That is BULLSHIT - I just worked on an election where three candidates raised a lot of money - but FIVE others did not have any money - only 15% of the people in the district voted - and THAT is why one of the three with money WON the election - if people would fucking VOTE - THEN the assholes with money would NOTalways win
I agree that people should be more engaged, like I say I do vote but no matter who wins we end up with the same bullshit, two sides of the same coin. But if more people vote, the rich would still win beacuse people only vote for who the tv tells them to vote for.
For example the UK libertarian party who I support and would actually change teh country for the better will never gain power due to the 'first past the post' system which discriminated against small parties.
The Bilderberg group is nothing I worry about - the SILENT people of conscience who are letting the Biderberg group gain control - THEY are the ones I worry about -
If you vote - you are part of the potential solution - if you DO NOT VOTE - you are giving the Biderberg bastards EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT - anothe SILENT voice of dissent.
and I suppose you have evidence - proof - names and details? Do you even know what district Ron Paul is from or how many seats there are in the House? - Those would be things to learn more than all the time you must have spent digging up secret information about him - but IF YOU DO HAVE PROOF - will it hold up in court of law?
Out of 220 Million voter age people, 1% are not allowed to vote - yet 50% make a choice to not vote - I would not focus on the 1% - so much - I would think that a portion of that 50% should be the focus - you know?
yeah - but is is like this - 57% did not vote in the last election - and that 57% probably wanted a Congress that would impeach - but they did not vote - so we did not get a good congress elected - see?
anyway - do you see what I am saying - try an experiment -get 10 people together and do a mock election - make three people (or 30%) always vote for evil - and make the rest all in favor of Good (70%). Now make it so over half of that 70% does not vote at all (so at least 4 people do not vote)- and hold an election of good vs evil - it will at best come out a 3 to 3 tie (in wich case evil will rig it and win) UNTILL YOU ADD BACK SOME OF THE NON-VOTERS NOTHING WILL CHANGE - see?
I vote.
But whats the point when both sides are funded and controlled by the same group of people. Politics are a puppet show for the sheeple.
WakeUpBritain2009 2 years ago
That is BULLSHIT - I just worked on an election where three candidates raised a lot of money - but FIVE others did not have any money - only 15% of the people in the district voted - and THAT is why one of the three with money WON the election - if people would fucking VOTE - THEN the assholes with money would NOTalways win
WAKE THE FUCK UP
voteforpeace08 2 years ago
I agree that people should be more engaged, like I say I do vote but no matter who wins we end up with the same bullshit, two sides of the same coin. But if more people vote, the rich would still win beacuse people only vote for who the tv tells them to vote for.
For example the UK libertarian party who I support and would actually change teh country for the better will never gain power due to the 'first past the post' system which discriminated against small parties.
WakeUpBritain2009 2 years ago
Also we can not elect the people who are truly deciding policy such as people who are in the bilderberg group to name one.
WakeUpBritain2009 2 years ago
The Bilderberg group is nothing I worry about - the SILENT people of conscience who are letting the Biderberg group gain control - THEY are the ones I worry about -
If you vote - you are part of the potential solution - if you DO NOT VOTE - you are giving the Biderberg bastards EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT - anothe SILENT voice of dissent.
Look at what the REAL problem is.
141BlackDoggie 2 years ago
I completly agree, but the problem lies in that there are very few people worth voting for that won't further the agenda of the nwo.
Maybe people such as you and me should run for election? I think that is the only way to have legitimate people in government.
WakeUpBritain2009 2 years ago
you said "evil" - that is a concept in the Bible - Do you believe in evil - how about MAGIC or SORCERY?? oooo lol
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
jesus christ? the constitution is more important than all of this non-sense - see ya later
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
are you speaking Biblically - or were you the victim of a lot of random act of evil from all people?
I am so sorry - you are obviously hurting BAD
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
clowns usually look good wearing tin foil hats
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
and I suppose you have evidence - proof - names and details? Do you even know what district Ron Paul is from or how many seats there are in the House? - Those would be things to learn more than all the time you must have spent digging up secret information about him - but IF YOU DO HAVE PROOF - will it hold up in court of law?
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anyway - you see what I am saying?
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
I don't think a politician becomes a "clown" till after they get elected andstart doing bad things - but that is just me.
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
Hundreds of thousands of Americans are NOT ALLOWED their right to vote. It's the process of disenfranchisement of non-violent felons.
All Americans must be allowed to vote. All Americans must be made equal again.
Vote.
.
TainaAtheist1 3 years ago
Out of 220 Million voter age people, 1% are not allowed to vote - yet 50% make a choice to not vote - I would not focus on the 1% - so much - I would think that a portion of that 50% should be the focus - you know?
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
Go NADER/Gonzalez 2008
You have my vote in November
Kold2market 3 years ago 3
WOOT! I'm not for them but you get a woot for 3rd party :) <-That's unity
Organjic 3 years ago
politicians vote. people endorse politicians. we dont vote. we just vote to have other people to do all the voting for us.
oldhacks 3 years ago
yeah - but is is like this - 57% did not vote in the last election - and that 57% probably wanted a Congress that would impeach - but they did not vote - so we did not get a good congress elected - see?
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
"good congress" is an oxymoron.
oldhacks 3 years ago
anyway - do you see what I am saying - try an experiment -get 10 people together and do a mock election - make three people (or 30%) always vote for evil - and make the rest all in favor of Good (70%). Now make it so over half of that 70% does not vote at all (so at least 4 people do not vote)- and hold an election of good vs evil - it will at best come out a 3 to 3 tie (in wich case evil will rig it and win) UNTILL YOU ADD BACK SOME OF THE NON-VOTERS NOTHING WILL CHANGE - see?
voteforpeace08 3 years ago
OK - what do you think about "good Rep" - like Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinch - we need MORE GOOD REPS in the HOUSE
how is that for symantics - are you happy - I do not want you to be upset - lol
voteforpeace08 3 years ago