@kilkolio 1) I told you the dOcumentary from which my information is from. The scientists and people are real, google them if you want to. 2) I haven't used medicine of any type in over 10 years. I stopped medicine use a long time ago because im so healthy and all the diseases that medicine is used to treat is mostly caused by unhealthy eating.
O.K. so the Question comes to mind, how would we feel if we where used for Experimentation.Ohhh let me guess we can't do that to Humans, Humm why!!! we want the Knowledge but we want it at the expense of Animals that a little disgushting to me and a little chicken shit don't you think??? want all the glory but none of the pain !!!
@emilybassett17 God also says homosexuals are ours to torture and stone to death.
Animal testing often causes pain and animals are not given the right to a normal life if they're tested on (they're also often killed after they have no more use to animal testing labs). Medicines also have dangerous side-effects on the animals. Animals have a right not to have their life used for human purposes because they are sentient.
Also in a documentary called "Behind the Mask" by Shannon Keith, they have
gimme the book and verse on that oh shit wait no u cant u pulled it out of ur ass
stop using our medicine then in fact go live out in the wilderness somewhere where no animal killing has been done for the things we humans accomplished
Hmmmmmm................YES PETA IS SO MISGUIDED! But my idea of fair testing would be to use torturing murders to test on. How about we squeeze something good out of the Bundy's and Dahmer's and look at all we could have learned from Charlie Manson if we had used him for testing instead of giving him a free ride at "Club Fed?" They are Guilty! Animals are innocent. I know it will never happen and I do understand the need for it (Animal Testing) but I will never like it...
For all of you. God put animals on this earth for our use and sustainment. yes, cruelty is wrong, as they are God's creations as well. However, they were made for our use.
FUCK PETA I WILL EAT WHAT THE FUCK I WANT!!!!THIS IS THE PROBLEM THE POLITICAL CORECTNESS!!!!THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU HOW TO THINK AND WHAT TO DO!!THEY TAKING OVER US ALL TELLING US WRONG IS RIGHT AND RIGHT IS WRONG!!!!UR NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF IDIOTS!! I LOVE ANIMALS AND LOVE MEAT DOESNT MEAN IM GONNA EAT MY DOG,OR TURTLES OR ANY OF MY OTHER PETS!!!!
@howtokillasnake Now you're talkin! My Father Owned a Pharmacy when I was a child and the only time I ever saw him loose his cool was when life magazine came out with the story of Revlon dropping acid into rabbitts eye's to test make up. I had NEVER heard him drop an F Bomb till that day. We were given Boxes and ORDERED to pull ALL REVLON OUT OF his Fing STORE....Scared me to death! Never used Revlon again!
@gatorfresh Yes, Cosmetics is not needed, They do not help people in anyway at all, Shampoo doesn't usually have harmful Affects on animals, Cosmetics Is uneeded, But Medicine needs to be tested, I would rather an animal died than a human.
@gatorfresh Did you even watch the Video? The Facts are in your face and you don't even see it, They don't injure the animal in anyway, and the benifits are well worth a Dead rat or Monkey. Millions of ways to fight disease have been discovered through animal research, it's perfectly reasonable.
@zachery1123 Not only have we discovered cures for humans, but animal testing also leads to animals being saved. Like vaccines, there had to be a trail period of "testing" before being brought out for my dog to get its shots. One animal was sacrificed to save many.
listen here u sick fuck LET ME TEST ON YOUR FUCKING STUPID ASS animals are NOT NEEDED like you said we use human tussue now THERE IS A HUGE DIF. BETWEEN THE TWO GENETICS ! ANIMALS DONT REACT THE SAME WAY WE DO TO ALL THEM CHEMICALS LIKE WE DO ! AND AS FAR AS AIDS IF THIS WORLD DIDNT HAVE THE DUMB FUCK WHO DECIDED TO FUCK A MONKEY WE WOULDNT HAVE AIDS SO THANK YOUR OWN KIND ON THAT ANIMALS DID NOTHING TO HUMANS BUT WANT A LOVING HOME JUST LIKE HUMANS DO! SO GET YOUR SHIT STRAIGHT YOU IDIOT!
@62808ashleylynch oh so you are willing to take the place of a rat and have tests done on you to see if we can find a cure for AIDS? By all means recruit yourself. If you think animal testing is that bad then have the scientists use your life instead.
@62808ashleylynch Also by the way, we can test on human tissue, but when it comes to a complex body and how everything will react to a certain medication or procedure, we cannot always be sure of the outcome. That is why we use an animal such as a rat rather than a human to test these medications. for example if you have any siblings and they were diagnosed with cancer and the only way that they could survive was from a medical cure found in animal testing, would you support it?
@tasteegold777 The similarities between species aren't always blatant like that. I mean, you can see the similarity between Homo Sapiens and Chimpanzees easily. But with things like rats, you have to go into greater detail. You have to go into the individual cells, organs, (like I mentioned, same organs perform the same functions), tissues, and so on. It's simple: 90% of the rat's genome matches perfectly with the human's genome. It's the 10% of different DNA that makes us different. Simple.
@tasteegold777 And by the way, almost every single mammal in the world have the same organs that perform the same function. The heart pumps blood, the lungs take in air, the neural network collects, processes, stores and transmits information the bones provide structure, the muscles allow movement, etc. For every known species of MAMMAL, these organs perform the same function. Why do you have such a hard time swallowing the thought of shared DNA between species?
@tasteegold777 And to me, anyone who can look in the face of an innocent, helpless, sentient child who is dying from AIDS and does not want to help them, even at the cost of an animal's life, is not only a monster, but a completely irrational monster. Compare a monster who kills animals to save the lives of human babies to another monster who kills babies to save animals. Sidenote: When scientists kill animals, you call it murder, when PETA kills animals, they are better than scientists?
@tasteegold777 No, it is the 10% of different DNA that makes us humans. We share that much DNA with rats, because millions of years back, we originated from a common ancestor. No I am not a vivisector.
@tasteegold777 Buddy, why the anger? I'm not trying to insult you, I am simply presenting an opposing view of animal testing. This is supposed to be a rational discussion between two people with different ideas.
@tasteegold777 I think that eventually, we will have no need of animal testing. For now, it is "The Norm" so to speak, but alternatives are being used whenever possible. For example, pregnancy testing used to involve killing a rabbit, but they have now been replaced by over the counter products, so really, we're evolving past the need for animal testing. I agree that it is a horrific process, but don't fret about it. It's almost gone.
@tasteegold777 And I will admit that there are ways we could improve animal testing to make it more bearable for the subjects themselves, but this is what we have for now.
Yeah those damn scientists, always making shit up just to take your money. This is starting to sound like some sort of conspiracy theory. And seriously, go and look up how much DNA we share with rats, While you're at it, go look up how much DNA you share with a banana, you'd be surprised.
@tasteegold777 Animal Testing is the best option available to us at the moment. When alternatives can yield the same results, we will use them. It's simple! If we were to use an alternative that did not yield the same information, that 97% would go up.
The truth is that animal research isn't necessary because lifestyle reasons are most of the cause of the diseases people suffer from. Congrats to the pharmaceutical companies for making people pop pills instead of making lifestyle adjustments to cure their conditions. It's sick and twisted, and the United States does everything backwards, and they are obviously not concerned with the health of the citizens.
@christinal3106 Give me some examples of PHYSICAL diseases. (NOT mental/emotional. Something that is caused by a pathogenic substance or genetic defect) that can be cured through lifestyle adjustments.
Wow. You are so wrong about everything! The scary part is people actually believe you. Whoa. If you make a Youtube video so many people think your right. But in fact no...your so wrong about everything!!! Do some real research. PETA doesn't just make stuff up, they get their information from real sources, not youtube videos made by someone who has to much time on their hands and doesn't know anything about animal testing.
@MeatfortoeatALT PETA doesn't just make up the things they say. They give the source of where they found it. Like the drug and health association or a respected Dr. or scientist. If you look at their statements and see where they are actually from, it not from vegans.
@fireout700 If you could save the life of a rast or a baby, who would you save? Now consider this, you can't save one without killing the other.
"Even if animal testing did lead to a cure for AIDS, we would be against it." That means you are saving the life of a rat, while leaving thousands of babies in Ethiopia to die painfully.
@MeatfortoeatALT The thing is, there are ways that we can save both. Magically there are some labs who don't test on animals and can still find curse and new medicines. There isn't one way anymore, so we need to switch to a better way. Your facts are wrong.
@fireout700 As soon as new alternatives are found, labaratories will eagerly make the switch. I will back PETA up on the issue that animal testing should not be used for things like perfumes and such, but I condone it for things like virus research. And sometimes animal testing is the only option.
@fireout700 When we test on animals, we don't test for exactly the same thing everytime. Sometimes we can't do tissue cultures since we need to know how the organism as a whole is affected. And we can't test on every type of cell there is since, for one thing, there are more than likely hundreds of different types, but then all of the different cells are interconnected. So, we need to make sure that the product won't affect how the different types of cells interact.
@fireout700 Thing is, animal testing yields more results and information as opposed to alternatives. Don't misinterpret that, if there exists an alternative to animal testing that yields the same amount of information as animal testing, labs would most likely be more than willing to make that switch. It's not like they enjoy it.
@MeatfortoeatALT You keep saying labs will make the switch. If we spent less useless time testing on animals and researching new testing techniques they would be even better then the ones we've got!
... Are all problems that can be solved/ treated through animal experimentation. Two thirds of medical breakthroughs awarded by the nobel prize used animal research.
Frankly, alternatives aren't the best solution in most cases. Sometimes, experimenting on a living organism is the only method that yields results.
@fireout700 And our domestic animals, (The ones that PETA supports) benefit from animal testing as well. 1/3 of medicines/ vaccines used by humans. (Made possible through animal testing) Are used on animals as well. To give some examples, Rabies vaccine, insulin, cancer treatment, antibiotics, tumor treatment, and depression treatment are all used on animals as well as humans.
@MeatfortoeatALT have you ever seen those comercials that say..if you or a loved one have ever taken this drug, and died, had a heart attack, miscarried, one of your eyeballs fell out ext. Do you think it worked on the animals? Yea it did, but animals are not people. So even a small number of medications recalled does a lot of damage. I THINK ANIMAL TESTING IS TORTURE TO ANIMALS. "Even if animal testing did lead to a cure for AIDS, we would be against it." <----- I AGREE
@fireout700 That's only a small percentage. Rats share 90% of their DNA with us. That means, if a drug works on a rat, there is a pretty damn good chance it will work on humans. In every mammal, the same organs perform the exact same function. The heart pumps blood, the lungs take in oxygen, the stomach digests food and so on. So of a drug to help with heart disease works in an animal, with a heart that performs the same function as it does in a human being, it will probably do the same...
In a human. And about the AIDS thing, are you saying that you care more about the lives of rats and monkeys as opposed to I don't know, Ethiopian children DYING HORRIBLY and BEGGING DESPERATELY for help?
Without animal testing, we would not have insulin, so if you were diabetic (like me) you would have suffered a horrible seizure and died by now. If you got polio, BAM! DEAD!, if you got depression, you'd be hanging in a closet, bitten by a rabid dog? DEAD.
And most scientists who work on animals are animal lovers themselves. 2/3 of medical breakthroughs were made possible through animal research. Did you watch the video?
@fireout700 I take back that last point, but I will say this, when an alternative is found to be better than animal testing, we will make that switch.
@fireout700 There are scientists that do animal research, AND there are scientists that look for alternatives.
Until the ones who are looking for alternatives find one, we need both types. Have you ever gone to a hospital and gotten IV painkillers? How about taken medicine for a headache? Guess what kind of life that was tested on?
(HINT: It's not Plants, Fungi, Protists, Bacteria, or Archaebacteria.)
@fireout700 And I'd like to make it clear that I AM NOT supporting animal testing for things like perfumes, shampoo and so on, but I DO support it for medical research that is going to save or improve someone's life.
@MeatfortoeatALT and I'd like to make it clear that I do not support animal testing in anyway. And instead of looking for the cancer cure, we should be trying to make new things to test on other then animals. Animal testing is wrong. period!
@fireout700 That means that disease research would come to a COMPLETE STOP. Do you know how many lives that would cost, or do you care more about the "Poor bunnie" to worry about people suffering in hospitals, slowly and brutally dying? Like I said before, there are scientists working on animals, and there are scientists working on alternatives. WE NEED BOTH. (Until suitable alternatives are found, of course)
@MeatfortoeatALT The whole "If we took animals out, almost all med. reasearch would come to a stop" That is total bullshit. The only reason we test on animals is becuase its cheap. More money in your pocket if you use an animal. You can do anything to an animal and it will be legal, if you call it med. reasearch.
If they used only tests for medical reaserch on important diseases tissues and computer would be eoungh. If we wont to make tests on new cosmetics, new headache pills, alcool, make up, pet's food etc etc it's obvious they need animals, it would cost to much without them. The point is: that is all useless shit. USEFUL medical research is not a big part of all the animal tested products,they just care bout money. "There's not such a high goal to justify such a horrible atrocity" A. Einstein.
@MeatfortoeatALT There are other forms of research then animal testing. Plenty of companies and research labs don't. They kill so many of their animals, because there are so many animals. Its a sad thing, and they wish they never had to do it. But they do. There are SO many breeders and puppy mills that are pumping out animals that we can't possibly keep them all. Which is horrible! And its really sad but there is no other choice. No kill shelters suck even worse. They keep animals till they die
@fireout700 As this video states: When other methods of testing are able for use, we use them. About puppy mills, I do believe we should put a little more control on how many animals we breed. And besides, animal testing can be useful. We share 90% of our DNA with rats, so if you can cure a disease in rats, there's a good chance you can cure the disease in humans.
And you can say that the animals arrive in bad condition, but you only save 1 in every 300 animals you get. It's obvious you people aren't even TRYING to find homes for animals. Other organizations like The Humane Society actually TRY!
lol said the retarded fuckthad that never stepped in a lab, i work in a lab, so i know more shit than you that jerks off to PETA videos taking it like the christian take the bible, fuck off and never take a drug again, die if you get sick.
PETA constantly complains about this or that thing done to animals without adequate research, and always without qualification. Remember how uptight they got about mulesing sheep in Australia? As if the pain of having maggots eating the flesh around your anus away was preferable to losing a flap of skin at the start of your life.
How can shit be dumb? It doesn't have a nervous system (Or any bodily system, for that matter), and is classified as waste. Oh, and by the way, you keep on ragging on technology, yet you... are on a computer right now. And obviously regularly visit youtube. What?
change a lot of thing and win a lot of cause so don't blame them like this they are the only organism that do care about the animal and I really don't agree with all the things that's been said on this video because we are so differents to animal... Since 2000 we are hable to save mice of cancer... and we still don't know how to save human... because yes we have the same organs but our constitution inside is very differents I know what I'm talking about I'm studying in that... Peta Yes!!
I think that peta is a great organism and it's the only one that it's big anough to help! I can tell you that I study in research and I can tell that animal testing is completly in the wrong way many and many ways can replace the animals... why do we continue to use animals... because it's easier to take a rabbit instead of pass 2 hours to create a reproduction. In fact, the use of cell it's better and about 90% of the experimental animal arrive with no conclusion... Peta can help and they ...
though animal research is to some extent necessary vivisection is completely something that should not be done and some research like the ones involved with behaviorism and psychology should be outlawed as human behavior is much too different from species with a less complex brain, it is a complex subject and many of the medicines and drugs available on the market do more harm than good i am also against animal testing for cosmetic reasons and the fashion/beauty industry should be boycotted
@ssuperslugful That's not entirely accurate we didn't just poof out of nowhere.By the way animal testing helps animals too not just humans. Why don't you wake up and stop watching outdated animal torture footage and see how animal testing is today and how strict the rules and regulations are. The world is bad enough we don't need brainwashed hippies burning buildings down.
@LAURENBILL10 Don't call someone an idiot when your spelling and punctuation is just horrifying. Animal testing has cured certain cancers for animals like dogs. You can't be an animal killer if it's already dead retard.
@ssuperslugful Animal testing is useless? Fact without animal research and testing the average human life span would still be 30 to 40. Besides animal test is not always some cold dark torture room filled with dirty cages. They exaggerate to gain stupid weak minded followers like you. They were even caught staging footage.
So put down that bong and stop being so damn retarded.
FOR ALL YOU PETA LOVERS. if you hate animal research then you can just suck it.
without animal reseach millions of people would be dead in the bible it says animals were put on this earth to BE HUNTED they are extremly important. Even the vice president of PETA uses insuline. unless you hate life hate PETA
Hey hippie shouldnt you be rescuing helpless cows or something? PETA only consists of girls gays and pussies who have no life or friends so they go about protecting the earth from what it has been doing for the past billion years.
@Vleesball We euthanize animals that are brought to us because they are in fatal condition, or that we cannot rehabilitate. We believe that animals would rather be dead than be in suffering, especially when they cannot be adopted because they have been deemed un-adoptable by the law. (ie. they killed someone, or they bit a child, were in dogfights, etc.)
Nice recitation of the official PETA apologist BS line, but there's two pesky facts it doesn't wish away:
1) PETA organizes violent protests of shelters that euthanize while doing the same thing themselves.
2) PETA kills over 85% of the animals it "saves". I have a real hard time accepting that only 1 in 300 animals taken in by PETA are saveable, especially given their oft-stated desire for the extinction of all domesticated pets.
@NiceGuyCody Yes that is a problem. The protests against shelters are generally not actually planned by the head people at PETA but someone lower down who is just a animal-loving hippie that doesn't want to look into the actual facts. Not everyone at PETA knows what the hell is going on. Also the killing of the 85% of animals is simply due to the fact that they ARE trying to remove all domesticated animals because they aren't natural. I am not personally sure about that.
Actually, she devoted her life to lying and sucking the money out of our pockets. Don't you get it? PETA is a giant leech, and they use people like you as hosts. They don't even spend that much of their income to help animals. Most of it is spent on the Walk in Freezer.
@MeatfortoeatALT That makes a lot of sense then. If they kept all the money then people would get on their trail. So they have to spend it on some thing to make it look like they don't have ask much money as they do. Yea..that makes more sense then people actually caring about animals.
PETA are extemists. I'm not saying they shouldn't exist at all, I'm saying they are way too extreme. If they actually got to do whatever they'd want, we'd be living like cavemen. srsly? releasing ALL the animals? Peta, let's start small like more humane ways of killing animals? or only killing for need not want? or both? don't get carried away, peta.
PETA kills animals. They make millions every year and would rather use the money to use scare tactics with children. They killed 85% of the animals that people trusted to find homes for. Hmmm SPCA adopts out 80% of their animals.. Get SPCA stickers and volunteer for them, because they care about finding lost animals god homes.
Okey, there's NO DOUBT animal testing helps us to advance...I myself have chronic disorder, and hadn't it been for animal testing, there's no way I would probably even have lived today, so if anyone's thankful for animal testing..IT'S ME PERSONALLY! But, there's no argument to why we shouldn't in today's modern, technological world support the research of testing without animals, and see to it that IT advances aswell? The truth also remains that animals don't chose this life, right?
peta is about drama, i agree alot of their statements are false my little brother can walk again after a car accident ,thanks to the spinal cord research on monkeys. i don't agree with testing for cosmetics or other crap like that, but we do have the science community to thank for alot of the advancements in tx/meds, that are directly due to animal research. if your loved one needed meds/tx to save their life, would you refuse it. if it was possible because of animal testing?
the creator of this video speaks the truth, people need to stop having a fantasized view of life, life can be cruel, violent and savage, our ancestors thousands of years ago know that, humans are animals there for we have as much right to eat another animal's meat as a wolf is allowed to eat a deer, remember the circle of life from the lion king, that is a philosophy we need to go by. ps i love animals and i eat meat and hate Peta
@cartoonkingforeever This is not about the circle of life. If this is indeed so important, test on humans. Let a human volunteer to undergo such painful tests. In that case, I'll start testing on babies. The circle of life, they'll stay quiet, who the fuck cares? Lots of babies in the world. You obviously have failed to understand what the "Circle of life" entails. The circle of life has nothing to do with taking advantage of others just because we can.
After 25 years of fighting animal abuse and going against the grain its no surprise that some can find some holes, but the critics of those who are at least trying often have the biggest hole with no room to speak. Also they put animals first, its the sole puprose to represent the animals interest, just like a cancer center is not going to help the homeless veterans or hospitals deal with the sick and dying. I served in the peace corps but via Veg help human healthenvironment, mammals + more
"Many points of great interest emerge from their studies. Here is an example of how a technique adapted for a particular study may be usefully turned onto another. Here also is a striking example of species difference in tissue metabolism, and yet another warning against uncritically extending the conclusions of animal experiments to man."
(Leading article on "Insulin and the Heart", British Medical Journal, September 24 1955, page 780.) curedisease . net
"Dr Banting, Canada's medical hero, who is popular and erroneously credited with the discovery of insulin by extirpating the pancreases of thousands of dogs, did not cause diabetes, but stress." (J.A. Pratt, "A Reappraisal of Research Leading to the Discovery of Insulin", Journal of the History of Medicine, Vol. 9, 1954, pages 281-289.)
"The causes of diabetes mellitus remains unknown in both man and animals. In spite of certain species similarities, there are a number of important differences - differences in clinical manifestation, in aetological factors and in the liability to certain long-term complications of the disease."Dr Harry Keen, BSc, M.R.C.P., "Spontaneous Diabetes in Man and Animals", Veterinary Record, July 9 1960, page 557
"There is no laboratory method of inducing diabetes... which is exactly comparable to the clinical condition. At best we can get only crude approximations. The dangers of arguing from one species to another, or even from one strain to another of the same species are certainly not to be neglected."
(Dr F.G. Young, Professor of Biochemistry at the University of London, Lancet, December 18 1948, pages 955-956.) aahr. org . au
"Unfortunately, the condition of a dog with a small but healthy part of his pancreas left is essentially different from that of a person suffering from diabetes... in human diabetes two factors are present: 1. an essentially progressive lesion absent in experimental animals; and 2. the detrimental effect of improper diet."
(Hugh MacLean, M.D., D.Sc., Lancet, May 26 1923, page 1043.) mrmcmed. org vivisectionresearch. ca health . org . nz curedisease. net
"The scientists Banting and Best were incorrectly credited with the discovery of insulin."Dr M. Barron, "The Relation of the Islets of Langerhans Diabetes with Special Reference to Cases of Pancreatic Lithiasis", Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, November 5 1920"Arguments based on the insulin requirements of the depancreatised dog and cat applied to human diabetes are quantitatively dangerous."Dr F. G. Young D.Sc. PhD. F.R.S. British Medical Journal, Nov 17 1951 pages 1167-1168curediseasenet
" When they removed the pancreas from dogs, cats, and pigs, the animals became diabetic. But their symptoms led researchers to conjecture that diabetes was a liver disease, throwing diabetes research off track for decades.
"The production of insulin originated in a wrongly conceived, wrongly conducted, and wrongly interpreted series of [animal] experiments." (Roberts, F., BMJ1922, P1194)
“Animal studies are done for legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive value of such studies for man is meaningless.”; - Dr James D. Gallagher; Director of Medical Research; Lederle Laboratories; Journal of the American Medical Association; March 14 1964.; therefore humans are the real 'guinea pigs' when exposed to a substance only 'tested' in animals. For real science see curedisease . net curedisease . com navs . org mrmcmed . org pcrm . org navs. org vivisectionresearch. ca
You're fuckin retarded they have found 28 cures or treatment for AIDS in primates none of them work in humans. And 70 cures and treatments for diabetes in primates and other nonhuman animals none of them worked on humans. Do you know why that is? Because cats and monkeys are not humans. And this is information on Northwestern universities web site.
yo PSVIDZ08 i just want to t=say tht ur vid i completely agree with but i jst want to noe if u r a scientist or something related to the medical industries
I think that if PETA and all the whiny little bitches out there who agree with them want us to stop testing on animals then they should offer up themselves as test subjects
Don't donate to PETA, they fuckin suck. A bunch of hypocrites. If you care about animals and don't want your money to just get pocketed, donate to other animal protection services like the ASPCA or the Humane Society.
Join People Eat Tasty Animals 2day!(I'm going 2 get lotsa hate mail but I enjoy Peta's suffering) When U join Peta u get paid 1 cent 4 every animal u kill! U get 10 cents for blowing up a bank! & We'll pay U 1 dollar 4 ripping of of good video games & 1.0 dollars 4 being nude in our next terrorist act!(Peta = they worship Hitler)
@killyoubitch27 No, did yours? Is that why you feel you need to take out your unwanted aggressions on an innocent person eating a fucking cheeseburger? Get over yourself, and know someone before you judge them.
@killyoubitch27 WE DON'T!!! Did you know that Peta insults overweight people with the "Save the whales" billboard? You'll probably come up with some excuse. There is no reasoning with you whiners who can't accept how the world works. None of this makes sense to you though, does it?
@Meatfortoeat I eat cheeseburgers and steaks the stuff that makes me mad is dogs and monkeys cats you name it being tortured in a lab so companies can test solvents or detergents and other stupid shit and then there killed and cut open to see what kind of damage it did to their internal organs that's the shit that makes me fuckin mad.
@Meatfortoeat We'll check out Huntington life science 95% percent of the animals there are tested on for industrial chemicals and products. They're not curing AIDS or cancer over there.
@killyoubitch27 No animal experiements are curing aids or cancer (or anything else)...Dr. Richard Klausner, as director of the US National Cancer Institute, plainly states:
"The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse... We have cured mice of cancer for decades - and it simply didn't work in humans."
@killyoubitch27 I don't see the difference between being against factory farming vs animal testing. They are both happening for the same reasons. They are both inflicting "Unnecessary cruelty" towards sentient, feeling, and, if you ever get the extraordinary chance to meet any, surprisingly cute and sweet beings. To eat meat and detest lab testing is nothing short of downright hypocritical.
@Meatfortoeat Hey, Meat For.... To Eat, how does the world work? I'm curious, please show me exactly how it does, and expose how little vegans understand, and how immoral and insane it is to want to help in any way possible. Fat people know they are fat. Am I supposed to tip toe around fat people now? Wow. You called a fat person... fat! Crazy.
might I introduce bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) and isolated chicken eye (ICE). two alternatives to live animal testing for ocular safety testing. In September of 09 the CVI developed a new NDV vaccine...an alternative to live poultry testing. the 3r's wasn't developed for shits and giggles. do your research kids...before you rant out of your ass about how necessary animal testing is
One day our technology will be obsolete enough and we'll have to look back at all the animals we killed and just say ''oh well'' if the whole 2012 thing were to happen I'd say we damn well deserve every bit of suffering after reading all this pro animal testing shit that sounds just as smug as the PETA propoganda
PETA SUCKS!!!!
michelem76 2 days ago
P.E.T.A Sucks the Sweaty balls of a dead goat (P.E.T.A was the one that killed it)
Oh and Meat Is Fucking Tasty.... Mmmmm KFC
MrShine07 1 week ago
@kilkolio 1) I told you the dOcumentary from which my information is from. The scientists and people are real, google them if you want to. 2) I haven't used medicine of any type in over 10 years. I stopped medicine use a long time ago because im so healthy and all the diseases that medicine is used to treat is mostly caused by unhealthy eating.
Peaceeverbody 2 weeks ago
O.K. so the Question comes to mind, how would we feel if we where used for Experimentation.Ohhh let me guess we can't do that to Humans, Humm why!!! we want the Knowledge but we want it at the expense of Animals that a little disgushting to me and a little chicken shit don't you think??? want all the glory but none of the pain !!!
grndcontrol07 3 weeks ago
@grndcontrol07
we wouldnt like it
thankfully no other animals are self aware and live in subconscious nature
kilkolio 2 weeks ago
several scientists explain the flaws and failures of animal testing. They also have former employees at labs tall about how the animals are treated.
Peaceeverbody 3 weeks ago
@emilybassett17 God also says homosexuals are ours to torture and stone to death.
Animal testing often causes pain and animals are not given the right to a normal life if they're tested on (they're also often killed after they have no more use to animal testing labs). Medicines also have dangerous side-effects on the animals. Animals have a right not to have their life used for human purposes because they are sentient.
Also in a documentary called "Behind the Mask" by Shannon Keith, they have
Peaceeverbody 3 weeks ago
@Peaceeverbody
gimme the book and verse on that oh shit wait no u cant u pulled it out of ur ass
stop using our medicine then in fact go live out in the wilderness somewhere where no animal killing has been done for the things we humans accomplished
kilkolio 2 weeks ago
Hmmmmmm................YES PETA IS SO MISGUIDED! But my idea of fair testing would be to use torturing murders to test on. How about we squeeze something good out of the Bundy's and Dahmer's and look at all we could have learned from Charlie Manson if we had used him for testing instead of giving him a free ride at "Club Fed?" They are Guilty! Animals are innocent. I know it will never happen and I do understand the need for it (Animal Testing) but I will never like it...
BeckeyGirard 1 month ago
For all of you. God put animals on this earth for our use and sustainment. yes, cruelty is wrong, as they are God's creations as well. However, they were made for our use.
emilybassett17 1 month ago
people
eating
tasty
animals
ohiofan20111 2 months ago 3
Use the people on death row They've committed a worse crime than the animals used have and guess what... watch those taxes go down.
GavriellaMichal 2 months ago in playlist More videos from PSVIDZ08
@GavriellaMichal AMEN AMEN AMEN!
I saw this after I posted almost the same thing above!
BeckeyGirard 1 month ago
peta should force heir members to stop taking flu shots, vaccines, and any other modern medicine/drug.
TheYoukaichannel 2 months ago
@TheYoukaichannel RIGHT!
BeckeyGirard 1 month ago
the using alternatives is law in the usa as well
Benweaves 3 months ago
thank u Researchers and a big fuck u to the terrorist group knowen as peta
Gofankok 4 months ago
FUCK PETA I WILL EAT WHAT THE FUCK I WANT!!!!THIS IS THE PROBLEM THE POLITICAL CORECTNESS!!!!THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU HOW TO THINK AND WHAT TO DO!!THEY TAKING OVER US ALL TELLING US WRONG IS RIGHT AND RIGHT IS WRONG!!!!UR NOTHING BUT A BUNCH OF IDIOTS!! I LOVE ANIMALS AND LOVE MEAT DOESNT MEAN IM GONNA EAT MY DOG,OR TURTLES OR ANY OF MY OTHER PETS!!!!
TheImmortalmetal 4 months ago
@TheImmortalmetal Love the message! the language is harsh but I get your point!
BeckeyGirard 1 month ago
testing for disease is MUCH different than testing for cosmetics. New hairspray or cure for cancer? Cosmetic testing needs to stop
howtokillasnake 4 months ago 4
@howtokillasnake we need to learn how to be auto controlled in order to do that, humans just can't :(
I support medical research, but not anything else that isn't really necessary
TheYoukaichannel 2 months ago
@howtokillasnake Now you're talkin! My Father Owned a Pharmacy when I was a child and the only time I ever saw him loose his cool was when life magazine came out with the story of Revlon dropping acid into rabbitts eye's to test make up. I had NEVER heard him drop an F Bomb till that day. We were given Boxes and ORDERED to pull ALL REVLON OUT OF his Fing STORE....Scared me to death! Never used Revlon again!
BeckeyGirard 1 month ago
@howtokillasnake
why should we kill plants and spare animals? that's speciesim
kilkolio 2 weeks ago
@zachery1123
Testing cosmetics on animals is cruel and pointless
so is shampoo .Animals do get injured sometimes.
I do agree however if testing on animals could help Aids and cancer
then fair enough,that would be ethical
gatorfresh 6 months ago
@gatorfresh Yes, Cosmetics is not needed, They do not help people in anyway at all, Shampoo doesn't usually have harmful Affects on animals, Cosmetics Is uneeded, But Medicine needs to be tested, I would rather an animal died than a human.
zachery1123 6 months ago
@zachery1123 I Agree,medicine has to be treated,medical research has to be done on animals
i have medicine to help me live which is tested on animals
these PETA wacos would rather we all die lol
gatorfresh 6 months ago
@gatorfresh yet they use the same meds but want you to die. this is why they need to be stopped
dunhillsupramk3 5 months ago
animal testing is cruel pointless and wrong
gatorfresh 6 months ago
@gatorfresh Did you even watch the Video? The Facts are in your face and you don't even see it, They don't injure the animal in anyway, and the benifits are well worth a Dead rat or Monkey. Millions of ways to fight disease have been discovered through animal research, it's perfectly reasonable.
zachery1123 6 months ago
@zachery1123 Not only have we discovered cures for humans, but animal testing also leads to animals being saved. Like vaccines, there had to be a trail period of "testing" before being brought out for my dog to get its shots. One animal was sacrificed to save many.
UltraEpicLoser 6 months ago
FFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCKKKKKKKKK YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU! STOP ANIMAL TESTING!
62808ashleylynch 6 months ago
listen here u sick fuck LET ME TEST ON YOUR FUCKING STUPID ASS animals are NOT NEEDED like you said we use human tussue now THERE IS A HUGE DIF. BETWEEN THE TWO GENETICS ! ANIMALS DONT REACT THE SAME WAY WE DO TO ALL THEM CHEMICALS LIKE WE DO ! AND AS FAR AS AIDS IF THIS WORLD DIDNT HAVE THE DUMB FUCK WHO DECIDED TO FUCK A MONKEY WE WOULDNT HAVE AIDS SO THANK YOUR OWN KIND ON THAT ANIMALS DID NOTHING TO HUMANS BUT WANT A LOVING HOME JUST LIKE HUMANS DO! SO GET YOUR SHIT STRAIGHT YOU IDIOT!
62808ashleylynch 6 months ago
@62808ashleylynch oh so you are willing to take the place of a rat and have tests done on you to see if we can find a cure for AIDS? By all means recruit yourself. If you think animal testing is that bad then have the scientists use your life instead.
HamPieProductions 6 months ago
@62808ashleylynch Also by the way, we can test on human tissue, but when it comes to a complex body and how everything will react to a certain medication or procedure, we cannot always be sure of the outcome. That is why we use an animal such as a rat rather than a human to test these medications. for example if you have any siblings and they were diagnosed with cancer and the only way that they could survive was from a medical cure found in animal testing, would you support it?
HamPieProductions 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 The similarities between species aren't always blatant like that. I mean, you can see the similarity between Homo Sapiens and Chimpanzees easily. But with things like rats, you have to go into greater detail. You have to go into the individual cells, organs, (like I mentioned, same organs perform the same functions), tissues, and so on. It's simple: 90% of the rat's genome matches perfectly with the human's genome. It's the 10% of different DNA that makes us different. Simple.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 And by the way, almost every single mammal in the world have the same organs that perform the same function. The heart pumps blood, the lungs take in air, the neural network collects, processes, stores and transmits information the bones provide structure, the muscles allow movement, etc. For every known species of MAMMAL, these organs perform the same function. Why do you have such a hard time swallowing the thought of shared DNA between species?
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 And to me, anyone who can look in the face of an innocent, helpless, sentient child who is dying from AIDS and does not want to help them, even at the cost of an animal's life, is not only a monster, but a completely irrational monster. Compare a monster who kills animals to save the lives of human babies to another monster who kills babies to save animals. Sidenote: When scientists kill animals, you call it murder, when PETA kills animals, they are better than scientists?
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 No, it is the 10% of different DNA that makes us humans. We share that much DNA with rats, because millions of years back, we originated from a common ancestor. No I am not a vivisector.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 Buddy, why the anger? I'm not trying to insult you, I am simply presenting an opposing view of animal testing. This is supposed to be a rational discussion between two people with different ideas.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 I think that eventually, we will have no need of animal testing. For now, it is "The Norm" so to speak, but alternatives are being used whenever possible. For example, pregnancy testing used to involve killing a rabbit, but they have now been replaced by over the counter products, so really, we're evolving past the need for animal testing. I agree that it is a horrific process, but don't fret about it. It's almost gone.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 And I will admit that there are ways we could improve animal testing to make it more bearable for the subjects themselves, but this is what we have for now.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777
Yeah those damn scientists, always making shit up just to take your money. This is starting to sound like some sort of conspiracy theory. And seriously, go and look up how much DNA we share with rats, While you're at it, go look up how much DNA you share with a banana, you'd be surprised.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 Now testing on deathrow people would be a good idea.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 Painkillers are not required to recover from an injury.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 Animal Testing is the best option available to us at the moment. When alternatives can yield the same results, we will use them. It's simple! If we were to use an alternative that did not yield the same information, that 97% would go up.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
@tasteegold777 Actually, we share 90- fucking- percent of our DNA with rats. We share over 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
The truth is that animal research isn't necessary because lifestyle reasons are most of the cause of the diseases people suffer from. Congrats to the pharmaceutical companies for making people pop pills instead of making lifestyle adjustments to cure their conditions. It's sick and twisted, and the United States does everything backwards, and they are obviously not concerned with the health of the citizens.
christinal3106 7 months ago
@christinal3106 true. cancer requires vitamin b 17. ironic its that simple
avenger391482 7 months ago
@christinal3106 Give me some examples of PHYSICAL diseases. (NOT mental/emotional. Something that is caused by a pathogenic substance or genetic defect) that can be cured through lifestyle adjustments.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
Wow. You are so wrong about everything! The scary part is people actually believe you. Whoa. If you make a Youtube video so many people think your right. But in fact no...your so wrong about everything!!! Do some real research. PETA doesn't just make stuff up, they get their information from real sources, not youtube videos made by someone who has to much time on their hands and doesn't know anything about animal testing.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 Can you give me some sources for your claims that ARE NOT from PETA?
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT PETA doesn't just make up the things they say. They give the source of where they found it. Like the drug and health association or a respected Dr. or scientist. If you look at their statements and see where they are actually from, it not from vegans.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 If you could save the life of a rast or a baby, who would you save? Now consider this, you can't save one without killing the other.
"Even if animal testing did lead to a cure for AIDS, we would be against it." That means you are saving the life of a rat, while leaving thousands of babies in Ethiopia to die painfully.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT The thing is, there are ways that we can save both. Magically there are some labs who don't test on animals and can still find curse and new medicines. There isn't one way anymore, so we need to switch to a better way. Your facts are wrong.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700
Most animal testing isn't as bad as it seems. Most of the time, it consists of a routine injection or a change in diet.
Animal testing is only used when it must be used. For example, if scientists were testing the effects of a virus, they would have to use animals.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT just search some animal testing videos on here...they are even worse then they seem.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 As soon as new alternatives are found, labaratories will eagerly make the switch. I will back PETA up on the issue that animal testing should not be used for things like perfumes and such, but I condone it for things like virus research. And sometimes animal testing is the only option.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT but there already are other alternatives that are in use!
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 When we test on animals, we don't test for exactly the same thing everytime. Sometimes we can't do tissue cultures since we need to know how the organism as a whole is affected. And we can't test on every type of cell there is since, for one thing, there are more than likely hundreds of different types, but then all of the different cells are interconnected. So, we need to make sure that the product won't affect how the different types of cells interact.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700 So to sum that up, the human body is just too damn complex and interconnected to do individual tests on tissue cultures.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700 Thing is, animal testing yields more results and information as opposed to alternatives. Don't misinterpret that, if there exists an alternative to animal testing that yields the same amount of information as animal testing, labs would most likely be more than willing to make that switch. It's not like they enjoy it.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT You keep saying labs will make the switch. If we spent less useless time testing on animals and researching new testing techniques they would be even better then the ones we've got!
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 Prove it.
1MarioTheMartian1 7 months ago
@fireout700
"Useless time"
In 1955, Jonas Stalk produced a vaccine for polio using primates as test subjects.
Animal testing was used to produce insulin for diabetics. Isn't one of PETA's most important people a diabetic herself?
Ancient Greek and Roman scientists dissected pigs to study the inner workings of the mammilian body.
Brain tumors, infant malnutrition, depression, infertility, the AIDS virus, Heart disease, leukemia, diabetes, rabies, polio, measles, mumps, rubella, and tuberculosis
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700
... Are all problems that can be solved/ treated through animal experimentation. Two thirds of medical breakthroughs awarded by the nobel prize used animal research.
Frankly, alternatives aren't the best solution in most cases. Sometimes, experimenting on a living organism is the only method that yields results.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700 And our domestic animals, (The ones that PETA supports) benefit from animal testing as well. 1/3 of medicines/ vaccines used by humans. (Made possible through animal testing) Are used on animals as well. To give some examples, Rabies vaccine, insulin, cancer treatment, antibiotics, tumor treatment, and depression treatment are all used on animals as well as humans.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT lets stop calling it animal testing. Lets just call it what it really is, animal torture.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 There can't be good things without sacrifices. And you're not refuting my last point.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT have you ever seen those comercials that say..if you or a loved one have ever taken this drug, and died, had a heart attack, miscarried, one of your eyeballs fell out ext. Do you think it worked on the animals? Yea it did, but animals are not people. So even a small number of medications recalled does a lot of damage. I THINK ANIMAL TESTING IS TORTURE TO ANIMALS. "Even if animal testing did lead to a cure for AIDS, we would be against it." <----- I AGREE
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 That's only a small percentage. Rats share 90% of their DNA with us. That means, if a drug works on a rat, there is a pretty damn good chance it will work on humans. In every mammal, the same organs perform the exact same function. The heart pumps blood, the lungs take in oxygen, the stomach digests food and so on. So of a drug to help with heart disease works in an animal, with a heart that performs the same function as it does in a human being, it will probably do the same...
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700
In a human. And about the AIDS thing, are you saying that you care more about the lives of rats and monkeys as opposed to I don't know, Ethiopian children DYING HORRIBLY and BEGGING DESPERATELY for help?
Without animal testing, we would not have insulin, so if you were diabetic (like me) you would have suffered a horrible seizure and died by now. If you got polio, BAM! DEAD!, if you got depression, you'd be hanging in a closet, bitten by a rabid dog? DEAD.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700
And most scientists who work on animals are animal lovers themselves. 2/3 of medical breakthroughs were made possible through animal research. Did you watch the video?
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700 I take back that last point, but I will say this, when an alternative is found to be better than animal testing, we will make that switch.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT and how can we do that if instead of looking for it, we are testing on animals.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 There are scientists that do animal research, AND there are scientists that look for alternatives.
Until the ones who are looking for alternatives find one, we need both types. Have you ever gone to a hospital and gotten IV painkillers? How about taken medicine for a headache? Guess what kind of life that was tested on?
(HINT: It's not Plants, Fungi, Protists, Bacteria, or Archaebacteria.)
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700 And I'd like to make it clear that I AM NOT supporting animal testing for things like perfumes, shampoo and so on, but I DO support it for medical research that is going to save or improve someone's life.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT and I'd like to make it clear that I do not support animal testing in anyway. And instead of looking for the cancer cure, we should be trying to make new things to test on other then animals. Animal testing is wrong. period!
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 That means that disease research would come to a COMPLETE STOP. Do you know how many lives that would cost, or do you care more about the "Poor bunnie" to worry about people suffering in hospitals, slowly and brutally dying? Like I said before, there are scientists working on animals, and there are scientists working on alternatives. WE NEED BOTH. (Until suitable alternatives are found, of course)
(P.S. an exclamation mark is NOT a period.)
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700 You're not even using logic now.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT The whole "If we took animals out, almost all med. reasearch would come to a stop" That is total bullshit. The only reason we test on animals is becuase its cheap. More money in your pocket if you use an animal. You can do anything to an animal and it will be legal, if you call it med. reasearch.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 Actually, we test on animals because it is the best option available.
MeatfortoeatALT 6 months ago
If they used only tests for medical reaserch on important diseases tissues and computer would be eoungh. If we wont to make tests on new cosmetics, new headache pills, alcool, make up, pet's food etc etc it's obvious they need animals, it would cost to much without them. The point is: that is all useless shit. USEFUL medical research is not a big part of all the animal tested products,they just care bout money. "There's not such a high goal to justify such a horrible atrocity" A. Einstein.
HellPatrol92 7 months ago
PETA is awesome and you all are uneducated about them and what they do. Watch some videos from them. They actually make sense! Whoa...crazy right :p
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 Then why do they kill so many of their animals? Why do they oppose research targeting AIDS and curing it? Do explain.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT There are other forms of research then animal testing. Plenty of companies and research labs don't. They kill so many of their animals, because there are so many animals. Its a sad thing, and they wish they never had to do it. But they do. There are SO many breeders and puppy mills that are pumping out animals that we can't possibly keep them all. Which is horrible! And its really sad but there is no other choice. No kill shelters suck even worse. They keep animals till they die
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 As this video states: When other methods of testing are able for use, we use them. About puppy mills, I do believe we should put a little more control on how many animals we breed. And besides, animal testing can be useful. We share 90% of our DNA with rats, so if you can cure a disease in rats, there's a good chance you can cure the disease in humans.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@fireout700
And you can say that the animals arrive in bad condition, but you only save 1 in every 300 animals you get. It's obvious you people aren't even TRYING to find homes for animals. Other organizations like The Humane Society actually TRY!
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@ssuperslugful
lol said the retarded fuckthad that never stepped in a lab, i work in a lab, so i know more shit than you that jerks off to PETA videos taking it like the christian take the bible, fuck off and never take a drug again, die if you get sick.
xxkwijiboxx 7 months ago
HOW DARE YOU USE A GREAT SONG FOR YOUR SHITTY VIDEO >:d
Anamais666 7 months ago
FUCK ANIMAL TESTING
Anamais666 7 months ago
PETA constantly complains about this or that thing done to animals without adequate research, and always without qualification. Remember how uptight they got about mulesing sheep in Australia? As if the pain of having maggots eating the flesh around your anus away was preferable to losing a flap of skin at the start of your life.
foxinshocks 7 months ago
they kill the homeless dogs in the car right when they let them in
RealFrakun 8 months ago
I EAT TASTY ANIMALS. Enough said.
t3hgraemek 8 months ago
Great video!
MrHockeynut5 8 months ago
@ssuperslugful
@ssuperslugful
How can shit be dumb? It doesn't have a nervous system (Or any bodily system, for that matter), and is classified as waste. Oh, and by the way, you keep on ragging on technology, yet you... are on a computer right now. And obviously regularly visit youtube. What?
PS - Successful troll is successful
abridgeduploader 11 months ago 2
change a lot of thing and win a lot of cause so don't blame them like this they are the only organism that do care about the animal and I really don't agree with all the things that's been said on this video because we are so differents to animal... Since 2000 we are hable to save mice of cancer... and we still don't know how to save human... because yes we have the same organs but our constitution inside is very differents I know what I'm talking about I'm studying in that... Peta Yes!!
joanie515 11 months ago
I think that peta is a great organism and it's the only one that it's big anough to help! I can tell you that I study in research and I can tell that animal testing is completly in the wrong way many and many ways can replace the animals... why do we continue to use animals... because it's easier to take a rabbit instead of pass 2 hours to create a reproduction. In fact, the use of cell it's better and about 90% of the experimental animal arrive with no conclusion... Peta can help and they ...
joanie515 11 months ago
PeopleEatingTastyAnimals
SellTheBenefits 1 year ago
though animal research is to some extent necessary vivisection is completely something that should not be done and some research like the ones involved with behaviorism and psychology should be outlawed as human behavior is much too different from species with a less complex brain, it is a complex subject and many of the medicines and drugs available on the market do more harm than good i am also against animal testing for cosmetic reasons and the fashion/beauty industry should be boycotted
DanteWhite 1 year ago
@ssuperslugful That's not entirely accurate we didn't just poof out of nowhere.By the way animal testing helps animals too not just humans. Why don't you wake up and stop watching outdated animal torture footage and see how animal testing is today and how strict the rules and regulations are. The world is bad enough we don't need brainwashed hippies burning buildings down.
chanze555 1 year ago
@chanze555 how would it HELP animals when its killing them your very stupid u know that oh I forgot your to stupid to even know that u animal killer
LAURENBILL10 1 year ago
@LAURENBILL10 Don't call someone an idiot when your spelling and punctuation is just horrifying. Animal testing has cured certain cancers for animals like dogs. You can't be an animal killer if it's already dead retard.
chanze555 1 year ago
@ssuperslugful Animal testing is useless? Fact without animal research and testing the average human life span would still be 30 to 40. Besides animal test is not always some cold dark torture room filled with dirty cages. They exaggerate to gain stupid weak minded followers like you. They were even caught staging footage.
So put down that bong and stop being so damn retarded.
chanze555 1 year ago
@chanze555 well its KILLING ANIMALS you big bitch
LAURENBILL10 1 year ago
FOR ALL YOU PETA LOVERS. if you hate animal research then you can just suck it.
without animal reseach millions of people would be dead in the bible it says animals were put on this earth to BE HUNTED they are extremly important. Even the vice president of PETA uses insuline. unless you hate life hate PETA
Bregenzer1152 1 year ago 2
Hey hippie shouldnt you be rescuing helpless cows or something? PETA only consists of girls gays and pussies who have no life or friends so they go about protecting the earth from what it has been doing for the past billion years.
aphillips888 1 year ago
@ssuperslugful - have fun burnin
RedNeck7273 1 year ago
@ssuperslugful- god put animals on the earth to be hunted read genesis in the bible
RedNeck7273 1 year ago
@ssuperslugful- i got some news for you hippy the west wasn't won on salads haha
RedNeck7273 1 year ago
If animal research stops, then the majority of biomedical research stops too.
When have you heard PETA say anything about the suffering of people?
TheKitch2 1 year ago
PETA supports are activists with no knowledge of science and only love for animals and not humans.
statickk14 1 year ago
PETA= People Everywhere Testing Animals
igenther99 1 year ago
PETA are bigger hypocritcal scum than muslim fanatics are !
girlsdrinkfeck 1 year ago 2
PETA has a huge freaking freezer where they keep dead dogs cats etc that they killed themself HAHAHA...
PETA PETA PETA.. the fuck man.. its all about money people.
Vleesball 1 year ago 7
@Vleesball We euthanize animals that are brought to us because they are in fatal condition, or that we cannot rehabilitate. We believe that animals would rather be dead than be in suffering, especially when they cannot be adopted because they have been deemed un-adoptable by the law. (ie. they killed someone, or they bit a child, were in dogfights, etc.)
rbiklen 1 year ago
@rbiklen
Nice recitation of the official PETA apologist BS line, but there's two pesky facts it doesn't wish away:
1) PETA organizes violent protests of shelters that euthanize while doing the same thing themselves.
2) PETA kills over 85% of the animals it "saves". I have a real hard time accepting that only 1 in 300 animals taken in by PETA are saveable, especially given their oft-stated desire for the extinction of all domesticated pets.
NiceGuyCody 10 months ago 2
@NiceGuyCody Yes that is a problem. The protests against shelters are generally not actually planned by the head people at PETA but someone lower down who is just a animal-loving hippie that doesn't want to look into the actual facts. Not everyone at PETA knows what the hell is going on. Also the killing of the 85% of animals is simply due to the fact that they ARE trying to remove all domesticated animals because they aren't natural. I am not personally sure about that.
rbiklen 10 months ago
@Vleesball right. That 60,000 ingrid newkirk is really worth devoting her entire life to all those "lies"
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700
Actually, she devoted her life to lying and sucking the money out of our pockets. Don't you get it? PETA is a giant leech, and they use people like you as hosts. They don't even spend that much of their income to help animals. Most of it is spent on the Walk in Freezer.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
@MeatfortoeatALT That makes a lot of sense then. If they kept all the money then people would get on their trail. So they have to spend it on some thing to make it look like they don't have ask much money as they do. Yea..that makes more sense then people actually caring about animals.
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 Why are they spending so much money on the storage of dead animals as opposed to actually spending money on helping the animals.
MeatfortoeatALT 7 months ago
PETA SUCKS INDEED.. but they dont get it wrong..
infact THEY ARE AGAINS people having pets... they want animals to live free and do whatever they want just liek humans.
they want animals to have the same rights as humans :p
Thats why they dont like animal research..cause no one freaking asks the animals.. hey little doggie do you mind if we do some research with you..
Dont you get it ?
Vleesball 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You must not know a lot..because many doctors have said that animal research is NOT necessary. stupid.
theawesomestperso101 1 year ago
You must not know alot..because many doctors have said that animal research is NOT necessary. stupid.
theawesomestperso101 1 year ago
@theawesomestperso101 care to list these doctors?
TheKitch2 1 year ago
Comment removed
theawesomestperso101 1 year ago
PETA are extemists. I'm not saying they shouldn't exist at all, I'm saying they are way too extreme. If they actually got to do whatever they'd want, we'd be living like cavemen. srsly? releasing ALL the animals? Peta, let's start small like more humane ways of killing animals? or only killing for need not want? or both? don't get carried away, peta.
SuperSparky10297 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
PETA kills animals. They make millions every year and would rather use the money to use scare tactics with children. They killed 85% of the animals that people trusted to find homes for. Hmmm SPCA adopts out 80% of their animals.. Get SPCA stickers and volunteer for them, because they care about finding lost animals god homes.
equinelyn 1 year ago
id rather let darwinism take effect and let people who are prone to contract deadly diseases die ending the gene
xmasterfunk 1 year ago
this is the first video i've seen that really tells the truth about animal testing,
katosteen 1 year ago
Okey, there's NO DOUBT animal testing helps us to advance...I myself have chronic disorder, and hadn't it been for animal testing, there's no way I would probably even have lived today, so if anyone's thankful for animal testing..IT'S ME PERSONALLY! But, there's no argument to why we shouldn't in today's modern, technological world support the research of testing without animals, and see to it that IT advances aswell? The truth also remains that animals don't chose this life, right?
qubatuta 1 year ago
peta is about drama, i agree alot of their statements are false my little brother can walk again after a car accident ,thanks to the spinal cord research on monkeys. i don't agree with testing for cosmetics or other crap like that, but we do have the science community to thank for alot of the advancements in tx/meds, that are directly due to animal research. if your loved one needed meds/tx to save their life, would you refuse it. if it was possible because of animal testing?
katosteen 1 year ago
you are so stupid.do you support corporations or do you buy their lies?
youtube:
consumer deception
center for consumer exposed
luxcretia2 1 year ago
the creator of this video speaks the truth, people need to stop having a fantasized view of life, life can be cruel, violent and savage, our ancestors thousands of years ago know that, humans are animals there for we have as much right to eat another animal's meat as a wolf is allowed to eat a deer, remember the circle of life from the lion king, that is a philosophy we need to go by. ps i love animals and i eat meat and hate Peta
cartoonkingforeever 1 year ago
@cartoonkingforeever This is not about the circle of life. If this is indeed so important, test on humans. Let a human volunteer to undergo such painful tests. In that case, I'll start testing on babies. The circle of life, they'll stay quiet, who the fuck cares? Lots of babies in the world. You obviously have failed to understand what the "Circle of life" entails. The circle of life has nothing to do with taking advantage of others just because we can.
unazaine 1 year ago
The animals would be better off being killed for reasearch them just mindlessly killed for no reason.
DinoAvenger14 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
After 25 years of fighting animal abuse and going against the grain its no surprise that some can find some holes, but the critics of those who are at least trying often have the biggest hole with no room to speak. Also they put animals first, its the sole puprose to represent the animals interest, just like a cancer center is not going to help the homeless veterans or hospitals deal with the sick and dying. I served in the peace corps but via Veg help human healthenvironment, mammals + more
VeganMotorcyclePilot 1 year ago
"Many points of great interest emerge from their studies. Here is an example of how a technique adapted for a particular study may be usefully turned onto another. Here also is a striking example of species difference in tissue metabolism, and yet another warning against uncritically extending the conclusions of animal experiments to man."
(Leading article on "Insulin and the Heart", British Medical Journal, September 24 1955, page 780.) curedisease . net
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
"Dr Banting, Canada's medical hero, who is popular and erroneously credited with the discovery of insulin by extirpating the pancreases of thousands of dogs, did not cause diabetes, but stress." (J.A. Pratt, "A Reappraisal of Research Leading to the Discovery of Insulin", Journal of the History of Medicine, Vol. 9, 1954, pages 281-289.)
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
"The causes of diabetes mellitus remains unknown in both man and animals. In spite of certain species similarities, there are a number of important differences - differences in clinical manifestation, in aetological factors and in the liability to certain long-term complications of the disease."Dr Harry Keen, BSc, M.R.C.P., "Spontaneous Diabetes in Man and Animals", Veterinary Record, July 9 1960, page 557
nzavs. org .nz
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
"There is no laboratory method of inducing diabetes... which is exactly comparable to the clinical condition. At best we can get only crude approximations. The dangers of arguing from one species to another, or even from one strain to another of the same species are certainly not to be neglected."
(Dr F.G. Young, Professor of Biochemistry at the University of London, Lancet, December 18 1948, pages 955-956.) aahr. org . au
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
"Unfortunately, the condition of a dog with a small but healthy part of his pancreas left is essentially different from that of a person suffering from diabetes... in human diabetes two factors are present: 1. an essentially progressive lesion absent in experimental animals; and 2. the detrimental effect of improper diet."
(Hugh MacLean, M.D., D.Sc., Lancet, May 26 1923, page 1043.) mrmcmed. org vivisectionresearch. ca health . org . nz curedisease. net
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
"The scientists Banting and Best were incorrectly credited with the discovery of insulin."Dr M. Barron, "The Relation of the Islets of Langerhans Diabetes with Special Reference to Cases of Pancreatic Lithiasis", Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, November 5 1920"Arguments based on the insulin requirements of the depancreatised dog and cat applied to human diabetes are quantitatively dangerous."Dr F. G. Young D.Sc. PhD. F.R.S. British Medical Journal, Nov 17 1951 pages 1167-1168curediseasenet
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
" When they removed the pancreas from dogs, cats, and pigs, the animals became diabetic. But their symptoms led researchers to conjecture that diabetes was a liver disease, throwing diabetes research off track for decades.
"The production of insulin originated in a wrongly conceived, wrongly conducted, and wrongly interpreted series of [animal] experiments." (Roberts, F., BMJ1922, P1194)
noratmedicine 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
“Animal studies are done for legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive value of such studies for man is meaningless.”; - Dr James D. Gallagher; Director of Medical Research; Lederle Laboratories; Journal of the American Medical Association; March 14 1964.; therefore humans are the real 'guinea pigs' when exposed to a substance only 'tested' in animals. For real science see curedisease . net curedisease . com navs . org mrmcmed . org pcrm . org navs. org vivisectionresearch. ca
noratmedicine 1 year ago
You're fuckin retarded they have found 28 cures or treatment for AIDS in primates none of them work in humans. And 70 cures and treatments for diabetes in primates and other nonhuman animals none of them worked on humans. Do you know why that is? Because cats and monkeys are not humans. And this is information on Northwestern universities web site.
killyoubitch27 1 year ago
OK ninja ghost. falcon punch
killyoubitch27 1 year ago
yo PSVIDZ08 i just want to t=say tht ur vid i completely agree with but i jst want to noe if u r a scientist or something related to the medical industries
triniprince438 1 year ago
I think that if PETA and all the whiny little bitches out there who agree with them want us to stop testing on animals then they should offer up themselves as test subjects
jparish62 1 year ago
Thank you for making this video!
sincityfire 1 year ago
Don't donate to PETA, they fuckin suck. A bunch of hypocrites. If you care about animals and don't want your money to just get pocketed, donate to other animal protection services like the ASPCA or the Humane Society.
66SiK 1 year ago 25
@66SiK both of those organization also put to sleep animals. Which I agree with..
fireout700 7 months ago
@fireout700 I love you :D Thank you for being awesome.
fireout700 7 months ago
@66SiK who also put to sleep animals
fireout700 7 months ago
PETA are annoying
xJudgementalist 1 year ago
shut the fuck up about aids. no one gives a shit. dont fuck a whore and you wont get it. simple as that.
ElloMyNameIsWalton 1 year ago
@ElloMyNameIsWalton wow really...so you don't care about people dieing...your cold....
theguitarhero3 1 year ago
Join People Eat Tasty Animals 2day!(I'm going 2 get lotsa hate mail but I enjoy Peta's suffering) When U join Peta u get paid 1 cent 4 every animal u kill! U get 10 cents for blowing up a bank! & We'll pay U 1 dollar 4 ripping of of good video games & 1.0 dollars 4 being nude in our next terrorist act!(Peta = they worship Hitler)
YTPrule 1 year ago 2
did your daddy play with youe peepee? is that y you like torture animals Your sadistic mother fuckers.
killyoubitch27 1 year ago
@killyoubitch27 No, did yours? Is that why you feel you need to take out your unwanted aggressions on an innocent person eating a fucking cheeseburger? Get over yourself, and know someone before you judge them.
NinjaGhostScorpion 1 year ago
@NinjaGhostScorpion I wouldn't try to sway his opinion.... There is no reasoning with these fuckers....
Meatfortoeat 1 year ago
@killyoubitch27 WE DON'T!!! Did you know that Peta insults overweight people with the "Save the whales" billboard? You'll probably come up with some excuse. There is no reasoning with you whiners who can't accept how the world works. None of this makes sense to you though, does it?
Meatfortoeat 1 year ago
@Meatfortoeat I eat cheeseburgers and steaks the stuff that makes me mad is dogs and monkeys cats you name it being tortured in a lab so companies can test solvents or detergents and other stupid shit and then there killed and cut open to see what kind of damage it did to their internal organs that's the shit that makes me fuckin mad.
killyoubitch27 1 year ago
@killyoubitch27 It isn't always items like detergents, Often times it is to cure deadly and painful diseases such as AIDS and cancer.
Meatfortoeat 1 year ago
@Meatfortoeat We'll check out Huntington life science 95% percent of the animals there are tested on for industrial chemicals and products. They're not curing AIDS or cancer over there.
killyoubitch27 1 year ago
@killyoubitch27 No animal experiements are curing aids or cancer (or anything else)...Dr. Richard Klausner, as director of the US National Cancer Institute, plainly states:
"The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse... We have cured mice of cancer for decades - and it simply didn't work in humans."
sciencenotrats 1 year ago
@killyoubitch27 I don't see the difference between being against factory farming vs animal testing. They are both happening for the same reasons. They are both inflicting "Unnecessary cruelty" towards sentient, feeling, and, if you ever get the extraordinary chance to meet any, surprisingly cute and sweet beings. To eat meat and detest lab testing is nothing short of downright hypocritical.
unazaine 1 year ago
@Meatfortoeat Hey, Meat For.... To Eat, how does the world work? I'm curious, please show me exactly how it does, and expose how little vegans understand, and how immoral and insane it is to want to help in any way possible. Fat people know they are fat. Am I supposed to tip toe around fat people now? Wow. You called a fat person... fat! Crazy.
unazaine 1 year ago 3
might I introduce bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) and isolated chicken eye (ICE). two alternatives to live animal testing for ocular safety testing. In September of 09 the CVI developed a new NDV vaccine...an alternative to live poultry testing. the 3r's wasn't developed for shits and giggles. do your research kids...before you rant out of your ass about how necessary animal testing is
italysgirl1 1 year ago
@italysgirl1 alternatives made after researching from live animals. good job. animal research is still needed
pwelive 1 year ago
One day our technology will be obsolete enough and we'll have to look back at all the animals we killed and just say ''oh well'' if the whole 2012 thing were to happen I'd say we damn well deserve every bit of suffering after reading all this pro animal testing shit that sounds just as smug as the PETA propoganda
italysgirl1 1 year ago