The newer CRV's are probably one of the worst cars i've ever driven. I'd be more comfortable being stabbed in the back multiple times than sitting in the pieces of cardboard Honda calls seats.
@FordFanatic59 It's actually a nice car. Everything seems well thought out and very intuitive. I wouldn't want one but it is a decent car that I wouldn't mind driving on a long trip.
@immortal4942 not bad for the converter itself. not bad enough to bother about anyway. it heats up your trans fluid, and this not being a performance car, it probably cant dissipate that heat well enough.
I can do it in like 10 seconds. . . Mine was just 2.0 i-vtec. . . .
FunnehVideo 6 months ago
Needs shorter gear ratios! It has a peppy 2.4 liter engine!
SeadGBosnia 7 months ago
ye i drove my mom's 2011 crv, acceleration is so shitttttt lol
prolarism 8 months ago 2
Seems like a new Honda to me. They arent the fastest (even though this one needs to complete its break in cycle) and their interiors are horrid.
Motorfordtoyota 8 months ago
haha my jeep which only has a little more hp is so much faster
drippinblood28 9 months ago
The newer CRV's are probably one of the worst cars i've ever driven. I'd be more comfortable being stabbed in the back multiple times than sitting in the pieces of cardboard Honda calls seats.
FordFanatic59 10 months ago
@FordFanatic59 It's actually a nice car. Everything seems well thought out and very intuitive. I wouldn't want one but it is a decent car that I wouldn't mind driving on a long trip.
chris000089 7 months ago
You suck, my cr-v touches 100 in 11 seconds
wolfkidgirl 11 months ago
I got an 07 LX with the 2.4 K24, the sucker can fly!!!
2fast4all 1 year ago
you can do torque launching to improve timing. hold brakes, hold gas, let go of brakes. bad for the torque converter but it helps a lot.
immortal4942 1 year ago
@immortal4942 not bad for the converter itself. not bad enough to bother about anyway. it heats up your trans fluid, and this not being a performance car, it probably cant dissipate that heat well enough.
pepene93 10 months ago
My 2003 CR-V do 100 in 9 seconds. This engine is great as for this power, i can beat a lot of cars with stronger engines....
grey91pl 1 year ago
Yikes, that's painfully slow
stanbernadino 1 year ago
@stanbernadino
I drove a similar CR-V with about a thousand more kilometres on the odometre, and it felt noticeably quicker.
motormusique 1 year ago
@motormusique I don't belive it
chris000089 3 months ago
@motormusique believe**
chris000089 3 months ago
@motormusique 12 sec to 0 to 60goos here in brazil we have the 2.0 w/ 156 hp and it's very slow!i think this engine is better!
Guilhermeezinhooo 1 year ago
Official timing is 11.3s for 2.4L 5AT version
korshm 1 year ago
@korshm dude that info is wrong. CR-V does 0-60 in 9 sec. Fit does it in 10.3. Insight in 10.8sec. THe 4 cylinder Rav 4 takes 12 sec.
MusicMan0007 1 year ago
@MusicMan0007 4 cyl. Rav does not take 12 sec.
bbfreak101 1 year ago
Slow ass due to the old 5 AT . The 6MT cr-v is a lot faster than this.
TheEuroperules 1 year ago
The engine screams all the way to 6 500 rpm like your torturing it. not enough power to move the heavy crossover. :(
cameronmci 1 year ago
@cameronmci
It runs 0-60 in the low to mid 8's. That is class leading as far as 4 cylinder CUVs go.
What in the hell are you talking about it doesn't have enough power to move itself???
sleeksilver 1 year ago
From a dead stop I can get to 60 in 7-8 seconds.
manco82 1 year ago
@manco82 well i dont share your opinion
i own a crv 2.4 ivtec and a passat 2.0t
the passat is the one that accelerates in 7 sec because it weights the same as the crv and it has a 200hp engine the crv accelerates in the mid 10s
vegetablelon 1 year ago
10.3 sec, kinda slow
4MATICbenz 1 year ago
@4MATICbenz Its like shitzu trying move a horse. of course its slow. the engine can barley move a honda accord. not to mention a crv.
d10230 1 year ago