Hehehe, I love fucking with you guys. I looked it up afterwards, and you are right, they were all British the folks who burnt down your white house. My bad.
As for The Star Spangled Banner, it's boring as fuck. Your national anthem is tired and lame. harmonically lacking in character in almost every way possible. Oh Canada may not be a paragon of Compositional brilliance, but at least it's interesting to listen to; but that's an opinion and I am rather biased... :)
Canada didn't burn down the white house, Britain did. Canada was only a British colony at the time so they can't claim credit for something the ruling government, which they didn't have the balls to kick out, did.
@shivityshank The guys who burnt down the White House were all Canadian born and bred. About the lack of balls comment, don't be an ass; you guys are far more British then we ever were, even your national anthem started out as a British drinking club's sobriety test, all you did was change the words... At least we wrote both the words and the music to our national anthem. BTW, My Country Tis Of Thee is God Save the Queen also with new words. Lazy Early Americans...
@Lacivicus *massive facepalm* no lol, the royal marines, 4th regiment of foot, 21st regiment, 44th regiment, and 85th regiment were all, in fact, from the British Isles lol. They were neither born nor raised in canada. No, we arent more british, although we have more british descendants YOU have the higher percentage. YOU have the monarch head of state, YOU have parliament, YOU have titles, and YOU are still in the british dominion--sorry commonwealth
@oJKBo Correct me if I'm wrong but were not the Royal Marines mostly freed slaves Cochrane recruited & the ships had many Canadians in their crews who had both volunteered & been impressed in to service.
Also the National issue is not particularly relevant.
With the same Queen all Canadians are effectively subjects of the same British Queen & the burning was done at the request & on behalf of the colony of Canada.
@Eddythebeast666 you are thinking of the corps of colonial marines. Well no lol, if not for the UK none of it would have happened. First the war wouldnt have happened without the UK, but even if it did the US would easily take canada and our white house would be fine. Saying canadians burnt the white house because canadians are brits is like saying squares burnt down the white house when it was really rectangles.
@oJKBo Yes but we are British subjects because of our Queen. If the UK had never been an Empire the US would be French/Dutch/Spanish. The US is a prodigal son of the Empire you wouldn't exist ether with out UK intervention. Your point is petty & childish argumentativeness. What would the UK have been with out its colonies seems a dumb question. What would the US be if it hadn't stolen Native lands?
You keep splitting off Canada to as a separate identity more out of spite the accuracy.
@Eddythebeast666 what? do you understand that squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares? all canadians were british subjects, not all british subjects or citizens were canadian. The men who burnt the white house were as canadian as they were south african (cape colony was under british possession then). I never asked those questions or raised the points youre talking about.
@Lacivicus no, it wasnt a sobriety test or a drinking club, it was a club where amateur musicians met, there was drinking, but it wasnt a bunch of poor peasants drinking with friends in a bar. We know these things you idiot. Nonetheless, o canada is a shitty song and you are a massive fucktard
@Lacivicus well excuse me for being offensive commenting on a video that is Canadians insulting America which they have no backing up or gounds to do :P
@twbgx2 Yes. It was called York at the time. Washington wouldn't have been touched as civilian targets were against the conventions of war but after the Americans burned York/Toronto there wasn't much point in following rules if the other side wasn't going to do the same.
@twbgx2 Yeah but Toronto was a tiny colony back then plus it was right on our border. You guys had to literally take a boat across the river to be there. We had to sail down and march through half your country to burn D.C. and Boston.
Why you gotta steal my video, dude? Why? 128,480 hits for something you had nothing to do with, when my (you know, official) version sits unwatched. Lame dude, lame.
@DaleWF10 yes you're right. They were a contingent of royal marines and regulars from the duke of wellington's army, who were transfered directly from serving in the peninsular war. They destroyed the american army defending the city at Bladensburg and then marched on washington, and burnt it down
@Eddythebeast666 By April 1814, Napoleon had been defeated and was exiled to the island of Elba. Large numbers of British troops were free to be sent to North America a brigade under Major General Robert Ross, consisting entirely of veterans from the army of the Duke of Wellington, was transported to Chesapeake Bay to effect a diversion on the coasts of the United States of America in favor of the army employed in the defence of Upper and Lower Canada
@Eddythebeast666 Canada might be british but they didn't burn the white house down, the Duke of Wellingtons regimant now named the yorkshire regimant where based in Halifax, west yorkshire. They served on the continent of Europe then got drafted over to North America after the defeat of Napoleon the army had never even been to North America before!
@DaleWF10 So there were no North American born British in the Ranks?
Britain only Impressed American Citizens for the war with Napoleon no Colony born British subjects were called upon nor any attempt made to recruit from the North American colonies?
The 44th Regiment of Foot did serve in the French and Indian War and in the American Revolution (Yes I Know 30 years would have seen a lot of changes in the ranks) but you can hardly say they had no history here.
@Eddythebeast666 I am not trying to say that just the regiment that burned down the White house was the Duke of Wellington regiment!
All of the people in this Regiment was recruited from the Yorkshire towns of Halifax, Huddersfield, Leeds, York and other towns/villages of the county of Yorkshire which is in the north of England
There was not a single North American born soldier in the 4,250 that landed in Chesapeake Bay defeated america at the Battle of Bladensburg then burned Washington!
@Eddythebeast666 there were no canadian militia involved in the burning of washignton at all.however north americans, french, spanish, just about anyone might have been drafted or pressed into british army ranks. But no specifically canadian units were involved. The army that attacked washington was a division of Royal Marines, and 6,000 veterans from the Peninsular war
There were no Canadian units because Canada was not a separate entity. All Canadians = British. Yes even the French Canadians.
The entire British force fought in defense of the British colony of Canada.
The force that sacked Washington was only there to force the Yanks to stop attacking Canada.
Now no disrespect intended to those who risked their lives on behalf of a colony not yet a Nation but if the UK isn't going to sing their praises we will.
@dmax631 Now no disrespect intended to those who risked their lives (Where ever they came from) on behalf of a colony not yet a Nation but if the UK isn't going to sing their praises we will be overjoyed to claim them as ours.
@Eddythebeast666 " if the UK isn't going to sing their praises we will be overjoyed to claim them as ours."
what kind of nonsense is that? ok, the cave men aren't here to sing their praises, we will be overjoyed to claim them as ours. American invented the wheel (sing, sing sing )
@TheImperialistStates Canada wasnt a country in 1812, so there was no Canadian infantry, the british burned downt eh white house but this included many future Canadians.... stupid w/e nation your from
@TheImperialistStates Still there was no Canadian militia, there was no Canada at all! A lot troops in the battle of 1812 were already stationed at a varety of forts outside what america took, many of them stayed after and later became part of Canada when it was actually created... So the british burnt the white house down but many ended up becoming Canadians... maybe ur history books think Canada was created before the british even came to north america, who knows
@draconite420 The people who came from the Canadian region were considered Canadian...Just like the British colonists in America were considered Americans, even though the United States didn't exist yet. The people who led the attack never became Canadians, one died during the war, the other went back to Britain and died there. The troops who were there, were the regulars who came from Britain, not the one who came from the Canadian region of North American.
@mrfwest Canadians were & are British same Queen. The burning was done on our behalf as a direct result of the US invasion of Canada. Your statement is the type of petty nitpicking typical of poor sports & sore losers.
@Eddythebeast666 it not nitpicking, its facts. Canada and it citizens were just living British territory. by your stupid logic, India ( britten territory ww2 ) could take credit for England ww2 achievements.- or gwam can take credit for the u.s beating japan -
maybe France can take credit for winning ww2- because we were all allies and we fought on France behalf
@mrfwest No it would be like Ronald Reagan taking credit for the British actions of William Penn as if he was American when the man died generations before the American revolution.
Nov. 28, 1984 Reagan, upon an Act of Congress by Presidential Proclamation 5284 declared William Penn and his second wife, Hannah Callowhill Penn, each to be an Honorary Citizen of the USA.
Your small minded petty nitpicking is contemptible. Go home Yankee
Did France lose WW2? I seem to recall them being on our side?
@Eddythebeast666 " Ronald Reagan taking credit for the British actions of William Penn......Penn and his second wife, Hannah Callowhill Penn, each to be an Honorary Citizen of the USA"
look up the word " honorary" idiot and i said France was on our side... wtf are you talking about? i not from new york so im not not Yankee but, i would to be... some of them get paid millions
@mrfwest It would be like calling Thanksgiving an American tradition when harvest celebrations are as old as human history & the 1st so called event that the USA cites as inspiration was by British colonists with the flimsiest connection to the USA.
It would be like taking credit for athletic performances by people who have not yet completed American citizenship.
@Eddythebeast666 " Thanksgiving an American tradition when harvest celebrations are as old as human history "
what does that have to do with anything. thanksgiving is an American tradition because there future children later became American- if any other countries want to have a " thanksgiving they have to call it some thing else
Loyalist that moved to Canada after the revolutionary war were every bit as descended from those same people at the first thanksgiving as any American.
They lost their homes but kept giving thanks. They kept Thanksgiving as is our right.
As is our right to celebrate the burning of your White-house.
@Eddythebeast666 " descended from those same people at the first thanksgiving as any American. "
yeah, but the event that inspired thanksgiving didn't happen on Canadian soil ( natives feeding colonist )
...but lets use your logic, Americans are descended from those same people that lived during mid-evil times. so it is every Americans right to claim and celebrate king author?
Canada make up his because they are in Americas shadow - Canada ( silly Americans )
@mrfwest You think you don't celebrate King Author? Hell man you make more movies about him then we do. When was the last time you heard him with a British accent? No renaissance fairs in the USA?
Do you have any idea how little of your culture is of your own making?
You stand on the shoulders of giants & act as if it was your stature that elevated you.
Then mock us for celebrating our heroes.
There is a word for people like that & it isn't flattering.
@TwistedComplex you only have the fifty-something stars cause you couldent think of using a red leaf. aside from the representation of the states and stuff...
Canadians see the entire 1812 war as ours. Quite obviously even the disastrous Battle of New Orleans strikes a cord as this song uses elements the US song of the same name. The British solders who died in New Orleans died on our behalf to force the USA to give up plans of conquering Canada. They are our Champions having given their lives for a British colony not yet a nation. We don't care where they were born they fought for Canada.
@majeta8 Thanks. False flagging is a problem on Youtube they haven't quite resolved yet. Who ever did it will discover the option doesn't work for them any more if they do it too often especially if some one hits the Not Spam button afterwards.
Rule Britannia! We only burned the white house due to the fact you burned the Canadian Parliament building. Unlike that traitor to-the-crown Tony Blair I respect this fact, and fin this song hilarious! Best of wishes to all of our friends in the colonies!
and just on a side note i hate how this song doesnt mention how the british who did the burning then lost at Baltimore and how their leader was killed
@watcher792 The War Hawks in congress were from the SW States. The Federalists States were the ones most affected by Impressment & they voted against the war. Also if the war had continued any longer those States were ready to leave the USA as proven by the Hartford Convention. The real reason for the war was the British Slave Trade Act 1807 which the USA insisted on compensation for your property that Briton had freed as proven by Artical V of the treaty of Ghent.
@Eddythebeast666 the only state prepared to seceed was New England and Britain was hurt by the war as well they traded with the United States alot the war hurt their commerce and they were people not property but in the end all countries have had their mistakes we learn from those and go towards a better future there were other reasons for the war other than that but hey lets just forget it it was about 200 years ago
@watcher792 We didn't start the war. We made every effort to end it even compensating the USA for the cost of the slaves we freed. We can't learn from mistakes if we never admit we made them. You guys turned your history in to myth & thoughtlessly portray us as 2D stereotypical villains. Then act surprised when we are insulted. You get respect when you act respectful. The US is anything but. We know what crimes we committed in our history that is histories most important lesson.
@watcher792 As for your side note, Taking glee in killing British? You are quite the hate filled bastard aren't you? This is a joke song about burning buildings you twisted psychopath, not killing Americans. Try to develop a slightly human perspective before spewing your bile on good natured comedy clips here on Youtube.
@Eddythebeast666 there is no glee in killing any human beings and i am not a psycopath (i had a psycharatrist check and i found that i am apperantly racist against muslims but nothing else) its not exactly good natured they are making fun of a war that killed hundreds of people where is the fun in that?
@watcher792 It's not exactly good natured to expect people of Canada & the UK to stand respectfully at your national anthem celebrating a battle victory over us is it? The kind of thing an immature, petty, arrogant, vain & rather pathetic nation might do. I could see Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi or Hugo Chávez acting like that but I expect better from the US. This joke song is aimed directly at that arrogance we precive in the USA. Are we wrong? Did anyone down there consider how insulting you are?
the war wasnt over taking canada it was because the british were pressing americans into their navy wanting some northwest territory was also part of it but the main part was because they were providing native americans with weapons to attack united states places and they were also restriciting american trade because of their war with Napolean in the end lets just forget the hatred it was years ago people we are allies now
@watcher792 USA = 2,260 killed in action. British 1,600 killed in action. That was the cost in lives but that doesn't mean squat as to who won. Victory is achieving your goals. When news of the end of Impressment arrived the British called an armistice hoping to end the war. The USA used it to amass troops for a second assault. So Impressment was an excuse not a reason. Natives had every right to defend their lands & Briton had total control of the seas when the war ended. The USA #FAIL
@Eddythebeast666 the british did the same thing and i added that to show the cost of war on both sides i also added in the british killed by disease the british had actually lost more sea battles then they won but that was because of a new kind of ships like old ironsides that was the reason for it and both sides did technically reach some of their goals but all in all without this war the United States and Britain would never have become close allies ironically enough
@watcher792 Then you should have added 15,000 to the american side. As for the sea battles Britons bests ships were busy blockading France till late in the war. Ships like the Guerriere were actually French. The technical innovations of your ships did give an advantage for the type of war you started with but if you want your historical opinions to be taken seriously avoid hype. What goal did did Briton have aside from forcing the US to halt your attacks?
@Eddythebeast666 the only real loser in that war was the native americans im not proud of what my country did to them but that was the past time to go forward with the future
@DJonX7 I didn't say I was ashamed. Just that is sucks, as in we got the crappy end of the stick sucks but thank you for the moral boost. Right back at ya.
@DJonX7 No link that I'm aware of but he is revered. I can trace back to 1680 Mi'kmaq/French Arcadian on my mothers side & British loyalist slave owners in Colonial America late 1700's
i imagine usa would not invade canada in modern times seeing as usa lost wars to poor countries like iraq and vietnam, they have the weapons, but they just dont know how to fight, they are soft i guess.
@Love4SK what the hell are you talking about we didnt lose to Iraq and if you think Americans dont know how to fight we have only ever lost one war and that would be Vietnam and if we had stayed we would have won it was just all the whiners back stateside that stopped us from doing so
@200357846 When a corporation owns more assets abroad then in the nation of origin they tend to have more loyalty to the investment then the nation where they came from. Last time I checked corporations from both our nations were getting pretty tight with Mexico & China.
@gododoof ... Umm... America isn't going to invade Canada again.... Yeah, it's a really nice place from, what I've heard.... Why would hate us so much?
@gododoof Okay look dude, learn your shit. First off, America wouldn't invade Canada, we're fucking allied. Secondly, I doubt Canada will invade US because a bunch of police officers with batons isn't exactly an ARMY. But hey, that doesn't mean you can't fly down here and light it on fire. Because I would love to see an internet badass like you try. So please, next time you make a post, Atleast know what your talking about!
@Aragni96 lol buddy, he was makin a joke. up here were pretty chill. but go ahead, make fun of our army, hell, take shots at our police force, jus remember that the reason we dont need an army is cuz we have no need for it. were genuinly happy NOT invadin other contries or startin fights. weve got world class peace keepers and makers. take a page outta ur good natured friends from seattles book an jus laugh. way to go seattle! breakin the steriotype that americans r ignorant an cant take a joke.
The War of 1812 was basically Canada’s War of Independence. Between 1812 and 1814, Canada won the right to not be American. The Americans think they won it. They’re right. Not in a military sense of course. On the battlefield, the Americans lost. . But war is after all a political tool, and what counts in the end are the long term results, not individual heroics.The United States lost a war and won a conference.
A funny video attracting racists? I would imagine such genious' have never of the practical problems of induction in epistemology and logic. Such a problem leads to conclusions who have more to do with ignorance then science. It's the twenty-first goddam century! I know science books arent popular down in texas, but take your head out of your ass once in a while! Lucky those racist retards live in the US, cause in canada, regardless of its many flaws, you get beat up for speaking like the klan.
Trust me I do not want to related to natives and the idea being gentically similiar to such a brain dead group of people makes me wish you are right, but you are not
You could have just stated you were unaware of your genetic background and I would accept that, however you make the false claim that racial classifications are no longer used and are outdated despite the fact it is used and supported by some of the most regarded Genetists of our time. Sorry you are nnativeot
@ShayisWY I know it is still used but not by anyone respected in the True Genetics field. The whole science was thrown out do to the political nightmares it created but some of bastards kept going with it even today using it as a legidmising element for bad policy. There was an excelent artical done on human migration patterns & all the branches of humanity. They pointed out that humanity started in Africa which has more genectic divercity then all the seperate braches combined.
@Eddythebeast666 For you to imply the teachings of Suzuki, Maynard, Savantes, not to mention the deptartment of genetics at Cambridge university, Lewis of CIT who is nobel prize winner are not reputable or respected in the Genetics community shows you have no idea what you are talking about. Pffft David Suzuki and Lewis....what a bunch of idiots and Cambridge University. Who ever heard of cambridge - What kind of shitty academics go there.....almost as bad as Harvard.
@ShayisWY Bah! God damn it man then don't listen to me look it up your self. Think for your self. Honestly there are idiots pushing intelagent design in school trying to rework creationisum in to legidamcy again. The use of those terms are no longer scientific like "Animal, vegitable, mineral" used to be scientific catagories. We trace genetic families by the orignal migrational routes. The Racial feature catagories are throw backs to when all we had was physical apperance to catigorize by.
@Eddythebeast666 As for the last part - I am not talking about outside physical traits at all and more of polymorpisms. Race is not all about physical traits as you so wrongfully state. Race identifiers utilize multiple scientific disicplines - again we use DNA to determine exact race of a unidentifiable bodies...DNA racial printing is 99.999999% accurate. As for migration you again defeated your own argument and proved me right. All living things orginate from the same bacteria cell and yet
@Eddythebeast666 and yet we are no where close to be being the same. We have 100,0000 's of species of living creatures on this earth and yet you imply we are the same. You state many idiea regarding racial genetics are not accepted or taught --- this is why we have whole new evolving fields based on that exact same premise such as pharmacologic and pharmacogenomic diciplines to name a few. And this is why these fields have showing astounding results
@Eddythebeast666 As for creationism....and there are idiots who believe a Canadian invented Insulin, lightbulb among others........ I am not talking about the origin of species as this is a whole new topic. Furthermore evolution only further confirms the racial theory. Furthermore creationism is partly based on how we are all equal or the same not how we are different. Hence the term we are all equal in the eyes of the lord. Evolution handly disproves creationism and the idea we are all the same
@ShayisWY I'm not sure if we ever claim to have invented artificial insulin but we did create the light bulb. If you look it up the original patent for the light bulb was by two Canadians who then sold it to Edison who changed a few slight things to create the light bulb we know today.
@curlerdude Canadians did not invent the light bulb either Shay or Shaw from GB who is credited with this,.
Not don't get me wrong as I am not saying Canadians don't event good things. My favourite is Bio Steel which is an Amazing Canadian invention. I am just highlighting the popular inventions we claim, but had nothing to do with
@drmexicanmahoney1 Alexander Graham Bell was not Canadian and vacatoned at this vacation home in Baddeck Nova Scotia. Which I add is a beautiful place. Bell was never Canadian and in fact refused Canadian citizenship. The phone was pantetned in the US in Washington DC and the first call took place between Boston and Cambridge.
@Eddythebeast666 Going baclk further ....all living thingsl started from the same bacteria cell. Does not mean I am the same as a dog or a python. Humans are off different races and the DNA theory confirms this and not discredit this. Hence why we are able to run DNA tests on unidentifiable bodies, especially burnt or liquified and use the DNA to determine the exact race. If there was no such thing as race then how can we run DNA tests to determine race?
US won because we got New Orleans at the end, the gate to the west. As for the burning of Washington: Congratulations 'you' razed a swamp we were in the middle of renovating. We burnt down Toronto, that's the New York of Canada so HA! our pillaging was better! :P
Besides we kicked 'your' asses at Baltimore and forced 'you' to retreat shortly after the razing of DC.
Still your militia fought bravely and pushed us back to our country eventually so power to ya Canada.
@spoonman197 In 1812 Toronto was called York. The Amercans abandoned the conventions of war looted & burned non military buildings. They used tactics nomally reserved for clearing Native tribes. Burning whole towns like Newark leaving populations homeless with out food in the begining of winter. It would have been more merrciful to have killed the populations directly. The USA made a song about this war in to their anthem so we would have to stand resectfully as they celebrate the butchery.
@fads90 Your nation abandoned the conventions of war looted & burned non military buildings. They used tactics nomally reserved for clearing Native tribes. Burning whole towns like Newark leaving populations homeless with out food in the begining of winter. It would have been more merrciful to have killed the populations directly. You guys made a song about this war in to your anthem so we would have to stand resectfully as you celebrate the butchery.
@Eddythebeast666 I don't think war conventions were around back then, so i find it unfair to say that our razing of some towns was a war crime. Besides you people were British back then and god knows the British Empire wasn't short on razing towns in foreign countries even after the war of 1812.
As for our anthem, it was about the defense of Fort McHenry, a fort that is VERY MUCH in United States territory so it's more of a defending homeland song than a YAY we made people Freeze to death song
@fads90 Your nation has a list of non-antagonistic beautiful songs. From your orignal anthem (If a bit religious for a secular nation) to This land is my land to any number of other songs. I'm sure there was good reasons for picking a war related song but keep in mind it does more then just define the USA as a nation to those who are American, it defines who you are as a people those of us who are not. Fort McHenry was retaliation. Canada has done our share of sins as British & on our own.
@fads90 Governor-General Sir George Prevost of Canada wrote to the Admirals in Bermuda calling for a retaliation for the American sacking of York and requested their permission and support in the form of provision of naval resources. At the time, it was considered against the civilized laws of war to burn a non-military facility and the Americans had not only burned the Parliament but also looted and burned the Governor's mansion, private homes and warehouses.
@fads90 also you may have gotten New Orleans but you also want the border to be on the 59th parallel and instead it ended on the 49th - as you can plainly see there were some wins and loses for both sides and the war ended in a tie
@Eddythebeast666 The annexation of Canada was never an objective of the war of 1812 and the reflective in the very few armed men used in few dozen sporadic battles spread over years. - Hardly an invasionary force considering the US had nearly 1/2 million armed personell at their disposal.
You say Canada won, but yet with the Boundary Commision agreed upon by GB and USA, it had established through independant arbitrators such as the King of Netherlands that GB was wrongfully occupying US land
@ShayisWY Yeah & killing all the Natives was never your plan ether you just wanted to stop them from fighting back. Listen up maggot Briton wanted nothing they were buisy with Napolion. To keep the peace they even ended impressment so you didn't even get that by going to war. That was won with diplomicy. Briton came kicked your asses then went back to clean up Europe. Once Napolion was defeated they didn't care about your trading with France & they had never been encourageing the Natives.
@Eddythebe. First of all shit for brains I am not American, but an immigrant to Canada who is commenting on the obessive and narcisistic behaviour of born Canadians.. Funny how you mention Native treatment was GB back in the day was chastized for native treatment and recently there has been multiple UN notes condemming Canadian treatment of its native population. Be carefull when you start pointing fingers as you may find a few pointing back
@ShayisWY I am aware of the issues Native peoples have in Canada thank you. I'm sorry you got lured here... very sorry. As a local Native I'm also sorry we don't meet your high expectations. Looks like you will be using Canada as a gateway to the USA don't let the door hit you on your way. I thought it was spelt Mongolian. What ever.
@Eddythebeast666 Clearly you are not, it's not matter of expectations or anything like that. It is born Canadians are a people not honest with themselves about themselves or the world around them. They run Americans through the ringer for being stupid when born Canadians are less literate and less educated than the typical American. Not to mention how less innovative we are. BTW it is Mongloid, as a mongloid yourself you should have known this......I smell BS
@ShayisWY Nobody uses that term not since the 70's eugenics pesudo science was discredited. Simalar to "Negro" the word was missaplied as a defining charicterisic of race. So where ever you getting your education from it's 30 years out of date. There has been far to much interbreeding among races to use such terms as there is no such thing as a pure stock Mongloid Negro or Caucasun. Never really has been. You might just as well create a racal class by eye or hair color.
@Eddythebeast666 Mongloid is widely used, especially in the field of genetics....it is not a Eugencis you dumb shit for brains born Canadian . The world is classified into sevarl races of which Mongloids is one. There has been and was inbreeding in thsi world, but at highests estimates at highest times constituted 1-2% of births not enough to nulify the mongloid race as indistinguisable. Furthermore in order for your idea to be valid, it would require incestial inter - racial inbreeding......
@ShayisWY I'm telling you racal clasifacation is bogus. If races can interbreed then there is only one race. Dogs vary widely in apperance but are known as breeds not seperate races. ANY attemp at legidimising the catagorising physical of charicteristics in to racal profiles was discredited FOR DAMN GOOD REASON after the forced steralazation programs. Genetics science was compleatly reworked to remove all the Eugenics elements. We have since mapped human DNA. What you are talking about outofdate
@Eddythebeast666 You are stating a personal opinion and nothing more so quit presenting as scientific fact as 1 you are not a genetist and 2 Genetics in terms of race is VERY widely accepted. You are lying your ass off to imply racial genetics is no longer accepted, nor is taught in schools when the most popular and respected genetists support the idea we are of differnet races. You are making the argument that people cannot racial profile as the same race theory is no longer accepted by science
@Eddythebeast666 racial gentics are routinely taught in the finest education institutes of this world.
As for breed and race.....these are biologically equivelant terms you idiot.
Mitochondrial DNA has confirmed we are almost all identical, but we are more than 50% genetically similiar to fish, over 90% similiar to cats, 60% to fruit flies, 90% similiar to mice. Mitochondrial DNA confirms the race theory and at best notes there are more sub races than previously accepted.
Now just because we share 90% of the genes with a mouse means in no way we are 90% similiar. As even though we have like genes, there are genomic length, chromosomal division, among hordes of other factors that come into play other than just simply having similiar genes.
@ShayisWY Divercity is everything. The racial features that everyone has been so hung up on are almost meaningless in genetic science. Natives who crossed the landsbridge only had someting like 40 or 50 genetic fore barers to populate the contenant yet over the thousands of years divercified in well enough to be distinct. There is very little divercity between White Cacasuns & Mongloid while Negro has easily 20X what we have.
@Eddythebeast666 There is also little difference between us and mice, rice, moose, monkeys among others. You completely forget Genomic sequence and chromosonal division plays into our physical and mental differencesquite. Oh yes quit copying and pasting articles that you are taking out of context especially in regards to mitochondrial DNA theory. 4 hours ago you had no idea what the word Mongloid meant and indirectrly asked me. Now you are portraying yourself as an expert.
@ShayisWY Furthermore as discover and research more polymorphisms we discover there are key differences between races. This has also been used to develop pharmacologic and pharmacogenomic medicines that treat specifically on race. It has been provem over and over and over again pharmacologic and pharmacogenomic medicine are highly effective in treatment. Again there was no differences in races - how is this possible?
...... as for the this last part think about how it contradicst each other, hence you defeated your own arguement. Mongloid is a term discredited and no longer used? really so this is why some of the most popular people in this field from Suzuki, Maynard, Savante right through to Grey's Antonomy routinely use the term and idea.? You are grabbing at straws
@ShayisWY Culture is the defining standard now there is no pretease of science to clasifaction terms. You could be as dark as coal but if you put on a suit & play the market you are White Bread. Does not matter how pale you are if you listen to rap you will be seen as a Wigger. It's still bigotry every bit as bad as racisum but at least the lie that its based upon science has been discredited.
@Eddythebeast666 Cutlure and race are two seperate terms and multiple cultures exist in single race. England has many different cultures within its small land. If I am Gaelic does not mean I am of a different race than someone who is Welsh. There are different races in the world, we are not one race of people as confirmed by the most reputable gentists of our time.
...GB conceded and gave land to the US. Really 1812 is a war that is regarded as the war both sides won given the concessions given by both. For you to imply Canada won outright is plain ignorance.....actually Canada could never win as no such country existed back then
@ShayisWY lol there was no winner..it was a tie..but if you really wanted a winner, it would be the "Canadians" aka (arguably) the metis , French, Natives and Brits just because they achieved their goal to defend their homeland but there was no territorial difference so everyone is calling it a tie, these guys were the ones who decided to give Canadians a more nationalist pride..and that's great, it braught Canadians closer to their homeland (:
@Rey123Duncan Both sides won as concessions were achieved from both . As for no territory, again through the boundary commision and through the king of Netherlands it was established that the GB were wrongully occupying US land. GB conceeded and gave up land.
As for Canadian pride, indeed as there are things we should be proud of 1812 considering some great battle victories and concessions. However some of our pride is based on misconceptions...... The same also be said of the US as well
Crap sorry -before I posted it.
bomvouage 4 weeks ago
@Vidzstreamer sorry your right did not think that through beforev
bomvouage 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now it is time to deport all those US military deserters back to America. We do not want those yankee cowards here sucking up our tax dollars!
westernoutlaw 1 month ago
Now it is time to deport all those US military deserters back to America. We do not want those yankee cowards here sucking up our tax dollars!
westernoutlaw 1 month ago
@Eddythebeast666 You're referring to the Marines as if they where British, but the Marines are American and always have been American.
BTW I'm completely American but still love this song.
bomvouage 1 month ago
@bomvouage
Er no ... the British have Marines also ...
rabbig01 1 month ago
@bomvouage
Get your facts right.
The UK's Royal Marines were formed in 1664.
The United States Marine Corps were formed in 1775.
Therefore, how can marines 'always have been American' if Britain had them a hundred and eleven years before the US?
Vidzstreamer 1 month ago
americans are communists, i got my .22 always on guard..
1988scottcarey 3 months ago
Hehehe, I love fucking with you guys. I looked it up afterwards, and you are right, they were all British the folks who burnt down your white house. My bad.
As for The Star Spangled Banner, it's boring as fuck. Your national anthem is tired and lame. harmonically lacking in character in almost every way possible. Oh Canada may not be a paragon of Compositional brilliance, but at least it's interesting to listen to; but that's an opinion and I am rather biased... :)
Fucktard? really?
Lacivicus 4 months ago
Didn't the Arrogant Worms write this song? Who the Hell are these guys?
Lacivicus 4 months ago
Look either way it's kinda funny that they burned down the white and left just to trol them they where all like "u mad bro"
MeltingSunFilms 4 months ago
Canada didn't burn down the white house, Britain did. Canada was only a British colony at the time so they can't claim credit for something the ruling government, which they didn't have the balls to kick out, did.
shivityshank 4 months ago
@shivityshank The guys who burnt down the White House were all Canadian born and bred. About the lack of balls comment, don't be an ass; you guys are far more British then we ever were, even your national anthem started out as a British drinking club's sobriety test, all you did was change the words... At least we wrote both the words and the music to our national anthem. BTW, My Country Tis Of Thee is God Save the Queen also with new words. Lazy Early Americans...
Lacivicus 4 months ago
@Lacivicus *massive facepalm* no lol, the royal marines, 4th regiment of foot, 21st regiment, 44th regiment, and 85th regiment were all, in fact, from the British Isles lol. They were neither born nor raised in canada. No, we arent more british, although we have more british descendants YOU have the higher percentage. YOU have the monarch head of state, YOU have parliament, YOU have titles, and YOU are still in the british dominion--sorry commonwealth
oJKBo 4 months ago
@oJKBo Correct me if I'm wrong but were not the Royal Marines mostly freed slaves Cochrane recruited & the ships had many Canadians in their crews who had both volunteered & been impressed in to service.
Also the National issue is not particularly relevant.
With the same Queen all Canadians are effectively subjects of the same British Queen & the burning was done at the request & on behalf of the colony of Canada.
If not for Canada none of it would have happened.
Eddythebeast666 2 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 you are thinking of the corps of colonial marines. Well no lol, if not for the UK none of it would have happened. First the war wouldnt have happened without the UK, but even if it did the US would easily take canada and our white house would be fine. Saying canadians burnt the white house because canadians are brits is like saying squares burnt down the white house when it was really rectangles.
oJKBo 2 months ago
@oJKBo Yes but we are British subjects because of our Queen. If the UK had never been an Empire the US would be French/Dutch/Spanish. The US is a prodigal son of the Empire you wouldn't exist ether with out UK intervention. Your point is petty & childish argumentativeness. What would the UK have been with out its colonies seems a dumb question. What would the US be if it hadn't stolen Native lands?
You keep splitting off Canada to as a separate identity more out of spite the accuracy.
Eddythebeast666 2 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 what? do you understand that squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares? all canadians were british subjects, not all british subjects or citizens were canadian. The men who burnt the white house were as canadian as they were south african (cape colony was under british possession then). I never asked those questions or raised the points youre talking about.
oJKBo 2 months ago
@Lacivicus no, it wasnt a sobriety test or a drinking club, it was a club where amateur musicians met, there was drinking, but it wasnt a bunch of poor peasants drinking with friends in a bar. We know these things you idiot. Nonetheless, o canada is a shitty song and you are a massive fucktard
oJKBo 4 months ago
@Lacivicus well excuse me for being offensive commenting on a video that is Canadians insulting America which they have no backing up or gounds to do :P
shivityshank 4 months ago
@shivityshank I think I hear a sore loser
mowinckel10 3 months ago
@mowinckel10 Yep, I'm the loser alright.
shivityshank 3 months ago
They sound like stereotypical Canadians! Dumb ones, too, since they don't know their history.
CommonSense8102 5 months ago
@CommonSense8102 why dont you stop searching up canadian videos just so you can argue with someone
jpjustin101 4 months ago
LoL at 0.52
he said in the name of the queen.
King George III was the monarch at the time of the war of 1812.
bobslay12 5 months ago
Didn't Toronto get burnt...too?
twbgx2 6 months ago
@twbgx2 Yes. It was called York at the time. Washington wouldn't have been touched as civilian targets were against the conventions of war but after the Americans burned York/Toronto there wasn't much point in following rules if the other side wasn't going to do the same.
Eddythebeast666 6 months ago
@twbgx2 Yeah but Toronto was a tiny colony back then plus it was right on our border. You guys had to literally take a boat across the river to be there. We had to sail down and march through half your country to burn D.C. and Boston.
CanadianStereotype 5 months ago
Why you gotta steal my video, dude? Why? 128,480 hits for something you had nothing to do with, when my (you know, official) version sits unwatched. Lame dude, lame.
onedeadtroll 7 months ago 22
@onedeadtroll fatmandell upload date.....June 23, 2006. Yours...6 months ago...... :/
tjmfishing 4 months ago
@onedeadtroll you can get this video taken down by copywright claim. simple. if its your video. HE STOLE IT. flag this shit and report to youtube
khorn1994 1 month ago
4.000 British marched into america and burnt it to the ground not the candians!
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@DaleWF10 yes you're right. They were a contingent of royal marines and regulars from the duke of wellington's army, who were transfered directly from serving in the peninsular war. They destroyed the american army defending the city at Bladensburg and then marched on washington, and burnt it down
dmax631 7 months ago
@DaleWF10 So Canadians were not British? Why would the British care about Canada it's not as if the Yanks attacked The British isles?
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 By April 1814, Napoleon had been defeated and was exiled to the island of Elba. Large numbers of British troops were free to be sent to North America a brigade under Major General Robert Ross, consisting entirely of veterans from the army of the Duke of Wellington, was transported to Chesapeake Bay to effect a diversion on the coasts of the United States of America in favor of the army employed in the defence of Upper and Lower Canada
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@DaleWF10 Not my question.
My Question was who were all those English speaking people in Canada in 1812?
Were they British or not?
Because I'm not sure why we have Queen Elizabeth II as head of state if we aren't British.
Should we tell Will & Kate to F@*K off?
Are we not British enough after centuries of Loyalty?
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
Comment removed
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 By that logic nether did the UK because you don't call your self British any more. #LOL
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 Canada might be british but they didn't burn the white house down, the Duke of Wellingtons regimant now named the yorkshire regimant where based in Halifax, west yorkshire. They served on the continent of Europe then got drafted over to North America after the defeat of Napoleon the army had never even been to North America before!
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@DaleWF10 So there were no North American born British in the Ranks?
Britain only Impressed American Citizens for the war with Napoleon no Colony born British subjects were called upon nor any attempt made to recruit from the North American colonies?
The 44th Regiment of Foot did serve in the French and Indian War and in the American Revolution (Yes I Know 30 years would have seen a lot of changes in the ranks) but you can hardly say they had no history here.
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 I am not trying to say that just the regiment that burned down the White house was the Duke of Wellington regiment!
All of the people in this Regiment was recruited from the Yorkshire towns of Halifax, Huddersfield, Leeds, York and other towns/villages of the county of Yorkshire which is in the north of England
There was not a single North American born soldier in the 4,250 that landed in Chesapeake Bay defeated america at the Battle of Bladensburg then burned Washington!
DaleWF10 7 months ago
@DaleWF10 And that matters?
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 there were no canadian militia involved in the burning of washignton at all.however north americans, french, spanish, just about anyone might have been drafted or pressed into british army ranks. But no specifically canadian units were involved. The army that attacked washington was a division of Royal Marines, and 6,000 veterans from the Peninsular war
dmax631 7 months ago
@dmax631 I seem have difficulty making my point.
There were no Canadian units because Canada was not a separate entity. All Canadians = British. Yes even the French Canadians.
The entire British force fought in defense of the British colony of Canada.
The force that sacked Washington was only there to force the Yanks to stop attacking Canada.
Now no disrespect intended to those who risked their lives on behalf of a colony not yet a Nation but if the UK isn't going to sing their praises we will.
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
@dmax631 Now no disrespect intended to those who risked their lives (Where ever they came from) on behalf of a colony not yet a Nation but if the UK isn't going to sing their praises we will be overjoyed to claim them as ours.
Cheers!!
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Eddythebeast666 " if the UK isn't going to sing their praises we will be overjoyed to claim them as ours."
what kind of nonsense is that? ok, the cave men aren't here to sing their praises, we will be overjoyed to claim them as ours. American invented the wheel (sing, sing sing )
cheers!!!
mrfwest 7 months ago
And Hiroshima burned, burned, buuuurned...hmm the American version doesn't sound as funny.
zmbymstr11 7 months ago 12
LMFAO I AM CANADIAN. and i kinda think its wrong1
The1990Emily 7 months ago
lol
tuncuscompsa was killed and those red bastards were kicked out of the USA
God Damn Canada
residentmagnum 8 months ago
"Then we went to Washington, and burnt down all his stuff" what? The British did that, not the Canadian militia. Stupid Canadians.
TheImperialistStates 8 months ago
@TheImperialistStates Canada wasnt a country in 1812, so there was no Canadian infantry, the british burned downt eh white house but this included many future Canadians.... stupid w/e nation your from
draconite420 8 months ago
@draconite420 I said militia moron not soldiers, nice try though ^_^.
TheImperialistStates 8 months ago
@TheImperialistStates Still there was no Canadian militia, there was no Canada at all! A lot troops in the battle of 1812 were already stationed at a varety of forts outside what america took, many of them stayed after and later became part of Canada when it was actually created... So the british burnt the white house down but many ended up becoming Canadians... maybe ur history books think Canada was created before the british even came to north america, who knows
draconite420 8 months ago
@draconite420 It was mostly Canadian militia.....
GrrrIamMad 7 months ago
@draconite420 The people who came from the Canadian region were considered Canadian...Just like the British colonists in America were considered Americans, even though the United States didn't exist yet. The people who led the attack never became Canadians, one died during the war, the other went back to Britain and died there. The troops who were there, were the regulars who came from Britain, not the one who came from the Canadian region of North American.
TheImperialistStates 7 months ago
@draconite420 no brittish troops burn down the white house, there were no Canadian ancestor involved. they weren't even trained for battle.
mrfwest 7 months ago
@mrfwest Canadians were & are British same Queen. The burning was done on our behalf as a direct result of the US invasion of Canada. Your statement is the type of petty nitpicking typical of poor sports & sore losers.
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago 2
@Eddythebeast666 it not nitpicking, its facts. Canada and it citizens were just living British territory. by your stupid logic, India ( britten territory ww2 ) could take credit for England ww2 achievements.- or gwam can take credit for the u.s beating japan -
maybe France can take credit for winning ww2- because we were all allies and we fought on France behalf
mrfwest 7 months ago
@mrfwest No it would be like Ronald Reagan taking credit for the British actions of William Penn as if he was American when the man died generations before the American revolution.
Nov. 28, 1984 Reagan, upon an Act of Congress by Presidential Proclamation 5284 declared William Penn and his second wife, Hannah Callowhill Penn, each to be an Honorary Citizen of the USA.
Your small minded petty nitpicking is contemptible. Go home Yankee
Did France lose WW2? I seem to recall them being on our side?
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago 2
@Eddythebeast666 " Ronald Reagan taking credit for the British actions of William Penn......Penn and his second wife, Hannah Callowhill Penn, each to be an Honorary Citizen of the USA"
look up the word " honorary" idiot and i said France was on our side... wtf are you talking about? i not from new york so im not not Yankee but, i would to be... some of them get paid millions
mrfwest 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrfwest "maybe France can take credit for winning ww2" That is what you said? Did you mean to say "Sole Credit"?
Now which nation is it that is arrogant enough to claim sole credit for winning WW2?
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago 2
@mrfwest It would be like calling Thanksgiving an American tradition when harvest celebrations are as old as human history & the 1st so called event that the USA cites as inspiration was by British colonists with the flimsiest connection to the USA.
It would be like taking credit for athletic performances by people who have not yet completed American citizenship.
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago 2
@Eddythebeast666 " Thanksgiving an American tradition when harvest celebrations are as old as human history "
what does that have to do with anything. thanksgiving is an American tradition because there future children later became American- if any other countries want to have a " thanksgiving they have to call it some thing else
mrfwest 7 months ago
@mrfwest No they don't.
Loyalist that moved to Canada after the revolutionary war were every bit as descended from those same people at the first thanksgiving as any American.
They lost their homes but kept giving thanks. They kept Thanksgiving as is our right.
As is our right to celebrate the burning of your White-house.
Suck it up. #LOL
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago 3
@Eddythebeast666 " descended from those same people at the first thanksgiving as any American. "
yeah, but the event that inspired thanksgiving didn't happen on Canadian soil ( natives feeding colonist )
...but lets use your logic, Americans are descended from those same people that lived during mid-evil times. so it is every Americans right to claim and celebrate king author?
Canada make up his because they are in Americas shadow - Canada ( silly Americans )
mrfwest 7 months ago
@mrfwest You think you don't celebrate King Author? Hell man you make more movies about him then we do. When was the last time you heard him with a British accent? No renaissance fairs in the USA?
Do you have any idea how little of your culture is of your own making?
You stand on the shoulders of giants & act as if it was your stature that elevated you.
Then mock us for celebrating our heroes.
There is a word for people like that & it isn't flattering.
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago 2
@Eddythebeast666 it doesn't matter if we celebrate king Arthur or not. what we cant do is say " king Arthur accomplishments and goal as ours.
" Do you have any idea how little of your culture is of your own making?" like what? no one has ever said 'renaissance fairs is our culture "
mrfwest 7 months ago
@mrfwest Do you speak English or American? #LOL
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 English and Spanish , but neither is American culture nor do we say it is
remember America doesn't have an official language
mrfwest 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
canadians burned the white house
we burned all of york and renamed it to toronto
fuck you, canada
TwistedComplex 8 months ago
@TwistedComplex you only have the fifty-something stars cause you couldent think of using a red leaf. aside from the representation of the states and stuff...
lordvolroc 7 months ago
@lordvolroc Well I think the Snake they used on some early flags was an interesting choice.
Eddythebeast666 7 months ago
Comment removed
TwistedComplex 8 months ago
Comment removed
TwistedComplex 8 months ago
This win belongs to the British
xIegionx 8 months ago
The Alamo was a battle not a war. The US won that war
Deathclok 8 months ago
Oh! Its the guy form the Loading Ready Run videos!
psychsuffix 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Canadians see the entire 1812 war as ours. Quite obviously even the disastrous Battle of New Orleans strikes a cord as this song uses elements the US song of the same name. The British solders who died in New Orleans died on our behalf to force the USA to give up plans of conquering Canada. They are our Champions having given their lives for a British colony not yet a nation. We don't care where they were born they fought for Canada.
During the world wars we fought for Britain.
Eddythebeast666 8 months ago 26
@Eddythebeast666 who ever flagged this comment has alot of balls, sadly no brains.
majeta8 8 months ago
@majeta8 Thanks. False flagging is a problem on Youtube they haven't quite resolved yet. Who ever did it will discover the option doesn't work for them any more if they do it too often especially if some one hits the Not Spam button afterwards.
Eddythebeast666 8 months ago
it was actually the british
iducatifan1 9 months ago
Rule Britannia! We only burned the white house due to the fact you burned the Canadian Parliament building. Unlike that traitor to-the-crown Tony Blair I respect this fact, and fin this song hilarious! Best of wishes to all of our friends in the colonies!
TruthApple88 9 months ago
@iducatifan1 Well duh, Canada is British Commonwealth.
Eddythebeast666 9 months ago
LOL. Canada wasn't even a country yet. It was a territory owned by England. Self righteous Canadians.
MiKeDpRoDuCtIoNs 9 months ago
clever canada very clever *enters codes into football* *note the foot ball is a suitcase with all the security code for all nukes the US has*
rvbsmcaboose 9 months ago
canada's other anthem .
canada fuck yeah!!!!!!!
willobi 9 months ago 2
Oh rubbing it in too. This is so humiliating.
jethrodassam 10 months ago
very funny Canada, very funny
covenent200 11 months ago
American lost to pork!
decxswx123 11 months ago
Comment removed
grampy77 11 months ago
and just on a side note i hate how this song doesnt mention how the british who did the burning then lost at Baltimore and how their leader was killed
watcher792 11 months ago
@watcher792 The War Hawks in congress were from the SW States. The Federalists States were the ones most affected by Impressment & they voted against the war. Also if the war had continued any longer those States were ready to leave the USA as proven by the Hartford Convention. The real reason for the war was the British Slave Trade Act 1807 which the USA insisted on compensation for your property that Briton had freed as proven by Artical V of the treaty of Ghent.
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 the only state prepared to seceed was New England and Britain was hurt by the war as well they traded with the United States alot the war hurt their commerce and they were people not property but in the end all countries have had their mistakes we learn from those and go towards a better future there were other reasons for the war other than that but hey lets just forget it it was about 200 years ago
watcher792 11 months ago
@watcher792 We didn't start the war. We made every effort to end it even compensating the USA for the cost of the slaves we freed. We can't learn from mistakes if we never admit we made them. You guys turned your history in to myth & thoughtlessly portray us as 2D stereotypical villains. Then act surprised when we are insulted. You get respect when you act respectful. The US is anything but. We know what crimes we committed in our history that is histories most important lesson.
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
@watcher792 As for your side note, Taking glee in killing British? You are quite the hate filled bastard aren't you? This is a joke song about burning buildings you twisted psychopath, not killing Americans. Try to develop a slightly human perspective before spewing your bile on good natured comedy clips here on Youtube.
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 there is no glee in killing any human beings and i am not a psycopath (i had a psycharatrist check and i found that i am apperantly racist against muslims but nothing else) its not exactly good natured they are making fun of a war that killed hundreds of people where is the fun in that?
watcher792 11 months ago
@watcher792 It's not exactly good natured to expect people of Canada & the UK to stand respectfully at your national anthem celebrating a battle victory over us is it? The kind of thing an immature, petty, arrogant, vain & rather pathetic nation might do. I could see Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi or Hugo Chávez acting like that but I expect better from the US. This joke song is aimed directly at that arrogance we precive in the USA. Are we wrong? Did anyone down there consider how insulting you are?
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
the war wasnt over taking canada it was because the british were pressing americans into their navy wanting some northwest territory was also part of it but the main part was because they were providing native americans with weapons to attack united states places and they were also restriciting american trade because of their war with Napolean in the end lets just forget the hatred it was years ago people we are allies now
Deaths
American forces: 2260
British Forces: 4921
watcher792 11 months ago
@watcher792 USA = 2,260 killed in action. British 1,600 killed in action. That was the cost in lives but that doesn't mean squat as to who won. Victory is achieving your goals. When news of the end of Impressment arrived the British called an armistice hoping to end the war. The USA used it to amass troops for a second assault. So Impressment was an excuse not a reason. Natives had every right to defend their lands & Briton had total control of the seas when the war ended. The USA #FAIL
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 the british did the same thing and i added that to show the cost of war on both sides i also added in the british killed by disease the british had actually lost more sea battles then they won but that was because of a new kind of ships like old ironsides that was the reason for it and both sides did technically reach some of their goals but all in all without this war the United States and Britain would never have become close allies ironically enough
watcher792 11 months ago
@watcher792 Then you should have added 15,000 to the american side. As for the sea battles Britons bests ships were busy blockading France till late in the war. Ships like the Guerriere were actually French. The technical innovations of your ships did give an advantage for the type of war you started with but if you want your historical opinions to be taken seriously avoid hype. What goal did did Briton have aside from forcing the US to halt your attacks?
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 the only real loser in that war was the native americans im not proud of what my country did to them but that was the past time to go forward with the future
watcher792 11 months ago
@watcher792 Yeah well it sucks to be Native. Trust me I know. Mi'kmaq.
Eddythebeast666 11 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 no it dont man, be proud of your heritage. expand.
DJonX7 10 months ago
@DJonX7 I didn't say I was ashamed. Just that is sucks, as in we got the crappy end of the stick sucks but thank you for the moral boost. Right back at ya.
Eddythebeast666 10 months ago
@Eddythebeast666 i didn't say you were ashamed ;D is tecumseh your grampa? XDD
DJonX7 10 months ago
@DJonX7 No link that I'm aware of but he is revered. I can trace back to 1680 Mi'kmaq/French Arcadian on my mothers side & British loyalist slave owners in Colonial America late 1700's
Eddythebeast666 10 months ago
I'm glad America and Canada are buds now.
VerendumProductions 11 months ago
i imagine usa would not invade canada in modern times seeing as usa lost wars to poor countries like iraq and vietnam, they have the weapons, but they just dont know how to fight, they are soft i guess.
Love4SK 11 months ago
@Love4SK what the hell are you talking about we didnt lose to Iraq and if you think Americans dont know how to fight we have only ever lost one war and that would be Vietnam and if we had stayed we would have won it was just all the whiners back stateside that stopped us from doing so
watcher792 11 months ago
America soon learned it was easier to take over Canada corporately. Buy out all Canadian businesses
200357846 1 year ago
@200357846 When a corporation owns more assets abroad then in the nation of origin they tend to have more loyalty to the investment then the nation where they came from. Last time I checked corporations from both our nations were getting pretty tight with Mexico & China.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
AND CANADIANS WOUD TOTALY DO IT AGAIN IF AMERICA INVADED NOW! WE SHOULD REALLY JUST INVADE USA NOW AND TAKE IT OVER!!
gododoof 1 year ago
@gododoof ... Umm... America isn't going to invade Canada again.... Yeah, it's a really nice place from, what I've heard.... Why would hate us so much?
soraroxas365 1 year ago
@gododoof haha Well Said!!!! :D:D:D I fully agree eh? :p
shylodragon 1 year ago
@gododoof Okay look dude, learn your shit. First off, America wouldn't invade Canada, we're fucking allied. Secondly, I doubt Canada will invade US because a bunch of police officers with batons isn't exactly an ARMY. But hey, that doesn't mean you can't fly down here and light it on fire. Because I would love to see an internet badass like you try. So please, next time you make a post, Atleast know what your talking about!
Aragni96 11 months ago
@Aragni96 lol buddy, he was makin a joke. up here were pretty chill. but go ahead, make fun of our army, hell, take shots at our police force, jus remember that the reason we dont need an army is cuz we have no need for it. were genuinly happy NOT invadin other contries or startin fights. weve got world class peace keepers and makers. take a page outta ur good natured friends from seattles book an jus laugh. way to go seattle! breakin the steriotype that americans r ignorant an cant take a joke.
iraepu 11 months ago
The War of 1812 was basically Canada’s War of Independence. Between 1812 and 1814, Canada won the right to not be American. The Americans think they won it. They’re right. Not in a military sense of course. On the battlefield, the Americans lost. . But war is after all a political tool, and what counts in the end are the long term results, not individual heroics.The United States lost a war and won a conference.
Flyback50 1 year ago 2
@Flyback50 It was also a military win because the military gaind all military objectives,
viperreturns 1 year ago
Funny thing Canadians seem to forget the burning of Washington was in response of York (Toronto) being burned to the ground in April 1813.
CrocidileGena79 1 year ago
@CrocidileGena79 No we don't
xsqueefluffx 1 year ago
A funny video attracting racists? I would imagine such genious' have never of the practical problems of induction in epistemology and logic. Such a problem leads to conclusions who have more to do with ignorance then science. It's the twenty-first goddam century! I know science books arent popular down in texas, but take your head out of your ass once in a while! Lucky those racist retards live in the US, cause in canada, regardless of its many flaws, you get beat up for speaking like the klan.
qclibre2007 1 year ago
HOLY JEBIZZ we havew ouselves a hard core flame war down here :P
bubibutz 1 year ago
you didn't create his it was created by arrogant worms
samsquatch123 1 year ago
Trust me I do not want to related to natives and the idea being gentically similiar to such a brain dead group of people makes me wish you are right, but you are not
You could have just stated you were unaware of your genetic background and I would accept that, however you make the false claim that racial classifications are no longer used and are outdated despite the fact it is used and supported by some of the most regarded Genetists of our time. Sorry you are nnativeot
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY I know it is still used but not by anyone respected in the True Genetics field. The whole science was thrown out do to the political nightmares it created but some of bastards kept going with it even today using it as a legidmising element for bad policy. There was an excelent artical done on human migration patterns & all the branches of humanity. They pointed out that humanity started in Africa which has more genectic divercity then all the seperate braches combined.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 For you to imply the teachings of Suzuki, Maynard, Savantes, not to mention the deptartment of genetics at Cambridge university, Lewis of CIT who is nobel prize winner are not reputable or respected in the Genetics community shows you have no idea what you are talking about. Pffft David Suzuki and Lewis....what a bunch of idiots and Cambridge University. Who ever heard of cambridge - What kind of shitty academics go there.....almost as bad as Harvard.
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY Bah! God damn it man then don't listen to me look it up your self. Think for your self. Honestly there are idiots pushing intelagent design in school trying to rework creationisum in to legidamcy again. The use of those terms are no longer scientific like "Animal, vegitable, mineral" used to be scientific catagories. We trace genetic families by the orignal migrational routes. The Racial feature catagories are throw backs to when all we had was physical apperance to catigorize by.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 As for the last part - I am not talking about outside physical traits at all and more of polymorpisms. Race is not all about physical traits as you so wrongfully state. Race identifiers utilize multiple scientific disicplines - again we use DNA to determine exact race of a unidentifiable bodies...DNA racial printing is 99.999999% accurate. As for migration you again defeated your own argument and proved me right. All living things orginate from the same bacteria cell and yet
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 and yet we are no where close to be being the same. We have 100,0000 's of species of living creatures on this earth and yet you imply we are the same. You state many idiea regarding racial genetics are not accepted or taught --- this is why we have whole new evolving fields based on that exact same premise such as pharmacologic and pharmacogenomic diciplines to name a few. And this is why these fields have showing astounding results
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 As for creationism....and there are idiots who believe a Canadian invented Insulin, lightbulb among others........ I am not talking about the origin of species as this is a whole new topic. Furthermore evolution only further confirms the racial theory. Furthermore creationism is partly based on how we are all equal or the same not how we are different. Hence the term we are all equal in the eyes of the lord. Evolution handly disproves creationism and the idea we are all the same
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY I'm not sure if we ever claim to have invented artificial insulin but we did create the light bulb. If you look it up the original patent for the light bulb was by two Canadians who then sold it to Edison who changed a few slight things to create the light bulb we know today.
curlerdude 1 year ago
@curlerdude Canadians did not invent the light bulb either Shay or Shaw from GB who is credited with this,.
Not don't get me wrong as I am not saying Canadians don't event good things. My favourite is Bio Steel which is an Amazing Canadian invention. I am just highlighting the popular inventions we claim, but had nothing to do with
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY No canada invented the telephone BITCH
drmexicanmahoney1 1 year ago
@drmexicanmahoney1 Alexander Graham Bell was not Canadian and vacatoned at this vacation home in Baddeck Nova Scotia. Which I add is a beautiful place. Bell was never Canadian and in fact refused Canadian citizenship. The phone was pantetned in the US in Washington DC and the first call took place between Boston and Cambridge.
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 Going baclk further ....all living thingsl started from the same bacteria cell. Does not mean I am the same as a dog or a python. Humans are off different races and the DNA theory confirms this and not discredit this. Hence why we are able to run DNA tests on unidentifiable bodies, especially burnt or liquified and use the DNA to determine the exact race. If there was no such thing as race then how can we run DNA tests to determine race?
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@fads90 Nobody won, it ended in a draw after the treaty of Ghent.
501thewesse 1 year ago
Comment removed
501thewesse 1 year ago
omg, pissed myself LOL, only because they speakth the truth!!
wisers001 1 year ago
LOL I LOVE THESE GUYS!!
Yohtarama 1 year ago
US won because we got New Orleans at the end, the gate to the west. As for the burning of Washington: Congratulations 'you' razed a swamp we were in the middle of renovating. We burnt down Toronto, that's the New York of Canada so HA! our pillaging was better! :P
Besides we kicked 'your' asses at Baltimore and forced 'you' to retreat shortly after the razing of DC.
Still your militia fought bravely and pushed us back to our country eventually so power to ya Canada.
fads90 1 year ago
@fads90 idk what your talkin about, toront was never burned down, where you gettin ur info, wikipedia?
spoonman197 1 year ago
@spoonman197 In 1812 Toronto was called York. The Amercans abandoned the conventions of war looted & burned non military buildings. They used tactics nomally reserved for clearing Native tribes. Burning whole towns like Newark leaving populations homeless with out food in the begining of winter. It would have been more merrciful to have killed the populations directly. The USA made a song about this war in to their anthem so we would have to stand resectfully as they celebrate the butchery.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@fads90 Your nation abandoned the conventions of war looted & burned non military buildings. They used tactics nomally reserved for clearing Native tribes. Burning whole towns like Newark leaving populations homeless with out food in the begining of winter. It would have been more merrciful to have killed the populations directly. You guys made a song about this war in to your anthem so we would have to stand resectfully as you celebrate the butchery.
It is difficult to muster respect for you
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 I don't think war conventions were around back then, so i find it unfair to say that our razing of some towns was a war crime. Besides you people were British back then and god knows the British Empire wasn't short on razing towns in foreign countries even after the war of 1812.
As for our anthem, it was about the defense of Fort McHenry, a fort that is VERY MUCH in United States territory so it's more of a defending homeland song than a YAY we made people Freeze to death song
fads90 1 year ago
@fads90 Your nation has a list of non-antagonistic beautiful songs. From your orignal anthem (If a bit religious for a secular nation) to This land is my land to any number of other songs. I'm sure there was good reasons for picking a war related song but keep in mind it does more then just define the USA as a nation to those who are American, it defines who you are as a people those of us who are not. Fort McHenry was retaliation. Canada has done our share of sins as British & on our own.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@fads90 Governor-General Sir George Prevost of Canada wrote to the Admirals in Bermuda calling for a retaliation for the American sacking of York and requested their permission and support in the form of provision of naval resources. At the time, it was considered against the civilized laws of war to burn a non-military facility and the Americans had not only burned the Parliament but also looted and burned the Governor's mansion, private homes and warehouses.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@fads90 also you may have gotten New Orleans but you also want the border to be on the 59th parallel and instead it ended on the 49th - as you can plainly see there were some wins and loses for both sides and the war ended in a tie
elphabarocks 1 year ago
@elphabarocks
USA Objective: Take Canada #FAIL
British Objective: End threat to Canada #WIN
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 The annexation of Canada was never an objective of the war of 1812 and the reflective in the very few armed men used in few dozen sporadic battles spread over years. - Hardly an invasionary force considering the US had nearly 1/2 million armed personell at their disposal.
You say Canada won, but yet with the Boundary Commision agreed upon by GB and USA, it had established through independant arbitrators such as the King of Netherlands that GB was wrongfully occupying US land
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY Yeah & killing all the Natives was never your plan ether you just wanted to stop them from fighting back. Listen up maggot Briton wanted nothing they were buisy with Napolion. To keep the peace they even ended impressment so you didn't even get that by going to war. That was won with diplomicy. Briton came kicked your asses then went back to clean up Europe. Once Napolion was defeated they didn't care about your trading with France & they had never been encourageing the Natives.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebe. First of all shit for brains I am not American, but an immigrant to Canada who is commenting on the obessive and narcisistic behaviour of born Canadians.. Funny how you mention Native treatment was GB back in the day was chastized for native treatment and recently there has been multiple UN notes condemming Canadian treatment of its native population. Be carefull when you start pointing fingers as you may find a few pointing back
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY I am aware of the issues Native peoples have in Canada thank you. I'm sorry you got lured here... very sorry. As a local Native I'm also sorry we don't meet your high expectations. Looks like you will be using Canada as a gateway to the USA don't let the door hit you on your way. I thought it was spelt Mongolian. What ever.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 Clearly you are not, it's not matter of expectations or anything like that. It is born Canadians are a people not honest with themselves about themselves or the world around them. They run Americans through the ringer for being stupid when born Canadians are less literate and less educated than the typical American. Not to mention how less innovative we are. BTW it is Mongloid, as a mongloid yourself you should have known this......I smell BS
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY Nobody uses that term not since the 70's eugenics pesudo science was discredited. Simalar to "Negro" the word was missaplied as a defining charicterisic of race. So where ever you getting your education from it's 30 years out of date. There has been far to much interbreeding among races to use such terms as there is no such thing as a pure stock Mongloid Negro or Caucasun. Never really has been. You might just as well create a racal class by eye or hair color.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 Mongloid is widely used, especially in the field of genetics....it is not a Eugencis you dumb shit for brains born Canadian . The world is classified into sevarl races of which Mongloids is one. There has been and was inbreeding in thsi world, but at highests estimates at highest times constituted 1-2% of births not enough to nulify the mongloid race as indistinguisable. Furthermore in order for your idea to be valid, it would require incestial inter - racial inbreeding......
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY I'm telling you racal clasifacation is bogus. If races can interbreed then there is only one race. Dogs vary widely in apperance but are known as breeds not seperate races. ANY attemp at legidimising the catagorising physical of charicteristics in to racal profiles was discredited FOR DAMN GOOD REASON after the forced steralazation programs. Genetics science was compleatly reworked to remove all the Eugenics elements. We have since mapped human DNA. What you are talking about outofdate
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 You are stating a personal opinion and nothing more so quit presenting as scientific fact as 1 you are not a genetist and 2 Genetics in terms of race is VERY widely accepted. You are lying your ass off to imply racial genetics is no longer accepted, nor is taught in schools when the most popular and respected genetists support the idea we are of differnet races. You are making the argument that people cannot racial profile as the same race theory is no longer accepted by science
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 racial gentics are routinely taught in the finest education institutes of this world.
As for breed and race.....these are biologically equivelant terms you idiot.
Mitochondrial DNA has confirmed we are almost all identical, but we are more than 50% genetically similiar to fish, over 90% similiar to cats, 60% to fruit flies, 90% similiar to mice. Mitochondrial DNA confirms the race theory and at best notes there are more sub races than previously accepted.
ShayisWY 1 year ago
Now just because we share 90% of the genes with a mouse means in no way we are 90% similiar. As even though we have like genes, there are genomic length, chromosomal division, among hordes of other factors that come into play other than just simply having similiar genes.
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY Divercity is everything. The racial features that everyone has been so hung up on are almost meaningless in genetic science. Natives who crossed the landsbridge only had someting like 40 or 50 genetic fore barers to populate the contenant yet over the thousands of years divercified in well enough to be distinct. There is very little divercity between White Cacasuns & Mongloid while Negro has easily 20X what we have.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 There is also little difference between us and mice, rice, moose, monkeys among others. You completely forget Genomic sequence and chromosonal division plays into our physical and mental differencesquite. Oh yes quit copying and pasting articles that you are taking out of context especially in regards to mitochondrial DNA theory. 4 hours ago you had no idea what the word Mongloid meant and indirectrly asked me. Now you are portraying yourself as an expert.
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY Furthermore as discover and research more polymorphisms we discover there are key differences between races. This has also been used to develop pharmacologic and pharmacogenomic medicines that treat specifically on race. It has been provem over and over and over again pharmacologic and pharmacogenomic medicine are highly effective in treatment. Again there was no differences in races - how is this possible?
ShayisWY 1 year ago
...... as for the this last part think about how it contradicst each other, hence you defeated your own arguement. Mongloid is a term discredited and no longer used? really so this is why some of the most popular people in this field from Suzuki, Maynard, Savante right through to Grey's Antonomy routinely use the term and idea.? You are grabbing at straws
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY Culture is the defining standard now there is no pretease of science to clasifaction terms. You could be as dark as coal but if you put on a suit & play the market you are White Bread. Does not matter how pale you are if you listen to rap you will be seen as a Wigger. It's still bigotry every bit as bad as racisum but at least the lie that its based upon science has been discredited.
Eddythebeast666 1 year ago
@Eddythebeast666 Cutlure and race are two seperate terms and multiple cultures exist in single race. England has many different cultures within its small land. If I am Gaelic does not mean I am of a different race than someone who is Welsh. There are different races in the world, we are not one race of people as confirmed by the most reputable gentists of our time.
ShayisWY 1 year ago
Comment removed
ShayisWY 1 year ago
...GB conceded and gave land to the US. Really 1812 is a war that is regarded as the war both sides won given the concessions given by both. For you to imply Canada won outright is plain ignorance.....actually Canada could never win as no such country existed back then
ShayisWY 1 year ago
@ShayisWY lol there was no winner..it was a tie..but if you really wanted a winner, it would be the "Canadians" aka (arguably) the metis , French, Natives and Brits just because they achieved their goal to defend their homeland but there was no territorial difference so everyone is calling it a tie, these guys were the ones who decided to give Canadians a more nationalist pride..and that's great, it braught Canadians closer to their homeland (:
Rey123Duncan 1 year ago
@Rey123Duncan Both sides won as concessions were achieved from both . As for no territory, again through the boundary commision and through the king of Netherlands it was established that the GB were wrongully occupying US land. GB conceeded and gave up land.
As for Canadian pride, indeed as there are things we should be proud of 1812 considering some great battle victories and concessions. However some of our pride is based on misconceptions...... The same also be said of the US as well
ShayisWY