as long as a bail enforcement agent goes to the sheriff's office in the county he's in and tells them what he's doing, he does not have to have a warrant. A prisoner is owned by a bail bondsman until he or she has gone to court. so what i'm trying to say is when you pay that 10% you have freedom from jail and thats it. so they where in the right. what ever you have to do to find a bail jumper you doit because your money and ass on the line.
Im not saying the cops were right or wrong..but judgeing from the blacked out windows, and all the stuff she is hording, and bus with the blacked out windows and such...the woman has issues to begin with...they DO have to show a warrant to search a home....but they do not have to answer to any questions...and they are also supposed to take people outside, and they NEVER let you just stand there yelling at them with a camera on your shoulder video taping everything that is happening...lol
I believe a united states marshal does not need a warrant to enter your home. Also, a game warden has all the rights of a state trooper plus all his encon officer rights. An encon officer may also enter your home provided he has reasonable cause to believe a crime has been committed with respect to the law. Example-- If you have a live Red Tail hawk in a cage, he does not need a warrant to enter. I personally met two US marshals one time and they were most polite and courteous. Your blowing smok
@doctorofghetto Who will charge them? We no longer go by the Constitution and the entire Justice Department has changed. Look it up. The Justice Department is totally different from even when Bush was in office and Bush was as crooked as a snake. The Constitution has been the law of the land for two hundred years although it has never been trampled on like now.
@dkiddroxyahoocom Who will charge them? We no longer go by the Constitution and the entire Justice Department has changed. Look it up. The Justice Department is totally different from even when Bush was in office and Bush was as crooked as a snake. The Constitution has been the law of the land for two hundred years although it has never been trampled on like now.
@amyalewine While this is true, and I do see you're point, it still saddens me to think that we don't even have a good man/good-enough man at the judge level. You're right, SAD BUT TRUE!
All she had to do was call the U.S.Marshall's Service that very moment and it would stop that stuff right there. Most folks don't know that the Marshall's Sevice loves to straighten out cops that violate thier rights. It's what they are there for.
For that woman to be able to stick to her guns and not waiver her rights AND do what she needed to do for the eventual? Civil/Criminal complaints against these "thugs", well, she's a hero.
These actions take place everyday, in every state, and I'm very surprised her video camera wasn't "bumped" out of her hand and destroyed under a boot.
Even if they had a PAPER "warrant" for whatever "PERSON", they would still be in the wrong. The word "person" actually means CORPORATION in a law dictionary, you guys!
Are u a Corporate Entity or Legal Fiction?
I THINK NOT.
Why is "your" name always in ALL CAPS on your DL, SS, BIRTH Cert, BANK STATEments, CREDIT CARD, etc?
They get u 2 REPRESENT that fiction & then they gotcha.
@JustinR32T how so? if she say she doesn't know allen, they say they have a warrent then they say they don't need one then it's I don't actually have one, ohh we didn't find him we don't know whet you're talking about mam, idiocy
this is a great video. he started to say i'm a bad man. they are the law they don't need no stinking warrant. you have the right to remain silent if you do not sit quietly we will beat you till you are quiet is the message i get from most law en"FORCE"ment. if you don't do as they say, look at what they did over seas. i'm still left wondering who the real terrorists are. at this point i think anyone packing a pistol is a terrorist. the real enemy is that taxman. tax money buys those monkey suits
here's the problem with bail enforcement agancies and bail bonds agencies. In the states that don't regulate these agentcies the agent doesn't actually need to have the warrent with them. obviously there's a problem with that. the constatution was created so the government can't hold too much power, agreed? a bail agent doesn't work with or for the government so technically they can enter your home. there's a problem with that too. I could go on for days on this and i am a bail agent.
If Someone Comes into your home without a warrant or without proper identification, you have the right to protect yourself, and you can use a gun if you fell you are in danger.
@Venilon Exactly what I was thinking. There have been a couple of cases in our area where a home invasion took place and the perps were dressed similar to police. This is scary, because I would have shot them and then been in trouble for shooting a cop. That was very stupid on their part.
A bench warrant does not give the right to enter someone's home. Bail enforcement agents or not besides that they did not even show a warrant. THEY COULD HAVE BEEN ANY GUY POSING AS A POLICE OFFICER.!
Well guys, if the person they're looking for has skipped bail, they don't need a warrant. A skipjumper is considered the same as a person that's escaped from jail.
This is a Federal rights issue and crime. This woman should use this video to launch a criminal investigation into the county of Kern by the FBI or Justice Department. Why hasn't charges been brought against the bail agent yet. Big brother is here!!!!
@playvinnie -- I'm in agreement with you about their behavior, but I'm saying that in some 'conditions of bail' it requires you to state an 'address of residence' and 'address of record' -- both of which are subject to search for an individual if they 'jump' bail (fail to show up to court on the appointed date..).
Obama's team voted to extend the Patriot Act and keep it in-force, though Bush's version was due to expire Jan. 1. 2010, so don't blame the elephants -- we have bigger problems.
@playvinnie -- While nobody can argue that the Feds haven't taken a huge bite out of our freedoms and society (1/6 of the economy with Health Care Bill, 1/3 of the Auto Industry, control of AIG and most major Banks, ya-dee-ya-dee-ya..) recently with huge power grabs, extending the Patriot Act, etc., let's not make normal things out to be more than they are. Things are getting scary enough, if you ask me.
I'm afraid many of the comments here are completely off-base. If an individual provided that particular address as his 'place of residence' while getting bailed out of jail, then the bail bondsmen and enforcers from the Sheriff's dept. of Kern Co. can legally go into that house without any physical warrant. The only exception to this is if that individual was never associated with that particular address.
@kamidrummer - Correct! The 'warrant' in this case is a bench warrant that stays in-force if bail has been 'skipped'; I saw a neighbor many years ago get picked up the same way, long before the Patriot Act was in play. He'd bailed out on a DUI or something like that, and forgot his court date; they came to his 'address of record' and picked him up, simple as that...
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
The moral of the story: Next time don't open the door unless you are physically able to repel boarders. SIt in your easy chair with your rifle and let the come in by way of force. Don't discuss your rights with agents of the state. They don't know your rights and dont care about them. They care about "Going Home" and collecting a check. Your rights are not in their plan. She lost the debate when she opened the door.
@whiskeydelta556 If she would have been more polite and asked if they saw the person they are after come into her home if they say no then ask them for a search warent NOT AN AREST WARENT. That being said she can get a nice new house from the money she will get from the law suit.
I know the Bail agents have the right to pursue a suspect if they have reasonable cause to believe he's in a building. But I also know a set up when I see one and the police were using the bail agents as a way around their requirement to obtain a search warrant. My guess is the arrest will stand but dude will win in a civil case against the police for violating his rights !
Wow... People, please learn some BASIC law concepts before you start screaming " HER RIGHTS!" They do not need to produce a search warrant when a bail agent has a bench warrant. Police officers were called by the bail agent for assistance in apprehending a known felon at his registered place of residence. Grow up kids, this is the country you live in and the country you let get here. Don't like it? Maybe you shouldn't have voted the assholes that have been in office the past 60 years.
I cannot say I "like" this video, but I am glad she took it, and I am glad someone posted it for everyone to see. We need to shine a very bright light on the abuses of our rights whenever they are violated, regardless who is doing the violating, but especially when those v iolaters are the ones to whom we are urged to entrust our safety.
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
It's ok to enter and search a property without a warrant as long as you're "polite and quietly walking around the house?"...I would think that far right-conservatives as well as ACLU types could agree on this one...
@MrDBCooperstein just saying it wasn't as bad as the hype said it was. They may have broken the law, and if so that will be settled in court or by the internal review. The police state crap I'm worried about is when they drag the woman to jail, rummage through all her belongings, leaving the place trashed, and break through the doors with guns drawn. Do you remember what they did in New Orleans after the hurricane? They went door to door stealing people legal firearms... why no headlines?
@MrDBCooperstein just saying it wasn't as bad as the hype said it was. They may have broken the law, and if so that will be settled in court or by the internal review. The police state crap I'm worried about is when they drag the woman to jail, rummage through all her belongings, leaving the place trashed, and break through the doors with guns drawn. Do you remember what they did in New Orleans after the hurricane? They went door to door stealing peoples legal firearms... why no headlines?
@MrDBCooperstein just saying it wasn't as bad as the hype said it was. They may have broken the law, and if so that will be settled in court or by the internal review. The police state crap I'm worried about is when they drag the woman to jail, rummage through all her belongings, leaving the place trashed, and break through the doors with guns drawn. Do you remember what they did in New Orleans after the hurricane? They went door to door stealing peoples legal firearms... why no headlines?
Come on, this isn't police state behavior. If you cry wolf at every shadow, when the real thing comes no one will notice or do anything about it. These dudes call her Maam, they are polite(other than the door knocking), they quietly walk around, not throwing her stuff around, just looking for the dude that skipped bail, that she probably had living there. What does she expect to happen when her friend living in her pad skips bail? She can hide him under a blanket and they can't come in?
she should maybe be entitled to $50 for the trouble and inconvenience at most. If they tried to bust her on anything they found in there, she would get off, but they are looking for a criminal she clearly knows. Coupled with her behavior you can see how they would be pushy, and not believe her statements about him not being there. If she gets any lawsuit award of thousands coming out of tax payers pockets it would be a travesty. Make the dudes clean her yard or something.
Most cops are punks and work hand in hand with federal punks. Talk of Constitutional rights will only get you laughed at now in the USA.
America is in the toilet and it's due to armed patriots sitting on their asses and watching Nascar while most Militias and NRA members are rat bitches who actually brown nose the feds.
She is a whack job, there was an obvious reason for them to be there. Moral of the story don't aid and abet criminals and the police won't show up at your door.
@bountyhunter1551 Your an idiot, the government must follow due process & unless the guy is a known resident or they saw him enter the house, the arrest warrant did not cover their actions.
If LEO are allowed to "game & work" the system, then someday, the same "game" will apply to you, even if you have nothing to hide. This is the same attitude congress showed when they "gamed" the system to pass health care reform. The constitution & due process guards our liberties & must be respected.
@mjs48130 That is exactly the point for all you know the bail agents saw him run in the house, they call law enforcement to stand by and keep the peace....maybe he got out of there while they were waiting for law enforcement...WE weren't there so WE don't know what happened before the nuts camera went on...but really who has papers already drawn up waiting for law enforcement to show up
@mjs48130 the thing is, this wasn't so bad as its hype. Why were there no headlines when New Orleans police actually went door to door removing legal firearms from their legal owners under threat of force, after Katrina? THAT was certainly criminal, unconstitutional and police-state behavior.
Not to mention, you can vote for your Sheriff. So he actually works for and is accountable to the local people. If these deputies broke the law they will be reprimanded.
You're an idiot, bountyhunter. She wasn't aiding and abetting criminals, neither was she doing anything wrong. It was her place of residence and they entered it without warrant or her permission which is illegal. The reason wasn't obvious at all, her rights were trampled upon and you call her a whack job, wow.
You need to be careful passing judgment on this without the facts. If this guy who jumped bail was a legal resident, renter, etc of this property and he agreed to some sort of de facto search of his premise by law enforcement and the bails bondsman as per terms of his bail, then this woman has NO recourse.
If this is not the case, then this woman has recourse. The question is.... who is the guy on bail and does he legally live in this house?
thanks for posting this - classic. Thanks to the Patriot Act we here in America only have to be suspected as some sort of terrorist in order to be apprehended now. I wonder who they were looking for...
They are aggravating! If they would have shown her some type of paper to calm her down, but no...they just shoved her and walked right in. Scary!! Cops these days & not all cops because we have a lot of good cops out there still, but they can be just as bad as the criminals on the streets. Goodness.
@lipoicacid the dude they were looking for probably lived there at some point, giving them that right. We don't know the facts now, but a judge & jury would see them all, if this annoying (at worse) inconvenience is even worth a lawsuit. THe part I'd be pissed about most is the dude sticking his head at the window and ordering me to open the door, but thats just me and one of my pet peeves......
@joejohnson043 Unless they saw the man run into the house they HAVE to have a warent even if it was his house and 100 people called in and told the cops that the man they were looking for was in the house.
If the woman was smart she would have asked the Sherifs to arest the bail bonds man for breaking and entering.
@hogstatus650 Right you are! It's just the beginning. It's mind boggling how bad it's going to get. Can you just imagine when it gets to the point of your neighbors breaking your door down to get food. It's going to happen. We are still only in the early stages of this devastating catastrophy and collapse of America. Pray and be still. Pray for wisdom and discernment and understanding.
should have shot them on site as none of them identified themselves. she would have been well with the law. yet another reason to support the 2nd, to protect all your other rights from those who wish to take them from you
These cops have got to stop watching scripted TV programs! Real law enforcement isn't like what's portrayed on TV. We are a nation of laws, not what some cops "thinks" because he saw it on the tube. This woman would have been within her right to fend-off these terrorists with firepower. This is nothing less than a criminal act of home invasion, and would justify the use of brute force by the land owner.
Ok, time has passed - did she sue
Did she win?
If not, how do we prevent these thugs from just coming in, if we do not open the door?
themanningsjdsjjj 4 months ago
kinda feel bad about the women she is wrong
Phoenixadj 5 months ago in playlist More videos from fyrstikken
Not to be rude: - BUT. "BOOM! Headshot!" Time. Illegal trespassing - even police can be shot. :)
UnwaveredFaith 9 months ago
@shandirewis This was in Kern County, California
kcsd0803 10 months ago
as long as a bail enforcement agent goes to the sheriff's office in the county he's in and tells them what he's doing, he does not have to have a warrant. A prisoner is owned by a bail bondsman until he or she has gone to court. so what i'm trying to say is when you pay that 10% you have freedom from jail and thats it. so they where in the right. what ever you have to do to find a bail jumper you doit because your money and ass on the line.
bullridingmike 1 year ago
Im not saying the cops were right or wrong..but judgeing from the blacked out windows, and all the stuff she is hording, and bus with the blacked out windows and such...the woman has issues to begin with...they DO have to show a warrant to search a home....but they do not have to answer to any questions...and they are also supposed to take people outside, and they NEVER let you just stand there yelling at them with a camera on your shoulder video taping everything that is happening...lol
MrCableguyken 1 year ago
They don't need one but he stated he had one bullshit this dnt make any sense
KCBellyDancer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"you have been served" haha
MrSupasexi 1 year ago
I believe a united states marshal does not need a warrant to enter your home. Also, a game warden has all the rights of a state trooper plus all his encon officer rights. An encon officer may also enter your home provided he has reasonable cause to believe a crime has been committed with respect to the law. Example-- If you have a live Red Tail hawk in a cage, he does not need a warrant to enter. I personally met two US marshals one time and they were most polite and courteous. Your blowing smok
arc606q 1 year ago
@doctorofghetto Who will charge them? We no longer go by the Constitution and the entire Justice Department has changed. Look it up. The Justice Department is totally different from even when Bush was in office and Bush was as crooked as a snake. The Constitution has been the law of the land for two hundred years although it has never been trampled on like now.
amyalewine 1 year ago
So what happened?
amyalewine 1 year ago
I hope you sued the heck out of them! That's about as un-american as you can get.
dkiddroxyahoocom 1 year ago
@dkiddroxyahoocom Who will charge them? We no longer go by the Constitution and the entire Justice Department has changed. Look it up. The Justice Department is totally different from even when Bush was in office and Bush was as crooked as a snake. The Constitution has been the law of the land for two hundred years although it has never been trampled on like now.
amyalewine 1 year ago
@amyalewine While this is true, and I do see you're point, it still saddens me to think that we don't even have a good man/good-enough man at the judge level. You're right, SAD BUT TRUE!
dkiddroxyahoocom 1 year ago
All she had to do was call the U.S.Marshall's Service that very moment and it would stop that stuff right there. Most folks don't know that the Marshall's Sevice loves to straighten out cops that violate thier rights. It's what they are there for.
nkgdallas 1 year ago
@nkgdallas Let me have some of that you are smoking. Eric Holder is the Law. US Marshall follows him no matter what you have heard.
amyalewine 1 year ago
Scariest thing I've seen in a long time, no B.S.
For that woman to be able to stick to her guns and not waiver her rights AND do what she needed to do for the eventual? Civil/Criminal complaints against these "thugs", well, she's a hero.
These actions take place everyday, in every state, and I'm very surprised her video camera wasn't "bumped" out of her hand and destroyed under a boot.
Jalinko 1 year ago
Man I hope you sued those guys.
dale3858 1 year ago
fuck court, you enter but you will never get to leave,,,} : }
fawndel 1 year ago
The police are completely in the wrong here.
Visit world free man society . O R G (no spaces)
Even if they had a PAPER "warrant" for whatever "PERSON", they would still be in the wrong. The word "person" actually means CORPORATION in a law dictionary, you guys!
Are u a Corporate Entity or Legal Fiction?
I THINK NOT.
Why is "your" name always in ALL CAPS on your DL, SS, BIRTH Cert, BANK STATEments, CREDIT CARD, etc?
They get u 2 REPRESENT that fiction & then they gotcha.
LOOK THIS UP!
xSavant 1 year ago 2
God you people have no idea what you are talking about and this lady is obviously INSANE!
People, use GOOGLE before posting about information that you do not know about.
JustinR32T 1 year ago
@JustinR32T and this bullshit of "YOU HAVE BEEN SERVED!"
People, stop being SHEEP!!! She OPENED the door. She is crazy. They had a WARRANT for CRIMINAL.
What if the the CRIMINAL was living, (hiding), next door to YOU! What if he was a murderer, a pedophile? A rapist?
Listen to her TALK... she is BATSHIT INSANE!!
JustinR32T 1 year ago
@JustinR32T
touche
xSavant 1 year ago
@JustinR32T how so? if she say she doesn't know allen, they say they have a warrent then they say they don't need one then it's I don't actually have one, ohh we didn't find him we don't know whet you're talking about mam, idiocy
fawndel 1 year ago
they are trespassing plain and simple
Beanmaster73 1 year ago
this is a great video. he started to say i'm a bad man. they are the law they don't need no stinking warrant. you have the right to remain silent if you do not sit quietly we will beat you till you are quiet is the message i get from most law en"FORCE"ment. if you don't do as they say, look at what they did over seas. i'm still left wondering who the real terrorists are. at this point i think anyone packing a pistol is a terrorist. the real enemy is that taxman. tax money buys those monkey suits
g11690102 1 year ago
here's the problem with bail enforcement agancies and bail bonds agencies. In the states that don't regulate these agentcies the agent doesn't actually need to have the warrent with them. obviously there's a problem with that. the constatution was created so the government can't hold too much power, agreed? a bail agent doesn't work with or for the government so technically they can enter your home. there's a problem with that too. I could go on for days on this and i am a bail agent.
zachmaster2000 1 year ago
Listen after 6:02 she asks if hes a Robot, answers "yes".
jthauser 1 year ago
i have a warrant. actually i dont need a bench warrant. That cops FUCKED in court
jonerton15 1 year ago
WOW ENJOY SUING THEM FOR LOTS OF CASH!
odin422 1 year ago
Thank you for spreading my video around... fyrstikken, you are one of my heros too, so I am very honored... warmest wishes to you and yours, star*
earthicastar 1 year ago
Patriot act, nothing we can do about it. Fucking sucks
Germanboy567 1 year ago
@Germanboy567 WRONG, your Constitutional Right are Unalienable! PERIOD.
odin422 1 year ago
@odin422
Heh.
Germanboy567 1 year ago
I'd like to hear if anything further became of this. Did she take them to court?
SouthernKudzu 1 year ago
If Someone Comes into your home without a warrant or without proper identification, you have the right to protect yourself, and you can use a gun if you fell you are in danger.
Venilon 1 year ago
@Venilon Exactly what I was thinking. There have been a couple of cases in our area where a home invasion took place and the perps were dressed similar to police. This is scary, because I would have shot them and then been in trouble for shooting a cop. That was very stupid on their part.
SouthernKudzu 1 year ago
A bench warrant does not give the right to enter someone's home. Bail enforcement agents or not besides that they did not even show a warrant. THEY COULD HAVE BEEN ANY GUY POSING AS A POLICE OFFICER.!
zxzrp0 1 year ago
under federal law they dont need a warrant , hmmmmmmm this is not good
KungFatty 1 year ago
Comment removed
vidzane 1 year ago
Well guys, if the person they're looking for has skipped bail, they don't need a warrant. A skipjumper is considered the same as a person that's escaped from jail.
turrauko 1 year ago
Come into my house like that-One time !
Stormystew 1 year ago
Try that shit with a real man....
wsradio100 1 year ago
Mapp v. Ohio....period.
rockyroadsaz 1 year ago
This is a Federal rights issue and crime. This woman should use this video to launch a criminal investigation into the county of Kern by the FBI or Justice Department. Why hasn't charges been brought against the bail agent yet. Big brother is here!!!!
playvinnie 1 year ago
@playvinnie -- I'm in agreement with you about their behavior, but I'm saying that in some 'conditions of bail' it requires you to state an 'address of residence' and 'address of record' -- both of which are subject to search for an individual if they 'jump' bail (fail to show up to court on the appointed date..).
Obama's team voted to extend the Patriot Act and keep it in-force, though Bush's version was due to expire Jan. 1. 2010, so don't blame the elephants -- we have bigger problems.
TstAllTruth 1 year ago
@playvinnie -- While nobody can argue that the Feds haven't taken a huge bite out of our freedoms and society (1/6 of the economy with Health Care Bill, 1/3 of the Auto Industry, control of AIG and most major Banks, ya-dee-ya-dee-ya..) recently with huge power grabs, extending the Patriot Act, etc., let's not make normal things out to be more than they are. Things are getting scary enough, if you ask me.
TstAllTruth 1 year ago
TAKE YOUR COUNTRY BACK!~!~!
jbr1074 1 year ago
I'm afraid many of the comments here are completely off-base. If an individual provided that particular address as his 'place of residence' while getting bailed out of jail, then the bail bondsmen and enforcers from the Sheriff's dept. of Kern Co. can legally go into that house without any physical warrant. The only exception to this is if that individual was never associated with that particular address.
TstAllTruth 1 year ago
@TstAllTruth that was my thought.... they have a warrant for the guy, and if he lived or lives there, its game on.
kamidrummer 1 year ago
@kamidrummer - Correct! The 'warrant' in this case is a bench warrant that stays in-force if bail has been 'skipped'; I saw a neighbor many years ago get picked up the same way, long before the Patriot Act was in play. He'd bailed out on a DUI or something like that, and forgot his court date; they came to his 'address of record' and picked him up, simple as that...
TstAllTruth 1 year ago
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
playvinnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
playvinnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
playvinnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
playvinnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
playvinnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is not true. this address would have had to be verified by the sheriff and the home owner would have had to sign a paper stating that that was an authorized living address of the bailed out person. Otherwise a bailed out person could put anyones address and have it searched without cause. And if Homeland says its OK to violate the constitution then thank the republicans again.
playvinnie 1 year ago
Then you people need to wake up,,,, look at the NEW Home Land Security laws, they can come in any time they want to now,,,,,,, read it ....
brandybeckydoc 1 year ago
post the web address of the new law. Please! Id like to read it, really.
playvinnie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
post the web address of the new law. Please! Id like to read it, really.
playvinnie 1 year ago
@brandybeckydoc HR 8791 Homeland Security Bill
brandybeckydoc 1 year ago
The moral of the story: Next time don't open the door unless you are physically able to repel boarders. SIt in your easy chair with your rifle and let the come in by way of force. Don't discuss your rights with agents of the state. They don't know your rights and dont care about them. They care about "Going Home" and collecting a check. Your rights are not in their plan. She lost the debate when she opened the door.
whiskeydelta556 1 year ago
@whiskeydelta556 If she would have been more polite and asked if they saw the person they are after come into her home if they say no then ask them for a search warent NOT AN AREST WARENT. That being said she can get a nice new house from the money she will get from the law suit.
kraigthorne 1 year ago
I know the Bail agents have the right to pursue a suspect if they have reasonable cause to believe he's in a building. But I also know a set up when I see one and the police were using the bail agents as a way around their requirement to obtain a search warrant. My guess is the arrest will stand but dude will win in a civil case against the police for violating his rights !
hobo59 1 year ago
@hobo59 The guy they were looking for was not there. The only person home was the woman who shot the video.
kraigthorne 1 year ago
P.S. The people that were banging down her door and entered before police were bail agents, who don't follow the same rules as officers of the state.
alwaysfaithful1110 1 year ago
Wow... People, please learn some BASIC law concepts before you start screaming " HER RIGHTS!" They do not need to produce a search warrant when a bail agent has a bench warrant. Police officers were called by the bail agent for assistance in apprehending a known felon at his registered place of residence. Grow up kids, this is the country you live in and the country you let get here. Don't like it? Maybe you shouldn't have voted the assholes that have been in office the past 60 years.
alwaysfaithful1110 1 year ago
A sneak preview about what is comming Fyrstikken?
virn11 1 year ago
hope she sues the shit out of that sheriff and bailbondsman!
944lucifer 1 year ago
I cannot say I "like" this video, but I am glad she took it, and I am glad someone posted it for everyone to see. We need to shine a very bright light on the abuses of our rights whenever they are violated, regardless who is doing the violating, but especially when those v iolaters are the ones to whom we are urged to entrust our safety.
WitchWindy 1 year ago
A taste of the NWO.. I hate cops!
wildbill20102012 1 year ago
they dont need a warrant? That asshole said "This is not your private property." Those cops ignored her! This is an outrage!
mikelunz 1 year ago 9
@mikelunz You do not need a warrant to locate and arrest a fugitive....it is in the constitution.
peacemaker526 8 months ago
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
sdgilc 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
sdgilc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
sdgilc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
sdgilc 1 year ago
The rage I feel at these jerks just walking on in like they own the place is beyond words. I don't care what kind of scumbag she is.
These cops are ten times worse. They are using the power of the state to trample her rights to security in her person and possessions. If they had no idea whether their quarry was present, this constituted a warrantless search of an innocent civilian's home, and these guys should be FIRED.
Lucky she didn't get off a few shots at them with a 12-gauge.
sdgilc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These keystone kops are in such deeeeeeeeeep trouble, they don't even have a clue the shitstorm that is about to rain down on their heads.
Any attorney worth his salt will get her at least a cabin cruiser for this high-handed violation of the law and this scuzzy woman's civil rights.
And that ASSHOLE "bail enforcement" dickhead needs to be SHOT. "No it ain't private property, not when it comes to bail enforcement."
"Your civil rights are irrelevant."
Seriously.
sdgilc 1 year ago
These keystone kops are in such deeeeeeeeeep trouble, they don't even have a clue the shitstorm that is about to rain down on their heads.
Any attorney worth his salt will get her at least a cabin cruiser for this high-handed violation of the law and this scuzzy woman's civil rights.
And that ASSHOLE "bail enforcement" dickhead needs to be SHOT. "No it ain't private property, not when it comes to bail enforcement."
"Your civil rights are irrelevant."
Seriously.
sdgilc 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These keystone kops are in such deeeeeeeeeep trouble, they don't even have a clue the shitstorm that is about to rain down on their heads.
Any attorney worth his salt will get her at least a cabin cruiser for this high-handed violation of the law and this scuzzy woman's civil rights.
And that ASSHOLE "bail enforcement" dickhead needs to be SHOT. "No it ain't private property, not when it comes to bail enforcement."
"Your civil rights are irrelevant."
Seriously.
sdgilc 1 year ago
These keystone kops are in such deeeeeeeeeep trouble, they don't even have a clue the shitstorm that is about to rain down on their heads.
Any attorney worth his salt will get her at least a cabin cruiser for this high-handed violation of the law and this scuzzy woman's civil rights.
And that ASSHOLE "bail enforcement" dickhead needs to be SHOT. "No it ain't private property, not when it comes to bail enforcement."
"Your civil rights are irrelevant."
Seriously.
sdgilc 1 year ago
She is a nut. If she did not think they were cops she should have called 911.
kraigthorne 1 year ago
@kraigthorne
lol she knew they were cops, it was the principal she was arguing about.
180DegreeMason 1 year ago
She is a nut. If she did not think they were cops she should have called 911.
kraigthorne 1 year ago
It's ok to enter and search a property without a warrant as long as you're "polite and quietly walking around the house?"...I would think that far right-conservatives as well as ACLU types could agree on this one...
MrDBCooperstein 1 year ago
@MrDBCooperstein No way, would the conservatives agree warrentless searches like this are acceptable.
mjs48130 1 year ago
@MrDBCooperstein just saying it wasn't as bad as the hype said it was. They may have broken the law, and if so that will be settled in court or by the internal review. The police state crap I'm worried about is when they drag the woman to jail, rummage through all her belongings, leaving the place trashed, and break through the doors with guns drawn. Do you remember what they did in New Orleans after the hurricane? They went door to door stealing people legal firearms... why no headlines?
joejohnson043 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrDBCooperstein just saying it wasn't as bad as the hype said it was. They may have broken the law, and if so that will be settled in court or by the internal review. The police state crap I'm worried about is when they drag the woman to jail, rummage through all her belongings, leaving the place trashed, and break through the doors with guns drawn. Do you remember what they did in New Orleans after the hurricane? They went door to door stealing peoples legal firearms... why no headlines?
joejohnson043 1 year ago
@MrDBCooperstein just saying it wasn't as bad as the hype said it was. They may have broken the law, and if so that will be settled in court or by the internal review. The police state crap I'm worried about is when they drag the woman to jail, rummage through all her belongings, leaving the place trashed, and break through the doors with guns drawn. Do you remember what they did in New Orleans after the hurricane? They went door to door stealing peoples legal firearms... why no headlines?
joejohnson043 1 year ago
Fire up the lawyers, her constitutional rights were obliterated!
Dmonk08 1 year ago
Come on, this isn't police state behavior. If you cry wolf at every shadow, when the real thing comes no one will notice or do anything about it. These dudes call her Maam, they are polite(other than the door knocking), they quietly walk around, not throwing her stuff around, just looking for the dude that skipped bail, that she probably had living there. What does she expect to happen when her friend living in her pad skips bail? She can hide him under a blanket and they can't come in?
joejohnson043 1 year ago
she should maybe be entitled to $50 for the trouble and inconvenience at most. If they tried to bust her on anything they found in there, she would get off, but they are looking for a criminal she clearly knows. Coupled with her behavior you can see how they would be pushy, and not believe her statements about him not being there. If she gets any lawsuit award of thousands coming out of tax payers pockets it would be a travesty. Make the dudes clean her yard or something.
joejohnson043 1 year ago
Most cops are punks and work hand in hand with federal punks. Talk of Constitutional rights will only get you laughed at now in the USA.
America is in the toilet and it's due to armed patriots sitting on their asses and watching Nascar while most Militias and NRA members are rat bitches who actually brown nose the feds.
vdvsoldat 1 year ago
Wow... too bad she didn't cap a few of those assholes.
Josey2006 1 year ago
She is a whack job, there was an obvious reason for them to be there. Moral of the story don't aid and abet criminals and the police won't show up at your door.
bountyhunter1551 1 year ago
@bountyhunter1551 Fuck you docheubag
Josey2006 1 year ago
@bountyhunter1551 Fuck you douchebag
Josey2006 1 year ago
@bountyhunter1551 Your an idiot, the government must follow due process & unless the guy is a known resident or they saw him enter the house, the arrest warrant did not cover their actions.
If LEO are allowed to "game & work" the system, then someday, the same "game" will apply to you, even if you have nothing to hide. This is the same attitude congress showed when they "gamed" the system to pass health care reform. The constitution & due process guards our liberties & must be respected.
mjs48130 1 year ago 3
@mjs48130 That is exactly the point for all you know the bail agents saw him run in the house, they call law enforcement to stand by and keep the peace....maybe he got out of there while they were waiting for law enforcement...WE weren't there so WE don't know what happened before the nuts camera went on...but really who has papers already drawn up waiting for law enforcement to show up
bountyhunter1551 1 year ago
@mjs48130 the thing is, this wasn't so bad as its hype. Why were there no headlines when New Orleans police actually went door to door removing legal firearms from their legal owners under threat of force, after Katrina? THAT was certainly criminal, unconstitutional and police-state behavior.
Not to mention, you can vote for your Sheriff. So he actually works for and is accountable to the local people. If these deputies broke the law they will be reprimanded.
joejohnson043 1 year ago
@bountyhunter1551
You're an idiot, bountyhunter. She wasn't aiding and abetting criminals, neither was she doing anything wrong. It was her place of residence and they entered it without warrant or her permission which is illegal. The reason wasn't obvious at all, her rights were trampled upon and you call her a whack job, wow.
180DegreeMason 1 year ago
You need to be careful passing judgment on this without the facts. If this guy who jumped bail was a legal resident, renter, etc of this property and he agreed to some sort of de facto search of his premise by law enforcement and the bails bondsman as per terms of his bail, then this woman has NO recourse.
If this is not the case, then this woman has recourse. The question is.... who is the guy on bail and does he legally live in this house?
jxwhit8 1 year ago
Would love to know the outcome of this video & see if those cops got prosecuted?
Truthat77 1 year ago
Hope these idiot cops get prosecuted, the damn arrogance!!!
Truthat77 1 year ago
thanks for posting this - classic. Thanks to the Patriot Act we here in America only have to be suspected as some sort of terrorist in order to be apprehended now. I wonder who they were looking for...
sydfan526 1 year ago
seems like americans need IEDs at their doors now for self-defense
q1qeu 1 year ago
get the fuck out of her house!
IMthere4you1 1 year ago
They are aggravating! If they would have shown her some type of paper to calm her down, but no...they just shoved her and walked right in. Scary!! Cops these days & not all cops because we have a lot of good cops out there still, but they can be just as bad as the criminals on the streets. Goodness.
sjbutterfie 1 year ago
Comment removed
kingrowanthefirst 1 year ago
GO TO COURT!!!! Dont break the Law!!!
lcpd3311 1 year ago
I do hope there will be a follow up with this. I hope she goes through with it.
Kashmir2000is 1 year ago
This is a great lady. She is stronger that all those men combined.
U2Berror 1 year ago
they dont need a warrant!
cazyblood3 1 year ago
welcum to tha new werld orderrrrrr
alantecontra 1 year ago 2
So a bailbondsman can walk into any home at anytimeand make a sandwich??? I think I'll be one.I'll save loads on food and rent =D
lipoicacid 1 year ago
@lipoicacid the dude they were looking for probably lived there at some point, giving them that right. We don't know the facts now, but a judge & jury would see them all, if this annoying (at worse) inconvenience is even worth a lawsuit. THe part I'd be pissed about most is the dude sticking his head at the window and ordering me to open the door, but thats just me and one of my pet peeves......
joejohnson043 1 year ago
@joejohnson043 Unless they saw the man run into the house they HAVE to have a warent even if it was his house and 100 people called in and told the cops that the man they were looking for was in the house.
If the woman was smart she would have asked the Sherifs to arest the bail bonds man for breaking and entering.
kraigthorne 1 year ago
she should have blown at least one of the away
DERAJ13 1 year ago 3
Whoa Whoa Whoa
fofo4meeee 1 year ago
i live in that town. i know that sheriff.
they abuse us a lot.
my body is falling apart because of the abuse.
THEY DO THIS ALL THE TIME
THEY DONT NEED THE PATRIOT ACT.
THUGS!
Precognist 1 year ago
@Precognist Make a series of vidoes about it and post them.
lipoicacid 1 year ago
Comment removed
hogstatus650 1 year ago
Wow! It's just the beginning...
hogstatus650 1 year ago 5
@hogstatus650 Right you are! It's just the beginning. It's mind boggling how bad it's going to get. Can you just imagine when it gets to the point of your neighbors breaking your door down to get food. It's going to happen. We are still only in the early stages of this devastating catastrophy and collapse of America. Pray and be still. Pray for wisdom and discernment and understanding.
bigbono12 1 year ago
Come to my home try that at my home !
rem0709 1 year ago 2
@rem0709 YOU WILL BE ANOTHER ''WACO''???
lipoicacid 1 year ago
What has become of humanity. It was all foreseen. Poor woman- defenseless and violated. And most Americans have no idea about what's happening.
bigbono12 1 year ago 3
should have shot them on site as none of them identified themselves. she would have been well with the law. yet another reason to support the 2nd, to protect all your other rights from those who wish to take them from you
cbr6864 1 year ago 10
These cops have got to stop watching scripted TV programs! Real law enforcement isn't like what's portrayed on TV. We are a nation of laws, not what some cops "thinks" because he saw it on the tube. This woman would have been within her right to fend-off these terrorists with firepower. This is nothing less than a criminal act of home invasion, and would justify the use of brute force by the land owner.
joe80dman 1 year ago
Good ol' California at it again... Well, I'm going to say this is going to be a precursor for what's to come.
thanks for sharing this.
praeeo 1 year ago 2
Such an amazing display for the disregard and respect of people.
craniumxd 1 year ago
@craniumxd : and a disregard of the Law. If these men are considered "law enforcement", why do they violate the Law?
joe80dman 1 year ago
they can be anyone !
artin74 1 year ago
unbelievable!
Totothemonkey 1 year ago