scientists try to single out an answer when there is a dualtiy how can you eliminate one truth to prove another without perceptual ignorance. the fact of the matter is fear has no individual purpose, it can only benefit others! heres scientists that say im right ur wrong (immature/juvenile) I believe in global warming but not a divine universal power that coordinates the manifestation of matter that their giant brains still cant do yet their opinion is law? do your own thinking!
MIT climate scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen has observed that “Ordinary people see through man-made climate fears -- but educated people are very vulnerable.”
The idea that CO2, a trace essential gas in the atmosphere that humans exhale from their mouth, is the main climate driver is now being challenged by peer-reviewed studies, data and scientists from around the globe.
Don't worry the truth will come out eventually. Those warmists that have perptuated this hoax will be prosecuted.
People have fallen for the climate change bullshit hook line and sinker and I was one of those people. I'm not anymore.
Too much evidence has shown that climate alarmists have lied repeatedly to prove their side of the argument and that they stand to earn a Lot of money, eg Al Gore.
The climate changes naturally. That is all. Carbon dioxide is the result of temperature chsnge not the other way round do why tax co2 production? Money money moneymoney money money......
@yogbert Your basic argument is that you are gullible. Good point!
Trouble is, you now have a credibility problem.
Seems to me that you have fallen hook line & sinker for the seudo-science of the oil and coal industries. If the CO2 increase in the atmosphere was the result of temperature change, then the ocean level of CO2 should fall by a corresponding amount. Problem, is that it isn't. Ocean CO2 levels are rising making the oceans more acidic - say goodbye to coral reefs & shell fish.
Anyone who claims they ‘do not believe in’ anthropogenic global warming do so because they are ignorant of the science. Because really, what they are doing is claiming they understand the science better than around 83 scientific bodies from around the world that concur that it is occurring. What strange arrogance. Plus as anyone who understands what science is knows, science isn't about belief anyway, it doesn't require a leap of faith. It's about being accepting the overwhelming evidence.
What a waist of time inviewing that guy. He didn't have anything sensible to say. The Russians must be hard up for news items. When it comes to freedom, now that they have it, they don't know what to do with it.
@RasPesher We Russians knew what to do with freedom wisely unlike you westerners who are taking it for granted. Freedom allows us to gather intelligence information during peace time efficiently just as
Espionage is as important to gather intelligence information during war time. We have experiences wt lack of freedom that led to errors after errors but now it is a different Russia wt our observation of westerner's abuse and miss use of freedom.
The irony is, the energy cartels have denied the world of clean energy, and then they are now lobbying the governments to place a carbon tax on the people for their polluting ancient outdated technologies which they have forced upon our planet anyway. AND they expect US to pay for that pollution! What a load of crap and garbage.
Gillard and Abbott and all political parties have been told by those that control the WORLD, that they must have a carbon tax. They will lose their jobs if they do not pass this carbon tax. This will be the first world tax put upon the people of earth.
The people will have to pay this tax, not industry, companies will just pass the debt by higher charges.
The earth has less carbon in the atmosphere than the past, so they LIE.
Interesting that UK people have to go on Former Communist Russia TV to have their say....who is being suppressed now??? Could it be the English??? Wonder why the BBC does not have fottage like this. I know the answer...
Dont worry people.keep buying petrol cars.Stop buying diesel,cause its pure evil. The fumes kill you and your kids slowly and you pretend you dont know why.Co2 is a colourless,tasteless,invisible gas and thats not what you see on the street,right? Look at the soot clouds in the cities-theres no such a thing as clean diesel, Mercedes from 1990 and 2010 pollute the same, but new filters make diesel particles even smaller and they go deeper into your lungs! Have a nice diesel-asthma-cancer death!
Yeah, the world has limitless resources and is an infinite trashcan. Damn those liberals for wanting fresher water to drink and fresher air to breathe. They are not looking out after us like those factory owners who make our cheap crap possible so we satisfy our empty lives with mindless consumption.
@underthebox your name is a good indication of the type of moron you are, brainwashed and living under a box. praise those liberals for making up bs claims and imposing more taxes on a threat that doesnt exist, and screw those factory owners, who create jobs and drive our economy in order for ppl like you to prosper from an industrial society. maybe you'd be better off living in a bamboo hut in the middle of the jungle, that would be the ideal lifestyle for you left-wing fruitcakes
@raza121 Hey, I'm actually a neo-conservative here to spread models of civilization to ancient societies who know nothing about maintaining a sustainable environment. If there is anything that indigenous cultures can't teach us, is how to maintain a civilization for thousands of years. I agree! Screw the industry for creating and outsourcing jobs to other countries, exploiting third-world nations of their land and minerals, to drive a self-destructive economy. I'm with you, brother.
@raza121 Bamboo hut in the middle of the jungle? Not bad. What's my other option? A 10 ft' apartment in the middle of a metropolis' sewage system with millions of people desperately trying to entertain the American dream?
@playgrrrr gas extraction hydrofrakking........by the same folks who will be trading carbon credits.......how about we cease doin that instaed of dicking with climate nonsense?
it would have a beneficial impact, wouldnt you agree?why is that level of poinsoning allowed to produce another source of co2?
Please google: "wikipedia list of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"
The supposed "unanimous consensus" is absolute bullshit. Water vapor is approximately 95-100x the greenhouse gas CO2 is. Temperatures have been increasing ever since the end of the Little Ice Age (again, google). There is massive disputes over the validity and accuracy of the "ice core data", and there are disputes over where ice is dec. and inc. at various locations around the world.
There is no consensus you fucking asshole. All the climatologists who disagree with political agenda IPCC is forcing forward exited this UN body long ago. Quoting wiki or UN pages is not really stating facts. It's like asking nazi government if there are death camps up and running. You know what they will answer.
There is warming.
But there IS NO CONSENSUS ABOUT WHAT'S CAUSING IT.
Get this through your thick head. The only consensus that exists about AGW is POLITICAL, not scientific.
@oporim sigh...willful ignorance. i can see now you didnt read those links i mailed you, derailing your current logic train. you can take a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. youre not interested in facts only in reinforcing what you think... youre a barely conscious monkey
3000 "scientists" support your theory. 30,000 scientists have spoken out against antropogenic global warming, but the corporate media ignores the side, who's still up for debate. Why?
Well, because as the prophet GOre said, "THE DEBATE IS OVER".
So it is for me. I'm set and ready. Question is, are you?
@oporim The controversy is significantly more pronounced in the popular media than in the scientific literature,[1] where there is a strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases. No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view,[2][3] though a few organisations hold non-committal positions
@oporim quit miseducating people you idiot youre clearly the one who needs to do some reading i mean youre too stupid to even think c02 keeps the suns heat in you have some facts about ocean c02 but you dont understand the carbon cycle and you obviously dont read and your completely flipping the amount of scientist who believe it and dont your number are exactly opposite are you doing this on purpose or are you really so dumb
@0PsycoDad0 Yes, that is correct. You can visit official IPCC webpage and find there their claim, the last Assesment Report (4) was sent out to over 2400 "individual experts" and 193 member governments into fprmal review. You can find this in their AR4 PDF.
If you visit the NIPCC (org) webpage, that is a NONGOVERNMENTAL IPCC, you can find there 2009 report PDF with 31478 Americans with university degree in science (9029 PhDs) who claim the opposite.
Uh yeah maybe you should look up your "source" again cause a PhD in biblical literature doesn´t qualify you as a vaild source for climate.
Your imagined "overwhelimg" numbers is a myth perpetuated by dimtis, get it!
There is only ONE SCIENTIST, from alabama univ. me thinks, ALL the others are more or less horseshitpeddlers being hyped into "expert-status" by even dumber "experts".
Please google: "wikipedia list of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"
The supposed "unanimous consensus" is absolute bullshit. Water vapor is approximately 95-100x the greenhouse gas CO2 is. Temperatures have been increasing ever since the end of the Little Ice Age (again, google). There is massive disputes over the validity and accuracy of the "ice core data", and there are disputes over where ice is dec. and inc. at various locations around the world.
Taxation of CO2 releases (or all products connected to CO2 - most imporantly food and fuels) is a today's world genocide over poor. Luring farmers to produce stupid things like biodiesel makes food price go up significantly. Because of it people literaly die of starvation or are thrown into poverty. Paying tax on food will strike your wallet too.
So, enviro-genocidalists, when people die of hunger, mind it, it it's on your hands for supporting such lying corrupt system for no valid reason.
@narezul Oceans when they cool/warm - winter/summer, they suck up or release CO2, so it slightly fluctuates. This is just the surface water thats heating/cooling. In long term heating of the planet by Sun, deep waters heat up too and release much more CO2 and CH4, and that's what's important.
If oceans -by warming- relese 2% of stored CO2, we'll have double the ammount of CO2 in the air, while we're here fighting for 1% increase or less.
The unusual weather some countries are witnessing is due to the geo-engineering thats going on CHEMTRAILs and HAARP. the chemtrails are linked directly to SECO a huge multi-national corporation and the Rockafellers. HARRP is funded by the CFR and Bilderberg group, which are causing weather change to justify the carbon tax and its as simple as that.. There is a mountain of evidence and documented information on the net...The mainstream media including RT have a hidden agenda...
"FACT: you dont need to be a scientist to know climate change is pseudo scientific propaganda,"
Jct: But it sure helps. Though the ultimate victory comes when I bet my alarmist friend to see who'd be right in 5 years and he backed down. The global warmist backed down from a simple bet to see who wins in 5 years. Har har har. When they won't bet, they must be really sure of their facts? Not.
My friend has a shitload of arguments against me proving that climate change is true, hes a smart guy in a good university. I want to punch him in the face sometimes when he rambles on, even though I know he is wrong, I Dont do it. Can some smartass give me a couple of things which I can say are true without a doubt, that also prove the theory against climate change?
@Papiforlife if the governments were worried about climate change there would be no wars. The war machine is not carbon free is it . so if im going to turn off lights etc to help save the planet why the fuck are they using bombs planes tanks and all the other shit that uses carbon coz they know its a fraud also why cut down trees when hemp is far better for the planet they are hypocrites of the worst kind
How many of the UK pension funds are invested in the schemes thought up because of climate change, what would happen to these if Climate Change is proved a HOAX ?
One fact the liberal media left out... again, is that there is no data. East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU), destroyed it rather than let anyone see it.
Volcanic activity is neither man made nor possible for us to control - that would be like trying to change Earth's orbit around the sun which, let's face it, is the real driving force behind all the climate change in our planet's history over billions of years.
As to your second statement:
Do you mean the "evacuation" of the population, as you say, or the green Agenda 21 elimination of the population?
Love all the catastrophic video footage while the man was talking. Of course, everyone knows there were no floods, droughts, heat waves and blizzards BEFORE mankind's wanton carbon emissions. Right? There's only been floods, droughts and heatwaves SINCE the industrial age, right? Because if there actually HAD BEEN records of floods, droughts, blizzards, scorching heat, etc., well that would prove that ANIMALS had industry and THEY'RE also to blame. Right? Or maybe it was dinosaur farts?
Get ready for their next attempt to repackage the same old climate change scam as a threat to biodiversity and notice how their tame media are already shoving it down our throats with scare stories of species extinction. Extinction of species has happened all through our planet's lifetime - it happened before humans arrived on the scene and it will still happen long after we are gone.
Slavery is what this is about. Take nothing your enemy offers you, they are still smarting from the French revolution, which obviously stopped too soon, and in too small an area. The aristocracy seemingly never learns.
FACT: Carbon Dioxide has nothing to do with the climate,
FACT: Carbon Emissions rises after the climate rise
FACT: IPCC is a joke, Full of un-qualified bureaucrats one of them being the chairman, Chaudry, an engineer by trade, who has no qualification whatsover for that particular position.
FACT: Al gore's alarmist hit piece the inconvenient truth is full of errors, from start to finish.
FACT: you dont need to be a scientist to know climate change is pseudo scientific propaganda,
Ask the priest about science. Next up we'll ask Stephen Hawkins about the garden of Eden... and the mythical... ahem I mean historical snake with the ability to speak and deceive. It all comes down to the dollar, and how much of it you can grab before your time runs out.
Maybe this reverent should stick a hose from his hummer inside and roll up the windows run the motor till his tiny braincells get the proof necessary!
@underthebox I noticed something was going on. Pfff RT wants to turn some news into entertainment its a slippery slope tho. First they are non bias and before you know it they become FOX NEWS :))
@no1froggy Not quite. A billionaire is a part of the elite. But a Reverent just comes to show how desperate the billionaires have become. Seriously its stupid statements like these that makes religion look more loony that it already is.
@akulabite But it o,k to use washed up celebrities apparently to promote this climate shite,im confused as to which religion are you reffering to?, is it the green religion by any chance?, & im an athiest but id rather listen to this guy rather than Al Gore & other con artists of his ilk, the reverend is certainly more trustworthy than these sort of people as he has morals.
@no1froggy He doesn't believe in science! And as atheist you should know better. How can you agree with someone who believes in a talking snake in regards to the effects of carbon monoxide on the upper atmosphere.. Common man don't insult your intelligence.
I agree on the washed up celebrities , i don't like to listen to them either but if they are telling telling the truth , which is backed up by facts (the scientific method) then I would have to agree with them. do you agree?
@akulabite Anyone with half a brain knows that washed up celebs will go along with anything to get in the public eye so no i certainly wouldnt agree with them, & if you believe in the scientific method, which is basically a computer being told what to come up with then thats your choice, although by quoting "carbon monoxide" you are proving your ignorance, as i certainly didnt hear the reverend mention it, & as he collates his information from Piers Corbyn he is hardly anti science is he?.
@no1froggy "scientific method, which is basically a computer being told what to come up" Im speechless.... That COMPUTER put a human being on the FUCKING MOON. That computer made it so when you catch the SWINE FLU you don't pray to JESUS but you TAKE THE ANTIBIOTIC... How could you be so Intolerant when the fruits of Science have given the human species twice the life span along with countless other achievement. Thanks TO THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD! Still hate Science? MOVE TO THE MIDDLE EAST!
@akulabite That computer did not put a human being on the moon unless you are saying micro processors were around then, you just sum up the sort of people who try to be intelligent then come out with total crap, the scientists that develop drugs are not climate scientists, youll also find that in the middle east they use pharmacuticals so what in the hell are you babbling on about?,you just come across as a total fruitcake who aint got a clue what you preach.
@no1froggy Again you prove nothing more than your stupidity--> On board the Apollo
Lunar module there was a 16-bit || 4.077MHz computer. --> The example with the pharmaceuticals was not a comparison but an EXAMPLE of the scientific method applied. Just in case you forget what we are discussing here -> Its the SCIENTIFIC METHOD <-- So tell me Im wrong again OR use the scientific method to gather the facts and come up with a conclusion... thank you.
ooh look a 'reverend'... he MUST be an 'expert in the most complex 'science' on this Planet!! Pah!! These fools make themselves look more & more daft repeating the same old fosil fuel funded memes over & over till some poor sop actually believes they understand the 'science' (which of course they DON'T... except a few snippets of cherry picked data which they take out of context & claim is 'proof' its all a conspiracy.. & even the walruses are in on it).
"Modern industrial civilization has developed within a certain system of convenient myths. The driving force of modern industrial civilization has been individual material gain... Now it's long been understood - very well - that a society that is based on this principle will destroy itself in time. It can only persist - with whatever suffering and injustice it entails - as long as it's possible to pretend that the destructive forces...
"Modern industrial civilization has developed within a certain system of convenient myths. The driving force of modern industrial civilization has been individual material gain... Now it's long been understood - very well - that a society that is based on this principle will destroy itself in time. It can only persist - with whatever suffering and injustice it entails - as long as it's possible to pretend that the destructive forces...
..that humans create are limited, that the world is an infinite resource, and that the world is an infinite garbage can. At this stage of history either... the general population will take control of its own destiny and will concern itself with community issues guided by values of solidarity, and sympathy, and concern for others, or - alternatively - there will be no destiny for anyone to control." -Noam Chomsky
@CommonSensePeter The IPCC emails have been proven by independant investigations to be personal comments, and not falsification of data - FIVE TIMES OVER.
since evil humans breathe out CO2, the world leaders must impose breathing tax to make sure evil humans pay for pollution. If you cannot pay the breathing tax, your throat will be slit.
Scientists know that religions' willful refusal to accept the understanding and research of human's destructive impact on the Earth's ecological system hinders the search of sustainable solutions. If a train is coming at me, I would ask the scientist how much time I got to move out of the way and in which direction, rather than seek the reverend's non-observable, non-empirical, and non-measurable response, "Let God decide." Let's leave these irreverent religious institutions aside.
China has America right where they want us. What do you think if China has some type of security product protecting them from a dollar collapse. If they pull the plug they could win out big on the back end... America we need to produce again! Grow not just a technocrat green growth, but a grassroots return to American products paid for by banks to support American lives and trades. End the wars, end the fed, and end the cycle of money manipulation by corrupt Wall Street terrorists!!!!
The biggest CO2 producer USA's former candidate of presidency Al Gore whos surrounded by good friends own the oil companies endustrial tycoons making a movie about climate change claiming to warn the civilisation of the world against the global warming threat?It doesnt make sense at all to me.And yet the movie wins the best movie oscar.Its unpresedented for a movie in the documentary format to win an award like that.That doesnt make sense either.Where i am from its called black propaganda.
So this guy manages to believe in god, despite zero evidence for god, but doesn't believe in anthropogenic global warming, despite all the evidence supporting it? I know RT likes to be skeptic about things, but climate change has massive scientific evidence for it, and RT should consider also interviewing some real scientists.
Carbon and taxes and cap and trade will destroy industrial society and the middle class as we know them if they are passed. Also notice it puts all sorts of regulations on the US and not India or China which are both known to be huge polluters and environmental.
@PATTONM14A1 Actually, it's peak in global oil production and the subsequent decline in the availability of cheap fossil fuels that will destroy industrial society. I wouldn't worry about our fall from grace being mitigated by a carbon tax though... Industry is responsible for at least two thirds of emissions. And, as we all know, the corporations call the shots in the US.
@syyenergy7 Of course there's peak oil what a silly thing to say. There's still plenty of oil left, but it's becoming more and more in places that are harder to get to, by the simple fact that we go for the oil that's easiest to get first! And there will still be plenty of oil left when it begins taking as much energy to extract the oil as the oil itself provides. How much oil is left is simply not a good measurement of how much oil we have available to us.
@annoloki There would be "peak air" long before "peak oil'. The US has easily accessible oil in excess of several times the Middle-East. Insects exist to be scammed and used. You repeat the b.s. lines they feed people.
Boo RT... This gentleman is one of the 3 people in the world that still doesn't believe in anthropomorphic climate change. ...Way to support your owners' corporate interests in spite of the facts -- while, I would add, criticizing America for doing the same. ...By the way, I have no doubt that this REVEREND deserves my trust where matters of science are concerned!
@PeakOilCountdown I think if you do a little real research instead of buying the mainstream media's brainwashing you will find that the IPCC is actually in the minority among scientists who do real study, as opposed to computer modelling.
@pretorious700 I think melting polar ice caps, rising ocean acidity, and decades'long ice core research trumps your shiny new talking point about computer modelling. Good try though.
man i cant believe we let them tax carbon... something we exhale something plants need to grow... how fucking retarded are we to let them tax something that comes out of our lungs...
@mattman696 Hey, just to let you know that I have tried to thumbs-up your comment several times, but youtube doesn't seem to register it. I have refreshed several times and it is still stuck at four thumbs-up. Good work to oporim too, tried to thumbs up his/her comments as well...
The version of climate change that the media and the power structure want everyone to accept and unquestioned whole cloth just happens to be the one that will generate billions of new tax dollars. Think this is a coincidence?
and I quote: "evolution comprises all the stages of the development of the universe: the cosmic, biological, and human or cultural developments. Attemts to restrict the concept of evolution to biology are gratuitous." (now check out this circular reasoning) "life is a product of inorganic nature, and man is a product of the evolution of life"
it is a religion!why dont you admit it?
evolution is -an interpretation of the facts of science- without God
@TheSpliffSmoker Out of context or you just fail to recognize your own stupidity.You can have cosmic evolution but it's not the same as Darwinian evolution.
@TheSpliffSmoker Biological evolution is the change in populations over time but that is not what the word in general can mean.You're arguing semantics and making yourself sound even more irrelevant each post.The change in populations over time has nothing at all to do with the origin of the universe now go read a book.
There have been a gradual development - evolution in the car industry, but that does not say how it developed. It's reasonable to say there have been a evolution in life on Earth, based on observation on fossils, but how it happenned is a theory, because no one have ever observed a species been born.
@johnsenkenn that my friend is a result of conscious selection.
evolution (the religion) states that through this new organisims (& information) are produced because of it,but this has never & will never happen(ed)
There a born hundreds of million of living thing every day on Earth, but not one new species have popped up, not one have in the written history observed a new species been born, all changes is negative, and it's not livable.
So let me get this straight.... a reverend cannot be a reverend AND a scientist? Have you ever heard of Galileo,Einstein? They were both religious and both SCIENTISTS.
@mcap52 Don't forget Tesla. He contributed more to the world as a scientist than both of the ones you mentioned combined AND he was the first person that pointed out that we will find a connection between science and spirituality. That they would become partners not adversaries.
That CO2 tax money that SOME people think is going to go to help feed poor countries is going to come out of your pocket and go right into some banker's pocket on the Global Warming Carbon Credit Exchange in CHICAGO. Let's keep contributing to the problems and keep supporting these jerk-off bankers that know how to spend YOUR money and live YOUR life better than YOU do. People who support this dumbass theory are nothing but helpless morons waiting for the government to tell THEM what to do.
Why are they interviewing a reverend? Interview a real scientist who does not buy into the climate change hype, I know they're out there. That would truly legitimize the skepticism.
Additionally that is not to say that we should not concern ourselves with airquality, pollution ... Sure CO2 increases with the use of cars and oil, population changes. If this money was to go directly to cleaning the air.... But it's not, infact the money that is going into CO2 Taxation is going to help undeveloped countries become more developed feeding more into climate change.
Interesting that people who tend to blame climate change on human beings tend not to look at the increase in solar activity over the past decade, also the enivitablility that so sun itself is growing in size ever so slightly. Lets pretend the sun disapeered and we all froze over. No amount of carbon emissions is going to save our planet from becoming an icecube. Fact is that the sun itself is causing climate change.
@TheSpliffSmoker It doesn't invalidate his arguments but it lessens his credibility he already invalidated himself when he said that c02 has no effect on climate with absolutely zero solid evidence.
Anyway guys, this has been the most interesting conversation on youtube ever, perhaps because of the high % of brits taking part (let's all for one moment join together to laugh at the Americans, HAHAHAHAHAAAA, ahh I feel better now) but I'm getting fed up of typing in those captchas every few messages so... I bid you all goodnight :-)
The fact is that the majority of the world's people don't believe in Global Warming (Climate Change), they believe that it is a government scam to raise taxes.
Toxic pollution is the issue, not the "climate". All ot the toxins came from the earth, they will return and the Earth will be fine. The question is, can we, man, live with all of the toxins we produced by exploiting Earth for short sighted goals? My land must have CO2 or it and everything on it will die. The more CO2 the better the plants grow.
Why is an author/reverand being questioned on this issue? Does he have relevant education or experience in ths field of climate-science? I sure wouldn't ask a plumber for medical advice or a baker about engineering.
@Kartraith Agreed, it was a surprise to see a man of religion being interviewed and not a serious thinker in the field of study. However he at least raised some points of interest and at the end it was said by the interviewer he was an author of some sort in this area. Maybe more informed than the average MSM watcher
scientists try to single out an answer when there is a dualtiy how can you eliminate one truth to prove another without perceptual ignorance. the fact of the matter is fear has no individual purpose, it can only benefit others! heres scientists that say im right ur wrong (immature/juvenile) I believe in global warming but not a divine universal power that coordinates the manifestation of matter that their giant brains still cant do yet their opinion is law? do your own thinking!
killuminatiunited141 1 month ago
MIT climate scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen has observed that “Ordinary people see through man-made climate fears -- but educated people are very vulnerable.”
The idea that CO2, a trace essential gas in the atmosphere that humans exhale from their mouth, is the main climate driver is now being challenged by peer-reviewed studies, data and scientists from around the globe.
Don't worry the truth will come out eventually. Those warmists that have perptuated this hoax will be prosecuted.
FaceTheRealFacts 2 months ago
People have fallen for the climate change bullshit hook line and sinker and I was one of those people. I'm not anymore.
Too much evidence has shown that climate alarmists have lied repeatedly to prove their side of the argument and that they stand to earn a Lot of money, eg Al Gore.
The climate changes naturally. That is all. Carbon dioxide is the result of temperature chsnge not the other way round do why tax co2 production? Money money moneymoney money money......
yogbert 3 months ago
@yogbert Your basic argument is that you are gullible. Good point!
Trouble is, you now have a credibility problem.
Seems to me that you have fallen hook line & sinker for the seudo-science of the oil and coal industries. If the CO2 increase in the atmosphere was the result of temperature change, then the ocean level of CO2 should fall by a corresponding amount. Problem, is that it isn't. Ocean CO2 levels are rising making the oceans more acidic - say goodbye to coral reefs & shell fish.
RasPesher 3 months ago
I would like the money spent on CO2 be spent on fight against pollution witch is definitely man made to me.
fredlesson 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone who claims they ‘do not believe in’ anthropogenic global warming do so because they are ignorant of the science. Because really, what they are doing is claiming they understand the science better than around 83 scientific bodies from around the world that concur that it is occurring. What strange arrogance. Plus as anyone who understands what science is knows, science isn't about belief anyway, it doesn't require a leap of faith. It's about being accepting the overwhelming evidence.
alliebedazzla 10 months ago
What a waist of time inviewing that guy. He didn't have anything sensible to say. The Russians must be hard up for news items. When it comes to freedom, now that they have it, they don't know what to do with it.
RasPesher 11 months ago
@RasPesher We Russians knew what to do with freedom wisely unlike you westerners who are taking it for granted. Freedom allows us to gather intelligence information during peace time efficiently just as
Espionage is as important to gather intelligence information during war time. We have experiences wt lack of freedom that led to errors after errors but now it is a different Russia wt our observation of westerner's abuse and miss use of freedom.
darthvader5300 3 months ago
The irony is, the energy cartels have denied the world of clean energy, and then they are now lobbying the governments to place a carbon tax on the people for their polluting ancient outdated technologies which they have forced upon our planet anyway. AND they expect US to pay for that pollution! What a load of crap and garbage.
SovereignBeing 11 months ago
Gillard and Abbott and all political parties have been told by those that control the WORLD, that they must have a carbon tax. They will lose their jobs if they do not pass this carbon tax. This will be the first world tax put upon the people of earth.
The people will have to pay this tax, not industry, companies will just pass the debt by higher charges.
The earth has less carbon in the atmosphere than the past, so they LIE.
LIES will face the FEAR, when TRUTHS near.
AlienZoo1 11 months ago
@AlienZoo1
If you live in Sydney please come to rally on Saturday.
MsCivilwar 10 months ago
Interesting that UK people have to go on Former Communist Russia TV to have their say....who is being suppressed now??? Could it be the English??? Wonder why the BBC does not have fottage like this. I know the answer...
rcoones102 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dont worry people.keep buying petrol cars.Stop buying diesel,cause its pure evil. The fumes kill you and your kids slowly and you pretend you dont know why.Co2 is a colourless,tasteless,invisible gas and thats not what you see on the street,right? Look at the soot clouds in the cities-theres no such a thing as clean diesel, Mercedes from 1990 and 2010 pollute the same, but new filters make diesel particles even smaller and they go deeper into your lungs! Have a nice diesel-asthma-cancer death!
wneq 1 year ago
This reverend also doubts evolution.
underthebox 1 year ago
Yeah, the world has limitless resources and is an infinite trashcan. Damn those liberals for wanting fresher water to drink and fresher air to breathe. They are not looking out after us like those factory owners who make our cheap crap possible so we satisfy our empty lives with mindless consumption.
underthebox 1 year ago
@underthebox your name is a good indication of the type of moron you are, brainwashed and living under a box. praise those liberals for making up bs claims and imposing more taxes on a threat that doesnt exist, and screw those factory owners, who create jobs and drive our economy in order for ppl like you to prosper from an industrial society. maybe you'd be better off living in a bamboo hut in the middle of the jungle, that would be the ideal lifestyle for you left-wing fruitcakes
raza121 1 year ago
@raza121 Hey, I'm actually a neo-conservative here to spread models of civilization to ancient societies who know nothing about maintaining a sustainable environment. If there is anything that indigenous cultures can't teach us, is how to maintain a civilization for thousands of years. I agree! Screw the industry for creating and outsourcing jobs to other countries, exploiting third-world nations of their land and minerals, to drive a self-destructive economy. I'm with you, brother.
underthebox 1 year ago
@raza121 Bamboo hut in the middle of the jungle? Not bad. What's my other option? A 10 ft' apartment in the middle of a metropolis' sewage system with millions of people desperately trying to entertain the American dream?
underthebox 1 year ago
@playgrrrr gas extraction hydrofrakking........by the same folks who will be trading carbon credits.......how about we cease doin that instaed of dicking with climate nonsense?
it would have a beneficial impact, wouldnt you agree?why is that level of poinsoning allowed to produce another source of co2?
garnetfordsucks 1 year ago
Today every corporation can order a scientific study on any item and get the results according its wishes.
Time science was an honourable and credible profession has long passed.
envanje 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please google: "wikipedia list of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"
The supposed "unanimous consensus" is absolute bullshit. Water vapor is approximately 95-100x the greenhouse gas CO2 is. Temperatures have been increasing ever since the end of the Little Ice Age (again, google). There is massive disputes over the validity and accuracy of the "ice core data", and there are disputes over where ice is dec. and inc. at various locations around the world.
jimih64 1 year ago
Now tell me, how is 2400 politically appointed aparatchiks and chekists more important than 9029 independent PhDs?
oporim 1 year ago
There is no consensus you fucking asshole. All the climatologists who disagree with political agenda IPCC is forcing forward exited this UN body long ago. Quoting wiki or UN pages is not really stating facts. It's like asking nazi government if there are death camps up and running. You know what they will answer.
There is warming.
But there IS NO CONSENSUS ABOUT WHAT'S CAUSING IT.
Get this through your thick head. The only consensus that exists about AGW is POLITICAL, not scientific.
oporim 1 year ago
@oporim i sent you those links,disspelling your 30k scientists and i cut n pasted that quote youre a moron goodbye
narezul 1 year ago
@narezul Of which 3803 are from Atmosphere Earth & Environment science, 935 comp & math, 4818 chemists, 2964 bio/chem agriculture, 3046 medicine, 5810 aerospace, 10102 general engineering.
I shit on those "UN IPCC" politically appointed "experts" and what their opinion is.
thanks
oporim 1 year ago
@oporim sigh...willful ignorance. i can see now you didnt read those links i mailed you, derailing your current logic train. you can take a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. youre not interested in facts only in reinforcing what you think... youre a barely conscious monkey
leave me alone goodbye
narezul 1 year ago
@narezul Sure, I'll leave you alone alright. March along, behind your Al Gore fuehrer, you lemming you.
oporim 1 year ago
@oporim lmao troll nobody is this dumb
narezul 1 year ago
@oporim WTF?
"It's like asking nazi government if there are death camps up and running."
Are you seriously retarded? What idiotic nonesense are you spewing around?
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
Asian wives alone and try to chat her #lushfmlk.info#
alinasofials 1 year ago
3000 "scientists" support your theory. 30,000 scientists have spoken out against antropogenic global warming, but the corporate media ignores the side, who's still up for debate. Why?
Well, because as the prophet GOre said, "THE DEBATE IS OVER".
So it is for me. I'm set and ready. Question is, are you?
oporim 1 year ago
@oporim The controversy is significantly more pronounced in the popular media than in the scientific literature,[1] where there is a strong consensus that global surface temperatures have increased in recent decades and that the trend is caused mainly by human-induced emissions of greenhouse gases. No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view,[2][3] though a few organisations hold non-committal positions
narezul 1 year ago
@oporim quit miseducating people you idiot youre clearly the one who needs to do some reading i mean youre too stupid to even think c02 keeps the suns heat in you have some facts about ocean c02 but you dont understand the carbon cycle and you obviously dont read and your completely flipping the amount of scientist who believe it and dont your number are exactly opposite are you doing this on purpose or are you really so dumb
narezul 1 year ago
@narezul .
oporim 1 year ago
@oporim ROFL!
"3000 "scientists" support your theory. 30,000 scientists have spoken out against "
OMG you cannot even get realtions right..
What a ludicrous misrepresentation! You´re such a joke.
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
@0PsycoDad0 Yes, that is correct. You can visit official IPCC webpage and find there their claim, the last Assesment Report (4) was sent out to over 2400 "individual experts" and 193 member governments into fprmal review. You can find this in their AR4 PDF.
If you visit the NIPCC (org) webpage, that is a NONGOVERNMENTAL IPCC, you can find there 2009 report PDF with 31478 Americans with university degree in science (9029 PhDs) who claim the opposite.
oporim 1 year ago
@oporim LOL!
You whacko again.
Uh yeah maybe you should look up your "source" again cause a PhD in biblical literature doesn´t qualify you as a vaild source for climate.
Your imagined "overwhelimg" numbers is a myth perpetuated by dimtis, get it!
There is only ONE SCIENTIST, from alabama univ. me thinks, ALL the others are more or less horseshitpeddlers being hyped into "expert-status" by even dumber "experts".
You´re such a joke.
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please google: "wikipedia list of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"
The supposed "unanimous consensus" is absolute bullshit. Water vapor is approximately 95-100x the greenhouse gas CO2 is. Temperatures have been increasing ever since the end of the Little Ice Age (again, google). There is massive disputes over the validity and accuracy of the "ice core data", and there are disputes over where ice is dec. and inc. at various locations around the world.
jimih64 1 year ago
Taxation of CO2 releases (or all products connected to CO2 - most imporantly food and fuels) is a today's world genocide over poor. Luring farmers to produce stupid things like biodiesel makes food price go up significantly. Because of it people literaly die of starvation or are thrown into poverty. Paying tax on food will strike your wallet too.
So, enviro-genocidalists, when people die of hunger, mind it, it it's on your hands for supporting such lying corrupt system for no valid reason.
oporim 1 year ago
@narezul Oceans when they cool/warm - winter/summer, they suck up or release CO2, so it slightly fluctuates. This is just the surface water thats heating/cooling. In long term heating of the planet by Sun, deep waters heat up too and release much more CO2 and CH4, and that's what's important.
If oceans -by warming- relese 2% of stored CO2, we'll have double the ammount of CO2 in the air, while we're here fighting for 1% increase or less.
1000 years ago it was much warmer than today.
oporim 1 year ago
The unusual weather some countries are witnessing is due to the geo-engineering thats going on CHEMTRAILs and HAARP. the chemtrails are linked directly to SECO a huge multi-national corporation and the Rockafellers. HARRP is funded by the CFR and Bilderberg group, which are causing weather change to justify the carbon tax and its as simple as that.. There is a mountain of evidence and documented information on the net...The mainstream media including RT have a hidden agenda...
dangerousslave 1 year ago 2
"FACT: you dont need to be a scientist to know climate change is pseudo scientific propaganda,"
Jct: But it sure helps. Though the ultimate victory comes when I bet my alarmist friend to see who'd be right in 5 years and he backed down. The global warmist backed down from a simple bet to see who wins in 5 years. Har har har. When they won't bet, they must be really sure of their facts? Not.
kingofthepaupers 1 year ago
My friend has a shitload of arguments against me proving that climate change is true, hes a smart guy in a good university. I want to punch him in the face sometimes when he rambles on, even though I know he is wrong, I Dont do it. Can some smartass give me a couple of things which I can say are true without a doubt, that also prove the theory against climate change?
Papiforlife 1 year ago
@Papiforlife Point him towards the 'UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA E-MAILS'.
Google is your friend. Lol inturnet.
jammumu 1 year ago
@Papiforlife if the governments were worried about climate change there would be no wars. The war machine is not carbon free is it . so if im going to turn off lights etc to help save the planet why the fuck are they using bombs planes tanks and all the other shit that uses carbon coz they know its a fraud also why cut down trees when hemp is far better for the planet they are hypocrites of the worst kind
rockinrobinsuk 1 year ago 2
How many of the UK pension funds are invested in the schemes thought up because of climate change, what would happen to these if Climate Change is proved a HOAX ?
theonetrugod 1 year ago
One fact the liberal media left out... again, is that there is no data. East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU), destroyed it rather than let anyone see it.
mar1976cus 1 year ago
BREAKING NEWS! The proof is out the earth has been freezing and Thawing for millions of years!
sealhunter5 1 year ago
The climate is not meant to be stagnant. That's why life is adaptive.
Carbon is not a poison. We are carbon based!
JaysThoughts 1 year ago 2
WHahahahah, PAY MOENY YOU SHEEPS YOU WILL FILL our pockets :D. thats funny. thats just wrong
Gecataaa94 1 year ago
Years ago I assured myself that these greedy, criminals will never be able to charge us for the air we breath. Boy was I wrong.
chegvra 1 year ago
Vulkanske promjene i ostale promjene na zemlji svakako da mijenaju klimu
zato i ekoloske naknade treba i povecati pogotovo za evakuaciju stanovnistva
domacindomace 1 year ago
@domacindomace
In answer to your first statement:
Volcanic activity is neither man made nor possible for us to control - that would be like trying to change Earth's orbit around the sun which, let's face it, is the real driving force behind all the climate change in our planet's history over billions of years.
As to your second statement:
Do you mean the "evacuation" of the population, as you say, or the green Agenda 21 elimination of the population?
SpideyVids 1 year ago
Who is the scientist everyone's referring to here?!
sgabriel 1 year ago
Love all the catastrophic video footage while the man was talking. Of course, everyone knows there were no floods, droughts, heat waves and blizzards BEFORE mankind's wanton carbon emissions. Right? There's only been floods, droughts and heatwaves SINCE the industrial age, right? Because if there actually HAD BEEN records of floods, droughts, blizzards, scorching heat, etc., well that would prove that ANIMALS had industry and THEY'RE also to blame. Right? Or maybe it was dinosaur farts?
jacobyte100 1 year ago
I'm not sure if I should give 5 stars for the brilliant scientist or 1 star for the RT host and his propaganda!
ibislee 1 year ago
Thanks RT for letting the real scientists speak. However this host plays "the devil's advocate" a bit to zealously.
moustiq77 1 year ago 3
Global Warming, Climate Change, & now Climate Disturbance is the new lie emerging
UnblockedOne 1 year ago 2
@UnblockedOne
Get ready for their next attempt to repackage the same old climate change scam as a threat to biodiversity and notice how their tame media are already shoving it down our throats with scare stories of species extinction. Extinction of species has happened all through our planet's lifetime - it happened before humans arrived on the scene and it will still happen long after we are gone.
SpideyVids 1 year ago
HAARProjectz
9eazemaker 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SUN SHIFT NORTH DUMB RT, lol, WOBBLING EARTH.
napzman76 1 year ago
Slavery is what this is about. Take nothing your enemy offers you, they are still smarting from the French revolution, which obviously stopped too soon, and in too small an area. The aristocracy seemingly never learns.
dhuntor 1 year ago
great questions with good answers
Realjhad 1 year ago
Holy smokes, this reverend himself says he's not an expert. Nice job RT, you've made fools out of yourselves on fools day
Spravvl 1 year ago
hmm ok ask a reverent?
jystyle 1 year ago
FACT: Carbon Dioxide has nothing to do with the climate,
FACT: Carbon Emissions rises after the climate rise
FACT: IPCC is a joke, Full of un-qualified bureaucrats one of them being the chairman, Chaudry, an engineer by trade, who has no qualification whatsover for that particular position.
FACT: Al gore's alarmist hit piece the inconvenient truth is full of errors, from start to finish.
FACT: you dont need to be a scientist to know climate change is pseudo scientific propaganda,
dellbalboa 1 year ago
@dellbalboa LOL!
Fact: you´re a scientific illiterate
Fact: you´re ruminating feed crap
Fact: you post only emotional crap without any reference
0PsycoDad0 1 year ago
Ask the priest about science. Next up we'll ask Stephen Hawkins about the garden of Eden... and the mythical... ahem I mean historical snake with the ability to speak and deceive. It all comes down to the dollar, and how much of it you can grab before your time runs out.
kharnvelzyghur 1 year ago
Maybe this reverent should stick a hose from his hummer inside and roll up the windows run the motor till his tiny braincells get the proof necessary!
akulabite 1 year ago
@akulabite He's actually a paid public relations personnel for the oil industry.
underthebox 1 year ago
@underthebox I noticed something was going on. Pfff RT wants to turn some news into entertainment its a slippery slope tho. First they are non bias and before you know it they become FOX NEWS :))
akulabite 1 year ago
WTF? ASK A REVERENT About Science! GOOD ONE RT!
akulabite 1 year ago
@akulabite It could be worse though couldnt it, like believing a billionaire yank who talks bollocks.
no1froggy 1 year ago
@no1froggy Not quite. A billionaire is a part of the elite. But a Reverent just comes to show how desperate the billionaires have become. Seriously its stupid statements like these that makes religion look more loony that it already is.
akulabite 1 year ago
@akulabite But it o,k to use washed up celebrities apparently to promote this climate shite,im confused as to which religion are you reffering to?, is it the green religion by any chance?, & im an athiest but id rather listen to this guy rather than Al Gore & other con artists of his ilk, the reverend is certainly more trustworthy than these sort of people as he has morals.
no1froggy 1 year ago
@no1froggy He doesn't believe in science! And as atheist you should know better. How can you agree with someone who believes in a talking snake in regards to the effects of carbon monoxide on the upper atmosphere.. Common man don't insult your intelligence.
I agree on the washed up celebrities , i don't like to listen to them either but if they are telling telling the truth , which is backed up by facts (the scientific method) then I would have to agree with them. do you agree?
akulabite 1 year ago
@akulabite Anyone with half a brain knows that washed up celebs will go along with anything to get in the public eye so no i certainly wouldnt agree with them, & if you believe in the scientific method, which is basically a computer being told what to come up with then thats your choice, although by quoting "carbon monoxide" you are proving your ignorance, as i certainly didnt hear the reverend mention it, & as he collates his information from Piers Corbyn he is hardly anti science is he?.
no1froggy 1 year ago
@no1froggy "scientific method, which is basically a computer being told what to come up" Im speechless.... That COMPUTER put a human being on the FUCKING MOON. That computer made it so when you catch the SWINE FLU you don't pray to JESUS but you TAKE THE ANTIBIOTIC... How could you be so Intolerant when the fruits of Science have given the human species twice the life span along with countless other achievement. Thanks TO THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD! Still hate Science? MOVE TO THE MIDDLE EAST!
akulabite 1 year ago
@akulabite That computer did not put a human being on the moon unless you are saying micro processors were around then, you just sum up the sort of people who try to be intelligent then come out with total crap, the scientists that develop drugs are not climate scientists, youll also find that in the middle east they use pharmacuticals so what in the hell are you babbling on about?,you just come across as a total fruitcake who aint got a clue what you preach.
no1froggy 1 year ago
@no1froggy Again you prove nothing more than your stupidity--> On board the Apollo
Lunar module there was a 16-bit || 4.077MHz computer. --> The example with the pharmaceuticals was not a comparison but an EXAMPLE of the scientific method applied. Just in case you forget what we are discussing here -> Its the SCIENTIFIC METHOD <-- So tell me Im wrong again OR use the scientific method to gather the facts and come up with a conclusion... thank you.
akulabite 1 year ago
ooh look a 'reverend'... he MUST be an 'expert in the most complex 'science' on this Planet!! Pah!! These fools make themselves look more & more daft repeating the same old fosil fuel funded memes over & over till some poor sop actually believes they understand the 'science' (which of course they DON'T... except a few snippets of cherry picked data which they take out of context & claim is 'proof' its all a conspiracy.. & even the walruses are in on it).
Climate denier fools all of them!
ejbh3160 1 year ago
CITIZENS OF AMERICA!
DO NOT FART!
THEY MAY TAX YOU FOR THAT !
;P
themosthandsomedude 1 year ago
"Modern industrial civilization has developed within a certain system of convenient myths. The driving force of modern industrial civilization has been individual material gain... Now it's long been understood - very well - that a society that is based on this principle will destroy itself in time. It can only persist - with whatever suffering and injustice it entails - as long as it's possible to pretend that the destructive forces...
underthebox 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Modern industrial civilization has developed within a certain system of convenient myths. The driving force of modern industrial civilization has been individual material gain... Now it's long been understood - very well - that a society that is based on this principle will destroy itself in time. It can only persist - with whatever suffering and injustice it entails - as long as it's possible to pretend that the destructive forces...
underthebox 1 year ago
showing clips of ice melting during summer time proves global warming
666cobra999 1 year ago
..that humans create are limited, that the world is an infinite resource, and that the world is an infinite garbage can. At this stage of history either... the general population will take control of its own destiny and will concern itself with community issues guided by values of solidarity, and sympathy, and concern for others, or - alternatively - there will be no destiny for anyone to control." -Noam Chomsky
underthebox 1 year ago
Well Done RT!!...
chudnovsky 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter The IPCC emails have been proven by independant investigations to be personal comments, and not falsification of data - FIVE TIMES OVER.
Kartraith 1 year ago
@Kartraith They were not independant investigations, research who investigated it and you will see for yourself.
chudnovsky 1 year ago
since evil humans breathe out CO2, the world leaders must impose breathing tax to make sure evil humans pay for pollution. If you cannot pay the breathing tax, your throat will be slit.
sinitskyd 1 year ago
THE SUN SHIFT NORTH DUM RT, lol, WOBBLING EARTH.
napzman76 1 year ago
THE SUN SHIFT NORTH DUM RT, lol
napzman76 1 year ago
Glad i'm happy i can think for myself. i like the BBC twist at the end; pensions. Very typical, don't bite the hand that feeds you forever.
justgetsome 1 year ago
Scientists know that religions' willful refusal to accept the understanding and research of human's destructive impact on the Earth's ecological system hinders the search of sustainable solutions. If a train is coming at me, I would ask the scientist how much time I got to move out of the way and in which direction, rather than seek the reverend's non-observable, non-empirical, and non-measurable response, "Let God decide." Let's leave these irreverent religious institutions aside.
underthebox 1 year ago
China has America right where they want us. What do you think if China has some type of security product protecting them from a dollar collapse. If they pull the plug they could win out big on the back end... America we need to produce again! Grow not just a technocrat green growth, but a grassroots return to American products paid for by banks to support American lives and trades. End the wars, end the fed, and end the cycle of money manipulation by corrupt Wall Street terrorists!!!!
ghostfacekhila 1 year ago
The biggest CO2 producer USA's former candidate of presidency Al Gore whos surrounded by good friends own the oil companies endustrial tycoons making a movie about climate change claiming to warn the civilisation of the world against the global warming threat?It doesnt make sense at all to me.And yet the movie wins the best movie oscar.Its unpresedented for a movie in the documentary format to win an award like that.That doesnt make sense either.Where i am from its called black propaganda.
musiciankara 1 year ago
So this guy manages to believe in god, despite zero evidence for god, but doesn't believe in anthropogenic global warming, despite all the evidence supporting it? I know RT likes to be skeptic about things, but climate change has massive scientific evidence for it, and RT should consider also interviewing some real scientists.
ummonk 1 year ago
Carbon and taxes and cap and trade will destroy industrial society and the middle class as we know them if they are passed. Also notice it puts all sorts of regulations on the US and not India or China which are both known to be huge polluters and environmental.
PATTONM14A1 1 year ago
@PATTONM14A1 Actually, it's peak in global oil production and the subsequent decline in the availability of cheap fossil fuels that will destroy industrial society. I wouldn't worry about our fall from grace being mitigated by a carbon tax though... Industry is responsible for at least two thirds of emissions. And, as we all know, the corporations call the shots in the US.
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago
@PeakOilCountdown There's no peak oil. That's a load of crap.
syyenergy7 1 year ago
@syyenergy7 lol yes no peak oil , lol thats why america had to invade afghanistan and irak lol oh god give some brain
GonG108 1 year ago
@syyenergy7 That's what the Americans said about their own oil peak in 1970. Time will tell.
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago
@syyenergy7 Of course there's peak oil what a silly thing to say. There's still plenty of oil left, but it's becoming more and more in places that are harder to get to, by the simple fact that we go for the oil that's easiest to get first! And there will still be plenty of oil left when it begins taking as much energy to extract the oil as the oil itself provides. How much oil is left is simply not a good measurement of how much oil we have available to us.
annoloki 1 year ago
@annoloki There would be "peak air" long before "peak oil'. The US has easily accessible oil in excess of several times the Middle-East. Insects exist to be scammed and used. You repeat the b.s. lines they feed people.
syyenergy7 1 year ago
governments already get too much tax and they improve nothing,most of what I see is getting worse except their lifestyles.
faniboz1 1 year ago
Boo RT... This gentleman is one of the 3 people in the world that still doesn't believe in anthropomorphic climate change. ...Way to support your owners' corporate interests in spite of the facts -- while, I would add, criticizing America for doing the same. ...By the way, I have no doubt that this REVEREND deserves my trust where matters of science are concerned!
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PeakOilCountdown where is your proof? re man made climate change?
rowleyparks 1 year ago
@PeakOilCountdown I think if you do a little real research instead of buying the mainstream media's brainwashing you will find that the IPCC is actually in the minority among scientists who do real study, as opposed to computer modelling.
pretorious700 1 year ago
@pretorious700 I think melting polar ice caps, rising ocean acidity, and decades'long ice core research trumps your shiny new talking point about computer modelling. Good try though.
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago
Comment removed
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago
Comment removed
PeakOilCountdown 1 year ago
I like this guy. Simple and straightforward, yet lefties still don't get it.
EricShermansChannel 1 year ago
i support nuclear fusion
12valvepower1 1 year ago
man i cant believe we let them tax carbon... something we exhale something plants need to grow... how fucking retarded are we to let them tax something that comes out of our lungs...
mattman696 1 year ago 54
It's taxing air!
Finally!
Mad genius at work!!
Tressco 1 year ago
@mattman696 Suck a tailpipe and let me know how natural that feels.
underthebox 1 year ago
@mattman696 Hey, just to let you know that I have tried to thumbs-up your comment several times, but youtube doesn't seem to register it. I have refreshed several times and it is still stuck at four thumbs-up. Good work to oporim too, tried to thumbs up his/her comments as well...
8n4n08 1 year ago
amen to wasteful tax dollars on fake science
Ken2234 1 year ago
The version of climate change that the media and the power structure want everyone to accept and unquestioned whole cloth just happens to be the one that will generate billions of new tax dollars. Think this is a coincidence?
pretorious700 1 year ago
@CommonSensePeter Blood&Gore, you couldnt make this stuff up lol
ibram786 1 year ago
and I quote: "evolution comprises all the stages of the development of the universe: the cosmic, biological, and human or cultural developments. Attemts to restrict the concept of evolution to biology are gratuitous." (now check out this circular reasoning) "life is a product of inorganic nature, and man is a product of the evolution of life"
it is a religion!why dont you admit it?
evolution is -an interpretation of the facts of science- without God
creation is --------------------- with God
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@TheSpliffSmoker Out of context or you just fail to recognize your own stupidity.You can have cosmic evolution but it's not the same as Darwinian evolution.
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy they go hand in hand my friend.
try to explain one withouth the other (logically & scientfically)
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@TheSpliffSmoker Biological evolution is the change in populations over time but that is not what the word in general can mean.You're arguing semantics and making yourself sound even more irrelevant each post.The change in populations over time has nothing at all to do with the origin of the universe now go read a book.
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy
What does the word evolution in general means ?.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn The gradual development of something
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy
evolution: a process in which something passes by degrees to a different stage (especially a more advanced or mature stage)
hence the big bang (& the results thereof) is a form of evolution
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@TheSpliffSmoker has nothing to do with biological evolution tho
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy no,but it IS evolution itself
do you see now how they are inseperable?
(its also circular reasoning,
ie this developed this way because that developed that way & vice versa)
Its a belief.
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy
There have been a gradual development - evolution in the car industry, but that does not say how it developed. It's reasonable to say there have been a evolution in life on Earth, based on observation on fossils, but how it happenned is a theory, because no one have ever observed a species been born.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn See the problem is you're using words improperly.
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy
Could you be more specific.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn that my friend is a result of conscious selection.
evolution (the religion) states that through this new organisims (& information) are produced because of it,but this has never & will never happen(ed)
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@TheSpliffSmoker
There a born hundreds of million of living thing every day on Earth, but not one new species have popped up, not one have in the written history observed a new species been born, all changes is negative, and it's not livable.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn i agree.
now thats a scientific observation!
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@johnsenkenn incorrect I've already pointed out the Lenski experiment.
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy
A coli experiment in a lab, man I didn't know you believed in creation.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
@thatlogicalguy anyways nice talkin to ya dude,send me a msg if ya wanna continue this convo another time.Im off to play monday night combat ;)
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
So let me get this straight.... a reverend cannot be a reverend AND a scientist? Have you ever heard of Galileo,Einstein? They were both religious and both SCIENTISTS.
IMAGINE THAT
mcap52 1 year ago
@mcap52 Don't forget Tesla. He contributed more to the world as a scientist than both of the ones you mentioned combined AND he was the first person that pointed out that we will find a connection between science and spirituality. That they would become partners not adversaries.
crackerwv 1 year ago
That CO2 tax money that SOME people think is going to go to help feed poor countries is going to come out of your pocket and go right into some banker's pocket on the Global Warming Carbon Credit Exchange in CHICAGO. Let's keep contributing to the problems and keep supporting these jerk-off bankers that know how to spend YOUR money and live YOUR life better than YOU do. People who support this dumbass theory are nothing but helpless morons waiting for the government to tell THEM what to do.
crackerwv 1 year ago
Why are they interviewing a reverend? Interview a real scientist who does not buy into the climate change hype, I know they're out there. That would truly legitimize the skepticism.
VegitoVai90 1 year ago
@VegitoVai90 You can't be a reverend and a scientist?
1333fuller 1 year ago
Additionally that is not to say that we should not concern ourselves with airquality, pollution ... Sure CO2 increases with the use of cars and oil, population changes. If this money was to go directly to cleaning the air.... But it's not, infact the money that is going into CO2 Taxation is going to help undeveloped countries become more developed feeding more into climate change.
exo232 1 year ago
ALL
Scientific
THEORY
is
GARBAGE.
Until proven right. Manmade global warming with remain garbage for infinity.
crackerwv 1 year ago
@crackerwv WILL remain garbage...brain fart. Oops...did that brainfart contribute to global warming? Just a theory....
crackerwv 1 year ago
Interesting that people who tend to blame climate change on human beings tend not to look at the increase in solar activity over the past decade, also the enivitablility that so sun itself is growing in size ever so slightly. Lets pretend the sun disapeered and we all froze over. No amount of carbon emissions is going to save our planet from becoming an icecube. Fact is that the sun itself is causing climate change.
exo232 1 year ago
@exo232 Good point
ibram786 1 year ago
Yes it's been really quite good fun ;) nn
ibram786 1 year ago
Wait, did he say "reverend Philip Foster"? There's no way he's a reverend... If so, can't take him seriously.
rangedkid 1 year ago
@rangedkid thats like saying "this racecar driver shouldnt know how to build a shelf cause he only knows how to drive cars"
TheSpliffSmoker 1 year ago
@TheSpliffSmoker It doesn't invalidate his arguments but it lessens his credibility he already invalidated himself when he said that c02 has no effect on climate with absolutely zero solid evidence.
thatlogicalguy 1 year ago
Anyway guys, this has been the most interesting conversation on youtube ever, perhaps because of the high % of brits taking part (let's all for one moment join together to laugh at the Americans, HAHAHAHAHAAAA, ahh I feel better now) but I'm getting fed up of typing in those captchas every few messages so... I bid you all goodnight :-)
annoloki 1 year ago
this guy is great! science doesnt work on consensus. it works on skepticism.
JFAINTER88 1 year ago
@JFAINTER88 Very true.
ibram786 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fact is that the majority of the world's people don't believe in Global Warming (Climate Change), they believe that it is a government scam to raise taxes.
rayme4raw 1 year ago 2
"Global warming" is a load of my swiss roll!
87solarsky 1 year ago
The global warmist don't control RT!
VexZeez 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Global warming is a joke.
VexZeez 1 year ago
drill baby drill...
ThisBoyTV 1 year ago
Toxic pollution is the issue, not the "climate". All ot the toxins came from the earth, they will return and the Earth will be fine. The question is, can we, man, live with all of the toxins we produced by exploiting Earth for short sighted goals? My land must have CO2 or it and everything on it will die. The more CO2 the better the plants grow.
motorolarules 1 year ago
Google search for "global warming doomsday called off"
Yourebuying 1 year ago
Why is an author/reverand being questioned on this issue? Does he have relevant education or experience in ths field of climate-science? I sure wouldn't ask a plumber for medical advice or a baker about engineering.
Kartraith 1 year ago
@Kartraith Too fucking true. Every time they bring one of their "experts" it's usually some moron with no relevant expertise.
hippydude89 1 year ago
@Kartraith Agreed, it was a surprise to see a man of religion being interviewed and not a serious thinker in the field of study. However he at least raised some points of interest and at the end it was said by the interviewer he was an author of some sort in this area. Maybe more informed than the average MSM watcher
ibram786 1 year ago
lol they just want to tax us for breathing
1x93cm 1 year ago