@carcotasu08 True, the Germans does seem to have been extremely effective with their low budget and Ally count. I mean look at all Nations that was fighting against them, coming from so many directions... If the people in charge of Nazi warfare played their cards differently, the world would have looked very different by now.
@TheSupersoldier1234 Propaganda told them to think that, the direct quote from one of the films was, 'It's bark is worse than it's bite'. You know what an 8mm will do, judge for yourself when you have 1200 of them coming at you in a minute.
Pretty awesome! Although, I think it would have made for a much cooler video if you had chosen a better camera angle. Other than that, very good video Sir!
man if the german army back in wwii put twin mg42 on every tank, vehicle and anti air guns. we would have faced alot of causalities than usual in the war.
@lgliggy Wasn't strategy or tactics, it was just pure numbers that the allied forces won. Not to degrade the allied generals, though many of them were terrible. Simply put the allied forces had more men than the axis had bullets.
@lgliggy I tell you why, indecent officers, callous leaders on our side and brave american, french, polish, canadian, british men and women on your side..
@lgliggy Russians made it go how it went, if allmost all axis armies wouldnt had been blown in russia and instead would had with russia as buddy been waiting on normandy youd be all dead... or in camps atm. xD
@1993heavenshallburn no. Around 1200 to 1500 rounds per minute but even that is more than every other "conventional" machine gun. Only a Gatling gun and an experimental Australian system have got a higher rate of fire
@Mazryonh Loaded belts are alot of weight for the MG42 to feed. The ammo cans mounted on the twin mount will only hold 250rds. If you wanted more you would have to have someone stand next to it and help hold the additional length belts up.
@C2builder There's a few things I find odd about this AA rig. First, if you're firing at aircraft, you're going to need dependable fire on very short notice. Would a water-cooled system slow down the rate at which the barrels overheat or need replacing?
Furthermore, if one MG42 fed from the left and the other fed from the right (both ejecting down) and had a C-ration belt feeder or the like for both, you could get a balanced rig beyond 250 rounds (=12.5 seconds of firing). Could it work?
friends grandfather could only remember one thing in ww2 was hearing that and seeing his fellow trooper with his head blown off by that and himself getting shot in the leg, hasnt recovered since o.o
@Renegademxzx Actually that's not right. There are plenty of others with a higher rate-of-fire than the MG42, like the Browning M37, micro-Uzi, Mg81, etc.
@MosinDragunov1891, must be your ears because I listened several times and got input from others as well....no indication of a slow-down. Maybe it's the echo from the surrounding trees?
Yes they did, however the Mg42 twin mount of WW2 was different. It used a mount where the gunner sat down in a built-in seat behind the guns and were used mostly for anti-aircraft positions either on the ground or mounted on a flat bed truck.
Very effective, especially if the aircraft was coming in on them head on and at low altitude. The high rate of fire from two MG42's was hard to dodge.
@SamuDXFan I was so effective in fact that the current german machine gun based on the MG42 has an anti aircraft visor mountet onto it for shooting down helicopters and low flying "Düsenstrahlflugzeuge" = jets.
Now that would give you a workout. The MG42 really kicks even on a soild mount, and while I have fired the single 8mm, I have never had the chance to fire the Dual. very well done.
its on a mount, so its not necessary. by the way, there was a gun based on the mg 42 called the mg3, which was created in 1961 and is the german army's standard mg. that would be the one being used for 100 years! same goes with the american m2, which already has had 75.
The MG42 had a bolt roller locking spring added early during the war to make the bolt lock-up better within the trunion, this slowed the gun down to 1200 rpm. But, yes, the first production guns did run faster.
I'll take an M240 any day over that. Then wait........DOUBLE THAT!
XxSpriggzxX 2 days ago
@XxSpriggzxX 1200 per min.......thats ONE mg42....
MegaSlayer47 2 days ago
@XxSpriggzxX why would u take a mag over an mg42 its completely inferior to it
Wickedsicked8 2 days ago
Dear Santa...
Akuma0621 3 weeks ago
Double the gun = Double the FUN!
Sketch1994 3 weeks ago
mg42 - cool gun. Weapons that killed the most people in the history of wars
mAxZubov 1 month ago
2 of these literally make it rain lead like no other gun can.
smartbomb33 1 month ago
Mother of guns :O
chrisanator96 1 month ago
WOW!!!
Mekkaner 1 month ago
the roar is worse than the bite in some cases...
Spitfirefan1397 1 month ago
@Spitfirefan1397 not in the case of light machine gun fire however.
1cme1 1 month ago
the ideal choice for home defense
deej1478 2 months ago
This is sparta !
111BGT111 2 months ago
and that was about $300 of ammo.....
GeSStapo 2 months ago
dear santa...
Starcruiser15 2 months ago
is the ammo for this gun cheap??? coz it eats it very quickly
bigchiefmingingbolok 3 months ago
I just want one of them!!!!!
ironcitydevildog 3 months ago
I just love how that gun shoots faster then the cameras own image capture rate
MrHOSKENST 3 months ago
I can't imagine hearing that sound from the receiving end.
chauda11 4 months ago
do us a favor and stop using all the good romanian 8mm surplus
FPSdaybreaK 4 months ago
it ain't called hitlers buzzsaw for nothin'
Darkblade89811 4 months ago in playlist More videos from C2builder
Would this be suitable for home defence? lol.
TaZ101SAGA 5 months ago
come on zombies...this bitch is callin you out...
clonetrex 5 months ago
That's the right firepower.
Chaanee 5 months ago
Twin MG42....when you just have to fire thousands of dollars in seconds!
F4Wildcat 5 months ago
-Dimitri! use the panzerschreck!!
-FUCK THE PANZERSCHRECK!!, I'M TAKING THAT ONE!
45plop1 5 months ago
@lgliggy because you joined as one of the last countries to the WWII!
TheTeeWorldsfreak 6 months ago
@BryanW1988 they did have those at normandie, but as single on tripods
pettersaethre 6 months ago
Can I stay with you when zombies come?
Fudgynezz 6 months ago 10
@carcotasu08 True, the Germans does seem to have been extremely effective with their low budget and Ally count. I mean look at all Nations that was fighting against them, coming from so many directions... If the people in charge of Nazi warfare played their cards differently, the world would have looked very different by now.
TiasAhlgreN 6 months ago
Freaking devastating...
HomeMadeGunNut 7 months ago
US WW2 veterans say that the gun sound was more scary than the actual gun wierd
TheSupersoldier1234 7 months ago
@TheSupersoldier1234 Propaganda told them to think that, the direct quote from one of the films was, 'It's bark is worse than it's bite'. You know what an 8mm will do, judge for yourself when you have 1200 of them coming at you in a minute.
SpiritCock 6 months ago
dear santa...
Corpse666Eater 7 months ago
you are so bad and morbid !
Buller70City 7 months ago
now thats what i call hitlers buzz saw
RoyalPurpleProducts 7 months ago
i didnt know the germans employed twin mg42's.did this exist on the battlefield?
dempsey981 8 months ago
@dempsey981 sadly no
dragonblud1 7 months ago
god damn i would hate see what u did to a person that broke into your house lmao
3orangepineapples 8 months ago
What a scary MF!
Thomasdada 8 months ago
theres never been an LMG i didnt like
junglefun20 8 months ago
"I surrender!"
smonyboy 8 months ago
Ooh I spot a Lewis gun on the foreground
Detoyato 8 months ago
i think im def now o.o
rockslinger225 9 months ago
I want your job.
CF4LIf3 9 months ago
Pretty awesome! Although, I think it would have made for a much cooler video if you had chosen a better camera angle. Other than that, very good video Sir!
Slyerious 9 months ago
OMG i think i just crapped my pants xD
Craniken 9 months ago
man if the german army back in wwii put twin mg42 on every tank, vehicle and anti air guns. we would have faced alot of causalities than usual in the war.
lansmart 9 months ago
SIr i beg your pardon but you have seamed to have make me jizz my pants with that awsome display of firepower
hummerskickass 10 months ago
I'd say thats a bit overkill.
5MIKEY3 10 months ago
Germans had the most craziest stuff but hard to fix USA guns and tanks werent as good but easy to fix
MrKevins15 10 months ago
My first two words that I said: OH GOD!
Rawls03 10 months ago
I need that setup for my truck!
Fourteen88SoCal 10 months ago
when one MG42 isn't enough... WHEN IS ONE MG42 NOT ENOUGH?!
supersoviet8055 10 months ago 25
holy shit
E3guyy 10 months ago
@c2builder where didja get it?!
satriaagustuslife 10 months ago
If you run in front of these babies you would be minced meat
loltube334 10 months ago
HAHAHAH sick ... you need a hole truck with ammo if you want to shoot at least 5 min :D
91SPB 10 months ago
i agree w/ stewy357. although im not sure if that was brought along with squads...at least in a pair like that...to heavy. one is scary enough ._.
MetalMonarchy 11 months ago
what kind of gun is that is your right
middletonization 11 months ago
i want it !!!! give it to me its mine HA HA ha O.O
BandM91105 11 months ago
cool !!!
STAHLundBETON 11 months ago
who needs anti air with two mg42s ?
AFIrockontodavey 11 months ago
Nice video Jim!! Is that your Twin MG set up? I didnt see KiwiTed with that contraption...LOL! God Bless ya..
sum12see 11 months ago
@sum12see The mount and one of the MG42's has been sold before Ted came over or he certainly would have shot them.
C2builder 11 months ago
@sum12see Take a look at the russian casualties during WW2. It wasn't easy.
wasp9 2 months ago
how in the hell did we win WWII.
lgliggy 11 months ago 161
@lgliggy Wasn't strategy or tactics, it was just pure numbers that the allied forces won. Not to degrade the allied generals, though many of them were terrible. Simply put the allied forces had more men than the axis had bullets.
Crisis7 10 months ago
@lgliggy Because We are America we adapt and over come.
bgibson26 8 months ago
@bgibson26 We also bomb the hell out of shit. Shit like factories. No factories = no guns.
GodOfQwerty 8 months ago
@lgliggy Quantity.
lillhonken 7 months ago
@lgliggy
It's very simple. They ran out of bullets and gasoline.
tallswede80 7 months ago
@lgliggy I tell you why, indecent officers, callous leaders on our side and brave american, french, polish, canadian, british men and women on your side..
Thaulopi 6 months ago
@lgliggy No one won the WWII, only Germany Lost, and Japan was fucked up by Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Research your history please :)
Andre232323232332323 5 months ago
@lgliggy Russians made it go how it went, if allmost all axis armies wouldnt had been blown in russia and instead would had with russia as buddy been waiting on normandy youd be all dead... or in camps atm. xD
88Phobos 5 months ago
@lgliggy Two words my friend. Browning m1919
airsoftsupportsnipe1 5 months ago
@lgliggy russians millions of them
TheAlexagius 3 months ago
@lgliggy number of soldiers on, I would say
LetsPlayerKartoffeln 2 months ago
@lgliggy with air suppot :D no but without russia or without american i think germany have won the ww 2
TheLegendx3 2 months ago
@lgliggy Becfause the Germans ran out of bullets.
Wad12br 2 months ago
Whatever is in front of him is now beyond dead
BonesAndBones 1 year ago
thats not even fair LOL
MrBolsblue 1 year ago 2
that was preety cool
coolprowler 1 year ago
If that was me...I would have gotten a woody while firing.
superhornet69 1 year ago 64
@superhornet69 if that was me i don't think i could reach the trigger
oyolamauricio1 5 months ago
1 may be enough... But you can't argue with 2!
RugerFanRyan 1 year ago
German Steel!!
Homer94xXx 1 year ago
double the shit in my pants
vinisith 1 year ago 2
Mmmm, Theres only one thing better than an MG42..... Two MG42's! Outstanding dude!
SpencerAK74M 1 year ago
when one of those is not enough!!!!!
UnsatisfactionGuaran 1 year ago
thats a badass killing machine....love that gun, i call mine susie and shes the hottest girl i have ever layed my hands on...peace, love and bullets
woodstocken75 1 year ago
:O
manoffire11 1 year ago
3000 rounds per minute? holy shit. seriously.
1993heavenshallburn 1 year ago
@1993heavenshallburn no. Around 1200 to 1500 rounds per minute but even that is more than every other "conventional" machine gun. Only a Gatling gun and an experimental Australian system have got a higher rate of fire
MrRammsteinKicksAss 1 year ago
OMG ,2 mg!
yabigfire 1 year ago
Dear Santa...
tannerrox99 1 year ago 4
Get some.. get some... Get some !!
Alorrana 1 year ago
Your a big guy, so I'm a little suprised at the recoil on that mount. Is that particular AA mount designed to be bolted down to a platform or deck?
MrDavkoz 1 year ago 4
@MrDavkoz Yes, it also has lateral support legs to use.
C2builder 1 year ago
Was the gun on the left modified to spew casings to the left?
Mazryonh 1 year ago
@Mazryonh No, both MG42 guns feed from the left and eject out the bottom.
C2builder 1 year ago
@C2builder I see. I take it the guns are spaced widely enough apart that you can feed them easily and reliably.
Are the belts modified so that the maximum length isn't just 250 rounds anymore?
Mazryonh 1 year ago
@Mazryonh Loaded belts are alot of weight for the MG42 to feed. The ammo cans mounted on the twin mount will only hold 250rds. If you wanted more you would have to have someone stand next to it and help hold the additional length belts up.
C2builder 1 year ago
@C2builder fukin scary
fuadali16 1 year ago
@C2builder There's a few things I find odd about this AA rig. First, if you're firing at aircraft, you're going to need dependable fire on very short notice. Would a water-cooled system slow down the rate at which the barrels overheat or need replacing?
Furthermore, if one MG42 fed from the left and the other fed from the right (both ejecting down) and had a C-ration belt feeder or the like for both, you could get a balanced rig beyond 250 rounds (=12.5 seconds of firing). Could it work?
Mazryonh 1 year ago
@Mazryonh 1. The whole MG42 would have to be redesigned for a water cooled system to work and yes it would slow the gun down alot.
2. Yes you could do that and the setup would work very well.
C2builder 1 year ago
music to my ears
cal011316 1 year ago
Cal. 8 mal 57 mm
carinhall1 1 year ago
Thats a bloody A A gun man!
7JDH7NL7 1 year ago
music... sweet music...
MrJp990 1 year ago
so powerful ...
Pine41037 1 year ago
wtf that was shooting on the normandy beeches !!!
Budhabe 1 year ago
wow. this is proof that call of duty isn't accurate. the MG in COD 5 shoots so slow compared to real life.
cerj4eva 1 year ago
are you preparing to go to war? where do you find these guns?
xenomann442 1 year ago
The MG 81 Z had 3.000 rounds per minute
EhreDemVaterland 1 year ago
@EhreDemVaterland The MG81z were twin guns just like this setup, so thats only 1500rpm each. These MG42's were 1200rpm each, not much difference.
C2builder 1 year ago
@C2builder Sorry for my mistake :) It's allways good to learn something new.
EhreDemVaterland 1 year ago
C2builder is defo bad arse indiviual.
Luv all the clips from the WW2 guns.
I'm actually dead impressed, of how many different video clips of WW2 guns being fired you have recorded.
Excellent quality and original. Excellent work!!
OriginalLFannySlicer 1 year ago
friends grandfather could only remember one thing in ww2 was hearing that and seeing his fellow trooper with his head blown off by that and himself getting shot in the leg, hasnt recovered since o.o
cal011316 1 year ago
@Renegademxzx nope, now theres the mg 3, but its almost identical.
kingstreetchaos 1 year ago
What's with the "Comment Pending Approval"? I'm guessing it's either: Video game fanboys, Spammers, or Youtube experts. Which one?
csmybuttt 1 year ago
@csmybuttt Same with me.
MJLittleboy 1 year ago
@Renegademxzx Actually that's not right. There are plenty of others with a higher rate-of-fire than the MG42, like the Browning M37, micro-Uzi, Mg81, etc.
C2builder 1 year ago
when you just wanna shoot something up at 2400+ RPM lol
gargmel 1 year ago
Is it my ears or did the rate of fire actually slow down towards the end? If so, why does it do that? I've always been curious.
MosinDragunov1891 2 years ago
@MosinDragunov1891, must be your ears because I listened several times and got input from others as well....no indication of a slow-down. Maybe it's the echo from the surrounding trees?
C2builder 2 years ago
@C2builder
I think I know what he means. It sounds like one of the MG's ceases firing before the other, thus making the whole sound "weaker" or "slower".
FredDude27 1 year ago
@MosinDragunov1891 i think it is because one gun ran out of ammo before the other, causing the rate of fire to go down by half
burningsponge 1 year ago
@MosinDragunov1891
coulda been that one gun ran out of ammo in the belt before the other one did causing only one to fire. Just an idea
mrfish1991 1 year ago
@MosinDragunov1891 your ears
punkdudeone 1 year ago
(When you absolutely Have to kill every Allied soldier in the room)
aphsknight74 2 years ago 3
Did the german used this during WWII? I mean, the Twin MG42.
SamuDXFan 2 years ago
Yes they did, however the Mg42 twin mount of WW2 was different. It used a mount where the gunner sat down in a built-in seat behind the guns and were used mostly for anti-aircraft positions either on the ground or mounted on a flat bed truck.
C2builder 2 years ago
Was it effective against aircrafts?
SamuDXFan 2 years ago
Very effective, especially if the aircraft was coming in on them head on and at low altitude. The high rate of fire from two MG42's was hard to dodge.
C2builder 2 years ago
Ok thank you very much.
SamuDXFan 2 years ago
@SamuDXFan I was so effective in fact that the current german machine gun based on the MG42 has an anti aircraft visor mountet onto it for shooting down helicopters and low flying "Düsenstrahlflugzeuge" = jets.
yourrealnightmare 1 year ago
Wow.
the82spartans 2 years ago
you can. in texas!
DerKrazieKraut 2 years ago 2
Now that would give you a workout. The MG42 really kicks even on a soild mount, and while I have fired the single 8mm, I have never had the chance to fire the Dual. very well done.
weaponeer 2 years ago
0_0
I'm in love...
Deftones031 2 years ago
where at and how much!
korn6499 2 years ago
Hiltersäge!!!
WeeDBautZel2oo9 2 years ago
MG42 is like epic! But I personally like the browning.
starwars123465 2 years ago
50 rounds per second!!!
DaHarlekin666 2 years ago
4 words = Ohh My Freaking God! = 20 characters (including spaces)
SilverTheHedgehogZ12 2 years ago 2
You're talking about the butt stock.
It was removable to save space in tanks and bunkers. (42 wasn't used in tanks though). Also in this setup it would just get in the way.
slopedarmor 2 years ago
its on a mount, so its not necessary. by the way, there was a gun based on the mg 42 called the mg3, which was created in 1961 and is the german army's standard mg. that would be the one being used for 100 years! same goes with the american m2, which already has had 75.
kalinga01 2 years ago
was the best MG
MrJimBeamm 2 years ago 3
2 words = HOLY SHIT!
hundredsofthem 2 years ago 65
Hate to have to charge that thing.
WW2 veterans were brave SOB's!
stewy357 2 years ago 49
@stewy357 actuaaly the men who were goin up against those guns were russians
Jenga18260 1 year ago
@stewy357
amen to that
EasternAggie 1 year ago
@stewy357 its an AA gun but yeah even going up against a single mounted one is BA
macyND 1 year ago
Whats better than one MG42? 2!!!! geezes.... thats awesome.
stebolicious008 2 years ago 3
Yes. Great vid!
5/5
MauserKar98k 2 years ago
Why 1200? I fought 1500
Kampfkauz 2 years ago
The MG42 had a bolt roller locking spring added early during the war to make the bolt lock-up better within the trunion, this slowed the gun down to 1200 rpm. But, yes, the first production guns did run faster.
C2builder 2 years ago
Nice.
FadedDust21 2 years ago
um, cool! almost the same firering rate of a minigun. 1200+1200 =2400. almost! it even sounds like one...
BF2mods 2 years ago