Maybe instead of a Big Bang, it was a Big Divide? That would explain the sudden acceleration/expansion we are witnessing, our universe is just in the midst of another division. :]
That's a good way to put it. AT the big bang all the dimensions were tiny not just space but also time was infintessimal and then it "divided" into a past and future and the dimensions started spreading into this huge thing that we see as a universe... but from the outside it is probably still just a singularity with tiny dimensions and in fact some scientists say it's total energy is zero so it isn't even a singularity... it simply does not exist from outside.
I see so many correlations between the universe and cytology/biology, I look at the universe as one big "Cosmic-Cell" and everything within this Cosmic-Cell(stars, black holes, matter, dark matter) are just "Cosmic-Organelles" responsible for the cosmic-cell's functions.When I look at the baby picture of the universe I see cell division(Anaphase). We are the stuff of stars, the stars are the stuff of the universe; maybe the universe's nature/anatomy is not so different from our own? :]
I was taught that looking for a time before the big bang is like looking for a point North of the North pole. Having an origin for time/space there is consistent with evidence and current cosmological theorems and it negates the question what caused the big bang as causality implies time and if there is none then you don't need a cause.
@MsPerduta Sounds logical though you are right...there are possibilities, and they awaken new questions like...did the big bang just happen all of a sudden? or was there something sitting there for some and than it just happened...maybe energy, if it sat there, won't that mean that it has been there for a period of time? even if it did, or didn't...Did everything pop out of nothing just bam! like that?...a WHOLE universe.
I think like Hilbert's hotel it may be part of an infinite multi-verse. Universes being singularities in another universes. In each dimensions start at zero with all time and all space in one spot then they separate into a past and a future that is relative to the observer and existence there lies in the all the possibilities between the extremes.
A lot of science starts as theories. e.g. theory of relativity... string theory... it all makes sense and then people find ways of confirming it. Scientist believe our universe came from nothing and so it might be possible to make some more universes out of some spare nothing. If they do, then I hope they give them their own separate dimensions because a big bang right here on Earth might be bad for us.
Scientists and physicists tend to smell each other's farts, with each succeeding generation taking deeper breaths. As a child, my teacher had never heard of Plate Tectonics.. now viola , everyone's a genius. Gravity is simply molecular attraction, larger masses sucking in smaller ones. Astro physicists can't believe something having no beginning, so they've invented one.
The universe has always existed, moving, creating stars, galaxies, a churning mass of energy. We are all just quantum dust.
@MrSpice5 What I still want to know (and no one has been able to answer this for me yet) is if we are just "quantum dust" then what is the director behind the scenes, if you will, telling our bodies and stuff that we need 2 eyes to see depth, color etc? What tells the body that it needs skin to protect from radiation, sweat to cool off, heal when it's cut, you get the point. :) If it's not some sort of intelligence directing this, what is it? Just curious about your thoughts. Ty!
Well i guess we need hecka lot better science and hardware to devine out what was before the big bang or perhaps on the other side of it. Seeing that we cannot even detect conciusness even thought it realy plentifull on this earth(i assume). Scientist cant even find any part of the brain that could produce conciusness (yet). So i wouldnt hope for any meaning full info about before big bang. before they solve the conciusness puzzle. i know its 2 diffrent fields but it shows our tech is lacking.
Possibly the "Big Bang" Theory is correct, as stated. Perhaps millions of other "Big Bangs" occured hundreds of Trillions of Light years away, creating millions of other Universes. The light from all these Universes would only reach one another long after these Universes were created, grew, evolved and died out.
The Human Mind cannot fully comprehend infinite distances and terms like "infinity" and "eternity" are concepts our dim intellects cannot REALLY grasp. If not, why not?
as Mather said, even time and space may not be what we know of it now, when it comes to 'before' the big bang.
Even weirder than 'infinity', or thinking about many big bangs far away - there would be no 'far away', even saying it happens all in one place would be wrong without existance of space.
As you said, we cannot image such things, our brains are probably still too hardwired to get a good 3d-view from a tree, but we can use math to get some numbers for it ;)
@caruya did i say that he was a creatonist? thunderf00t has a series where he debunks creatonist and creatonists usually quote wlc, and wlc doesnt think through his own theorys that good before he publishes it on the internet...
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
@KuriapXia atleast they ask the questions religions are likely to say this is the way it is dont test or question My athor-a tay! in science they ask the question develop the theory test the theory if the math doent work they modify the theory and rinse repeat :)
@stompySharpNpointy Well although i respect your opinion, i don't necessarily agree with that stance. There are plenty of legendary scientists (Sir Isaac Newton for one), who actually started practicing and working with science with their religious views a guiding line through their work. And please people define religion, religions are not all the same nor do they all hold the same views upon the world/creation.
@KuriapXia both sides try to figure ou the the world around them..one side just seem to have a stronger opinion then the other..which side is up to you
"we don't know" was the best statement outa this clown. Look at all the INFORMATION & INTELLIGIBILITY that came out of the big-bang. The absolute fine-tuning of it as well. All this info and intelligence came from "nowhere"? I think not. There never will be a "theory of everything". I don't care how long you "work very hard at it".
.imagine the universe is like a sock it continues to exspand until it inverts inside out curving space in on itself and continues this inversion continuiosly until it inverts again and again
or maybe it did imagine a wormhole turning inside out if the universe goes through some kind of imversion it would explain the the big bang otherwise the brane theorie leaves us with a box imside a box imside a box inside a box forever you never get to the end but if the universe turns inside out and reverses its ends then we would not only get a big bang but it would be repeatable similar to big crunch but tje universe continues to exspand until it turns inside out
Just because our universe did not exist, before the Big Bang, does not mean that no other universes existed. As has been mentioned; the multiverse theory could explain things: our universe comes into being, in another universe, with seperate (and different) universal constants that make it impossible for us to make interact with the original universe.
@flyersphan111 what about it...:) string(M) theory still has holes theyre trying to fill ..how about expansion theory from what sci channel says Big bang was an incorrect name some say it should be called the Big expansion..but im dumb as hell so i dont have a clue..could be that the black holes in space are just one side of the expansion of other universes
don't say "the" "big bang" as if it was fact, it's not at all fact, it's what some clown decided to dream up and call science when it's not. Religion is not science and not everybody wants to worship your saturday morning cartoons religion.
They pretend to know and theories will always be only theories. people think for yourself those at the top only try to impress and know less than you do.
@GUARDIANOFFOR i'm ashamed about you. But more to the point, you writing comments on youtube is because of scientific knowledge being applied, and not on random guesses about the things there is no knowledge of (yet). Hopefully there are more rational people on this world than irrational, and in the end it will work out.
There was never a Big Bang. It just shows what a dope that guy is wearing the glasses. He says he doesn't know what existed before the alleged Big Bang and yet he believes in the Big Bang. How can he believe in that without 'knowing' or at least have some theories about what came before it? What an idiot.
@Planetoxo how can there be a BEFORE when the universe concists of TIME and space, ergo if the universe didnt exist, neither did TIME, and therefor no BEFORE. Your comment is flawed on this point.
However, not knowing is only a sound sceptic approach that allows more knowledge to be gained without excluding possibilities.
@Planetoxo there is a theory that points to the big bang, the expansion of space, rewind time and evenetually all the matter in the universe would be just a single point.
All of the best ideas come from people who knew how things worked from intuition and how they knew within, then using science to prove those theories. Such as Faraday who had no understanding of advanced math. I don't think we'll know the answer to everything by using physics and numbers unless we also look within.
One thing that struck nme when I was studying science is how science isn't supposed to claim to know everything as theories change all the time when new evidence is found, yet he contrdicted himself by saying they don't know and probably will never know what happened before the big bang, then claimed they will in the future.
@chesster423 I thought science provided the answer to everything as that's how I was brought up to think, but once I started studying it, the more engrossed I became in equations, the further it seemed to be taking me from the actual truth. It made me realise that math and physics probably won't give us the answer and there will still be a lot of we don't knows.
@SuzLa1 i will try to dumb it down 4 u, i'll explain before big bang 'virtual particles's' which appear into existance without a cause crashed togteher to make an explosion. see bubble theory. do u even know science little man if u did u know about virtual particle being an answer to singularty.
@MegaGangstaparadise I wish a person had replied to me whose brain was as big as their vile mouth and ego. Why run off your stupid mouth off by trying to act great, yet talking about something completely different than I was talking about?
@MegaGangstaparadise I know what I'm talking about but you don't have a clue. It's a well known fact all the great discoveries were by people whose intuition knew the answer before they proved it by using science. Such as Michael Faraday who knew little about higher mathematics. Steve Jobs on his trips to India quote: Intuition is a very powerful thing, more powerful than intellect, in my opinion. That's had a big impact on my work." The kingdom of god is within.
@SuzLa1 Allow me further dumb it down into brain dead perspectives. we know how the universe works because of physic,math,quantam mecahnics and by studying our own surrounding orbital planes. we prove through calculations that pluto,gravity,orbit,earth sphere,electrons,black holes,dark matter and more existed before we had the hubble which proved the claims. science+math=unshakable.The day am corrected by these retards is the day I read a bible. -_-
@MegaGangstaparadise I think you do need to dumb things down because you obviously don't have a clue about the real world. I don't want to read the ramblings of an idiot who calls himself MegaGangstaparadise who thinks he can pollute my inbox with his uncivilised mouth. I have studied science yet you say you hope to be as smart as scientists. I doubt if you could be, as to even pass an exam you have to answer a question properly,but your brain goes off in all directions. It's probably the pot.
The latest theory made is that a multiverse exists, where millions or billions of universes float freely in a vast vacuum of space called Hyperspace. Two of these universes, which look like giant bubbles, collided into each other forming our universe. There's one problem with the Big Bang Theory, the singularity. These modern theorists dismiss the singularity and ultimately the Big Bang Theory.
@VerseInfinitum multiverse is an hypothsis smh big bang=theory death of universe=theory. multiverse=pesdo science. please don't be naive little boy virtual particle explains it and besides a multiverse is chaos and would not allow the provable end of this universe. check-mate
@MegaGangstaparadise Little boy? My little friend, I know they're theories! I have the ability and courtesy to explain this to you. You think you know better than me about the universe? Dream on child.
@MegaGangstaparadise Little boy? My infinitesimal little friend, I know they're theories! This virtual particle you're writing about is a particle that exists for a limited time and space. The energy and momentum of a virtual particle are uncertain according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Oh and by the way Graviton are being studied by numerous quantum cosmologists and that's the first bit of evidence of a multiverse. Oh and by the way nice try, check-mate child.
@VerseInfinitum Take a sit little billy for I am about to mind-fuck you into oblivion. Firstly singulatry and quantam physics go hand in hand. secound you can't even 'prove' if dark matter or even an invisible god exist yet we can prove there billions of multiverse excuse me while a chuckle. lastly two infinite nothings collided to make a multiverse sure...lol kid don't step up to a mountain to big to climb. check-mate
@MegaGangstaparadise Quit your little child's play. One of the main reasons why the Big Bang theory is being challenged because the Singularity has not been proven. Upload a video called: Horizon -Parallel Universes (full version). This video is uploaded by SevenSevenSevenaka and try to learn why this theory makes sense silly boy! This theory is being experimented by the greatest minds in the field of quantum cosmology so shut the fuck up and get a job baby boy!
@MagnusNyborg Man needs god because we some times get in shit we cant get out of...universe works just fine without god...if you think about it religion was the ancient worlds tempt to understand the world around them but without scientific method ..like a Cave Man see lightening hit a tree or valcaino. doesnt understand it ..so he blames an unseen force (floaty dude in the sky)
@ThisLittleAddict Man needs god because we some times get in shit we cant get out of...universe works just fine without god...if you think about it religion was the ancient worlds tempt to understand the world around them but without scientific method ..like a Cave Man see lightening hit a tree or valcaino. doesnt understand it ..so he blames an unseen force (floaty dude in the sky)
Nothing happened before the big bang. This is a theory of faith. Every time contradictory evidence is provided against it, those that follow the theory make things up. Anti-matter is one example. For everything that can't be explained in our galaxy, the only explanation is that "Well an asteroid did it". Venus spinning the opposite direction on it's axis for example was explained away by an asteroid. If people worked on a new theory, maybe we would get somewhere.
Our universe was created by two pre-existing universes colliding into each other, so that's what happened before the big bang. Eventually the universe we are in will expand to the point where it collides with a neighboring universe, destroying the elderly universe pair, and that will start a baby universe by creating a new big bang. That is the cycle of life for universes.
@killhorsesallthetime The difference is he probably knows the mathematics and instrumentation to actually study physics. That and he probably has funding to actually do these studies.
I like this guy..he's coherent and talks at a normal pace-not like lots of fast talking scientists who bore me easily[they are poor teachers]. If all teachers were like this chap science would have evolved a whole lot faster !
Modern science has no answer -- nor purports to have any -- for what occurred before the big bang. Whether the universe existed in a different form (and therefore did not "begin" with the big bang) is simply beyond our present knowledge. Not knowing is not suitable warrant to insert a god, when this god cannot itself be investigated. It is more reasonable to say "we don't know".
We can't move forward with those who claim to "know" but fail to "show".
@theGroveMan "Modern science has no answer -- nor purports to have any -- for what occurred before the big bang."
True enough. But there's no shortage of hypotheses. People who don't understand how science works have a trouble distinguishing between experimental results and hypothesis. To them, it's all just "science".
Before we even get to questions about 'before the Big Bang' we have to decide whether 'before the Big Bang' is a meaningful phrase. "Before" implies an analogue for "time".
@sbergman27 I think some questions are not sensible at all to even ask. We speak of the Big Bang as a definite event in space and time, but what the theory of general relativity tells us is that it was the event that actually created space and time. It is not, therefore, possible to ask what happened before this instant in the same way we ask what happened last week, because there was no time present in which the question has a physical answer.
The universe (multiverse) = all that exists. There is nothing beyond or outside existence and if there is then it doesn't exist in this universe and therefore is completely irrelevant. :)
my theory on how the big bang happened.. one day super man was flying around then saw mother nature.. so he thought to himself i bet i can bang her at the speed of light.. then he fly down and banged her so hard a bright light went off and made new life.. (do remember this is a joke.. yes i am a religious guy.. and yes i do believe the big bang could have happened.. and yes i am a one of a kind guy)
The arrogant comments against any other form of belief voted top comments in literally all the atheist leaning videos I saw on YouTube makes me wonder just how open-minded and respectful atheists are, though I really don't wan't to generalize. There are absolutely amazing atheists I came across in various lectures but they are constantly being overshadowed by arrogant and disrespectful people who seem to set themselves as far more intelligent than anyone who chooses to believe in a Deity.
@sirLEVITSKY yes, we think people who believe in dieties and even go on to spell that with a capital 'd' in order to create the illusion of reality of that 'deity',are effectively acting like morons.not that they are necessarily stupid, but they have decided to shut off parts of their brain,take part of reality outside if rational inquiry,and then let the craziest mythology slide, accepting it as though they were morons. arrogant? hardly. arrogance is believing in nonsense and expecting respect.
@topperheartramada It is hard to take your arrogance seriously due to the ignorant mistakes you have made.
1. The closest neurological explanation is that religeous practices and anticipations make you secrete serotonin and dopamine, the complete opposite of "to shut off parts of their brain"
2. Deists don't believe in the "craziest mythology" because they are Deists, not Theists.
PS: There is nothing arrogant about having your own personal belief and expecting people to respect you.
@topperheartramada How can I be excepted to take your comments seriously when you have written them down so sloppily? There are grammatical errors throughout your comment. I might have taken your comments more seriously but I cannot because you cannot grasp the basics of your own written language. (spelling, capitalization, punctuation)
@TheJoseph4774 I don't recall vere speaking to you, or sending multimple comments, as you suggest. Nor do I take responses of the kind you just gave seriously.
@topperheartramada Even in the response you just sent, there are STILL spelling and grammar errors! You don't EVER but a comma before the word 'or', because its a conjunction. You spelled 'ever' and 'multiple' wrong. You don't have to take my comments seriously, but I can't take yours seriously either when you write like a 10 year old.
@TheJoseph4774 ok, moron. this is fucking youtube. i don't have time to check my spelling, nor do i bother to go back and restructure a sentence just so the commas would be in the right spot. and gues what, english is not my mother tongue. why do you waste everyone's time dodging discussion and complaining about the way i put a comma in the wrong spot? and another thing: it's spelled 10-year-old, asshole.
You're suppose to capitalize 'What' at the beginning of the sentence. Also, you spelled 'you' wrong. How many times do we have to do this? (notice I spelled 'you' correctly...)
The universe is THE universe, not one universe, since "one" can imply a contained entity. Such an entity, then, can have inferences for more than one, in which case it would then not be infinitely whole and hence subject to causal influences, unlike the universe itself as a whole, which cannot have causal influences as it is not
contained. It is, in other words, boundless and without time - and being devoid of these facets means that it never started, which means no creator.
@MrKGatl isn't it obvious your in breach of racism by putting flying spaghetti monster?.. i mean if you keep it up it wouldn't surprise me if you get a meeting with the police.. i mean you don't hear us making fun of you guys.. i mean i could call u guys asstheists all the time just to piss you off but i won't because some of the stuff science comes up with i believe in.. other stuff not too sure.. like the one where they said "We can freeze water with magnets".. then it didn't work..
If its possible for the universe to just pop into existence without cause and from nothing (which means the eternal can not exist) And this un-caused accident "just happened" to produce the extremely precise life necessary constants along with all the many life sustaining elements all in perfect balance for a vast array of complex intelligent life forms to exist. "Happy accidents" Hoyle calls them
What is preventing a flying spaghetti monster from just popping into existence?
is it possible that in the beginning before this hole rigmarole began that God said let their be light and thats what started the big bang and if thats true then our source has to come from a single religion that what most atheist diregard but brings in agnosticsm?
@Entertainment3210 yes, but it is more unlikely than that the big bang just happened. because now first, God has to "happen", then his miracle has to "happen", and then the big bang has to happen.\
this requires more things than just a big bang that happens out of nothing, so that is per definition more likely.
I find it fun that people go rageface over this answer, you'll have your theory of everything, someday, hopefully. What was before the big bang, well.. It's an event just beyond our common grasp, it's a biological limit.
It is always funny when someone trys to have an answer to a question they dont actully have a answer too, but give alot of information and then still have no answer.
there is NO evidence a virtual particle can suddenly expand and create entire universes is there?? i must have missed that 1 lmao...i mean after all arent we talking about where the Universe came from?? if you assert it came from a virtual particle that suddenly expanded...wheres the evidence?? this is a joke!! Also who or what designed the energy that popped into existance from Pure nothingess?? Did it design its own properties??
@vactor2222 I mean the expresion "before the big bang" is a contradicction assuming that big bang is equal to moment 0. time has origin in the expansion of the universe. if you are in A and you want to go to a point B. you must comply with the law of phisics to do so. the order in wich you have to deal with such laws is what we perceive as time. said laws, are the result of the stretching of matter in every direction. there is no time whithout mass and mass is the memory of the very big bang .
This Big Bang Theory is a whole lot of nonsense. Anyone with half a brain knows that some old guy named 'God,' who lives in Heaven, wears a white robe and sandals, and has a long white beard and magical powers, created the universe between six and ten thousand years ago simply by saying "Let there be light," etc. This same magical old guy (who also goes by the names "Jehovah" & "Yahweh") is perfect, knows everything, can do anything, & lives forever. Anyone with just half a brain believes this.
There is something called M-theory where two membranes collide together in the vastness of nothingness. When they collide a universe is formed but it's only a theory. Theortical physicist say this collide happens every one trillion years to create a universe.
I think people have the same trouble with the concept of absolute nothingness, as they do with the concept of infinity. That is, the absence of quite literally everything. No light, no darkness. Not even a void. We may never really know. You can't think 11 dimensional thoughts with a 3 dimensional brain, after all.
how is it objectively scientific to assume that God doesn't exist and that a theory will eventually be proved if we just keep looking hard enough? has it ever occured to any of you that maybe there are aspects of this universe that we can't measure with any other instrument than our soul? ah, but that's another thing you have so objectively assumed doesn't exist either... like your mother's love or that FEELING you get when you pet a kitten. just chemicals i guess... materialists are so sad
@cwross1976 lack of assumption does not make an assumption, so no gods were harmed in the process.
It is very objectively unscientific to assume untestable things exist because science DEPENDS on testable things.
But I am very happy to tell you that emotions, love and things of varying degrees of beauty are highly scientific because they are highly testable and reproducible :)
@cwross1976 I don't intend to debate, just curious. Would you be able to explain the mechanism of how is the non-material soul attached to a material body?
And do animals have souls too, or do you believe as Descartes did, that they are mindless machines.
@cwross1976 Everything is measurable except nothingness. What reason is there to believe in something you cannot see, measure, or prove? Your just wishful thinking. It's okay to say "I'm not sure how the universe began." You just can't accept that you don't know so you jump to the first possibility. Yes, it's possible for a god to exist BUT it's even more probable for Unicorns, fairies, dragons, and leprechauns instead of your god.
I agree, but just wanted to point out that "unicorns, fairies, dragons and leprechauns" are not necessarily more probable than a god. They are for all intents and purposes equally improbable.
@marchingwarrior No, It's more probable to have dragons(who can breath fire and are huge), unicorns (all it is is a horse with a horn) fairies (that can fly, and have naturalist magic like growing plants) and leprechauns (that have a pot of gold and are green and short). Then a god who can do ANYTHING, knows everything, can create everything, and has lived forever. Also, that he loves everything. Oh yea, Sense the dawn of man. Approx. 100 billion people were born. You know how many died as kids?
@marchingwarrior Nice spotting here, except "unicorns, (maybe not fairies) but dragons and leprechauns" are much less probable than a god. For one these 'make-belief' creatures are generally considered visible beings, however a god is not necessarily bound by our visual senses. So actually no, not 'equally' improbable. Almost definitely improbable in terms of historical evidence for fairy creatures but I wouldn't jump to put 'fairy things' in the basket with gods, particularly the Christian God.
@icewomen881 You obviously have no understanding of the scientific subjects that your are criticizing(for example saying that just because puppies look the same as their birth mother, disproves evolution). It would be impossible to educate you with a YouTube msg, so please go and study the subject with great energy and zeal and come back to us for an informed discussion.
(sigh) there is nothing before time, as there is nothing north of the north pole. The "beginning" is a feature of the universe, not a transition between two things.
How can there be a "before the big bang" when time (and space) is in a collapsed state? Didn't Einstein show that time is infinitely elastic? And doesn't that mean that when the universe collapses in on itself past, present and future can are reduced to a single point?
This is what caused the big bang, you will have to remember what happened 13.72 billion years ago to understand the video: Remember - God, light and the Big Bang: /watch?v=6L2oxoagQbM
@icewomen881 Evolution has lots of evidence; go talk to a biologist. I don't know what your religious views are but god is unnecessary to light the blue touch paper to set the universe going.
@FallofDarkness55 Why do YOU believe evolution? show me some evidence. How can life come from none life ? Evolution is a religion. The big bang says something came from nothing.WOAH . that is a religion that takes faith & so does evolution. when have we seen a dog give off offspring that was not a dog.NEVER.The world has so much evidence of design. the tide goes in the tide goes out the sun comes up the sun goes down ...there are tons of symbiotic relationships in animals. which came first ?
@icewomen881 It's a catagorical error to confuse subjective belief systems with objective data. If you choose to use the word belief', this implies a position that requires neither evidence nor method of testability. Introducing an agency of doubt for the validity of perception leaves both sides of the argument without scope, but maintains each position. "read above" doesn't cut it I'm afraid.
"What happened before the big bang?"
.... Ummmmm..... 42... bye!
YouNewb100 3 days ago
So basically...you haven't got a fucking clue!
MrEDDFire 4 days ago 2
@MrEDDFire do you?
Neshuah1 22 hours ago
@Neshuah1 No, thats why i came to this video you fucking idiot!
MrEDDFire 22 hours ago
@MrEDDFire if u dont have a clue, why do u curse scientists for not having a clue?
Neshuah1 20 hours ago
Maybe instead of a Big Bang, it was a Big Divide? That would explain the sudden acceleration/expansion we are witnessing, our universe is just in the midst of another division. :]
Nez949 1 week ago
@Nez949
That's a good way to put it. AT the big bang all the dimensions were tiny not just space but also time was infintessimal and then it "divided" into a past and future and the dimensions started spreading into this huge thing that we see as a universe... but from the outside it is probably still just a singularity with tiny dimensions and in fact some scientists say it's total energy is zero so it isn't even a singularity... it simply does not exist from outside.
MsPerduta 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I see so many correlations between the universe and cytology/biology, I look at the universe as one big "Cosmic-Cell" and everything within this Cosmic-Cell(stars, black holes, matter, dark matter) are just "Cosmic-Organelles" responsible for the cosmic-cell's functions.When I look at the baby picture of the universe I see cell division(Anaphase). We are the stuff of stars, the stars are the stuff of the universe; maybe the universe's nature/anatomy is not so different from our own? :]
Nez949 1 week ago
Scientist says, "I don't know, but we're working on it."
Theist says, "They don't know, therefore God."
ilovelani69 1 week ago 7
@ilovelani69 so true.
sniped101 5 days ago
The big bang is where time and space came into existence.
There is nothing before the big bang as there was no time there for it to be in.
MsPerduta 1 week ago
@MsPerduta But...just wondering, how do you know that there was no time?
AmountainLion3 1 week ago
@AmountainLion3
There are indeed alternative possibilities.
I was taught that looking for a time before the big bang is like looking for a point North of the North pole. Having an origin for time/space there is consistent with evidence and current cosmological theorems and it negates the question what caused the big bang as causality implies time and if there is none then you don't need a cause.
MsPerduta 1 week ago
@MsPerduta Sounds logical though you are right...there are possibilities, and they awaken new questions like...did the big bang just happen all of a sudden? or was there something sitting there for some and than it just happened...maybe energy, if it sat there, won't that mean that it has been there for a period of time? even if it did, or didn't...Did everything pop out of nothing just bam! like that?...a WHOLE universe.
AmountainLion3 1 week ago
@AmountainLion3
I think like Hilbert's hotel it may be part of an infinite multi-verse. Universes being singularities in another universes. In each dimensions start at zero with all time and all space in one spot then they separate into a past and a future that is relative to the observer and existence there lies in the all the possibilities between the extremes.
MsPerduta 1 week ago
@MsPerduta A nice possibility again...though, whatever the answer is, it is truly sad that it'll probably be staying as mere theories.
AmountainLion3 1 week ago
@AmountainLion3
A lot of science starts as theories. e.g. theory of relativity... string theory... it all makes sense and then people find ways of confirming it. Scientist believe our universe came from nothing and so it might be possible to make some more universes out of some spare nothing. If they do, then I hope they give them their own separate dimensions because a big bang right here on Earth might be bad for us.
MsPerduta 1 week ago
@AmountainLion3 Mere theories?? Something tells me that you have no idea what a scientific theory is.
atheistram 4 days ago
We live in an impossible universe trying to find an impossible answer.
abortion4life666 1 week ago
As per the principal of "Primum Movens"...it was GOD
PartyAllSeason 1 week ago
GOD
PartyAllSeason 1 week ago
the answer: magic
TheLongliveme 2 weeks ago
Scientists and physicists tend to smell each other's farts, with each succeeding generation taking deeper breaths. As a child, my teacher had never heard of Plate Tectonics.. now viola , everyone's a genius. Gravity is simply molecular attraction, larger masses sucking in smaller ones. Astro physicists can't believe something having no beginning, so they've invented one.
The universe has always existed, moving, creating stars, galaxies, a churning mass of energy. We are all just quantum dust.
MrSpice5 3 weeks ago
@MrSpice5 What I still want to know (and no one has been able to answer this for me yet) is if we are just "quantum dust" then what is the director behind the scenes, if you will, telling our bodies and stuff that we need 2 eyes to see depth, color etc? What tells the body that it needs skin to protect from radiation, sweat to cool off, heal when it's cut, you get the point. :) If it's not some sort of intelligence directing this, what is it? Just curious about your thoughts. Ty!
moguy200979 2 weeks ago
@MrSpice5 I didn't have room to add: One of my favorite quotes is "Matter cannot arrange itself nor can blueprints draw themselves."
moguy200979 2 weeks ago
Well i guess we need hecka lot better science and hardware to devine out what was before the big bang or perhaps on the other side of it. Seeing that we cannot even detect conciusness even thought it realy plentifull on this earth(i assume). Scientist cant even find any part of the brain that could produce conciusness (yet). So i wouldnt hope for any meaning full info about before big bang. before they solve the conciusness puzzle. i know its 2 diffrent fields but it shows our tech is lacking.
Jonzen77 3 weeks ago
Possibly the "Big Bang" Theory is correct, as stated. Perhaps millions of other "Big Bangs" occured hundreds of Trillions of Light years away, creating millions of other Universes. The light from all these Universes would only reach one another long after these Universes were created, grew, evolved and died out.
The Human Mind cannot fully comprehend infinite distances and terms like "infinity" and "eternity" are concepts our dim intellects cannot REALLY grasp. If not, why not?
randy95023 1 month ago
@randy95023
as Mather said, even time and space may not be what we know of it now, when it comes to 'before' the big bang.
Even weirder than 'infinity', or thinking about many big bangs far away - there would be no 'far away', even saying it happens all in one place would be wrong without existance of space.
As you said, we cannot image such things, our brains are probably still too hardwired to get a good 3d-view from a tree, but we can use math to get some numbers for it ;)
Radonatos 3 weeks ago
What happened before the big bang?
....The great foreplay, of course.
juxmook 1 month ago 7
@juxmook What happened afterwards? The mass clean up, of course.
gavrokk 1 month ago
@juxmook wow! you're so unoriginal...
gago12335 4 days ago
"I dont know what happened befor the big bang and probably no one will ever know
bla bla bla bla bla"
plazma1 1 month ago
@plazma1 is that all that you got from john mathers answer?
your a dumb fuck!!!
GiancarloP93 1 month ago
I feel like my brain melted and it's currently dripping out of my ears.
farnium 1 month ago
@farnium ...why?
CrazySauce91911 1 month ago
This man needs to spend some time learning from Dr Craig.
lukose2007 1 month ago
@lukose2007 william lane craig doesnt know what he is talking about, search why people laugh at creatonists william lane craig.
johauHAU 1 month ago
@johauHAU WLC is not a creationist, again study your rivals, otherwise you sound ignorant.
caruya 1 month ago
@caruya did i say that he was a creatonist? thunderf00t has a series where he debunks creatonist and creatonists usually quote wlc, and wlc doesnt think through his own theorys that good before he publishes it on the internet...
johauHAU 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is an invitation to see an artist theory on the physics of light and time!
This theory is based on two postulates
1. Is that the quantum wave particle function Ψ represents the forward passage of time ∆E ∆t ≥ h/2π itself
2. Is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle ∆×∆p×≥h/4π that is formed by the w- function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event that we can interact with turning the possible into the actual!
nickharvey7 1 month ago
When this and when that bla bla bla, are these the people that we should put our trust in?
Believing in "maybe" or "one day if we'll find out" is a waste of time.
KuriapXia 1 month ago
@KuriapXia atleast they ask the questions religions are likely to say this is the way it is dont test or question My athor-a tay! in science they ask the question develop the theory test the theory if the math doent work they modify the theory and rinse repeat :)
stompySharpNpointy 1 month ago
@stompySharpNpointy Well although i respect your opinion, i don't necessarily agree with that stance. There are plenty of legendary scientists (Sir Isaac Newton for one), who actually started practicing and working with science with their religious views a guiding line through their work. And please people define religion, religions are not all the same nor do they all hold the same views upon the world/creation.
KuriapXia 1 month ago
@KuriapXia both sides try to figure ou the the world around them..one side just seem to have a stronger opinion then the other..which side is up to you
stompySharpNpointy 1 month ago
"we don't know" was the best statement outa this clown. Look at all the INFORMATION & INTELLIGIBILITY that came out of the big-bang. The absolute fine-tuning of it as well. All this info and intelligence came from "nowhere"? I think not. There never will be a "theory of everything". I don't care how long you "work very hard at it".
bheadh 2 months ago
Those frames are huge.
Rob02150 2 months ago
the girl behind that guy is fucking hot!
wildanS 2 months ago
as it loses energy it may exspand less with less matter over time and ultimitly contract into a plank scale once ita energy is gone
Lok783 2 months ago
.imagine the universe is like a sock it continues to exspand until it inverts inside out curving space in on itself and continues this inversion continuiosly until it inverts again and again
Lok783 2 months ago
or maybe it did imagine a wormhole turning inside out if the universe goes through some kind of imversion it would explain the the big bang otherwise the brane theorie leaves us with a box imside a box imside a box inside a box forever you never get to the end but if the universe turns inside out and reverses its ends then we would not only get a big bang but it would be repeatable similar to big crunch but tje universe continues to exspand until it turns inside out
Lok783 2 months ago
Just because our universe did not exist, before the Big Bang, does not mean that no other universes existed. As has been mentioned; the multiverse theory could explain things: our universe comes into being, in another universe, with seperate (and different) universal constants that make it impossible for us to make interact with the original universe.
dave5158 2 months ago
there was no "before" technically from what many think
stompySharpNpointy 2 months ago
@stompySharpNpointy What about multiverse?
flyersphan111 2 months ago
@flyersphan111 what about it...:) string(M) theory still has holes theyre trying to fill ..how about expansion theory from what sci channel says Big bang was an incorrect name some say it should be called the Big expansion..but im dumb as hell so i dont have a clue..could be that the black holes in space are just one side of the expansion of other universes
stompySharpNpointy 2 months ago
This may be a clue to how the universe formed in its early stages
Lok783 2 months ago
A good question is to ask where all the super central black holes came from that attracted stars into spiral galaxies
Lok783 2 months ago
He looks like a skinnier version of Chirstopher Walken!
Bastiat90 2 months ago
don't say "the" "big bang" as if it was fact, it's not at all fact, it's what some clown decided to dream up and call science when it's not. Religion is not science and not everybody wants to worship your saturday morning cartoons religion.
PanzerBlitz43 2 months ago
They pretend to know and theories will always be only theories. people think for yourself those at the top only try to impress and know less than you do.
2Crystalight 2 months ago
@GUARDIANOFFOR My soul got saved and is going to heaven because of the big bang.
The big bang has given me eternal life as I am a member of the big bang tribe.
mentalphysicalism 2 months ago
@GUARDIANOFFOR i'm ashamed about you. But more to the point, you writing comments on youtube is because of scientific knowledge being applied, and not on random guesses about the things there is no knowledge of (yet). Hopefully there are more rational people on this world than irrational, and in the end it will work out.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
There was never a Big Bang. It just shows what a dope that guy is wearing the glasses. He says he doesn't know what existed before the alleged Big Bang and yet he believes in the Big Bang. How can he believe in that without 'knowing' or at least have some theories about what came before it? What an idiot.
Planetoxo 3 months ago
@Planetoxo how can there be a BEFORE when the universe concists of TIME and space, ergo if the universe didnt exist, neither did TIME, and therefor no BEFORE. Your comment is flawed on this point.
However, not knowing is only a sound sceptic approach that allows more knowledge to be gained without excluding possibilities.
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@Planetoxo there is a theory that points to the big bang, the expansion of space, rewind time and evenetually all the matter in the universe would be just a single point.
C0d4rapist 2 months ago
@C0d4rapist Only because there is a reduction in frequency over distance. Terrible theory.
m1aws 2 months ago
omg can we just say that the big bang was a JIANT fart and move on....
J2D2360waves 3 months ago
All of the best ideas come from people who knew how things worked from intuition and how they knew within, then using science to prove those theories. Such as Faraday who had no understanding of advanced math. I don't think we'll know the answer to everything by using physics and numbers unless we also look within.
SuzLa1 3 months ago
One thing that struck nme when I was studying science is how science isn't supposed to claim to know everything as theories change all the time when new evidence is found, yet he contrdicted himself by saying they don't know and probably will never know what happened before the big bang, then claimed they will in the future.
SuzLa1 3 months ago
@SuzLa1 I think neuroscience will find correlations of physical and mental
events but neuroscience will never explain the mind. The mind and the brain
are different experiences of different aspects of the one brain/mind.
mentalphysicalism 2 months ago
i really hope i can be as smart as scientists.. im starving for the truth...
chesster423 3 months ago
@chesster423 I thought science provided the answer to everything as that's how I was brought up to think, but once I started studying it, the more engrossed I became in equations, the further it seemed to be taking me from the actual truth. It made me realise that math and physics probably won't give us the answer and there will still be a lot of we don't knows.
SuzLa1 3 months ago
@SuzLa1
it requires diligence.
chesster423 3 months ago
@SuzLa1 i will try to dumb it down 4 u, i'll explain before big bang 'virtual particles's' which appear into existance without a cause crashed togteher to make an explosion. see bubble theory. do u even know science little man if u did u know about virtual particle being an answer to singularty.
MegaGangstaparadise 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise I wish a person had replied to me whose brain was as big as their vile mouth and ego. Why run off your stupid mouth off by trying to act great, yet talking about something completely different than I was talking about?
SuzLa1 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise I know what I'm talking about but you don't have a clue. It's a well known fact all the great discoveries were by people whose intuition knew the answer before they proved it by using science. Such as Michael Faraday who knew little about higher mathematics. Steve Jobs on his trips to India quote: Intuition is a very powerful thing, more powerful than intellect, in my opinion. That's had a big impact on my work." The kingdom of god is within.
SuzLa1 3 months ago
@SuzLa1 Allow me further dumb it down into brain dead perspectives. we know how the universe works because of physic,math,quantam mecahnics and by studying our own surrounding orbital planes. we prove through calculations that pluto,gravity,orbit,earth sphere,electrons,black holes,dark matter and more existed before we had the hubble which proved the claims. science+math=unshakable.The day am corrected by these retards is the day I read a bible. -_-
MegaGangstaparadise 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise I think you do need to dumb things down because you obviously don't have a clue about the real world. I don't want to read the ramblings of an idiot who calls himself MegaGangstaparadise who thinks he can pollute my inbox with his uncivilised mouth. I have studied science yet you say you hope to be as smart as scientists. I doubt if you could be, as to even pass an exam you have to answer a question properly,but your brain goes off in all directions. It's probably the pot.
SuzLa1 3 months ago
The latest theory made is that a multiverse exists, where millions or billions of universes float freely in a vast vacuum of space called Hyperspace. Two of these universes, which look like giant bubbles, collided into each other forming our universe. There's one problem with the Big Bang Theory, the singularity. These modern theorists dismiss the singularity and ultimately the Big Bang Theory.
VerseInfinitum 3 months ago
@VerseInfinitum multiverse is an hypothsis smh big bang=theory death of universe=theory. multiverse=pesdo science. please don't be naive little boy virtual particle explains it and besides a multiverse is chaos and would not allow the provable end of this universe. check-mate
MegaGangstaparadise 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise Little boy? My little friend, I know they're theories! I have the ability and courtesy to explain this to you. You think you know better than me about the universe? Dream on child.
VerseInfinitum 3 months ago
Comment removed
VerseInfinitum 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise Little boy? My infinitesimal little friend, I know they're theories! This virtual particle you're writing about is a particle that exists for a limited time and space. The energy and momentum of a virtual particle are uncertain according to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Oh and by the way Graviton are being studied by numerous quantum cosmologists and that's the first bit of evidence of a multiverse. Oh and by the way nice try, check-mate child.
VerseInfinitum 3 months ago
@VerseInfinitum Take a sit little billy for I am about to mind-fuck you into oblivion. Firstly singulatry and quantam physics go hand in hand. secound you can't even 'prove' if dark matter or even an invisible god exist yet we can prove there billions of multiverse excuse me while a chuckle. lastly two infinite nothings collided to make a multiverse sure...lol kid don't step up to a mountain to big to climb. check-mate
MegaGangstaparadise 3 months ago
Comment removed
VerseInfinitum 3 months ago
@MegaGangstaparadise Quit your little child's play. One of the main reasons why the Big Bang theory is being challenged because the Singularity has not been proven. Upload a video called: Horizon -Parallel Universes (full version). This video is uploaded by SevenSevenSevenaka and try to learn why this theory makes sense silly boy! This theory is being experimented by the greatest minds in the field of quantum cosmology so shut the fuck up and get a job baby boy!
VerseInfinitum 3 months ago
Utilize all of the known facts and it only points to God
fhansro3X 3 months ago
@fhansro3X and would that include utilising all of the know facts about god too? :)
You statement is sweeping and misguided, primarily because you would need to know all of the known facts to suggest that they point to anything.
RiderTide 3 months ago
@fhansro3X wich facts about god? Where are the evidence?
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg There is no evidence, because God lives outside of space and time.
ThisLittleAddict 2 months ago
@ThisLittleAddict "There is no evidence"
Honest at least. But how convenient that things that doesnt exist, also have no evidence for existing. And are all religions and gods equally true?
MagnusNyborg 2 months ago
@MagnusNyborg Man needs god because we some times get in shit we cant get out of...universe works just fine without god...if you think about it religion was the ancient worlds tempt to understand the world around them but without scientific method ..like a Cave Man see lightening hit a tree or valcaino. doesnt understand it ..so he blames an unseen force (floaty dude in the sky)
stompySharpNpointy 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThisLittleAddict Man needs god because we some times get in shit we cant get out of...universe works just fine without god...if you think about it religion was the ancient worlds tempt to understand the world around them but without scientific method ..like a Cave Man see lightening hit a tree or valcaino. doesnt understand it ..so he blames an unseen force (floaty dude in the sky)
stompySharpNpointy 2 months ago
Nothing happened before the big bang. This is a theory of faith. Every time contradictory evidence is provided against it, those that follow the theory make things up. Anti-matter is one example. For everything that can't be explained in our galaxy, the only explanation is that "Well an asteroid did it". Venus spinning the opposite direction on it's axis for example was explained away by an asteroid. If people worked on a new theory, maybe we would get somewhere.
jbourg333 3 months ago
At the moment, it seems all theories on the big-bang, require there to be particles in existence, in some state. Where did they come from?
wanderinggibbon 3 months ago
u sexy the first dude at the beginning sexy
weirdbookwrom 3 months ago
u sexy
weirdbookwrom 3 months ago
The bug bang was the release if energy from a vacuum fluctuation
migitraper 3 months ago
Comment removed
No1warp9 3 months ago
Our universe was created by two pre-existing universes colliding into each other, so that's what happened before the big bang. Eventually the universe we are in will expand to the point where it collides with a neighboring universe, destroying the elderly universe pair, and that will start a baby universe by creating a new big bang. That is the cycle of life for universes.
TheChickenMoneyKing 3 months ago
@TheChickenMoneyKing Multi-verse THEORY.
Emphasize added. Don't act like things are true if they have not been proven yet.
TeamApparition 3 months ago
God damn it. Does this shit have to do with string theory and what the fuck is the theory of everything? I am very goddamn confused.
alecghost 3 months ago
Thanks for knowing just as much as me mister scientist man.....
killhorsesallthetime 3 months ago
@killhorsesallthetime The difference is he probably knows the mathematics and instrumentation to actually study physics. That and he probably has funding to actually do these studies.
Brom24 3 months ago
Lol scientists are a joke.
killhorsesallthetime 3 months ago
I like this guy..he's coherent and talks at a normal pace-not like lots of fast talking scientists who bore me easily[they are poor teachers]. If all teachers were like this chap science would have evolved a whole lot faster !
brindow1 3 months ago
does he wear lipstick?
Derekdejongevanzwijn 3 months ago
Comment removed
Derekdejongevanzwijn 3 months ago
Popular question and the popular and the obvious answer "I don't know". Stop there! You simply do not know! Period.
10is1000 3 months ago
Popular question and the popular and the obvious answer "I don't know". Stop there! You simply do not know! Period.
10is1000 3 months ago
That professor dude looks like that creepy guy that are in love with selena gomez and makes videos about it.
/watch?v=KllCZGNDTuk
BoneFlameProductions 3 months ago
Modern science has no answer -- nor purports to have any -- for what occurred before the big bang. Whether the universe existed in a different form (and therefore did not "begin" with the big bang) is simply beyond our present knowledge. Not knowing is not suitable warrant to insert a god, when this god cannot itself be investigated. It is more reasonable to say "we don't know".
We can't move forward with those who claim to "know" but fail to "show".
theGroveMan 3 months ago
@theGroveMan "Modern science has no answer -- nor purports to have any -- for what occurred before the big bang."
True enough. But there's no shortage of hypotheses. People who don't understand how science works have a trouble distinguishing between experimental results and hypothesis. To them, it's all just "science".
Before we even get to questions about 'before the Big Bang' we have to decide whether 'before the Big Bang' is a meaningful phrase. "Before" implies an analogue for "time".
sbergman27 3 months ago
@sbergman27 I think some questions are not sensible at all to even ask. We speak of the Big Bang as a definite event in space and time, but what the theory of general relativity tells us is that it was the event that actually created space and time. It is not, therefore, possible to ask what happened before this instant in the same way we ask what happened last week, because there was no time present in which the question has a physical answer.
theGroveMan 3 months ago
I has it on good authority from Bill O'Reilly that God came before.
I'll get my coat.
GuillemotWatcher 3 months ago
High energy release something had to bind or store the energy it didn't come from nothing
13sam31 4 months ago
The universe (multiverse) = all that exists. There is nothing beyond or outside existence and if there is then it doesn't exist in this universe and therefore is completely irrelevant. :)
ptij0404 4 months ago
Before the big-bang? Easy! So simple! Before the big-bang was the dynamite prepared by somebody. That's it! LOL
bonjoo2010 4 months ago
Invalid question. Time was created by the BB, so there was no "before".
csmcmillion 4 months ago
my theory on how the big bang happened.. one day super man was flying around then saw mother nature.. so he thought to himself i bet i can bang her at the speed of light.. then he fly down and banged her so hard a bright light went off and made new life.. (do remember this is a joke.. yes i am a religious guy.. and yes i do believe the big bang could have happened.. and yes i am a one of a kind guy)
LeviathanTank 4 months ago
The arrogant comments against any other form of belief voted top comments in literally all the atheist leaning videos I saw on YouTube makes me wonder just how open-minded and respectful atheists are, though I really don't wan't to generalize. There are absolutely amazing atheists I came across in various lectures but they are constantly being overshadowed by arrogant and disrespectful people who seem to set themselves as far more intelligent than anyone who chooses to believe in a Deity.
sirLEVITSKY 4 months ago
@sirLEVITSKY yes, we think people who believe in dieties and even go on to spell that with a capital 'd' in order to create the illusion of reality of that 'deity',are effectively acting like morons.not that they are necessarily stupid, but they have decided to shut off parts of their brain,take part of reality outside if rational inquiry,and then let the craziest mythology slide, accepting it as though they were morons. arrogant? hardly. arrogance is believing in nonsense and expecting respect.
topperheartramada 4 months ago
@topperheartramada It is hard to take your arrogance seriously due to the ignorant mistakes you have made.
1. The closest neurological explanation is that religeous practices and anticipations make you secrete serotonin and dopamine, the complete opposite of "to shut off parts of their brain"
2. Deists don't believe in the "craziest mythology" because they are Deists, not Theists.
PS: There is nothing arrogant about having your own personal belief and expecting people to respect you.
sirLEVITSKY 4 months ago
@topperheartramada How can I be excepted to take your comments seriously when you have written them down so sloppily? There are grammatical errors throughout your comment. I might have taken your comments more seriously but I cannot because you cannot grasp the basics of your own written language. (spelling, capitalization, punctuation)
TheJoseph4774 4 months ago
@TheJoseph4774 I don't recall vere speaking to you, or sending multimple comments, as you suggest. Nor do I take responses of the kind you just gave seriously.
topperheartramada 4 months ago
@topperheartramada Even in the response you just sent, there are STILL spelling and grammar errors! You don't EVER but a comma before the word 'or', because its a conjunction. You spelled 'ever' and 'multiple' wrong. You don't have to take my comments seriously, but I can't take yours seriously either when you write like a 10 year old.
TheJoseph4774 4 months ago
@TheJoseph4774 ok, moron. this is fucking youtube. i don't have time to check my spelling, nor do i bother to go back and restructure a sentence just so the commas would be in the right spot. and gues what, english is not my mother tongue. why do you waste everyone's time dodging discussion and complaining about the way i put a comma in the wrong spot? and another thing: it's spelled 10-year-old, asshole.
topperheartramada 4 months ago
@topperheartramada
There are even MORE mistakes in that reply. Dude, you suck.
TheJoseph4774 4 months ago
@TheJoseph4774 what mental illness do yuo suffer from?
topperheartramada 4 months ago
@topperheartramada
You're suppose to capitalize 'What' at the beginning of the sentence. Also, you spelled 'you' wrong. How many times do we have to do this? (notice I spelled 'you' correctly...)
TheJoseph4774 4 months ago
@TheJoseph4774 lol
redplague 4 months ago
The universe is THE universe, not one universe, since "one" can imply a contained entity. Such an entity, then, can have inferences for more than one, in which case it would then not be infinitely whole and hence subject to causal influences, unlike the universe itself as a whole, which cannot have causal influences as it is not
contained. It is, in other words, boundless and without time - and being devoid of these facets means that it never started, which means no creator.
Meshwork123 4 months ago
When are these stupid scientists just going to realize that God did it?
devourerofbabies 4 months ago
@devourerofbabies Exactly, isnt it ovbious that the Flying Spaghetti Monster did it
MrKGatl 4 months ago
@MrKGatl isn't it obvious your in breach of racism by putting flying spaghetti monster?.. i mean if you keep it up it wouldn't surprise me if you get a meeting with the police.. i mean you don't hear us making fun of you guys.. i mean i could call u guys asstheists all the time just to piss you off but i won't because some of the stuff science comes up with i believe in.. other stuff not too sure.. like the one where they said "We can freeze water with magnets".. then it didn't work..
LeviathanTank 4 months ago
Upon further thought with my luck the anthropic principle will kick in while I'm driving and Ill hit one of them.
I bet I could get a good insurance rate
toobsucker 4 months ago
I have a question
If its possible for the universe to just pop into existence without cause and from nothing (which means the eternal can not exist) And this un-caused accident "just happened" to produce the extremely precise life necessary constants along with all the many life sustaining elements all in perfect balance for a vast array of complex intelligent life forms to exist. "Happy accidents" Hoyle calls them
What is preventing a flying spaghetti monster from just popping into existence?
toobsucker 4 months ago
@toobsucker watch?v=mmI0Xo3VXKc
SlimeAmTheBest 4 months ago
Close the Bible and be yourself...
dahlusion 5 months ago
Space is just one big experiment in some type of being's laboratory. Maybe there is a secret door that leads to it :)
jjmillr420 5 months ago
Atheist: "it's undefined what happened before the Big Bang. You cannot ask who created the Singularity."
Theist: "it's undefined what happened before God. You cannot ask who created God."
What bunch of stupid religionist idiots!
fatfist 5 months ago
@fatfist it's interesting, but what are you?
owenivor 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You'd think they could get someone with a little more credibility than John Mather, with his fraudulently obtained Nobel Prize and all.
theabiotictheory 5 months ago
there was no before the big bang. time did not start until the big bang.
MrTsquared88 5 months ago
WHEN TIME BEGINS AT THE MOMENT OF THE BIG BANG, THERE IS NO 'BEFORE'.
Maartenn100 5 months ago
is it possible that in the beginning before this hole rigmarole began that God said let their be light and thats what started the big bang and if thats true then our source has to come from a single religion that what most atheist diregard but brings in agnosticsm?
Entertainment3210 5 months ago
@Entertainment3210 yes, but it is more unlikely than that the big bang just happened. because now first, God has to "happen", then his miracle has to "happen", and then the big bang has to happen.\
this requires more things than just a big bang that happens out of nothing, so that is per definition more likely.
wubs23 5 months ago
to not have an answer and admiting it is not a problem in and of itself.
to claim to have all the answers is what is always questionable.
that is where all religious people fail !!
rouzbehazshab 5 months ago
I find it fun that people go rageface over this answer, you'll have your theory of everything, someday, hopefully. What was before the big bang, well.. It's an event just beyond our common grasp, it's a biological limit.
TheOglibogli 5 months ago
It is always funny when someone trys to have an answer to a question they dont actully have a answer too, but give alot of information and then still have no answer.
aaronstately 5 months ago
there is NO evidence a virtual particle can suddenly expand and create entire universes is there?? i must have missed that 1 lmao...i mean after all arent we talking about where the Universe came from?? if you assert it came from a virtual particle that suddenly expanded...wheres the evidence?? this is a joke!! Also who or what designed the energy that popped into existance from Pure nothingess?? Did it design its own properties??
fivethirty 5 months ago
nothing happened before the big bang simply because there was no time before the big bang...
gairero 5 months ago
@gairero do u mean nothing existed before the big bang and law of physic does not even appy
vactor2222 5 months ago
@vactor2222 I mean the expresion "before the big bang" is a contradicction assuming that big bang is equal to moment 0. time has origin in the expansion of the universe. if you are in A and you want to go to a point B. you must comply with the law of phisics to do so. the order in wich you have to deal with such laws is what we perceive as time. said laws, are the result of the stretching of matter in every direction. there is no time whithout mass and mass is the memory of the very big bang .
gairero 5 months ago
This Big Bang Theory is a whole lot of nonsense. Anyone with half a brain knows that some old guy named 'God,' who lives in Heaven, wears a white robe and sandals, and has a long white beard and magical powers, created the universe between six and ten thousand years ago simply by saying "Let there be light," etc. This same magical old guy (who also goes by the names "Jehovah" & "Yahweh") is perfect, knows everything, can do anything, & lives forever. Anyone with just half a brain believes this.
TheGreatGorkowski 6 months ago 4
There is something called M-theory where two membranes collide together in the vastness of nothingness. When they collide a universe is formed but it's only a theory. Theortical physicist say this collide happens every one trillion years to create a universe.
killerkel007 6 months ago
@killerkel007 Membranes of what?
UltraEpicLoser 6 months ago
I think people have the same trouble with the concept of absolute nothingness, as they do with the concept of infinity. That is, the absence of quite literally everything. No light, no darkness. Not even a void. We may never really know. You can't think 11 dimensional thoughts with a 3 dimensional brain, after all.
louiswu2 6 months ago
Why do creationtards always have to troll every single video that remotely contradicts their Bible?
LolChickenPie 6 months ago
how is it objectively scientific to assume that God doesn't exist and that a theory will eventually be proved if we just keep looking hard enough? has it ever occured to any of you that maybe there are aspects of this universe that we can't measure with any other instrument than our soul? ah, but that's another thing you have so objectively assumed doesn't exist either... like your mother's love or that FEELING you get when you pet a kitten. just chemicals i guess... materialists are so sad
cwross1976 6 months ago
@cwross1976 lack of assumption does not make an assumption, so no gods were harmed in the process.
It is very objectively unscientific to assume untestable things exist because science DEPENDS on testable things.
But I am very happy to tell you that emotions, love and things of varying degrees of beauty are highly scientific because they are highly testable and reproducible :)
HRage 6 months ago
@cwross1976 I don't intend to debate, just curious. Would you be able to explain the mechanism of how is the non-material soul attached to a material body?
And do animals have souls too, or do you believe as Descartes did, that they are mindless machines.
Bishop38f8 6 months ago
@cwross1976 Everything is measurable except nothingness. What reason is there to believe in something you cannot see, measure, or prove? Your just wishful thinking. It's okay to say "I'm not sure how the universe began." You just can't accept that you don't know so you jump to the first possibility. Yes, it's possible for a god to exist BUT it's even more probable for Unicorns, fairies, dragons, and leprechauns instead of your god.
runeflame16 6 months ago
@runeflame16
I agree, but just wanted to point out that "unicorns, fairies, dragons and leprechauns" are not necessarily more probable than a god. They are for all intents and purposes equally improbable.
marchingwarrior 6 months ago
@marchingwarrior No, It's more probable to have dragons(who can breath fire and are huge), unicorns (all it is is a horse with a horn) fairies (that can fly, and have naturalist magic like growing plants) and leprechauns (that have a pot of gold and are green and short). Then a god who can do ANYTHING, knows everything, can create everything, and has lived forever. Also, that he loves everything. Oh yea, Sense the dawn of man. Approx. 100 billion people were born. You know how many died as kids?
runeflame16 6 months ago
@marchingwarrior Nice spotting here, except "unicorns, (maybe not fairies) but dragons and leprechauns" are much less probable than a god. For one these 'make-belief' creatures are generally considered visible beings, however a god is not necessarily bound by our visual senses. So actually no, not 'equally' improbable. Almost definitely improbable in terms of historical evidence for fairy creatures but I wouldn't jump to put 'fairy things' in the basket with gods, particularly the Christian God.
itmighthavebenhur 6 months ago
@icewomen881 You obviously have no understanding of the scientific subjects that your are criticizing(for example saying that just because puppies look the same as their birth mother, disproves evolution). It would be impossible to educate you with a YouTube msg, so please go and study the subject with great energy and zeal and come back to us for an informed discussion.
mikelh 7 months ago
(sigh) there is nothing before time, as there is nothing north of the north pole. The "beginning" is a feature of the universe, not a transition between two things.
breaneainn 7 months ago
How can there be a "before the big bang" when time (and space) is in a collapsed state? Didn't Einstein show that time is infinitely elastic? And doesn't that mean that when the universe collapses in on itself past, present and future can are reduced to a single point?
socksumi 7 months ago
This is what caused the big bang, you will have to remember what happened 13.72 billion years ago to understand the video: Remember - God, light and the Big Bang: /watch?v=6L2oxoagQbM
helasmoh 7 months ago
Evolution has not a shred of evidence!
icewomen881 7 months ago
@icewomen881 Evolution has lots of evidence; go talk to a biologist. I don't know what your religious views are but god is unnecessary to light the blue touch paper to set the universe going.
FallofDarkness55 7 months ago
@FallofDarkness55 Why do YOU believe evolution? show me some evidence. How can life come from none life ? Evolution is a religion. The big bang says something came from nothing.WOAH . that is a religion that takes faith & so does evolution. when have we seen a dog give off offspring that was not a dog.NEVER.The world has so much evidence of design. the tide goes in the tide goes out the sun comes up the sun goes down ...there are tons of symbiotic relationships in animals. which came first ?
icewomen881 7 months ago
@icewomen881 It's a catagorical error to confuse subjective belief systems with objective data. If you choose to use the word belief', this implies a position that requires neither evidence nor method of testability. Introducing an agency of doubt for the validity of perception leaves both sides of the argument without scope, but maintains each position. "read above" doesn't cut it I'm afraid.
breaneainn 7 months ago