Once again the Unions, instruments of the bourgeoisie quell the workers revolt and what would have been the international revolution. Reforms are Chloroform! Revolution is locomotive!
@JRF1961 i don't think usa can teach france on crimes, and the contrary is true as well: we both share blood on our hands (Orange Agent, Tortures in Algeria= same shit)
it should have been the new french revolution that would have change the world for the second time...but capitalism is to powerfulll than every other social system in the past
Depending on what you mean by driving force, I feel that the Situationists didn't start this by any means, but they were a large influence. The Poverty of Student Life had a huge impact on the university and Veneigem's quotes from The Revolution of Everyday life where found painted on walls across Paris.
Granted, conditions in general in France and the world was very influential, but I think the SI inspired it.
I would say everything good and important about this historic moment came from the SI. Yes, the uprising failed, but the fact that it did was mostly do to the inability of the mass to see what was happening and what was possible. Had they been more aware of the SI critique and solutions, maybe we would all be living in a very different world.
Have people become too complacent with modern living? Have people forgotten the tyranny of subjugation to a king? Have people forgotten the horrors of slavery? Will they wake up before it is too late?
There are many concepts that the crude, insulting and unoriginal Wraith23 fails to grasp.
1. Monopoly capital in it's most advanced stage; imperialism contradicts "free" competition between capitalist enterprises and nation states leading to sporadic economic crisis
2. The concept of a state - having absolute control over working people is only compatible with Facism; the preferred or even default political system that capitalism falls seeks to implement when social democracy fails. Under the communism of Eastern Europe, despite it's corruption and inefficiencies it relied on a limited form of workers control; albeit one that was very bureaucratic
3. the Wraith also fails to understand the historical and political context of 1968, when the Maoists were influential precisely because of the failures of the French Communist Party. However they were not the only tendency in the protest movement and certainly not the only socialists. Their popularity was derived by their tenacity and militancy; the horrors of the cultural revolution in China had not been fully realised.
The inspiration for '68 would have been the likes of Malatesta, Kropotkin, Bakunin, not authoritarians like Mao."
Yet, like typical marxist hypocrites, socialists were cheering for "chairman Mao".... pathetic
"There's many monopolies in capitalism."
There cant be monopolies in the free market because no good or service is exclusive of one business, unlike the absolute control of the socialist state over the economy and production.
Leftist are not the problem, it the gaps that capitalism leaves between the poor, middle class, and the elites who sometimes control a lot of a certain sector of society like the economy in recent times,
1968 proved that in the advanced capitalist countries the working class were not content with the consumerist society of late monopoly capitalism... which is now in serious crisis. Viva lá revolucion!
I agree with Pasolini, your DARLING homo commie director. The kids on the Left Bank were spoiled brats who were putting the cops, humbly paid civil servants, in anger by their violence. Did you know that Pasolini was of that opinion? No, obviously not. CAPITALISM FOREVER. LONG LIVE SARKOZY.
i can't believe it that you tube readers gave the thumps down for a comment saying fight the NWO is there so many elitist/zionist/neocons in here? cause NO one else in his right mind can possibly want to be the chipped subhuman in the NWO anyway sarkozy what i heard on the net maybe you tube don't remember he is Not French but half greek half jew n a high ramking mossad agent? which i find that a little hard to believe but who knows he is very pro NWO
That's because no one takes nutjob conspiracies seriously.
May '68 was an anarchist uprising in response to capitalism. There is no conspiracy at work here, just sheer economics against the bearers of labour. Leave the NWO shite for your lizard videos, you fucking fruitloop!
What a fucking knobhead this person is. The inspiration for '68 would have been the likes of Malatesta, Kropotkin, Bakunin, not authoritarians like Mao. Anarchism by virtue is opposed to hierarchy, you dope.
There's many monopolies in capitalism. Wealth, power and violence. None of them can be outright contested by the mass working class.
Social theory? It's economic theory, the diametric opposite, you fucking moron.
You don't know your arse from your elbow. Go back to bed.
All states currently on the planet, whether they claim to be socialist or not, hold those monopolies, with their military and police force. Imagine that, even in democratic capitalism.
Not sure what you're about on, I don't believe there should be coercion with voluntary association. Regardless, this has fuck all to do with the fact that people are powerless in the here and now.
Marxist class is determined by relationship to capital. There is nothing sociological about it at all.
It was the French government who gave these socialists a voice. When forced to choose between dealing with commies and dealing with anarchists, authoritarians will choose the commies. What I'm getting at is that you can't attribute these events entirely to socialists. Anarchists claim May, 1968 as well, and it should be noted that the unions and socialist parties only grudgingly marched with anarchists.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The 68 riots did not have a sense of unity. merly exstremist leftist who wanted an utopian society brought chaos onto the streets of paris in fact De Gualle who the riotors hated was elected with a majority vote...
Well Marxism and agency don't go very well together for one thing. 68 was an expression of immediacy and the power of spontaneity something that dialectic ridden marxism could never understand. Beyond that Foucault was always more incised by Nietzsche anyway.
people have explained to me that the events of may 1968 inspired michel foucault to part with marxism. it seems to me that the strikes and protests were fairly successful- so i'm wondering if anyone can elaborate on why these events would have caused his shift
I don't think too many people involved in the events thought the outcome was a success, accept for the labor unions and the official communist party. What seemed to be happening was the beginning of a true revolution, but what happened was simply a few more reforms. Lots of radicals felt betrayed by the unions and the communist party for conceding to the government in exchange for some minor pay raises and such.
i think it caused him to reconsider the parameters of disciplinary power - as the 68 revolts were against both soviet and capitalist regimes. i think also it is what inspired his tepid sense of what is to be done, so to speak, as the entire point was some sort of autonomous and direct composition of the social body, foucault wouldnt want to administer any official prescriptions... there is an interview he did with some students/workers around this period that covers it better.
Greetings from Spain and thank you so much OttOmOlOtOv for this rare document that brings me back so beautiful memories from the time we wanted to change the World. When is the next revolution? C´mon, be quick guys! I am getting old and need to live another one before I die, hehehe :)
My favorite graffiti: "If God existed it would be necessary to abolish him."
Shit, I want that statement on a t-shirt (original, I know). I've actually seen people wearing shirts with hammers and sickles superimposed over Hillary's face. As a Marxist I'm pretty offended.
By the way, I was responding to "Hilary Clinton is no more of a marxist than i'm a half elephant half duckbilled platipus!." My comment doesn't seem to be appearing in the right place...
You ommitted the extremely important events of several major corporations being taken over and run by their workers. They were doing fine too. But the communists flipped out that this would make them lose their party power and pushed the workers to accept improved working conditions and salaries. The communist party didn't really want the people to control the economy democratically along with the capitalists.
The PCF eventually chose to oppose the protestors because they were considered to be anarchist-leaning rather than Marxist-Leninist. The PCF was probably also upset that they couldn't control that "rabble", convinced that they should be the true vanguard.
I disagree with the PCF's policy, but don't approve of distortion.
the situationists were only a couple of people, despite the romanticisation of them they had little bearing on the struggles in 68 (as good as they're writings are) this is confirmed by Henri Lefebvre and others, and also it forgets that the general strike involved 12 million workers, it was that that shook the system!
In Stuart Christie's autobiography he states that the Situationists had no real influence on the events in Paris, according to his friends Daniel Cohn-Bendit and Jean Pierre Duteuil who were two of the major players in the events. Thats probably why they are not mentioned - they were influential AFTER the events but not during, it seems.
Yes, I mentioned that in the description. However, I have yet to find any other video dealing with the May 1968 events (at least not in a short conventional manner like this). The reason behind the ommision of Situationist influence may be that the two short documentaries used to put this video together were mainly focused on the cinema, media and filmmakers of the time.
There was no love lost between the Situationists and most contemporary filmmakers, such as Godard. So it is not too suprising to see a bias toward the cinema/media influence on the events rather than on the more overt and important influence of the Situationist International. I recommend anyone interested in May 1968 (or radical action and revolution in general) to read the texts mentioned in the video description (most of the stuff can be read online).
nobody notice that these filthy leftists made Pol Pot when Saloth was a student in Paris
trifulquita15 13 hours ago
this video is very educational...taught me the history of paris as well as their culture....
iLOVENATURE2011 1 month ago
May 1968 = #Occupyeverywhere
ParisianColour 3 months ago 6
8:30 Robert Hughes?
funktrane 3 months ago
Once again the Unions, instruments of the bourgeoisie quell the workers revolt and what would have been the international revolution. Reforms are Chloroform! Revolution is locomotive!
4500jas 5 months ago
thanks for this - what documentaries did you get the clips from?
elephantstone222 7 months ago
Fucking Frogs, How soon they forget their own crimes an Algeria and Vietnam!!!!
JRF1961 9 months ago
@JRF1961 i don't think usa can teach france on crimes, and the contrary is true as well: we both share blood on our hands (Orange Agent, Tortures in Algeria= same shit)
GhibliOriginals 2 months ago
Time for the revival of anarchy!
GodOfTheInternets 10 months ago
I heard that those maoist and marxist from 1968 riots today are right winger,and the frech communist party don't even reach 5 % in elections ahhaa
folladordeprostis 10 months ago
Egypt 2011 shows how it should be done. France 68 was a self-indulgent talkfest run by spoilt kids.
fremsley001 11 months ago
Old farts will never get over the '60s will they?
relax4007 1 year ago
Read Lipstick Traces. Please....I am reading it now...it is brilliant
MrFlashBazbo 1 year ago
it should have been the new french revolution that would have change the world for the second time...but capitalism is to powerfulll than every other social system in the past
sebidelpi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
R
E
V
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
kleidi10 2 years ago
Thank you for this video and the nice quotes on the rights ^^.
Very inspiring, it's about time for another revolution, it's that or war I'm afraid.
Rimber6 2 years ago 3
jews
batalion666 2 years ago
Is my worth in this society so entangled with oppression that if I choose something else, no matter its substance, that I shall be blugeoned?
rolpho 2 years ago
The Situationists were not at all a driving force. Do some research, please.
dougjnesbitt 2 years ago
dougjnesbitt
Depending on what you mean by driving force, I feel that the Situationists didn't start this by any means, but they were a large influence. The Poverty of Student Life had a huge impact on the university and Veneigem's quotes from The Revolution of Everyday life where found painted on walls across Paris.
Granted, conditions in general in France and the world was very influential, but I think the SI inspired it.
LovexandxRage 2 years ago
Well, at least 90% of the graffiti was directly from Situationists texts.
OttOmOlOtOv 2 years ago
I would say everything good and important about this historic moment came from the SI. Yes, the uprising failed, but the fact that it did was mostly do to the inability of the mass to see what was happening and what was possible. Had they been more aware of the SI critique and solutions, maybe we would all be living in a very different world.
OttOmOlOtOv 2 years ago 2
@dougjnesbitt
You're the one that needs to do the research
streetfightspdx 1 year ago 2
@dougjnesbitt
If you so some research yourself you will see how the SI was very influential.
piemiret 1 year ago
The reforms were truly chloroform.
NEDM1991 2 years ago
The seeds of the collapse of 2009 was sewn in May 1968.
fomastephanovitch 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Have people become too complacent with modern living? Have people forgotten the tyranny of subjugation to a king? Have people forgotten the horrors of slavery? Will they wake up before it is too late?
thomaspainereturns. net
LibertyAndLove1776 2 years ago
There are many concepts that the crude, insulting and unoriginal Wraith23 fails to grasp.
1. Monopoly capital in it's most advanced stage; imperialism contradicts "free" competition between capitalist enterprises and nation states leading to sporadic economic crisis
sideshowbobcat 2 years ago
May 68 a month that will live in infamy!
Wraith23 2 years ago
2. The concept of a state - having absolute control over working people is only compatible with Facism; the preferred or even default political system that capitalism falls seeks to implement when social democracy fails. Under the communism of Eastern Europe, despite it's corruption and inefficiencies it relied on a limited form of workers control; albeit one that was very bureaucratic
sideshowbobcat 2 years ago
Comment removed
Wraith23 2 years ago
"You don't know your arse from your elbow. Go back to bed. "
Next time don't try to debate a libertarian, we are too smart for marxist morons like you.
Wraith23 2 years ago
3. the Wraith also fails to understand the historical and political context of 1968, when the Maoists were influential precisely because of the failures of the French Communist Party. However they were not the only tendency in the protest movement and certainly not the only socialists. Their popularity was derived by their tenacity and militancy; the horrors of the cultural revolution in China had not been fully realised.
sideshowbobcat 2 years ago
The inspiration for '68 would have been the likes of Malatesta, Kropotkin, Bakunin, not authoritarians like Mao."
Yet, like typical marxist hypocrites, socialists were cheering for "chairman Mao".... pathetic
"There's many monopolies in capitalism."
There cant be monopolies in the free market because no good or service is exclusive of one business, unlike the absolute control of the socialist state over the economy and production.
Wraith23 2 years ago
Leftist are not the problem, it the gaps that capitalism leaves between the poor, middle class, and the elites who sometimes control a lot of a certain sector of society like the economy in recent times,
BronzeSultan 2 years ago
1968 proved that in the advanced capitalist countries the working class were not content with the consumerist society of late monopoly capitalism... which is now in serious crisis. Viva lá revolucion!
sideshowbobcat 2 years ago
1968 proved that stupid people does stupid things.
There are no monopolies in the free market capitalism. Only monopolies in the state.
And the stupid marxist social theory of class struggle is a joke.
Liberty rules!
Wraith23 2 years ago
D ...anger
yaknbo 2 years ago
I agree with Pasolini, your DARLING homo commie director. The kids on the Left Bank were spoiled brats who were putting the cops, humbly paid civil servants, in anger by their violence. Did you know that Pasolini was of that opinion? No, obviously not. CAPITALISM FOREVER. LONG LIVE SARKOZY.
yaknbo 2 years ago
what is this idiotic fetish the french have with communism they are spoiled marxism never produced anything for anyone but a handfull of party elites
the working classes were enslaved and impoverished
these kids and major portions of european society are spoiled children
marxism are the opite of the intellectual class
billyysands 2 years ago
"Bullets for your youth, money for your bank!"
Alexandra041908 2 years ago
i can't believe it that you tube readers gave the thumps down for a comment saying fight the NWO is there so many elitist/zionist/neocons in here? cause NO one else in his right mind can possibly want to be the chipped subhuman in the NWO anyway sarkozy what i heard on the net maybe you tube don't remember he is Not French but half greek half jew n a high ramking mossad agent? which i find that a little hard to believe but who knows he is very pro NWO
polygamous1 2 years ago
That's because no one takes nutjob conspiracies seriously.
May '68 was an anarchist uprising in response to capitalism. There is no conspiracy at work here, just sheer economics against the bearers of labour. Leave the NWO shite for your lizard videos, you fucking fruitloop!
DANxTHExRED 2 years ago
Mao Tse Tung was an inspirational leader for these socialist assholes..... thats pretty much says it all.
Wraith23 2 years ago
What a fucking knobhead this person is. The inspiration for '68 would have been the likes of Malatesta, Kropotkin, Bakunin, not authoritarians like Mao. Anarchism by virtue is opposed to hierarchy, you dope.
There's many monopolies in capitalism. Wealth, power and violence. None of them can be outright contested by the mass working class.
Social theory? It's economic theory, the diametric opposite, you fucking moron.
You don't know your arse from your elbow. Go back to bed.
DANxTHExRED 2 years ago
"Wealth, power and violence"
The only monopoly ever created that holds those 3 were the totalitarian socialist states.
"None of them can be outright contested by the mass working class. "
You keep with that marxist nonsense, there cant be coercion with voluntary association
"Social theory? It's economic theory, the diametric opposite"
Have you even read Marx?
Marx wasn't an economist, he was a philosopher, thats it.
His absurd conclusions were derived from sociological observations.
Wraith23 2 years ago
All states currently on the planet, whether they claim to be socialist or not, hold those monopolies, with their military and police force. Imagine that, even in democratic capitalism.
Not sure what you're about on, I don't believe there should be coercion with voluntary association. Regardless, this has fuck all to do with the fact that people are powerless in the here and now.
Marxist class is determined by relationship to capital. There is nothing sociological about it at all.
DANxTHExRED 2 years ago
Listen wee lad, you're a gobshite who doesn't know half the words you use, nor understand the concepts you try to grasp.
The only thing you do have plenty of, is straw. How would you have any arguments without it?
DANxTHExRED 2 years ago
It was the French government who gave these socialists a voice. When forced to choose between dealing with commies and dealing with anarchists, authoritarians will choose the commies. What I'm getting at is that you can't attribute these events entirely to socialists. Anarchists claim May, 1968 as well, and it should be noted that the unions and socialist parties only grudgingly marched with anarchists.
kaosstar 2 years ago
OttOmOlOtOv, Thanks so much for this great post. Do you have additional information about the original source of this video?
ajsqueakywheel 2 years ago
keep on fighting the nwo!
tmprogram 3 years ago
Reformist demostrates, revolutionaries take arms...
Gusty85 3 years ago 3
De Gaulle was re-elected however he resigned the following year, the social consequences of the riots are undeniable
willowakatrevor 3 years ago
I was born in 1968
the '68 guns will never die...
trumpettelly 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
next jewish quasirebellion
batalion666 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The 68 riots did not have a sense of unity. merly exstremist leftist who wanted an utopian society brought chaos onto the streets of paris in fact De Gualle who the riotors hated was elected with a majority vote...
supcool76 3 years ago
here is what we are talking about.
vaginyabelle 3 years ago
in tsechoslovakia they fought for their lives
diadorim1234 3 years ago
The unions could easily have brought down the government. Bloody Soviet influence fucked it up.
MarxBakuninMe 3 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
revolution devours her own children
veronicadredd22 3 years ago
Long live Guy Debord and the Situationalists.
specticality 3 years ago 4
whats the song at 38 sec
VWC1904 3 years ago
Well Marxism and agency don't go very well together for one thing. 68 was an expression of immediacy and the power of spontaneity something that dialectic ridden marxism could never understand. Beyond that Foucault was always more incised by Nietzsche anyway.
Vice81 3 years ago
people have explained to me that the events of may 1968 inspired michel foucault to part with marxism. it seems to me that the strikes and protests were fairly successful- so i'm wondering if anyone can elaborate on why these events would have caused his shift
criticaljunkie 3 years ago
they didn't end capitalism
Egorend 3 years ago
I don't think too many people involved in the events thought the outcome was a success, accept for the labor unions and the official communist party. What seemed to be happening was the beginning of a true revolution, but what happened was simply a few more reforms. Lots of radicals felt betrayed by the unions and the communist party for conceding to the government in exchange for some minor pay raises and such.
OttOmOlOtOv 3 years ago
i think it caused him to reconsider the parameters of disciplinary power - as the 68 revolts were against both soviet and capitalist regimes. i think also it is what inspired his tepid sense of what is to be done, so to speak, as the entire point was some sort of autonomous and direct composition of the social body, foucault wouldnt want to administer any official prescriptions... there is an interview he did with some students/workers around this period that covers it better.
plutoohno 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video lolz, my names Sarah, im feelin n0rty and h0rn3y if any guyz wana chat im usually on
___ FriendlyFlirts..dot..COM ___ my username there is Sarah-stugycvr chat soon ;)
gret7 3 years ago
Could i just ask when this documentary was broadcast and on which channel?
ottocle 3 years ago
It was never broadcast. I put together the video from 2 sources, both extras from the DVD of Bertolucci's The Dreamers.
I certainly wish this kind of information was broadcast on mainstream channels though.
OttOmOlOtOv 3 years ago
demos, dany le rouge, solidarität, genralstreik und unter dem pflaster der strand...
uglyslacker 3 years ago
1968-2008
Too many years have gone by!
We need a new revolution!
Together we can change the world!
Socialist1917 3 years ago 21
Thanks for posting this comrade.
nixxifocal 3 years ago 3
Greetings from Spain and thank you so much OttOmOlOtOv for this rare document that brings me back so beautiful memories from the time we wanted to change the World. When is the next revolution? C´mon, be quick guys! I am getting old and need to live another one before I die, hehehe :)
My favorite graffiti: "If God existed it would be necessary to abolish him."
Love & peace,
Francisco
Spainiswonderful 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Marxist propaganda..lots of that in today's America, see Hillary Clinton.
AcePilot101 4 years ago
Hilary Clinton is no more of a marxist than i'm a half elephant half duckbilled platipus!
didz83 3 years ago 6
Shit, I want that statement on a t-shirt (original, I know). I've actually seen people wearing shirts with hammers and sickles superimposed over Hillary's face. As a Marxist I'm pretty offended.
Maldororisdead 3 years ago 3
By the way, I was responding to "Hilary Clinton is no more of a marxist than i'm a half elephant half duckbilled platipus!." My comment doesn't seem to be appearing in the right place...
Maldororisdead 3 years ago
Im marxist and I think its kinda funny.
luka55555 3 years ago
where did you obtain the video from?
wootiness 4 years ago
it's one of the extras on he dvd of Bertolucci's film "The Dreamers"
eyeswideshut75 4 years ago 3
To tmurph12345 Tax the rich feed the poor, bring it on home, "Stop the War"!Now!
bohemiastudios 4 years ago
we dont need this to be the sixties! lets start our own damn revolution
tmurph12345 4 years ago 22
yes, please go ahead. Ohh, and when the rest of us who are not 'class-conscious' please do not club us over the head and tell us what we want.
pizzaslut90210 4 years ago
You ommitted the extremely important events of several major corporations being taken over and run by their workers. They were doing fine too. But the communists flipped out that this would make them lose their party power and pushed the workers to accept improved working conditions and salaries. The communist party didn't really want the people to control the economy democratically along with the capitalists.
Octavio99999 4 years ago
They were doing fine? Bullshit.
RudyRules 4 years ago
The PCF eventually chose to oppose the protestors because they were considered to be anarchist-leaning rather than Marxist-Leninist. The PCF was probably also upset that they couldn't control that "rabble", convinced that they should be the true vanguard.
I disagree with the PCF's policy, but don't approve of distortion.
BrezhnevIsMyCoPilot 4 years ago 2
Amazing.
anarchoandpeace 4 years ago
D'accord
wildbillcleveland 4 years ago
I wish it was the sixties.
TrystanCJ 4 years ago 3
are you kidding me??? do you want to be sent to south east asia to fight the viet cong.
daveibukun 4 years ago
the situationists were only a couple of people, despite the romanticisation of them they had little bearing on the struggles in 68 (as good as they're writings are) this is confirmed by Henri Lefebvre and others, and also it forgets that the general strike involved 12 million workers, it was that that shook the system!
noeldouglas 4 years ago
you should not be suprised by the use of force by the state; towards anything that the state feels threatened by.
SocialForces 5 years ago
In Stuart Christie's autobiography he states that the Situationists had no real influence on the events in Paris, according to his friends Daniel Cohn-Bendit and Jean Pierre Duteuil who were two of the major players in the events. Thats probably why they are not mentioned - they were influential AFTER the events but not during, it seems.
conductor71 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm not suprised at that type of retoric coming from the leftists losers you mentioned. No leftists ever had near the originality of the situs.
Vice81 3 years ago
theres a sleeping cop inside all of us, he must be killed.
siadbarrbar 5 years ago 4
Fascinating... thanks for this, I wouldn't have known about this otherwise.
Wrayer 5 years ago
interesting, but no mention of Situationist agitation, which many see as having greatly influenced May '68.
scumbauggio 5 years ago
Yes, I mentioned that in the description. However, I have yet to find any other video dealing with the May 1968 events (at least not in a short conventional manner like this). The reason behind the ommision of Situationist influence may be that the two short documentaries used to put this video together were mainly focused on the cinema, media and filmmakers of the time.
OttOmOlOtOv 5 years ago
There was no love lost between the Situationists and most contemporary filmmakers, such as Godard. So it is not too suprising to see a bias toward the cinema/media influence on the events rather than on the more overt and important influence of the Situationist International. I recommend anyone interested in May 1968 (or radical action and revolution in general) to read the texts mentioned in the video description (most of the stuff can be read online).
OttOmOlOtOv 5 years ago
thank you - I neglected to read the description.
scumbauggio 5 years ago