Anybody who believes this shit is a fucking moron. I said it. I don't fucking care. You creationists are more than willing to live in a world dominated by science. You fly in jets, use the internet, and partake in the 'miracles' of modern medicine, yet none of you can logically think for yourselves. Superstition and bronze age myths are more important and hold more weight?
You sound angry. Are you mad because you know that hes right and your wrong? You wouldnt last in no real creation vs evolution debate because of all your cursing and beligirant behavior. They would throw you out the debate room. And usuall when people dont have an argument they do exactly what you just did. Whine, cry and act like a baby
@SapphireDiamond19 Ha! Another turd. You have nothing. You believe this shit yet you have never read or studied the evidence he is distorting/making-up. Where did he get his information? What books (Hint: Creationists wrote them) and studies is he quoting ? In what context were these errors given? Does he/you know that there are many forms of dating methods? Do you even understand how science works? How studies are conducted and published?
@SapphireDiamond19 Not everything is going to be 100% in science, we are only human, mistakes do happen. But you bible thumping christians are too ignorant to even try to comprehend this stuff. Need a quick and easy answer. Something that makes you feel good. Don't believe me? Here, I will prove it. How do you know earth was created 6k years ago? Oh, that's right, a book.
@SapphireDiamond19 Who was I debating? No one, at the time. Crucial info was missing. But I will indulge you. Go to 3:24. The third paragraph is talking about snails and false dating on the shells. This is called the "reservoir effect." Scientitst know about it and I learned about it in 9th grade. They test for it and take it into account. This effect is also applicable to other "studies" he mentioned.
Anyways, I actually left a comment. Learn the difference.
@kb24crazylaker Here's part of my comment to SapphireDiamond19... 2 or 3 comments down from yours!
"Go to 3:24. The third paragraph is talking about snails and false dating on the shells. This is called the "reservoir effect." Scientitst know about it and I learned about it in 9th grade. They test for it and take it into account. This effect is also applicable to other "studies" he mentioned."
You want me to debunk all of them on Youtube? You're a fool. Go read a book other than the bible.
@mukkohaha My logic? You quote mined me. You did exactly what a little creationist would do. You took my whole comment out of context and used it to make your feeble mind feel better. Thanks for proving just how dishonest creationists are.
@JeanetteTherese " a little creationist " why do you talk like that ? do i call you " a tiny little dishonest evolutionist "
Do i generalize and think of you as a group of people ? No, i'm not a blockhead like yourself. I'm talking to you specifically, no person who believed in evolution would even want to be put in group with you, so i will not generalize for their sake.
@JeanetteTherese " Anybody who believes this shit is a fucking moron. I said it. I don't fucking care. You creationists are more than willing to live in a world dominated by science. You fly in jets, use the internet, and partake in the 'miracles' of modern medicine, yet none of you can logically think for yourselves. Superstition and bronze age myths are more important and hold more weight?
Fucking turds "
Just so you won't mistake me for taking something out of context
@JeanetteTherese Creationist are more then willing to live in a world dominated by science ?
Science and Religion are not opposites first of all. Medicine, The internet and Jets are not the Opposite of Religion, Science doesn't have the answers for existentialism, " 2nd law of thermodynamics: Energy cannot be created or destroyed "
When or How did energy come ?, What fueled the big bang ? How did Non living matter turn into living matter ?
@JeanetteTherese To this day in State of the Art labs with hundreds of years of research and the most intelligent minds in the world simply cannot turn non-living matter into living matter, It's incomprehensible and impossible. Yet the assumption of Darwinian origin of species holds the belief that non living matter turned into living matter in the soup that covered the earth in early earth stages by sheer random chance, which is only an unscientific belief.
@JeanetteTherese they don't know how the First life got created. don't know where energy came from, Or even if it ever came, or if it always were their. But if Energy always were their we embark on an infinite timeline, then this moment would simply never occur since their would be an previous event, and a previous event before that to infinity.
At some point energy did have to come, what fueled the big bang ? and at some point living matter came from non-living matter.
@JeanetteTherese you don't know shit about science or existentialism, All you can do is repeat what you were told in school and not think for yourself, yet you seem to proud of your "acquired" knowledge and curse at anyone who doesn't believe in your own unscientific belief.
Remember why it's called Big bang (Theory) and Evolution ( theory ) because it's a fucking theory. Now go read up some more on your theory that has nothing to do with science.
@mukkohaha Not understanding thermodynamics? Not understanding what a scientific theory is? Saying that evolution and the big bang have nothing to do with science? Mixing up evolution and abiogenesis? bringing up existentialism? quote mining, again? Thanks!! You proved (again) everything I already said about you!
It's sad. I can't believe the amount of mental gymnastics you put yourself through. All because you are afraid to question your beliefs. Keep reading the good book... blockhead.
@JeanetteTherese Ok now tell me, where did energy come from ? without breaking the laws of Thermodynamics. If you tell me " Energy has always been here " Then you believe in an infinite time line, then you don't understand the concept of time.
@JeanetteTherese " Mixing up evolution and abiogenesis? " No i don't mix them up, it's just your unintelligent brain that overflows. You don't like to be quoted i see, that naturally comes with talking a lot of nonsensical bullshit i guess.
With no Abiogenesis their would be no Evolution. With no Big bang their would be no Evolution or No Abiogenesis, Even a deluded retard like yourself should be able to understand this.
@mukkohaha You do realize that none of these theories need the other to survive? Right? I guess you really don't. If you did, you wouldn't make such retarded comments.
I have a truly hard time understanding why you fear these theories so much? They don't try to disprove god. They try to understand the world around us. This scares you doesn't it? Maybe you should look deep in yourself and figure out why.
@JeanetteTherese What you just said took the Cake for most retarded statement i have ever heard.
WITHOUT Big bang, The entire Universe would not be here right now, according to Science. You do understand that Abiogenesis was the event that happened in the Prehistoric soup that turned Non-living matter into Living matter, Without Living matter NO Evolution.
Jeanette don't reply back, your a retarded lost cause.
@mukkohaha How does disproving the big bang disprove evolution? If the big bang turns out to be wrong, then all that means is we still don't know what brought the universe into existence.
What is your answer to these questions that people much smarter than you are working on? Seriously! I have yet to hear anything to disprove evolution, the big bang, or abiogenesis from any of your ramblings.
Again, why are you so afraid of these theories? What do they take away from you?
And your right on that logic, I just misunderstood it, My logic just said:
At one point Everything had to come, So big bang or Any theory like it, is required for the Start, And Abiogenesis Requires a " Start " such as the big bang theory
But if Big bang never happened their is unforeseen factors that play in, that may invalidate Abiogenesis do you understand my thought pattern here ?
@mukkohaha So you call me a retard yet it is you that cannot understand shit? And on top of that you cannot even make your point? Yeah I understand your thought pattern. Unfortunately, you couldn't explain it well enough in the first place and you acted like all the other commenters and attacked me like a child. Fuck you
@JeanetteTherese Don't be like the Flat earth folks who thought they knew everything with their " Right now their isn't any more to know, all we know now has every last factor counted in "
This way of thinking is Arrogant and retarded.
I for one believe that in 200 years Their will be many countless of things we believe right now that will be laughed at and thought as primitive science and ignorant based knowledge.
@mukkohaha Where did I say anything along the lines of "right now their isn't any more to know..."? You are the one that is proposing that. You are the one that is disagreeing with science because it goes against your belief system. Of course science will change in 200 years. Science is actually looking to explain. Your bible hasn't changed in 2000.
Flat earth? I think you are speaking about yourself and your fellow creationists.
@JeanetteTherese Afraid ? I'm not afraid of these theories, i'm just amazed at how ignorant people are " people much smarter " These people are Blinded from the truth. Right from the Start they say that " Intelligent design " is not an option, so they will always look away from that possibility.
Even tho every last shred of Nature and Science screams towards intelligent design. And they will make a Huge pile of shit Theories to get around it.
@JeanetteTherese Now tell me, How did The first life forms emerge ? How did non-living matter Turn itself into living matter in nature (: ? by sheer random chance ?
A feat which to this day in State of the art labs with hundreds years research have been proved impossible. Even Directed Guided attempts at creating living matter out of non living matter is 100 % impossible, and you want to believe this stuff happens in Nature unguided ? in a land far away a long Long time ago ?
@JeanetteTherese It's one big Theory with no proof at any level.
Big bang - the formation of planets - abiogenesis - evolution <- That's one big theory, Take out the big bang for instance, and the rest would not happen, Take out abiogenesis and evolution would not have happened.
This is One huge Shit sandwich of Unproved theories from start to Finnish. But no you little gullible retard, leave me alone and go back to dream world.
This man is a total Idiot if the thinks that rock from mount St. Helen was created on the day of the eruption. The radio active materials were not created on that day. He can talk fast and scream, but that will not cover up that is is an idiot.
@gregrutz No u can't prove evolution or creation to be true, but there's overwhelming evidence this Earth was created about 6000 years ago with a global flood 4400 years ago and the death of Jesus on the cross for our sins with a ressurection 3 days later about 2000 years ago.
@purpleleach1 You think billy bible is evidence. Check with a Geologists, there is no evidence for a global flood and the earth is old. Go look, and don't pay any attention to those fossils.
@gregrutz How about they prove it ? Every single time one of those so called experts are asked the tough questions like if a global flood can effect dating methods they always side step the question. Honest wtf is up with them do they honestly think that people are going to overlook these questions just cuz they have a pretty pocket protector? Just cuz they claim to be scientist doesn't make whatever BS they come up with auto-right . Somehow countless people buy the lie without askin questions
@DarkBioCloud If you ask ''if a global flood can effect it'' they side step because you are talking about religion, not science. Geologist proved there was no global flood many years ago. Study science and you can add to the knowledge, calling it a lie won't get you far.
@gregrutz Regardless of where the question is comes from it is still a unanswered question. They must prove their findings they cant just pull things out then refuse to prove it. How did they prove the flood didnt happen? Did they even prove anything or did they just assume it didnt happen and their peers bought it up like the good lil sheep they are ?
Cock sucking puppet? I bet you are the same person in 2 accounts with 666thSon!! Whyt the fuck do you have too many user accounts on youtube! You're merely spamming! You're not even worth 1 second of my life span!!!!!!!
@glassbrain The reality is that creation is origin origin is supernatural. If you look at the galaxies stars, they do violate the laws of physics. No such thing as gravity nor dark matter and we know gravity were just a theory.
I don't know where you're trying to get something about colds. Einstein did something about that as well:
watch?v=nh0MJFQvlvw
Wake up! The reality of atheism is a fraud LIE DECEIT!
Spiritring claimed on another video that they are a medical student in Europe. HAHA. Spiritring doesn't even know what a peer reviewed scientific journal is. You should look at this other video.
watch?v=vuVSIG265b4
I look like a broken record because this person doesn't understand basic science or logic. It's mind numbing.
Again. Stop that stupid claim that we only say God did it. DNA is information and cannot form by the so called primordial soup or "tornadoes did it"
I'd like to quote one straight from the evolutionists mouth, "watch?v=_T0tCJBmjJ8" Watch the quotation of evolutionist by creationist. Also notice how he speaks all science and merely said "God did it?" I'm sure origin is affected by ideology that's why evolution vs creation means atheist vs theists.
I don't know if I can trust European doctors after you've been claiming to be a European medical student. Based on what I've observed from you, you don't even have to understand basic biology. What a joke.
Isaac Newton himself - "Law, order and harmony in the universe are so mysterious and could only be answered by the powerful intelligent creator whom I call the Lord God."
Einstein - "I was utterly humiliated by dimly understanding the complete harmony and the secret of the invisible elements in which it operates."
Haha, intelligence. No intelligent person thinks that youtube videos serve the purpose of peer reviewed research. Also, no intelligent person tries to say that engineering is not science. You're a joke.
Oh well, that's not even the case. DNA is proven information. The origin of it is simply Linguistics laws the VERY VERY proof to things as knowledge and intelligence. It's like an encoded message like pages of information written in an infinite number of books! It's too complex for random natural process! Origin of information basically is the most solid speculation of it's origin. You may think that aliens did it but aliens would have originated to information been originated by God.
No, it's a molecule that interacts with other molecules. It can be represented as a code, but it's far different than a language. It matches up with other molecules based on physical laws.
There are no physical laws found to form protein! FIND! NON No physical law to form the DNA itself! It's already information and look at the odds of the primordial soup - 1 part in 10 times 10 to the power of one hundred and thirty four! Only a miracle would do this. And no, creationist doesn't deny natural laws. We all know, law and order in the universe points to creation nor do we fully understand what the element of space is in which this laws operate.
You're basically saying that because the origins of life aren't completely understood, god must have done it. That is a logical fallacy. Also, protein formation is iterative. It does happen all at once, as your imaginary statistic is suggesting.
I've quoted the origin of life videos down here and you'll actually get educated. This video is pastor viewed the ones we're slided by a legit bio chemist who actually has and actual evidence against the evolution origin of life.
There's no way a 10-20 page research article is present in his slide shows. But since you keep claiming that this peer reviewed literature exists, please provide the articles, not youtube videos.
It's easy to find that I know but videos I quoted we're hour of explanation of where we're debating! You're just trying to lose the argument were you've always been lost. OH MY GOD! YOU'RE SO BRAINWASHED!
Uh no, I'm trying to remain scientific. Unfortunately, you don't understand even the basics of science and therefore do not understand the scientific method.
Complexity does not destroy evolution. Complexity just gives Christians a reason to try to force the idea that god must have done it because everything is too complex. This is a cop out.
Of course we don't go straight that God did it. We look for natural processes out there but in fact we've only find debunking evolution and the impossibility of it. Again, no need to explain the origins or how the world get to being. It simply is completely different ball park something that should assist philosophy and world views. Or should you say mud did it.
Burden of proof = on atheism. You've never shown us replacement for God only self creation bullshit and chance and the multiverse! No evidence for that causational strand.
Basic accepted cosmological argument and won on courts was :
1. The universe had a beginning, therfore it has a cause
2. Only logical possibility is if it has a cause that is uncause and that is BEYOND time and matter before these realities get to being
Fallacy! Matter should not exist BEFORE matter. The big bang steps on it's own foot and states it began with zero volume and infinite density which we call NOTHING.
Bible declares, God created the world out of nothing. Abra the Hebrew word used was nothing. Nothing created the universe? Makes sense to stupid bullshit like you!
You're actually a strong materialist I could quote videos for that AS WELL.
Videos we're overwhelming evidence of how improbable the primordial soup was. Unless you understand what's that even is. Learn to watch articles and peer reviewed science.
God had always been in science. The burden of proof of atheism is the burden of proof of evolution. Science COMPLETELY improbable AND untestable with evolution.
Spiritring if you are unable to do anything but refer people to videos, you are truly the laughing stock.
But of course, you already neglected to define what a change from one species to another would or could be deined as, so you've already demonstrated you are devoid of any personal intelligence or reasoning capabilities.
Actually, you brought up the soft tissue found in the tyrannosaurus rex fossil. I discovered that the protein fragments actually match best with chicken proteins. You seemed to ignore this because it does not help your ignorant views. You also don't even know what peer reviewed literature since you don't seem to be able to provide any articles that prove your point. You claim that it's obvious that evolution is wrong, it should be easy to find peer reviewed scientific literature.
No I brought up peer reviewed evidence against primordial prebiotic soup process as well as cell complexity. Information is immaterial. It's an example of a trancendant truth. You may think that aliens did it but these aliens would also contain origin of information that is created by God. Only by God. Supernatural = proven!
Please refer to my last comments. You have provided youtube videos, NOT peer reviewed science. You must be failing as a medical student if you can't even understand what a peer reviewed scientific article is.
Holy Cow. Utterly dishonest, deliberately misleading, and frankly an insult to both good science and good religion. An exercise in snake-oil salesmanship.
Radiometric dating has been tested against samples of known age and shown to be very accurate.... more accurate even than human record keeping. These stories have been floating around for ages, and have all been deliberate misquoting of the actual results.
Exactly. The deliberate dishonesty presented in this video is mind blowing. It's funny that they mention Potassium Argon dating in reference to Mt. St. Helen. Obviously if you reheat the sample, Argon can be released and skewed measurements will result.
Please, everyone, watch a video from a real scientists.
watch?v=iGDrq8rikJc
I know Christians don't want to belive it, but they happen to know more about science than pastors.
Because apparently your uninformed and incredibly ignorant opinion refutes decades of scientific research? Do you still not understand what a peer reviewed scientific article is? It's amazing to me that you insist on believing people that are far from being experts. Do you see witch doctors for your medical problems? I wouldn't think you know how to see a doctor since a doctor would actually know about medical related issues.
There are absolutely tons of evidences to refute radiometric dating. Including Dinosaur flesh and young DNA artifact and archeological evidences that human beings saw dragons that can literally describe the creatures predicted by science.
As I've already pointed out, no DNA was found in the dinosaur tissue. Fragments of tissue was found. Your inability to form objective thought strikes you to jump to a wild conclusion based on your bronze age myths, despite the fact that you have the scientific understanding comparable to a third grader. You are useless to the world.
Nice. Your lack of comprehension is now more evident. She says that certain structures LOOK to be blood cells. Further tests must be conducted. Now, if you research more, you can find that collagen extracted from this sample compares quite well to collagen from birds, supporting the idea that birds and dinosaurs are related. I doubt you'll acknowledge that since it doesn't help your point. Once again, I'll listen to the scientists.
All of Billys sources have been sited by him you just have to wacth the whole series to get the whole picture. Evolution is bullshit and so ar ethese scientific dating methods. I believe science has been harmed by Darwin and his "theory". The course of science Darwin has presented is impossible to believe and sciene has proven it to be wrong time and again.STOP BIENG SPOONFED THIS LIE
whatever you gotta tell yourself to get by man. see when I look through my teliscope I see a young solar system full of young planets. Besides if yopur right then the atmosphere millions of years ago would have produced hurricanes the size of north america and thats just getting warmed up WE COULDNT HAVE SURVIVED THAT much less evolved and if we did evole what did we eat where would we have found food see everything had to be here at one time for us to be alive stop believing this lie damn
I think you need to find a new source for your information, as you can't seem to make one valid point. Go read something based on evidence, not personal bias.
How about you find some evidence to prove me wrong. You say I am wrong but where is your evidence and scientific truths Dont bring me theories either I want solid facts so bring me some.
disprove God first all I bring you is my faith. I dont need theories and you disprove me first then I will disprove you and just because someone chalklegnges your beliefs dont get butt hurt about it dude your very rude and un-civil
The same applies to your theory too thanks for proving things that are not fact cannot be proven as scientifict truths. SO show me your evidence of evolution and start with the cosmic evolution because if you cannot prove the big bang then nothing esle in the stages of evolution could follow. let me put it in laymans terms if you count to six you have to start with one understand? and 2 doesnt come after zero got it? give me proof and i will take it into consideration
No, it doesn't. You clearly have an extremely obtuse view of reality. Evolution is about speciation, nothing more. If you don't even know what you are arguing about, how can you be against it?
And if you are against so much of science, why do you take full advantage of all the benefits?
I can already see how you will debate, which is you will start somewhere, and as I crush all your pointless comments you will simply change the topic to sometihng completely different.
lol debate me then dont be scared it just you have no evidence and my reality is mine and you need not worry about how I view things. Just because I want to be a free thinker and will not conform to your ideals is my choice. I am not agaisnt science I am agaisnt politicians who think they are scientists and know science. Then they want to teach there ideals in schools not scientific truths thats all I am bitching about man. I dont care if the evolutiopnary theory is true but it has to be proven
prove those fossils evolved prove they even reproduced? and the embryyological devlopement looks past the fact that DNA cannot be rewritten thus not changing. And the man who thought that up has even admitted that. as a matter of fact when people and animals reproduce they actually LOSE DNA. name a birth thathad new DNA and not the mother and fathers? And dont tell me weeb feet is an evolution its a mutation and you know that. so what are you trying to prove and yes you do have to prove it
Prove these fossils reproduced? Isnt the definition of any carbon based life form, that it reproduces? You're objection is seriously and irrevocably flawed.
I don't have to prove anything to you, your ignorance is your issue. Evolution happens -- things change over time, get over it.
Yet the only way evolution is true is that if there is a God. The whole process was just a mess! You don't NEED Evolution! That's not what you see around you!
Yes, change over time is exactly what I see around me. Case in point, I am entirely different from my parents, as my parents are from their parents, and as my children will be from my grandparents. This is all so terribly complicated, isn't it?
That is because of DNA. Genetic locks are proven. No new species will reproduce completely different specie Like Horse giving birth to a fish or a banana. That is not what you see around. There's no change over time. Only minor changes based on adaptation ability of the species! No new species are arising from adaptation. Only variations in dogs in breeds but they're exactly the same specie of dogs.
No one says a horse gives birth to a fish or a banana, so once again, you are arguing something you don't understand. Do you know what adaptation means? You failed at defining it in terms of genetics when I asked you previously. Do you insist on remaining ignorant?
Yes, horses produce horses and not fishes - and definitely not bananas. This is very basic biology.
Please explain how nylon-eating fruit flies fit into your claim that life will not change.
Yes, there is change over time, this should be blatantly obvious to even the deepest cave-dwelling creationist. Simple evolutionary algorithms, or observations of life will back this up as a poven fact.
We change overtime via variation and races or languages but no new species are arising from this process. Everything is observed, no linear strand EVER of change from specie to another type of specie happened. NON! In history of science.
Bible said that In the beginning God created Man and Woman. What's the beginning? Where is the beginning! Would it be billions of years after the earth is created? No logical fallacy. Tons of evidence to refute radiometric dating, dinosaurs existence MORE!
You could find a bunny rabbit fossil dating back to hundreds of millions of years ago, you'd be able to refute the fossil record. Unfortunately for you, this hasn't happened.
Unfortunately for you, the fossil record agrees with an old earth and evolution. Please find an animal out of place in evolutionary history and you will shake the scientific community. Also, way to ignore the fact that I showed your claims of dino DNA to be pointless. Seriously, people that aren't scientists shouldn't be allowed to comment on science. We have morons like you that they actually know anything. Stick to being ignorant.
Haha, are you still throwing the same stupid videos at me. PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE. RESEARCH. Do any of those ideas make sense to you? NOT YOUTUBE VIDEOS. You are the one being laughed at for your childish comprehension and laughable grasp on science. You automatically think everything points to young earth. By the way, what do you actually do? Have you ever been to college?
YOUTUBE VIDEOS that contain peer reviewed data from creation origin science is much better than wiki or google articles! IDIOT! Learn to watch all these videos!
You're right, peer reviewed data is better than wiki or google articles. Do you have any peer reviewed data? Based on the last Youtube video, you seem to think that peer reviewed data is a youtube video. You have yet to provide me with peer reviewed scientific literature that supports your claim. You don't even know what this means.
That's it?! Google? Wiki? Did you get a cookie now!
Uniquely I'm studying medicine about to get doctorates. seriously , I could just say that I'm a scientist but i won't lie just as what you're doing here.
Take note that all of the videos I've quoted were hours worth of explaining the data against evolution and if you don't know anything, I got more(continued):
Wow, this guy is actively making America dumber.
ophidial 2 months ago
Anybody who believes this shit is a fucking moron. I said it. I don't fucking care. You creationists are more than willing to live in a world dominated by science. You fly in jets, use the internet, and partake in the 'miracles' of modern medicine, yet none of you can logically think for yourselves. Superstition and bronze age myths are more important and hold more weight?
Fucking turds.
JeanetteTherese 9 months ago 7
You sound angry. Are you mad because you know that hes right and your wrong? You wouldnt last in no real creation vs evolution debate because of all your cursing and beligirant behavior. They would throw you out the debate room. And usuall when people dont have an argument they do exactly what you just did. Whine, cry and act like a baby
SapphireDiamond19 3 months ago
@SapphireDiamond19 Ha! Another turd. You have nothing. You believe this shit yet you have never read or studied the evidence he is distorting/making-up. Where did he get his information? What books (Hint: Creationists wrote them) and studies is he quoting ? In what context were these errors given? Does he/you know that there are many forms of dating methods? Do you even understand how science works? How studies are conducted and published?
JeanetteTherese 3 months ago
@SapphireDiamond19 Not everything is going to be 100% in science, we are only human, mistakes do happen. But you bible thumping christians are too ignorant to even try to comprehend this stuff. Need a quick and easy answer. Something that makes you feel good. Don't believe me? Here, I will prove it. How do you know earth was created 6k years ago? Oh, that's right, a book.
JeanetteTherese 3 months ago
@SapphireDiamond19 Who was I debating? No one, at the time. Crucial info was missing. But I will indulge you. Go to 3:24. The third paragraph is talking about snails and false dating on the shells. This is called the "reservoir effect." Scientitst know about it and I learned about it in 9th grade. They test for it and take it into account. This effect is also applicable to other "studies" he mentioned.
Anyways, I actually left a comment. Learn the difference.
JeanetteTherese 3 months ago
@JeanetteTherese prove what he is saying wrong. show us
kb24crazylaker 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kb24crazylaker Here's part of my comment to SapphireDiamond19... 2 or 3 comments down from yours!
"Go to 3:24. The third paragraph is talking about snails and false dating on the shells. This is called the "reservoir effect." Scientitst know about it and I learned about it in 9th grade. They test for it and take it into account. This effect is also applicable to other "studies" he mentioned."
You want me to debunk all of them on Youtube? You're a fool. Go read a book other than the bible.
JeanetteTherese 3 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese " Fly in jets, use the internet " This has nothing to do with dating techniques, or evolution.
So if you agree with using the internet or flying in a jet, Then you have to agree with all scientific theories ? What a block head you are ^^
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@mukkohaha You should become a christian apologetic. You have clearly demonstrated that you are a master of the craft.
JeanetteTherese 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese What i said had nothing to do with either Creationism or Evolution, nor Science at any level.
I was talking about you, and your logic. What a blockhead you are.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@mukkohaha My logic? You quote mined me. You did exactly what a little creationist would do. You took my whole comment out of context and used it to make your feeble mind feel better. Thanks for proving just how dishonest creationists are.
JeanetteTherese 2 weeks ago 2
@JeanetteTherese " a little creationist " why do you talk like that ? do i call you " a tiny little dishonest evolutionist "
Do i generalize and think of you as a group of people ? No, i'm not a blockhead like yourself. I'm talking to you specifically, no person who believed in evolution would even want to be put in group with you, so i will not generalize for their sake.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JeanetteTherese " Anybody who believes this shit is a fucking moron. I said it. I don't fucking care. You creationists are more than willing to live in a world dominated by science. You fly in jets, use the internet, and partake in the 'miracles' of modern medicine, yet none of you can logically think for yourselves. Superstition and bronze age myths are more important and hold more weight?
Fucking turds "
Just so you won't mistake me for taking something out of context
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese Creationist are more then willing to live in a world dominated by science ?
Science and Religion are not opposites first of all. Medicine, The internet and Jets are not the Opposite of Religion, Science doesn't have the answers for existentialism, " 2nd law of thermodynamics: Energy cannot be created or destroyed "
When or How did energy come ?, What fueled the big bang ? How did Non living matter turn into living matter ?
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese To this day in State of the Art labs with hundreds of years of research and the most intelligent minds in the world simply cannot turn non-living matter into living matter, It's incomprehensible and impossible. Yet the assumption of Darwinian origin of species holds the belief that non living matter turned into living matter in the soup that covered the earth in early earth stages by sheer random chance, which is only an unscientific belief.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese they don't know how the First life got created. don't know where energy came from, Or even if it ever came, or if it always were their. But if Energy always were their we embark on an infinite timeline, then this moment would simply never occur since their would be an previous event, and a previous event before that to infinity.
At some point energy did have to come, what fueled the big bang ? and at some point living matter came from non-living matter.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese you don't know shit about science or existentialism, All you can do is repeat what you were told in school and not think for yourself, yet you seem to proud of your "acquired" knowledge and curse at anyone who doesn't believe in your own unscientific belief.
Remember why it's called Big bang (Theory) and Evolution ( theory ) because it's a fucking theory. Now go read up some more on your theory that has nothing to do with science.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@mukkohaha Not understanding thermodynamics? Not understanding what a scientific theory is? Saying that evolution and the big bang have nothing to do with science? Mixing up evolution and abiogenesis? bringing up existentialism? quote mining, again? Thanks!! You proved (again) everything I already said about you!
It's sad. I can't believe the amount of mental gymnastics you put yourself through. All because you are afraid to question your beliefs. Keep reading the good book... blockhead.
JeanetteTherese 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese Ok now tell me, where did energy come from ? without breaking the laws of Thermodynamics. If you tell me " Energy has always been here " Then you believe in an infinite time line, then you don't understand the concept of time.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@mukkohaha God did it
JeanetteTherese 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese " Mixing up evolution and abiogenesis? " No i don't mix them up, it's just your unintelligent brain that overflows. You don't like to be quoted i see, that naturally comes with talking a lot of nonsensical bullshit i guess.
With no Abiogenesis their would be no Evolution. With no Big bang their would be no Evolution or No Abiogenesis, Even a deluded retard like yourself should be able to understand this.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@mukkohaha You do realize that none of these theories need the other to survive? Right? I guess you really don't. If you did, you wouldn't make such retarded comments.
I have a truly hard time understanding why you fear these theories so much? They don't try to disprove god. They try to understand the world around us. This scares you doesn't it? Maybe you should look deep in yourself and figure out why.
JeanetteTherese 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese What you just said took the Cake for most retarded statement i have ever heard.
WITHOUT Big bang, The entire Universe would not be here right now, according to Science. You do understand that Abiogenesis was the event that happened in the Prehistoric soup that turned Non-living matter into Living matter, Without Living matter NO Evolution.
Jeanette don't reply back, your a retarded lost cause.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese To sum it up for a retard like yourself
No Big bang = No universe & Formation of planets No Universe & No formartion of Planets = No abiogenesis, NO Abiogenesis = No evolution
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@mukkohaha How does disproving the big bang disprove evolution? If the big bang turns out to be wrong, then all that means is we still don't know what brought the universe into existence.
What is your answer to these questions that people much smarter than you are working on? Seriously! I have yet to hear anything to disprove evolution, the big bang, or abiogenesis from any of your ramblings.
Again, why are you so afraid of these theories? What do they take away from you?
JeanetteTherese 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese ah ok, i understand your logic now,
And your right on that logic, I just misunderstood it, My logic just said:
At one point Everything had to come, So big bang or Any theory like it, is required for the Start, And Abiogenesis Requires a " Start " such as the big bang theory
But if Big bang never happened their is unforeseen factors that play in, that may invalidate Abiogenesis do you understand my thought pattern here ?
mukkohaha 1 week ago
@mukkohaha So you call me a retard yet it is you that cannot understand shit? And on top of that you cannot even make your point? Yeah I understand your thought pattern. Unfortunately, you couldn't explain it well enough in the first place and you acted like all the other commenters and attacked me like a child. Fuck you
JeanetteTherese 1 week ago
@JeanetteTherese oh i see now, you were right sorry to bother you :)
mukkohaha 1 week ago
@JeanetteTherese Don't be like the Flat earth folks who thought they knew everything with their " Right now their isn't any more to know, all we know now has every last factor counted in "
This way of thinking is Arrogant and retarded.
I for one believe that in 200 years Their will be many countless of things we believe right now that will be laughed at and thought as primitive science and ignorant based knowledge.
mukkohaha 1 week ago
@mukkohaha Where did I say anything along the lines of "right now their isn't any more to know..."? You are the one that is proposing that. You are the one that is disagreeing with science because it goes against your belief system. Of course science will change in 200 years. Science is actually looking to explain. Your bible hasn't changed in 2000.
Flat earth? I think you are speaking about yourself and your fellow creationists.
JeanetteTherese 1 week ago
@JeanetteTherese Afraid ? I'm not afraid of these theories, i'm just amazed at how ignorant people are " people much smarter " These people are Blinded from the truth. Right from the Start they say that " Intelligent design " is not an option, so they will always look away from that possibility.
Even tho every last shred of Nature and Science screams towards intelligent design. And they will make a Huge pile of shit Theories to get around it.
This is what i see
mukkohaha 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JeanetteTherese Now tell me, How did The first life forms emerge ? How did non-living matter Turn itself into living matter in nature (: ? by sheer random chance ?
A feat which to this day in State of the art labs with hundreds years research have been proved impossible. Even Directed Guided attempts at creating living matter out of non living matter is 100 % impossible, and you want to believe this stuff happens in Nature unguided ? in a land far away a long Long time ago ?
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
@JeanetteTherese It's one big Theory with no proof at any level.
Big bang - the formation of planets - abiogenesis - evolution <- That's one big theory, Take out the big bang for instance, and the rest would not happen, Take out abiogenesis and evolution would not have happened.
This is One huge Shit sandwich of Unproved theories from start to Finnish. But no you little gullible retard, leave me alone and go back to dream world.
mukkohaha 2 weeks ago
This man is a total Idiot if the thinks that rock from mount St. Helen was created on the day of the eruption. The radio active materials were not created on that day. He can talk fast and scream, but that will not cover up that is is an idiot.
yeudh 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@yeudh "He can talk fast and scream, but that will not cover up that is is an idiot. " yes that only increases the rate of bullshit per minute^^
gastarbeiter1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Actually your the bigger fool because you turned your back on God
SapphireDiamond19 3 months ago
Carbon 14 dating does not work on seals. They had to read the paper alerting scientists about this in order to make a big deal about it.
gregrutz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It is your lucky day with naughty hot chicks mworld5.info
LisesiHeath 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Be Naughty brides so sexy benaughtyman.info
nikinilakmali 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Neighboring naughty women record benaughtyman.info
thusharinadeeka 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Meet Sexy Girls in Your Area busizz4me.info
bolgendolki 1 year ago
Tree rings go back 10,000 years, end of lies.
gregrutz 1 year ago
15:17 "Unfortunately not all churches are very good churches"... LOL
jnoort 1 year ago
Geologist knew the earth was millions of years old, before nuclear scientists told them it is Billions of years old. OOOOOOOOLD.
gregrutz 1 year ago
his voice hurts my ears.
wikuk 1 year ago
Yeah he has many account. I'm afraid he's merely spamming. He's not really an atheist rather a agnostic.
spiritring 2 years ago
whacked out !?!
They cross check each other.
He must show every time it didn't work.
Does he think if he proves dating methods wrong that the earth is young??
gregrutz 2 years ago
@gregrutz No u can't prove evolution or creation to be true, but there's overwhelming evidence this Earth was created about 6000 years ago with a global flood 4400 years ago and the death of Jesus on the cross for our sins with a ressurection 3 days later about 2000 years ago.
purpleleach1 1 year ago
@purpleleach1 You think billy bible is evidence. Check with a Geologists, there is no evidence for a global flood and the earth is old. Go look, and don't pay any attention to those fossils.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz How about they prove it ? Every single time one of those so called experts are asked the tough questions like if a global flood can effect dating methods they always side step the question. Honest wtf is up with them do they honestly think that people are going to overlook these questions just cuz they have a pretty pocket protector? Just cuz they claim to be scientist doesn't make whatever BS they come up with auto-right . Somehow countless people buy the lie without askin questions
DarkBioCloud 1 year ago
@DarkBioCloud If you ask ''if a global flood can effect it'' they side step because you are talking about religion, not science. Geologist proved there was no global flood many years ago. Study science and you can add to the knowledge, calling it a lie won't get you far.
gregrutz 1 year ago
@gregrutz Regardless of where the question is comes from it is still a unanswered question. They must prove their findings they cant just pull things out then refuse to prove it. How did they prove the flood didnt happen? Did they even prove anything or did they just assume it didnt happen and their peers bought it up like the good lil sheep they are ?
DarkBioCloud 1 year ago
spiritring, tell me, what do you think of the seasonal cold? Is that simply an act of GOD too? Or does it change with each season?
Hahaha, spirit you're a joke - a true wackaloon.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Cock sucking puppet? I bet you are the same person in 2 accounts with 666thSon!! Whyt the fuck do you have too many user accounts on youtube! You're merely spamming! You're not even worth 1 second of my life span!!!!!!!
spiritring 2 years ago
LOL.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Reality is calling, spiritring.
glassbrain 2 years ago
@spiritring
666thSon, haha, I like that. No, I don't have multiple accounts. You're a moron.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
@glassbrain The reality is that creation is origin origin is supernatural. If you look at the galaxies stars, they do violate the laws of physics. No such thing as gravity nor dark matter and we know gravity were just a theory.
I don't know where you're trying to get something about colds. Einstein did something about that as well:
watch?v=nh0MJFQvlvw
Wake up! The reality of atheism is a fraud LIE DECEIT!
ABSURDITY!
spiritring 2 years ago
Bet, anyone? Spiritring is a poe, or simply didn't pass grade 8, not taking any high school science classes.
glassbrain 2 years ago
@glassbrain
Spiritring claimed on another video that they are a medical student in Europe. HAHA. Spiritring doesn't even know what a peer reviewed scientific journal is. You should look at this other video.
watch?v=vuVSIG265b4
I look like a broken record because this person doesn't understand basic science or logic. It's mind numbing.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Right... a medical student.
"Well you have cancer, can't help you - god did it!"
glassbrain 2 years ago
@glassbrain
Oh, and apparently engineering is not science according to spiritring.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Again. Stop that stupid claim that we only say God did it. DNA is information and cannot form by the so called primordial soup or "tornadoes did it"
I'd like to quote one straight from the evolutionists mouth, "watch?v=_T0tCJBmjJ8" Watch the quotation of evolutionist by creationist. Also notice how he speaks all science and merely said "God did it?" I'm sure origin is affected by ideology that's why evolution vs creation means atheist vs theists.
PUNKS!
spiritring 2 years ago
Dr David was a doctor from europe ad he was also a Bio chemist. He owned in new york:
watch?v=PpeOD593lCc
BYE! YOU'RE WASTING MY LIFE!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
I don't know if I can trust European doctors after you've been claiming to be a European medical student. Based on what I've observed from you, you don't even have to understand basic biology. What a joke.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
@spiritring
HAHAHA. You keep sending me these joke videos. David Berlinski has a Ph.D. in PHILOSOPHY. That is not SCIENCE. Jesus fucking Christ, you are stupid.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
It's supernatural!
Isaac Newton himself - "Law, order and harmony in the universe are so mysterious and could only be answered by the powerful intelligent creator whom I call the Lord God."
Einstein - "I was utterly humiliated by dimly understanding the complete harmony and the secret of the invisible elements in which it operates."
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
I'm really sick of repeating myself, but you just don't seem to understand anything. An argument from authority is a logical fallacy, so stop.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
I beg to differ it is me who is sick and waste my sanity and intelligence over someone like you!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Haha, intelligence. No intelligent person thinks that youtube videos serve the purpose of peer reviewed research. Also, no intelligent person tries to say that engineering is not science. You're a joke.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Oh well, that's not even the case. DNA is proven information. The origin of it is simply Linguistics laws the VERY VERY proof to things as knowledge and intelligence. It's like an encoded message like pages of information written in an infinite number of books! It's too complex for random natural process! Origin of information basically is the most solid speculation of it's origin. You may think that aliens did it but aliens would have originated to information been originated by God.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
No, it's a molecule that interacts with other molecules. It can be represented as a code, but it's far different than a language. It matches up with other molecules based on physical laws.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
There are no physical laws found to form protein! FIND! NON No physical law to form the DNA itself! It's already information and look at the odds of the primordial soup - 1 part in 10 times 10 to the power of one hundred and thirty four! Only a miracle would do this. And no, creationist doesn't deny natural laws. We all know, law and order in the universe points to creation nor do we fully understand what the element of space is in which this laws operate.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
You're basically saying that because the origins of life aren't completely understood, god must have done it. That is a logical fallacy. Also, protein formation is iterative. It does happen all at once, as your imaginary statistic is suggesting.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Intelligent design doesn't just say God did it.
Let me point out intelligent design text book definition:
Search for law and order in the universe with which can be observed as a result of a rational intelligent causation phenomena.
In EITHER way, you need a miracle for evolution. Evolutionists admits that!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Intelligent causation = god did it.
No, you don't need a miracle for evolution. DNA naturally mutates.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
rofl
glassbrain 2 years ago
sRgbz
spiritring 2 years ago
Haha, childrens watching this video who are in school will be laughing at spiritring *thumbs up*
glassbrain 2 years ago
I've quoted the origin of life videos down here and you'll actually get educated. This video is pastor viewed the ones we're slided by a legit bio chemist who actually has and actual evidence against the evolution origin of life.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
If he has evidence against evolution, this evidence will be present in a peer reviewed article. Please find this article.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
The article were in the slides he shows while he was reciting. LITERATURE!!!!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
There's no way a 10-20 page research article is present in his slide shows. But since you keep claiming that this peer reviewed literature exists, please provide the articles, not youtube videos.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
It's easy to find that I know but videos I quoted we're hour of explanation of where we're debating! You're just trying to lose the argument were you've always been lost. OH MY GOD! YOU'RE SO BRAINWASHED!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Uh no, I'm trying to remain scientific. Unfortunately, you don't understand even the basics of science and therefore do not understand the scientific method.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Look up complexity destroys evolution
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Complexity does not destroy evolution. Complexity just gives Christians a reason to try to force the idea that god must have done it because everything is too complex. This is a cop out.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Of course we don't go straight that God did it. We look for natural processes out there but in fact we've only find debunking evolution and the impossibility of it. Again, no need to explain the origins or how the world get to being. It simply is completely different ball park something that should assist philosophy and world views. Or should you say mud did it.
spiritring 2 years ago
Burden of proof = on atheism. You've never shown us replacement for God only self creation bullshit and chance and the multiverse! No evidence for that causational strand.
Basic accepted cosmological argument and won on courts was :
1. The universe had a beginning, therfore it has a cause
2. Only logical possibility is if it has a cause that is uncause and that is BEYOND time and matter before these realities get to being
Look up the cosmological laws.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
I don't need to show that there's a replacement for god. I already have no reason to believe in god.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
You must replace it with nothing. Alright that's acceptable.
Nothing created the universe. Alright! That sound stupid it makes sense for you.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Matter and energy created the universe. Astrophysics supports this.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Fallacy! Matter should not exist BEFORE matter. The big bang steps on it's own foot and states it began with zero volume and infinite density which we call NOTHING.
Bible declares, God created the world out of nothing. Abra the Hebrew word used was nothing. Nothing created the universe? Makes sense to stupid bullshit like you!
You're actually a strong materialist I could quote videos for that AS WELL.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Matter has always existed.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Matter began. Universe began! You're self refuting! Big Bang proved that!!!!!!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
I said that matter has always existed. Pay attention.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Matter did not exist before matter. Idiot! The big bang even proved me!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Matter has always existed.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Videos we're overwhelming evidence of how improbable the primordial soup was. Unless you understand what's that even is. Learn to watch articles and peer reviewed science.
spiritring 2 years ago
Again:
God had always been in science. The burden of proof of atheism is the burden of proof of evolution. Science COMPLETELY improbable AND untestable with evolution.
spiritring 2 years ago
(Origin of Life part 6)
watch?v=xRITC2sU4hg
spiritring 2 years ago
(Origin of Life Part 5)
watch?v=iaRU5EcCjQc
spiritring 2 years ago
(Origin of Life part 4)
watch?v=_T0tCJBmjJ8
spiritring 2 years ago
(Origin of Life part 3)
watch?v=1V-4rxR-1u8
spiritring 2 years ago
(Origin of Life part 2)
watch?v=k51sEw_sZlE
spiritring 2 years ago
(Origin Of Life Part 1)
watch?v=XcWjEMqCHQE
spiritring 2 years ago
Spiritring if you are unable to do anything but refer people to videos, you are truly the laughing stock.
But of course, you already neglected to define what a change from one species to another would or could be deined as, so you've already demonstrated you are devoid of any personal intelligence or reasoning capabilities.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Devoid indeed as there are no peer reviewed data of actual evolutionary process to support for example a reptile to bird evolution. FRAUD
REFUTED
LIE!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Actually, you brought up the soft tissue found in the tyrannosaurus rex fossil. I discovered that the protein fragments actually match best with chicken proteins. You seemed to ignore this because it does not help your ignorant views. You also don't even know what peer reviewed literature since you don't seem to be able to provide any articles that prove your point. You claim that it's obvious that evolution is wrong, it should be easy to find peer reviewed scientific literature.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
No I brought up peer reviewed evidence against primordial prebiotic soup process as well as cell complexity. Information is immaterial. It's an example of a trancendant truth. You may think that aliens did it but these aliens would also contain origin of information that is created by God. Only by God. Supernatural = proven!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Please refer to my last comments. You have provided youtube videos, NOT peer reviewed science. You must be failing as a medical student if you can't even understand what a peer reviewed scientific article is.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Peer reviewed evidences from videos.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
You don't seem to understand what peer reviewed means. You don't seem to understand what a scientific journal is. Just give up on life.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
I know what a peer reviewed literature is! Stop it! You're humiliating yourself!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
You obviously don't because you keep giving me youtube videos and have yet to mention any credible scientific journals.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Way to fear where you've lost it.
spiritring 2 years ago
You see, this whole idea of atheism being rational and scientific is plain booty shaking of their own sisters:
watch?v=Xd79_Yd2VSI
spiritring 2 years ago
Holy Cow. Utterly dishonest, deliberately misleading, and frankly an insult to both good science and good religion. An exercise in snake-oil salesmanship.
Radiometric dating has been tested against samples of known age and shown to be very accurate.... more accurate even than human record keeping. These stories have been floating around for ages, and have all been deliberate misquoting of the actual results.
FiverBeyond 2 years ago
@FiveBeyond
@FiverBeyond
Exactly. The deliberate dishonesty presented in this video is mind blowing. It's funny that they mention Potassium Argon dating in reference to Mt. St. Helen. Obviously if you reheat the sample, Argon can be released and skewed measurements will result.
Please, everyone, watch a video from a real scientists.
watch?v=iGDrq8rikJc
I know Christians don't want to belive it, but they happen to know more about science than pastors.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Evolution is a mess, Radio metric dating is
watch?v=plX7uClv6WE
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Because apparently your uninformed and incredibly ignorant opinion refutes decades of scientific research? Do you still not understand what a peer reviewed scientific article is? It's amazing to me that you insist on believing people that are far from being experts. Do you see witch doctors for your medical problems? I wouldn't think you know how to see a doctor since a doctor would actually know about medical related issues.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
There are absolutely tons of evidences to refute radiometric dating. Including Dinosaur flesh and young DNA artifact and archeological evidences that human beings saw dragons that can literally describe the creatures predicted by science.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
As I've already pointed out, no DNA was found in the dinosaur tissue. Fragments of tissue was found. Your inability to form objective thought strikes you to jump to a wild conclusion based on your bronze age myths, despite the fact that you have the scientific understanding comparable to a third grader. You are useless to the world.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
there is:
watch?v=qG5B7x_uDlE
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Nice. Your lack of comprehension is now more evident. She says that certain structures LOOK to be blood cells. Further tests must be conducted. Now, if you research more, you can find that collagen extracted from this sample compares quite well to collagen from birds, supporting the idea that birds and dinosaurs are related. I doubt you'll acknowledge that since it doesn't help your point. Once again, I'll listen to the scientists.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
No, there is not tons of evidence. If there was, it wouldn't be used. Please show evidence for each assertion you make.
glassbrain 2 years ago
If only you could talk to my evolu..I mean Biology teacher.
Jmonkey515 2 years ago
Christians have such an affinity for the ridiculous. This guy is a joke.
aweston916 2 years ago
Great Video Pastor Billy
eph2810 2 years ago
If you talk fast it sounds like you know what you are talking about.
What does he say that proves the earth is young?
ARDI is 4.4 million years old.
gregrutz 2 years ago
All of Billys sources have been sited by him you just have to wacth the whole series to get the whole picture. Evolution is bullshit and so ar ethese scientific dating methods. I believe science has been harmed by Darwin and his "theory". The course of science Darwin has presented is impossible to believe and sciene has proven it to be wrong time and again.STOP BIENG SPOONFED THIS LIE
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
Geologist know the earth was millions of years old 200 years ago, before dating methods were discovered
gregrutz 2 years ago
whatever you gotta tell yourself to get by man. see when I look through my teliscope I see a young solar system full of young planets. Besides if yopur right then the atmosphere millions of years ago would have produced hurricanes the size of north america and thats just getting warmed up WE COULDNT HAVE SURVIVED THAT much less evolved and if we did evole what did we eat where would we have found food see everything had to be here at one time for us to be alive stop believing this lie damn
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
I think you need to find a new source for your information, as you can't seem to make one valid point. Go read something based on evidence, not personal bias.
glassbrain 2 years ago
How about you find some evidence to prove me wrong. You say I am wrong but where is your evidence and scientific truths Dont bring me theories either I want solid facts so bring me some.
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
Why don't you provide evidence for your assertions then? What we know about the universe simply doesn't point to what you believe, get over it.
glassbrain 2 years ago
disprove God first all I bring you is my faith. I dont need theories and you disprove me first then I will disprove you and just because someone chalklegnges your beliefs dont get butt hurt about it dude your very rude and un-civil
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
Disprove god? How about you disprove leprachauns, unicorns, goblins, hobbits, and the rest of them?
Until something is proven, we don't require evidence to "disbeleive it". This is nonsensial.
glassbrain 2 years ago
The same applies to your theory too thanks for proving things that are not fact cannot be proven as scientifict truths. SO show me your evidence of evolution and start with the cosmic evolution because if you cannot prove the big bang then nothing esle in the stages of evolution could follow. let me put it in laymans terms if you count to six you have to start with one understand? and 2 doesnt come after zero got it? give me proof and i will take it into consideration
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
No, it doesn't. You clearly have an extremely obtuse view of reality. Evolution is about speciation, nothing more. If you don't even know what you are arguing about, how can you be against it?
And if you are against so much of science, why do you take full advantage of all the benefits?
I can already see how you will debate, which is you will start somewhere, and as I crush all your pointless comments you will simply change the topic to sometihng completely different.
glassbrain 2 years ago
lol debate me then dont be scared it just you have no evidence and my reality is mine and you need not worry about how I view things. Just because I want to be a free thinker and will not conform to your ideals is my choice. I am not agaisnt science I am agaisnt politicians who think they are scientists and know science. Then they want to teach there ideals in schools not scientific truths thats all I am bitching about man. I dont care if the evolutiopnary theory is true but it has to be proven
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
Evidence for evolution: Transitional fossils, atavisms, anatomical vestiges, DNA redundancy, retroviruses, observed instances of speciation, homology, embryological developement.
I can hear you running to answers in genesis now to find a rebuttal.
glassbrain 2 years ago
prove those fossils evolved prove they even reproduced? and the embryyological devlopement looks past the fact that DNA cannot be rewritten thus not changing. And the man who thought that up has even admitted that. as a matter of fact when people and animals reproduce they actually LOSE DNA. name a birth thathad new DNA and not the mother and fathers? And dont tell me weeb feet is an evolution its a mutation and you know that. so what are you trying to prove and yes you do have to prove it
Iraqveterankill4real 2 years ago
Comment removed
glassbrain 2 years ago
Prove these fossils reproduced? Isnt the definition of any carbon based life form, that it reproduces? You're objection is seriously and irrevocably flawed.
I don't have to prove anything to you, your ignorance is your issue. Evolution happens -- things change over time, get over it.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Yet the only way evolution is true is that if there is a God. The whole process was just a mess! You don't NEED Evolution! That's not what you see around you!
spiritring 2 years ago
Yes, change over time is exactly what I see around me. Case in point, I am entirely different from my parents, as my parents are from their parents, and as my children will be from my grandparents. This is all so terribly complicated, isn't it?
glassbrain 2 years ago
That is because of DNA. Genetic locks are proven. No new species will reproduce completely different specie Like Horse giving birth to a fish or a banana. That is not what you see around. There's no change over time. Only minor changes based on adaptation ability of the species! No new species are arising from adaptation. Only variations in dogs in breeds but they're exactly the same specie of dogs.
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
No one says a horse gives birth to a fish or a banana, so once again, you are arguing something you don't understand. Do you know what adaptation means? You failed at defining it in terms of genetics when I asked you previously. Do you insist on remaining ignorant?
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
Yes, horses produce horses and not fishes - and definitely not bananas. This is very basic biology.
Please explain how nylon-eating fruit flies fit into your claim that life will not change.
Yes, there is change over time, this should be blatantly obvious to even the deepest cave-dwelling creationist. Simple evolutionary algorithms, or observations of life will back this up as a poven fact.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Already backed that one up:
watch?v=_s9oKio-fEU
We change overtime via variation and races or languages but no new species are arising from this process. Everything is observed, no linear strand EVER of change from specie to another type of specie happened. NON! In history of science.
You finally agree with me.
spiritring 2 years ago
Spirit, I am not watching a seven minute creationist propaganda video, please relay the salient points so they may be addressed.
Unless you actually put anything forward you are just blowing hot air - so put up, or shut up.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Bible said that In the beginning God created Man and Woman. What's the beginning? Where is the beginning! Would it be billions of years after the earth is created? No logical fallacy. Tons of evidence to refute radiometric dating, dinosaurs existence MORE!
spiritring 2 years ago
Please see previous two posts.
glassbrain 2 years ago
Oh spirit, one last thing - please define what a change from one species of animal to another would be defined as?
glassbrain 2 years ago
Fossil record was indeed refuted!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
You could find a bunny rabbit fossil dating back to hundreds of millions of years ago, you'd be able to refute the fossil record. Unfortunately for you, this hasn't happened.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
I'm pretty sure they'd find it. DNA !
spiritring 2 years ago
Unfortunately for you, the fossil record agrees with an old earth and evolution. Please find an animal out of place in evolutionary history and you will shake the scientific community. Also, way to ignore the fact that I showed your claims of dino DNA to be pointless. Seriously, people that aren't scientists shouldn't be allowed to comment on science. We have morons like you that they actually know anything. Stick to being ignorant.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
BIASED!!!! FUCKING PSEUDO SCIENTIFIC, AFFIXLY RELIGIOUS NUTS!!!!
You are being laughed out!
Evidence for Great Flood, Global warming points to young earth:
watch?v=6NjBXMGqM-k
Radio metric dating, YOUR basis - INACCURATE SHIT!
No billions of years, IDIOT! BRAIN WASHED!
FOSSIL RECORD! = ASSUMPTION!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
Haha, are you still throwing the same stupid videos at me. PEER REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE. RESEARCH. Do any of those ideas make sense to you? NOT YOUTUBE VIDEOS. You are the one being laughed at for your childish comprehension and laughable grasp on science. You automatically think everything points to young earth. By the way, what do you actually do? Have you ever been to college?
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
YOUTUBE VIDEOS that contain peer reviewed data from creation origin science is much better than wiki or google articles! IDIOT! Learn to watch all these videos!
spiritring 2 years ago
@spiritring
You're right, peer reviewed data is better than wiki or google articles. Do you have any peer reviewed data? Based on the last Youtube video, you seem to think that peer reviewed data is a youtube video. You have yet to provide me with peer reviewed scientific literature that supports your claim. You don't even know what this means.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
That's it?! Google? Wiki? Did you get a cookie now!
Uniquely I'm studying medicine about to get doctorates. seriously , I could just say that I'm a scientist but i won't lie just as what you're doing here.
Take note that all of the videos I've quoted were hours worth of explaining the data against evolution and if you don't know anything, I got more(continued):
spiritring 2 years ago