Why on Earth are these people criticizing the theory of ABIOGENESIS (which is still legitimate) And they act as if it was the theory of EVOLUTION. Those are separate objects of study! Evolution, suggested by Darwin is explaining speciation and changes in organic populations on Earth, not the origin of the very first proto-life. God!
Well, this vid should prove beyond a doubt that Darwinists and Evolutionists are not in the least stupid. Facts are facts, and if you'll notice, the majority of the facts used here were discovered by brilliant evolutionary theorists. The conclusions that can be drawn from their discoveries has impelled some scientists to alter the theory. That's the way science works. Theories change, as a matter of course. Read "Double Helix" by Jim Watson - he was wrong a dozen times before he was right.
For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be. -- psalm 139:13-16
God is real. If you don't believe me ask Him. If you don't want to know Him you won't. If you seek Him to want to know Him He will reveal himself to you. He,s not trying to send people to hell . He's done everything keep you out the choice is yours. Ask Jesus to save you before it's to late!
WOW in Chapter the Professor Emeritus says he received doubts about his published theory! What was awesome about this to me that he 'published' his acknowledgment! ... Wonderful stuff! Got to see the next chapter!
@ChrisnStarry what's wrong with being an animal??? I mean, we might have individual sapience, but as a species, and as organisms we are the same life form from this planet!
19.Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20.For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
So your logic is, that 99% of genes is junk so its useless. Remember we only use 10% of our brain, should disgard the rest as useless. Because we don't know what certain things that don't mean we dismiss or disgard them. Problem with humans are they can't say they don't know. Instead they force false info or create them to make there beliefs or so called theories true. Follow the facts and logic and you will see what's what.
@deadlyedley we dont only use 10% of our brain. thats an urban myth. every part of our brain has a function. we simply dont use every single part of our brain at the same time
Yes; there is evolution for adaptation but not for speciation. NO amount of selective breading of any species can change it into another species. Once a dog, always a dog.
This guy quotes arguments in lectures today that where refuted 50 years ago, I'm more likely to buy American Grizzly magazine, than his book (that's not very likely at all, by the way!)
An Intelligent agent is NOT a simple explanation. These buffoons propose that agent to be god - a creative agent so complex it's not even possible to describe!!!
Name one other intelligent agent that magically creates.
ID can't possibly be a scientific a theory, when it's not even a testable hypothesis!
@wgbutler777 Stephen Meyer is a very well spoken man, but I've heard him debate, and his arguments are rubbish. He essentially compares DNA to a software program and since programs are written by intelligent sources, DNA must have been. Does anyone not see the flaw in this? He also really likes to talk about design engineering. You know what design engineering and biological systems have in common? They both work based on physical properties. Not because they're designed.
Natural selection is not limited to living organisms it's a general principle of applied logic. For example gravity and the speed of a rivers flow, naturally select the distribution of grain sizes deposited on it's bed.
Key question:
Why on Earth are these people criticizing the theory of ABIOGENESIS (which is still legitimate) And they act as if it was the theory of EVOLUTION. Those are separate objects of study! Evolution, suggested by Darwin is explaining speciation and changes in organic populations on Earth, not the origin of the very first proto-life. God!
CreativeVisionary92 4 months ago
Well, this vid should prove beyond a doubt that Darwinists and Evolutionists are not in the least stupid. Facts are facts, and if you'll notice, the majority of the facts used here were discovered by brilliant evolutionary theorists. The conclusions that can be drawn from their discoveries has impelled some scientists to alter the theory. That's the way science works. Theories change, as a matter of course. Read "Double Helix" by Jim Watson - he was wrong a dozen times before he was right.
EmmaOnATangent 4 months ago
For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from you when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in your book before one of them came to be. -- psalm 139:13-16
JehovahIsMyRock 5 months ago
God is real. If you don't believe me ask Him. If you don't want to know Him you won't. If you seek Him to want to know Him He will reveal himself to you. He,s not trying to send people to hell . He's done everything keep you out the choice is yours. Ask Jesus to save you before it's to late!
string1248 1 year ago
@string1248 If the Moronic atheist studied Homochirality and Racemic mixtues, they would know life could never arise by chance!!!
5tonyvvvv 9 months ago
WOW in Chapter the Professor Emeritus says he received doubts about his published theory! What was awesome about this to me that he 'published' his acknowledgment! ... Wonderful stuff! Got to see the next chapter!
daddyman007 1 year ago
To say that you look like a monkey is a slap in your face, nay thou didst not evolved from apes...
exc390 1 year ago
@exc390 you do look remarkably similar to an ape when compared to spiders, tumbleweed or mushrooms, don't you?
bommobiel 7 months ago
@bommobiel No, I looked like my kind a human being, but you can look like an ape for all you want lol!
exc390 7 months ago
We ARE NOT accidental animals!!!
ChrisnStarry 1 year ago
@ChrisnStarry what's wrong with being an animal??? I mean, we might have individual sapience, but as a species, and as organisms we are the same life form from this planet!
CreativeVisionary92 4 months ago
Romans 1
19.Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20.For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
blattt188 1 year ago
This drives Evos. Crazy!!!!
egatz4u 1 year ago
So your logic is, that 99% of genes is junk so its useless. Remember we only use 10% of our brain, should disgard the rest as useless. Because we don't know what certain things that don't mean we dismiss or disgard them. Problem with humans are they can't say they don't know. Instead they force false info or create them to make there beliefs or so called theories true. Follow the facts and logic and you will see what's what.
deadlyedley 1 year ago
@deadlyedley we dont only use 10% of our brain. thats an urban myth. every part of our brain has a function. we simply dont use every single part of our brain at the same time
mebe84 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes; there is evolution for adaptation but not for speciation. NO amount of selective breading of any species can change it into another species. Once a dog, always a dog.
Mr123me321 2 years ago
MaxSafeheaD - if your mind is truly open on this issue I highly recommend Stephen Meyer's latest book, Signature in the Cell.
It looks at all the outstanding theories on the origin of life and shows the weaknesses of each theory.
The simplest and most likely explanation at this point really is that an Intelligent Agent formed the first life.
wgbutler777 2 years ago
This guy quotes arguments in lectures today that where refuted 50 years ago, I'm more likely to buy American Grizzly magazine, than his book (that's not very likely at all, by the way!)
An Intelligent agent is NOT a simple explanation. These buffoons propose that agent to be god - a creative agent so complex it's not even possible to describe!!!
Name one other intelligent agent that magically creates.
ID can't possibly be a scientific a theory, when it's not even a testable hypothesis!
MaxSafeheaD 2 years ago 2
@MaxSafeheaD
Here, here!
bettySwollox 2 years ago
And if so then it is likely that said Agent also stuck around to guide said life, IMHO.
Perktube1 2 years ago
@wgbutler777 Stephen Meyer is a very well spoken man, but I've heard him debate, and his arguments are rubbish. He essentially compares DNA to a software program and since programs are written by intelligent sources, DNA must have been. Does anyone not see the flaw in this? He also really likes to talk about design engineering. You know what design engineering and biological systems have in common? They both work based on physical properties. Not because they're designed.
TheSeventhSon 2 years ago
"Is life on Earth the product of purely undirected processes like time, chance and natural selection?"
Natural selection is NOT undirected. That should be absolutely obvious to everyone. Not so the makers of this video it seems.
If genes are a language, why is 99% of it inactive "junk?"
MaxSafeheaD 2 years ago
Not "natural selection" smarty. They're talking about life forming....not the process of natural selection which can only work once life is working.
paradelights 2 years ago
Natural selection is not limited to living organisms it's a general principle of applied logic. For example gravity and the speed of a rivers flow, naturally select the distribution of grain sizes deposited on it's bed.
MaxSafeheaD 2 years ago
and yet no complex protein has ever been formed in a laboratory simulating climatic elements, only simple amino acvids.
Perktube1 2 years ago
OH boy, are you in for one hell of a ride!
I highly recommend you watch this from the beginning, you'll most likely need to take it one step at a time.
watch?v=D-G0EHJuEbE
if you insist on being thrown in at the deep end, and I don't think you should but
watch?v=KzPis90OLVA&feature=related
MaxSafeheaD 2 years ago 2
So what? Evolution happened. Fact.
gregrutz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz
"So what? Evolution happened. Fact."
And it continues to happen to this day...
bettySwollox 2 years ago
@gregrutz thnx for that detailed scientific analysis.
mebe84 1 year ago