we can't pass through walls because the Atoms in our bodies vibrate at a different frequency to the Atoms in the wall, every thing around us consists of pure energy and this brings us to the Higgs Bosun force that holds matter together, if an Indian picked up a hand grenade that washed up on a beach and he pulled the pin out, rest assured he would be blown to smithereens!
43 dislikes everyone of them a materialist in denial. The paradigm shift is at a half way point you had best get used to it or you won't be able to deal with the big changes that are inevitable.
@akislina2008 No-one is good nor evil, rather completely controlled by egoism, innocently controlled. Like puppets on a string. That is what Kabbalah says. People who are rich and powerful have stronger bigger egos than everyone else, which is why they would reach that position they are in.
hmmm we tend to believe all that is told until we are about age 3 then we question all else hince why children are so malable all nature teaches shapes, colors, actions, lessons God gave us nature to give us knowledge and we have forgotten this even a mother bird tries to protect her chiks giving her life just one example natural man was smarter and god gave him mushrooms, holy plants and special knowledge to undertand the spirit world which was the real world and this the world of teachinglove
The Red American Indian did not see it, he envision it in his third eye. He saw the big boat sailing towards him. He saw the Columbus coming. He saw the invasion of the foreigners from Europe and other ends of the earth. He saw and predicted his fall.
As now the 8 scientists see and envision the power of the Universe which is called the Living Force or Creator.
We are aware of the fundamental building blocks that things are composed of, even if we are not knowledgeable about what combinations we find them in. That's why when I travel to another country and am exposed to things that I never knew existed, they exist. I can see dirt, I can see wood, I can see colors and forms. Just as the Myth of the Indians not being able to see the ships of the conquistadors, this video is largely composed of myth.
Once we take religion and contributions from primitives out we'll be much further along. Quantum physicists are aware of everthing Abraham was but the reverse isn't true. Understanding grows and become more refined when we come to realize what should be tossed out. Religion is about power not knowledge.
I don't care what anyone else thinks. I'm searching for spiritual truth and I'm asking th spirit to lead me to the truth. This is my heart's desire. If other's want to live in darkness and graze in the grass at the bottom of the mountain. I don't even care any more.
@10kathleenbaker19 The physical truth is dealing with relationships without an anchor to a bad environment, you are right that you alone know who you really are
Answer this. If I person was born, and was just locked in a room (given only food and whatever it needs to survive) and 20 years later went out in the real world what would happen? Your saying he wouldn't see anything?
Even a philosophy as comprehensive as kabbalah is only something that has been created by mere human minds. We like to think that know the answers life's big questions, but really our understanding of everything is no better than that of an ant.
note : that's my opinion! (my opinion is ultimate truth)
Quantum physics is the most misinterpreted science out there. The reason why people come to the conclusion that one object can be in two places is because of the limitations of observation in quantum physics. We see using light which is really atomic particles bouncing off of things. We hear in a similar fashion. Now think about that. To see something in the quantum world, you would have to bounce an atomic particle off of another. The tool to observe, would deflect what you are observing.
@lordnate2000 Its not what you see its more in relationship to how we interpret the relationship, perception is the use of faculties of reasoning that is why we are intelligence, well some people anyway...Quantum Physics, there is only the physical reality, there is no one world view, there is no reality...
@waypor1 But the video was using the ship example which is completely bogus. So the ship didn't exist yet? Then, the people on the ship didn't exist? Or, maybe they got it wrong and the Indian didn't exist yet? It is true, that everything you experience is an imagination sort of, but it also exists. That's why, two people can see the same thing. The image is in your head and therefore imaginary, but you both are reacting to the same stimuli created by something that exists. This is obvious.
@lordnate2000 The whole concept of defining reality takes time to explain, these people dont really make sense nor do people understand that there is no world view only the physical reality, no two people share the same expereinces other than in how our perception is being affected tied to the impressions of environment..This is the true psychology
@waypor1 Too bad you didn't make the video. I think it would have been better. Another interesting concept is time. Some people, consider it the 4th dimension but I find it strange that the other 3 are spacial dimensions. I think time, is just a concept developed through the way our mind sequences events. If you didn't sequence events, you would have no concept of time.
@dairyburrymarry Wow! Instead of debating my arguments, you rush to a statement that is both ad hominem and an assumption. I don't need to put down people on the internet. You must be confused on who's life is sad.
you may not have ever seen a jellyfish before, but other people have, and the idea exists in the cosmos for your consciousness to grasp. you could also take into account the theory that in the realm of pure universal consciousness (to which you are directly linked), past, present, and future are indistinguishable, so perhaps you have seen a jellyfish many times in the future. or maybe it was as simple as recalling a childhood memory of seeing a jellyfish in a book about animals.
so if in brought a tribesman who has seen noting but jungle his entire life to a big city. He would not be able to see the buildings but in fact be able to walk right through them???? has that experiment ever been attempted????
Because he doesn't know buildings, they are not there for him. Because you don't know him not knowing buildings, he is not there for you.
It's like all the tiny lightbulbs on an old tv. No matter what shapes and colors are shown, if you look in real close, all the light bulbs and colors are always there, but only some of them are lit up depending on what program you are watching. The tribesman is on a different channel than the buildings, but uses the same lights to take shape and form.
"because you dont know him not knowing buildings, he is not there for you"?????
what i am trying to say is what if i did know him?? what if I in person took this tribesman from his habitat and brought him to the big city... Then I know him i can see him he can see me but i still have not explained to him what the tall buildings look like..SO IN THIS REALITY CAN HE SEE THE BUILDINGS??
I didn't say because you don't know him, I said because you don't know him NOT KNOWING BUILDINGS. There is no 'what if'. 'What if' is you asking about changes in external circumstances. As you are, any attempt to change external circumstances can only be done within the current limitations of your mind. Same as my own. I am not capable of seeing someone walk through buildings. What you would have to do to see someone walking through buildings would allow you to do it too.
cont... So if he can walk through the buildings that you can see, YOU CAN'T KNOW HIM. Not as you are, or as I assume you are (seeing how you're asking the question).
but i do know him not knowing the building!!!! your not making any sense. if i met this guy while hiking through the amazon, then he would be in my reality as would I be in his, if i was then to take him to the foot of the john handcock building in chicago. he would not know the building but i would know him not knowing the building.. but im pretty sure he would be able to see it and would probably have fairly SOAR HEAD IF HE ATTEMPTED TO WALK THROUGH THE BUILDING
Indeed, a man you met in the Amazon would have a sore head if he attempted to walk through the building, but he would probably see it. But he would know the building, regardless of whether or not he could identify it as such.
I dunno. His views on this matter are slightly different than my own. I think he may be missing a dimensional understanding of it. Miracles have been performed, but if they could be performed through sheer ignorance, many wild animals who enter cities for the first time would be passing through buildings before our very eyes.
My definition of knowing and not knowing buildings in this case is a little different.
Reality seems to be what we make it to be. Much like a drug trip. If its good, its good. if its bad, then we know it and feel it at the same exact time.
I think most of you who are criticizing this are missing the point. I may be wrong, but it seems that the whole Indian and Caveman analogy is meant to reflect the notion that we only perceive things because our senses (the vehicles) allow us to. I don't think he literally means that a native wouldn't see a ship that first time. I find it humorous that many of you think this is a cult trying to get cash when its been around for so long and has opened up a lot of minds.
He does mean that literally the native would not see the ship. It is a true story of when the Spanish first landed in South America. The natives could not see the ships till it was explained to them was was in the sea. It wasnt that they saw strange things, it was that they saw nothing. Cant say it wouldnt happen that way because it did happen that way.
@alichy He said a caveman woul dwalk through walls because he doesnt believe in walls .... that is not true. If you shoot a caveman with a gun, he doesn't know what a gun is but the bullet will still kill him, even if he believes it is a big cuddly gift from the gods !! He has made a real error here .. many things we can see until we have a concept first BUT .. you will quickly learn what a bullet is and what walls are .. you wont be able to pass through them harmlessly !!
Sorry but there are documented facts of small native groups who had never seen a helicopter or a walkie talkie who thought these pilots were gods or extra-terrestrials from another planet.
this doesnt make sence, b/c you never seen it, you dont see it? the indians did see the ship... same way a caveman would see modern buildings... someone please explain what he means by them "not" seeing it
yeah that's the obvious error in this theory. I belive they haven't really understood the world neither and just like other stubborn people (most of us) they keep trying to prove their theory instead of looking for the total truth.
What about people who have never seen before and have been given surgery to gain sight for the first time. They have had no comprehension of a visible reality and only see light and shadow that they cant make sense of. But they are not walking through walls for god sake. Common people dont take everything that is spoon fed to you. There are cultures today that have never seen modern culture. lets take one of them and see if they can walk through walls.
When i was growing up, i saw everything for the first time. I didnt need someone to describe a the cat to me before it became visible. It immediately peaked my curiosity and i pulled its tail. I can understand seeing an object and not being able to make sense of it. But the light and shadows they cast are still perceptible, even to the ignorant.
I believe your right, asides from that we learn who we truly are....cause I never came to knowing asides I'm an aspect of reality....but everything is one, you're totally right =) ........everything and anything can only be real or not real. Referring to reality, it's all one. I LOVE BUDDHA ,GOD, REALITY,.... WHATEVER!!!!
OTVIIIClear the great thing about kabbalah is that if you persevere enough and have a good teacher you will experiance direct knowledge and you will no longer be caught up in dogmas or beleif systems of others
Oh, and science WELCOMES a challenge. Revising science is the POINT. The Nobel people know that too, they give prizes for furthering our understanding of the world. But scientists don't just take the word of any kook who's arguments only work in their minds and have no emperical evidence. You use science just to READ the freakin book in the first place. Your eyes observe the text. And I will concur on the existence of printed words in the book. So we can AGREE on the existence of printed words!
oh you poor poor boy, didn't you hear? the government is going to stop funding for science if they don't come up with any answers. now allow your self to swallow this question: why the hell would the answer to a question be within the question.
the answer to the question is already above the question. above your perception. and its up to you to allow whatevers beyond your perception to CHANGE you so as to see it!
so take it like man! and TRY kabbalah! just be brave man ill help you!
Yeah, according to it's past actions the U.S. government MAY be the leading geniuses on our planet. They'll probly trash their Blackberries and ride horses to work.
I've got nothing against questions, even those whose answers are within themselves, but I'm not gonna swallow some douchebag's opinion on how REALITY, something which takes SCIENCE to explain, actually operates. But go ahead, open the little door in your empty head and let him in!
you think a couple a scientist want to submit to the fact that all they've dedicated their lives to has been a lie?
will you ever submit to the fact that you've never actually tested kabbalah? and that every comment you've posted on every kabbalah clip so far have been assumptions? fantasies?
The 'test' of kabbala is entirely subjective, and therefore meaningless outside of my own or your own imagination. I can't see it happen, I can't test it's properties, it doesn't fit into the reality which produced my senses, so what does it have to do with me? As much as the dream you had last night has to do with me.
but that indain in the film saw the ship and the people in it and realized it`s reality when the new comers started killing his people,his family ,or even himself
...will perceive everything right and beyond those 5 senses. And then we will see that everything is the same light and that nothing is separate, so then there really is no ship, no nothing, it doesnt exist, there is just the light, one entirety. But as I said we are deceived by our senses and we think that that is reality. P.S. But I am not sure if thats right. Its quite hard to understand, when thinking is still in those shackles xD
I think that he wants to say that everything is created by boundless light. We the creations have our vessels (5 senses) and we perceive that light - our reality by those vessels, with program which converts that light to understandable information for us. But we really dont see the reality the way it is, we see an illusion, which is created by those 5 sense organs and that program within. To understand what reality really is we must develop the sixth sense (path to spirituality) which...
I believe what he is trying to illustrate is probability amplitudes...but WOW did he ever do a woefully horrible job explaining it. The analogy is really REALLY bad!
hey so if the caveman were to appear, and we can't see it because we haven't seen a caveman then we can't see him, even if he does go thru walls and buildings... and we may even go thru him since we can't see him...
So that means that if I cover your eyes, and take a you a place you never have seen before and I lock you in a building that is pitch balck, you can actualy walk through the walls?
Na somethings there...energy exists...just in varying frequencies. A different frequency produces X, another Y, another Z, and so on. Frequencies and resulting vibrations and interactions exist...and this is the true building blocks of our world
I'm no scholar, and this is strictly MY personal, 'somewhat educated' perception! So that this comment for what its worth please!
This is a very important subject!Another great Video by ARIfilms.What is Reality? This is definitely one of my Favorite Videos! Rav Michael Laitman is really the man that everyone should pay attention in our days and listen carefully to him.He explains everything with clarity.One can feel that he speaks true Kabbalah Wisdom!
The wisdom of kabbalah is not so complex.Humility,simplicity,oneness with the universe of your perception.Understanding that in knowing more you percieve just how little you do know.
George Berkeley born in Ireland, 1685 was saying the same exact thing, this world does not exist but in your mind, and was attacked by someone with a lesser mind, Dr Samuel Johnson, who kicked a rock and said, I refute you thus...
This video has sparked my theological imagination, thanks.
Some Christians hesitate to look at this stuff for fear it is idolatry/heresy. If you want to look at some of these types of ideas from a Christian perspective, check out Process theology. Theologians like Whitehead, Cobb, & Hartshorne are a good start.
the obstacle with kabbalah is staying connected after the drudgery of everyday using the same tools get repetitive and you know it works but your ego/opponent constantly second guesses you and manipulates your reason and thoughts
before you know it, the suddenly syndrome, you are in the dark.
there needs to be a book on this ways to stay connected to the light that i have felt profoundly before
Excellent video, thanks for posting. Just wondering how Columbus was able to identify all the unusual things in the new world then? These things were new to his mind too, just as the ships were new to the natives.
There was a slightly cruel but very useful cognitive psych experiment done on kittens... The kittens all lived in isolation with cones on their heads and were ONLY exposed to horizontal lines, not vertical. After living their first 3 months of life like this, the kittens were put in real-world situations. They were crashing into vertical lines because they had no mental construct to recognize them.
Might I suggest reading "the Crack in the Cosmic Egg" by Joseph Chilton Pearce. While I do still find some troubling assertions presented in this book, it is far more "scholarly", and does not make such painfull "leaps of logic" as does Kabbal (Well enough outside the Lunatic fringe). Never forget that humanities basic pecreption of "reality" or "truth" overall is on far shakier ground than our perception of Physical reality. Be skeptical, it's GOOD for your thinking! =)
Yes I must have missed your point. I thought you were saying that the tree fell in the forest on a new born child and no one saw it fall would the child die. In this example I thought that you were denying the new born child as an observer. I do think that the new born child is someone. Therefore this someone ( the new born) is the observer who perceives the tree falling on top of him or her. So if this is not what you were saying can you please clarify?
I myself do not agree with these teachings but not, as far as I understand, for the same reasons as you. I do think that it make sense to fully understand as many positions as possible to see if my own world view is able to stand up to scrutiny.
As I said. As a phylosophical aproach to the exploration of perception, fine, but to suggest physical reality exists ONLY in the mind is preposterous. According to kabbal, the newborn, having no preconcieved notion or awareness of a tree, should not be harmed by it. A complete assinine assumption. =P
Honestly, a lot of soldiers "never saw it comming", but have the scars to prove the bullets were pretty damn real. You can drive a truck through the assertions of Kabbal. As with most inane religious thought, it's assertions are pushed well beyond any reason or usefullness, into the lunatic fringe.
In some of the other teachings on Kabbala on Youtube posted by this same user, the claim is made that a person can inherit conceptions from their parents and therefore they would not be a blank slate at birth.
The solders knew they were in a battle or at least they knew of the existence of deadly weapons. The premises of Kabala are not as inane as they may appear at first. I do think that as presented here they are incorrect but they are worth contemplation simply because they do have some degree of logic based on our subjective experiences as thinking beings.
There are examples of people doing all sorts of strange things that we would think should cause their death or disfigurement and they walk away unscathed. The condition of the mind directly does color our experience of reality in both mundane and profound and ways.
The most profound support for these counterintuitive concepts and the reason we should not dismiss them too quickly is found in the current theories of quantum physics. As far as I understand, this theory is currently the most accurate theory available for understanding the behavior of subatomic particles, and therefore the entire basis for our physical reality.
Early Childhood studies of environmental reactions would seem to dispel "inheritence" outright (no evidence). Given our limited ability to observe imperical evidence, theories supported w/ minor evidence may need serve as our understanding of physics at the sub-atomic level, however one must be not equate sub with macro (variables of mass and complexity). Kabbal suggest a reality for which evidence/observation discounts outright with ease.
I also disagree with this Kabalistic view of inheritance. I only mentioned it to show that the baby was from their point of view the observer and not a "blank slate" which you seemed to assert. What evidence do you have that babies are "blank slates". I still do not understand your point on the baby in the forest as a way of refuting Kabalist assertions.
The sub-atomic and our larger scale experience of reality do not seem to behave consistently, but are you denying that the observer plays a role on the fundamental building blocks of that reality?
A matter of mixed definitions I suppose. Philosophically speaking, surely what IS reality to US but perception and subsequent attempts to overcome limitations to "know" it. But to lob this philsophical conceptualization of "reality" into matters of material science (Physical Reality), and on this, suggest physical properties ought to be alterable merely though impossed conception, or accidental misconception, is simply misguided.
Kabbal mixes two unlike definitions of "reality" to form one somewhat immature and misguided conclusion. Pearce himself makes some leaps in this as well, which I found discomforting, but his overall approach is far better reasoned.
The human mind is not the sharply honned instrument a we give it credit for. It is prone to error, easily manipulated, often forms irrational conclusions and decifers observation with poor accuracy. As for our memories, studys prove time and time again, they are largely edited and falsified by the ego. true "reality" for ourselves, and of the world, does seem like a far quest considering all that we do understand of ourselves, but somehow we still seem to muddle through all right. =) peace!
I have been following Kabbalah for years now and love it. I know that people misunderstand the principles because of the EGO and the five senses. In some way it is to bad they don't want to change. I also know that some feel what's in it for me selfish feelings.
Which book is the one to start with? And should I try to find someone who have read it to help me understand? Is it working even if I read an English version? Could I use audio? Lot of questions. Is someone willing to help me get started?
Its so close to the ideas that the Vedas present. Vedas talk about "Absolute Real" is uncreated and unchanging, i.e. Pure Consciousness which pervades Universe.
I also would like to suggest to take a look at 'Bhagavad Gita' (song of god) to understand more about this. You could check URL: arshabodha org/ab/wcms/en/home/teachings/bhagavadgita/index.html
Similar ideas exists in spiritual traditions, kabbalah, suffism, veda etc.
My opinion is that they are good ways for personnal improvment and achieving inner peace as long as they are not taken too literray and mixed with the physical world as this video seems to suggest.
This has been flagged as spam show
שלום, הזמנת חבר לערוץ
''אל האמת'' - שמע ישראל
מועדפים סרטונים 175 - FAVORTE MOVIES בנושאים שונים ומענינים. הדברות. זוהר. קבלה . ועוד..
שירים בעברית 181 - HEBREW SONGS
שירים ביידיש 200 - YIDDISH SONG ניגונים 116 - MELODIE
HELLO, MEMBER CHANNEL INVITATION
TO THE TRUTH, THE TRUE GOD – SHMA ISRAEL
FAVORTE MOVISS – 175 DIFFERENT AND INTERESTING
topics.Commandments. ZOHAR. Kabbalah. And more
YonaArieFeinberg 1 week ago
we can't pass through walls because the Atoms in our bodies vibrate at a different frequency to the Atoms in the wall, every thing around us consists of pure energy and this brings us to the Higgs Bosun force that holds matter together, if an Indian picked up a hand grenade that washed up on a beach and he pulled the pin out, rest assured he would be blown to smithereens!
5119873 3 weeks ago
43 dislikes everyone of them a materialist in denial. The paradigm shift is at a half way point you had best get used to it or you won't be able to deal with the big changes that are inevitable.
whitenightf3 4 months ago
amazing isnt it? people are now starting to realize that all those books written thousands of years ago really have something to them.
DubbPeeh 4 months ago
hhhhhahahahahaha
cybermone 5 months ago in playlist Shamanic
Really great video, thank you so much for the upload.
Tallykoren 6 months ago
kabbalah explains why good people suffer in this world but dont explain why evil people are rich and powerful.
akislina2008 6 months ago
@akislina2008 No-one is good nor evil, rather completely controlled by egoism, innocently controlled. Like puppets on a string. That is what Kabbalah says. People who are rich and powerful have stronger bigger egos than everyone else, which is why they would reach that position they are in.
ERiiK98 3 months ago
@ERiiK98 there are many people with great ego that are poor.i wish it was that simple my friend.
akislina2008 3 months ago
I disagree with the Indian passing thru' a wall analogy, but I see where he's going with this.
wholelover 6 months ago
@wholelover Makes you worry though .. that he takes it too far with this obvious example .. ?
Fraterculae 4 months ago
hmmm we tend to believe all that is told until we are about age 3 then we question all else hince why children are so malable all nature teaches shapes, colors, actions, lessons God gave us nature to give us knowledge and we have forgotten this even a mother bird tries to protect her chiks giving her life just one example natural man was smarter and god gave him mushrooms, holy plants and special knowledge to undertand the spirit world which was the real world and this the world of teachinglove
karenl1234 8 months ago
The Red American Indian did not see it, he envision it in his third eye. He saw the big boat sailing towards him. He saw the Columbus coming. He saw the invasion of the foreigners from Europe and other ends of the earth. He saw and predicted his fall.
As now the 8 scientists see and envision the power of the Universe which is called the Living Force or Creator.
marekmzielinski 9 months ago
wow this is something, i like it.
cuautlajal 11 months ago
We are aware of the fundamental building blocks that things are composed of, even if we are not knowledgeable about what combinations we find them in. That's why when I travel to another country and am exposed to things that I never knew existed, they exist. I can see dirt, I can see wood, I can see colors and forms. Just as the Myth of the Indians not being able to see the ships of the conquistadors, this video is largely composed of myth.
lollolllolllll 1 year ago
Once we take religion and contributions from primitives out we'll be much further along. Quantum physicists are aware of everthing Abraham was but the reverse isn't true. Understanding grows and become more refined when we come to realize what should be tossed out. Religion is about power not knowledge.
omegapointil 1 year ago
I don't care what anyone else thinks. I'm searching for spiritual truth and I'm asking th spirit to lead me to the truth. This is my heart's desire. If other's want to live in darkness and graze in the grass at the bottom of the mountain. I don't even care any more.
10kathleenbaker19 1 year ago 3
@10kathleenbaker19 I'm on that same path my friend.
Indeed~~~
doesthismakeanysense 1 year ago
@10kathleenbaker19 The physical truth is dealing with relationships without an anchor to a bad environment, you are right that you alone know who you really are
waylandpor 1 year ago
Answer this. If I person was born, and was just locked in a room (given only food and whatever it needs to survive) and 20 years later went out in the real world what would happen? Your saying he wouldn't see anything?
shanecombs1993 1 year ago
@shanecombs1993 god DAMN you are COMPLETELY missing the point here.... SMH
Daedae333 1 year ago
Even a philosophy as comprehensive as kabbalah is only something that has been created by mere human minds. We like to think that know the answers life's big questions, but really our understanding of everything is no better than that of an ant.
note : that's my opinion! (my opinion is ultimate truth)
pumlin1 1 year ago
@pumlin1 you opinion means jack shit...
Daedae333 1 year ago
So how do I stop percieving the walls?
moqutpar 1 year ago
I dont get the Idian and the cave man example...They see strange stuff that they can't relate to. Why is he saying they dont see anything?????????
theiceman74 1 year ago
Mmmmmmm..................
I don't know yet, the Indian story bothers me. If I see something strange, I think: "hey, what's that, haven't seen that before".
The Indian would see everything and go into psychosis immediatly: Too much unknown input.
Just my two cents.
royorbitol 1 year ago
The question is not who is the Messiah, but what. The answer: Kabbalah.
MAK04191990 1 year ago
Quantum physics is the most misinterpreted science out there. The reason why people come to the conclusion that one object can be in two places is because of the limitations of observation in quantum physics. We see using light which is really atomic particles bouncing off of things. We hear in a similar fashion. Now think about that. To see something in the quantum world, you would have to bounce an atomic particle off of another. The tool to observe, would deflect what you are observing.
lordnate2000 1 year ago
@lordnate2000 Its not what you see its more in relationship to how we interpret the relationship, perception is the use of faculties of reasoning that is why we are intelligence, well some people anyway...Quantum Physics, there is only the physical reality, there is no one world view, there is no reality...
waypor1 1 year ago
@waypor1 But the video was using the ship example which is completely bogus. So the ship didn't exist yet? Then, the people on the ship didn't exist? Or, maybe they got it wrong and the Indian didn't exist yet? It is true, that everything you experience is an imagination sort of, but it also exists. That's why, two people can see the same thing. The image is in your head and therefore imaginary, but you both are reacting to the same stimuli created by something that exists. This is obvious.
lordnate2000 1 year ago
@lordnate2000 The whole concept of defining reality takes time to explain, these people dont really make sense nor do people understand that there is no world view only the physical reality, no two people share the same expereinces other than in how our perception is being affected tied to the impressions of environment..This is the true psychology
waypor1 1 year ago
@waypor1 Too bad you didn't make the video. I think it would have been better. Another interesting concept is time. Some people, consider it the 4th dimension but I find it strange that the other 3 are spacial dimensions. I think time, is just a concept developed through the way our mind sequences events. If you didn't sequence events, you would have no concept of time.
lordnate2000 1 year ago
@lordnate2000 you don't get it do you. you must live a sad life.
dairyburrymarry 10 months ago
@dairyburrymarry Wow! Instead of debating my arguments, you rush to a statement that is both ad hominem and an assumption. I don't need to put down people on the internet. You must be confused on who's life is sad.
lordnate2000 10 months ago
Ultimately the indian did see it.
racerxtoday 1 year ago
Ramohog,
Kabbalah existed for thousands of years before your "Christ". In fact, it's probably what Jesus was talking about.
terabrat 1 year ago
franz, it's in the movie.
terabrat 1 year ago
Hallucination...
KareemAbawi 2 years ago
Its not a religion, its the truth.
screwopenborders 2 years ago 3
ye i know i just like it
micap20078 2 years ago
@screwopenborders Talk about history repeating itself...
7ochka 1 year ago
@7ochka its been a while. care to elaborate what your talking about?
screwopenborders 1 year ago
not just kabbalah, it doesnt even need a name. ive been opening into it since i was little and never knew what to call it
jennyrgar 2 years ago
same here.
wemb0505 2 years ago
you may not have ever seen a jellyfish before, but other people have, and the idea exists in the cosmos for your consciousness to grasp. you could also take into account the theory that in the realm of pure universal consciousness (to which you are directly linked), past, present, and future are indistinguishable, so perhaps you have seen a jellyfish many times in the future. or maybe it was as simple as recalling a childhood memory of seeing a jellyfish in a book about animals.
rlong67 2 years ago
If what you are saying is true, then how come the universe did not inform the Indian that he is a facing a large ship ?
smilingdata 1 year ago
The word for this is: reification
Zzozze 2 years ago
so if in brought a tribesman who has seen noting but jungle his entire life to a big city. He would not be able to see the buildings but in fact be able to walk right through them???? has that experiment ever been attempted????
1123mozart 2 years ago
Because he doesn't know buildings, they are not there for him. Because you don't know him not knowing buildings, he is not there for you.
It's like all the tiny lightbulbs on an old tv. No matter what shapes and colors are shown, if you look in real close, all the light bulbs and colors are always there, but only some of them are lit up depending on what program you are watching. The tribesman is on a different channel than the buildings, but uses the same lights to take shape and form.
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
"because you dont know him not knowing buildings, he is not there for you"?????
what i am trying to say is what if i did know him?? what if I in person took this tribesman from his habitat and brought him to the big city... Then I know him i can see him he can see me but i still have not explained to him what the tall buildings look like..SO IN THIS REALITY CAN HE SEE THE BUILDINGS??
1123mozart 2 years ago
I didn't say because you don't know him, I said because you don't know him NOT KNOWING BUILDINGS. There is no 'what if'. 'What if' is you asking about changes in external circumstances. As you are, any attempt to change external circumstances can only be done within the current limitations of your mind. Same as my own. I am not capable of seeing someone walk through buildings. What you would have to do to see someone walking through buildings would allow you to do it too.
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
cont... So if he can walk through the buildings that you can see, YOU CAN'T KNOW HIM. Not as you are, or as I assume you are (seeing how you're asking the question).
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
cont... then again, I'm no expert on walk'nz through buildinz :P
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
but i do know him not knowing the building!!!! your not making any sense. if i met this guy while hiking through the amazon, then he would be in my reality as would I be in his, if i was then to take him to the foot of the john handcock building in chicago. he would not know the building but i would know him not knowing the building.. but im pretty sure he would be able to see it and would probably have fairly SOAR HEAD IF HE ATTEMPTED TO WALK THROUGH THE BUILDING
1123mozart 2 years ago
Indeed, a man you met in the Amazon would have a sore head if he attempted to walk through the building, but he would probably see it. But he would know the building, regardless of whether or not he could identify it as such.
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
fair enough!!
1123mozart 2 years ago
so why does this doctor say the caveman could walk through walls
1123mozart 2 years ago
I dunno. His views on this matter are slightly different than my own. I think he may be missing a dimensional understanding of it. Miracles have been performed, but if they could be performed through sheer ignorance, many wild animals who enter cities for the first time would be passing through buildings before our very eyes.
My definition of knowing and not knowing buildings in this case is a little different.
VegetoStevieD 2 years ago
i love this one
0GodsAngeL0 2 years ago 3
Interesting, and I often have the same questions. This guy is great at describing things.
karlkarlkarl1234 2 years ago 2
5:10 a child is born, a child gives meaning
Cedricardo666 2 years ago 2
Something is not right. Why is it that a new born baby cannot pass through a wall? The baby does not know what a wall is!
namiwin2k 2 years ago
how do you know that babies do not pass trough walls all of the time? Perhaps they do so normally, but we cant see it.
thecalling418 2 years ago
THANK YOU FOR THIS AMAZING KNOWLEDGE! LIFE-CHANGING TO SAY THE LEAST! INFINITE LOVE TO YOU ALL AT ARIFilms!
-Abraham Rodriguez
pookzta 2 years ago 11
Reality seems to be what we make it to be. Much like a drug trip. If its good, its good. if its bad, then we know it and feel it at the same exact time.
Physics400 2 years ago
quantum physicists usually refer to the Yin and the Yang to illustrate their theories...
kaltenbach16 2 years ago
I think most of you who are criticizing this are missing the point. I may be wrong, but it seems that the whole Indian and Caveman analogy is meant to reflect the notion that we only perceive things because our senses (the vehicles) allow us to. I don't think he literally means that a native wouldn't see a ship that first time. I find it humorous that many of you think this is a cult trying to get cash when its been around for so long and has opened up a lot of minds.
alichy 2 years ago 18
He does mean that literally the native would not see the ship. It is a true story of when the Spanish first landed in South America. The natives could not see the ships till it was explained to them was was in the sea. It wasnt that they saw strange things, it was that they saw nothing. Cant say it wouldnt happen that way because it did happen that way.
Nakedwow 2 years ago
@alichy they are closed minded my friend!
emkplayboy6 1 year ago
@alichy UNTRUE. His whole stance is you can't see until someone tells you what to look for, which is bs, devil-worshipping malarky.
ALPINESWATCHES 8 months ago
@alichy He said a caveman woul dwalk through walls because he doesnt believe in walls .... that is not true. If you shoot a caveman with a gun, he doesn't know what a gun is but the bullet will still kill him, even if he believes it is a big cuddly gift from the gods !! He has made a real error here .. many things we can see until we have a concept first BUT .. you will quickly learn what a bullet is and what walls are .. you wont be able to pass through them harmlessly !!
Fraterculae 4 months ago
Sorry but there are documented facts of small native groups who had never seen a helicopter or a walkie talkie who thought these pilots were gods or extra-terrestrials from another planet.
brkdaice 2 years ago
You watch Zeitgeist and then bring those facts to a forum.. Nice..
JimiDelicious 2 years ago
You have seen UFO's before on tv and movies thats why your mind put it together.
Rechocha 2 years ago
this doesnt make sence, b/c you never seen it, you dont see it? the indians did see the ship... same way a caveman would see modern buildings... someone please explain what he means by them "not" seeing it
Avithor 2 years ago
so according the this video, a baby fresh out of the womb won't be affected by a bullet to the back of the head
Weezzuul 2 years ago 2
yeah that's the obvious error in this theory. I belive they haven't really understood the world neither and just like other stubborn people (most of us) they keep trying to prove their theory instead of looking for the total truth.
omfg4000 2 years ago
oh yeah, so what happens when sombody realizes that the entire world is full of etherial walls, do we suddenly all become killed by the mass???
masterkuros 2 years ago
"walls shadows of in, All implies everything, way world wisdom L" ...
rock78778 2 years ago
minds are made of matter if the matter exsist then so does cognition!!..
gohighproductions 2 years ago
What about people who have never seen before and have been given surgery to gain sight for the first time. They have had no comprehension of a visible reality and only see light and shadow that they cant make sense of. But they are not walking through walls for god sake. Common people dont take everything that is spoon fed to you. There are cultures today that have never seen modern culture. lets take one of them and see if they can walk through walls.
davevisk 2 years ago
When i was growing up, i saw everything for the first time. I didnt need someone to describe a the cat to me before it became visible. It immediately peaked my curiosity and i pulled its tail. I can understand seeing an object and not being able to make sense of it. But the light and shadows they cast are still perceptible, even to the ignorant.
davevisk 2 years ago
To say that somebody gave me my desires implies duality. There may be many fingers on one hand but still the one hand. We are all of that ONE.
Buddhism is the practice of learning who you truly are. When you see directly for yourself the question of who and why is already answered.
bobbywise 3 years ago 2
I believe your right, asides from that we learn who we truly are....cause I never came to knowing asides I'm an aspect of reality....but everything is one, you're totally right =) ........everything and anything can only be real or not real. Referring to reality, it's all one. I LOVE BUDDHA ,GOD, REALITY,.... WHATEVER!!!!
refuel829 2 years ago
Hindus and Buddhists view the world in much the same way. Emptyness, nonduality, It is your mind that creates this world, yada yada yada...
bobbywise 3 years ago 4
our desires manifest what you see in this world.. the question is who gave me these desires?? and why??
this an answer only kabbalah will bring my friend, hence EVERYTHING but the wisdom of kabbalah aims to suppress these questions.
vicariousli 3 years ago
but im so lost...the way he explained this...confused me..
i didnt read ne of this in qabbalah
ChillC 3 years ago
OTVIIIClear the great thing about kabbalah is that if you persevere enough and have a good teacher you will experiance direct knowledge and you will no longer be caught up in dogmas or beleif systems of others
cheesyrichardhead 3 years ago
Oh, and science WELCOMES a challenge. Revising science is the POINT. The Nobel people know that too, they give prizes for furthering our understanding of the world. But scientists don't just take the word of any kook who's arguments only work in their minds and have no emperical evidence. You use science just to READ the freakin book in the first place. Your eyes observe the text. And I will concur on the existence of printed words in the book. So we can AGREE on the existence of printed words!
OTVIIIClear 3 years ago
oh you poor poor boy, didn't you hear? the government is going to stop funding for science if they don't come up with any answers. now allow your self to swallow this question: why the hell would the answer to a question be within the question.
the answer to the question is already above the question. above your perception. and its up to you to allow whatevers beyond your perception to CHANGE you so as to see it!
so take it like man! and TRY kabbalah! just be brave man ill help you!
illevity 3 years ago
Yeah, according to it's past actions the U.S. government MAY be the leading geniuses on our planet. They'll probly trash their Blackberries and ride horses to work.
I've got nothing against questions, even those whose answers are within themselves, but I'm not gonna swallow some douchebag's opinion on how REALITY, something which takes SCIENCE to explain, actually operates. But go ahead, open the little door in your empty head and let him in!
OTVIIIClear 3 years ago
my head is empty for something other than itself.. i hope yours will be too so you can stop feeding off yourself.
its all up to you now man, whether your actually going to justify everything you've said by testing kabbalah to the very end..
illevity 3 years ago 3
you think a couple a scientist want to submit to the fact that all they've dedicated their lives to has been a lie?
will you ever submit to the fact that you've never actually tested kabbalah? and that every comment you've posted on every kabbalah clip so far have been assumptions? fantasies?
illevity 3 years ago
The 'test' of kabbala is entirely subjective, and therefore meaningless outside of my own or your own imagination. I can't see it happen, I can't test it's properties, it doesn't fit into the reality which produced my senses, so what does it have to do with me? As much as the dream you had last night has to do with me.
OTVIIIClear 3 years ago
Does not sicentology talks abotu imaginary world as well!...LOL Enstein was christian and he was educated in Christian school
katdanmo2 3 years ago
but that indain in the film saw the ship and the people in it and realized it`s reality when the new comers started killing his people,his family ,or even himself
sky757533 3 years ago
read the greeks, they were the first to have atomic theory.
myopisynesthite 3 years ago
government = to govern the mind
defaultuser11433 3 years ago
its to govern ment(al) but its the same in the end :)
ZeNMoDi 3 years ago
slight of hand trick - once you know how the trick works you can't be fooled
art is a lie that give vision to reality
what dimension do thoughts operate in? seriously i would like to know.
defaultuser11433 3 years ago
This video will make history. Just give it some more time.
renrebel 3 years ago
Like he said in the film, you dont have the model of the concept in your mind, so it doesn't actually exist to you. You are'nt concious to it.
davecourtney08 3 years ago
...will perceive everything right and beyond those 5 senses. And then we will see that everything is the same light and that nothing is separate, so then there really is no ship, no nothing, it doesnt exist, there is just the light, one entirety. But as I said we are deceived by our senses and we think that that is reality. P.S. But I am not sure if thats right. Its quite hard to understand, when thinking is still in those shackles xD
NeoThundeX009 3 years ago 2
I think that he wants to say that everything is created by boundless light. We the creations have our vessels (5 senses) and we perceive that light - our reality by those vessels, with program which converts that light to understandable information for us. But we really dont see the reality the way it is, we see an illusion, which is created by those 5 sense organs and that program within. To understand what reality really is we must develop the sixth sense (path to spirituality) which...
NeoThundeX009 3 years ago 2
hey i think i got it..he.s saying you cant control other peoples reality..but what u believe is true is true for you..right?
ashak09 3 years ago
"I don't hear anything I don't see anyting but I feel"
icreatemyreality 3 years ago
I believe what he is trying to illustrate is probability amplitudes...but WOW did he ever do a woefully horrible job explaining it. The analogy is really REALLY bad!
DominusVeritatem 3 years ago
this doesn't make sense, what if your born blind, what, you can walk through walls!?
Ayasdantsi 3 years ago
hey so if the caveman were to appear, and we can't see it because we haven't seen a caveman then we can't see him, even if he does go thru walls and buildings... and we may even go thru him since we can't see him...
jameslikebond 3 years ago
nice one
vegnagunL 3 years ago
How big can you allow your EGO to get? how can people claim or label SCIENCE as kabbalah?
whiner00 3 years ago
I'm a LDS, so I understand the true nature of the Godhead.
EscapeNewJersey 3 years ago
Please prove God has a physical manifestation, let alone a "head".
Deism: We don't know and neither do you.
mgatling 3 years ago
nOSEBLEED
09163439131 3 years ago
How can you not
Reido2828 3 years ago
So that means that if I cover your eyes, and take a you a place you never have seen before and I lock you in a building that is pitch balck, you can actualy walk through the walls?
jespriella 3 years ago
naa. cos you have already created the structure through ur mind
lanky268 3 years ago
Na somethings there...energy exists...just in varying frequencies. A different frequency produces X, another Y, another Z, and so on. Frequencies and resulting vibrations and interactions exist...and this is the true building blocks of our world
I'm no scholar, and this is strictly MY personal, 'somewhat educated' perception! So that this comment for what its worth please!
cribster123 3 years ago 2
Good one. My money is you wont be walking through any walls.
buddry007 3 years ago
very interesting!
ive never heard of "kabbalah" before...
dmix09 3 years ago
This is a very important subject!Another great Video by ARIfilms.What is Reality? This is definitely one of my Favorite Videos! Rav Michael Laitman is really the man that everyone should pay attention in our days and listen carefully to him.He explains everything with clarity.One can feel that he speaks true Kabbalah Wisdom!
Jame243 3 years ago
if the world isn't real until you are told about it - how does one who is newly born recreate this world?
pumanca 3 years ago
Wow, i might just grow a beard, change my name to something fancy and exotic and get people to believe anything i say. Jackpot
Aethah121 3 years ago 2
The wisdom of kabbalah is not so complex.Humility,simplicity,oneness with the universe of your perception.Understanding that in knowing more you percieve just how little you do know.
sharpasaspear 4 years ago
George Berkeley born in Ireland, 1685 was saying the same exact thing, this world does not exist but in your mind, and was attacked by someone with a lesser mind, Dr Samuel Johnson, who kicked a rock and said, I refute you thus...
iolml 4 years ago
One of the best videos I have seen on youtube, whoever put this on here, thank you.
yawehking 4 years ago
I completely agree!
lysergicaddict 4 years ago
Other states of consciousness are truly so amazing. Some people can not imagine from the other side of the fence. Hard to see over.
mytubecomment 4 years ago
A is A. Reality exists outside of us. Get over it.
Ninthletter 4 years ago
This video has sparked my theological imagination, thanks.
Some Christians hesitate to look at this stuff for fear it is idolatry/heresy. If you want to look at some of these types of ideas from a Christian perspective, check out Process theology. Theologians like Whitehead, Cobb, & Hartshorne are a good start.
dutchessmisha 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
such ignorance in physics, such ignorance in spirituality, such ignorance in philosophical dualism.
such simplified world view.
As a Jew, I find this kind of child like thinking about deep thinking humiliating.
Then again, maybe most people don't see it.
superdiza 4 years ago
Why does this knowledge need to be Kabalah??? This is common knowledge.. Not just Kabalah.
awake303 4 years ago 4
A long time ago qabalah DID mean common knowledge. This just goes to show what people have been fed for so long to believe otherwise.
lysergicaddict 4 years ago 2
"There are as many ways to Truth as there are human faces"
lysergicaddict 4 years ago 2
amen brother!
johnnnnycage 3 years ago
the obstacle with kabbalah is staying connected after the drudgery of everyday using the same tools get repetitive and you know it works but your ego/opponent constantly second guesses you and manipulates your reason and thoughts
before you know it, the suddenly syndrome, you are in the dark.
there needs to be a book on this ways to stay connected to the light that i have felt profoundly before
hypegurux94 4 years ago
Excellent video, thanks for posting. Just wondering how Columbus was able to identify all the unusual things in the new world then? These things were new to his mind too, just as the ships were new to the natives.
jannkerrry22 4 years ago
they say the indians couldnt see the ships because they had never heard of them, but like, aren' they seeing them?
alsalamano 4 years ago
There was a slightly cruel but very useful cognitive psych experiment done on kittens... The kittens all lived in isolation with cones on their heads and were ONLY exposed to horizontal lines, not vertical. After living their first 3 months of life like this, the kittens were put in real-world situations. They were crashing into vertical lines because they had no mental construct to recognize them.
dutchessmisha 4 years ago
This is the greatest video out there, bar none. ARI: Thanks again. Keep em coming:)
Satori1800 4 years ago
Might I suggest reading "the Crack in the Cosmic Egg" by Joseph Chilton Pearce. While I do still find some troubling assertions presented in this book, it is far more "scholarly", and does not make such painfull "leaps of logic" as does Kabbal (Well enough outside the Lunatic fringe). Never forget that humanities basic pecreption of "reality" or "truth" overall is on far shakier ground than our perception of Physical reality. Be skeptical, it's GOOD for your thinking! =)
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
Is the new born child no one? Your example is self contradictory. The child was there.
jsupana 4 years ago
"Is the newborn child no one" ???? How does it die if it is, as you say, "no one"? You obviously missed the point entirely. =P
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
Yes I must have missed your point. I thought you were saying that the tree fell in the forest on a new born child and no one saw it fall would the child die. In this example I thought that you were denying the new born child as an observer. I do think that the new born child is someone. Therefore this someone ( the new born) is the observer who perceives the tree falling on top of him or her. So if this is not what you were saying can you please clarify?
Thank you
Peace
jsupana 4 years ago
I myself do not agree with these teachings but not, as far as I understand, for the same reasons as you. I do think that it make sense to fully understand as many positions as possible to see if my own world view is able to stand up to scrutiny.
jsupana 4 years ago
As I said. As a phylosophical aproach to the exploration of perception, fine, but to suggest physical reality exists ONLY in the mind is preposterous. According to kabbal, the newborn, having no preconcieved notion or awareness of a tree, should not be harmed by it. A complete assinine assumption. =P
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
Honestly, a lot of soldiers "never saw it comming", but have the scars to prove the bullets were pretty damn real. You can drive a truck through the assertions of Kabbal. As with most inane religious thought, it's assertions are pushed well beyond any reason or usefullness, into the lunatic fringe.
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
In some of the other teachings on Kabbala on Youtube posted by this same user, the claim is made that a person can inherit conceptions from their parents and therefore they would not be a blank slate at birth.
jsupana 4 years ago
The solders knew they were in a battle or at least they knew of the existence of deadly weapons. The premises of Kabala are not as inane as they may appear at first. I do think that as presented here they are incorrect but they are worth contemplation simply because they do have some degree of logic based on our subjective experiences as thinking beings.
jsupana 4 years ago
There are examples of people doing all sorts of strange things that we would think should cause their death or disfigurement and they walk away unscathed. The condition of the mind directly does color our experience of reality in both mundane and profound and ways.
jsupana 4 years ago
The most profound support for these counterintuitive concepts and the reason we should not dismiss them too quickly is found in the current theories of quantum physics. As far as I understand, this theory is currently the most accurate theory available for understanding the behavior of subatomic particles, and therefore the entire basis for our physical reality.
jsupana 4 years ago
Early Childhood studies of environmental reactions would seem to dispel "inheritence" outright (no evidence). Given our limited ability to observe imperical evidence, theories supported w/ minor evidence may need serve as our understanding of physics at the sub-atomic level, however one must be not equate sub with macro (variables of mass and complexity). Kabbal suggest a reality for which evidence/observation discounts outright with ease.
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
I also disagree with this Kabalistic view of inheritance. I only mentioned it to show that the baby was from their point of view the observer and not a "blank slate" which you seemed to assert. What evidence do you have that babies are "blank slates". I still do not understand your point on the baby in the forest as a way of refuting Kabalist assertions.
jsupana 4 years ago
The sub-atomic and our larger scale experience of reality do not seem to behave consistently, but are you denying that the observer plays a role on the fundamental building blocks of that reality?
jsupana 4 years ago
A matter of mixed definitions I suppose. Philosophically speaking, surely what IS reality to US but perception and subsequent attempts to overcome limitations to "know" it. But to lob this philsophical conceptualization of "reality" into matters of material science (Physical Reality), and on this, suggest physical properties ought to be alterable merely though impossed conception, or accidental misconception, is simply misguided.
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
Kabbal mixes two unlike definitions of "reality" to form one somewhat immature and misguided conclusion. Pearce himself makes some leaps in this as well, which I found discomforting, but his overall approach is far better reasoned.
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
The human mind is not the sharply honned instrument a we give it credit for. It is prone to error, easily manipulated, often forms irrational conclusions and decifers observation with poor accuracy. As for our memories, studys prove time and time again, they are largely edited and falsified by the ego. true "reality" for ourselves, and of the world, does seem like a far quest considering all that we do understand of ourselves, but somehow we still seem to muddle through all right. =) peace!
RainbowMonkeeMittens 4 years ago
I have been following Kabbalah for years now and love it. I know that people misunderstand the principles because of the EGO and the five senses. In some way it is to bad they don't want to change. I also know that some feel what's in it for me selfish feelings.
ksks69 4 years ago
now i'm totally cofused..thanks a lot
rumit99 4 years ago
lol....its all I can say. I can create some other sick theory and gather my followers...These also can be the fake prophets....
darijo203 4 years ago
IF I CLOSE MY EYES I CAN WALK THRU WALLS!?!?! DIDN'T HE JUST SAY THAT?!...i'm sueing for my broken nose...
Francintino 4 years ago
what are those people's view of the discovery of HHo?
thegorilla69 4 years ago
a frame made of steel
inside a shell made of water
sand an plexieglass? it looks like
knightenjr 4 years ago
this is like the philisophical theory of sology.
AndrassyJoseph 4 years ago
first of, the indian example does not make any sense, whow do we know for sure that this actually happened? who was there to record the event?
Second, we see all the time things we have never seen before, and we still "SEE THEM".
Never anybody has ever recorded sombody going through an object just because they never saw it before.
what about babies, they never saw anything at all they should be able to go through anything then?
Just because an idea sounds nice, it does not mean it is true.
aliroula 4 years ago
Which book is the one to start with? And should I try to find someone who have read it to help me understand? Is it working even if I read an English version? Could I use audio? Lot of questions. Is someone willing to help me get started?
Censeo 4 years ago
Thanks for sharing this video.
Its so close to the ideas that the Vedas present. Vedas talk about "Absolute Real" is uncreated and unchanging, i.e. Pure Consciousness which pervades Universe.
I also would like to suggest to take a look at 'Bhagavad Gita' (song of god) to understand more about this. You could check URL: arshabodha org/ab/wcms/en/home/teachings/bhagavadgita/index.html
tatvamasi123 4 years ago
Similar ideas exists in spiritual traditions, kabbalah, suffism, veda etc.
My opinion is that they are good ways for personnal improvment and achieving inner peace as long as they are not taken too literray and mixed with the physical world as this video seems to suggest.
aliroula 4 years ago
what about babies? their perceptions of what is and what shouldn't be is formed yet. but you never see babies walking through walls.
franc3861 4 years ago
DNA my friend. DNA is the ego, and it was passed on from its parents.
OneRyt 4 years ago
babies can't walk...
AndrassyJoseph 4 years ago
FANTASTICO!
XAVIERKAKY 4 years ago
There is no spoon.. ;)
Thorbass1 4 years ago
So how did 'emotions' evolve from 'non-living' matter?
av1611truth 4 years ago
4 billion years of evolution by natural selection.
BruceForsythe 4 years ago
i hope you are kidding
Francintino 4 years ago