i love how you put stuff in your videos like come see my show, but just not creepy people, cus I don't want you to kill me. I would laugh if you said "if you try to kill me I will kill you back". Then they wouldn't know what do to.
hahahaha!! Just the first 20 seconds alone is hilereous! You made my night <3 3D movies are bad for the development of the corneas, which is developing till the child is 13 years old. The sad thing IS, however, the majority of the cool movies out (shrek, Up.. etc) are all in 3D. Those children will have horrible eye problems when they are older.
But, I guess it's alright for the older crowd. EXCEPT for the Saw movies!! They are already super realistic... ICKKK!
I can't see the 3D effect very well. I see some of it, but not a lot. Or maybe that's what everyone sees and I just expect it to be more? I don't know. But yeah, stuff shot in 3D is way better than, say, Alice in Wonderland, which was shot in 2D and 'converted' to 3D. But 3D is a fad that I doubt will last very much longer. As for topics, how about... delicious brownies? No, I don't have any good ideas for topics, why do you ask?
But I agree, native 3D movies work so much better than those modified to be 3D. What is most important in my mind, though, when it comes to 3D is that the movie does not over focus on the 3D and ignore more important aspects, like acting ability and story. Basically, if the movie focuses on using 3D like the Star Wars prequels used CGI, we have a problem. Avatar is so amazing in 3D BECAUSE its use is subtle and simply an aspect of the experience.
i agree like all films are in 3D now, and it costs more.
xD x
RaWrYoChEeZe 1 year ago
i love how you put stuff in your videos like come see my show, but just not creepy people, cus I don't want you to kill me. I would laugh if you said "if you try to kill me I will kill you back". Then they wouldn't know what do to.
krunk1586 1 year ago
silly rambler come up with a outline of what you wanna get across but youre still awesome
matoxewu 1 year ago
Aaaaaw no creepy people *Insert sad face here*
NecroKatanaScythe 1 year ago
hahahaha!! Just the first 20 seconds alone is hilereous! You made my night <3 3D movies are bad for the development of the corneas, which is developing till the child is 13 years old. The sad thing IS, however, the majority of the cool movies out (shrek, Up.. etc) are all in 3D. Those children will have horrible eye problems when they are older.
But, I guess it's alright for the older crowd. EXCEPT for the Saw movies!! They are already super realistic... ICKKK!
TheIhatecreatinguser 1 year ago
I can't see the 3D effect very well. I see some of it, but not a lot. Or maybe that's what everyone sees and I just expect it to be more? I don't know. But yeah, stuff shot in 3D is way better than, say, Alice in Wonderland, which was shot in 2D and 'converted' to 3D. But 3D is a fad that I doubt will last very much longer. As for topics, how about... delicious brownies? No, I don't have any good ideas for topics, why do you ask?
astrosteve 1 year ago
The Shawshank Redemption in 3D!
adriennechrislady 1 year ago
Awwwww, you're so mean to Seth Rogan, lol
But I agree, native 3D movies work so much better than those modified to be 3D. What is most important in my mind, though, when it comes to 3D is that the movie does not over focus on the 3D and ignore more important aspects, like acting ability and story. Basically, if the movie focuses on using 3D like the Star Wars prequels used CGI, we have a problem. Avatar is so amazing in 3D BECAUSE its use is subtle and simply an aspect of the experience.
warboss5 1 year ago