stuff! Take care bro!
veritasfiles 2 years ago
Thank you so much. I'd like to thank my producer, myself, my lead researcher, again me over here, and my voice talent, me, me, me, me.
But most of all, I would like to thank all the little people - little people like me (but who aren't me) - who are doing the same thing I am - trying to shine a light on the rampant corruption & collusion over global warming, at high levels of government, & in the media. It's an uphill climb taking on that kind of persuasion power, but we have truth on our side.
TheSharpenedPen 2 years ago