Added: 3 years ago
From: haudlroz
Views: 32,213
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • what a boring commentator

  • and now...... shhiiiittttttttt!!!!

  • king4barcelona, I think you say that brazil samba will be killed by tiki-taka football

  • brazil squad was most overated squad many new star show many samba skill than 2006 2010

  • This brazalian team got handled by France in 06 quater final :)

  • @Yunghamz yea by a one man team u could say

  • @tricolor707 Oh yes, France was basically Zidane in that world cup right, let's just forget about Makelele, Ribery, Malouda, Sagnol , Abidal, Henry, Thuram etc...What a very educated comment you just made there.

  • @Yunghamz Well my statement was more of a correction to your original statement you posted earlier. I just thought it was helpful to refresh your memory a bit since it is common knowledge. Look back at France back in 2010 with the players you mentioned... Look how far they progressed.

  • @tricolor707 I don't need you to refresh my memory of a team i support. First of all, you seem to dismiss my reply by mentioning the 2010 world cup campaign? Zidane was the best player in the team but the team he played in also consisted of good players. There were 4 french players in the 2006 world cup XI, What you said in you're original comment is comparable to " Messi is Barca".

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @Yunghamz Who's comparing Messi here? Messi is a striker for Barca. Zidane played as a midfielder for most of his career. Zidane has won the World Cup while Messi has yet to win it. One is still active in his career while the other is retired from football. BIIIIIIGGGGG DIFFFERRRREEENNCEE.

    anyways no argument here. Just referencing how Brazil lost to France in 2006. Some teams have their moments man. A team that wins has to lose at some point down the line.

  • @tricolor707 I'm not sure that you read my whole replys properly. The reason i mentioned Messi is because you called the French team that faced Brazil in 2006 a one man team and i am comparing you're statement to other uneducated statements like "Barca are a one man team because of Messi". You have not once answered my replys, tell me why Brazil failed to score? Surely if France was a one man team, they would have conceded and have Zidane score all the goals.

  • @tricolor707 Zidane was the captain, France obviously need him just like any other team need their captain. However they did not need him to the extent of being reduced to a "One man team". The difference with Zidane was that he was a very good player and showed up in big games which inspires the rest of the team, this is what captains do and should do. Brazil did not show up in that match, this is why they lost. It is very simple to understand this.

  • @tricolor707 Secondly. most of the players i mentioned in my reply did not play in the 2010 world cup. Abidal is the crucial factor here, since when was he a center back? Yet Domenech kept playing him there. That french team was not as organised as the 2006 team. I thought THIS was common knowledge. This whole argument is based on France beating Brazil in the quarter final and i am sorry but i don't seem to remember Brazil scoring a goal. Was Zidane playing in defence?

  • @Yunghamz the reason some of those players didn't participate in the 2010 World Cup was because they were too old. The French team wasn't as organized as the 2006 team because they weren't suppose to be in the 2010 World Cup in the first place. Mr Sarcastic Joe let me ask you this: who influenced the game against Brazil? What was the crucial factor why Brazil failed to score? Did Henry all of a sudden grew wings and flew to the opposing goal and scored the ball into the net with his hands?

  • @tricolor707 First of all im going to apologise for not seeing this reply, it sems you have replied to my prevoise comment and ignore my comment about you not doing this. Secondly, there is no need for insults, it just weakens you're point. Look at my other comment to see why Zidane influenced that game. We are talking about the 2006 team not being a one man team, i already mentioned those players didn't play, no need to repeat what i said.

  • @Yunghamz What are you saying? I'm giving you straight answers here. Were you really serious asking me why Zidane was playing in the defense? I took most of what you said as a joke.I wasn't trying to insult you. We're not in a political science class to argue over a match that occurred 5 years ago. What i saw in France was a team lead by one man while you saw a team effort. I'm ending my conversation here, I don't really see the need to continue this conversation any further. Have a Good day man

  • @tricolor707 Now you have slightly changed you're comment. "Lead by one man" = A captain leading a team e.g Zidane in this case. " One man team" which you have said = A team SOLELY dependant on one man. Don't retract you're comment to make it more suitable, stand by you're statements. The reason this debate matters is because I remember every French match from the start and don't look at some parts of the tournament to make ludicrous suggestions.

  • @Yunghamz no no no. i don't think you're getting the point here "lead by one man" or "one man team" is the same shit to me blood i'm not changing my statements. your the one that's changing your statements here blood. you mentioned that part of that tournament in the first place. Don't be pointing fingers. France didn't do shit in 2002 and 2010 without that nigga i don't see why you trippin

  • @tricolor707 France 2006, not France 2002, not France 2010, but France 2006 were not solely dependant on Zidane. Solely dependant means no other players are needed if you have one good player. This was not the case in 2006. France conceded 1 goal against the attacking Spain, 0 goals against Brazil and Portugal and 1 against Italy in the final. That is tight defending and Makelele and Vieira were also the reason for this. These players had the same contribution as Zidane, defensive wise.

  • @Yunghamz but then again it's not enough dude. the best concept of defending is having the ball in your possession, taking it up field and putting the ball at the back of your opponents net. This is what the Brazilian team did in this video. That's a team right there bro. That's when a team is not dependent on a single player

  • @tricolor707 Oh i did not see this second comment. Lol, what? Seriously? You think what Brazil is doing here in this video is defending? lol. So France's defensive display was not enough? Are you saying France would have progressed into the 2006 Final Without Vieira and Makelele, not forgetting Thuram's useful experience?

  • @Yunghamz i couldn't reply sooner man. i had that tsunami warning issued in my area.

    Anyways yea that's considered defending where I'm from no doubt about it lol. The defense was going to perform well regardless. The defense can only take so much before it begins to break down by the opposition. This is why i say the best method of defending is to attack. The defense is just there to take away the ball from the opposition's attack.

  • @tricolor707 ooo no problem dude, that tsunami is fucked up.

    It's nice to see we agree on something :). Well i support France and i remember France were on the upper hand during extra-time and i think France would have had a better chance of winning and if it did still went on to penalties, atleast Zidane would have taken one.

  • @Yunghamz this is a continuation to my second comment. i felt like i didn't address your question well enough. Yea i do believe that France would have progressed to the final without those players; their roles was just better suited for the team at the time.

  • @Yunghamz France didn't concede many goals, but they didn't produce many goals; however, the goals that they did produce during the game against Spain and onwards, Zidane was involved whether he scored them or not. You have to admit, the penalties he scored were a also a deciding factor because Portugal's and Italy's defenders were keeping France's attack on check..

  • @tricolor707 Yep, i agree with you on the attack, there's no doubt about this. Zidane was crucial for the French attack as he helped inexperienced( at the time) but also crucial players such as Malouda and Ribery to perform in big games. But this doesn't explain the "One man team" comment as you also agree with me on France's defensive display. Now you see why i had a problem with that comment. If you want to link that comment with France's attack, i will agree with you all day.

  • @Yunghamz yea that was the point i wanted you to see all along nahmean. that one man team comment i posted earlier was a little bit of ignorance from my part, but i was 15 years when that tournament was going on. Looking back at it now, and this is just an opinion, do you think France would've won the final had Zidane not been sent off?

  • Why are you asking me what was the crucial factor as to why Brazil failed to score? I asked you this before in my previous post, which you still haven't answered. There's a thing called defence that stops people from scoring. If you watched the match properly, the crucial factor that lead to Henry's goal was Roberto Carlos, he did not track his man and was not participating in the defence. Please make you're points relevant to why you think France was a "One man team".

  • @Yunghamz You know what, you and I probably saw two different matches within the same match because you're not getting my points either. The reason i say he was France was because his passes contributed to scoring plays. I never said anything about him scoring all the goals for his team in the tournament, that was your assumption of a one man team.

  • @tricolor707 You never said anything about him scoring all the goals. But you did say France was a "One man team". You haven't given a good reason to back up this statement of yours. What you have been discussing is the job of a captain, his passes contributed to important plays and goals because he is playing behind the striker, he is the playmaker, hence the reason for wearing the number 10. France 2006 was a combination of new players coming in, plenty of experience and a genius (Zidane).

  • @Yunghamz no blood that your statement right there. yea i did mention France as a one man team. you just described what a one man team is right there. You sure about that? i remember a a slight majority of the squad was from the 1998 tournament

  • Comment removed

  • Pep Guardiola saw this and showed it to his Barcelona team :D

  • brazil samba would kill pep and kill tiki taka if they have back real samba,

  • @king4barcelona its pretty much the same shit

  • @tono2131 tiki taka was not adopted from Brazil

  • @kc270352 Technically it was. Rinus Michels who managed the Dutch in the 70's wanted his team to somewhat emulate Brazil's vibrant possession football. Rinus Michels managed Barcelona, and got them to do the same. Johan Cruyff, who was obviously in Rinus Michels Dutch team of the 70's also managed Barcelona and perfected the playing style.

    So there's a Brazilian influence in tiki-taka.

  • Brazil, Argentina and Spain are no doubt the best at this style of play. I swear they each get, at the lowest, 60% of the possession in games.

  • look at that control! @ 0:40

  • Like Barca

  • @SunsetGTI No no, Barça plays like Brazil. Not the other way around. (:

  • @TheYeahIDo

    Yeah you right but Barca is good student)

  • @SunsetGTI Definitely.

  • @SunsetGTI no no no no no. Barça reminds you of Brazil

  • it seems they didnt want to score but keep on passing seeing their lead and adriano just ruined the fun for them or something

  • This is how its really done passing and a goal

    None of that spanish bull shit where you pass back and fourth but dont score ever

  • and they say that Brazil are no match for mighty argentina and god maradona

  • Was this the younger (better) brazil team prior to the WC in Germany? Wish I saw that passing in the tournament. :(

  • thats a good video for kids to watch, the way they are realy up and attacking around the opponents area, but if the best pass is to go back to the defense then thats better than trying to be clever and put a ball through that might not make it. So basicaly patients in possession

  • Many people think of Brazilian teams as great individual players but you need to play as a team and understand one another, and all Brazil teams can do that.

  • @WELLBRAN - Problem with most people is just watching where the ball moves and the moment the ball go into back of the net. The system of how players run/move and position themselve off the ball is a rocket science to some!

  • @WELLBRAN all teams in the world can do that

  • menudo BAÑO

  • nice video, 5/5. thx for upload

  • OLE!! OLEEEEEE!!!!!!!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more