Added: 3 years ago
From: KingHeathen
Views: 5,989
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (321)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You seem to be bitter... with Christians duh right? :)

    the religious have twisted the things of God very badly, the truth of God is in spirit...( I am NOT a churchian. ) bro im so sorry for the hurt the religious have brought to u by following their misinterpritations... Christ is real, he revealed himself to me, NOT by me studying or going to religion. keep hope bro... thats all man.

  • @nicwright09 You seem like a nice enough person and I'm sure you mean well. But you are dead wrong about what you think my motivations are. Watch "why do I do this?" if you would like the answer to that question. Bitterness has nothing to do with it.

  • Their just saying that, so if the off chance someone DOES die, you will think how amasing they are. People do a lot of that, they say something is going to happen, knowing full well their full of crap. But if they are right, they will take all the glory for it.

    Next time, you should do that on a match, I do it sometimes, it's really funny.

  • LOL this is going on my favorites list, this only proves that enen a fart is more powerful than the all knowing sky daddy!

  • lmfao!!!!

  • dont light a match lol

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Nice!!!! That made me laugh out loud in my office. You never fail to amuse me with your wit and humor. Glad to know the world is not coming to an end just yet.

  • I was thinking in my head..make it a gas joke, make it a gas joke...

  • Well that was very childish.

    But it made me laugh, so thumbs up!

  • The Bible Dilemma: Historical contradictions, misquoted statements, failed prophecies and oddities in the Bible

    at thebibledilemma com

  • It is out of my sick twisted morbid curiousity that I even find myself watching your videos Kingheathen. I admit it is 'my bad". However when I see your face and hear your voice I ALWAYS have to stifle the urge to vomit. You are a wretched person. You are so vile that I have to take a shower every time I watch your videos in a vain attempt to feel human again. I am NOT saying I am better than you. I am the one responsible for tuning in to your trash. I am just telling you how I feel.

  • @belugafishgod I could help if you like. Being that you have such HORRIBLE self-control and feel the need to be so NON-CHRIST-LIKE when you respond to me...I could simply advise you to block me, I'll do the same for you, and then you won't have to worry about any future exchanges like this one.

    That, of course, is ENTIRELY up to you.  I don't block people unless they are abusive, or spamming. But if it will help you control yourself, I will lend a hand.

    (PS-get over yourself.)

  • @KingHeathen Do me a big favor and BLOCK ME.......PLEASE!

  • @KingHeathen Do me a big favor and BLOCK ME.......PLEASE! P.s. Non-Christlike? That's a joke coming from you!

  • @belugafishgod OK, but please understand that this isn't some act of me censoring you or not wanting to hear your comments on the subjects. This is me doing for you what you can't seem to do for yourself. You're welcome. Remember, you need to block me too, so that my comments don't show up for you and won't tempt you to watch another of my videos. My part ONLY stops you from being tempted to say hateful things as you so often do. Take care and I hope you get over yourself.

  • @belugafishgod You sir are an ASSHAMMER this man is a GOD DAMN HERO! He Speaks the Truth unlike the fucking Bible! You go ahead and Read your story Book of lies and ill watch this dude lay waste to your Bull Shit Religion. You Christians enjoy your Hate Mongering,Homophobic,Child Molesting ways. And ill enjoy this EPIC fart at your expence! You have been owned.

  • Damn dude, if that was a real gas, that one would probably make you bleed.

  • hahahahaha

  • Wow, the videos used to be intelligent. What happend?

  • @asmodeous9 I dont know who Xian is.

    Definition of Listen

    1. to concentrate on hearing something

    2. to take heed; pay attention

    so what do you want to know?

  • @MCBloodBath1 Don't be a douche....I don't know any adults that wouldn't understand that "Xian" means "Christian" the same way "Xmas" means "Christmas"...it's a pretty popular abbreviation of the term. So much so, my spell checker even recognizes it as a word!

  • @KingHeathen Well sorry for not knowing... why didn't you just sat Christian... then yes I am a "Xian" I guess I'm not as smart as a spell checker...

  • @MCBloodBath1 I didn't say it to begin with...I was just filling you in. But to answer the question, he used "Xian" because it was shorter and easier to write and he figured you'd know what he meant the same way he figured you understood what "didn't" meant.

    But hey, look at the bright side...YOU LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY! ; )

  • @KingHeathen what a crock of shit.

  • @asmodeous9 I'm pretty sure you don't want to get into theology, and if i even did explain it, you wouldn't listen anyway... so why mach me with your words?...

  • You spend countless hours talking about God for a man who "doesn't believe" It kinda blows my mind... And no one deserves life... thats why God can take it away any time he wants...

  • @MCBloodBath1 If you'd like to know why, you should watch "Why do I do this?"

  • I know that fart was coming, but it STILL made me laugh hysterically.

    And the little punctuated finish was the topper!

  • some preacher said they had talked to god and he said they would find WMD in iraq in FEB..granted this was....bout 6 years ago..also the world and judgement day is suppose to happen next may

  • lol eat less beans. XD Funny though, better to hear and not to smell it. XD

  • he spoke into you're fart and bowel moved you. ^_^

  • Glad to see you've let Jesus into your fart, I mean heart.

  • my laugh of the day........thanks!!!!!!!!

  • Hallelujah! Jesus Christ has spoken to you personally! Not just to your heart, but His clarion bullhorn announced His will right into your Blessed Asshole! Praise His Mighty Flatulence!!! Tell us, oh mighty KingHeathen, what grand wisdom can you pull out of your ass next?!!!

  • LOL

  • "Daniel's timeline".. This is hilarious!

    watch?v=S1bkB1nShSU

  • Shart!

  • Ha-Ha!!!!! Too Funny...not expected !

  • Okay, so these are prophesies that didn't come true. What does it have to do with the Biblical ones? Just because there are theories about the past that are waay out there (Aliens made it) does that mean that every theory about the past is wrong? Same thing for the future.

  • "What does it have to do with the Biblical ones?"

    Nothing...who said it was supposed to?

    Here, I'll help you have the correct response you should have had, but didn't because you were too prepared to come in defensively...

    "Wow, King Heathen. Those people sure did miss the mark. They were obviously NOT true prophets. Perhaps people should be more skeptical before believing such claims."

    See, Agreeing with me didn't hurt, did it?

  • That was the most childish thing I've ever seen a grown man do, especially when trying to disprove God. Anyway, nobody really cares what some kooks say about when the world is going to end. People have been saying stupid stuff like that for years, Bible has always said the same thing. "Beware that no one leads you astray" - Matthew 24:4 "I am the Alpha and the Omega" - Revelation 1:8

  • The scariest part in all of this is that one day, all these mockers will remember the warnings that were passed down to them and they laughed it all off. Time is the enemy of these people. When time runs out....... so does their existence.

  • That's a very interesting point actually, because there are multiple religions, Islam being one, who have MORE followers than your reglion who KNOW (in their religious terms-just like your own) that you will be the one that has to answer when time runs out. Interesting how that works huh? Oh and by the way, when time runs out (a meteorite hits the earth) we all die. Thanks for playing he price is right.

  • persius

    "The scariest part in all of this is that one day, all these mockers will remember the warnings that were passed down to them and they laughed it all off."

    It would simply prove that I've been right all along, that is that JC is a cruel, sadistic deity, who would tell us how loving and forgiving he is, then in the same breath he tells us that he will send us to hell for not submitting!!

    If that's your idea of "a savior," no thanks!

    If I have to go to hell it won't be on my knees!

  • I'm not surprised by your comment at all. In your eyes, Christ is "sadistic". You resent him because he says there is the right way to live and a wrong way. You want to live life the way you want to and you hate the thought that there are laws to everything. In your opinion God's word is restrictive. In reality when you examine what God has to say you quickly learn that his words are protective. The word of God assures us all that "ALL knees will bow". this includes yours. Guaranteed.

  • pers

    What an arrogant, ignorant thing to say!

    "All knees will bow, some will go to heaven, most will go to hell!!"

    Those are the words of an evil tyrant, not a loving, compassionate being!

    Btw, I was in the military. I've lived with rules and regs all my life. To me the only rule that counts is the Golden Rule. I don't need a god for that.

    If the Xian god is so loving & all-forgiving, why would he resort to using threats of hell-fire to gain converts?

    R U a Xian convert out of fear?

  • I agree that the golden rule is a universal truth regardless of religion. But I would like to know why you believe it. I mean, without God there is no universal moral truth so why obey it? Also, how does people going to hell go against the idea of compassion? I know that sounded wierd but let me put it this way. God made hell as a place for those who chose to be apart from him. Would it have been more compassionate to force them to be with him? That would be spiritual rape if anything.Its choice

  • Kod...

    It would have been better for god to leave them alone to evolve & learn on their own! (as we do mow) Regardless, Y use such threats? God can't impose goodness onto mankind.

    The bottom line is that hell can't be justified for anything. Since god uses hell, I see him as sadistically cruel. Such punishment has no purpose after the fact!

    I should've used the term all-forgiving, although compassionate still works.

    I don't need god's rules in order want live in peace with my fellow man. (GR)

  • Perhaps I can help clear up the confusion...OK, so God sends me to Hell because I don't want to be with God...what does that have to do with eternal TORTURE!!!!!!!!!! If you don't want to live in Atlanta, we don't tell you that you have to go live in the bottom of a volcano instead...you can pick Chicago, New York, Boise, San Deigo. Why is the choice "me" or "torture?" Could YOU love someone that gave you that option?

  • On the contrary it is because God gives the choice that we can truly love Him. True love is a matter of choice. God could have made us mindless robots incapable of rejecting Him; but then would we be able to truly love? Real love is appearant when there is another option (in this case rejecting Him) yet we choose one over the other. Hell was not meant to be God's "revenge pit." It is a place for those who wish to be removed from God and all that He is. For those who reject Him. That's free will.

  • You missed the point. Why does Hell have to be "torture?" Why not just be a place?

    Imagine, you meet someone. They ask if you love them. You say "YES!" They say "GOOD because otherwise, I'd have to kill you." Someone else comes along and says "No"...they are viciously murdered. How many people would you have to watch this person murder before you decided you wanted no part of them? Is the person described "loving"? or "monstrous?"

  • I'm afraid you missed my point. Let me put it this way; can you walk into a dark room full of light? Of course not. Hell isn't a place of torture in the sense that it is the presence of pain; it is torture in the absense of God, who is everything that is good. Imagine it, an eternity of utter isolation, devoid of any hope or good that is God. that's the true torture. You can't have a lack of God and true happiness at the same time anymore than you can have darkness and light in the same space.

  • I lack any gods and I'm perfectly happy....so I don't see the correlation. It's like saying, "You can't have happiness without cheeseburgers" to a vegetarian.

    But I take it you aren't one of the "Hell fire and brimstone" people....if so, then you are saying that Hell ISN'T a place of torture to someone like us. We won't care if God is there or not.

  • @Kodiaksaint

    " I agree that the golden rule is a universal truth regardless of religion. But I would like to know why you believe it. I mean, without God there is no universal moral truth so why obey it? "

    You just said it was a univeral truth. Why would it need a god to be true?

  • Arrogant in your opinion perhaps. Let's understand something here. I didn't say that, God did. If you don't like it, tough. Take it up with him, not me.

    Fire burns regardless of your belief. Water drowns regardless of your belief. You WILL bow to God one day regardless of your belief so get ready. Just because you don't believe in something does not make it a myth. God isn't asking for your opinion. He's giving you his.

  • Isn't it funny that "God's opinion" always seems to reflect the personal politics, beliefs, and prejudices of the person speaking for it.

    "God" said nothing. A tribe of desert nomads had a set of beliefs they wrote down 2000 years ago (in a time when humanity hd none of the knowledge it does now). Those written words have been translated, mangled, and re-interpreted over the centuries to the point where they are completely unreliable.

    As for you...you are the arrogant one.

  • Can you provide proof of where the Bible is mangled? How it is unreliable?

  • The thing has been translated through a dozen different languages before it got around to English, for one thing. For another, entire books that are in the modern version of the Bible are not present in some of the oldest copies of them. Then there's the fact that any of its "prophecies" can be applied to any decade in human history.

    Read "Misquoting Jesus" and "The Bible Unearthed" for more in depth detail.

  • Yes, the Bible has been translated into numerous languages. How else can people read it? In fact, if you take any language and version and compare them to the original texts, you won't find any changes at all. With the exception of a few words, the exact meanings have not been altered in any way. This is historical and scientific fact. Your argument therefore is invalid. Try researching your "facts" before presenting them next time.

  • Now you are either outright lying or you are painfully ignorant. Entire books are missing from the morre ancient copies, not to mention numerous stories that are such Christian favorites. Like the tale about the woman who was about to be stoned for adultry. The story simply does not exist in these older versions. They were added centuries later.

    Unlike you I actually have done extensive research, have actually read books that didn't validate my own opinions. You plainly have not.

  • You also seem to forget that the Bible was first translated from Aramaic to Greek, and from Greek back to Aramaic.

    Tell you what: Translate something from English into Japoanese. Then have someone else translate it from Japanese back to English.

    Ther Bible had no magical protection on it. Stuff was added, edited, and deleted depending on the political aims of the copiers and translators over many, many centuries. .

  • If reading books that validate your opinion come from other sceptics, then you have nothing to brag about. I can read a physics book and claim I read it from start to finish, but that doesn't' mean I understood its content. Can you support anything you stated or is this just something that sounds good based on what others have told you?

  • I just provided you with two sources. 500 characters is nowhere nearly ebough to go into the detail I'd need to.

    BTW: The books I listed aren't from "mere" skeptics. They are from professionals in their fields: Archaeology in the first case and historical theology in the second.

  • Your logic is invalid. First, you claim that if we translate something from Japanese to English and back to Japanese we'll have errors. Perhaps. However, nobody needs to translate from Hebrew to English to Hebrew again so we don't have that problem. There are no errors in the translations at any time in history. Second, your "experts" mean very little. There are "experts" who claim the holocaust never happened. There are "experts" who claim little green men come down to earth and steal..

  • animals for experiments etc. Your so called "experts" have provided nothing to prove anything. What exactly is your point here?

  • And now the straw man comes out.

    First: The books of the Bible were written in ancient Aramaic and later translated into Greek...then translated back again. The English Bible is based on the re-translation of a translation. If you claim there are no errors at any timne in history, then you plainly have done no homework on history.

    Second: Unlike the UFO nuts and the Holocaust deniers, the folk I cited have actual, peer-reviewed evidence. If you're going to take that tack...(cont)

  • (cont)...and simply dismiss anyone who disagrees with your preconceptions (regardless of how strong their evidence is), then there simply isn't any point in continuing this conversation.

    If you can't see a difference between the crackpots and the professionals...or refuse to...then there is simply no hope of any kind of argument getting through to you. You have made up your mind despite being presented with real-world evidence, and refuse to look at it.

  • 5 bucks u shit ur pants rofl

  • Your video is titled "Failed Prophecies". Non of your so called prophecies had anything to do with the Bible. What's the point of this video then?

  • Does every video I do have to be about the Bible? Why not simply agree with me that these failed prophecies show that the people claiming them were charlatans?

  • that's what I think, people can cay anything they want like what this guy is saying right now, but that doesn't have anything with God or Bible, after watch this video he looks more stupid than before.

  • HAhahhahahahahaahahahahahahahh­ahaha!!!!!!! I'd agree with that (RockerGirl926)

  • There will be false prophets and false prophecy. (Mathew 24) Pray that nobody decieves you.

  • We do not need to pray that noone deceives us. We can THINK and are not that gullible. Apparently, you have been deceived.....

  • i saw that coming a mile away haha

  • are you going to wait for the admission or are you going to send a letter when the tabulation is finished?

  • Actually...I went to write to him and see if he was going to comment on his BS...

    and the account is closed.

    Go figure.

  • I should have known... no wait I did. now you want to play the numbers 27 36 15 28 08 in some lottery somewhere in the world in the next 4 years.

  • I saw that coming! lol

  • Don't get me wrong about that now zoology does benefit the animals in alot of ways. But the theory of us actually being animals doesn't benefit us or them. The best thing for the animals in my opinion is animal protection agencies not evolutionists.

  • You can split hairs all day but in the end one answer only leads to another question in the theory of evolution. It's brought nothing good to humanity and is useless to science.

  • "in the end one answer only leads to another question"

    That's how almost everything works. That's the great thing about science. We get to find those questions, test them, discover the answers....

    vs just saying "God did it!"

    But again, I ask you to put up or shut up...would you care to test your knowledge of the theory? Even if you don't believe it, let's see if you even know what it is!

  • What exactly are we accomplishing with this man came from an animal hoax? Nothing, so rather you believe it or not it doesn't make a difference. It doesn't help us gain any knowledge in medicine or help learn anything helpful about the body and it certainly doesn't help uncover history. We are gaining absolutely nothing from this. All it's brought is delusional thinking and animalistic outlooks on life. It doesn't even help the animals either.

  • what evidence do you have that suggests evolution doesnt help anything? The evidence for the contrary is pretty substantial. Have you seen the papers written on new AIDS treatments? Based entirely on evolutionary processes, and have yielded promising results.

  • all vaccines are based on evolutionary study. Genetics is all based on evolutionary theory. Just because you are too ignorant of what science is doing with the knowledge, that doesn't make it not exist.

    Your idea that we were "poofed" here by a magical sky daddy does immense damage though.

    Understanding evolution has allowed us to breed animals to strengthen species...you have no idea what you are talking about. Just stop.

  • saying it over and over doesnt make it true, especially when their is substantial REAL evidence proving your ridiculous claims false.

  • I bet you do Heathen. You probably observed all of this happen aswell right?

  • If your best defence is attacking my spelling then don't even bother replying. Just like evolution you have nothing to offer to science and are therefore useless. You need to explain the big bang before you get to the life spontaneously forming part so please start from there.

  • not true. You don't need to explain everything to explain something. Prove beyond a reasonable doubt gravity exists. Oh you cant? Must be false. Good logic, moron.

  • drop a rock

  • that proves the rock will fall to the ground. Gravity is supposed to be universal, yet from our knowledge of general gravity, it breaks down in certain cases. General/Special relativity etc. You can never absolutely prove anything, unless its a math equation.

  • math equations only work because magical pixies keep allowing them to.

    When the last pixie dies...all math will cease to exist.

    SEE! Even math can't be "proven".

  • Not true. Gravity is universal - according to some theories it is even the ONLY universal force, unlike for example dark energy. But Newtonian gravity, of course, is not universal :)

  • gravity only exists where mass is present ...

  • Can you defend your arguments or only insult mine? Prove without a shadow of a doubt thaty one species can evolve into another over millions of years, I'm sure you'll say something retarded like "Well... We can't observe it but it still happens." Or the even more retarded "Thats not how evolution works." Tell me exactly what proof you have that we evolved from single celled life form to humans over millions of years. Go ahead and exlain how life spontaneously came into esistence aswell.

  • Keep trying to feed the public your evolution theory all you want but your not convincing us. The majority of the world population isn't buying into it and the only people that believe in it are you scientists who insist that the only reason we don't believe it is because we interpret the evidence differently than you.

    Peace

  • Then you've already fooled yourself. You're already dead.

  • What is cruel to you may not be cruel to God. You have the wisdom and knowledge you are allowed to have not what you think you have. God created it and he can destroy it. If you think that's cruel well, that's just tough. I personally think it's cruel to teach our kids that they are nothing more than descendants of apes. Why not just teach them that there genealogy goes back to bacteria.

  • that is what we teach them. when watches are being made in which case they are better. when they constatly tick without interuption or when you have to constantly intervene when something goes wrong. and that is why evolution is even grander then a creationists point of view. (and I am not talking about universe just about the origin of species)

  • a classic example of rubbish being broadcasted on the net.

  • Dude... that stein is awesome... Don't know about alcohol n' philosophy though.

  • Good thing I wasn't drinking anything while watching this video. My laptop would be ruined.

  • kingh,

    You're driven by unbelief..it will be your chain.

    When Pharaoh heard the Word of God through Moses, there was one correct response..

    ..do it.

    Likewise, with the audience of Noah.

    Nineveh wised up..

    "So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them." (Jon 3:5)

    Learn from them.

    :-)

  • you know what...never mind...I can see you aren't interested in stopping what I politely asked you to stop doing and you bore me with this crap. So, Bye bye.

  • who ever told you about 1012 was a fool its not the end just a new begining... lots of disasters people dieign and its not gona happen in one day.. its been happening for a while and will continue after 2012.. some scientest are backing it up now.. its really awsome and i hope it happens as sick as that sounds... what happens can best be summed up by the Tool sonf enema.. other than thate read up on it ur self. sorry if someone already told u this.. not going through 210 comments so...

  • WACK!!!! a 5 minute video on false profecies, wow you go something to say there. accept JESUS, HE loves you.

  • kingh,

    Don't waste your life building sand castles of Bible criticism to make the Bible go away and justify sin.

    It never works.

    Come to Christ.

    "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (Joh 14:6)

    :-)

  • Then refute the claims made. If they are so easily defeated...this "sand castle" is ready for you to knock down. Go for it. When you fail, you can come to the Flying Spaghetti Monster who loves you more than Jesus. He gave you a stripper factory and beer volcano.

    "May his noodley appendages be upon you"

    Ramen!

  • Lemme get a RAmen from the congregation!!!!

  • I can tear you're sand castle down right now. Explain man's origins without using Darwinism. It's the same as you telling us not to use our Bible. Darwinisms Origin of Man by Natural Selection couldn't happen anyway without being guided. Bebuiled you're sand castle of endless knowledge almighty intelligent heathen. Sarcasm because you lack both intelligence and wisdom. Hence, you're foolish pride prevents you from feeling any presence of God.

  • Sand castle? More like quartz fortress. If it happened in a guided manner, who did it? from what it seems, YOUR foolish pride prevents you from having any thought process that doesnt involve God.

  • wow ... is English like your 9th language? Take a biology class, moron ... its really not that difficult to understand unless youre a retarded close minded creationist that clings to their ancient book, cherry picking morals and pretty verses at their own will.

  • Grammer has no meaning here if you wan't to correct spelling start with your own and if you're still not happy go to a spelling bee.

  • oh my spelling is fine. And do you mean grammar? I don't know whats worse, your piss more spelling and grammar, or your absolute ignorance of very basic scientific facts. You fail.

  • noone is doing this to justify sin it is to compound logic which you obviously have none

  • You have no logic! You can't accept what's long been written down as mans origins so you turn to science which can't give you an answer yet you blindly believe you have mutated from another life form. NATURAL SELECTION CANNOT HAPPEN ON IT'S OWN!!!!!!!!

  • Natural selection DID happen on its own and im sorry i dont listen to a book written by iron age goat hearders. You make me sick pushing your idealogical beliefs on others.

  • Prove it! simple enough, just prove it. Show your empirical evidence that we mutated and nature led everything up to what is today on it's own. You can't prove what you believe any more than I can prove what I believe. It takes as much if not more faith to believe one of your ancestors was a single cell floating on dust or rising from mud. You don't listen because you don't want to believe in the Living God because you think it exempts you from judgment. Sorry but you will not be cut loose.

  • go look at the fossil record that is enough proof for anyone. Y ou just plug your ears and go lalalalalalala wheneever anyone trys to explain to you evolution.

  • AND BTW evolution attempts to explain the diverstiy of species NOT the creation of them please get your ideas straightened out before you criticize. The creation of life is a completely different field of study. And also my rjection of the idea of a god is not because i am afraid of judgement its because there is no judgement other than that of your peers and well im am an outstanding moral citizen and its not just because i am afraid of your god.

  • "NATURAL SELECTION CANNOT HAPPEN ON IT'S OWN!!!!!!!!"

    Really? So if I go out and hunt down and kill all brown dogs, you think that some how their genes will continue to spread? I suppose you think that my intervention proves your statement that it can't happen "on its own"...

    Well, then every lion that hunts a gazelle assists NS as well. So does EVERY SINGLE LIVING THING.

    So I suppose you are right. Natural selection requires the intervention of other life. But no GOD is needed.

  • That would be happening on it's own would it? No It would need your assistance and therefore deeming it impossible to happen on it's own. Thank you for making what I was stating that much clearer. It can't happen own it's own becuase nature doesn't have mind powers. Please don't eventell me that the only reason I don't believe is because I just don't understand evolution and how it works. The truth is you don't understand it any better than me do to the fact that there is no evidence to observe.

  • WOW...do you really not see how ignorant you are to the process of natural selection? YES...NS needs the interaction of other organisms. The pressure of a predator speeds up the process. HOWEVER, take the extinction of the dinosaurs and the rise of the mammals which occurred due to a massive strike by a meteorite. Did your god send that?

    I assure you...I understand it better than you. Would you care to put your claim to a test?

  • kingh,

    Here's a "circle" for you..

    "All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and [he] to whomsoever the Son will reveal [him]." (Mt 11:27)

    God has chosen HIS way through which HE can be KNOWN.

    Sorry, it's not by syllogism puzzles.

    We all know that's a dead end.

    God requires FAITH in His FACTS, FIRST.

    He knows our REAL and DEEPEST problem..

    ..which is spiritual.

    :-)

  • ok, trac...I'm going to say this just one time...

    quit with the bullshit Bible quotes. Damn near everyone is irrelevant to what is being said and your style of posting makes it really annoying as it stretches out the comment section making it harder to read the other posts from people making direct points to what is being said.

    Meanwhile, you didn't respond to a single point I made...so I'm no longer interested in responding to you.

  • kingh,

    You've got it!

    Welcome to Biblical FINAL AUTHORITY.

    THIS is the issue.

    Will satanic fury and rebellious men prove victorious, or God?

    "Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times [the things] that are not [yet] done, saying, MY COUNSEL SHALL STAND, and I WILL DO all my pleasure:" (Isa 46:10)

    "..hath God said.."? (Gen. 3:1)

    :-0

  • kingh,

    The final authority on all New Testament fulfillments, referencing the Old Testament, IS the New Testament.

    Rabbinical criticisms are N/A.

    The verse is infallible as is.

    All criticisms of it, are created by antichrists.

    Thus, disregard.

    :-)

  • kingh,

    ALWAYS dump Bible critical information.

    It's all worthless created by sin defenders.

    "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son." (1Jo 2:22)

    Receive Christ.

    Eternal life will begin for you.

    :-)

  • And here we see how insane your logic can get. So ANYTHING, no matter how factually based or logically sound, that is critical of your special book should be ignored just because it disagrees with you....

    classic definition of "willful ignorance"...no thank you.

    "The NT is the authority on the NT"...classic definition of CIRCULAR LOGIC! No thank you.

  • lol...

    really bad acting at the end but quite hilarious!

  • All Bible prophecies have been, and will be, fulfilled.

    The final authority on "fulfill" in the New Testament, IS the New Testament...

    ..NEVER Rabbinical challenge. Rabbinical disagreement with the NT is N/A.

    "Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us." (Mt 1:23)

    :-)

  • Thank you for quoting the line that proves the writer of Matthew didn't have a freaking clue what he was talking about. This verse is a MISQUOTATION...one of the many errors in the Bible...from a story about a "YOUNG GIRL" (not a virgin) that was to have a child. On top of that, it was about A DIFFERENT YOUNG GIRL! NOT MARY! The child WAS born. It was NEVER part of the prophesy for a messiah.

  • that jeffery chad guy sounds like a moron. i can make a prophesy. in the year 2020 there will be no more religion

  • if only prophecies came true...*sigh*

  • Yes That was Heart Burn

  • I think whoever wrote revelations was propable against the formation of the catholic church. granted it was written almost 3 hundred years before but perhaps he was aware of the plan and disagreed with it.

    or I am reading too much into this and its all coincidence. quite possible.

    Or the bible is the world of God and as an athiest I don't believe that and I am thinking that the author of Rev was part of the gnostic tradition and was againt the paganizing of the christain religion. your thought

  • Seth, using your style of "fulfillment", I can make anything mean anything. Watch the movie The Number 23 and you'll get a glimpse of what I mean.

    I'm probably going to do a video on this type of prophesy fulfillment soon. I haven't chosen my "prophesy" to fulfill yet. I'm thinking about "I Am Legend" or possibly 2010: Space Odyssey. (or whatever the exact title was.)

  • well i don't actually think that my interprtation of Rev 13 is actuallyt the fulfillment of Gods word but rather the authors cyptic rebellion of the political plan to paganized christainity. The early chuch was gnostic and there is a possiblity that so was the author.

    I don't see the catholic church as a leader of a religion as so much as a political agenda.

    Keep in mind that the church use to kill people for reading the bible. Makes me think there has to be something in there they didn't like

  • Oh I don't think that the fullfillment was part of Gods plan at all. Being that he doesn't exist and thus cannot plan but rather the author rebelling against the formation of a political church and thought that was evil and was cryptically warning the early gnostic christains against it. Just a Hypothesis for one can't know what motivated the author of Rev for sure.

  • The whore continued..

    she has names on her forhead.

    Mystery Babylon. the popes hat looks like a fish head, the bablyon god dogan ditto.

    Sunday was the bablyonion day of worship.

    The mother of prostitutes: This bitch has children, well there are a lot of churches that spawn from the catholic church all using her image and sabbeth.

    Mother of abominations: the catholic church has idol worship/talks to the dead/ incorporated the winter solstice and other pagen rituals.

  • Now lets look at the whore of babaylon which rides a 7 headed beast that is identified as both 7 hills and 7 kings.

    The vatican is built on 7 hills

    the 7 kings if you start with john the baptist who passes the torch to jesus who appionts peter and keep going you will get 7 kings before the catholic church is formed. And jesus is the head that is mortally wounding and heals and the world does marval and worship him.

  • The beast also created an image of the first beast and cuased anyone who did not worship this image to be killed. Well I think that image is the cross. Another point the number of the beast and this is really wired. In Latin the pops title is Vicarivs felii del V=5 F=0 D=500 i=1 i=1 e=0 c=100 l=50 i=1 a=0 i=1 r=0 i=1 i=1 v=5 s=0 With the roman numrial system one can calculate 666. as an athiest I am at a lost for words but it gets stranger still.
  • Rev 13

    The beast of the sea: had 7 heads that became one mind. The catholic church started as 7 churches which became one church.

    The red dragon, which most christains beleive to be the roman empire, who gave his authority to the catholic church.

    And then there was the beast of the land which had two heads which had professions of the lamb and spoke as a dragon.

    This is the bible which has both an old and new testement and became the law of the land.

  • There are a couple of bible prophecies that did come true.

    1 Daniel 7:25 talks about the antichrist changing the times and laws.

    This was fulfilled by jesus for he changed the commandmnets down to two and there was no B.C and the time line before christianity.; Thus changing the times and laws.

    P.S Rome also changed the calander from being lunar to solar.

  • LOL. I did not see that coming. Nice, man...

  • Haha - Drunk...!

  • the good book makes it very clear that "feelings" are not to be trusted.

    ...and try tums.

  • funny, but every time we ask Christians for proof of their god they always talk about....THEIR FEELINGS?!?!?!

    hmmm.

  • that isn't proof and its not substantial in any way. if you base anything on feelings explicitly you're not using your brain.

    emotions are mud in the gears of the mind.

    i suspect that this flawed logic is a large part of why you feel the way you do about christians. look at what catholicism did with real power and look what selfish people did in the name of God on witch hunts here.

    these acts where done out of fear, pride, greed, and a myriad of other things that the good book is against.

  • "i suspect that this flawed logic is a large part of why you feel the way you do about christians." ignoring that you've most likely characterized me unfairly here...it's but a small piece of the whole puzzle. The "flawed logic" oozes from almost every conversation about religion with theists. I mean, where do you start? Appeal to emotion, Pascal's wager, goddidit, all things need a creator except the creator, the banana, straw man versions of evolution...it's one bad argument after the next.

  • its really a matter of perspective. the main problem people have is when they try to argue theology with someone who doesn't even believe in a God. if you want to get anywhere you first have to establish the possibility of this being.

    a LOT of the time its them taking bait, bait you know you want them to take because there are a TON of things you can rip on that have zero relevance to the question "how did all of this get started?".

  • the problem i find with a lot of people is that they fail to admit that they could be wrong. i could be wrong, there is a possibility that i'm totally deluded and i just think it all adds up but so far all signs point to a sum that is equal to all its parts.

    you think its settling/ignorant/arrogant to say that there has to be a God.

    I think its settling/ignorant/arrogant to say that the universe began from nothing with no cause by no outside sentient force.

    different sides of the same coin.

  • ugh...science does NOT claim the universe began from nothing. That's the theistic view. Watch "Something from Nothing" for more.

    You seem to be fairly reasonable thus far, but you should really drop that phrasing from your dialog as it grossly misrepresents scientific teachings about Big Bang.

  • It isn't a theistic view, its a philosophical one.

    i've come to the conclusion that if mathematics is the father of science them philosophy is its mother.

    to put it more blatantly: if mathematics is the father to "our observation of our reality" then philosophy is its mother.

    philosophy is the intuitive questioning process. science (or the observation of the world around us using empirical means) is the product of questioning things.

    thus, philosophy can go where science can't.

  • philosophy has nothing to do with a "god" creating the universe out of empty space. That's a THEISTIC claim. It's STRICTLY a theistic claim if it makes the statement of "god".

    Science teaches us that mass-energy is neither created nor destroyed. So this claim of "something from nothing" IS NOT scientific. However, to claim their WAS nothing and then God made it all...FROM NOTHING...it's a theistic claim. Philosophy hasn't entered the equation yet.

  • if a philosophical pondering leads to the conclusion that there must be something outside of this dimension that doesn't make it a theistic question.

    philosophy simplified is "wondering". science is the process by which we try to find answers with our tangible reality.

    science can't measure or even speculate beyond what you guys see the starting point to the universe as being.

    philosophy is using reason to conclude things that empirical means cannot. thats why i think its a much better tool.

  • you aren't understanding what I am saying. Forget whether or not you agree me on the existance of a god...

    to CLAIM a god is a theistic statement REGARDLESS of the "philosophy" that got you there. Once you claim a god to create the matter that made the universe you have to ask the question, "Where did the matter come from?" IF you say "god made it," then OUT OF WHAT? "out of NOTHING"...then the theistic statement is that matter came from nothing. Science says it always existed.

  • On the completely separate issue of the usefulness of philosophy...

    While it certainly has it's uses, philosophy can't be determined as "better" than science because no matter how well thought out your philosophy is...it's still just your opinion. THERE IS NO solid evidence for an opinion. Science on the other hand has the ability to prove things (as best we can). Neither is better. Each has completely different useages. A hammer is not better than a screwdriver, only in certain cases.

  • the beauty of philosophy is that you might be right, you might not, but the ambiguity of truth should never overshadow the necessary importance of it.

    what is true is not defined by what you can prove, it is defined by what IS.

  • if you claim a God then yeah that is a theistic statement but it isn't a theistic question to ask "well where did the matter come from?".

    it had to come from somewhere or it had to always be here. since we know the universe grows that means the universe began (As im sure you'll agree) and if it began there was a time when it wasn't in existence.

    here is my point:

    i believe that however all of this got rolling it had to happen from outside of this dimension.

  • correct, THAT is not a theistic statement...but back up and notice what I said...the idea of something coming from nothing is a theistic statement...not from science. I wasn't addressing "where did the matter come from". just the notion that it came from nothing, which science does NOT claim, but theism DOES.

    Now, to address "beginning"...Big Bang was the beginning of the universe AS WE KNOW IT...there was still "before" it. We just don't have the means to study it...yet.

  • Neither I nor Big Bang theory claims there was "nothing" prior to the expansion. So, no, we don't agree that the universe "began"...only the universe AS WE KNOW IT.

  • continuing my thoughts on infinite or created things:

    if you go back forever (not literally of course) either the universe is a perpetual motion machine set into action by itself OR an outside force came upon it and set it into motion OR an outside force engineered it and set it into motion.

    i believe that it has to be one of these three options. do you?