Do you want to learn what enlightenment really is?Is your quest for truth beginning to feel like running around in circles?Wake up the dormant power within your spirit.Sleep no more, THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM
Sheldrake is a brilliant scientist. However, I wish he could stop referring to animals as "it" as if they were inanimate objects. He, of all people, should understand that this is not the case.
Pretty amazing stuff. Two points here: (1) Telepathy may exist; (2) Animals are intelligent, emotional creatures not so unlike ourselves. It sure seems to me that killing and eating animals that are mentally equivalent to a three-year-old human is pretty close to killing and eating a three-year-old human. Why is one okay and not the other? Because they are not one of us so we lack recognition of the extent of their similarity and so do not imagine their perspective and thus we feel no empathy?
Thank you so much Mr. Sheldrake for showing skeptics we're ALL connected, animals included! I hope this helps people to be more compassionate to animals.
@nancyantia skeptics are never happy. they're always looking for something to disprove so that they can get people to ignore things they can't see that are really there. it's about time unexplained things got mentioned :)
this is not fascinating its totally normal everyone knows that animals have a way of senseing danger before it happens.humans do to,have you ever felt like something bad was going to happen and it did?
James Randi has debunked these animals. They are nothing but attention seekers and charlatans (especially the cats). They have their gullible owners completely fooled.
Randi will save us all from our stupid selves and our deceptive pets.:)
@marilynnblock Uh, no, they can't and neither can you or anyone else. There has never been a shred of scientific evidence of telepathy or any other supernatural abilities. All such anecdotal reports have natural explanations.
@keeg021985 wrong. you and others need to get out more. how would you know? have you traveled to every country? The Japanese corporately funded it and proved it in the early 90's. I was there. Where were you? ah wait you were still coming out of your nappies. Ah well, better get out more and travel the world away from ignorant western scientific skeptical rubbish. Just because those small minded academic buffoons haven't accepted it, doesn't mean it isn't a reality in lands further afield. :-)
@earthacademy Uh, ok. I assume you also believe in sky gods, bigfoot, leprechauns, Santa Claus, etc. After all, one shouldn't use the scientific method or utilize one's reason to determine what the EVIDENCE suggests. "Ignorant western scientific skeptical rubbish' got you on the internet idiot. "Academic buffons' taught you to read and write. You sound like one of those people who stupidly chose not to go to college and earn a degree, or was tossed out, and now carry a chip on your shoulder.
@keeg021985 its not about belief kid,its about experience.Of your list Big Foot (& UFOs) are valid phenomena.Actually reading Sci-Fi in the 70's taught me English,& everything else I needed working in 15 companies in 5 countries,was self taught. Education is a limitation for certain brain types. See Chris Langan, who is a bouncer/farmer but still has the highest IQ in the US. He hates the education system by the way. Many in the paranormal world use scientific method, skeptics just use arrogance
@earthacademy Yeah. Go load up the bong again and have some more smokee..If something can't pass analysis with standard scientific method protocols, it's not real.
hold their faith to be true- when really most christians for example, dont even practice it routinely, but then require proof for something remarkable like these discoveries and leave belief behind.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I understand your frustration at the scientific community's almost unanimous rejection of Sheldrake's theory, but sarcasm does not replace science. The fact of the matter is that "morphic resonance" is a useless theory. It explains as much as solipsism (the idea that nothing exists but my mind and it creates all of reality as I experience it), which is precisely nothing at all.
If by "ego" you mean consciousness, then I agree that this is a very important topic which remains to be solved. Rupert Sheldrake, however, adds nothing to our understanding of consciousness. He might as well be postulating invisible faeries as the source and cause of consciousness.
@mavaddat "adds nothing" - that statement is a bit of stretch, more rationalistic supercilious ego talking there. I think studying a subject is always going to be 100 times better than most of the armchair ego brigade: who just sit around and say: "bah humbag!" :-)
@earthacademy Thank you for your totally vapid response. You could have reduced the number of words in your comment by writing, "You only think that way because you are egotistical."
But this is just an attempt at psychologizing my motivations for my comment rather than actually suggesting anything that Sheldrake's theory adds. Newton was very egotistical, yet advanced science more than anyone in his time.
When a theory proposes nothing but magic, we can safely reject it.
@mavaddat Well son, the more blinkered ego you use,the more it will blind you from actual truth. As as a Futurist I would tell you to reject the education system, stop recycling & regurgitating academia, & stop being so linear sequential, rationalistic and left brained (hierarchical power battling = inferiority complex). To activate any kind of psychic awareness, plus Visual Simultaneous awareness means letting go of that part of the mind. Sheldrake is promoting VSI in his method. It is valid.
If I were to call you a stupid moron for not knowing that, I would be using my ego, a way to secure my own intelligence. Being above that I know that knowledge comes from knowing what one once didn't and has nothing to do with actual superiority. The ego feels the need to stand on others to secure its own worth, where as the ego free of superiority complexes knows its own worth without comparison, or contrast.
@Juefawn I would say a vast majority of academics and so called western scientists suffer from an "inferiority complex". When you do meet them you discover them to be so left brained,hierarchical & quite nerdy. Thus they obviously don't get out much,& so their limited opinion on worldly matters,especially such things as psychic ability is beyond their grasp of understanding.I certainly saw that at the Royal society.More like trainspotters or Otaku - good at one thing.
@earthacademy It's apparent from your writing that YOU are the one that suffers from an 'inferiority complex.' I'm in the middle of a ph.d. program and can state that most of the graduate students and professors I've met are robustly confident people. You are clearly a college drop out who now believes formal academic education is inferior to reading wikpedia. I would suggest that you go take a writing course and at least learn how to punctuate and construct grammatically correct sentences.
@keeg021985 Haha. No I sold my first software at 16. Thus got a job and got experience...not theory. As a born right brainer, academia served no purpose for me. Left brainer's conform to their surroundings, others break free of it. Nikola Tesla (right brainer) was a college drop out and still is our greatest scientist. My complaint and others here, is your arrogance (of youth and the supercilious limitations academics wallow in). There is still far more to see out there. A Phd is a bit of paper.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Dr. Sheldrake finds hitherto inexplicable cases of apparent causation-at-a-distance, and then applies the theory of morphic fields and resonance to them in retrospect. This is not good science, however, since his theory isn't actually making any predictions about where we should expect to find morphic resonance at work.
Until he can make positive predictions about as-of-yet unobserved phenomena (as opposed to the ad hoc approach he uses now) scientists will continue to ignore his research.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I find that you get the best results if, while meditating , you take a clove of fresh garlic and any one of Rupert's books in the form of a suppository. less noise in the channel..you know what I mean?
I agree that mediation trials should be looked in to. I have a significant increase in psychic activity after mediating (short and long term improvements)
I love rupert sheldrake, but I wish he'd include pre-post-meditation trials in his human telepathy research to see whether meditation makes a difference (I think it will/does).
Rupert Sheldrake is brilliant! He's a renowned biologist, author (75 scientific papers and many books), Former fellow at: Cambridge Univ., Harvard and the Royal Society. Now he's a research scholar at Trinity College, Cambridge. He is a leading researcher into brain/consciousness science.
Do you want to learn what enlightenment really is?Is your quest for truth beginning to feel like running around in circles?Wake up the dormant power within your spirit.Sleep no more, THE-HIDDEN-SPIRITdotCOM
DawnTharpe 1 year ago
Sheldrake is a brilliant scientist. However, I wish he could stop referring to animals as "it" as if they were inanimate objects. He, of all people, should understand that this is not the case.
alexanderjohnstone 1 year ago
Pretty amazing stuff. Two points here: (1) Telepathy may exist; (2) Animals are intelligent, emotional creatures not so unlike ourselves. It sure seems to me that killing and eating animals that are mentally equivalent to a three-year-old human is pretty close to killing and eating a three-year-old human. Why is one okay and not the other? Because they are not one of us so we lack recognition of the extent of their similarity and so do not imagine their perspective and thus we feel no empathy?
theslothmonkey 1 year ago
sorry, i missed the very first thing about cats that made the audience laugh...
something like 'their ability to name when their owners ....' can someone please fill me in here? thanx
SweetSoundOfGrace 1 year ago
Thank you so much Mr. Sheldrake for showing skeptics we're ALL connected, animals included! I hope this helps people to be more compassionate to animals.
nancyantia 1 year ago
@nancyantia skeptics are never happy. they're always looking for something to disprove so that they can get people to ignore things they can't see that are really there. it's about time unexplained things got mentioned :)
hennah11 1 year ago
this is not fascinating its totally normal everyone knows that animals have a way of senseing danger before it happens.humans do to,have you ever felt like something bad was going to happen and it did?
DONPODIOCHI 2 years ago
@DONPODIOCHI yep. problem is most of us don't follow it up
hennah11 1 year ago
James Randi has debunked these animals. They are nothing but attention seekers and charlatans (especially the cats). They have their gullible owners completely fooled.
Randi will save us all from our stupid selves and our deceptive pets.:)
Essanach 2 years ago
@Essanach James randi fans are like a cult, whatever proven paranormal investigation they get, the more skeptic they are :)
dalefantom 2 years ago 2
...hahaha!! so true!!!!!!!
sylvia13ps 2 years ago
People and animals can communicate by telepathic pictures.
marilynnblock 2 years ago 2
@marilynnblock Uh, no, they can't and neither can you or anyone else. There has never been a shred of scientific evidence of telepathy or any other supernatural abilities. All such anecdotal reports have natural explanations.
keeg021985 1 year ago
@keeg021985 wrong. you and others need to get out more. how would you know? have you traveled to every country? The Japanese corporately funded it and proved it in the early 90's. I was there. Where were you? ah wait you were still coming out of your nappies. Ah well, better get out more and travel the world away from ignorant western scientific skeptical rubbish. Just because those small minded academic buffoons haven't accepted it, doesn't mean it isn't a reality in lands further afield. :-)
earthacademy 1 year ago
@earthacademy Uh, ok. I assume you also believe in sky gods, bigfoot, leprechauns, Santa Claus, etc. After all, one shouldn't use the scientific method or utilize one's reason to determine what the EVIDENCE suggests. "Ignorant western scientific skeptical rubbish' got you on the internet idiot. "Academic buffons' taught you to read and write. You sound like one of those people who stupidly chose not to go to college and earn a degree, or was tossed out, and now carry a chip on your shoulder.
keeg021985 1 year ago
@keeg021985 its not about belief kid,its about experience.Of your list Big Foot (& UFOs) are valid phenomena.Actually reading Sci-Fi in the 70's taught me English,& everything else I needed working in 15 companies in 5 countries,was self taught. Education is a limitation for certain brain types. See Chris Langan, who is a bouncer/farmer but still has the highest IQ in the US. He hates the education system by the way. Many in the paranormal world use scientific method, skeptics just use arrogance
earthacademy 1 year ago
@earthacademy Yeah. Go load up the bong again and have some more smokee..
keeg021985 1 year ago
@earthacademy Yeah. Go load up the bong again and have some more smokee..If something can't pass analysis with standard scientific method protocols, it's not real.
keeg021985 1 year ago
i love the fact of people (with no evidence)
hold their faith to be true- when really most christians for example, dont even practice it routinely, but then require proof for something remarkable like these discoveries and leave belief behind.
ryan626 3 years ago 2
Ehm, where's the evidence? Where's those video's?
unsound64 3 years ago
Mate, this is great! Where can I see the rest of it?
susiesorgenfrei 4 years ago
Thanks for uploading this!
fondiziac 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I understand your frustration at the scientific community's almost unanimous rejection of Sheldrake's theory, but sarcasm does not replace science. The fact of the matter is that "morphic resonance" is a useless theory. It explains as much as solipsism (the idea that nothing exists but my mind and it creates all of reality as I experience it), which is precisely nothing at all.
mavaddat 4 years ago
I thought science was sarcasm!
ossiorn 4 years ago
then whats the ego and what is it for
weatheredeyec57 3 years ago
If by "ego" you mean consciousness, then I agree that this is a very important topic which remains to be solved. Rupert Sheldrake, however, adds nothing to our understanding of consciousness. He might as well be postulating invisible faeries as the source and cause of consciousness.
mavaddat 3 years ago
indeed correct sir.
weatheredeyec57 3 years ago
Why do you think the "world of science" rejects Sheldrake's theory? I don't understand that.
You can't put science in one word. There are various sections and many of them are both wrong and right.
Biochips1 3 years ago
@mavaddat "adds nothing" - that statement is a bit of stretch, more rationalistic supercilious ego talking there. I think studying a subject is always going to be 100 times better than most of the armchair ego brigade: who just sit around and say: "bah humbag!" :-)
earthacademy 1 year ago
@earthacademy Thank you for your totally vapid response. You could have reduced the number of words in your comment by writing, "You only think that way because you are egotistical."
But this is just an attempt at psychologizing my motivations for my comment rather than actually suggesting anything that Sheldrake's theory adds. Newton was very egotistical, yet advanced science more than anyone in his time.
When a theory proposes nothing but magic, we can safely reject it.
mavaddat 1 year ago
@mavaddat Well son, the more blinkered ego you use,the more it will blind you from actual truth. As as a Futurist I would tell you to reject the education system, stop recycling & regurgitating academia, & stop being so linear sequential, rationalistic and left brained (hierarchical power battling = inferiority complex). To activate any kind of psychic awareness, plus Visual Simultaneous awareness means letting go of that part of the mind. Sheldrake is promoting VSI in his method. It is valid.
earthacademy 1 year ago
@earthacademy I see you're actually incapable of providing arguments and reasons. Figures.
mavaddat 1 year ago
Its a defense mechanism.
Ex:
If I were to call you a stupid moron for not knowing that, I would be using my ego, a way to secure my own intelligence. Being above that I know that knowledge comes from knowing what one once didn't and has nothing to do with actual superiority. The ego feels the need to stand on others to secure its own worth, where as the ego free of superiority complexes knows its own worth without comparison, or contrast.
:)
Juefawn 2 years ago 7
@Juefawn I would say a vast majority of academics and so called western scientists suffer from an "inferiority complex". When you do meet them you discover them to be so left brained,hierarchical & quite nerdy. Thus they obviously don't get out much,& so their limited opinion on worldly matters,especially such things as psychic ability is beyond their grasp of understanding.I certainly saw that at the Royal society.More like trainspotters or Otaku - good at one thing.
earthacademy 1 year ago
@earthacademy It's apparent from your writing that YOU are the one that suffers from an 'inferiority complex.' I'm in the middle of a ph.d. program and can state that most of the graduate students and professors I've met are robustly confident people. You are clearly a college drop out who now believes formal academic education is inferior to reading wikpedia. I would suggest that you go take a writing course and at least learn how to punctuate and construct grammatically correct sentences.
keeg021985 1 year ago
@keeg021985 Haha. No I sold my first software at 16. Thus got a job and got experience...not theory. As a born right brainer, academia served no purpose for me. Left brainer's conform to their surroundings, others break free of it. Nikola Tesla (right brainer) was a college drop out and still is our greatest scientist. My complaint and others here, is your arrogance (of youth and the supercilious limitations academics wallow in). There is still far more to see out there. A Phd is a bit of paper.
earthacademy 1 year ago
Sheldrake's researches are plausible. Other scientists are lacking of evidence, that's why they reject Sheldrake's theory.
Biochips1 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dr. Sheldrake finds hitherto inexplicable cases of apparent causation-at-a-distance, and then applies the theory of morphic fields and resonance to them in retrospect. This is not good science, however, since his theory isn't actually making any predictions about where we should expect to find morphic resonance at work.
Until he can make positive predictions about as-of-yet unobserved phenomena (as opposed to the ad hoc approach he uses now) scientists will continue to ignore his research.
mavaddat 4 years ago
OMG HES SOOO CORNY
Cashcrop650 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I find that you get the best results if, while meditating , you take a clove of fresh garlic and any one of Rupert's books in the form of a suppository. less noise in the channel..you know what I mean?
shameoncanada 5 years ago
why would it not?
less noise in the channel.
myownmyth 5 years ago
I agree that mediation trials should be looked in to. I have a significant increase in psychic activity after mediating (short and long term improvements)
msie821 5 years ago
I love rupert sheldrake, but I wish he'd include pre-post-meditation trials in his human telepathy research to see whether meditation makes a difference (I think it will/does).
go to his web site at sheldrake dot oh are gee
nonlocalkaviraj 5 years ago 2
Rupert Sheldrake is brilliant! He's a renowned biologist, author (75 scientific papers and many books), Former fellow at: Cambridge Univ., Harvard and the Royal Society. Now he's a research scholar at Trinity College, Cambridge. He is a leading researcher into brain/consciousness science.
vigwig 5 years ago 10
he is very upper class; public school boy ; friend of prince charles ; lives in a nice house in north london ; someone else should make a comment
albrechtsponge 5 years ago