You guys are BF wankers.. The QBZ is unique in itself. The gas system is short-stroke, while M16 is direct impingement and ak47/74 is long-stroke... short stroke has balanced accuracy and reliability.
What kind of non-sense is that “ internal mechanism just like ak47"?!~?!
This gun is like m4a1 except its bullet make it a little differnt from m4a1.... compare 5.8mm(qbz 95 ammo) to 5.56(m4a1 ammo).
it has a slight faster fire rate then 5.56.(about 5% faster)
it has same damage amount as 5.56(i will guess about %3 more penetration)
it has just a little more stable accruacy then m4a1(about %10 i would say)
over all its the same.. but if in a war 5.8mm would win bcuz its 5.8mm fits all qbz series gun(lmg,sniper ETC) so china can fast produce same type ammo
It's so much like the French FA-MAS in appearance and a little like the British SA-80 I can't think why they spent 30 years to come out with this rifle in this weird calibre. I think it's a huge embarrassment for the Chinese that they'd rather not discuss. If people are honest they'll agree that the best small arms of the last century have come out of America and Europe (primarily Germany and Belgium) and most 5.56 rifles today are simply descendants of the MP44
1. So that if China is invaded, other countries using either Soviet 5.45 or NATO 5.56 won't be able to use Chinese ammunition
2. 5.8 is supposedly a higher performance caliber than the smaller 5.45 or 5.56. To me, it makes sense because the 6.5 Grendel tested by US was shown to be superior than 5.56. Since 5.8 approaches 6.5, it should perform better, especially in stopping power.
@Bournetolive I don't agree about the calibre (your first reason that is) because there is so much 7.62 in circulation and production I doubt it'll ever run out, + every country in that area seems to use that ammo. I just think it's a bit of a screw up by the chinese, I mean how many infantry rifles will they have to produce to completely adopt this 5.8mm round? If it's a higher performance it doesn't mean it'll be a successful transition. History is littered with these type of oversights.....
Well, we won't know well we? Before the 5.8 came along, China didn't have a small intermediate round for assault rifles - it only had the 7.62 x 39. I mean, how did NATO and Warsaw Pact adopt their small intermediate rounds? Are these countries such geniuses that their intermediate rounds would automatically work, while the one China came up with wouldn't? Plus, if you think China can't produce enough rifles to chamber this round, then you clearly haven't heard of Norinco.
Externally, it may look like European bull-pups. However, what is important is the internal mechanisms - I believe the mech resembles that of the AK and other Soviet small arms (modified for greater accuracy by eliminating heavy action seen in AK bolt). I am not sure of the exact details, so do some research if you are interested. I do know that it is unique in combining several different features from existing guns, and that it is also influenced by Type 81 rifle.
Also, there is a Type 03 being produced now apparently. Nobody knows if it is going to be a general service rifle, replacing QBZ-95. However, its design is a return to the standard assault rifle design in that it resembles the AK externally. However, it is very different from it - probably much more accurate for starters.
@jonasldg It's made to showcase that it is possible to speed reload with this weapon since there are always people who say it's "impossible" to do so with bullpups.
And also America can't go all out war.. Cos look at your economy. ITS shitbox even australias doing better than you! Your largest economic state califonia IS BANKRUPT :) haha where gonna attack china, what a joke:) I mean AUSTRALIA is better of than you:) all you guys do is pick on the small countries.. OH YEAH saddams making terror weapons OH NO! Actually saddam spent his time writing novels. Apparently there pretty good. You bunch of redneck dumbfucks. BTW we don't have kangaroos casually jum
Watch what your talking about. war does make a countries economy suffer, especially when your homeland is being attacked. Sure America came out of the great depression from war but thats because the mainland was never attacked. Look at pearl harbor. And what do you expect when the overseas companies give the manufacturers a low budget. If you don't like Chinese stuff then throw out everything that's chinese in your house. Bet you your house will be half empty without Chinese stuff. china does
all bullpups have a nasty triger because it is what maks it wat it is an thay are less acuret so you do need to reload faster but its not much faster than a profichent us soldier , personaly the ak's verient rifles are the best wepon chinas ever made politeck &mac90
@oeyesea No, China depends on Australia for all its coal and iron and stuff. It doesn't depend on America at all. China manufactures SO MUCH stuff for the western world. A lot of people say "we could just move the foundries to the US" but if that happened, China could divert truckloads of labour to the military and US labour costs would skyrocket. Chinese workers cope with low pay, usually bad conditions and terrible hours. There might not be a war, but America needs China.
@JBXyooj nope only for border guards, where training isn't as widely available will they recieve the qbz-03. cause qbz 95 requires more training. border guards have less time so they need something they are used to.
China will be the true cause of "2012" ...for America.
Unless we team up with Russia, Korea, Taiwan and 10+ plus countries to waste them, America is just an asset to the Chinese, however if we do, America will fail economically.Oh the irony, (I'm now brushing up on my Chinese)
My only relief that it is for Special Forces, oh wait that still is a problem. lol
@Pimpzilla300 america will just fall by itself. they create a fear so create that they believe is true. eg. they believe iraq had wmd to such a degree they went to war. they believe china will start a war, that in the end it will be themselves starting the war due to this invisible fear and threat that they created.
@Pimpzilla300 I'm Chinese but I honestly hope America can become a better friend with China rather than inventing the unlikely fears and going into war for all the wrong reasons. Economy, healthcare, social stability and strong stable government should be the prime concerns for America right now. War will only drag your country down. I hope Obama realised that from his mid term elections. USA is definitelynot the utopia that its citizens hoped it to be.
@pakjai Who cares about being friends with China? They have terrible human rights records, ripoff EVERYTHING known, see their ripoff of the Russian SU-27, and frankly are only good for cheap unskilled labor. You don't need to be friends to do business, and frankly China's a big **** as it is. Check ye facts, war doesn't drag a country's economy down, in fact it does the opposite. See WWII and it's effect on the employment as it drew us out of the great depression. Morale may drop, but not econ.
@matrixdude171 Did you say rip off of Russian SU 27? They brought the license to make them in China under the name J-11a and the upgraded ones J-11b. Their latest J-20 working prototype looks a lot more modern than the Russian designed T-50. Technology from B-2 spirit bomber, stealth paint, solid fuel for rocket propulsion, low signiture exhaust, stealth cruise missiles and some radar, satelite were passed over by the US to repay debts. War doesn't generate money and jobs for all.
@matrixdude171 We sure do have a horrible human rights record, but so do you. Guantanamo Bay, bombings of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, Vietnam, the Gulf War... The list goes on and on. Hey, at least we haven't invaded any countries lately. By the way the US owes China a lot of debt.
@88arau Your a fool for believing the US won't have to pay back the debt to China. The US doesn't necessarily have to pay back in cash, it'll have to yield to China's interests in the future. If you owe a certain amount of money to the bank, you think you won't have to pay it back?
@1JesseW: Once the world economic system collapses. The debt will be absolved, or there will be War. It is mathematically impossible for the US to pay the debt back. Our GDP barely covers the interest.
@88arau I'm talking about that kind of interest, I'm talking about political and economic interest. One way or another, the US is going to pay back the debt. If not in money, then in resources.
@88arau The US will be paying the debt for decades, I'm not saying all at once. I'm pretty sure that if the Chinese knew that the US will not pay back the debts, they will not lend it to the US in the first place. I don't need to read a history book to know that. There are also many more nations besides China who have lent money to the US, and they all know that the US is going to have to pay back sooner or later.
@88arau If the Chinese knew that the US was not going to pay them back, they would not lend them money in the first place. I don't need to read a history book to know that. By the way, don't make the hasty generalization about economic wars always turning into physical wars.
@matrixdude171 You know its hard to believe that a country that once was inhabit by intelligence and friendly people are now home of arrogant rednecks like yourself. I dont know if your noticing but the U.S. its not making much friends lately , in fact the anti american sentiments are quite strong even in your "allied states".
"You dont need to be friends to do business" Do you think that German's , French , Italians , Japanese are your friends ? Weapons wont save you from the financial crisis.
@Bhethar right.... that's why the fed was bailing out a ton of european banks? And that's why europe is talking about austerity? If you want to argue financial crisis, please just stop, because we both know everyone was hit. You don't need to be friends to do business, just look at the middle east relations. We still do business and a lot of the middle east hates us. I'd say it could be a nice and friendly world if people didn't just rip-off hard work that is put in to make new inventions.
@pakjai if it's creating fear that's something China's good at. Try protesting against the government and you'll have agents riding down your doors. The Chinese government is really fucked up right now and as money keeps pouring in it's only going to get worse. I disagree about war dragging the United States down, war can really bring up an economy. That's why the US has the biggest economy in the world. It's prolong wars like Iraq and Afghanistan that fuck things up.
@FloOFy2 so to you, when the chinese gov is getting more money without starting wars=fucked up?
but when the american gov is getting more money (even getting the biggest economy due to this) by starting wars= a good thing?
looks who's really fucked up now lol. what's your business anyway about how the chinese gov deals with its own country. its not like china is inciting fear over the american people. that's what the US gov does.
@FloOFy2 and you pretend to care about the situation in china. that the people are oppressed by their fear-mongering government. and yet you said, in the same paragraph (which i find extremely hilarious), something like that war is not bad because it stimulates the american economy.
so in other words, you're trying to take the moral high-ground about a people's oppression, while supporting american invasions of countries (which btw oppresses people too) for money.....
@P0L1T1C5 I'm just stating the facts here....there's no reason to get offended.
I never said that the US is perfect, but the thing is we have rights, people in China don't. Try protesting about their government over there like we do everyday. I'm not saying war is good, I forget what I replied to but I'm saying that war really excels a country. The US wouldn't be were it is today if it wasn't for WWII which just boomed our economy. I don't see how you can get offended by this....
@FloOFy2 if you dont see any hypocrisy in what you stated, then i guess that's the reason why you think there shouldnt be any reason to get offended.
remember you replied a comment from pakjai? im just wondering why im not supposed to be offended, while it seems like you were offended by what pakjai said. it's something to think about.
btw, in china, many people do protest. just search it up on youtube, even recently. tiananmen square protest happened a long time ago. be updated.
@P0L1T1C5 no, I'm pretty sure I wasn't offended as I said before, just stating facts. Yes, you can protest in China, just like you can protest in Libiyia...
The only problem is that you'll get shot or arrested. And yes, I'm talking about today. The fact that if you just say "protest" over the phone in China your call would be dropped. Do some research on how much China censors their media.
@FloOFy2 you never said you were offended before. i just felt that you were by the way you replied to him/her. and for what it's worth, i didnt get offended by what you said. it's far too normal for me now.
wait, you're saying "you can protest in china/libya" as if there are big consequences. like i said before, tiananmen was a long time ago. just do a simple search on youtube. put like "china protest feb/march 2011". none of those people were shot or arrested, otherwise, there'd be coverage.
@FloOFy2 and before you say something like "there'd be no coverage because china censors everything", i want you to know that im talking about western news coverage. even tiananmen square had a huge coverage from domestic and foreign news sources.
and if you look at these youtube videos (if you search for them that is), youd see no one is getting shot or run over by a tank.
@FloOFy2 oh and also Libya is doing what any country would do when there's an armed rebellion......they fight back. do you expect their soldiers to stand idle when they see rebels trying to kill them?
Are you implying that Obama is a war mongering republican? You're an idiot if you think a Democrat is going to instigate with another country. Just wait til you put another Bush in office and you'll see this country at war again.
@reeboki3 um, seriously? Obama - Libya. LBJ - Vietnam. JFK - Vietnam. Truman - Korea. Roosevelt - WW2. Wilson - WW1. All Democrat presidents that opted for war. Just because someone's a Democrat doesn't mean they're a peacenik, & if someone is a Republican does not mean they're a warmonger.
@pakjai Im italian and i totally think alike you. In the EU we dont have this "P.R. of China/Russia want to destroy us" sentiment.
In this moments the whole world is suffering for the financial crisis , the social status of western countries including USA and EU are declining dramaticatly so it would be a good time to invest in everithing but the military. Nor the P.R. of China and neither Russia will benefit of a war with the U.S.A. since they are economically dependent one from another.
For Paratroop and Marines(because the space), this gun make sense. But for army,no. Also the Mag look way to close to change it fast in combat,s It's in somewhat awkward postion. Anyway the Type 03 is already in production.
I profess to not be an expert on Chinese Military Doctrine but, last I checked most modern armed forces are moving away from dropping mags. Thus I find myself interested in the the question of how fast could this rifle be reloaded if mag dropping was forbidden.
@asymmetricstudygroup when your being fired upon, i would think you would have more important things to think about. what's the use of saving a magazine, at the price of getting a soldier killed
@myfunkychannel Oh that I know. It was just so much I'm more of an advocate of the traditional system m-16/ak series/g36/ ect because you can reload it must faster, you don't have to expose half your body when aiming from the left side of a corner (assuming your right handed). I know that this is an emergency reload. Just my bias against the bullpup design.
@AAV47 go check videos online you'll see it receives the same punishment as ak series do and yet works like its new. reliability was a key feature in the design must list for them
this looks like the worst imitation of the m16. i mean the desgin,why can't chinese make something without copying others? my airsoft m16 owns this..lol. chinese make their own version ak-47, mig-21 and all russian technologies and get few pennys by selling them to north korea.
@chakdemumbai234 They've paid the Russians to learn about their technology dipshit!! if you hate this gun then why are you watching this video?? QBZ never copied the m16 (btw the m16 is soo out of style and its soo high recoil for a .223)!! if you know shit about this gun... dont comment!! the fucking american media effected you to believe everything made in china is bad!! they why are you wearing your fucking nike shoes!!?
that looks like a mixture between the famas, the tar-21, the pp 2000, m16, and the aa12...not trying to sound like a cod nerd (I play more than cod) but I just wanted to know...I love bullpups and I was wondering why it looked like that. :/
yeah, the selector switch of the 95 is probably the worst placed selector in the history of assault rifles.
however ive seen the prototype of the 95G and its vastly improved, selector is next to the trigger, carrying handle is lower and there are small rails next to the front sight for accessories.
the QBZ-03 was developed because northern soldiers with taller builds found the QBZ-95 to be too compact and awkward to use. the 03 is basically the same rifle but in a conventional AK style layout so range and accuracy should be similar apart from the larger size.
its currently being produced in the same rate as the 95 and the PAP, frontline and support troops use both though which battalions use them is generally determined by geography.
yeah but not many countries have such a radical height difference between north and south. northern chinese often exceed 6ft+ whilst southern chinese average about 5'2.
besides, the PLA is so massive that even with two standard weapons, each one probably has more than that of many nations' entire standard issued arsenal.
same caliber and magazine, but the QBZ-03 isn't issued to frontline troops.
Honestly though, I'm biased towards the conventional layout, maybe I've been shooting AR-15's for too long, lol. It just feels more natural when doing a quick mag change in my opinion.
QBZ03 are used by border forces today, because they are long enough to frighten border crossers(-_-!because 95 really looks like a toy) soilders can also use gunstock for beating ,it's not funny to fire in border area.
well i know rangers, airborne, and spec ops are using them, but a sure sign that they are about to change is all USMC NCOs now get M4s and since the marines always get the older equipment well you figure it out
@AlexSaysHi2013 wooo man!!! I cant believe it!! come to think of it America never once made a bullpup in the history of its military!! man you gave me a eureka moment XD
@Pyromaniac721 that simply depends on cost and social climate like whether we're goin to war or not, that's is just if we change rifle AT ALL, the M-16 right now is going strong but with the implementation of the SCAR in several units including the 101st Airborne and 5th Marines I believe, the M-16 won't be around for more that another decade...in my opinion
@GurgleOneSixSix yes, a place where you can post videos on any subjects, i just figured anyone watching videos on a certain subject would have a bit on knowledge on it...just sayin
@cabraden7 well it was and still is a good solid and reliable rifle design, bit rough to start, which garnered a bad reputation, but it was still a good weapon, and just like with any other main rifle it's goin
This has been flagged as spam show
china 4ever
down with this amerikkka shit
Porrameneitor 1 day ago
The grip sort of acts as a magazine guide, in keeping with the bullpup format, like the foregrip on an AMD-65.
IggyHazard 3 weeks ago
I don't know what the fuck you kids are all talking about, but I do have to say that this Chinese soldier is quite adept at reloading his rifle.
Liist 1 month ago
@myfunkychannel I wonder why not.. But the Barret M95 is a bullpup sniper rifle.
NatedogJr 2 months ago
@NatedogJr The Military doesn't use the M95, we don't use bullpup rifles.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NatedogJr The Military doesn't use the M95, we don't use bullpup rifles.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 1 month ago
0:20 Doo-doo-doo doo doo.
TheUshankaBrothers 2 months ago 2
You guys are BF wankers.. The QBZ is unique in itself. The gas system is short-stroke, while M16 is direct impingement and ak47/74 is long-stroke... short stroke has balanced accuracy and reliability.
What kind of non-sense is that “ internal mechanism just like ak47"?!~?!
zhengjdc 3 months ago
this might save his life some day
mcjagermech 3 months ago
Does anyone notice his mag changes are almost under 1 second!
TruthFromTheHeart 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This gun is like m4a1 except its bullet make it a little differnt from m4a1.... compare 5.8mm(qbz 95 ammo) to 5.56(m4a1 ammo).
it has a slight faster fire rate then 5.56.(about 5% faster)
it has same damage amount as 5.56(i will guess about %3 more penetration)
it has just a little more stable accruacy then m4a1(about %10 i would say)
over all its the same.. but if in a war 5.8mm would win bcuz its 5.8mm fits all qbz series gun(lmg,sniper ETC) so china can fast produce same type ammo
weijieshlt 4 months ago
Damnit, i can't reload damn bullpups anywhere near this fast. :/
MrJohn2010 5 months ago
I am American and i think china is NOT our friend and they should be seen as a threat.
TheSeanoops 6 months ago
@TheSeanoops why that is completely stupid. you have nothing to fear. are you one of those people who just scream war all the time?
dzl92 5 months ago
@TheSeanoops u better hope their friendly because they buy or debt with out them we would be in a great depression
ufcpride93 5 months ago
@TheSeanoops u better hope their friendly because they buy or debt with out them we would be in a great depression
ufcpride93 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheSeanoops u better hope their friendly because they buy or debt with out them we would be in a great depression
ufcpride93 5 months ago
@TheSeanoops
...u stupid
accountwhereiam18 4 months ago
the chinese cant do a tactical mag change for shit
class3hotbox 8 months ago
@class3hotbox watch the video again
reeboki3 7 months ago
@reeboki3 i've seen Russians, even Americans do it better and faster on a similar platform!
class3hotbox 7 months ago
@class3hotbox no video no care
reeboki3 7 months ago
@class3hotbox BS americans dont use bullpups
myfunkychannel 3 months ago
Sweet gun , nice statics and great reliability , 5.8 is weird though....
shermanlee85856 8 months ago
It's so much like the French FA-MAS in appearance and a little like the British SA-80 I can't think why they spent 30 years to come out with this rifle in this weird calibre. I think it's a huge embarrassment for the Chinese that they'd rather not discuss. If people are honest they'll agree that the best small arms of the last century have come out of America and Europe (primarily Germany and Belgium) and most 5.56 rifles today are simply descendants of the MP44
tonee727 9 months ago
@tonee727
Two reasons for caliber:
1. So that if China is invaded, other countries using either Soviet 5.45 or NATO 5.56 won't be able to use Chinese ammunition
2. 5.8 is supposedly a higher performance caliber than the smaller 5.45 or 5.56. To me, it makes sense because the 6.5 Grendel tested by US was shown to be superior than 5.56. Since 5.8 approaches 6.5, it should perform better, especially in stopping power.
Bournetolive 9 months ago
@Bournetolive I don't agree about the calibre (your first reason that is) because there is so much 7.62 in circulation and production I doubt it'll ever run out, + every country in that area seems to use that ammo. I just think it's a bit of a screw up by the chinese, I mean how many infantry rifles will they have to produce to completely adopt this 5.8mm round? If it's a higher performance it doesn't mean it'll be a successful transition. History is littered with these type of oversights.....
tonee727 9 months ago
@tonee727
Well, we won't know well we? Before the 5.8 came along, China didn't have a small intermediate round for assault rifles - it only had the 7.62 x 39. I mean, how did NATO and Warsaw Pact adopt their small intermediate rounds? Are these countries such geniuses that their intermediate rounds would automatically work, while the one China came up with wouldn't? Plus, if you think China can't produce enough rifles to chamber this round, then you clearly haven't heard of Norinco.
Bournetolive 9 months ago
@tonee727
Externally, it may look like European bull-pups. However, what is important is the internal mechanisms - I believe the mech resembles that of the AK and other Soviet small arms (modified for greater accuracy by eliminating heavy action seen in AK bolt). I am not sure of the exact details, so do some research if you are interested. I do know that it is unique in combining several different features from existing guns, and that it is also influenced by Type 81 rifle.
Bournetolive 9 months ago
@tonee727
Also, there is a Type 03 being produced now apparently. Nobody knows if it is going to be a general service rifle, replacing QBZ-95. However, its design is a return to the standard assault rifle design in that it resembles the AK externally. However, it is very different from it - probably much more accurate for starters.
Bournetolive 9 months ago
@Bournetolive There thinking of replacing it already? haha, well that says it all :D
tonee727 9 months ago
@tonee727 Yes and the 5.56 are also something american soldiers complain about.
reeboki3 8 months ago
qbz-95 is c-95 in wolfteam. best wep in that game.
majorballer 11 months ago
sound is off sync
soopermarjo 11 months ago
@soopermarjo Thanks for realizing that, I think most people know that
kullwarrior 11 months ago
whats so special about this gun?? what is it they are showcasing in this video?
jonasldg 11 months ago
@jonasldg It's made to showcase that it is possible to speed reload with this weapon since there are always people who say it's "impossible" to do so with bullpups.
Drownedinblood 11 months ago
that looks like a pain in the ass, kind of like trying to load a AK in your armpit, made in china uhg...
jihad76239 1 year ago
Comment removed
1JesseW 1 year ago
Made in China?
sockschappercat 1 year ago
he have slight of hand
ericown 1 year ago
@ericown LOL I can do a little better than him. I got the experience!
USAFBuster 1 year ago
And also America can't go all out war.. Cos look at your economy. ITS shitbox even australias doing better than you! Your largest economic state califonia IS BANKRUPT :) haha where gonna attack china, what a joke:) I mean AUSTRALIA is better of than you:) all you guys do is pick on the small countries.. OH YEAH saddams making terror weapons OH NO! Actually saddam spent his time writing novels. Apparently there pretty good. You bunch of redneck dumbfucks. BTW we don't have kangaroos casually jum
ppfriggen 1 year ago 5
@ppfriggen I'm Asian American, but i do agree with you about how arrogant White Americans are.
brianthao102 1 month ago
@ppfriggen Butt furious much?
DixieNormas07 1 month ago
Watch what your talking about. war does make a countries economy suffer, especially when your homeland is being attacked. Sure America came out of the great depression from war but thats because the mainland was never attacked. Look at pearl harbor. And what do you expect when the overseas companies give the manufacturers a low budget. If you don't like Chinese stuff then throw out everything that's chinese in your house. Bet you your house will be half empty without Chinese stuff. china does
ppfriggen 1 year ago
@ppfriggen Hahahaha, more than half empty!
BeardedHoplite 1 year ago
The AK type mag release/retention is weird, though in trained hands they can reload just as quickly.
soccom8341576 1 year ago
all bullpups have a nasty triger because it is what maks it wat it is an thay are less acuret so you do need to reload faster but its not much faster than a profichent us soldier , personaly the ak's verient rifles are the best wepon chinas ever made politeck &mac90
TOUGHTRAIL 1 year ago
chances of an American-Chinese war are small because like it or not both countries are dependent on the other.
oeyesea 1 year ago 7
@oeyesea No, China depends on Australia for all its coal and iron and stuff. It doesn't depend on America at all. China manufactures SO MUCH stuff for the western world. A lot of people say "we could just move the foundries to the US" but if that happened, China could divert truckloads of labour to the military and US labour costs would skyrocket. Chinese workers cope with low pay, usually bad conditions and terrible hours. There might not be a war, but America needs China.
TheUshankaBrothers 2 months ago
@TheUshankaBrothers
Yes, they would, but the overall economy would be better off.
Ragitsu 1 month ago
0:20
Soldier: Doodoodoodo
Other guy: Shut up
Soldier: =(
MyFoodIsBad 1 year ago 50
Wonder how fast with dual-mags attachment?
swordimpulse07 7 months ago
@swordimpulse07 this isn't call of duty bro...
Lennonbacker 6 months ago
the guy told the other guy to stfu when he started humming
AznDuD333 1 year ago
Heard that the QBZ-03 is the latest model... are they planning to replace the 95 with the 03?
JBXyooj 1 year ago
@JBXyooj nope only for border guards, where training isn't as widely available will they recieve the qbz-03. cause qbz 95 requires more training. border guards have less time so they need something they are used to.
myfunkychannel 1 year ago
i like the futuristic look of the gun, especially the many right angles it has haha
XLnotsofunny 1 year ago
China will be the true cause of "2012" ...for America.
Unless we team up with Russia, Korea, Taiwan and 10+ plus countries to waste them, America is just an asset to the Chinese, however if we do, America will fail economically.Oh the irony, (I'm now brushing up on my Chinese)
My only relief that it is for Special Forces, oh wait that still is a problem. lol
Pimpzilla300 1 year ago
@Pimpzilla300 america will just fall by itself. they create a fear so create that they believe is true. eg. they believe iraq had wmd to such a degree they went to war. they believe china will start a war, that in the end it will be themselves starting the war due to this invisible fear and threat that they created.
myfunkychannel 1 year ago
@Pimpzilla300 I'm Chinese but I honestly hope America can become a better friend with China rather than inventing the unlikely fears and going into war for all the wrong reasons. Economy, healthcare, social stability and strong stable government should be the prime concerns for America right now. War will only drag your country down. I hope Obama realised that from his mid term elections. USA is definitelynot the utopia that its citizens hoped it to be.
pakjai 1 year ago 44
@pakjai obama will bring this country down.
esh325 1 year ago
@pakjai Who cares about being friends with China? They have terrible human rights records, ripoff EVERYTHING known, see their ripoff of the Russian SU-27, and frankly are only good for cheap unskilled labor. You don't need to be friends to do business, and frankly China's a big **** as it is. Check ye facts, war doesn't drag a country's economy down, in fact it does the opposite. See WWII and it's effect on the employment as it drew us out of the great depression. Morale may drop, but not econ.
matrixdude171 1 year ago
@matrixdude171 Did you say rip off of Russian SU 27? They brought the license to make them in China under the name J-11a and the upgraded ones J-11b. Their latest J-20 working prototype looks a lot more modern than the Russian designed T-50. Technology from B-2 spirit bomber, stealth paint, solid fuel for rocket propulsion, low signiture exhaust, stealth cruise missiles and some radar, satelite were passed over by the US to repay debts. War doesn't generate money and jobs for all.
pakjai 1 year ago
@matrixdude171 We sure do have a horrible human rights record, but so do you. Guantanamo Bay, bombings of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, Vietnam, the Gulf War... The list goes on and on. Hey, at least we haven't invaded any countries lately. By the way the US owes China a lot of debt.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW: Yea but we ain't gonna pay it lol...you guys are fools(we are too!) for buying our debt....
88arau 1 year ago
@88arau Your a fool for believing the US won't have to pay back the debt to China. The US doesn't necessarily have to pay back in cash, it'll have to yield to China's interests in the future. If you owe a certain amount of money to the bank, you think you won't have to pay it back?
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW: Once the world economic system collapses. The debt will be absolved, or there will be War. It is mathematically impossible for the US to pay the debt back. Our GDP barely covers the interest.
88arau 1 year ago
@88arau I'm talking about that kind of interest, I'm talking about political and economic interest. One way or another, the US is going to pay back the debt. If not in money, then in resources.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW: Ha and turn the US into a 3rd world country? It will be War. Read a history book or two. Economic Wars ALWAYS turn into physical war.
88arau 1 year ago
Comment removed
1JesseW 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@88arau The US will be paying the debt for decades, I'm not saying all at once. I'm pretty sure that if the Chinese knew that the US will not pay back the debts, they will not lend it to the US in the first place. I don't need to read a history book to know that. There are also many more nations besides China who have lent money to the US, and they all know that the US is going to have to pay back sooner or later.
1JesseW 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@88arau If the Chinese knew that the US was not going to pay them back, they would not lend them money in the first place. I don't need to read a history book to know that. By the way, don't make the hasty generalization about economic wars always turning into physical wars.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@88arau Oh yeah, by the way, you ever wonder why the US makes economic concessions to China? Your paying back your debt.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@matrixdude171 You know its hard to believe that a country that once was inhabit by intelligence and friendly people are now home of arrogant rednecks like yourself. I dont know if your noticing but the U.S. its not making much friends lately , in fact the anti american sentiments are quite strong even in your "allied states".
"You dont need to be friends to do business" Do you think that German's , French , Italians , Japanese are your friends ? Weapons wont save you from the financial crisis.
Bhethar 7 months ago
@Bhethar right.... that's why the fed was bailing out a ton of european banks? And that's why europe is talking about austerity? If you want to argue financial crisis, please just stop, because we both know everyone was hit. You don't need to be friends to do business, just look at the middle east relations. We still do business and a lot of the middle east hates us. I'd say it could be a nice and friendly world if people didn't just rip-off hard work that is put in to make new inventions.
matrixdude171 7 months ago
@pakjai: It was never meant to be a Utopia. Where did you get that information?
88arau 1 year ago
@pakjai yes im from america and i feel the same way
SuperNickyoung 1 year ago
@pakjai if it's creating fear that's something China's good at. Try protesting against the government and you'll have agents riding down your doors. The Chinese government is really fucked up right now and as money keeps pouring in it's only going to get worse. I disagree about war dragging the United States down, war can really bring up an economy. That's why the US has the biggest economy in the world. It's prolong wars like Iraq and Afghanistan that fuck things up.
FloOFy2 11 months ago
@FloOFy2 so to you, when the chinese gov is getting more money without starting wars=fucked up?
but when the american gov is getting more money (even getting the biggest economy due to this) by starting wars= a good thing?
looks who's really fucked up now lol. what's your business anyway about how the chinese gov deals with its own country. its not like china is inciting fear over the american people. that's what the US gov does.
P0L1T1C5 11 months ago
@FloOFy2 and you pretend to care about the situation in china. that the people are oppressed by their fear-mongering government. and yet you said, in the same paragraph (which i find extremely hilarious), something like that war is not bad because it stimulates the american economy.
so in other words, you're trying to take the moral high-ground about a people's oppression, while supporting american invasions of countries (which btw oppresses people too) for money.....
only in america.....
P0L1T1C5 11 months ago
@P0L1T1C5 I'm just stating the facts here....there's no reason to get offended.
I never said that the US is perfect, but the thing is we have rights, people in China don't. Try protesting about their government over there like we do everyday. I'm not saying war is good, I forget what I replied to but I'm saying that war really excels a country. The US wouldn't be were it is today if it wasn't for WWII which just boomed our economy. I don't see how you can get offended by this....
FloOFy2 11 months ago
@FloOFy2 if you dont see any hypocrisy in what you stated, then i guess that's the reason why you think there shouldnt be any reason to get offended.
remember you replied a comment from pakjai? im just wondering why im not supposed to be offended, while it seems like you were offended by what pakjai said. it's something to think about.
btw, in china, many people do protest. just search it up on youtube, even recently. tiananmen square protest happened a long time ago. be updated.
P0L1T1C5 11 months ago
@P0L1T1C5 no, I'm pretty sure I wasn't offended as I said before, just stating facts. Yes, you can protest in China, just like you can protest in Libiyia...
The only problem is that you'll get shot or arrested. And yes, I'm talking about today. The fact that if you just say "protest" over the phone in China your call would be dropped. Do some research on how much China censors their media.
FloOFy2 11 months ago
@FloOFy2 you never said you were offended before. i just felt that you were by the way you replied to him/her. and for what it's worth, i didnt get offended by what you said. it's far too normal for me now.
wait, you're saying "you can protest in china/libya" as if there are big consequences. like i said before, tiananmen was a long time ago. just do a simple search on youtube. put like "china protest feb/march 2011". none of those people were shot or arrested, otherwise, there'd be coverage.
P0L1T1C5 11 months ago
@FloOFy2 and before you say something like "there'd be no coverage because china censors everything", i want you to know that im talking about western news coverage. even tiananmen square had a huge coverage from domestic and foreign news sources.
and if you look at these youtube videos (if you search for them that is), youd see no one is getting shot or run over by a tank.
P0L1T1C5 11 months ago
@FloOFy2 oh and also Libya is doing what any country would do when there's an armed rebellion......they fight back. do you expect their soldiers to stand idle when they see rebels trying to kill them?
P0L1T1C5 11 months ago
Are you implying that Obama is a war mongering republican? You're an idiot if you think a Democrat is going to instigate with another country. Just wait til you put another Bush in office and you'll see this country at war again.
reeboki3 8 months ago
@reeboki3 um, seriously? Obama - Libya. LBJ - Vietnam. JFK - Vietnam. Truman - Korea. Roosevelt - WW2. Wilson - WW1. All Democrat presidents that opted for war. Just because someone's a Democrat doesn't mean they're a peacenik, & if someone is a Republican does not mean they're a warmonger.
GirlsGamesGunsGuitar 7 months ago 7
@GirlsGamesGunsGuitar Bush "Jr."- Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush "Sr"- Iraq/Kuwait. McKinley- Spain. Carter/Reagan - Iranian Hostage Crisis
Lincoln- Civil War
Republicans that opted war. Lincoln doesn't count, but he opted war, too.
NatedogJr 7 months ago
@pakjai obama is an idiot
class3hotbox 8 months ago
@pakjai Im italian and i totally think alike you. In the EU we dont have this "P.R. of China/Russia want to destroy us" sentiment.
In this moments the whole world is suffering for the financial crisis , the social status of western countries including USA and EU are declining dramaticatly so it would be a good time to invest in everithing but the military. Nor the P.R. of China and neither Russia will benefit of a war with the U.S.A. since they are economically dependent one from another.
Bhethar 7 months ago
beautiful gun :) much better than the lame ACR HK416 etc etc
noodow715 1 year ago
@donalolz thanks
KILLER53992 1 year ago
Crappy Chinese made one
bottomeline 1 year ago
@bottomeline yeah how bout you do the world a favor and put the QBZ to your mouth and pull the trigger how bout that
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
マガジンチェンジだけとか吹いたｗｗｗ
Roizel 1 year ago
@Roizel what that say japanese man
say china suck gay country nuke china or what
ShAdOwViRuSiAn 1 year ago
sleight of hand ... chinese style
segregator236 1 year ago
how much bullets does it hold
KILLER53992 1 year ago
The only thing wrong with this smexy gun is that they should take off the handle
cheetok1ng470 1 year ago
For Paratroop and Marines(because the space), this gun make sense. But for army,no. Also the Mag look way to close to change it fast in combat,s It's in somewhat awkward postion. Anyway the Type 03 is already in production.
pro80 1 year ago
DO NOT USE EYE!!!!!!train more,kid!
check how the others do it ! watch?v=lJ3-5sDnDVc
antiallsb 1 year ago
scar and m4 and all that shit is no match for qbz
oldhugh101 1 year ago
@oldhugh101 There's like 10 things wrong with the QBZ rifle internally because it was rushed into production.
Excalibur01 1 year ago
yeah lets see him do that in combat
huffa12 1 year ago
wow first i was like omg ugly gun.........
But it looks pretty cool actualy
wardfierst32 1 year ago
I profess to not be an expert on Chinese Military Doctrine but, last I checked most modern armed forces are moving away from dropping mags. Thus I find myself interested in the the question of how fast could this rifle be reloaded if mag dropping was forbidden.
asymmetricstudygroup 1 year ago
@asymmetricstudygroup when your being fired upon, i would think you would have more important things to think about. what's the use of saving a magazine, at the price of getting a soldier killed
myfunkychannel 1 year ago
@myfunkychannel Oh that I know. It was just so much I'm more of an advocate of the traditional system m-16/ak series/g36/ ect because you can reload it must faster, you don't have to expose half your body when aiming from the left side of a corner (assuming your right handed). I know that this is an emergency reload. Just my bias against the bullpup design.
asymmetricstudygroup 1 year ago
They better watch out for the lead paint on those rifles.
MontyPython134 1 year ago
democracy doesn't work for large population nations.
myfreshchannel 1 year ago
certainly has come a long way from the chinese AKs of the 80s. Bur how's the performance like?
AAV47 1 year ago
@AAV47 go check videos online you'll see it receives the same punishment as ak series do and yet works like its new. reliability was a key feature in the design must list for them
myfreshchannel 1 year ago
this looks like the worst imitation of the m16. i mean the desgin,why can't chinese make something without copying others? my airsoft m16 owns this..lol. chinese make their own version ak-47, mig-21 and all russian technologies and get few pennys by selling them to north korea.
chakdemumbai234 1 year ago
@chakdemumbai234 They've paid the Russians to learn about their technology dipshit!! if you hate this gun then why are you watching this video?? QBZ never copied the m16 (btw the m16 is soo out of style and its soo high recoil for a .223)!! if you know shit about this gun... dont comment!! the fucking american media effected you to believe everything made in china is bad!! they why are you wearing your fucking nike shoes!!?
Condom007of007Solace 1 year ago
@chakdemumbai234 looks nothing like an m-16, go get your biased eyes checked.
myfreshchannel 1 year ago
@chakdemumbai234
fuck off, indian
douboymk2 1 year ago
that looks like a mixture between the famas, the tar-21, the pp 2000, m16, and the aa12...not trying to sound like a cod nerd (I play more than cod) but I just wanted to know...I love bullpups and I was wondering why it looked like that. :/
Firan25 1 year ago
Why should the USA adopt a bullpup rifle when the M4 / M16 still get the job done?
Xelcient 1 year ago
@Xelcient
do u have hands on experience? if u were to put an m4 against one of todays military bullpups u would understand how obselite it really is.
SIGsogger 1 year ago
polymer..?
askmeh2h 1 year ago
With a bullpup:
triggers usually have a lot of play
weight is usually shifted towards the rear
reloading is usually less efficient
and can't shoot left handed
TitaniumBallz 1 year ago
y usa dont have bullpup rifles
another505 1 year ago
are these Chinese troops?
Faxisi 1 year ago
@Faxisi new recruits, so not yet fully trained.
goofyfacts 1 year ago
Good rifle there! I supposed the handling is the same as SAR21. How i wish I can get to shoot live rounds for type 95/ 97
up2wind 2 years ago
at 0:19, his finger is still on the trigger. Sure that magazine is unloaded, but that's a bad habit.
Anyways, I heard the safety selector is at the end of the rifle. That probably makes switching from safety to burst or automatic fire uncomfortable
Pyromaniac721 2 years ago
yeah, the selector switch of the 95 is probably the worst placed selector in the history of assault rifles.
however ive seen the prototype of the 95G and its vastly improved, selector is next to the trigger, carrying handle is lower and there are small rails next to the front sight for accessories.
fludblud 2 years ago
I heard that the PAP and support troops in the PLA use a different rifle, the QBZ-03. Has that received any good feedback?
Pyromaniac721 2 years ago
the QBZ-03 was developed because northern soldiers with taller builds found the QBZ-95 to be too compact and awkward to use. the 03 is basically the same rifle but in a conventional AK style layout so range and accuracy should be similar apart from the larger size.
its currently being produced in the same rate as the 95 and the PAP, frontline and support troops use both though which battalions use them is generally determined by geography.
its an interesting system but it seems to work
fludblud 2 years ago
I think they screwed up if they have to be issueing two different rifles to troops.
esh325 2 years ago
yeah but not many countries have such a radical height difference between north and south. northern chinese often exceed 6ft+ whilst southern chinese average about 5'2.
besides, the PLA is so massive that even with two standard weapons, each one probably has more than that of many nations' entire standard issued arsenal.
fludblud 2 years ago
same caliber and magazine, but the QBZ-03 isn't issued to frontline troops.
Honestly though, I'm biased towards the conventional layout, maybe I've been shooting AR-15's for too long, lol. It just feels more natural when doing a quick mag change in my opinion.
Pyromaniac721 2 years ago
@Pyromaniac721
QBZ03 are used by border forces today, because they are long enough to frighten border crossers(-_-!because 95 really looks like a toy) soilders can also use gunstock for beating ,it's not funny to fire in border area.
Tairant2000 1 year ago
can you share the link?
CCPJAYLPHAN1994 1 year ago
@Pyromaniac721 most bullpup first design have selector on the stock.
goofyfacts 1 year ago
america needs a bullpup rifle
AlexSaysHi2013 2 years ago 16
too bad the army is obsessed with the ar-15 design
sawyerbobby 2 years ago 2
well its a good rifle but the age is starting to get old, i hope they get the FN SCAR out quick
AlexSaysHi2013 2 years ago
the SCAR is in use,by units under USSOCOM
sawyerbobby 2 years ago
well i know rangers, airborne, and spec ops are using them, but a sure sign that they are about to change is all USMC NCOs now get M4s and since the marines always get the older equipment well you figure it out
AlexSaysHi2013 2 years ago
Think they already got bullpups, e.g. the AUG
chineseeagle123x 1 year ago
@chineseeagle123x who America? we don't use that...
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013 - I think we do have one, I forgot what it's called.
IWIUSMCIMIUSSR 1 year ago
@IWIUSMCIMIUSSR we might be trying one or testing but currently there are no bullpup American made rifles out there period
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013 wooo man!!! I cant believe it!! come to think of it America never once made a bullpup in the history of its military!! man you gave me a eureka moment XD
Condom007of007Solace 1 year ago
@Condom007of007Solace thx i though people would notice at some point lol
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013
The M16 has been with the US military for over 30 years, and is used by many military branches and law enforcement agencies around the world.
The only advantage of a bullpup is a longer barrel in a smaller profile; I have nothing against them, but the M16 is gonna stay a while.
Pyromaniac721 1 year ago
@Pyromaniac721 that simply depends on cost and social climate like whether we're goin to war or not, that's is just if we change rifle AT ALL, the M-16 right now is going strong but with the implementation of the SCAR in several units including the 101st Airborne and 5th Marines I believe, the M-16 won't be around for more that another decade...in my opinion
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013 eventually the M16 will be replaced. It's mostly because of internal politics that's why we still have them
Excalibur01 1 year ago
@Excalibur01 yeah that and cost, but they are replacing it with the FN-SCAR
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013 Tavor
JazzPr0phet 1 year ago
@JazzPr0phet the Israeli rifle? what about it?
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013
Why?
GurgleOneSixSix 1 year ago
@GurgleOneSixSix newer design, faster reload, shorter weapon, it's been sweeping the market with those and more features, many are system weapons
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013
lol ok, you probably should have said those in your first comment :v
GurgleOneSixSix 1 year ago
@GurgleOneSixSix ...face palm, most people who know about guns, and watched the video ;), should know
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013
It's youtube, mate.
GurgleOneSixSix 1 year ago
@GurgleOneSixSix yes, a place where you can post videos on any subjects, i just figured anyone watching videos on a certain subject would have a bit on knowledge on it...just sayin
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013
unfortunately, it's quite the opposite.
GurgleOneSixSix 1 year ago
@GurgleOneSixSix ...unfortunately i have to agree with you on that
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013 i agree
Akalack 1 year ago
@Akalack indeed
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013
we hav a bull pup sniper
mrlamboapollo 1 year ago
@mrlamboapollo we do?
AlexSaysHi2013 1 year ago
@AlexSaysHi2013 So true, America needs anything besides the crap M16/M4 series rifles period.
cabraden7 1 year ago
@cabraden7 well it was and still is a good solid and reliable rifle design, bit rough to start, which garnered a bad reputation, but it was still a good weapon, and just like with any other main rifle it's goin