rp, you have twisted what he actually said far too much exposing your zionnazi agenda for all to see. His time in the starirway before the towers fell can not be explained by you criminal freaks.
I'm just sick & tired of people being vilified or put down for questioning the official story. I mean, if you look back at all that went on during the Bush / Cheney administration. To just "take their word for it" on anything would be absurd! When you go back & look at how long it took W to approve the 9/11 Commission (442 days) and then the odd conditions that Bush & Cheney laid out as far as their testimony was concerned, let's just say it was peculiar to say the least & suspicious at best.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?
If you want to use the same old tired "WTC buildings 1 & 2 were hit by planes" line, look up the following video on YouTube: "Plane Hits Empire State Building" The last time I checked, the Empire State Building is still standing in place & wasn't reduced to dust & rubble after being hit by a B-25 Bomber. The fact of the matter is that if you choose to believe the official story, no matter how absurd, that's exactly what you'll do. I'm not trying to convince anybody of anything regarding 9/11.
Yet those 4 buildings didn't collapse into their basements on 9/11 & the concrete from the cores of those buildings didn't turn into massive clouds of fine dust particles. No, they remained standing for weeks before they were brought down by controlled demolition. Then & only then did they collapse into their basement and their concrete cores were turned into fine dust. Watch the video 911 Truth: Structural Failures vs. Controlled Demolitions & then tell me you still believe the official story.
Now, let's say that all of that somehow did miraculously happen. Now, on top of that, you're saying that one of these smoldering trees as it disintegrated into sawdust & evenly chopped wood, struck a nearby tree and 7 - 8 hours later it behaved in the exact same manner as the first 2 trees, except without the use of the axe nor the can of petrol. You can say the building fell because of the damage sustained, but what of WTC's 3, 4, 5, 6? The damage sustained by them was considerably greater.
The concrete dust is what suggests foul play to me. In a building collapse, the concrete would break into pieces, but the majority of the mass of concrete would remain solid & not turn into fine dust. If you went to a forest with an axe and a can of petrol & you chopped a portion of 2 trees as if to try to cut them down, & you set fire to that spot & let it burn for an hour, the tree wouldn't spontaneously turn into sawdust & evenly chopped wood while it collapsed into the ground. Would it?
NIST determined damage was not significant in the collapse and fire was the primary cause and the failure of a single column 79 would of resulted in collapse whatever the cause...so you are in contradiction with the NIST report
WTC7 was not damaged on its north side. If it was damaged on its south side as claimed then it would have collasped on its south side. But it didn't - it collapsed within its own footprint, contrary to the laws of physics.
Half of the news reports also get the tower numbers wrong, that does not mean Barry did not experience the events. This video is stupid, you are diverting from the point. A typical troll move. The sick thing about this is you either have a 30IQ after investigating 9/11 as much as you have, or you are a paid shill with a treason agenda. After reviewing your work, the latter seems the most likely explaination for you. I posted a video reply of one of your WTC 7 explosions you say do not exist
I wish you and your Paranoid Delusional CT Pals would go into a NYFD station and start troweling out your absurd CT BS. Let me know before you do it, so I can watch the firemen beat the shit out of you. You're the scum here.
@LindatrollBZ Firemen beat up an investigative patriot that does not believe government liars that used and abused the FDNY responders for ten years now? CNN poll: 90% of 8582 voters believe there was a government coverup of 9/11, November 10, 2004. 90% of Afghan men do not even know 9/11 happened, let alone what happened and who did it. The enemy you fight does not know why you are fighting them in Iraq and Afghanistan. What legal proof do you have Bin Laden had any connection to 9/11?
@IranContraScumDid911 WTF!? INCREDULITY? IS THAT ALL YOU HAVE! The only meaningfull stat you need to know is...>95% of all HardCore 911 CT Nutters are: 1. Teenage Boys. 2. Frustrated, uneducated young men. 3. Paranoid Delusionals. THAT'S IT! Take your pick. You and your kind are scum. Insulting the memory of the victims and influencing impressionable youngsters to enter your stupid CT CircleJerk. Friggin PERVS!
@LindaStevensBZ Typical. So let me translate your comment ....... you have NO proof, just heresay. Teenagers and "young men" are not even old enough to understand 9/11. They are the only people that would question rewriting the US Constitution and rebuilding the middle east with their hard earned tax dollars while keeping the boprders open and making muslim Visas easier to get? You have lost your mind or never were taught about American justice. Secrecy is for "PERVS", open truth is American.
@LindaStevensBZ Linda, the strangest of all criminal theories is the one offered by those that are also habitual liars, the bush administration. Remember Condi [my husband George] stating with a bold face, "we never imagined planes being used,,," just a few short months after the Italian meetings, where they positioned several SAM batteries all around it to shoot down any possible planes off course and too close to the big-whig liars???
Anything is possible in this crazy world, but I wonder how many of the 9-11 conspiracy people out there suffer from Hate Bush Syndrome, I followed the news die hard back in the Clinton days into the Bush days, it always seems the republicans got bashed by the media, it was pretty funny to watch and sad! The people on the left always seem more intolerant, sneaky and their methods of gaining followers is easier to achieve (class warfare, creating division amongst the country, ect..)UNITED WE STAND
Obviously it was in the media if I've seen all the clips. The point I'm making was the 7 collapse footage wasn't shown after 911 and wasn't played over and over again like the towers. If you doubt that I talk to people then try the test yourself and see how many people still never heard of it. Shit even Donald Rumsfeld and Joe lieberman are on video one denying the existence and the other claiming they never heard of it. I will send the vid and you can claim the majority of people know. LOL!!
Actually I ask everyday citizens on the street,at the grocery story,at work and wherever the opportunity presents itself. You know whats funny and ironic is I live in N.Y.. I will take you through some bullet points of why the prior knowledge of the collapse of 7 is so significant & further proves inside job.
The excuse from "Debunkers" that the inevitable collapse was easily detected because the sound of creaking and bowing is not sufficient with reality and can be proven unrealistic.
Exactly how did you come to the conclusion that I was arguing the case for demo by bringing attention to the fact that the collapse of 7 is largely unknown to the general public? If you want to debate the case for demo I will be glad to present my case.. I was responding to your comment that the Govt has no control of the media which I gave a perfect example of how they are able to suppress an event as large as a 610 ft tower collapsing into it's footprint on 911. Your insults shows defeat.
You have some pretty harsh words for someone so sure of their self. I find it odd that I didn't know about building 7 until 5 years after the fact. Never heard a peep about it on the news or seen any footage of the collapse like the media showed the towers coming down over and over again for months. I have asked many,many strangers if they ever heard of wtc7 and not a single one to this day know what I'm talking about. You can be rest assured the Govt has no influence of media. LOL!
Why didn't the Verizon building or post office collapse like 7 did? For that matter any of the other surrounding bldgs that were damaged far more and had larger,longer lasting fires somehow were able to withstand damage and fire.. Excuses is all I hear from you people. PATHETIC!!! Oh and it did fall into it's footprint a good 95%. That's like shaving your head and missing a few hairs and then claiming you didn't get a haircut.
ok ill admit there was damage on the sout side (still not enough to bring it down in my opinion) but how do u explain the silverstein interview were he says he gave the order to pull it, and im hopeing to get an answer off you because im willing to learn something new and change my opinion if im wrong , but evey time i ask questions of ye debunkers im met with insults and child like answers so please im not ooking to argue just wondering how you explain his interview
ok, so the firefighters withdrew because they thought it was unstable, that's great - how does it account for the straight down free-fall speed collapse? Being unstable would make for a much more untidy collapse.
so there may have been damage... but not enough to collapse like it did in one fell swoop..no way. i'd believe in Santa Claus before believing the lies they are throwing down your throat. Quit watching FOX news
watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA Ok so the debris hits the southside and it collapses. But I still don't understand why the building would fall the way it did HOURS after an impact that was strong enough to pulverize the building. could you please explain this. Having a video that says "the building was hit" doesn't explain anything.
LOOK, why do so many first responders have rare blood cancers never before seen in young people? Ask yourself that.. Asbestos doesnt lead to these rare cancers. evidence is so overwhelming and I still see these self righteous pricks who say "I dont believe all this conspiracy nonsense" like they are taking the moral high ground. Stop being foolish
@troutmask1970 He says "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they may not be able to contain the fire. I said 'you know, we've had such terrible loss of life maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it' (in other words he did not have the authority to give the order so he made a suggestion to the commander) and they they (The fire department command) made that decision to pull (As in pull rescue operations) and then we watched the building collapse" v=7WYdAJQV100
@MyNameIsBob212 I had no idea the term "Pull it" means a group of Firefighters? So when referring to multiple people you use the word "IT" to address them? Another odd thing is the fact the Firefighters were made to stop all operations rather early in the day and ordered to create a collapse zone for the tower they knew hours ahead of time would magically collapse. NIST claims extraordinary events happened for the global collapse so how could they guess a collapse hours before?
Larry Silverstein was caught on phone asking his insurance agency to authorise a controlled demolition. This was reported by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro of Fox News on April 22, 2010.
ahh no point in arguing with you since your eyes don't see further than your screen. I wonder to how many people you say these thing in your real life. I guess non since you have no life beyond internet and TV.
@12Weasel You must keep in mind that media is controlled by government so they put on the new and the shows only what they want. A lot of other opinions are not even heard because they don't come out. At the and, those who will want to know more will find out what is really happening. I respect your opinion and i have nothing against you but you should respect others opinions also and don't insult them. Have a nice time, Peace!
Barry Jennings told of us about the explosions that went off while he was inside WTC7, just prior to the first "plane crash". If you can't tell a controlled demolition when you see it, with a countdown and everything else,n you shouldn't be lying on you tube like a shill, about tower 7. You are too dumb or you haven't seen the footage I have seen.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
@12Weasel There are a lot of people that explained that fire couldn't bring such a building down and that damage alone was not big enough. One guy that was evolved in building of the twin towers said that it was built so strong that it could absorb 3 planes like that and it would still not fall. Usually people that are defending the official statements are payed scientist. So why would they tell the truth? And why do you have to use such language? You're just showing your intelligence
Well I spend a lot of my time on this subject and not only how the WTC 7 fall but how did the whole story occur and why. I will change my mind when somebody else will tell the "official" story that actually makes sense.
I have done my study on this and I have made my own opinion. I have listened to both sides of this story and the official story just doesn't end up. And you don't need to offend me because I don't agree with your opinion.
Sorry, my mother language is not english so it's not perfect, but anybody can see what i meant. I guess you're just looking for mistakes so you can make your stupid comments all over youtube. And I have facts very clear, apparently much more than you do. I guess you just can't handle the truth.
Everybody is duscussing about how the towers failed down. But why aren't people asking their self how the plains got there? Terrorists that live in the cave? Oh please, that's so stupid. And how come nobody tried to stop them? They saw it was out of the it's "right" route but they did nothing about that. They say that air-force had some problems that day and only that day! Coincidence? I don't think so.
what a load of crap if you have a 20 storey hole gouged out of one side of the building that becomes the weakest point and will stress every steel column or member on THAT same side of the structure thus overloading and load shifting IN that direction ...NOT FREE FALLING IN ITS OWN FOOT PRINT (thousands of engineers dispute this fact and will one day be vindicated )who knows maybe even wiki leaks will find that golden egg that shows the truth..fingers crossed
@joxxk really. ok lets say you could have 5.5 billion by creating all this mess. would you take that or would you continue to collect hundreds of millions of dollars a year in rent on the buildings? dont twist the truth joxx, explosive remains is way to vague a statement here and it does no credit to the people who died that day. instead, try this, "chemical elements were found at the site which were consistant with whats found in some explosives." be truthful.
I will give the fat moron one benefit of the doubt. It you look at the distribution of debris from the plane that hit the south tower, components were found beyond WTC7 and the Post Office. WTC7 may have received damage that began fires before WTC1 collapsed. Such as the 7 foot long titanium shaft at the heart of those GE or Rolls Royce engines, spinning at over 10k RPM, which certainly exited the north face of WTC2, going full tilt boogie. But primary cause of destruction was debris from WTC1.
I get a real kick out of the hoaxers assumption that a buildings lease holder actually has the power to order a building to be illegally and dangerously demolished. Can you imagine if you were given that order? By the "lease holder"? Would you obey it? How stupid are they and how stupid do they think everyone else is?
thousands of scientist have found Nano thermite in the towers. Larry Silverstein even said they had to "pull it". Because it was damaged on the inside. I'm pretty sure to pull a tower it would take time in advance to set up the explosives"nano thermite".
Say what you want, argue about extent of damage and fire involvement, but common sense says you do not have a symmetrical collapse with random fires burning at random intensities and asymmetrical damage. Furthermore, it just does not make sense that buildings 3,4,5 and 6 are standing the next day when it can be argued that building 7 was farther from a tower than any of the rest.
You are completely twisting the Barry Jennings interview in this video. If you actually watched and understood his testimony, you wouldnt keep stopping the tape and asking questions. Ive watched some of your other videos regarding tower 7s collapse and again you ignore crucial information out there, and even suggest 7 didnt fall into its own footprint. YOUR OWN picture proves it does. THIS GUY IS NOT A GOOD SOURCE FOR 9/11 TRUTH
@allowmetointroducems He takes things and exaggerates things. Like oh technically it didn't fall in it's own footprint because it was actually half an inch away from it so the claim that it fell into it's footprint is completely unfounded.
If the WC7 building had collapsed because of some damage to it's face, it would not have fallen straight down like it did. All four corners came striaght down, like they were cut.
@newtubetubetube I guess once we 'move on' the government will end all the wars that they still use 9/11 to justify then, like the one in Afghanistan? Or maybe I could blow up your fucking home with you in it and we'll see how 'average' your dead ass finds it
@dubified89 Yes, move on. All you guys do is crying and crying. None of you had the courage to disband this government of liar and murderer when it was time. It been 10 fucking years, none of them will be brought to justice ever. You lost you chance, you cried for years on youtube instead of acting.
And btw, if you ever threat again to blow my house i will report you to the cyber police.
i think 9/11 attack ....was the support of the USA toward israel ex( using the veto agains the Arab & Muslim world-weapons-taxe money many other help etc etc + because Israel is above the law !!
You should remove this video. NIST themselves have debunked your claim that WTC 7 was so seriously damaged that it helped with the collapse of the building. NIST claims that fire alone was the only main cause for the collapse of WTC 7. You fail.
Why wasn't building 7 mentioned in the 9/11 commission report ?. Even the NIST's investigation is flawed. The Report does not explain why or how the buildings totally collapsed, or explain the demolition like features of the collapses, such as their explosiveness, pulverization. NIST simply avoids these issues by claiming that global collapse was inevitable ? Many people in the buildings said that they heard or felt explosions. Just like Barry Jennings a witness that was bumped off by the NWO.
@giptonsilly you are referring to an old report. Recheck. Just 2 days ago I watched a TV programm on phoenix (Germany's major news station, I live here) were the collapse of WTC7 was discussed. NIST was mentioned too in a thorough computer model analysis. You may have to recheck your facts.
@MWcrazyhorse The trouble here as the government is so corrupt I really can't trust a third party to lie to the world for there own agenda. What I really want to see is a proper discussion broadcast live on TV with structual engineers, and people who know what they are talking about and not a bunch of know it all morons like on here.
They would obviously not have to worry about trying to trick people on 9-11 the whole world would had to be tricked if these things were controlled demolitions which they were.
The fact that explosives were going well before the building collapsed does not prove that it was not a controlled demolition what this video is doing is, it is failing to take the timing of the explosions in the context of the event. In other words if it was a demolition it would likely not have been a standard one because it would be attempted to fit the context of the event. IE Air planes and the towers collapsing brought it down. If it was a standard demolition it would all be done at once.
Well everyone makes mistakes that does not prove that what he is saying is untrue just because mabey he got the order wrong on the crash of WTC and he was inside the lobby which is not viewable from out side. You would have to be in the lobby to tell duh! Why did 2nd building hit come down first instead of the 1st one that got hit the 1st one was burning longer.
I don't understand why the people of New York City are making such a "civilized" fuss over this proposed mosque. Were the people on those two planes, and in those two towers, slaughtered peacefully? If you don't want the mosque built near ground zero, just slaughter a few pigs on the property, bleed them out good, and leave some guts on the property. This should desecrate the property for Muslims, forever. Desecrate it with pigs' blood.
i am still not convince that WTC7 fell in that manner because of the big debris from the other tower. i am not bias but so far the so called conspiracy theorist convince me more that it was an inside job. but i'm open to any evidence saying it otherwise. hook me.
@kenteles -NY TIMES 12/20/2001 City Had Been Warned of Fuel Tank at 7 World Trade Center
"Fire Department officials warned the city and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1998 and 1999 that a giant diesel fuel tank for the mayor's $13 million command bunker in 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story high-rise that burned and collapsed on Sept. 11, posed a hazard and was not consistent with city fire codes.
@kenteles --The 6,000-gallon tank was positioned about 15 feet above the ground floor and near several lobby elevators and was meant to fuel generators that would supply electricity to the 23rd-floor bunker in the event of a power failure.
@kenteles --Although the city made some design changes to address the concerns - moving a fuel pipe that would have run from the tank up an elevator shaft, for example - it left the tank in place. But the Fire Department repeatedly warned that a tank in that position could spread fumes throughout the building if it leaked, or, if it caught fire, could produce what one Fire Department memorandum called "disaster."
@kenteles - therefor the explosions that you see is the tank exploding and the pipes that are connected to it going up the elevator shafts. that explosion was cased by the fire igniting the tank. the explosion plus the structural damage to the building already caused by the falling debris was the cause of the callapse. as you can see in the video the explosions only happend on ONE side. tell me this "truthers", how can you have a "controled demolition" while useing explosives to ONLY ONE SIDE?
If you showed the collapse of WTC7 to people who didn't know or recognize it was part of 9/11 they would instantly think CD, because it looks like CD. Instantaneous total structural failure collapsing at free fall. No other high rise steel framed structure had ever collapsed in this manner from fire before 9/11 nor has any since. If there had been a real investigation of the collapse the structural steel would have been examined to determine how and why it happened. But we're still waiting.
wow this guy is a cafateria researcher. because barry misspoke about which building fell this guy disqualifies him but when he says something that helps his argument then barry is a qualified witness again. debunk this RP. how was there molten metal found at wtc 1,2,and 7.
@representativepress Are you unaware that 9/11 was an inside job, that the 3 WTC skyscrapers were demolished with highly energetic material like thermitic material?!?
You seem to be on target on everything else, so this really disturbs me. All academics i showed the WTC7 freefall collapse footage at least agreed that it was highly suspicious.
Loose change was the earliest documentary to expose the controlled demolition of the WTC and the overall inside job.
@KnastPlanet "Loose Change" is a FICTIONAL movie...Hear it from Dylan himself. Pay close attention to what he says in the 1st 55 seconds. watch?v=3ZjJQWNQZog
Bullshit! Dr. Alan Sabrosky Jewish American Top Marine former Director of US War College says the evidence is overwhelming that Israel did 911 just like they did the USS Liberty and JFK!!!
@elucidative That's complete BS. There is absolutely no evidence of Jewish involvement in this. So weak to blame the Jews. Typical racist stupid crap.
@USAneedsaChange LOL being called a racist after mentioning a internationally well known event like when the unmarked Israeli jets attacked the USS Liberty in a false flag attack to provoke a war with Egypt. They couldn't sink her so then they had Israeli ships torpedo and napalm the USS Liberty but God held it afloat. Then the criminal LBJ tried to cover it up but the other nations knew what happened. Just knowing history is now racist. 90% of the racism wailers are Khazars not Semitic.
so the south side of the building was totaly gone, damaged, engulfed in flames yet this massive structure came down perfectly straight? Yeah right, at least the twins had holes in them and they didn't fall from the bottom up. 9/11 stinks in the worst way. One day the truth will be exposed.
That "Mysterious deaths of 9-11 eyewitnesses" video is crap. It includes Barry Jennings, who had nothing but contempt for the truth movement. He was not a truther and you should look into how the truth movment has twisted his initial statement after walked out of WTC 7.
It's OK Diskpanic, we know who you are. When the dust settles you'll get a nice room with padded walls and a little, black and white TV with three square meals passed to you thru the slot.
It'll be a nice life, far from the reality of the real world. This little fantasy that you've created will eventually dissipate,, hopefully.
It's obvious that Barry Jennings is saying that first one tower fell, then the next. He is not saying first the north tower (tower 1) collasped, then the south (tower 2).
At 2:30 you're talking about an explosion when WTC 1 hit building 7. Ummm...the impact of WTC 1 into WTC 7 would be just that, an impact & not an explosion.
Yes the person who made this video is a really bad dis info agent. Who am I going to believe; the guy who was inside WTC 7( who mysteriously disappeared and missed his appearance at the 911 commission) or the Representive Press. Easy answer
I don't think representativepress is a disinfo agent. I just know he's wrong. that's all. He still hasn't figured 9/11 out yet or chooses not make it known that he has because he thinks he'll lose subscribers if he changes his position, which is probably true. Alot of 9/11 debunker types do subscribe to his channel. He does deserve credit for speaking out against zionism. Zionism, which is not to be confused with anti-semitism. Fuck that game they like to play!
If you can watch the collapse of the the WTC towers and pretend to not see massive explosions hurling tons of steel and vaporized concrete upwards of 500 feet, then you are blind, stupid, or a paid sock-puppet troll.
If you can watch the collapse of the the WTC towers and pretend to not see massive explosions hurling tons of steel and vaporized concrete upwards of 500 feet, then you are blind, stupid, or a paid sock-puppet troll.
Odd isn't it that the arguments in this video, doesn't include one single version of the actual collapse as captured by four networks.
Could it be that the arguments would fall flat if we saw that building 7 fell exactly as if it was one of those controlled demolitions you see on various documentaries. Pretty much straight down.
It appears that at least one side of the building was intact, no fire, no damage. In that case, the building should have just toppled over.
Your refusal to concede these well established, and easily observable, facts proves your maliciousness and obstruction of justice regarding the crimes of 911. Treason is punishable by death. Would you testify under oath? Swear on the Bible? Commit perjury? Look in the mirror, you can be something other than what you see at this time
2) Massive explosions? Do you even know what an explosion looks like? You mean "massive explosions" like these? (Turn up your speakers to max, so you can hear them clearly.)
watch?v=3BgBc3alUd4
3) Thermite residue?
Did you know that there is no such thing as an incomplete thermite reaction? There is no such thing as thermite residue? Did you know that Jones, Harrit, etal have yet to submit their work to peer review? Why is that?
Your refusal to concede the massive explosions that are easily observable in the video and audio records is evidence that you are not sincere regarding what happened on 911.
You are a disgrace to humanity for using your intelligence in this way. In particular, You are an insult to thousands of people who have suffered under the ongoing fraud of 911
Did you know that 4.4% of Americans suffer from PPD or PS? You are probably one of those people. Have you ever sought psychological help for your paranoia? They make anti-anxiety pills for people EXACTLY like you.
STATE YOUR CREDENTIALS! Oops. You have none. I doubt you even have an undergrad degree.
What explosions? Explosions make noise. Explosions are unmistakably loud. You can't HIDE explosions. See, you don't even know what an explosion is or what it does to matter, do you?
If you do, please, for the benefit of the 95.5% of Americans that don't belong to the 9/11 Truther CULT, explain to us what an explosion actually IS.
they all knew it was going to collapse, they cleared the area pretty successfully, i would hope. i saw them implode a stadium in indiana, from afar didnt hear too much, except for the rumble of the imploding structure.....
You are a douchebag. Not only are you totally ignorant of physics, physical sciences, and logic and reason, you present ZERO POSITIVE EVIDENCE for your accusation.
YOU, as the ACCUSER, are REQUIRED to present EVIDENCE! Without evidence, you are just making accusations. Accusations without EVIDENCE is lying. Present evidence or shut the hell up.
Another comment as well...up until 9/11, no steel structure EVER had collapsed before. Now we suddenly have fireman that are expert engineers and can assess the structural integrity of a building. The only reason they believed it could collapse was what had happened to the twin towers.
1) You have no video of the building from the south side. The pictures have a large mass of the tower leaning against it, but no true damage has been done to the 7th tower.
2. Interestingly, Oaklahoma City is mentioned. If you remember, ALMOST HALF of this building was obliterated, yet it DID NOT FALL. It had to be brought down with timed detonations.
Are you serious? You do realize that there are other places you can see videos on YouTube, nutjob. If you actually cared about "the truth" (you don't, admit it), you would have actually taken the 30 seconds it would take to search YouTube for "WTC7 South Side". Seriously, you nutjobs are the laziest bunch of faux intellectuals I've ever come across.
this guy is probably paid by someone like silverstein to cover up this murder of poor american citizens ..by conspirators and world money tycoons and businessman to get the oil from m.east.
what should we get over exactly,,,,,,,,you ignarant fuckstick exmech2,,,,,,,,,,should we get over the deceptions and the lies,,,,,,,,,,,should we get over the carnage and murder,,,,,,,,,should we get over the troops dying in a bogus war,,,,,,,,,,should we get over the established elite marking our lives as meaningless,,,,,,,,should we get over their arrogance and evil agenda,,,,,,,,,should we get over the taking of our rights and civil liberties,,,,,,,or get over the one world government agenda
I know that doing honest research is difficult. I know this because I've had to do hard research when I worked on my Masters degree. What I don't understand, however, is why you people call yourselves "Truthers" and say you are so interested in the "Truth", yet you do nothing in order to find it.
watch?v=LRkQ7Tr9Q3o
This video CLEARLY shows that WTC7 leaned to the south during its collapse. Nuff said. You're a nutjob.
@diskpanic if you believe that this building came down from natural causes,,,,,,,,you may as well wipe your ass with your masters degree,,,,,,,because you are unable to use any annalytical thin king skills,,,,,,,,,if there was this catastrophic damage to the south side,,,,,,the building would have fell very drastically to that side my friend,,,,,how did the undamaged side fall symetrically with the south side,,,,,,,wake up masters,,,,,,,i piss on you because you are in the way of the truth
Lay off the sauce, Truther. Did you even look at the video I posted? No, of course not, you drunken, Truther nutjob. You are obviously an uneducated peasant of the first order. The COMMA is NOT A TOY, you ignorant sack of feces.
You're the sort of sack of crap that believes the tower came down in 7 seconds, because the video on some TRUTHER MYTHOLOGY website shows it collapsing in 7 seconds. You have never looked at the full footage, have you?
@diskpanic I have looked at everything my friend,,,,,,,,over and over,,,,,,,thousands of times,,,,,,,,and no one will ever make me believe that a building can fall the way it did,,,,,,,,,without some major help,,,,,,,,so if you actually believe this happened as advertised,,,,,,,,why don't they just hit the lobby of a building in vegas,,,,,,,,,,then start a few fires,,,,,,,,,and wait till the afternoon for the building to fall in it's own footprint neatly,,,,,,,,,no need for anymore demo industry
Ah, there it is! "no one will ever make me believe...", no, of course not, Truther nutjob. No one can EVER convince you otherwise. It's impossible. Not because of your conviction in the facts, but because of your paranoid delusion requires you to buy whatever Alex Jones is selling you. If GOD HIMSELF, in all of His Glory, came down from heaven and TOLD YOU that this was perpetrated by radical Islamic terrorists, you'd deny even Him, because NO ONE can convince you otherwise.
@diskpanic there you go making assumptions again diskpanic,,,,,,,,,,,i was firmly in belief of the official story until early 2004 my friend,,,,,,,,,then i actually took the time to look into some major issues,,,,,,,,,contadicting eyewitness reports,,,,,,major media blackout,,,,,,,,,,having an insider like phillip zelikow lead the investigation,,,,,,,,,,the total slap in the face to the american people was the comission report,,,,,it strangely did not make mention of building seven,,,,,farce!!!
I can tell just from your haphazard use of the English language that you are NOT, by any means, an educated man. You wouldn't know the first thing whether or not a building falling down was normal or not. You have ZERO expertise in the matter. All that matters to you is that Alex Jones and people like him with questionable credentials TELL YOU what to believe, and you just accept it. Why? Because it fits your paranoid delusion. Take your pills, nutjob.
@diskpanic this is not english class diskpanic,,,,,,,,,,i can right however i feel,,,,,,,,,,and i will debate circles around you any fucking daymy friend,,,,,,twice on sunday,,,,,,,,,alex jones has had very little to do with my research buddy,,,,,,,,i applaud him for his work and effort,,,,,,but i have been digging deeper than most people can wrap their feeble little minds around,,,,,,,,including you,,,,,,jim fetzner,,,,morgan reynolds,,,,judy wood,,,,these are the experts asking real questions
Exactly, Truther nutjob, you may "right" whatever you "feel". Lord knows, you Truthers don't THINK about things the way 88% of people do. Nor are you Truthers generally as educated, as you are a prime example of. Thank you for name dropping, by the way, for it has exposed you for an intellectual abscess (as if your butchering of grammar wasn't a huge clue). For those that don't know, Judy Wood suggested that an orbital energy weapon took down the Twin Towers. You agree with her?
@diskpanic I AGREE THAT IT WAS NOT A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF DEMOLITION LIKE BUILDING SEVEN,,,,,,THE TOWERS WERE ACTUALLY BLOWN ALMOST ENTIRELEY INTO DUST,,,,,,,,NO DOORKNOBS,,,NO CHAIRS,,,,,NO TELEPHONES,,,,,NO COMPUTERS,,,,NO CONCRETE,,,,,JUST A THICK BLANKET OF DUST COVERING MANHATTEN ,,,,,AND SOME STEEL,,,,,,,THE DEBRIS PILE WAS 3 STORIES HIGH,,,,THE REST WAS A MILE OF DUST,,,,,IT TAKES AN OBSCENE AMOUNT OF ENERGY TO DO THIS,,,,,,FLIPPED AND TOASTED CARS FOR A MILE,,,,,MASSIVE ENERGY RELEASE
@diskpanic THIS WAS A COVERT OPERATION,,,,,,,,AND THE MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES ARE ABOUT 30 YEARS AHEAD OF ANYTHING WE HAVE EVER SEEN,,,,,,,,COVERT MEANS TO APPEAR AS SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT,,,,,,,NOW DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE MILITARY STANDS BY AND LETS HIGHLY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES GO TO WASTE,,,,,,THE FAKE PLANES WERE USED,,,,TO MAKE US BELIEVE THE PANCAKE WAS POSSIBLE,,,,,,,,BUT COVERTLY THERE WERE SOME HIGHLY ADVANCED WEAPONRY AT WORK HERE,,,,,,COVERTNESS,,,,,LIKE PULLING RABBIT FROM HAT
LMAO! So you do buy into her crap. Ladies and gentlemen of the rational public. I rest my case. Here we have yet another Truther raving that the towers were brought down by ray guns from outer space. These lunatics think that it makes more sense that a giant raygun in outer space destroyed the tower than the inexorable pull of gravity which kills how many thousands of people a year from avalanches, jumping off of buildings, to structure collapses?
For more information about the nutjobs that this particular Truther idiot name dropped, please see:
watch?v=T6fe9YlHQwA
You'll learn all about these idiots, how they have ZERO credentials, how they are prima facie insane, and how they are obviously in it for the money, not the "truth".
@diskpanic YOU HAVE A HARD TIME STICKING WITH THE FACTS DON'T,,,,,,,YOU FUCKING WASTE OF SPACE,,,,,,,,THE FACT IS THESE MASSIVE BUILDINGS,,,,,,,AMONG THE STRONGEST BUILT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR WORLD,,,,,,,,,SOMEHOW WERE RUDUCED TO EXTREMELY FINE DUST,,,,,,,,,HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT YOU OFFICIAL TREE HUGGER,,,,,,,,GRAVITY WILL BREAK CONCRETE AND OFFICE CONTENT INTO PIECES,,,,,,,BUT DOES NOT HAVE THE NECESSARY ENERGY TO TURN THEM INTO FINE DUST,,,,,,,ALL OF MANHATTON IS COATED WITH DUST YOU FUCK!!
@diskpanic ZERO CREDENTIALS,,,,,,,A DOCTOR OF SCIENCE,,,,,,,A PROFESSOR,,,,,,,,AND A FORMER BUSH INSIDER,,,,,,,,THESE PEOPLE ARE KOOKS WITH NO CREDENTIALS,,,,,,,,YOU MAY BE THE MOST IGNORANT,,,,,,,,DUMMEST ,,,,,,,,MOST IRRATIONAL,,,,,,,,,AND DELUSION,,,,,,,,FUCKING RETARD I EVER MET,,,,,,,,,,DID I NOT TELL YOU TO GO SLIT YOUR THROAT IN THE MIRROR,,,,,,,SO YOU CAN WATCH YOURSELF DIE,,,,,,,,,,NO WAIT USE MY MIRROR,,,,,,,,,THEN I WILL PISS IN YOUR OPEN NECK WOUND,,,,,,,,AS I CACKLE WITH JOY!!!!
LOL Since it's obvious that you don't know, there are a lot of different branches of "science". See, you can't get a degree in, say, Physics, and be able to speak any more authoritatively about Chemistry than, say, a Sophomore in college. That's the thing you nutjobs just don't get. You are so easily impressed by all those fancy letters at the end of someone's name (except, of course, when the person doesn't agree with your brand of stupidity).
Please watch one of the WTC collapse videos. If you do not see massive explosions then you are either blind, dumb, or disingenuous. If you refuse to acknowledge free fall then you are simply an asshole, a traitor, and a humiliation to the human race. Treason is punishible by death. Use your intelligence for the good. God never sleeps.
And since you have no idea what "free fall" is (unsurprising, because you are a Truther, and science, reason, and logic are lost on you), then please care to explain why the debris falling beside the building actually hits the ground before the tower finishes collapsing if the tower is collapsing at free fall? NOTE: Even your Truther high priests no longer assert free fall of WTC1 or WTC2.
And, as I said to one of your fellow nutjobs, you wouldn't know the Truth if it climbed into a 757 shouting "Allah Akbar!" and ran over your ignorant nutjob arse.
Amazingly well educated response to a logical argument. I'm going straight to hell, you uneducated peasant? You wouldn't know hell if it rose out of the Pit and sodomized you before dragging you down to the great Deceiver with whom you share so much in common.
No, nutter, Jesus is my savior, and whether I go to hell or not is between me and Him. Lucky for me, nutjobs like you don't get to pick who does and who does not deserve Redemption. Have fun mumbling obscenities to yourself.
this video is a FUCKING DISGRACE,,,,,,,,,,OH YEAH THE ENTIRE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS GONE,,,,,,,,,BUT INSTEAD OF THE BUILDING FALLING TOWARDS THAT SIDE THAT HAS SUCH CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE,,,,,,,,,IT COMES NEATLY STRAIGHT DOWN,,,,,,,,,SO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH NO DAMAGE FELL JUST AS FAST AS THE SIDE THAT HAD THIS SO CALLED SEVER DAMAGE,,,,,,,,HOW CAN UNDAMAGED TRUSSES FALL JUST AS FAST AS DAMAGED ONES,,,,,,,,,THIS CANNOT FUCKING HAPPEN,,,,,,,,AND WHOEVER SUPPORTS THIS GARBAGE FUCK OFF
wrong answer diskpanic,,,,,,,,,if you were a little smarter,,,,,,,,,,you would know how stupid you sound when you talk like that,,,,,,,,,,all of the photos and videos show the rubble pile of building 7 neatly laid in it's own footprint,,,,,,,,,,not even damaging buildings that are right beside it,,,,,,,,,,and barely reaching halfway across the street,,,,,,,,,,so what is your significant evidence that forty seven stories fell to the south,,,,,,,,,did larry silverstein tell you that ,,,,,,,,,,haha
How irritating to find people who join themselves to support the press organisations. Fuck them! It's them that supported this war and medtiatised terrorism as a mean of war.
This video is a sheer fact in its self:IT says half of the building had gone... ? WHAT? WHERE? WTF are they talking about?
and then, it collapsed.
Oh, yeah it collapased nice and tidy.
2 minutes ago, only half of it was gone...
Be serious one minute, we all know something's wrong.
Ok Barry made a mistake like a writer making a typo. He knows the sequence, we all do, right? Think of something else.
Ok forget about that. Where is videos, pictures even, of the damage of the other side of building seven, you have everything else.
And have you ever seen a building fall like these three buildings did without some kind of control? It has never happened before. There is why too much evidence pointed at control demolition and you know it. It is only a matter of time...
For one, everyone was in shock that day, and you schmucks seem to think someone ought, in all that chaos, shock and confusion, to think of everything.
Furthermore, you want photos of a severely damaged side of a building covered in smoke - morons.
Lastly, you seem to think your movement ("Truthers") are on a roll, and headed for a breakthrough. No, you are not. You are pretentious, troubled individuals, who have a need to feel superior. That is all
deerstop how can you turn a blind eye to alll the evidence,,,,,,,,,people are waking up to the cold hard truth,,,,,,,,,only 24 percent of people out there believe the government story fully,,,,,,,,you are in the minority now my friend,,,,,,,,,,,and even if they never admit to their crimes ,,,,,,,,,,,at least people are educating themselves on the deception,,,,,,,,,you should too
Far from turning a blind eye, I've been reading it. Far too much of it. I'm sad to say it's mostly all a waste of time.
On the other hand, I'm actually glad we have sceptical people spending heaps of time on such issues. Perhaps the day will come when they actually accomplish something - uncover some actual conspiracy or other act of betrayal.
I've never said I believe the entire official story (is there one?), but I discard the vast majority of what 9/11 Truthers have claimed. Too much noise.
Is there an official story???yes there is my friend,,,,,,and it is so conviluted and contrived it makes us sick to our fucking stomach,,,,,,,it is the most ultimate bullshit i have ever fucking heard,,,,,,,,shame on anyone who has actually accepted it,,,,,,,,,,this fucking story is so full of shit it has religious people standing in awe!!! they had the biggest bullshit story of all time before the osama and 19 boxcutter story came out,,,,,,,,,what a slap in the face of all the american people!!
The problem with most Truthers is that they are (seriously speaking here) suffering from cognitive disassociation, meaning they are literally INCAPABLE of putting things that they sense properly together with their logical antecedents, like rational people do. 4.4% of Americans suffer from paranoid personality disorder or paranoid schizophrenia. Fewer than 5% of Americans buy MIHOP Truther theories. Coincidence? I think not.
Ok what about when a plane hit the Empire state building? it didn't collapse. And there's never been a building fire that caused a building to fall down before EVER til 911. There were witnesses that survived from the twin towers that said there were explosions BEFORE the planes even hit! Also a guy from the company that inspected the twin tower's steel before it was used on the towers says that it would have to take 3000F degrees to melt non-fireproof steel.
It doesn't matter how much physical damage of fire that No7 suffered If it was going to fall it would never fall straight down.I just love this 'gouyz' cheesy NY accent.
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH WHAT ELSE I CAN SAY ABOUT THAT SHIT ??
just waste my fucking time -.-
NO BIG DAMAGE AT WTC7
duzotepp 4 months ago
they only used planes because they have no satellites, no aircraft carriers, no attack helicopters, no fighter jets, nothing really
They didn't exactly have lots of options
eDemocracyUK 4 months ago
rp, you have twisted what he actually said far too much exposing your zionnazi agenda for all to see. His time in the starirway before the towers fell can not be explained by you criminal freaks.
ISamuelII 5 months ago
I'm just sick & tired of people being vilified or put down for questioning the official story. I mean, if you look back at all that went on during the Bush / Cheney administration. To just "take their word for it" on anything would be absurd! When you go back & look at how long it took W to approve the 9/11 Commission (442 days) and then the odd conditions that Bush & Cheney laid out as far as their testimony was concerned, let's just say it was peculiar to say the least & suspicious at best.
marshallt23 6 months ago 2
@marshallt23 Plane hit building. Big fire weaken steel. Big building no support. Fall down.
UGAUGA!
911sausageman 6 months ago
@911sausageman still dont explain building 7
poshuajerkins 1 month ago
@poshuajerkins Big building fall down. Hit smaller building. Big fire. No water. No fight. Building fall down.
UGAUGA!
911sausageman 1 month ago
@911sausageman you believe w/e u want BUDDY
poshuajerkins 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since the govt. committed 9/11, why arent truthers demanding the release of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed who is on trial for his life for a crime truthers claim he did not commit?
If there was no flight 93, please explain how 95% of the plane debris was recovered?
If there was no flight 77, please explain how 130+ witnesses reported seeing a plane?
ctcole77 1 month ago
If you want to use the same old tired "WTC buildings 1 & 2 were hit by planes" line, look up the following video on YouTube: "Plane Hits Empire State Building" The last time I checked, the Empire State Building is still standing in place & wasn't reduced to dust & rubble after being hit by a B-25 Bomber. The fact of the matter is that if you choose to believe the official story, no matter how absurd, that's exactly what you'll do. I'm not trying to convince anybody of anything regarding 9/11.
marshallt23 6 months ago
Yet those 4 buildings didn't collapse into their basements on 9/11 & the concrete from the cores of those buildings didn't turn into massive clouds of fine dust particles. No, they remained standing for weeks before they were brought down by controlled demolition. Then & only then did they collapse into their basement and their concrete cores were turned into fine dust. Watch the video 911 Truth: Structural Failures vs. Controlled Demolitions & then tell me you still believe the official story.
marshallt23 6 months ago
Now, let's say that all of that somehow did miraculously happen. Now, on top of that, you're saying that one of these smoldering trees as it disintegrated into sawdust & evenly chopped wood, struck a nearby tree and 7 - 8 hours later it behaved in the exact same manner as the first 2 trees, except without the use of the axe nor the can of petrol. You can say the building fell because of the damage sustained, but what of WTC's 3, 4, 5, 6? The damage sustained by them was considerably greater.
marshallt23 6 months ago
The concrete dust is what suggests foul play to me. In a building collapse, the concrete would break into pieces, but the majority of the mass of concrete would remain solid & not turn into fine dust. If you went to a forest with an axe and a can of petrol & you chopped a portion of 2 trees as if to try to cut them down, & you set fire to that spot & let it burn for an hour, the tree wouldn't spontaneously turn into sawdust & evenly chopped wood while it collapsed into the ground. Would it?
marshallt23 6 months ago
where's my wmd's bush/43?
TheVMFA333 7 months ago
NIST determined damage was not significant in the collapse and fire was the primary cause and the failure of a single column 79 would of resulted in collapse whatever the cause...so you are in contradiction with the NIST report
TheEots 7 months ago
WTC7 was not damaged on its north side. If it was damaged on its south side as claimed then it would have collasped on its south side. But it didn't - it collapsed within its own footprint, contrary to the laws of physics.
GoodVibezin 7 months ago
Half of the news reports also get the tower numbers wrong, that does not mean Barry did not experience the events. This video is stupid, you are diverting from the point. A typical troll move. The sick thing about this is you either have a 30IQ after investigating 9/11 as much as you have, or you are a paid shill with a treason agenda. After reviewing your work, the latter seems the most likely explaination for you. I posted a video reply of one of your WTC 7 explosions you say do not exist
IranContraScumDid911 8 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911
You 911 Nutters are such Losers.
I wish you and your Paranoid Delusional CT Pals would go into a NYFD station and start troweling out your absurd CT BS. Let me know before you do it, so I can watch the firemen beat the shit out of you. You're the scum here.
Pathetic freak.
LindaStevensBZ 7 months ago
@LindatrollBZ Firemen beat up an investigative patriot that does not believe government liars that used and abused the FDNY responders for ten years now? CNN poll: 90% of 8582 voters believe there was a government coverup of 9/11, November 10, 2004. 90% of Afghan men do not even know 9/11 happened, let alone what happened and who did it. The enemy you fight does not know why you are fighting them in Iraq and Afghanistan. What legal proof do you have Bin Laden had any connection to 9/11?
IranContraScumDid911 7 months ago
LindaStevensBZ 7 months ago
@LindaStevensBZ Typical. So let me translate your comment ....... you have NO proof, just heresay. Teenagers and "young men" are not even old enough to understand 9/11. They are the only people that would question rewriting the US Constitution and rebuilding the middle east with their hard earned tax dollars while keeping the boprders open and making muslim Visas easier to get? You have lost your mind or never were taught about American justice. Secrecy is for "PERVS", open truth is American.
IranContraScumDid911 7 months ago
@LindaStevensBZ Linda, the strangest of all criminal theories is the one offered by those that are also habitual liars, the bush administration. Remember Condi [my husband George] stating with a bold face, "we never imagined planes being used,,," just a few short months after the Italian meetings, where they positioned several SAM batteries all around it to shoot down any possible planes off course and too close to the big-whig liars???
A lawful crime investigation is what we need.
ISamuelII 5 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why won’t Dr. Steven Jones release the “rigorous non-critical” peer review comments offered by David L. Griscom regarding his nanothermite paper?
What did the USA give the government of Pakistan concerning Bin Laden and 911 in early October of 2001?
How can Operation Northwoods be an example of "false flag terrorism" if it never happened?
ctcole77 1 month ago
Anything is possible in this crazy world, but I wonder how many of the 9-11 conspiracy people out there suffer from Hate Bush Syndrome, I followed the news die hard back in the Clinton days into the Bush days, it always seems the republicans got bashed by the media, it was pretty funny to watch and sad! The people on the left always seem more intolerant, sneaky and their methods of gaining followers is easier to achieve (class warfare, creating division amongst the country, ect..)UNITED WE STAND
saltytsp 9 months ago
BULL SHIT IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE WHAT 1 OR 2 OR 2 OR 1 WHAT A FUCKING JOKE AND I HEAR THE JEW IN THIS MANS VOICE
19712033 9 months ago
@19712033
Yeah, he's the anti-israel jew, you fucking idiot.
IndividualParties 9 months ago
Obviously it was in the media if I've seen all the clips. The point I'm making was the 7 collapse footage wasn't shown after 911 and wasn't played over and over again like the towers. If you doubt that I talk to people then try the test yourself and see how many people still never heard of it. Shit even Donald Rumsfeld and Joe lieberman are on video one denying the existence and the other claiming they never heard of it. I will send the vid and you can claim the majority of people know. LOL!!
AiresQX4 9 months ago
Actually I ask everyday citizens on the street,at the grocery story,at work and wherever the opportunity presents itself. You know whats funny and ironic is I live in N.Y.. I will take you through some bullet points of why the prior knowledge of the collapse of 7 is so significant & further proves inside job.
The excuse from "Debunkers" that the inevitable collapse was easily detected because the sound of creaking and bowing is not sufficient with reality and can be proven unrealistic.
AiresQX4 9 months ago
Exactly how did you come to the conclusion that I was arguing the case for demo by bringing attention to the fact that the collapse of 7 is largely unknown to the general public? If you want to debate the case for demo I will be glad to present my case.. I was responding to your comment that the Govt has no control of the media which I gave a perfect example of how they are able to suppress an event as large as a 610 ft tower collapsing into it's footprint on 911. Your insults shows defeat.
AiresQX4 9 months ago
You have some pretty harsh words for someone so sure of their self. I find it odd that I didn't know about building 7 until 5 years after the fact. Never heard a peep about it on the news or seen any footage of the collapse like the media showed the towers coming down over and over again for months. I have asked many,many strangers if they ever heard of wtc7 and not a single one to this day know what I'm talking about. You can be rest assured the Govt has no influence of media. LOL!
AiresQX4 9 months ago
Why didn't the Verizon building or post office collapse like 7 did? For that matter any of the other surrounding bldgs that were damaged far more and had larger,longer lasting fires somehow were able to withstand damage and fire.. Excuses is all I hear from you people. PATHETIC!!! Oh and it did fall into it's footprint a good 95%. That's like shaving your head and missing a few hairs and then claiming you didn't get a haircut.
AiresQX4 9 months ago
ok ill admit there was damage on the sout side (still not enough to bring it down in my opinion) but how do u explain the silverstein interview were he says he gave the order to pull it, and im hopeing to get an answer off you because im willing to learn something new and change my opinion if im wrong , but evey time i ask questions of ye debunkers im met with insults and child like answers so please im not ooking to argue just wondering how you explain his interview
TrafficoneMan 9 months ago
ok, so the firefighters withdrew because they thought it was unstable, that's great - how does it account for the straight down free-fall speed collapse? Being unstable would make for a much more untidy collapse.
zppz 9 months ago
so there may have been damage... but not enough to collapse like it did in one fell swoop..no way. i'd believe in Santa Claus before believing the lies they are throwing down your throat. Quit watching FOX news
adamnfoool 10 months ago 2
watch?v=Atbrn4k55lA Ok so the debris hits the southside and it collapses. But I still don't understand why the building would fall the way it did HOURS after an impact that was strong enough to pulverize the building. could you please explain this. Having a video that says "the building was hit" doesn't explain anything.
artemismeow 11 months ago
What does the movie "the siege" and "battle L.A" have in common? you will see soon
tazukii 11 months ago
LOOK, why do so many first responders have rare blood cancers never before seen in young people? Ask yourself that.. Asbestos doesnt lead to these rare cancers. evidence is so overwhelming and I still see these self righteous pricks who say "I dont believe all this conspiracy nonsense" like they are taking the moral high ground. Stop being foolish
crisisofconsciousnes 11 months ago
then why does Silverstein say "we decided to pull it"? Explain that one.
troutmask1970 11 months ago
@troutmask1970 He says "I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they may not be able to contain the fire. I said 'you know, we've had such terrible loss of life maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it' (in other words he did not have the authority to give the order so he made a suggestion to the commander) and they they (The fire department command) made that decision to pull (As in pull rescue operations) and then we watched the building collapse" v=7WYdAJQV100
MyNameIsBob212 11 months ago
@MyNameIsBob212 I had no idea the term "Pull it" means a group of Firefighters? So when referring to multiple people you use the word "IT" to address them? Another odd thing is the fact the Firefighters were made to stop all operations rather early in the day and ordered to create a collapse zone for the tower they knew hours ahead of time would magically collapse. NIST claims extraordinary events happened for the global collapse so how could they guess a collapse hours before?
AiresQX4 9 months ago
Larry Silverstein was caught on phone asking his insurance agency to authorise a controlled demolition. This was reported by Jeffrey Scott Shapiro of Fox News on April 22, 2010.
watch?v=2w-G_Ru-x2M
matPolaschek 11 months ago
@12Weasel
ahh no point in arguing with you since your eyes don't see further than your screen. I wonder to how many people you say these thing in your real life. I guess non since you have no life beyond internet and TV.
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
@12Weasel You must keep in mind that media is controlled by government so they put on the new and the shows only what they want. A lot of other opinions are not even heard because they don't come out. At the and, those who will want to know more will find out what is really happening. I respect your opinion and i have nothing against you but you should respect others opinions also and don't insult them. Have a nice time, Peace!
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
Barry Jennings told of us about the explosions that went off while he was inside WTC7, just prior to the first "plane crash". If you can't tell a controlled demolition when you see it, with a countdown and everything else,n you shouldn't be lying on you tube like a shill, about tower 7. You are too dumb or you haven't seen the footage I have seen.
iconoclast911 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?
If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?
How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?
ctcole77 1 month ago
@12Weasel There are a lot of people that explained that fire couldn't bring such a building down and that damage alone was not big enough. One guy that was evolved in building of the twin towers said that it was built so strong that it could absorb 3 planes like that and it would still not fall. Usually people that are defending the official statements are payed scientist. So why would they tell the truth? And why do you have to use such language? You're just showing your intelligence
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
@12Weasel
Well I spend a lot of my time on this subject and not only how the WTC 7 fall but how did the whole story occur and why. I will change my mind when somebody else will tell the "official" story that actually makes sense.
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
@12Weasel
I have done my study on this and I have made my own opinion. I have listened to both sides of this story and the official story just doesn't end up. And you don't need to offend me because I don't agree with your opinion.
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
@12Weasel
Sorry, my mother language is not english so it's not perfect, but anybody can see what i meant. I guess you're just looking for mistakes so you can make your stupid comments all over youtube. And I have facts very clear, apparently much more than you do. I guess you just can't handle the truth.
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
Everybody is duscussing about how the towers failed down. But why aren't people asking their self how the plains got there? Terrorists that live in the cave? Oh please, that's so stupid. And how come nobody tried to stop them? They saw it was out of the it's "right" route but they did nothing about that. They say that air-force had some problems that day and only that day! Coincidence? I don't think so.
XtrAMassivE 1 year ago
@queeniebee121 theres also hundred of fire fighters who were watching 7 before it fell. you can look up what they say about it if you want.
matchesison 1 year ago
what a load of crap if you have a 20 storey hole gouged out of one side of the building that becomes the weakest point and will stress every steel column or member on THAT same side of the structure thus overloading and load shifting IN that direction ...NOT FREE FALLING IN ITS OWN FOOT PRINT (thousands of engineers dispute this fact and will one day be vindicated )who knows maybe even wiki leaks will find that golden egg that shows the truth..fingers crossed
MrRiggersrus 1 year ago
if one side of the building was gone and the other side was fine shouldnt it fall into the direction of the damaged side??...
marcel99016 1 year ago
I love your videos!!! Sadly youtube is full of conspiracy idiots. :( But you are not alone!! I am here with you :)
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
Nice job.
MJ4ever911 1 year ago
there was explosive remains in the debris.. all 3 bldgs. Larry Silverstein collected 5.5B
thats it! nice cover up video, go get your paycheck .. Larry is a busy man .. oh and a masss murderer
joxxk 1 year ago
@joxxk really. ok lets say you could have 5.5 billion by creating all this mess. would you take that or would you continue to collect hundreds of millions of dollars a year in rent on the buildings? dont twist the truth joxx, explosive remains is way to vague a statement here and it does no credit to the people who died that day. instead, try this, "chemical elements were found at the site which were consistant with whats found in some explosives." be truthful.
matchesison 1 year ago
I will give the fat moron one benefit of the doubt. It you look at the distribution of debris from the plane that hit the south tower, components were found beyond WTC7 and the Post Office. WTC7 may have received damage that began fires before WTC1 collapsed. Such as the 7 foot long titanium shaft at the heart of those GE or Rolls Royce engines, spinning at over 10k RPM, which certainly exited the north face of WTC2, going full tilt boogie. But primary cause of destruction was debris from WTC1.
HavocGunStar 1 year ago
I get a real kick out of the hoaxers assumption that a buildings lease holder actually has the power to order a building to be illegally and dangerously demolished. Can you imagine if you were given that order? By the "lease holder"? Would you obey it? How stupid are they and how stupid do they think everyone else is?
whathoney73 1 year ago
thousands of scientist have found Nano thermite in the towers. Larry Silverstein even said they had to "pull it". Because it was damaged on the inside. I'm pretty sure to pull a tower it would take time in advance to set up the explosives"nano thermite".
gekko101 1 year ago
Bullshit
lute760 1 year ago
@ramr23 Special Ed class lately?
dubified89 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
video DOT google DOT ca/googleplayer DOT swf?doc id=-8286945740099678754&autoplay=1
Find out where money comes from. And how fraudulent it is.
hgkjggjhgjhg 1 year ago
Say what you want, argue about extent of damage and fire involvement, but common sense says you do not have a symmetrical collapse with random fires burning at random intensities and asymmetrical damage. Furthermore, it just does not make sense that buildings 3,4,5 and 6 are standing the next day when it can be argued that building 7 was farther from a tower than any of the rest.
lizardfirefighter110 1 year ago
You are completely twisting the Barry Jennings interview in this video. If you actually watched and understood his testimony, you wouldnt keep stopping the tape and asking questions. Ive watched some of your other videos regarding tower 7s collapse and again you ignore crucial information out there, and even suggest 7 didnt fall into its own footprint. YOUR OWN picture proves it does. THIS GUY IS NOT A GOOD SOURCE FOR 9/11 TRUTH
allowmetointroducems 1 year ago
@allowmetointroducems He takes things and exaggerates things. Like oh technically it didn't fall in it's own footprint because it was actually half an inch away from it so the claim that it fell into it's footprint is completely unfounded.
dubified89 1 year ago
If the WC7 building had collapsed because of some damage to it's face, it would not have fallen straight down like it did. All four corners came striaght down, like they were cut.
mcnowski 1 year ago
It been 10 year, move on faggots. This terrorist attack did not even had the most victims. It was average at most.
newtubetubetube 1 year ago
@newtubetubetube Don't worry about the movment, go back to bed.
mcnowski 1 year ago
@newtubetubetube I guess once we 'move on' the government will end all the wars that they still use 9/11 to justify then, like the one in Afghanistan? Or maybe I could blow up your fucking home with you in it and we'll see how 'average' your dead ass finds it
dubified89 1 year ago
@dubified89 Yes, move on. All you guys do is crying and crying. None of you had the courage to disband this government of liar and murderer when it was time. It been 10 fucking years, none of them will be brought to justice ever. You lost you chance, you cried for years on youtube instead of acting.
And btw, if you ever threat again to blow my house i will report you to the cyber police.
newtubetubetube 1 year ago
@newtubetubetube how bout your car
derpotni3riots 1 year ago
i think 9/11 attack ....was the support of the USA toward israel ex( using the veto agains the Arab & Muslim world-weapons-taxe money many other help etc etc + because Israel is above the law !!
abercrombiecgn1 1 year ago
You should remove this video. NIST themselves have debunked your claim that WTC 7 was so seriously damaged that it helped with the collapse of the building. NIST claims that fire alone was the only main cause for the collapse of WTC 7. You fail.
TheStroomis 1 year ago 2
Why wasn't building 7 mentioned in the 9/11 commission report ?. Even the NIST's investigation is flawed. The Report does not explain why or how the buildings totally collapsed, or explain the demolition like features of the collapses, such as their explosiveness, pulverization. NIST simply avoids these issues by claiming that global collapse was inevitable ? Many people in the buildings said that they heard or felt explosions. Just like Barry Jennings a witness that was bumped off by the NWO.
giptonsilly 1 year ago
@giptonsilly you are referring to an old report. Recheck. Just 2 days ago I watched a TV programm on phoenix (Germany's major news station, I live here) were the collapse of WTC7 was discussed. NIST was mentioned too in a thorough computer model analysis. You may have to recheck your facts.
MWcrazyhorse 1 year ago
@MWcrazyhorse The trouble here as the government is so corrupt I really can't trust a third party to lie to the world for there own agenda. What I really want to see is a proper discussion broadcast live on TV with structual engineers, and people who know what they are talking about and not a bunch of know it all morons like on here.
giptonsilly 1 year ago
They would obviously not have to worry about trying to trick people on 9-11 the whole world would had to be tricked if these things were controlled demolitions which they were.
Quintos 1 year ago
The fact that explosives were going well before the building collapsed does not prove that it was not a controlled demolition what this video is doing is, it is failing to take the timing of the explosions in the context of the event. In other words if it was a demolition it would likely not have been a standard one because it would be attempted to fit the context of the event. IE Air planes and the towers collapsing brought it down. If it was a standard demolition it would all be done at once.
Quintos 1 year ago
Well everyone makes mistakes that does not prove that what he is saying is untrue just because mabey he got the order wrong on the crash of WTC and he was inside the lobby which is not viewable from out side. You would have to be in the lobby to tell duh! Why did 2nd building hit come down first instead of the 1st one that got hit the 1st one was burning longer.
Quintos 1 year ago
So WTC fell over 300 feet to the side...Very very interesting!
TheoriginalGrumphy 1 year ago
I don't understand why the people of New York City are making such a "civilized" fuss over this proposed mosque. Were the people on those two planes, and in those two towers, slaughtered peacefully? If you don't want the mosque built near ground zero, just slaughter a few pigs on the property, bleed them out good, and leave some guts on the property. This should desecrate the property for Muslims, forever. Desecrate it with pigs' blood.
StephenB58 1 year ago
i am still not convince that WTC7 fell in that manner because of the big debris from the other tower. i am not bias but so far the so called conspiracy theorist convince me more that it was an inside job. but i'm open to any evidence saying it otherwise. hook me.
kenteles 1 year ago
@kenteles -NY TIMES 12/20/2001 City Had Been Warned of Fuel Tank at 7 World Trade Center
"Fire Department officials warned the city and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey in 1998 and 1999 that a giant diesel fuel tank for the mayor's $13 million command bunker in 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story high-rise that burned and collapsed on Sept. 11, posed a hazard and was not consistent with city fire codes.
58ravenfan 1 year ago
@kenteles --The 6,000-gallon tank was positioned about 15 feet above the ground floor and near several lobby elevators and was meant to fuel generators that would supply electricity to the 23rd-floor bunker in the event of a power failure.
58ravenfan 1 year ago
@kenteles --Although the city made some design changes to address the concerns - moving a fuel pipe that would have run from the tank up an elevator shaft, for example - it left the tank in place. But the Fire Department repeatedly warned that a tank in that position could spread fumes throughout the building if it leaked, or, if it caught fire, could produce what one Fire Department memorandum called "disaster."
58ravenfan 1 year ago
@kenteles - therefor the explosions that you see is the tank exploding and the pipes that are connected to it going up the elevator shafts. that explosion was cased by the fire igniting the tank. the explosion plus the structural damage to the building already caused by the falling debris was the cause of the callapse. as you can see in the video the explosions only happend on ONE side. tell me this "truthers", how can you have a "controled demolition" while useing explosives to ONLY ONE SIDE?
58ravenfan 1 year ago
If you showed the collapse of WTC7 to people who didn't know or recognize it was part of 9/11 they would instantly think CD, because it looks like CD. Instantaneous total structural failure collapsing at free fall. No other high rise steel framed structure had ever collapsed in this manner from fire before 9/11 nor has any since. If there had been a real investigation of the collapse the structural steel would have been examined to determine how and why it happened. But we're still waiting.
AlNouveau 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was not an inside job, and anyone who says so needs to seek serious medical help.
illusionistdave 1 year ago
wow this guy is a cafateria researcher. because barry misspoke about which building fell this guy disqualifies him but when he says something that helps his argument then barry is a qualified witness again. debunk this RP. how was there molten metal found at wtc 1,2,and 7.
robinsl27 1 year ago
@representativepress Are you unaware that 9/11 was an inside job, that the 3 WTC skyscrapers were demolished with highly energetic material like thermitic material?!?
You seem to be on target on everything else, so this really disturbs me. All academics i showed the WTC7 freefall collapse footage at least agreed that it was highly suspicious.
Loose change was the earliest documentary to expose the controlled demolition of the WTC and the overall inside job.
Kudos to the Loose Change crew!
KnastPlanet 1 year ago
@KnastPlanet "Loose Change" is a FICTIONAL movie...Hear it from Dylan himself. Pay close attention to what he says in the 1st 55 seconds. watch?v=3ZjJQWNQZog
gimme2utah1 1 year ago
Bullshit! Dr. Alan Sabrosky Jewish American Top Marine former Director of US War College says the evidence is overwhelming that Israel did 911 just like they did the USS Liberty and JFK!!!
elucidative 1 year ago
@elucidative That's complete BS. There is absolutely no evidence of Jewish involvement in this. So weak to blame the Jews. Typical racist stupid crap.
USAneedsaChange 1 year ago
@USAneedsaChange LOL being called a racist after mentioning a internationally well known event like when the unmarked Israeli jets attacked the USS Liberty in a false flag attack to provoke a war with Egypt. They couldn't sink her so then they had Israeli ships torpedo and napalm the USS Liberty but God held it afloat. Then the criminal LBJ tried to cover it up but the other nations knew what happened. Just knowing history is now racist. 90% of the racism wailers are Khazars not Semitic.
elucidative 1 year ago
bullshit
they did happen
waterchildtera 1 year ago
so the south side of the building was totaly gone, damaged, engulfed in flames yet this massive structure came down perfectly straight? Yeah right, at least the twins had holes in them and they didn't fall from the bottom up. 9/11 stinks in the worst way. One day the truth will be exposed.
Jrm4cam 1 year ago
That "Mysterious deaths of 9-11 eyewitnesses" video is crap. It includes Barry Jennings, who had nothing but contempt for the truth movement. He was not a truther and you should look into how the truth movment has twisted his initial statement after walked out of WTC 7.
dreadnaught2 1 year ago
stupid america you are confused
matlabatt78 1 year ago
It's OK Diskpanic, we know who you are. When the dust settles you'll get a nice room with padded walls and a little, black and white TV with three square meals passed to you thru the slot.
It'll be a nice life, far from the reality of the real world. This little fantasy that you've created will eventually dissipate,, hopefully.
beneehall 2 years ago
Okay, that's just plain ridiculous!
It's obvious that Barry Jennings is saying that first one tower fell, then the next. He is not saying first the north tower (tower 1) collasped, then the south (tower 2).
At 2:30 you're talking about an explosion when WTC 1 hit building 7. Ummm...the impact of WTC 1 into WTC 7 would be just that, an impact & not an explosion.
So, what the hell are YOU talking about?
jelinto 2 years ago
Yes the person who made this video is a really bad dis info agent. Who am I going to believe; the guy who was inside WTC 7( who mysteriously disappeared and missed his appearance at the 911 commission) or the Representive Press. Easy answer
thementalpatient2005 2 years ago
@thementalpatient2005
I don't think representativepress is a disinfo agent. I just know he's wrong. that's all. He still hasn't figured 9/11 out yet or chooses not make it known that he has because he thinks he'll lose subscribers if he changes his position, which is probably true. Alot of 9/11 debunker types do subscribe to his channel. He does deserve credit for speaking out against zionism. Zionism, which is not to be confused with anti-semitism. Fuck that game they like to play!
jelinto 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey diskpanic,
Hey diskpanic,
How about the above video? Are you blind?
If you can watch the collapse of the the WTC towers and pretend to not see massive explosions hurling tons of steel and vaporized concrete upwards of 500 feet, then you are blind, stupid, or a paid sock-puppet troll.
dbetsa 2 years ago
Hey diskpanic,
If you can watch the collapse of the the WTC towers and pretend to not see massive explosions hurling tons of steel and vaporized concrete upwards of 500 feet, then you are blind, stupid, or a paid sock-puppet troll.
dbetsa 2 years ago
@debetsa
LOL! Yes, explosions that are silent and have no fiery effects or black smoke. Totally believable. Yeah... stealth explosives.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@dbetsa, Ignore the disinfo-idiots.
TrutherD1 2 years ago
diskpanic AGAIN. What waste of time
TrutherD1 2 years ago
Odd isn't it that the arguments in this video, doesn't include one single version of the actual collapse as captured by four networks.
Could it be that the arguments would fall flat if we saw that building 7 fell exactly as if it was one of those controlled demolitions you see on various documentaries. Pretty much straight down.
It appears that at least one side of the building was intact, no fire, no damage. In that case, the building should have just toppled over.
hopeso 2 years ago
@hopeso
LMAO. You're an expert, right? Tell us, please, Truther nutjob, exactly how much Force is required to make a 200,000 ton mass move sideways?
diskpanic 2 years ago
Oklahoma City bombing: that building was hit pretty freakin hard and it stood strong afterward......
RustyM74 2 years ago
Hey diskpanic
There is amble evidence to prove the following.
1. free fall collapse
2. massive explosions
3. thermite residue
Your refusal to concede these well established, and easily observable, facts proves your maliciousness and obstruction of justice regarding the crimes of 911. Treason is punishable by death. Would you testify under oath? Swear on the Bible? Commit perjury? Look in the mirror, you can be something other than what you see at this time
dbetsa 2 years ago
@dbetsa
1) Free Fall collapse of what?
watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4
2) Massive explosions? Do you even know what an explosion looks like? You mean "massive explosions" like these? (Turn up your speakers to max, so you can hear them clearly.)
watch?v=3BgBc3alUd4
3) Thermite residue?
Did you know that there is no such thing as an incomplete thermite reaction? There is no such thing as thermite residue? Did you know that Jones, Harrit, etal have yet to submit their work to peer review? Why is that?
diskpanic 2 years ago
Hey diskpanic,
Your refusal to concede the massive explosions that are easily observable in the video and audio records is evidence that you are not sincere regarding what happened on 911.
You are a disgrace to humanity for using your intelligence in this way. In particular, You are an insult to thousands of people who have suffered under the ongoing fraud of 911
dbetsa 2 years ago
@dbetsa
You are an idiot Truther. By the way, nutbar.
Did you know that 4.4% of Americans suffer from PPD or PS? You are probably one of those people. Have you ever sought psychological help for your paranoia? They make anti-anxiety pills for people EXACTLY like you.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@dbetsa
You are an idiot, dude.
STATE YOUR CREDENTIALS! Oops. You have none. I doubt you even have an undergrad degree.
What explosions? Explosions make noise. Explosions are unmistakably loud. You can't HIDE explosions. See, you don't even know what an explosion is or what it does to matter, do you?
If you do, please, for the benefit of the 95.5% of Americans that don't belong to the 9/11 Truther CULT, explain to us what an explosion actually IS.
diskpanic 2 years ago
they all knew it was going to collapse, they cleared the area pretty successfully, i would hope. i saw them implode a stadium in indiana, from afar didnt hear too much, except for the rumble of the imploding structure.....
RustyM74 2 years ago
@dbetsa
You are a douchebag. Not only are you totally ignorant of physics, physical sciences, and logic and reason, you present ZERO POSITIVE EVIDENCE for your accusation.
YOU, as the ACCUSER, are REQUIRED to present EVIDENCE! Without evidence, you are just making accusations. Accusations without EVIDENCE is lying. Present evidence or shut the hell up.
diskpanic 2 years ago
Another comment as well...up until 9/11, no steel structure EVER had collapsed before. Now we suddenly have fireman that are expert engineers and can assess the structural integrity of a building. The only reason they believed it could collapse was what had happened to the twin towers.
jgalket 2 years ago
What I find most interesting about all this is:
1) You have no video of the building from the south side. The pictures have a large mass of the tower leaning against it, but no true damage has been done to the 7th tower.
2. Interestingly, Oaklahoma City is mentioned. If you remember, ALMOST HALF of this building was obliterated, yet it DID NOT FALL. It had to be brought down with timed detonations.
jgalket 2 years ago
@jgalket
Are you serious? You do realize that there are other places you can see videos on YouTube, nutjob. If you actually cared about "the truth" (you don't, admit it), you would have actually taken the 30 seconds it would take to search YouTube for "WTC7 South Side". Seriously, you nutjobs are the laziest bunch of faux intellectuals I've ever come across.
diskpanic 2 years ago
Don't waste your time debating diskpanic. He is possibly a paid troll.
muzicmaker2001 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@muzicmaker2001
LMAO! Yes, nutjob. You caught me. I'm a paid agent by the NWO. We're sending someone to kill you tonight. I have dibbies on your sister.
diskpanic 2 years ago
Who in their right mind would pay anyone to troll on YouTube... Nothing written here matters at all.
DeerStop69 2 years ago
this guy is probably paid by someone like silverstein to cover up this murder of poor american citizens ..by conspirators and world money tycoons and businessman to get the oil from m.east.
futuramark 2 years ago
LoL! So only the diehard, truly idiot F-Troofers are still around! Why not just get over it, and get a life already, eh?
Exmech2 2 years ago
what should we get over exactly,,,,,,,,you ignarant fuckstick exmech2,,,,,,,,,,should we get over the deceptions and the lies,,,,,,,,,,,should we get over the carnage and murder,,,,,,,,,should we get over the troops dying in a bogus war,,,,,,,,,,should we get over the established elite marking our lives as meaningless,,,,,,,,should we get over their arrogance and evil agenda,,,,,,,,,should we get over the taking of our rights and civil liberties,,,,,,,or get over the one world government agenda
bigbopper993 2 years ago
Wow! So filled with bile, ignorance, and paranoia. Take yer meds.
lrn2reason
Exmech2 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
I know that doing honest research is difficult. I know this because I've had to do hard research when I worked on my Masters degree. What I don't understand, however, is why you people call yourselves "Truthers" and say you are so interested in the "Truth", yet you do nothing in order to find it.
watch?v=LRkQ7Tr9Q3o
This video CLEARLY shows that WTC7 leaned to the south during its collapse. Nuff said. You're a nutjob.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@diskpanic if you believe that this building came down from natural causes,,,,,,,,you may as well wipe your ass with your masters degree,,,,,,,because you are unable to use any annalytical thin king skills,,,,,,,,,if there was this catastrophic damage to the south side,,,,,,the building would have fell very drastically to that side my friend,,,,,how did the undamaged side fall symetrically with the south side,,,,,,,wake up masters,,,,,,,i piss on you because you are in the way of the truth
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
Lay off the sauce, Truther. Did you even look at the video I posted? No, of course not, you drunken, Truther nutjob. You are obviously an uneducated peasant of the first order. The COMMA is NOT A TOY, you ignorant sack of feces.
You're the sort of sack of crap that believes the tower came down in 7 seconds, because the video on some TRUTHER MYTHOLOGY website shows it collapsing in 7 seconds. You have never looked at the full footage, have you?
diskpanic 2 years ago
@diskpanic I have looked at everything my friend,,,,,,,,over and over,,,,,,,thousands of times,,,,,,,,and no one will ever make me believe that a building can fall the way it did,,,,,,,,,without some major help,,,,,,,,so if you actually believe this happened as advertised,,,,,,,,why don't they just hit the lobby of a building in vegas,,,,,,,,,,then start a few fires,,,,,,,,,and wait till the afternoon for the building to fall in it's own footprint neatly,,,,,,,,,no need for anymore demo industry
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
Ah, there it is! "no one will ever make me believe...", no, of course not, Truther nutjob. No one can EVER convince you otherwise. It's impossible. Not because of your conviction in the facts, but because of your paranoid delusion requires you to buy whatever Alex Jones is selling you. If GOD HIMSELF, in all of His Glory, came down from heaven and TOLD YOU that this was perpetrated by radical Islamic terrorists, you'd deny even Him, because NO ONE can convince you otherwise.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@diskpanic there you go making assumptions again diskpanic,,,,,,,,,,,i was firmly in belief of the official story until early 2004 my friend,,,,,,,,,then i actually took the time to look into some major issues,,,,,,,,,contadicting eyewitness reports,,,,,,major media blackout,,,,,,,,,,having an insider like phillip zelikow lead the investigation,,,,,,,,,,the total slap in the face to the american people was the comission report,,,,,it strangely did not make mention of building seven,,,,,farce!!!
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
I can tell just from your haphazard use of the English language that you are NOT, by any means, an educated man. You wouldn't know the first thing whether or not a building falling down was normal or not. You have ZERO expertise in the matter. All that matters to you is that Alex Jones and people like him with questionable credentials TELL YOU what to believe, and you just accept it. Why? Because it fits your paranoid delusion. Take your pills, nutjob.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@diskpanic this is not english class diskpanic,,,,,,,,,,i can right however i feel,,,,,,,,,,and i will debate circles around you any fucking daymy friend,,,,,,twice on sunday,,,,,,,,,alex jones has had very little to do with my research buddy,,,,,,,,i applaud him for his work and effort,,,,,,but i have been digging deeper than most people can wrap their feeble little minds around,,,,,,,,including you,,,,,,jim fetzner,,,,morgan reynolds,,,,judy wood,,,,these are the experts asking real questions
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
Exactly, Truther nutjob, you may "right" whatever you "feel". Lord knows, you Truthers don't THINK about things the way 88% of people do. Nor are you Truthers generally as educated, as you are a prime example of. Thank you for name dropping, by the way, for it has exposed you for an intellectual abscess (as if your butchering of grammar wasn't a huge clue). For those that don't know, Judy Wood suggested that an orbital energy weapon took down the Twin Towers. You agree with her?
diskpanic 2 years ago
@diskpanic I AGREE THAT IT WAS NOT A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF DEMOLITION LIKE BUILDING SEVEN,,,,,,THE TOWERS WERE ACTUALLY BLOWN ALMOST ENTIRELEY INTO DUST,,,,,,,,NO DOORKNOBS,,,NO CHAIRS,,,,,NO TELEPHONES,,,,,NO COMPUTERS,,,,NO CONCRETE,,,,,JUST A THICK BLANKET OF DUST COVERING MANHATTEN ,,,,,AND SOME STEEL,,,,,,,THE DEBRIS PILE WAS 3 STORIES HIGH,,,,THE REST WAS A MILE OF DUST,,,,,IT TAKES AN OBSCENE AMOUNT OF ENERGY TO DO THIS,,,,,,FLIPPED AND TOASTED CARS FOR A MILE,,,,,MASSIVE ENERGY RELEASE
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@diskpanic THIS WAS A COVERT OPERATION,,,,,,,,AND THE MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES ARE ABOUT 30 YEARS AHEAD OF ANYTHING WE HAVE EVER SEEN,,,,,,,,COVERT MEANS TO APPEAR AS SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT,,,,,,,NOW DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THE MILITARY STANDS BY AND LETS HIGHLY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES GO TO WASTE,,,,,,THE FAKE PLANES WERE USED,,,,TO MAKE US BELIEVE THE PANCAKE WAS POSSIBLE,,,,,,,,BUT COVERTLY THERE WERE SOME HIGHLY ADVANCED WEAPONRY AT WORK HERE,,,,,,COVERTNESS,,,,,LIKE PULLING RABBIT FROM HAT
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
LMAO! So you do buy into her crap. Ladies and gentlemen of the rational public. I rest my case. Here we have yet another Truther raving that the towers were brought down by ray guns from outer space. These lunatics think that it makes more sense that a giant raygun in outer space destroyed the tower than the inexorable pull of gravity which kills how many thousands of people a year from avalanches, jumping off of buildings, to structure collapses?
Truthers: Education optional.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
For more information about the nutjobs that this particular Truther idiot name dropped, please see:
watch?v=T6fe9YlHQwA
You'll learn all about these idiots, how they have ZERO credentials, how they are prima facie insane, and how they are obviously in it for the money, not the "truth".
diskpanic 2 years ago
@diskpanic YOU HAVE A HARD TIME STICKING WITH THE FACTS DON'T,,,,,,,YOU FUCKING WASTE OF SPACE,,,,,,,,THE FACT IS THESE MASSIVE BUILDINGS,,,,,,,AMONG THE STRONGEST BUILT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR WORLD,,,,,,,,,SOMEHOW WERE RUDUCED TO EXTREMELY FINE DUST,,,,,,,,,HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THAT YOU OFFICIAL TREE HUGGER,,,,,,,,GRAVITY WILL BREAK CONCRETE AND OFFICE CONTENT INTO PIECES,,,,,,,BUT DOES NOT HAVE THE NECESSARY ENERGY TO TURN THEM INTO FINE DUST,,,,,,,ALL OF MANHATTON IS COATED WITH DUST YOU FUCK!!
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@diskpanic ZERO CREDENTIALS,,,,,,,A DOCTOR OF SCIENCE,,,,,,,A PROFESSOR,,,,,,,,AND A FORMER BUSH INSIDER,,,,,,,,THESE PEOPLE ARE KOOKS WITH NO CREDENTIALS,,,,,,,,YOU MAY BE THE MOST IGNORANT,,,,,,,,DUMMEST ,,,,,,,,MOST IRRATIONAL,,,,,,,,,AND DELUSION,,,,,,,,FUCKING RETARD I EVER MET,,,,,,,,,,DID I NOT TELL YOU TO GO SLIT YOUR THROAT IN THE MIRROR,,,,,,,SO YOU CAN WATCH YOURSELF DIE,,,,,,,,,,NO WAIT USE MY MIRROR,,,,,,,,,THEN I WILL PISS IN YOUR OPEN NECK WOUND,,,,,,,,AS I CACKLE WITH JOY!!!!
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
LOL Since it's obvious that you don't know, there are a lot of different branches of "science". See, you can't get a degree in, say, Physics, and be able to speak any more authoritatively about Chemistry than, say, a Sophomore in college. That's the thing you nutjobs just don't get. You are so easily impressed by all those fancy letters at the end of someone's name (except, of course, when the person doesn't agree with your brand of stupidity).
diskpanic 2 years ago
diskpanic
Thedman,
Please watch one of the WTC collapse videos. If you do not see massive explosions then you are either blind, dumb, or disingenuous. If you refuse to acknowledge free fall then you are simply an asshole, a traitor, and a humiliation to the human race. Treason is punishible by death. Use your intelligence for the good. God never sleeps.
dbetsa 2 years ago
@dbetsa
Please watch videos of ACTUAL collapses. If you fail to notice that:
1) explosions cause extremely loud and audible noise
2) explosions generate enough force to rattle windows and shake people
3) explosions cause VISIBLE bursts of flame and clouds of black smoke
4) explosions do NOT cause sustained gusts of dust
5) streams of dust are caused by collapse debris, not by the explosions
then you are a Truther Cultist (which automatically makes you also an idiot). You, sir, are a fool.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@dbetsa
And since you have no idea what "free fall" is (unsurprising, because you are a Truther, and science, reason, and logic are lost on you), then please care to explain why the debris falling beside the building actually hits the ground before the tower finishes collapsing if the tower is collapsing at free fall? NOTE: Even your Truther high priests no longer assert free fall of WTC1 or WTC2.
diskpanic 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
And, as I said to one of your fellow nutjobs, you wouldn't know the Truth if it climbed into a 757 shouting "Allah Akbar!" and ran over your ignorant nutjob arse.
diskpanic 2 years ago
diskpanic,
you are going straight to hell you sock puppet bastard....
dbetsa 2 years ago
@dbetsa
Amazingly well educated response to a logical argument. I'm going straight to hell, you uneducated peasant? You wouldn't know hell if it rose out of the Pit and sodomized you before dragging you down to the great Deceiver with whom you share so much in common.
No, nutter, Jesus is my savior, and whether I go to hell or not is between me and Him. Lucky for me, nutjobs like you don't get to pick who does and who does not deserve Redemption. Have fun mumbling obscenities to yourself.
diskpanic 2 years ago
narrator: SHUT THE FUCK UP you fucking loser
SearchParty27 2 years ago 2
this video is a FUCKING DISGRACE,,,,,,,,,,OH YEAH THE ENTIRE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING IS GONE,,,,,,,,,BUT INSTEAD OF THE BUILDING FALLING TOWARDS THAT SIDE THAT HAS SUCH CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE,,,,,,,,,IT COMES NEATLY STRAIGHT DOWN,,,,,,,,,SO THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WITH NO DAMAGE FELL JUST AS FAST AS THE SIDE THAT HAD THIS SO CALLED SEVER DAMAGE,,,,,,,,HOW CAN UNDAMAGED TRUSSES FALL JUST AS FAST AS DAMAGED ONES,,,,,,,,,THIS CANNOT FUCKING HAPPEN,,,,,,,,AND WHOEVER SUPPORTS THIS GARBAGE FUCK OFF
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@bigbopper993
Actually, there is significant evidence that the building collapsed to the south.
diskpanic 2 years ago
wrong answer diskpanic,,,,,,,,,if you were a little smarter,,,,,,,,,,you would know how stupid you sound when you talk like that,,,,,,,,,,all of the photos and videos show the rubble pile of building 7 neatly laid in it's own footprint,,,,,,,,,,not even damaging buildings that are right beside it,,,,,,,,,,and barely reaching halfway across the street,,,,,,,,,,so what is your significant evidence that forty seven stories fell to the south,,,,,,,,,did larry silverstein tell you that ,,,,,,,,,,haha
bigbopper993 2 years ago
this is just a load of bollocks.
How irritating to find people who join themselves to support the press organisations. Fuck them! It's them that supported this war and medtiatised terrorism as a mean of war.
This video is a sheer fact in its self:IT says half of the building had gone... ? WHAT? WHERE? WTF are they talking about?
and then, it collapsed.
Oh, yeah it collapased nice and tidy.
2 minutes ago, only half of it was gone...
Be serious one minute, we all know something's wrong.
hingamp 2 years ago
did the murrah building ...''fall down''?
if 7 fell because of the damage on one side of the building . it naturally would fall towards the damaged weaker side .
occision 2 years ago 2
i remember news reports of the molten steel underneath the pile weeks after 9/11. i was so shocked by the news which is why i remember it vividly.
ho2cultcha 2 years ago 2
Ok Barry made a mistake like a writer making a typo. He knows the sequence, we all do, right? Think of something else.
Ok forget about that. Where is videos, pictures even, of the damage of the other side of building seven, you have everything else.
And have you ever seen a building fall like these three buildings did without some kind of control? It has never happened before. There is why too much evidence pointed at control demolition and you know it. It is only a matter of time...
LordPersuader 2 years ago 2
I can't believe you idiots are still around.
For one, everyone was in shock that day, and you schmucks seem to think someone ought, in all that chaos, shock and confusion, to think of everything.
Furthermore, you want photos of a severely damaged side of a building covered in smoke - morons.
Lastly, you seem to think your movement ("Truthers") are on a roll, and headed for a breakthrough. No, you are not. You are pretentious, troubled individuals, who have a need to feel superior. That is all
DeerStop69 2 years ago
deerstop how can you turn a blind eye to alll the evidence,,,,,,,,,people are waking up to the cold hard truth,,,,,,,,,only 24 percent of people out there believe the government story fully,,,,,,,,you are in the minority now my friend,,,,,,,,,,,and even if they never admit to their crimes ,,,,,,,,,,,at least people are educating themselves on the deception,,,,,,,,,you should too
bigbopper993 2 years ago
Far from turning a blind eye, I've been reading it. Far too much of it. I'm sad to say it's mostly all a waste of time.
On the other hand, I'm actually glad we have sceptical people spending heaps of time on such issues. Perhaps the day will come when they actually accomplish something - uncover some actual conspiracy or other act of betrayal.
I've never said I believe the entire official story (is there one?), but I discard the vast majority of what 9/11 Truthers have claimed. Too much noise.
DeerStop69 2 years ago
Is there an official story???yes there is my friend,,,,,,and it is so conviluted and contrived it makes us sick to our fucking stomach,,,,,,,it is the most ultimate bullshit i have ever fucking heard,,,,,,,,shame on anyone who has actually accepted it,,,,,,,,,,this fucking story is so full of shit it has religious people standing in awe!!! they had the biggest bullshit story of all time before the osama and 19 boxcutter story came out,,,,,,,,,what a slap in the face of all the american people!!
bigbopper993 2 years ago
@DeerStop69
The problem with most Truthers is that they are (seriously speaking here) suffering from cognitive disassociation, meaning they are literally INCAPABLE of putting things that they sense properly together with their logical antecedents, like rational people do. 4.4% of Americans suffer from paranoid personality disorder or paranoid schizophrenia. Fewer than 5% of Americans buy MIHOP Truther theories. Coincidence? I think not.
diskpanic 2 years ago
R.I.P Barry Jennings!
ManFromMelbourne 2 years ago 2
watch?v=fEu1TJzq3mE
ReprogramurMind 2 years ago
pal you have assumtion after assumption. you work for the administration. im possitive.
DINGLEtheBERRY 2 years ago
Ok what about when a plane hit the Empire state building? it didn't collapse. And there's never been a building fire that caused a building to fall down before EVER til 911. There were witnesses that survived from the twin towers that said there were explosions BEFORE the planes even hit! Also a guy from the company that inspected the twin tower's steel before it was used on the towers says that it would have to take 3000F degrees to melt non-fireproof steel.
Shikyou 2 years ago
It doesn't matter how much physical damage of fire that No7 suffered If it was going to fall it would never fall straight down.I just love this 'gouyz' cheesy NY accent.
stratocaster539 2 years ago