The Christ Deception - Episode 1 - Part 3 of 3

[naturalangel7]

NewWorldDestroyer if you are so correct why aren't you on the street teaching and bringing the lost sheep back to themselves and the Most High? as from what I have heard you are just a ball of confusion....

[countalucard82]

This doesn't disprove Jesus at all...The two Lineages clearly state that they are Joseph's lineages. In Matthew he's at the end and in Luke he's in the beginning. He's only called the son of David and it's because of Joseph's lineage. Mary was the only parent who was truly related to Jesus. If your only problem with Jesus is he's portrayed as white in America...He wasn't. He hid in Egypt over 2011 years ago from Herod with Mary and Joseph as a baby. They had to be pretty dark to pull that off.

[TheIsraelite144]

CHRIST IS THE KING OVER ALL ISRAEL NOT JUST JUDAH ISAIAH 65 :9 THEE ELECT IS ISRAEL THIS IS WHY IN JOHN 1 : 49 NATHANAEL ANSWERED "KING OF ISRAEL.

[Talltrees84]

Genealogies would ultimately be meaningless if God himself was the father of Jesus. Paul in 1 Tim. 1:4 and Titus 3:3 states that Christians should not get involved about foolish disputes about genealogies and things that would gain no profit. Jewish theologians believe that stories of Jesus being the son of God is an echo of pagan myths of gods having children with mortal women and also a device to cover up an embarrassing pregnancy of Mary.

[FunNotNuts]

Any train of thought which divides people for whatever reason is evil; regardless if it is a religion or philosophy or whatever.  So none of these emphatic words applies if it divides people.

[TheExodus17]

Besides, if you look at the dates for some of the epistles of Sh'aul like Romans which was written around 55 AD, it is impossible for a man who did not exist at this time wrote them. Apologetics my brother...

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@TheExodus17 You can try to claim that Marcion somehow altered the scriptures but what you can't say is that there existed a NT before his compilation of writings.

This whole immaculate conception concept is based on the erroneous idea that Isaiah 7: 14 was somehow associated with Christ but if you actually read the whole chapter you can see that prophecy was fulfilled in the 8th chapter of Isaiah and the son was Isaiah's son. Cont. B.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@TheExodus17 B. The prophecy was for King Ahaz and him alone.....and was based on the fact that Judah had united with Syria in an attempt to attack Israel. YAH stated that this would never come to pass and sent Isaiah to King Ahaz to offer him a sign as proof. This prophecy was fulfilled in the 8th ch. of Isaiah. Matthew 1: 22-23, is a blatant attempt to twist old testament scriptures. If you don't agree, then explain how Jesus has anything to do with Judah uniting with Syria against King Ahaz.

[RODOFYAH]

@NewWorldDestroyer your spot on its ahaz and the original name was almah NOT virgin, try telling that to your people drunk on edomite lies and deception. YAH has said only a remanant will return and 2/3rd will die. two KINGS cannot share the same throne YAH is the ONLY KING isaiah 43:15 no stiff necked people who cant see deception will change this

[TheExodus17]

The error in this series is that Jesus did not come through the line of Solomon, who came through Jechonia. It NATHAN that Mary came through and thus not making her apart of the curse. Besides, this proves that Jesus was born of a virgin (immaculate conception). Marcion was a heritic around 2nd century along with others such as Valentinus (135-165AD), Basilides (117-138) who tried to alter the Messianic message. It's obvious that Paul's Epistles existed at the time for Marcion to pick apart.

[PotJericho]

DEUTERONOMY 24 VERSE 16 THE FATHER SHALL NOT DIE FOR THE CHILDREN NEITHER SHALL CHILDREN FOR THE FATHERS BUT EVERY MAN SHALL DIE FOR HIS OWN SINS. AND THESE CLOWNS HAVE THE NERVE TO CALL SOMEONE A PHARISEE LOL LAMES.

[doublej1963]

My brother,my brother,let me defend my Father's word.That chapter 22 of Jer.did come true,but not on your time table,on THE MOST HIGH'S .Thats why we went into slavery.After 70 it happened.

[Oweboy1960]

The Hebrew numerical number for "Jesus" is 666.

[SRoDMo55]

Shalom my brother keep it up with the Good videos people tht dnt wnt to believe let them not.... there eyes been shut for a very long time... keep doin wat u doin my brother...YAH is goin to take care of the ones tht NO THE TRUTH...

[DaNYwatcher]

THANK YOU BROTHER, PRAISE YAH FOR THE KNOWLEDGE..... BEAUTIFUL..

[099749]

Not sure what to say really, both Matt and Luke, speak of the line of Joseph, yet we know Jesus isn't Joseph' son literally, just legally as Joseph is his adopted father.

We know nothing about Marys line at all really, if Jesus is a literal decendent of David that would have come from Mary, yet we know little if anything about it. Of the talk about Mary some say she was a Virgin in the temple, others say she was herself born to Ana as a virgin birth, but the gospels do not deal with it.

[holyvessel34]

ANYONE THAT DO NOT BELIEVE IN CHRIST IS SUBJECT TO HELL FIRE. You must sacrifice a lamb for your sins then too huh?? lol. You Israelites that do not believe in Christ remind me of the scribes and Pharisees. I hope you got a lot of lambs. Shalom.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 Scribes and Pharisees huh? Well I guess your Jesus wanted you to follow what I'm saying....

Matthew 23 :2-3 1Then spoke Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, 2 Saying The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: 3 All therefore whatever they bid you observe, that observe and do.....

Secondly, you can NOT show me one place in the NT where anyone ever called Christ "Emmanuel"....  Cont B.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 And like most, rather than attack my video or even my previous post, you just want to change the subject and regurgitate some more scriptures that someone taught you to believe was Christ LMAO! You just want to argue with me......did you even read Ch 7 and 8 of Isaiah? Was I wrong? Was I wrong about Jeconiah being cursed or that Christ descended from this cursed lineage? Quit jumping around and changing subjects and answer my questions and I would be happy to address yours.

[TheIsraelite144]

@NewWorldDestroyer QUICK QUESTION BRO WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR; TAKE THE KINGDOM. SEEMS EASY RIGHT OUR PEOPLE NEED A LEADER, A KING, THIS IS WHY WE WILL NOT ESCAPE THIS CAPTIVITY WE NEED THE MOSTHIGH TO GIVE THE GO AHEAD BY THE SENDING OF THE "GOD KING" FOR RIGHTOUS JUDGEMENTS. TILL THAN ALL WE GONNA DO IS JUST TALK SHALOM!!!!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 Oh yea, and NO......you don't have to sacrifice a lamb......

Ezekiel 18

21 But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die. 22All his transgressions that he hath committed, they shall not be mentioned unto him.......

So there you have it.......you NEVER needed Christ for ANYTHING. Google "Isu Chrestos" and see how your Christ came into being.

[holyvessel34]

ZEC 12 VERSE 10. 10And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.

[holyvessel34]

I never said his was jesus. His name in the old test is emmanuel( God with us) what di they say his name would be in matt 1. Emmanuel(Immanuel in the old test).

Sense you say it been fullfilled, then who in the heck is the scripture in zechariah 12 verse 10 talking about?? lol@that. sense christ is a fake. READ THIS "BRUH" BRUH

[holyvessel34]

Your following Satan. Isaiah 53 talks about Christ. Deuteronomy 18:15,18 talks about Christ. Isaiah 8:8 talks about Christ. Zechariah 12:10 speaks about Christ(The Most High being Christ. Then in first Timothy 3:16 speaks about God coming down in human form). Isaiah 7:14 talks about Christ. Im done!!! Ask the Holy Spirit to lead you and guide you. There are more scriptures, but yall get the point. Shalom.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 LOL! None of the scriptures you brought have anything to do with Christ nor do they disprove ANYTHING that I said in this video. Please show me where I errored......was Christ a descendant of Jeconiah? YES. Was Jeconiah's seed cursed and banned from ruling again? YES. I didn't write the bible bruh bruh, your beef is not with me. Beyond that, I will address Isaiah 7: 14 just as an example to show you how you have been mislead. Ok, start reading ch. 7 from the beginning. Cont B.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 B. And after you start at the beginning you "should" begin to see that this has NOTHING to do with Christ at all. The King of Syria and the King of Israel had joined forces in an attempt to attack Judah (Isaiah 7: 1). So YAH sent Isaiah to speak to King Ahaz (Judah) to let him know that this war would never come to pass. Now, verse 8 and 9 are important......"for the head of Syria is Damascus"....."and the head of Ephraim is Samaria".......remember this. Cont. C

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 C. So we get to verse 10.....now Isaiah wants King Ahaz to ask for a sign as proof from YAH that Israel (Ephraim) and Syria's plans of attack will not take place. So Isaiah prophesied the birth of a child AND that before the child is old enough to know the difference between good and evil, that the Kings of Israel and Syria would be destroyed. Well guess what? This prophecy is fulfilled in the 8th chapter. Cont. D.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@holyvessel34 D. Now, remember verse 8 and 9 in chapter 7......"for the head of Syria is Damascus"....."and the head of Ephraim is Samaria". Check this out,

Isaiah 8: 4

"For before the child shall have knowledge to cry, My father, and my mother, the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria shall be taken away before the king of Assyria."

Read ch. 8....prophecy fulfilled.....and this prophecy was 700 years before Christ about a specific problem that had NOTHING to do with your Jesus.

[bowtomonkey]

This argument can backfire on you.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@bowtomonkey Make it backfire.......point out my errors.

[bowtomonkey]

@NewWorldDestroyer There are far more lax Christians then active ones. Christians zealots are not respected. Most people accept the God of Christ but don't regard the bible as being fworthwhile.

You use the old testament to dissolve the only thing people are willing to accept. The stories sound like revisionist bragging from superstitious primitives.

Everyone knows about Jesus but few understand the spiritual message. They won't accept the old testament but may discover what Jesus' message is.

[skatahman]

I set here and watched all 3 of your video's just to listen to you misinterped the scriputures. Just because you found a little bit of knowledge that you interpeted wrong that don't mean you try to turn it into truth. you have some balls kid. Where in the new testament that Jesus said that he came to rule or that he came to sit on David's throne. I tell you, NO WHERE! the only referance near what you are saying is when they asked the LORD are you the King of the Jews and he said" yes I am"

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@skatahman Look bruh the scriptures are pretty clear....

Luke 1: 31-33

31And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb......, and shalt call his name JESUS. 32He shall be great.....and the Lord God shall give unto him the THRONE OF HIS FATHER DAVID:

Now, is this statement above true or false? Your debate is not with me its with your bible.......

[skatahman]

@NewWorldDestroyer I have debated the word and the word comes back unscaved. It is U that need to redebate the word.

The stament that U are making is false and misinterped and it bares the fruit of the antichrist. If U think about your stament you will have to retract the the whole old tastement 2 because the old prophets talked of his coming.

There is a answere to what you are saying and i am going to find it i will not just put any false statment on here 2 make you wrong. but i will study

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@skatahman Ok, well I'm looking forward to your response.......but I will tell you that you will not find one. NONE of Jeconiah's seed will ever sit on David's throne again (including your Jesus) and the only way you can make these verses rectify themselves is if you write a new book.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@YahSedQanu Zerubabel was never a King nor did he ever sit upon Davids throne. At that time, Judah was persian province ruled by Cyrus. Zerubabel was a puppet governer under persian rule. Read Ezra ch 4 and 5. Zerubabel even had to get permission from Cyrus to rebuild the temple.

[YahSedQanu]

Yeah, again: OH SNAP because ahk, if Yichonyah's line is cut off which I believe since Ahayah's verdict it was, then how is it that Zerubabel get's the crown to lead Yasharahla out of Babylon as their king????????????????? OR am I now confused???

[YahSedQanu]

OH SNAP!

[wordword31]

I would add that IF YOU WERE RIGHT, it only strengthens MY faith because Christ was the curse for all of us. Wow! In any event, I suggest you do more thorough research b4 you come out against one of God's most precious prophets. Only the devil would blind you to love ALL other prophets in the old testiment and hate Jesus Christ. Watch: "Jeconiah and the Virgin Birth of Christ" done 3 whole years b4 u screwed this up. REPENT, REPENT, REPENT!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

"U conviently give credit to the Israelites for using Luke 3:27 as the lineage for Mary..."

Thats odd....cuz so does the video you suggested I watch. It also claims that Luke is Mary's geanealogy so why you would reference that is MIND BOGGLING. Beyond that, the video proved nothing and I actually suggest that anyone who reads this watch it so they can also see that it proves nothing. Both geanealogies list Joseph as the father......I only said Mary to give people the benefit of the doubt.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@wordword31 So, in my own personal opinion the geanealogies both belong to Joseph and are a big ass contradiction.......one of many in the New Testament. For example, was Jesus crucified before or after the passover? What were Christ last words on the Cross? Was Mary alone, with another person, or with several people when she went to Jesus tomb? Please answer these question at least for benefit of people that may come to this page.

[wordword31]

I would add that IF YOU WERE RIGHT, it only strengthens MY faith because Christ was the curse for all of us. Wow! In any event, I suggest you do more thorough research b4 you come out against one of God's most precious prophets. Only the devil would blind you to love ALL other prophets in the old testiment and hate Jesus Christ. Watch: "Jeconiah and the Virgin Birth of Christ"

[LeviticalSword]

@wordword31 Let the divine messengers record and report to the Most High that I spit on everything Jesus/Yeshua/Yahoshua or whatever name you want to call him represents.

[wordword31]

Ok, let me start by debunking your ludacris theory that all Zerubbabels in the scriptures are the same person. There's a Zerubbabel who is born of the Jeconiah whom God cursed laid out in 1 Ch 3:15-19. And there's a Zerubbabel born Shealtiel who is not in 1 Ch anywhere. This Zerubbabel was a governor in Judah from the House of David. David had many sons, not just Jeconiah; so someone from the house of Judah may rule EXCEPT Jeconiah's seed.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@wordword31 Lol, you have been EXPOSED!!! Hahahaha!

"There's a Zerubbabel who is born of the Jeconiah whom God cursed laid out in 1 Ch 3:15-19. And there's a Zerubbabel born Shealtiel who is not in 1 Ch anywhere."

Shealtiel is nothing more than the greek version of Salathiel....its the same person, look it up. So right off the bat, you have shown what little you know........I LOVE IT!!!!!! I don't even know why you brought Zerubbabel up.....he NEVER sat on Davids throne so whats ya point?

[wordword31]

I must admit your premise was troubling, because what if you were correct. I was disturbed by that, but you are just a parakeet like the rest. No where in the Scriptures is Mary the mother of Jesus and the rest layed out. U conviently give credit to the Israelites for using Luke 3:27 as the lineage for Mary because it suited your argument perfectly. If this was presented from ur own research, then you have failed, but I even doubt that. I'm sure someone showed you this golden calf.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 Lol, who said anything about Jehoiakim??? And as you just posted, the scripture says that the curse was upon Jeconiah AND HIS SEED.

"for NO MAN of HIS SEED SHALL PROSPER, sitting upon the throne of David, & ruling any more in Judah."

There are no commas in hebrew so the "prosper" used here is in conjunction with "sitting upon the throne of David".......what your attempting to do is put a period in the middle of a sentence where it doesn't belong.

[morningsun29]

This debate with me is over, I gave you the scriptures. Jechonias's seed ...

Zerubabel prospered. There is no sign that the curse was stuck. Jechonias repented as Jer. 22:1-4 says, that YHWH will have mercy if he repented, His son's name proves he repented as does his children prospering.

End point. I am done

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 And again, the prophecy does NOT state that no man from Jeconiahs seed will prosper.......it says that none of his seed will prosper sitting upon the throne of David. Stop trying to twist this.......if Jeconiah had repented than he would have been King longer than 3 months and he would not have never been an old man in CAPTIVITY getting a welfare check (ration of food)......so again, Jer 22: 3-4 DID NOT HAPPEN, instead Jeconiah chose verse 5 and the Davidic Kingship ended. FACT!!!!

[morningsun29]

The curse of Jechoniah was lifted anyways.If all you got is genealogy, as you stated. They could have messed with that also. Luke & Matt. is a genealogy of David's line. Whether you believe virgin birth or Joseph,the David line is there either way. You never denied Luke's genealogy.I see you stood clear away from it.

Jeconiah repented & YHWH said he wouldn't take away MERCY FROM DAVID, as he did with Saul, Jeconiah had 4 children, he wasn't childless 1 chron. 3:17-18, also read Zech. 4:7,9-10

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 "The curse of Jechoniah was lifted anyways"

Uh, can you show us one scripture where YAH stated that he had removed this curse from Jeconiah AND his seed. And obviously, childless did not mean he didnt have children.....the curse stated that none of his seed would ever rule again in Israel (Judah). That was the curse.

[morningsun29]

@NewWorldDestroyer Sure no problem,

CURSE: Jer.22:18,30 1st)Childless 2nd) not prosper in his days 3rd) no throne of David & ruling in Judah. BUT THIS IS ONLY IF HE DIDN'T REPENT (Jer.22:1-4) If he repents, there is no curse.

1 Chronicles 3:17-18 He has children, Jechonias prospers in Babylon 2 Kg 25:27-30, & His son Zerubabel (Hag. 2:4,21-23 & Zech. 4:6-10)

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 Ok again, we know that Jeconiah had children cuz Jeremiah 22: 30 says his "seed" so you don't have a point there. Next you brought up Jer 22: 1-4, neglecting to acknowledge that the 5th verse is what actually took place and verses 3-4 NEVER happened......the throne was lost and there hasn't been a Davidic King in Judah since Jeconiah so even history proves that you are wrong.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 Jeconiah did not "prosper" in Babylon, that is ridiculous!

2 Kings 25: 27-28

27.....king of Babylon....28....spake kindly to him, and set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him in Babylon;

With him in Babylon doing what? Ruling? Hell no, all of these "kings", including Jeconiah were in CAPTIVITY. He was a slave and prisoner....only later he was released and given a daily allowance of bread to eat before the REAL King....you call that prospering? Cont B.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 B. Besides.....the curse isn't about just prospering, its about not prospering "sitting upon the throne of David".....and neither Jeconiah, Zerubabel or any of his descendants EVER sat upon the throne of David again. The proof is in the pudding, it never happened again. Yes, YAH was very fond of Zerubabel.....nonetheless, Zerubabel NEVER sat on Davids throne......NEVER!!!!

[morningsun29]

@NewWorldDestroyer Haggai 2:23 In that day, saith the LORD of hosts, will I take thee, O Zerubbabel, my servant, the son of Shealtiel, saith the LORD, and WILL MAKE THEE AS A SIGNET: FOR I HAVE CHOSEN THEE, saith the LORD of hosts.

Zech. 4:7 Who art thou, O great mountain? before Zerubbabel thou shalt become a plain: and he shall bring forth the headstone thereof with shoutings, crying, Grace, grace unto it.

THE SEED of Jechonias was Chosen by YHWH to prosper = CURSE LIFTED!

[morningsun29]

@NewWorldDestroyer Jechonias's TWO SON'S NAME, while he was in Babylon, was Salathiel = "I have asked of God" & Assir= "prisoner". Jechonias repents while in Prison, his son's names are a witness. YHWH said, he would have mercy on David & his seed if they sinned, especially if they repented. Jer. 22:1-4

[thenakedangler]

pharisee,s!!!!!!!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@thenakedangler Its really easy to attack the messenger but can you attack the message, hmmm? What did I present in this video that was in error? Do tell.....

[morningsun29]

Looks like you copied the information in my video "Was Joseph the Father of Yahushua". I believe he is of the Seed of David, but I don't believe Joseph was his father. There are two genealogies in the New Testament.  One is Joseph's & one is Yahushua's.

You want to claim, Matt.1 as Yahushua's geneology, but it is not.It clearly says it is Joseph's. Yahushua's geneology is in Luke & Mary was a Virgin. YHWH can make this Miracle happen. Luke is Mary's Father's genealogy! of the seed of David.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 First off, copied from you??? I don't know you nor have I ever seen ANY of your vids. Secondly, where in Luke ch3 do see any mention of Mary.......just show us 1 place? Luke 3 says Joseph is his father so cut da shit! That chapter only mentions "sons"......so how you can squeeze a woman into a list that EXCLUDES women is pretty funny actually. You might as well write your own bible.

[morningsun29]

@NewWorldDestroyer Ya right, you didn't copy. I don't mind. Not everyone is creative with there own ideas. I don't care really, any how, anyone can check out my video & see how you list the genealogy that you indeed copied. But its cool :)

Lol, Mary isn't there.Joseph was Mary's husband.It wasn't a gay union.If Matthew is Joseph's genealogy, it doesn't take a ROCKET SCIENCIST, to see that Luke must be Mary's genealogy through her father because she isn't mentioned.If not, than who's is it?

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@morningsun29 ".If not, than who's is it?"

Uh its a lie like many many things in the New Testament. For example,

Luke 9: 27

But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God.

Do you also believe that these people Christ spoke to are still living and never died? Come on now....

[sftyou]

The so-called NT is indeed in a checkmate. The debarring of the seed of Coniah (Jer 22:30) debars Christ under the Matt 1 genealogy. And there are many other checkmates besides, some of which have been addressed in the discussion. However, I must take issue in respect of the Luke 3 genealogy, which goes from Joseph back to David through Nathan, the brother of Solomon. Therefore, the Luke genealogy does not include Coniah, although some of the names in the two genealogies may be the same. (cont)

[sftyou]

(cont)

This nuance leaves the NT still very much in checkmate. For even if the genealogy of Luke is claimed to be that of a Righteous Branch (Jer 23:5) that is not debarred, the NT would still be left as an internal contradiction, as the two genealogies diverge at David, one descending from Solomon, the other from his brother Nathan. They cannot both be correct. (cont)

I

[sftyou]

(cont)

It is never a good idea to overstate one's case. The Truth is sufficient. You are right that there is a process of refinement involved (see Mal 3:2), and it is in that spirit that I offer this comment.

-- Malachi Yahya ben Yahmin

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@sftyou Brotha, just said a whole lot of nothing. I didn't overstate anything.......everything you just stated is based on the belief that Luke 3 is actually accurate, though you have NO bases for this concept. Show me your witnesses that are in agreement with Luke 3 and state that the genealogy given there is actually Nathans? I mean if its phony its phony, why debate that?

[sftyou]

@NewWorldDestroyer Calm down, I'm on your side. I'm trying to help refine the argument. I'm not arguing for the truth of the Luke genealogy vs the Matthew genealogy. I'm merely acknowledging the FACT that the two CLAIMS are different. I understood you to imply that both genealogies went through Coniah. Only the Matt genealogy branches out of Solomon (Matt 1:6), The Luke genealogy brances out of Nathan (see Luke 3:31). Therefore they do not both include Coniah. Small point, I know.

--Malachi

[omegaking1]

you asked for christ name in the ot and i gave it 2... you what you gone do block me so you can contine lyin to people... this aint about likin this bullshit vid.. its about truth which you care nutthin about... gettin all emotional like a bitch!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@omegaking1 Ha naw I don't block people fool and actually my opinion of the entire book has changed since I made this vid.......emotional? LMAO

[omegaking1]

why is this dumb ass vid still up didint i smash this already!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@omegaking1 Stay the fuck off my page you don't like it homie......smash? You never addressed shit so move on omega queen!!!!!!

[omegaking1]

AMOS 9:11i will restore the tent of DAVID!! STOP WITH THE BULL S#!T DUDE

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@omegaking1

So tell me, where in this video was I in error? Christ not a descendant of Jeconiah? Did YAH not say that Jeconiah and his seed would never rule again? Point out my error brotha....

Amos 9: 11

"In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old:"

What ruins did Christ rule over homie? NONE!!! This is talking about DAVID not christ.

[omegaking1]

@NewWorldDestroyer jre 23:5 propheied about christ stop the madness man this is in the next chapter

[NewWorldDestroyer]

And again I ask YOU to refer back the Jeremiah 22......

Verse 30

"......for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah."

Was YAH lying? Was he? I mean its very simple......you keep telling me to stop the madness but you fail to realize that what you are claiming is madness. Christ is "suppose" to have been here since the beginning so show me 1 place where is NAME is mentioned in the OT.....you can't just pick shit and say its him.

[Javierjahve]

@NewWorldDestroyer Daniel 9 20:27

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Shit, even Satan had a name, the angels had names, so show me christ name? Your christ and that NT are false books full of false prophecies......

Luke 9: 27

"But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God."

Its 2,000 years later and you still trying to make a square block fit a circular hole......that generation is long gone and where is the kingdom this idol promised? And don't try to claim that they never died.

[omegaking1]

@NewWorldDestroyer HIS NAME IS IN JER 23:6 A KING FROM DAVID HIS NAME WILL BE LORD AND SAVIOR YAHSUWA=YAH-SAVES AKA JESUS MAT1:21 AND YOU SHALL CALL HIS NAME JESUS HE WILL (SAVE) HIS PEOPLE FROM THERE SINS STOP THIS WICKEDNESS FAM

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@ofreshartist2 - Lol.....I like you because your relentless......but still wrong. The Zedekiah that ruled was the brother of Jehoiakim (1Chron. 3: 15), not Jehoiakim's son named Zedekiah (1Chron. 3: 16). But even if it was, it still has no bearing on Jeconiah and his seed......none whatsoever. The curse was put on Jeconiah NOT Zedekiah.

[sinhielo]

He did prosper in his day.

In the thirty-seventh year of the exile of Jehoiachin king of Judah, in the year Evil-Merodach became king of Babylon, he released Jehoiachin from prison on the twenty-seventh day of the twelfth month. He spoke kindly to him and gave him a seat of honour higher than those of the other kings who were with him in Babylon. - 2 Kings 25:27-28

[NewWorldDestroyer]

What you said has no bearing on anything.....1st, "Record this man childless" obviously doesn't mean that he didn't have children....

"gave him a seat of honour higher than those of the other kings who were with him in Babylon."

Uh yea, of the other kings who were in CAPTIVITY with him. He spent decades in prison and got out was treated kindly, but that has nothing to do with him sitting on the throne of David.......that day was over just as the prophecy stated.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Beyond that, the prophecy also states,

Jeremiah 22: 30

"......for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah."

It means what it says......and the proof is in the pudding......Did anyone of Jeconiah's seed rule in Judah after him? NO! His lineage was the only lineage ruling in Judah, and after this was spoken, Judah NEVER had another King......so its obvious what the prophecy was.

[sinhielo]

Though the Hebrew literally reads, "Record this man childless," Jeconiah in fact had children.

The descendants of Jehoiachin the captive: Shealtiel his son, Malkiram, Pedaiah, Shenazzar, Jekamiah, Hoshama and Nedabiah - 1 Chronicles 3:17-18

[sinhielo]

Truly Jeremiah 22:24-30 details the curse of Jeconiah, specifically that he should be childless. However, in 1st Chronicles we that Jeconiah indeed had children and a lineage as follows:

The descendants of Jehoiachin the captive: Shealtiel his son, Malkiram, Pedaiah, Shenazzar, Jekamiah, Hoshama and Nedabiah - 1 Chronicles 3:17-18

[WeAllHavePain1]

Wow Brotha these series that U have Brought out are very Interesting Indeed I checked out all 3 of these and I had my Bible out also going along w/u like U asked anyways Im Learning alot but I have to commend U for standing on ur own well I should say haven Most High on your side I like Truth708 I agree w/alot he says but Its so much Info My not use to hearing from my Hebrew Brothas maybe alot of us Have easily been deceived/misled I dont Quest ppl but maybe we should Test the Spirits

[NewWorldDestroyer]

I appreciate it sister!!!! And I agree, we must test the spirits......it is my opinion that, without debate, there is NO progress. Shalom

[WeAllHavePain1]

Your right Im not a debater ILL leave that w/the Brothas but I Overtsand what U mean we have to progress Im tired of going backwards in my life coming to a deadEnd so to speak not knowing nothing Your own ppl not wanting to Teach U they pick&use we dont know How talk to one another we dont have be Hard all time all day long were not gentle towards ea.other Brothas make alot Sistaz feel Low Its bad enough tryn make It Tryn get our Stuff In Order Brotha Ive got Story tell Bless U for understandn

[nathanyel7]

You are truly unlearned regarding scripture. Your arguements regarding Jeconiah is laughable. But I'll leave you with this JOHN 5:45: Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust.

46: For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me.

47: But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Yea but I noticed you presented no argument though......quoting John 5: 45 will get you chopped up over here my brotha.......when did Moses ever even mention "christ"? In fact, when did anyone in the OT mention him, what was his name in the OT? Even Satan had a name. So if you tryin to push that Deut. 18: 15 as if thats "christ", the only unlearned brotha here is you, cuz when did prophets become Saviors/ Human Sacrifices/ God......Debate or bounce cuz yall already been served on my Dan video.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

And even if you wanted to claim thats "christ" in Deut. 18: 15......it makes no sense. According to the New Testament "christ" is the word to begin with, so why would YAH have to put any words in "christ" mouth, shit, he's suppose to be the word remember??? Anyway, Im still waiting for you boyz to man up......my 144,000 LIES video got yall looking bad out here so why don't we debate that topic. And unlike your comrads, Im not gonna block you and remove your comments.....you can speak freely.

[nathanyel7]

1 corinthians 14:38": But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

Bro. the scriptures also teach us

Proverbs 1:22": How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?"

LOL I will leave u alone bro. Peace

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Nathanyel, you gotta come better than that bruh. Correct me brotha......naw, don't leave alone, its time to stand up for the doctrine, if what you have is truth then witness for the Most High. I thought you watched this video? Its witness time my dear beloved brotha, why you runnin!?!?!

Proverbs 28: 1

The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.

[NeedtheTruth89]

Woeeee!! Brother help me out, can you explain to me why and who Haggai 2:23 is referring to? How did that happen in that verse? Due to the fact that Jer 22:28 used the word "seed" (meaning one) and not seeds. I just need to know for real!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Yes sir, what do you need help with? Haggai 2: 23 is talking about Zerubbabel son Sheatiel (Salathiel).....didn't connect the two in this vid because it would have led to confusion with the different names and all.....but if your point is that it says Zerubbabel was the govener, then you have no point at all. All of that took place under the Persian rule of Judah and Zerubbabel never sat on David's throne nor did David ever rule under conquest of an oppressor......Not even comparable.

[NeedtheTruth89]

So correct me if I'm wrong or may I say can you make it clear to me. Do you believe when scripture says that a Messiah will come? Or do you believe that there is no Messiah (Physically/flesh) but that The Most High will be the one to come for Israel?

[NewWorldDestroyer]

No, I absolutely believe in the concept of a "Messiah".......but a "Messiah" is not a Savior......only YAH can save. Check this out,

Amos 9: 11

"In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up HIS ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old:"

This is not "christ" brotha......what ruins did christ rule over, none. The New Testament has twisted scripture.

[NeedtheTruth89]

So all the scripture that explains a physical Messiah such as Jeremiah 23:5-6, Zech 6:12 are all incorrect is this what you're saying? I'm just trying to get information, I'm not trying to set you up or anything. lol!

[NewWorldDestroyer]

No.......but "messiah" only means anoited and Israel had many "messiahs" through out time....but no David will return as King not "christ". Let me give an example of twisted scripture.

Matthew 2: 15 qoutes Hosea 11: 1, which has nothing to do with a messiah.

Matthew 2: 17-18 quotes Jeremiah 31:15, but read verse 16-17 in Jeremiah, it has nothing to do with christ.

Matthew 1: 22-23 quotes Isaiah 7: 14, but this is a sign for King Ahaz. Read Isaiah ch 7 and 8, prophecy fulfilled in the ch 8.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Matthew 16: 28

Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

You see "christ" and the people who believed in him thought they we at the end.....total FALSE prophecy.

John 14: 13-14

13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

Bruh, you can find false shit like this all over the NT.

[NeedtheTruth89]

Ok that's all I needed to know. Thanks for those scriptures.

Shalom

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Kool, good luck on your quest for truth.

Shalom

[NeedtheTruth89]

Not saying that I agree with you totally on this, but thanks for the information that you supplied as well as your encouraging comment. You do the same NWD!

Peace and be blessed

[omegaking1]

@NewWorldDestroyer he was talking about johns revelation he saw the son of man and his kingdom

[NewWorldDestroyer]

I respectfully disagree......

"......I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old."

Brotha, it says raise up his ruins......again, what ruins did christ have? What was ever built that had christ name on it? I agree that this is a future prophecy.....what you don't get is that, 1) Christ cant rule over anything because he descends from Jeconiah, and 2) that Amos 9 has nothing to do with christ but rather is speaking of David, it is his ruins that will be raised up.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

As far as John and his phony revelation......check out my 144,000 LIES video and see if you can explain why the tribe of Dan has been left out of the count of the 144,000 in Rev. 7? If what you have is truth, I will be waiting for you response my brotha.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

"used the word "seed" (meaning one) and not seeds" Here are some other examples of "seed" in Jeremiah. Jeremiah 23: 8 30: 10 31: 36-37 33: 22 33: 26 46: 27 49: 10 Not once will you see anything about "seeds"....with an S on the end.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

And also my brotha, I didn't wanna give the impression that YAH aint dealing with Jeconiah's seed in this video, thats why I said at 3:54 that it doesn't mean they are not Israel anymore......YAH called Zerubbabel his servant and was very fond of him......"in that day" YAH will bring Zerubbabel back but NOT as the "King".

Daniel 12: 2

"And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt."

[yahblessus]

lol ahk Dekoiyah, is the breakdown of Isaiah 53 even necessary after this? Either way still bring it. I was just coming in here to see if the crickets were still chirping and the tumbleweeds still rolling as I still have yet to hear anyone come against this revelation... Shalom!

[DEKOIYAH]

i want more. please do 53 isaiah

[NewWorldDestroyer]

Fa sho!!!!

[prophetkey]

Shalam: Family, the video is heavy, Tada for it and HaleluYAHWAH. From the Dan- Prpht.

[yahblessus]

I find it interesting that Luke quotes Peter as saying in Acts 5:30 "The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree." when thus saith Yah, Deuteronomy 21:23 "His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) that thy land be not defiled, which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance."

[NewWorldDestroyer]

True.......and even in my messianic days, I found it interesting that it said "tree" to begin with......

[whatigottado2]

All I say is...I cant say anything. im speechless akhi. wonderful wonderful wonderful!!! blessings brother

[wordword31]

Mary, son of Jesus lineage is not recorded in the Scriptures.

[koates657]

Christ descended from a curse line. Disqualifying him from ever being a king over Judah. Brother once again a perfect cut!

[wordword31]

@koates657 Ok, let me start by debunking your ludacris theory that all Zerubbabels in the scriptures are the same person. There's a Zerubbabel who is born of the Jeconiah whom God cursed laid out in 1 Ch 3:15-19. And there's a Zerubbabel born Shealtiel who is not in 1 Ch anywhere. This Zerubbabel was a governor in Judah from the House of David. David had many sons, not just Jeconiah; so someone from the house of Judah may rule EXCEPT Jeconiah's seed.

[koates657]

@wordword31 I don`t have to say a word because, " NewWorldDestroyer"  has cut you up again and again

[YahSedQanu]

@wordword31 Dummy! Sealthiel comes from the line of Yichonyah as does the father of Zerubabel, Pedayahu! read with care... you read while you are on some recreational substance called religious doctrine

[YahSedQanu]

@wordword31 @wordword31 Dummy! Sealthiel comes from the line of Yichonyah as does the father of Zerubabel, Pedayahu! read with care... you read while you are on some recreational substance called religious doctrine

[paramon001]

@YahSedQanu There is some $5000 to be made if you are interested. Not withstanding that it will put this matter to rest.

Walter William (who has some clips on Youtube) has offered a bet/cash to anyone who can prove that the Bible (& Islam for that matter) characters (most) are nothing more than ficticious pple.

He argues that religions and most of his-story are concoctions meant for control, to establish white supremacy and to entrench Zionists in power.

Go grab his cash.

[wordword31]

Mary, son of Jesus lineage is not recorded in the Scriptures.

[whatigottado2]

@wordword31 why not cuz that is the only way he could biologicaly tied to david because joseph was not his biological father so none of his blood would be in him. and if joseph is his father then he wasnt born of a virgin. and why do the catholics still call mary "virgin" when she clearly had more children.