@buaydianway Okay, so we know this chip is great for Windows Mobile, but I have ALL SORTS OF LAG when on an android device with a 800mhz clock speed. do you know why?
it plays smooth on my acer F900 too. But if i play the same video with TCPMP or CorePlayer i get lag. The problem is: WMPlayer, wich works fine and smooth, does not support Xvid codec, so any xvid videos will be played lagged.
its the video render use on wmp! samsung chip is with MP4 decoder already so if the OEM added the driver for WMP to use to render, the video it will be playing using hardware decoding.
while TCPMP and CORE PLAYER did not add support for samsung chip for video driver so it will be lagging without hardware support.
F900 is clearly the winner for the chip Vs Qualcomm that HTC ALWAYS USE to earn more $ and build more lousy pda phones for people who dont understand.
5 stars, It's clear the HTC isnt as good performance wise than the Acer (got the HD, and videos look better on mates BB Bold) HTC drivers are basically crap as why the HD doesnt perform as its hardware suggests. Saying that, Acer's just a newer low cost copy of the HD (you can tell Acer tried to copy the HD's design and in the process, just made it look cheap), doesnt look as sexy, HD is smaller, and TF3D UI just looks so much better. also got xda support. Will never swap my HD for that Acer.
I played the video on my HTC touch HD, and it plays smoothly. No frame loss (except when I switch to full screen for a second or two). However, it takes 2-3 seconds to switch to FS and back. Switching is much smoother on the Acer. My HD runs, wm 6.5 with the latest drivers. If I play the video in Core player, it works better, but not ideal.
wow this video was kinda pointless...everyone knows htc touch hd is lacking 3d/2d hardware acceleration... its old news... htc didnt buy the drivers from qualcomm so its like have a ferrari with no keys to turn it on...
Amazing, i was a bit disappointed when i heard the i8000 Omnia2 will have the S3C6410 instead of the Snapdragon, but when i see this i´m positiively surprised. thx for the vid.
Can you upload a video and compare 3D rendering, like with Asphalt4?
huh? do you know even what you're talking about? Snapdragon is better than this samsung SoC at everything. MSM7200 and snapdragon are two completely different things.
to buaydianway:
This video isn't h.264 it is standard mpeg4 stream.
Something had to be wrong with this Touch HD cause I've seen videos proving that Touch HD is capable of playbacking stream at similar quality through WMP.
uuh did u read or even understand what i wrote? i guess not. Get some english lessons and reconsider what u wrote.
But i agree, this video is not Mpeg4-AVC, i guess its mpeg2, i checked the vid with Mediaplayer Classic and it is rendered by the standard libavcodec instead of ffmpeg-mt codec which i associated to H.264.
So this fact actually places Touch HD even in deeper shit.Even XScale has better Video performance than that MSM 72XX shit, check out other Videos.
You are telling everyone you are an idiot over the internet. Codec support is on windows mobile system not on chip. DIVX are not supported on ACER F900 smartass, You must have seen other SAMSUNG phone model that are supporting DIVX/XVID codec like the i900 omnia which uses INTEL chip. even if the system is with the codec,it must have a faster processor to playback a high res video
50yrs ago divx aint out you moron
if you are reading this comment, i totally had the time of your useless life.
I agree bro, this happens on my Touch Pro but its the freaken Chip they use. Same for slow scrolling and so on. To get better playback, I use Core Player and its smooth as fuck but its sad I cant get it with Windows Media Player. I heard that Acer sucks though if your running multiple programs becuase of the limited ram. Is it true?
128MB is sufficient for many program but it depends on what program you are running, take for instant, TF3D, it will take away most of yr ram, that why hTC devices give more ram, but PC theory, if your CPU cannot handle fast processing, you need more buffering space, hence more RAM added to htc device when they using a slow CPU.
if you use coreplayer this video that i provide will not be smooth playing, do try it, even with Qtv driver, Qualcomm cannot handle well on high res video stiill
what is the video size?? Encoded? MP4? Well im saying cuz I run a MP4 (320X400) I believe and its really nice on core player compared to Windows Media Player on my Touch Pro. I heard that its limited Ram sucks if your running their new Today Home Screen cu its like TOUCH FLO 3D and it sucks it ram up. I have touch flo 3d disabled and run Spb Mobile Shell 3 so I can get better performance and it does.
my res is 720x480 for the video. coreplayer is a 3rd party app, usually for the test,we must have a OUT-OF-BOX ready condition, in term of rom customization, Windows Media Player must be ready & able to access any video driver on board.
coreplayer provides a more detail on benchmark, just play the clip u have & open media properties to see your dropped frame & played fps.
I hope the Omnia HD doesnt have these problems like the Touch HD. I need to start seeing a Tegra phone or fuxk Windows Mobile 6.5, we need 7 dont u agree man? I had the custom 6.5 rom on my touch pro and went back to 6.1
who cares? both are taiwanese and you know that the Taiwanese make good stuff
screw Samsung and LG, they suck assss
JUST2AZN4U2 1 year ago
@JUST2AZN4U2 i care
K9rosie 1 year ago
@K9rosie
not snapdragon, snapdragon chip are SND8250, this is 7000 series
you will find snapdragon on HD2 , this is video for HD1
buaydianway 1 year ago
@buaydianway Okay, so we know this chip is great for Windows Mobile, but I have ALL SORTS OF LAG when on an android device with a 800mhz clock speed. do you know why?
K9rosie 9 months ago
nice l4d video, does the htc touch have the snapdragon processor?
K9rosie 1 year ago
the htc touch hd is very slow
213fergo 1 year ago
What the best of touchscreen system - acer or htc -?? please tell meeeee..
zymphoniiez 2 years ago
fuck, i want see HD videos on my htc touch HD... is better omnia 2?
Daniazco 2 years ago
it plays smooth on my acer F900 too. But if i play the same video with TCPMP or CorePlayer i get lag. The problem is: WMPlayer, wich works fine and smooth, does not support Xvid codec, so any xvid videos will be played lagged.
TK8177 2 years ago
thats not the problem.
its the video render use on wmp! samsung chip is with MP4 decoder already so if the OEM added the driver for WMP to use to render, the video it will be playing using hardware decoding.
while TCPMP and CORE PLAYER did not add support for samsung chip for video driver so it will be lagging without hardware support.
F900 is clearly the winner for the chip Vs Qualcomm that HTC ALWAYS USE to earn more $ and build more lousy pda phones for people who dont understand.
Tabbeq 2 years ago
Ohhhh, are you kiddies sad about the ACER F900 kicking ass? Sorry, but there's no need to be so sour.....
By the way, I have just ordered an F900, this phone is the SH&T !!!
bigcris76 2 years ago
The hd2 will murder the new acer. Not even funny lol. Acer is like a poor mans htc. XD
kpopsaranghaex3 2 years ago
or you can buy 2 F900 in the price of 1 HD2, and use one to play football :P
marios4all 2 years ago
Hows the New Acer Neo Touch
equal or better to HD2 ?
ilordvader 2 years ago
5 stars, It's clear the HTC isnt as good performance wise than the Acer (got the HD, and videos look better on mates BB Bold) HTC drivers are basically crap as why the HD doesnt perform as its hardware suggests. Saying that, Acer's just a newer low cost copy of the HD (you can tell Acer tried to copy the HD's design and in the process, just made it look cheap), doesnt look as sexy, HD is smaller, and TF3D UI just looks so much better. also got xda support. Will never swap my HD for that Acer.
McobraR 2 years ago
I played the video on my HTC touch HD, and it plays smoothly. No frame loss (except when I switch to full screen for a second or two). However, it takes 2-3 seconds to switch to FS and back. Switching is much smoother on the Acer. My HD runs, wm 6.5 with the latest drivers. If I play the video in Core player, it works better, but not ideal.
Cheers!
TheMasterR 2 years ago
wow this video was kinda pointless...everyone knows htc touch hd is lacking 3d/2d hardware acceleration... its old news... htc didnt buy the drivers from qualcomm so its like have a ferrari with no keys to turn it on...
kpopsaranghaex3 2 years ago
Amazing, i was a bit disappointed when i heard the i8000 Omnia2 will have the S3C6410 instead of the Snapdragon, but when i see this i´m positiively surprised. thx for the vid.
Can you upload a video and compare 3D rendering, like with Asphalt4?
bgayts 2 years ago
huh? do you know even what you're talking about? Snapdragon is better than this samsung SoC at everything. MSM7200 and snapdragon are two completely different things.
to buaydianway:
This video isn't h.264 it is standard mpeg4 stream.
Something had to be wrong with this Touch HD cause I've seen videos proving that Touch HD is capable of playbacking stream at similar quality through WMP.
thefishmaster89 2 years ago
uuh did u read or even understand what i wrote? i guess not. Get some english lessons and reconsider what u wrote.
But i agree, this video is not Mpeg4-AVC, i guess its mpeg2, i checked the vid with Mediaplayer Classic and it is rendered by the standard libavcodec instead of ffmpeg-mt codec which i associated to H.264.
So this fact actually places Touch HD even in deeper shit.Even XScale has better Video performance than that MSM 72XX shit, check out other Videos.
bgayts 2 years ago
Comment removed
Jedrzej009 2 years ago
Acer F900 is running Samsung S3C 6410 533 MHz processor which has DivX/XViD support.
HTC Touch HD is running Qualcomm MSM 7201A 528 MHz processor which not support DivX/XViD.
What a stupid comparison, it's like you are telling me that a bird can fly but cow cant.
WTF dude.. we all know that shit for like 50 years ago.
Samsung chipset is officially support DivX/XViD !!
Fuckn useless 4 mins of my life (Plus typing comment)
vosszaa 2 years ago 2
You are telling everyone you are an idiot over the internet. Codec support is on windows mobile system not on chip. DIVX are not supported on ACER F900 smartass, You must have seen other SAMSUNG phone model that are supporting DIVX/XVID codec like the i900 omnia which uses INTEL chip. even if the system is with the codec,it must have a faster processor to playback a high res video
50yrs ago divx aint out you moron
if you are reading this comment, i totally had the time of your useless life.
buaydianway 2 years ago
while the comparsion is to tell others what you spend you could have spend it on something better at lower price even
buaydianway 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL keep crying.. fag boi
vosszaa 2 years ago
what a fake=))) i play on my HD same video and it's very smooth u suck man
andrebudy 2 years ago
yeah yeah,watever~ owner of HD, Diamond 2, Pro 2 this is a fake out video for you all.
i have all the device & have been posting video about CPU comparsion. its ok for you all to comment & deceive yourself on what you have paid for.
to test the 720 video i used for this demo please download from the link provided on info
buaydianway 2 years ago
I agree bro, this happens on my Touch Pro but its the freaken Chip they use. Same for slow scrolling and so on. To get better playback, I use Core Player and its smooth as fuck but its sad I cant get it with Windows Media Player. I heard that Acer sucks though if your running multiple programs becuase of the limited ram. Is it true?
BIGAIRLIKE23 2 years ago
128MB is sufficient for many program but it depends on what program you are running, take for instant, TF3D, it will take away most of yr ram, that why hTC devices give more ram, but PC theory, if your CPU cannot handle fast processing, you need more buffering space, hence more RAM added to htc device when they using a slow CPU.
if you use coreplayer this video that i provide will not be smooth playing, do try it, even with Qtv driver, Qualcomm cannot handle well on high res video stiill
buaydianway 2 years ago
what is the video size?? Encoded? MP4? Well im saying cuz I run a MP4 (320X400) I believe and its really nice on core player compared to Windows Media Player on my Touch Pro. I heard that its limited Ram sucks if your running their new Today Home Screen cu its like TOUCH FLO 3D and it sucks it ram up. I have touch flo 3d disabled and run Spb Mobile Shell 3 so I can get better performance and it does.
BIGAIRLIKE23 2 years ago
my res is 720x480 for the video. coreplayer is a 3rd party app, usually for the test,we must have a OUT-OF-BOX ready condition, in term of rom customization, Windows Media Player must be ready & able to access any video driver on board.
coreplayer provides a more detail on benchmark, just play the clip u have & open media properties to see your dropped frame & played fps.
buaydianway 2 years ago
all User Interface takes up much RAM, as you depends on it to operate the phone. of coz 1 UI is enff. for me i use O2 themes, the rest is not needed.
as Acer rom is customize for its own UI, its wil take away your ram the moment you have it running, user can still unload the UI in settings
if we are able to cook the rom we can have a better control on memory, what to run & what to delete
buaydianway 2 years ago
I hope the Omnia HD doesnt have these problems like the Touch HD. I need to start seeing a Tegra phone or fuxk Windows Mobile 6.5, we need 7 dont u agree man? I had the custom 6.5 rom on my touch pro and went back to 6.1
BIGAIRLIKE23 2 years ago