If it was fake, perhaps there would had been over hundreds of people working on to fake the 6 landings plus Apollo 8, 10 and 13 over in a period of almost 4 years. Could so many people hold on to a secret for over 40 years? No.
Someone would have come forth and said that he/she have anticipated on faking the moonlandings. Being perhaps rich and famous.
gobsmaked...er...I mean 'hunckbacked' seems to have taken the cowards way out. But then, it IS the coward who uses lies and deception to trick other people.
You MHBs are SO damaged, I REALLY feel sorry for you. EVERY bit of documentation from the MOST documented event of all time, has stood up to scrutiny for over 40 years. If YOU think you know better, then you REALLY need to sit back and re-examine your purpose.
to photograph the Moon with ordinary film you'll need 5 minutes exposure. To photograph the stars you need very sensitive film and something bright in an ordinary way, in the picture will ruin your chances of getting the stars too. Hence no stars in the photographs.
Bottom line ... if we went to the Moon we could do it again. Maybe this time they'll bother to take pictures of the stars.
Basic human nature dictates that the moon landings were faked. Anyone would look at the stars. They didn't? They would be proud of the accomplishment, instead of being shame-faced, as Aldrin, Armstrong, and most of the others were.
NASA would address the questions for real, instead of letting that whey-faced retard Brian Welch sneer that all doubters are crazy.
'Basic human nature dictates that the moon landings were faked. Anyone would look at the stars. They didn't?'
No. Only a small minority of ignorants such as you have that quirk of 'unhuman' nature. Everything in this film has been debunked MANY times over by REAL subject matter experts. The astronauts had several DAYS of space travel to look at any stars. They went to the Moon to study the MOON, Einstein! The bright lunar surface made star-gazing difficult, anyway.
The moonlanding was fake... You know how i know that?
Because it's impossible to get there... Even nowadays it's not possible. There is band of radiation surrounding the Earth. Called the Van allen belt. There still is no material invented that blocks radiation. The belt is 25.000 kilometer wide... All that time intense radiation means your death. but in 1969 they didnt know the belt existed. So they thought they COULD fly to the moon, while they never could.
'There still is no material invented that blocks radiation. '
You ARE an ignorant one, aren't you! There are MANY materials that block, or more correctly, 'shield' against radiation - lead, poly, paper, aluminum, etc. - all depending on the type and intensity of the radiation. The VABs were comfirmed to exist in 1958, which even YOU may be able to recognize was well before 1969. They skirted the edges (the least intense area) of the VABs and minimized their time in them.
Offcourse i ment the large amount off radiation of the van Allen belt.
I only have 500 characters to write in a comment so i hoped it wasnt necessary to say..
But offcourse, if you have 6 foot thick lead spacesuit... You can fly thru the van Allen belt. By calling me ignorant for such a small detail, really speak to your character.
'You can fly thru the van Allen belt. By calling me ignorant for such a small detail, really speak to your character.'
No, I call you ignorant, because your posts absolutely REEK of it. Where did you get your '6 foot thick lead' requirement? And can YOU tell me what Apollo's actual trajectory thru the VABs was? What is the attenuation factor for the Apollo spacecraft's shielding? These are direct questions that will show the ignorance of your previous posts.
Furthermore, please expound on your IGNORANT comment that there are no laser reflectors on the Moon. Tell me how our lasers are capable of calculating the distance to the Moon within a few centimeters without knowing the EXACT location of the reflective source?
If the laser beam reflects on a natural spot of the moon (a natural slica plate), the distance to the moon can also be calculated within few centimeters.
'If the laser beam reflects on a natural spot of the moon (a natural slica plate), the distance to the moon can also be calculated within few centimeters'
And exactly HOW could this be done? If you haven't BEEN there to know the EXACT location of said reflection? And HOW do you differentiate one natural silica plate reflection from another? What math/optics have you used to determine that silica plate will actually reflect enough of the pulsed light to be detected?
I could go on and on pointing out your ignorance of the actual science and physical facts of Apollo, but I will also say that EVERYONE is ignorant of MANY things, of course, me included. However, I am fairly well versed on the Apollo missions and their associated sciences. For you to pontificate about such subjects when your 'ideas' are so easily debunked shows you are either being deliberately misleading, or are indeed ignorant of the basics. I suggest better research on your part
The fact NASA is not responding publicly,legally,or in any other way to all the documentaries on which every researcher concluded the landing was a hoax ,it's as good as confession.
'The fact NASA is not responding...it's as good as confession.'
This is why no one asks YOU for legal advice. You 'documentaries' and 'researchers' are nothing but misrepresentations, bad science, out-of-context quotes or ideas, ignorance, conjecture, or outright lies. Give me ANY bit of evidence, ONE at a time, and I WILL prove the falsehood or irrationality of ANY of it. Remember, conjecture, as you childishly stated above, is NOT evidence.
'OK! Bring it on...I'll personally make sure you going to jail with Aldrin and the other scum since you love them so much.'
Pardon me while I recover from the shock and awe you have instilled in me (sarcasm detector in full alarm). Let's start with your point no. 1, shall we? YOU claim their non-response is proof of guilt. Please enlighten the world as to what court(s) agree with THAT. REAL justice demands evidence, not inane babbling.
Also, please note that your post that started your latest tantrum (claiming silence = guilt) IS conjecture, and conjecture, by nature, is worthless, so I, and every RATIONAL person, can dismiss it out of hand as tangible evidence.
Now, think about this: You have, as an engineer, participated to the most fantastic adventure ever.
Some doubters present arguments which cast doubt on this adventure.
Wouldn't you want, as an engineer, to respond to these arguments and present counter-arguments which destroy these arguments and explain the incoherences which are put forward by the doubters, so that the doubts stop?
'Wouldn't you want, as an engineer, to respond to these arguments and present counter-arguments which destroy these arguments'
Of course, however, when the arguments are presented by irrational, scientifically ignorant, or purposely deceptive people, you would be wasting your time. ALL presented arguments HAVE been thoroughly debunked (conjecture excepted, as it is mere fantasy, with no tangible evidence) to the satisfaction of the WORLD's respective accredited scientists.
Well then, I am not an space engineer, hmmmm......I might be wrong about the whole thing, maybe you are a tricker.
A lot of engineers claim the Government conspericy theory about the 9/11 is correct ? how can such so-called deep knowledgeable academic be so dumb - stupid to claim such obviously idiotic.
The 9/11 conspiracy is also a subject on which I have no definitive opinion.
But there is at least one thing I am practically sure of: I don't buy the fact that the CIA was not knowing the terrorists were dangerous just because they had renewed their passports before coming to the states.
They are really taking us for imbeciles when they say that.
If you really think that, because you have a new passport, the American authorities don't check your past to know if you didn't have another one before, and where you travelled with, then you are really naive and gullible.
'Only those who have a deep knowledge of space engineering, computers and electronics can see that Apollo is bullshit.'
???? For all your bluster, you have certainly gone suspiciously silent. What are you afraid of? Where is YOUR 'deep knowledge' evidence that says Apollo was not as advertised?
Rational, educated people DO know that we walked on the Moon, and that all the evidence is legit. YOU are but a rock sinking below an ocean of knowledge.
'OK! Bring it on if you dare...I'll personally make sure you going to jail with Aldrin and the other scum'
Allright, I brought it on and YOU disappeared. I flagged down a cop outside and he says, you have yet to lodge any formal complaint,. He also said I can't be arrested just because I irritate an idiot.
JFK was probably the last real president of the US.. He acknowledged the existence of a powerful cabal of people bent on controlling everything and everyone on the planet.
I bet his declaration on landing a man on the moon before the end of the 60s was more of a ploy to force "them" to reveal their positions.. since he knew that the feat was impossible.
Too bad, "they" were too desperate to the point of faking the thing just to fulfill that JFK "promise"..
Lol...this old guy has never heard of the saying "no one can hear you scream in space"?
He's complaining you shouldn't be able to hear the astronauts over the sound of the rocket, but there is no atmosphere for the engine sound to travel in! deep. We can only hear the astronauts because they have microphones inside there pressurised helmets XD
lmao, you could go the moon if you put a 4foot thick lead shield on the rocket so it could survive getting through the earths atmosphere, and then you be 50degrees above the boiling of water if you were stood on the moon, the landings are fake just like nasa and the fake heros who are said to have stood on it.
They've proved it's real. When the astronauts landed they planted the American flag AND a reflector like you might find on a bicycle. If you point a giant laser and moniter it's light level at that spot, you get 10000% more light reflected than anywhere else on the moon. Get over it, they landed.
You can bounce of a laser anywhere on the moon. In WW2 they used a technique called moonbouncing. If you directed your radiowaves to the moon, it'd bounce of, and you could talk around the curve of the planet. There is no reflector there... The moon just reflects light... Its the whole reason why it appears to be lit at night. Also aiming a lazer over 240.000 miles on 5 by 5 foot square? That's the best sniper in the universe then. impossible
'There is no reflector there... The moon just reflects light... Its the whole reason why it appears to be lit at night.'
Another outright lie, or comletete ignorance, as far as your 'no reflector' error goes. Of couse you can reflect a laser off the Moon itself, but you have no idea which photo was reflected from where, so you cannot gleam any information about the Moon's distance to the tolerances you can from a KNOWN reflector's location (i.e., within CENTIMETERS),
Only an uneducated fool would believe this crap.
tek1001 1 week ago
FOX investigating ...OK
LOL
glower125 1 week ago
If it was fake, perhaps there would had been over hundreds of people working on to fake the 6 landings plus Apollo 8, 10 and 13 over in a period of almost 4 years. Could so many people hold on to a secret for over 40 years? No.
Someone would have come forth and said that he/she have anticipated on faking the moonlandings. Being perhaps rich and famous.
karlzzzen86 2 months ago
@karlzzzen86 stfu go and lick illuminatis ass
kacha90 2 months ago
@kacha90 Haha, wtf?! I feel sorry for you...
karlzzzen86 2 months ago
@karlzzzen86 are you stupid and do you think they want to be kill.
samiee99ftw 1 month ago
*chirp*
*chirp*
gobsmaked...er...I mean 'hunckbacked' seems to have taken the cowards way out. But then, it IS the coward who uses lies and deception to trick other people.
You MHBs are SO damaged, I REALLY feel sorry for you. EVERY bit of documentation from the MOST documented event of all time, has stood up to scrutiny for over 40 years. If YOU think you know better, then you REALLY need to sit back and re-examine your purpose.
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
to photograph the Moon with ordinary film you'll need 5 minutes exposure. To photograph the stars you need very sensitive film and something bright in an ordinary way, in the picture will ruin your chances of getting the stars too. Hence no stars in the photographs.
Confuddler 5 months ago
Bottom line ... if we went to the Moon we could do it again. Maybe this time they'll bother to take pictures of the stars.
Basic human nature dictates that the moon landings were faked. Anyone would look at the stars. They didn't? They would be proud of the accomplishment, instead of being shame-faced, as Aldrin, Armstrong, and most of the others were.
NASA would address the questions for real, instead of letting that whey-faced retard Brian Welch sneer that all doubters are crazy.
gkparks1 5 months ago 2
@gkparks1
'Basic human nature dictates that the moon landings were faked. Anyone would look at the stars. They didn't?'
No. Only a small minority of ignorants such as you have that quirk of 'unhuman' nature. Everything in this film has been debunked MANY times over by REAL subject matter experts. The astronauts had several DAYS of space travel to look at any stars. They went to the Moon to study the MOON, Einstein! The bright lunar surface made star-gazing difficult, anyway.
Monkeyboysdontknow 5 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
The moonlanding was fake... You know how i know that?
Because it's impossible to get there... Even nowadays it's not possible. There is band of radiation surrounding the Earth. Called the Van allen belt. There still is no material invented that blocks radiation. The belt is 25.000 kilometer wide... All that time intense radiation means your death. but in 1969 they didnt know the belt existed. So they thought they COULD fly to the moon, while they never could.
Loupland 4 months ago
@Loupland
'There still is no material invented that blocks radiation. '
You ARE an ignorant one, aren't you! There are MANY materials that block, or more correctly, 'shield' against radiation - lead, poly, paper, aluminum, etc. - all depending on the type and intensity of the radiation. The VABs were comfirmed to exist in 1958, which even YOU may be able to recognize was well before 1969. They skirted the edges (the least intense area) of the VABs and minimized their time in them.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
Offcourse i ment the large amount off radiation of the van Allen belt.
I only have 500 characters to write in a comment so i hoped it wasnt necessary to say..
But offcourse, if you have 6 foot thick lead spacesuit... You can fly thru the van Allen belt. By calling me ignorant for such a small detail, really speak to your character.
Loupland 4 months ago
@Loupland
'You can fly thru the van Allen belt. By calling me ignorant for such a small detail, really speak to your character.'
No, I call you ignorant, because your posts absolutely REEK of it. Where did you get your '6 foot thick lead' requirement? And can YOU tell me what Apollo's actual trajectory thru the VABs was? What is the attenuation factor for the Apollo spacecraft's shielding? These are direct questions that will show the ignorance of your previous posts.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Loupland
Furthermore, please expound on your IGNORANT comment that there are no laser reflectors on the Moon. Tell me how our lasers are capable of calculating the distance to the Moon within a few centimeters without knowing the EXACT location of the reflective source?
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
If the laser beam reflects on a natural spot of the moon (a natural slica plate), the distance to the moon can also be calculated within few centimeters.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hunchbacked
'If the laser beam reflects on a natural spot of the moon (a natural slica plate), the distance to the moon can also be calculated within few centimeters'
And exactly HOW could this be done? If you haven't BEEN there to know the EXACT location of said reflection? And HOW do you differentiate one natural silica plate reflection from another? What math/optics have you used to determine that silica plate will actually reflect enough of the pulsed light to be detected?
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
@Loupland
I could go on and on pointing out your ignorance of the actual science and physical facts of Apollo, but I will also say that EVERYONE is ignorant of MANY things, of course, me included. However, I am fairly well versed on the Apollo missions and their associated sciences. For you to pontificate about such subjects when your 'ideas' are so easily debunked shows you are either being deliberately misleading, or are indeed ignorant of the basics. I suggest better research on your part
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Loupland But they did know about the belt.
Lachausis 3 months ago
@gkparks1
The fact NASA is not responding publicly,legally,or in any other way to all the documentaries on which every researcher concluded the landing was a hoax ,it's as good as confession.
ApolloWasRealHoax 4 months ago
@ApolloWasRealHoax
'The fact NASA is not responding...it's as good as confession.'
This is why no one asks YOU for legal advice. You 'documentaries' and 'researchers' are nothing but misrepresentations, bad science, out-of-context quotes or ideas, ignorance, conjecture, or outright lies. Give me ANY bit of evidence, ONE at a time, and I WILL prove the falsehood or irrationality of ANY of it. Remember, conjecture, as you childishly stated above, is NOT evidence.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
OK! Bring it on if you dare fucking prognathous dickhead .
Justice is obligated to give a yes or no answer. What is more easy ,or simple, than that?
I'll personally make sure you going to jail with Aldrin and the other scum since you love them so much.
ApolloWasRealHoax 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ApolloWasRealHoax
'OK! Bring it on...I'll personally make sure you going to jail with Aldrin and the other scum since you love them so much.'
Pardon me while I recover from the shock and awe you have instilled in me (sarcasm detector in full alarm). Let's start with your point no. 1, shall we? YOU claim their non-response is proof of guilt. Please enlighten the world as to what court(s) agree with THAT. REAL justice demands evidence, not inane babbling.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@ApolloWasRealHoax
Also, please note that your post that started your latest tantrum (claiming silence = guilt) IS conjecture, and conjecture, by nature, is worthless, so I, and every RATIONAL person, can dismiss it out of hand as tangible evidence.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
Now, think about this: You have, as an engineer, participated to the most fantastic adventure ever.
Some doubters present arguments which cast doubt on this adventure.
Wouldn't you want, as an engineer, to respond to these arguments and present counter-arguments which destroy these arguments and explain the incoherences which are put forward by the doubters, so that the doubts stop?
I WOULD, AND THIS IS NOT A CONJECTURE!
hunchbacked 2 months ago
@hunchbacked
'Wouldn't you want, as an engineer, to respond to these arguments and present counter-arguments which destroy these arguments'
Of course, however, when the arguments are presented by irrational, scientifically ignorant, or purposely deceptive people, you would be wasting your time. ALL presented arguments HAVE been thoroughly debunked (conjecture excepted, as it is mere fantasy, with no tangible evidence) to the satisfaction of the WORLD's respective accredited scientists.
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
No, it's not true, counter-arguments are often flawed and not very convincing, apart for those who emit them and those who want to believe in them.
And many arguments of the moon hoaxers have never been debunked.
Among all the arguments I have presented, less than a quarter of them have been attempted to be countered.
The other ones have never received the least debunk.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
@hunchbacked
Monkeyboy.......one of his many accounts, he says he gets his paycheck from ESA, do you think that that has an impulse on why he is a Moon lander ?
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen
Only those who have a deep knowledge of space engineering, computers and electronics can see that Apollo is bullshit.
If I was ignorant, I would probably be an Apollo believer.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
@hunchbacked
Well then, I am not an space engineer, hmmmm......I might be wrong about the whole thing, maybe you are a tricker.
A lot of engineers claim the Government conspericy theory about the 9/11 is correct ? how can such so-called deep knowledgeable academic be so dumb - stupid to claim such obviously idiotic.
kennjohnsen 2 months ago
@kennjohnsen
The 9/11 conspiracy is also a subject on which I have no definitive opinion.
But there is at least one thing I am practically sure of: I don't buy the fact that the CIA was not knowing the terrorists were dangerous just because they had renewed their passports before coming to the states.
They are really taking us for imbeciles when they say that.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
@hunchbacked
'They are really taking us for imbeciles when they say that.'
Nope. It's statements like you just made that supports any 'imbecile' label.
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
If you really think that, because you have a new passport, the American authorities don't check your past to know if you didn't have another one before, and where you travelled with, then you are really naive and gullible.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
@hunchbacked
'Only those who have a deep knowledge of space engineering, computers and electronics can see that Apollo is bullshit.'
Hahahaha. You mean YOU??? Hahahahahah. You COULD be a comdian, you know.
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow
A "comedian" who knows far more about these sciences than you.
hunchbacked 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hunchbacked
'A "comedian" who knows far more about these sciences than you.'
Brilliant! You obviously don't know how to accept a simple challange, Einstein!
So...real..slow...what...is...YOUR...best...evidence...for...a...Moon...hoax?
*Hint* There isn't ANY!
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hunchbacked
'Only those who have a deep knowledge of space engineering, computers and electronics can see that Apollo is bullshit.'
???? For all your bluster, you have certainly gone suspiciously silent. What are you afraid of? Where is YOUR 'deep knowledge' evidence that says Apollo was not as advertised?
Rational, educated people DO know that we walked on the Moon, and that all the evidence is legit. YOU are but a rock sinking below an ocean of knowledge.
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
@hunchbacked
'No, it's not true, counter-arguments are often flawed and not very convincing, apart for those who emit them and those who want to believe in them.'
I thoroughly disagree, hence the word 'rational'. Example: What is YOUR best argument? I do NOT expect any 'rational' evidence...
Monkeyboysdontknow 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ApolloWasRealHoax
'OK! Bring it on if you dare...I'll personally make sure you going to jail with Aldrin and the other scum'
Allright, I brought it on and YOU disappeared. I flagged down a cop outside and he says, you have yet to lodge any formal complaint,. He also said I can't be arrested just because I irritate an idiot.
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JFK was probably the last real president of the US.. He acknowledged the existence of a powerful cabal of people bent on controlling everything and everyone on the planet.
I bet his declaration on landing a man on the moon before the end of the 60s was more of a ploy to force "them" to reveal their positions.. since he knew that the feat was impossible.
Too bad, "they" were too desperate to the point of faking the thing just to fulfill that JFK "promise"..
Plus, they killed him for his guts.
myquill23 6 months ago
Lol...this old guy has never heard of the saying "no one can hear you scream in space"?
He's complaining you shouldn't be able to hear the astronauts over the sound of the rocket, but there is no atmosphere for the engine sound to travel in! deep. We can only hear the astronauts because they have microphones inside there pressurised helmets XD
macz202 6 months ago
lmao, you could go the moon if you put a 4foot thick lead shield on the rocket so it could survive getting through the earths atmosphere, and then you be 50degrees above the boiling of water if you were stood on the moon, the landings are fake just like nasa and the fake heros who are said to have stood on it.
irishgeal1 7 months ago
They've proved it's real. When the astronauts landed they planted the American flag AND a reflector like you might find on a bicycle. If you point a giant laser and moniter it's light level at that spot, you get 10000% more light reflected than anywhere else on the moon. Get over it, they landed.
mrgrayfish115 7 months ago
@mrgrayfish115 That could have been put there by our unmanned probes.
gkparks1 5 months ago
@mrgrayfish115
Did you know the moon is a reflector.
You can bounce of a laser anywhere on the moon. In WW2 they used a technique called moonbouncing. If you directed your radiowaves to the moon, it'd bounce of, and you could talk around the curve of the planet. There is no reflector there... The moon just reflects light... Its the whole reason why it appears to be lit at night. Also aiming a lazer over 240.000 miles on 5 by 5 foot square? That's the best sniper in the universe then. impossible
Loupland 4 months ago
@Loupland
'There is no reflector there... The moon just reflects light... Its the whole reason why it appears to be lit at night.'
Another outright lie, or comletete ignorance, as far as your 'no reflector' error goes. Of couse you can reflect a laser off the Moon itself, but you have no idea which photo was reflected from where, so you cannot gleam any information about the Moon's distance to the tolerances you can from a KNOWN reflector's location (i.e., within CENTIMETERS),
Monkeyboysdontknow 4 months ago
670Kiester
Move on and do not investigate or question anything?
Sounds like someone has something to hide. Hmmm.....
Camel76 7 months ago 2
jeez...you really shouldn't bother with this total childish retarded dumbness.
clavius.org
read it. realise the conspiracy people are lying at the very least about a whole bunch of obvious things. move on with your life.
670Kiester 8 months ago