Its no warming if you count the largest spike in temperatures ever, which was in 1998 because of a massive el nino that year so to start with that year is classic cherry picking. When you smooth out the data, it still shows increasing warming. Why start from 1998, why not pick any year. The reason deniers pick that year is because it supports there conclusion. Climate changes are 30 trends, not 15. Its basic statistics.
Lord Monckton "This thing this has been overblown". Abosolutely Lord Monckton, 15 years with no warming, all the climate models have been wrong, debunked glacier claims, wire fraud and suppression of data, this scam is debunked.
Lord Monckton is a compulsive liar and not a source anyone should take seriously. Avoid this con-man because it will only hurt your message in the future if you side with him. There are many people on both sides that we should listen to but not people like him or Al Gore who have their own agendas.
Anyone that throws their hats in with pathological politicians like those two are asking to be manipulated.
@Dodger481 I already know how real science works. Lord monckton is a known liar and con man. He lied about being a peer in the house of lords, he said that people with HIV should be removed from general population, he is advancing his cure-all for cancer which is bullshit, he said scientist should have a religion(preferably Christian) before they are allowed to do science. He also has lied about being peer-reviewed.
The problem with heredity peers is that they are so inbred that they have lost their marbles. You only have to look at him for a few moments to see that he is completely mad.
@raderator Its interesting to see that America is just as racist as it was two hundred years ago. You can pass all the fancy laws you like but its like putting lipstick on a hog.
It's all political. Have you studied United Nations Agenda 21 and how it's being implemented in the US? Search YouTube for "How your community is implementing AGENDA 21" The lady with long, white hair is a liberal speaking to a conservative group.
Thanks Rynso, check out youtube.com/all_comments?v=KTjaMxuAhUw&email=comment_reply_received and you will see why. The evil doers put short clips out which do not deal with the full explanation and it needs to be dealt with by lodging alongside them the full detailed answer.
By the way congratulations on an awesome interview and the filming.
Agreed Brilliant! I have also been told the interview was done in one take with no notes which is quite incredible!,
I have had the pleasure of meeting the man. those who debunk him clearly haven't or are intent on evil. They take little chunks to debunk him and never show the full explanation. Sadly the gullible will soak it in. I am requesting you to break up the video so each salient point is addressed and then may be used to reply to the malicious ones
On 7/28/11, it was revealed that the scientist behind the polar-bears-are-in-trouble research is being investigated for “scientific misconduct”. Then, a new study of NASA data revealed that the earth is actually allowing more heat to escape the planet than previously thought by the climate change community. During a speech at the Aspen Institute in Colorado, Al Gore launched into a vulgar tirade while accusing skeptics of media manipulation.
@tangowahine Sounds like your comment describes/illustrates one effect of the type of education LCM bewails at the end of the interview! I've had a number say it is brilliant...
Released Yesterday yet another report confirming Monktons Views - watch Salby C02 No doubt it will be discounted by those who are making money out of climate change
@shreddakj His series is good, but don't forget who he writes for. In the end we might all just get fed up of the Left and just ignore anything to do with the environment. The only two arguing sensibly are potholer and Monckton, I believe Monckton has a few things to correct but that he will be proven right.
@fleemonstay "I believe Monckton has a few things to correct" In Potholer54 series debunking Monckton's crap he pointed out 21 errors made by Monckton. That sounds like more than a few to me. Isn't it curious how Monckton has never published any peer-reviewed articles on climate science.
@Stillwater900 And all this time I thought science was about theory, research, evidence etc when its actually about wiping the floor with 'us people' in debates. Remember, science is about peer reviewed scientific studies, not who you think is the best speaker in a debate.
@Richard482 When all that theory is based on flawed science, its not science. They removed all the data from cold places and left the hot places in. So, you didn't answer, why does he wipe the floor with the climate change people if his science is bad?
@Stillwater900 Why do you think the anthropogenic climate change theory is based on flawed science? We know certain gases in our atmosphere stop some of the infrared or heat radiation we receive from the sun escaping back into space. More of these gases and the world warms up, less and it cools. It simply physics and was first realised over 180 years ago. Did you watch the link I posted? After watching Potholer54 series do you still think his science is accurate.
@Richard482 I've already seen his entire critique on Moncton and like I said there are a few issues to address. But don't get too carried away, don't forget that guy bats for The Guardian, so his view are skewered, he's just as convincing as Moncton, I bet you never checked his sources either.
In the end Australia will choose a new PM who will rubber the Carbon Tax, the EU will fall and whether or not Climate Change is man made or not we'll all just be fed up so much and won't care.
@fleemonstay All Potholer54 does is report what the peer-reviewed scientific literature says. Its easy to check his souces as he lists them all. On the other hand Monckton misrepresents the scientists and misreports the scientific papers he uses.
@Richard482 I'll be honest, I can't be bothered to sit through a six parter like I did with Potholer54, does that make me a hypocrite? Well, not really because I've listened to both sides over the years. Like I said we're all going to get fed up with the science and as the EU falls gravitate away from it, it's really just the EU keeping this theory alive.
Look, I checked the BBC's Weather website two fucking days ago, it said Saturday would beam with sun, now it says it's cloudy, well go figure
@fleemonstay: Yeah, it makes you a hypocrite. :) If you can't even be bothered to sit through a six parter that transparently takes this frauster apart and and maybe even read the papers yourself you are obviously no that interested in facts.
@Marekiify I saw what Potholer54 had to say cunt, one set was twelve parts and Monckton's was five, so I fucking know what they're going to say.
Personally I think Monckton can beat this bag of shite nonsense, I am convinced by not just he, but other scientists that the whole thing is a socialists scam!
Monckton is an asshat
Oddessuss 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"15 years with no warming"
Its no warming if you count the largest spike in temperatures ever, which was in 1998 because of a massive el nino that year so to start with that year is classic cherry picking. When you smooth out the data, it still shows increasing warming. Why start from 1998, why not pick any year. The reason deniers pick that year is because it supports there conclusion. Climate changes are 30 trends, not 15. Its basic statistics.
thesparitan 2 weeks ago
Lord Monckton "This thing this has been overblown". Abosolutely Lord Monckton, 15 years with no warming, all the climate models have been wrong, debunked glacier claims, wire fraud and suppression of data, this scam is debunked.
Dodger481 2 weeks ago
Ahh.. the good lord Monckton one of the only honest voices in the cliamte change deabte.
Dodger481 2 weeks ago
Lord Monckton is a compulsive liar and not a source anyone should take seriously. Avoid this con-man because it will only hurt your message in the future if you side with him. There are many people on both sides that we should listen to but not people like him or Al Gore who have their own agendas.
Anyone that throws their hats in with pathological politicians like those two are asking to be manipulated.
thesparitan 2 weeks ago
@thesparitan
Watch the video and learn how real science operates.
Dodger481 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Dodger481 I already know how real science works. Lord monckton is a known liar and con man. He lied about being a peer in the house of lords, he said that people with HIV should be removed from general population, he is advancing his cure-all for cancer which is bullshit, he said scientist should have a religion(preferably Christian) before they are allowed to do science. He also has lied about being peer-reviewed.
He isn't even a scientist. So no thanks
thesparitan 2 weeks ago
The problem with heredity peers is that they are so inbred that they have lost their marbles. You only have to look at him for a few moments to see that he is completely mad.
TheSailer99 3 months ago
@TheSailer99 By looking at Obama you can see that he is an ape.
raderator 2 months ago
@raderator Its interesting to see that America is just as racist as it was two hundred years ago. You can pass all the fancy laws you like but its like putting lipstick on a hog.
TheSailer99 2 months ago
So when it's Arctic conditions in Britain this winter AGAIN, are the greenies going to blame it on global warming?
Cooling is warming, warming is warming, wetter is warming, drier is warming, windier is warming. Well at least they have all their bases covered.
Greenies have Downs Syndrome. And that's a fact. I blame global warming.
Ever feel like you're Alice in Wonderland? I do every day, because I'm surrounded by liberal mentalist fucktards.
Lightf00t1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Right, so global warming is just a conspiracy of the left radicals!?
misium 3 months ago
Comment removed
misium 3 months ago
He will appear much more serious if you cover the left part of the screen.
misium 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA , CSIRO and the US Navys CHIEF Oceanographers + 97 % of the worlds climate scientists....
Or this guy.
someghosts 4 months ago
Monckton's an embarrassment to humanity.
dimefeet 4 months ago
Lord Christopher Monckton is a total liar. FACT.
remcovanek2 4 months ago
I hope that someday I can learn to be even a fraction as articulate and eloquent as Lord Monckton. He's the proverbial "proper Birt" too, isn't he?
Stillwater900 6 months ago
Gosh, he is a HECK of a speaker, what a skilled debator
Stillwater900 6 months ago
What an interesting man.
I thought 57 minutes would be too long; I was wrong: it's not long enough!
1948Gregoire 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's all political. Have you studied United Nations Agenda 21 and how it's being implemented in the US? Search YouTube for "How your community is implementing AGENDA 21" The lady with long, white hair is a liberal speaking to a conservative group.
vechorik 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks Rynso, check out youtube.com/all_comments?v=KTjaMxuAhUw&email=comment_reply_received and you will see why. The evil doers put short clips out which do not deal with the full explanation and it needs to be dealt with by lodging alongside them the full detailed answer.
By the way congratulations on an awesome interview and the filming.
tangowahine 7 months ago
Agreed Brilliant! I have also been told the interview was done in one take with no notes which is quite incredible!,
I have had the pleasure of meeting the man. those who debunk him clearly haven't or are intent on evil. They take little chunks to debunk him and never show the full explanation. Sadly the gullible will soak it in. I am requesting you to break up the video so each salient point is addressed and then may be used to reply to the malicious ones
tangowahine 7 months ago
@tangowahine You're correct. The interview was done in one take (without notes) and was not edited. It is exactly as filmed.
I'll consider your suggestion. Thanks.
rynso 7 months ago
On 7/28/11, it was revealed that the scientist behind the polar-bears-are-in-trouble research is being investigated for “scientific misconduct”. Then, a new study of NASA data revealed that the earth is actually allowing more heat to escape the planet than previously thought by the climate change community. During a speech at the Aspen Institute in Colorado, Al Gore launched into a vulgar tirade while accusing skeptics of media manipulation.
vechorik 7 months ago
Hi Rynso,
Please chunk it into short explanatory vids this is too much info for little brains!
Thanks
tangowahine 7 months ago
@tangowahine Sounds like your comment describes/illustrates one effect of the type of education LCM bewails at the end of the interview! I've had a number say it is brilliant...
rynso 7 months ago
Released Yesterday yet another report confirming Monktons Views - watch Salby C02 No doubt it will be discounted by those who are making money out of climate change
tangowahine 7 months ago
Hey rynso, you should really take a look at the Monckton Bunkum series of videos by potholer54 here on Youtube.
shreddakj 7 months ago 2
@shreddakj His series is good, but don't forget who he writes for. In the end we might all just get fed up of the Left and just ignore anything to do with the environment. The only two arguing sensibly are potholer and Monckton, I believe Monckton has a few things to correct but that he will be proven right.
Take from that what you will.
fleemonstay 6 months ago
@fleemonstay "I believe Monckton has a few things to correct" In Potholer54 series debunking Monckton's crap he pointed out 21 errors made by Monckton. That sounds like more than a few to me. Isn't it curious how Monckton has never published any peer-reviewed articles on climate science.
watch?v=mdQp-PisrBY
Richard482 6 months ago
@Richard482 Isn't it curious how he always wipes the floor with you people in debates?
Stillwater900 6 months ago
@Stillwater900 And all this time I thought science was about theory, research, evidence etc when its actually about wiping the floor with 'us people' in debates. Remember, science is about peer reviewed scientific studies, not who you think is the best speaker in a debate.
watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=channel_video_title
Richard482 6 months ago
@Richard482 When all that theory is based on flawed science, its not science. They removed all the data from cold places and left the hot places in. So, you didn't answer, why does he wipe the floor with the climate change people if his science is bad?
Stillwater900 6 months ago
@Stillwater900 Why do you think the anthropogenic climate change theory is based on flawed science? We know certain gases in our atmosphere stop some of the infrared or heat radiation we receive from the sun escaping back into space. More of these gases and the world warms up, less and it cools. It simply physics and was first realised over 180 years ago. Did you watch the link I posted? After watching Potholer54 series do you still think his science is accurate.
watch?v=SjhNVSZmLF4
Richard482 6 months ago
@Stillwater900 And while your at it watch this one which includes the very scientists that Monckton bases some of his claims on.
watch?v=rizvaJyA-GM
Richard482 6 months ago
@Richard482 I've already seen his entire critique on Moncton and like I said there are a few issues to address. But don't get too carried away, don't forget that guy bats for The Guardian, so his view are skewered, he's just as convincing as Moncton, I bet you never checked his sources either.
In the end Australia will choose a new PM who will rubber the Carbon Tax, the EU will fall and whether or not Climate Change is man made or not we'll all just be fed up so much and won't care.
fleemonstay 6 months ago
@fleemonstay All Potholer54 does is report what the peer-reviewed scientific literature says. Its easy to check his souces as he lists them all. On the other hand Monckton misrepresents the scientists and misreports the scientific papers he uses.
watch?v=rizvaJyA-GM
Here's the first in another good series
watch?v=SjhNVSZmLF4
Richard482 6 months ago
@Richard482 I'll be honest, I can't be bothered to sit through a six parter like I did with Potholer54, does that make me a hypocrite? Well, not really because I've listened to both sides over the years. Like I said we're all going to get fed up with the science and as the EU falls gravitate away from it, it's really just the EU keeping this theory alive.
Look, I checked the BBC's Weather website two fucking days ago, it said Saturday would beam with sun, now it says it's cloudy, well go figure
fleemonstay 6 months ago
@fleemonstay: Yeah, it makes you a hypocrite. :) If you can't even be bothered to sit through a six parter that transparently takes this frauster apart and and maybe even read the papers yourself you are obviously no that interested in facts.
Marekiify 3 months ago
@Marekiify I saw what Potholer54 had to say cunt, one set was twelve parts and Monckton's was five, so I fucking know what they're going to say.
Personally I think Monckton can beat this bag of shite nonsense, I am convinced by not just he, but other scientists that the whole thing is a socialists scam!
fleemonstay 3 months ago