So Al Gore's a Nazi because he's crusading against global warming? Global warming is not a ethnic group, let alone a person you peice of shit Glenn Beck
It used to be that radio stations that used PUBLIC AIRWAYS were required by the FCC to devote equal time to opposing points of view on topics that were deemed in the PUBLIC INTEREST.If a station did not meet this requirement it would lose its license.Reagan did away with the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.Then with the help of a handful of rich individuals right wing extremism on PUBLIC airways was forced upon all.The Reagan era was the beginning of America's decline in all aspects of what once made it great
Dont worry, though. The 50% of us that make this country tick are already prepared for this inevitable collapse of the Liberal/Progessive socialist movement. We have Gold, Silver and other instruments invested abroad and we have the GUTS and the DRIVE to be INDIVIDUALS who can make it all happen so the rest of you collective idiots all have a country left when your MASSIVE government fails you.
When the average dumb liberal figures out that they have been lied to, that it is IMPOSSIBLE for government to deliver the services promised.....that it is IMPOSSIBLE for 50% of the population to carry the other 50% on their backs, that FDR was warned in 1935 that Social Security would collapse in 80 years due to the anticipated birth rates, that the Federal Reserve is Illegal, Fannie & Freddie are Illegal and that the social benefits cant be paid...they are going to riot...just like Greece
As the bankrupted Union Pension plans collapse (they will not continue because they are PONZI schemes and Pyramid schemes), as the State and Local governments go Bankrupt, as Social Security and Medicare FAIL, as 1/3 of the banks collapse due to Federal interference, this Depression will grip the United States. At that point, it will become IMPOSSIBLE for the Progressive Socialists and communists to conceal the damage they have done to this country over the past 80 years.
Why is it OK for EVERY single liberal/progressive/communist/socialist/collectivist/Democrat to call ME a racist because I don't want the Federal Government to take me down with them in their economic suicide march??
Ah! He's a prep student whos just learned the names of some Europpean thinkers, and tries to adapt 18th century ideas to today.
All you have to do is to have an ounce of patience and use some common sense.
People whom are using Fixed Noise as their sole source of information will react the same way as the Germans when they are being exposed to the lies they've been brainwashed for 12 years with Hitler: react in disbelief. I sometimes wonder if they are as disconnected to the world as DPRK
REPUBLICANS ARE A DeVIOUS BUNCH.They love the undocumented as long as they don't ask for anything & allow themselves to work dangerously for very little pay. REPUBLICANS got rich embracing & promoting DEREGULATION. They are to blame for the worst financial crisis since 1929.Currently they are blocking all debate on the subject of WALL STREET REFORM. They claimed they were for healthcare reform but they NEVER had a plan. IT'S CLEAR THEY DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT AMERICA. THEY WILL BE FINISHED.
"caucasian births are in free fall.".."demographic decline of America".."the west is in decline"...."our nation will disappear"..These words (among others) were uttered by Michael "Savage" Weiner during one segment of his radio show on 04-13-2010. They sound like words one would hear at a Klan rally.
could you be more specific than that??? this is the way it usually goes for progressive/collectivists. They either make a general statement of insult or they attack a person based on ONE thing they get wrong.....ignoring the other 90 things that were correctly stated. Please help me see the light on Glenn Beck. I've seen nearly every show he has broadcasted in the past 4 years and am an expert on both his show and his message
Glenn Beck broadcasts 20 hours of content a week, every week. There is a part of his show that is parody, comedy and satire.....and then there is the larger part of his show which is CUTTING EDGE interviews and education. So if you take the 50,000 plus hours of broadcasting and you find a few seconds of off color comedy or satire....AS IF HE HONESTLY PLANS ON KILLING SOMEONE, then you are talking about less than 1/100,000th of the material that you disagree with.
let's explore facts. Beck never called obama a racist. Beck never called obama a facscist...although facisms and communism have a great deal in common.
Beck DID call obama a Socialist....because he is. He is a Socialist of the Fabian School. Don't know what fabianism is...look it up. That's what Obama is.
Let's debate some facts....but I forgot...one has to actually KNOW some facts to debate them.
Glenn Beck is responsible for some of the most detailed explanations on the history of law and economics that has every been broadcast in the history of Television. He is the first Television show, INCLUDING EVERY MAJOR NEWS OUTLET, that has ever explored the Federal Reserve in detail, along with every aspect of the debt of the government and our banking system. Please tell me which shows you have seen with which you take objection....and he has never called obama a racist
Don't tell me you bought into Beck's Online University?
Glenn Beck said right ion the air on Fox & Friends "I believe that Obama is a racist".... "I think that Obama has a deep seeded hatred towards white folks, or white culture"...
It's funny how he tried to debunk GWBs FEMA camps, and suddenly popped up with theories as if those were Obama invetions.
He's not about information or education. He's about fearmongering and lies for profit...
Apparently you didn't watch my interview with world renowned ecnomist Robert Prechter....who is in the Triple 9 society (look it up, since you don't know what 999 society is).
Which of the Educational Glenn Beck episodes have you watched and disagree with. the ones about the Federal Reserve....
Or how about all the episodes on economics that he did 4-5 years ago.....with economists and all - on the COMING COLLAPSE......
You shouldn't allow your emotions to rule you like that. Babe Ruth Struck out more than just about any other baseball player of his time and had a number of personal struggles. Yet, he was also one of the most prolific baseball players in the history of the game. Beck's work on economics alone is some of the most groundbreaking work that has ever been done on television. He is the first TV host to have such cutting edge and in depth reporting on such a dry topic.
The basis for collaps started with GWB tax cuts for his mates, while they ran off to Bahamas while outsorucing the work force, GWB dismantled, or at least speadied up the dismantlement of Social Security, and squandering the surplus in two wars of choice.
My friend - If you were well studied in these matters you would understand that these seeds were sewn back in the 1920s and 1930s. BTW - I don't support GWB and neither does Beck. I support Ron Paul and Peter Schiff. This collapse is the result of 80+ years of Lies and corruption by a country that was taken over by socialists. Social Security, Medicare, welfare, Fannie Mae, Freddie mac. The US was lost to socialists long ago. The birth rate concealed the damage
Social Security is Unconstitutional, Medicare is Unconstitutional, the FHA and HUD are Unconstitutional, The Federal Reserve is Unconstitutional, The PAPER MONEY supply is Unconstitutional, Fannie Mae and Freddie mac are Unconsitutional, the WHOLE ENTIRETY of department of Labor is Unconstitutional, The FED dept of education is Unconstitutional, the Dept of Energy is Unconsitutional, Health care bill is Unconstitutional.
And I'm quoting Washington ;ontlhy who quoted Eisenhower
«Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance and eliminat labor laws and fram programgs, you would not hear fromthat party again in our political history».
The president ackonwledged in the letter that there are som who advocate such nonsense, but added, «Their number is negligible and they are supid.»
"Life liberty and opursuitof happiness" menas in the broadest sense of interpretation also means universal healthcare.
GOP wnat the US to go back to pre 1935 status where the likes of you would be forced out in the dimpster to find something to eat, and some scrap metal to sell.
Also; Is schools, fire dpet. Homeland Security, Bush' FEMA, waging pre emptive wars and pallying upto the military industrial complex constitutuional? Is the drug laws constitutional?
If you took the time to ACTUALLY READ what those words meant...by the study of the works written by the MEN WHO WROTE THEM, then you would understand that it means that the Government's ONLY PURPOSE is to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY, LIFE and LIBERTY. In 1935 the US was the WEATHIEST nation in the history of the world. We are now the largest DEBTOR nation in the world.
You need to read. READ READ READ.
Drug laws are unconstitutional as well as the pre-emptive wars
I see you are cutting and pasting parts of the Bill of Rights to make it fit into your talking points.
And what is "LIFE" without access to healthcare?
I am a vet from Bosnia '93. I have had symptoms of PSTD on and off for 16 years.
As I live in England these days, I have a UK SS number, and pay my NIS each month. When I need a doctor, I get an appt almost immedialtely, and I don't get charged a dime. How much does it cost for an uninsured to get a docs apt in USA?
What is life without access to food, shelter, clothing, education, a house......
Access to healthcare, food, shelter, clothing, transportation....these are called "GOODS AND SERVICES." In a FREE country....you know, the type without dictators...YOU WORK, MAKE MONEY and you BUY GOODS and SERVICES.
Rights are INTANGIBLE CONCEPTS THAT COME DIRECTLY TO THE INDIVIDUAL FROM GOD.....Not from another man. Government is instituted to Protect these god given rights..
Govt can't give rights to any person. That's why the Declaration of Independence so specifically states this. Government is instituted to protect private property rights, to protect one's physical body from being DIRECTLY assaulted by another person, and to protect your liberties from being directly assaulted by any person or group of people. The Federal Government was given only 17 very limited and specific powers. That's a republic. WE now live in a socialist state
Look up socialism and get educated before starting to talk about things you have no clue about. It makes you look less silly. If any socialism, Bush introduced "socialism" for the rich. Fact is that USA is far closer to Fascism than socialism.
Your liberties? Got sold out when Bush and his gangsters swiped them away by introducing that Patriot Act.
I hate the fact that I can't bring a bottle of Whisky through security anymore at airports.
There are about 20 forms of socialism. I'm well read on the subject matter. Call it Collectivism if you prefer....or Fabianism. Both parties are socialist already. Social Security, medicare, health care bill.......all of it is socialism. I am always amused that you progressives think that anyone who is AGAINST your marxist doctines are FOR the Republicans. There is a third way, which is defined by Jefferson. I agree with you on Bush....hated the PATRIOT ACT.
You're acting like you were still living in the 1700s with all these "freedoms & liberties" shit.
What about the freedoms and liberties to have access to affordable healthcare?
Or being free to have a bong hit without having to worry about being dragged in like some common criminal?
If you rather want your tax dollars being spent on tax cuts for the rich, Wall Street bailouts with no oversight, illegal wars, and warrantless wiretapping than healthcare for all,
Truths are not affected by time. Newton's concepts of motion and law from the 1600s are every bit as effective today as they were then. John Locke is considered among the THREE GREATEST MINDS TO EVER BE PRODUCED BY THE WORLD, according to Jefferson.
If you took the time to read the book, Two Treatises on Government, which our entire system of law is predicated upon, you would understand what I am trying to teach you. No government has the right to directly tax a person
So a tax cut for the rich is actually just a correction of an IMMORAL and ILLEGAL theft of private property from one group of people. The Constitution FORBID taxing any person directly, unless there was a census and each person in the country paid the same exact amount of money....not even the same percentage....but the same FLAT dolllar amount. Taxing Labour is immoral and breeds the type of corruption that we see today.
I barely support a single word Bush ever said. He was bad, Obama is ten times worse. No.....I prefer that the FEDZILLA be put back into it's constitutional cage. There are 17 SPECIFIC & LIMITED enumerated powers that were delegated to the Federal Government in our Constitution. We need to cut everything and anything that isn't included in that list. From there, we can pass constitutional amendments for the things we wish to keep. That requires 75% of us on board.
Don't lie! In October 2001, he got well over 80% approval ratings. And don't come to me and tell me that you were the rational minority whom knew that Bush was full of it. I bet you voted for Bush twice! And listen to Sean Hannity, and think you have an ounce of knowledge about the constitution. And now you are all wind up because someone is taking your MSM outlets down. Rachel Maddow is a true journalist with integrity and humor. Your media outlets are obviousl Fox, and some ancient manifesto.
I did vote for Bush twice...the LESSER of TWO Evils.
Now I am for a THIRD PARTY. I realize the error of my ways....unlike you.
I debate Sean Hannity intensely....three times. One was a 17 minute intense debate about TRUE principles of LIBERTY. Maddow is a fool. She doesn't know anything. Anyone who listens to her is a dumbASS. She is perhaps one of the dumbest women I have ever heard. She knows nothing about history, law, economics or the Constitution
I support people like Tom Woods, Peter Schiff and Judge Andrew Napolitano. I am of the Jefferson and Locke school...The Austrian school.
Since you don't know who F.A. Hayeck is...I'm from that school.
You don't know anything other than "POP" Politics....people who are famous from TV. That's why your debate is TWO dimentional. You have no real knowledge of Economics or the history of law and government. You haven't read the major works
You are against the American people, thinking that things haven't changed since the days when the Iroquis skalped you forefathers (if your ties to America goes that far)....
My grandfather was born in italy. I am for TRUTH. The truth is that Natural Law has been well explained by the GREATEST MINDS TO EVER LIVE. There is nothing more to say on the matter.
Should we listen to an intellectual midget and liar like Barrack Obama or should we listen to John Locke???
Hmmmmmm......
Rachel Maddow or Thomas Jefferson... Hmmmm
No...There's a reason that Jefferson called Locke the greatest philosophical mind in the history of the world. READ IT!!!
Ah, so you nothing more than a descendant of some filthy gold digging immigrants, eh
You are obviously a drone whom are making pathetic attempts to use Thomas Jefferson for you cause. Thomas Jefferson and Rachel Maddow! Talk about the little engine that could, make hillariously stupid comparrisons.
It's also obvious that you are using Glenn Beck as source of information.
Truth? You wouldn't know what the truth was if it hit you on the head.
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness doesn't mean whatever any one person or any group of people want it to mean. It actually isn't meant in YOUR "broadest sense." It means what the author, Jefferson, defines it as. That definition is as described in the Bible. All men report directly to God and not to each other or a government. Government is institued to protect our lives (from murder), our liberty (to do as we see fit) and our property.
Jefferson's original text stated Life, Liberty and PROPERTY.
They changed the world property to the Pursuit of happiness, which was defined as each man's GOD given right to do whatever he wants, to dispose of his life and his property as he sees fit, without the consent of any other man or government.....so long as it does not DIRECTLY harm another person's life or property.
2008 is the warm-up act. EVERY move the Bush made was wrong..Oama is Bush on Steroids. You are being lied to, played like a Fiddle. If I can only get ONE point through all of you uneducated ppl it would be this: MATH DOESN'T lie. It is mathematically impossible for the financial promises to be kept. Period. The US IS ALREADY A SOCIALIST NATION. Socialism ALWAYS leads to bankrupcy. PERIOD. Read Adam Smith, "The Wealth Of Nations" "The Invisible Hand."
The US is not a socialist country. It's a country run by corporate interests. US fascism is not about Hitloresque black shirts and "Fahne Hoch". It comes in the form of a CEO, with the help of a media outlet to make you go against your own interest. He's using new speech, and you take the bait.It the US was a socialist country, you would be avble to get a doctors appoiintment on Monday without getting your wallet raped...
No, my friend....It's Socialist with a tint of Communism and a dash of Facsism.
Many people go to the grocery store, the doctors office and collect checks from the government daily. Hell, there's probably as many people on the government dole as there are taxpayers.
I'd suggest that you read a few books on economics. Like many Americans, you are ignorant of the meaning of these words.
Sorry! I think you should open a book of socialism, communism and fascism. What you have today is far closer to fascism today with the Bush policies that is still being imposed than any Europpean social democratic government today.
Churchill when he was younger, he stood behind both social security as well as a publigc healthcare system. Would you put Chruchill in the same sauce pan as Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Pol Pot?
You have limited resources, and you cannot wage war forever. It will be your downfall. Specially if your GOP continue to screw over the voters, and giving their mates more tax cuts at the expence of important things.
How about actually start following the Constitution and follow common economical sense?
End the war on drugs
End your empire ambitions
End the tax cuts for the ones whos got too much already.
End the Corporate dominion
End the tax exemptions for churches who meddle in politics
You have limited resources, & cannot wage war forever. It will be your downfall. Specially if your GOP continue to screw over the voters, and giving their mates more tax cuts at the expence of important things.Instead of putting your Europpean allies down as "commie dummies" you should have some humble pie, & learn something. Healthcare is a universal right no matter how you try to spin it, and shouldn't come up for a popular vote. It's like having a referendum on slavery in Mississippi in 1859
If Obama ws Bush with steroid, he would have rammed through Åublic Healthcare within months, and prosecuted the Bush Crime family after an intense investigation where all the diry secrets would come out (including the Wikilieaks).
Obviously math is something that GOP & Boehner doesnæt like very much. Specially when it comes to their defense of the continuation of tax cuts for the rich.
First of all, taxing the "rich" isn't something that needs defended. No group of people has a right to STEAL money from another group of people. Don't be such a dumb communist. Let me ask you a question...
What is the definition of a "Rich" Person.
Second question:
Who was empowered by the Gods to determine what that definition is???
This has nothing to do with the GOP and everything to do with Communism
Bush was a freedom crushing big government politician and Obama is even worse.
Public healthcare isn't something that is afforded to our Government by the US Constitution. Therefore, it would require a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT to bring a change like this about. That would never happen because only 20% of the population support it. You need 75% of the States to support a Constitutional Amendment.
Even if a public healthcare bill is not afforded word for word by your consitution, it's not unconstitutional either. Remember the 1st amendment? It says life, liberty & pursuit of happiness. Now how can you achieve this if your health is poor, your poor and you have no access to affordable healthcare system?
Your statistics are dubious to say the least. What FOX News talking points forgot to mention when they claimed that the majority of the people is against the bill, is that at least 15% thought is wasn't proggressive enough. And the a Fox viewer have a tendency to overlook that.
Even though I'm not American, but have spent many a summer there, as well as taking part of my education there, I see the flaws of your present healthcare system. There's a reason why USA numbers 37 on the world ranking
right arround Costa Rica and Cuba. The only reason why Cuba is so far low, is because of the 50 year long embargo of the island.
USA should be higher. But your corporations and insruance companies and your pharma industry have sold you out. The latter tend to invent the drug before the desease.There are a few things that superseeds "majority" rule. That is the rule of law, and simple human rights. What does this apply to?
This ILLEGAL action, perpetrated by a band of runaway socialists, will be shot down by the Supreme Court of the US. It is unconstitutional on AT LEAST 3 grounds.
Aside from that, Missouri and many other states have already passed resolutions stating that they will not Abide by the new legislation.
This is what happens when you try to do things that are both ILLEGAL and against the "consent of the governed."
Public healthcare is not an illegal action. It's common sense!
Your use of "socialist" as if some RW talking point pundit at FOX degrades your credibility in this discussion. You shouldn't stupe to teabagger level.
Misouri legislators obviously have not taken the people without healthcare into consideration, and obviously don't give a damn about them
If I was running for some office in or for Missouri, that would be my campaign: GOP want to deny your grandma Medicare, and want your neighbour rather to die than to get access to public healthcare!
The I would go on a smear campaign that would superseed everything that even the most cynical Karl Rove disciple could ever dream of...
The great philosophers of government understood that you need a super majority of people to support any major change in government. That's why the Constitution requires 75% of the states to agree on any major changes.
You actually have WELL OVER 60% AGAINST this bill. That's where the problem is, historically and legally.
And finally. These matters you discuss were already worked out by the GREATEST MINDS in the history of the world. John Locke, Cicero, Montequieu, Blackstone, Polybius, Jefferson, Adams, Rothbard, and so forth. We CHOSE to be a FREE REPUBLIC with the right to succeed and the right to fail.....all based on our individual desires and hard work. We haven't had a FREE market economy in the US since 1913. I suggest you read jefferson or Locke and learn a bit more.
On(01-28-10), Michael "Savage" Weiner stated that he had seen a young man, a woman and a baby. From this alone he knew that man was 15 y/o the woman was 14 y/o. He also knew that they lived in section 8 housing and that they were illegal aliens. WOW!
I call on all EDUCATORS & STUDENTS to write letters in protest to A) your congressperson or senator B) the FCC and C) all companies that advertise on his radio show. Tell them that you do not support RACISTS LIKE WEINER.
The right always talks about "far left loonies". But honestly, with a few exceptions, are left wing talkshow hosts doing this on the left? I think not. This is terrifying. Conservatism currently takes the cake concerning extremism.
I don't hear any of you disagreeing with "these talking heads". Like Boortz tells you " the truth hurts and will make you mad" you people r a great example.
Oh, I disagree with most everything they say. I think TV, radio, and print has gotten far out of control with these right wing extremists. Whatever violent, diseased hatred forms in their mind then just comes tumbling out of their mouths with absolutely no self-responsibility. And I remember once I heard Boortz ask a man who had lost 2 jobs in 7 months due to the economic downturn how much rent-to-own furniture he had in his house! As if that made some kind of difference. They're idiots.
Add that pig, Limbaugh, to the list of these angry white men whose enemies are: social justice and tolerance ! What does it expose about many Americans who listen to and believe these bastards? Often times, these "shock jocks" exploit the uneducated and poorest Americans! They should be held accountable for their behavior.
Frankly if anything was to happen to them because of what these village idiots instigate to their baa baa black sheep to the President I say I shed no tears for their payback that impacts their families and their just desserts they deserve!!!
@rncoco The far right (and I will not include O'Reilly) but Limbaugh, Beck, and Savage thinks anything liberal is bad and some of these far right nutjobs who worship these shock jocks. You have to wonder how many of them will take the law into their own hands.
Watch SHOWNAMYSTERY on YOUTUBE
mjtf1113 2 weeks ago
what if its me that he wants to shoot
kilbilly100 3 months ago
So Al Gore's a Nazi because he's crusading against global warming? Global warming is not a ethnic group, let alone a person you peice of shit Glenn Beck
laxspanker1984 1 year ago
It used to be that radio stations that used PUBLIC AIRWAYS were required by the FCC to devote equal time to opposing points of view on topics that were deemed in the PUBLIC INTEREST.If a station did not meet this requirement it would lose its license.Reagan did away with the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE.Then with the help of a handful of rich individuals right wing extremism on PUBLIC airways was forced upon all.The Reagan era was the beginning of America's decline in all aspects of what once made it great
poindexterwitkowsky 1 year ago 83
Dont worry, though. The 50% of us that make this country tick are already prepared for this inevitable collapse of the Liberal/Progessive socialist movement. We have Gold, Silver and other instruments invested abroad and we have the GUTS and the DRIVE to be INDIVIDUALS who can make it all happen so the rest of you collective idiots all have a country left when your MASSIVE government fails you.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
When the average dumb liberal figures out that they have been lied to, that it is IMPOSSIBLE for government to deliver the services promised.....that it is IMPOSSIBLE for 50% of the population to carry the other 50% on their backs, that FDR was warned in 1935 that Social Security would collapse in 80 years due to the anticipated birth rates, that the Federal Reserve is Illegal, Fannie & Freddie are Illegal and that the social benefits cant be paid...they are going to riot...just like Greece
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
As the bankrupted Union Pension plans collapse (they will not continue because they are PONZI schemes and Pyramid schemes), as the State and Local governments go Bankrupt, as Social Security and Medicare FAIL, as 1/3 of the banks collapse due to Federal interference, this Depression will grip the United States. At that point, it will become IMPOSSIBLE for the Progressive Socialists and communists to conceal the damage they have done to this country over the past 80 years.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
Comment removed
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
Ha! FreeTheNation is trying to justify this hate speech.
You know this is alot worse than your wife saying she would
kill you if you leave the house a mess. Plus you want to
use that analogy, OK. Your wife is saying that to one person.
these people are saying this hate talk to millions. its possible
these millions of people they are speaking to might not be as
smart as FreeTheNation is in thinking.."Oh, this is just meaningless
talk"..lol
ImAmoderateLiberal 1 year ago 2
@ImAmoderateLiberal
Question:
Why is it OK for EVERY single liberal/progressive/communist/socialist/collectivist/Democrat to call ME a racist because I don't want the Federal Government to take me down with them in their economic suicide march??
Why is that OK??
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
Ah! He's a prep student whos just learned the names of some Europpean thinkers, and tries to adapt 18th century ideas to today.
All you have to do is to have an ounce of patience and use some common sense.
People whom are using Fixed Noise as their sole source of information will react the same way as the Germans when they are being exposed to the lies they've been brainwashed for 12 years with Hitler: react in disbelief. I sometimes wonder if they are as disconnected to the world as DPRK
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REPUBLICANS ARE A DeVIOUS BUNCH.They love the undocumented as long as they don't ask for anything & allow themselves to work dangerously for very little pay. REPUBLICANS got rich embracing & promoting DEREGULATION. They are to blame for the worst financial crisis since 1929.Currently they are blocking all debate on the subject of WALL STREET REFORM. They claimed they were for healthcare reform but they NEVER had a plan. IT'S CLEAR THEY DON'T GIVE A DAMN ABOUT AMERICA. THEY WILL BE FINISHED.
poindexterwitkowsky 1 year ago
"the white race is dying"...
"caucasian births are in free fall.".."demographic decline of America".."the west is in decline"...."our nation will disappear"..These words (among others) were uttered by Michael "Savage" Weiner during one segment of his radio show on 04-13-2010. They sound like words one would hear at a Klan rally.
poindexterwitkowsky 1 year ago 5
my wife said she's going to kill me if I ever leave the house as messy as I did last week........did she mean it.
If her brother heard her, would he want to kill me????
get a grip
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation Your analogy has to be some of the dumbest shit I have ever heard in my life.
smartpeoplewillagree 1 year ago
@smartpeoplewillagree
could you be more specific than that??? this is the way it usually goes for progressive/collectivists. They either make a general statement of insult or they attack a person based on ONE thing they get wrong.....ignoring the other 90 things that were correctly stated. Please help me see the light on Glenn Beck. I've seen nearly every show he has broadcasted in the past 4 years and am an expert on both his show and his message
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
Glenn Beck broadcasts 20 hours of content a week, every week. There is a part of his show that is parody, comedy and satire.....and then there is the larger part of his show which is CUTTING EDGE interviews and education. So if you take the 50,000 plus hours of broadcasting and you find a few seconds of off color comedy or satire....AS IF HE HONESTLY PLANS ON KILLING SOMEONE, then you are talking about less than 1/100,000th of the material that you disagree with.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Cutting edge interviews and education? What education? "I'm Glenn Blowhard Beck, I'm here to teach you that Obama is a racist communist fascist!"
Boy that sure is enlightening. Not to mention that being a communist AND a fascist is a theoretically impossible thing to accomplish.
Grow up, Beck knows just as much about history and politics as a rock does.
Rahab111222 1 year ago
@Rahab111222
all you did was call me a blowhard...beck.
hmmmm.
care to have a more meaningful debate than that, my friend??
be careful...you may be totally outread, outeducated and the rest, which may make you feel inadequate.
Let me know if you'd like to be schooled in economics, hisory and law.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@Rahab111222
let's explore facts. Beck never called obama a racist. Beck never called obama a facscist...although facisms and communism have a great deal in common.
Beck DID call obama a Socialist....because he is. He is a Socialist of the Fabian School. Don't know what fabianism is...look it up. That's what Obama is.
Let's debate some facts....but I forgot...one has to actually KNOW some facts to debate them.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@Rahab111222
Glenn Beck is responsible for some of the most detailed explanations on the history of law and economics that has every been broadcast in the history of Television. He is the first Television show, INCLUDING EVERY MAJOR NEWS OUTLET, that has ever explored the Federal Reserve in detail, along with every aspect of the debt of the government and our banking system. Please tell me which shows you have seen with which you take objection....and he has never called obama a racist
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Hehe! That's funny.
Rahab111222 1 year ago
@Rahab111222
Look everyone. Rahab can't make an argument or factual debabe.
he just makes idiotic comments. LOOK HOW DUMB HE IS
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Don't tell me you bought into Beck's Online University?
Glenn Beck said right ion the air on Fox & Friends "I believe that Obama is a racist".... "I think that Obama has a deep seeded hatred towards white folks, or white culture"...
It's funny how he tried to debunk GWBs FEMA camps, and suddenly popped up with theories as if those were Obama invetions.
He's not about information or education. He's about fearmongering and lies for profit...
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
I don't need it. I'm well studied already.
Apparently you didn't watch my interview with world renowned ecnomist Robert Prechter....who is in the Triple 9 society (look it up, since you don't know what 999 society is).
Which of the Educational Glenn Beck episodes have you watched and disagree with. the ones about the Federal Reserve....
Or how about all the episodes on economics that he did 4-5 years ago.....with economists and all - on the COMING COLLAPSE......
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Sorry. but I can only handle Glenn Beck in very small proportions before I have to vomit.
Why should I pay 80 quid to get BS, while I can have a laugh for free on Conservapedia.
Nobody disafree about either the IRS or the Federal Reserve. (Isn't that a privatly owned entitiy?)
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1 -
You shouldn't allow your emotions to rule you like that. Babe Ruth Struck out more than just about any other baseball player of his time and had a number of personal struggles. Yet, he was also one of the most prolific baseball players in the history of the game. Beck's work on economics alone is some of the most groundbreaking work that has ever been done on television. He is the first TV host to have such cutting edge and in depth reporting on such a dry topic.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
The basis for collaps started with GWB tax cuts for his mates, while they ran off to Bahamas while outsorucing the work force, GWB dismantled, or at least speadied up the dismantlement of Social Security, and squandering the surplus in two wars of choice.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1 -
My friend - If you were well studied in these matters you would understand that these seeds were sewn back in the 1920s and 1930s. BTW - I don't support GWB and neither does Beck. I support Ron Paul and Peter Schiff. This collapse is the result of 80+ years of Lies and corruption by a country that was taken over by socialists. Social Security, Medicare, welfare, Fannie Mae, Freddie mac. The US was lost to socialists long ago. The birth rate concealed the damage
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1 -
Social Security is Unconstitutional, Medicare is Unconstitutional, the FHA and HUD are Unconstitutional, The Federal Reserve is Unconstitutional, The PAPER MONEY supply is Unconstitutional, Fannie Mae and Freddie mac are Unconsitutional, the WHOLE ENTIRETY of department of Labor is Unconstitutional, The FED dept of education is Unconstitutional, the Dept of Energy is Unconsitutional, Health care bill is Unconstitutional.
These are the causations of the coming collapse
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
I got one thing to say aboiut that:
And I'm quoting Washington ;ontlhy who quoted Eisenhower
«Should any political party attempt to abolish social security, unemployment insurance and eliminat labor laws and fram programgs, you would not hear fromthat party again in our political history».
The president ackonwledged in the letter that there are som who advocate such nonsense, but added, «Their number is negligible and they are supid.»
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
Put it like this:
"Life liberty and opursuitof happiness" menas in the broadest sense of interpretation also means universal healthcare.
GOP wnat the US to go back to pre 1935 status where the likes of you would be forced out in the dimpster to find something to eat, and some scrap metal to sell.
Also; Is schools, fire dpet. Homeland Security, Bush' FEMA, waging pre emptive wars and pallying upto the military industrial complex constitutuional? Is the drug laws constitutional?
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
If you took the time to ACTUALLY READ what those words meant...by the study of the works written by the MEN WHO WROTE THEM, then you would understand that it means that the Government's ONLY PURPOSE is to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY, LIFE and LIBERTY. In 1935 the US was the WEATHIEST nation in the history of the world. We are now the largest DEBTOR nation in the world.
You need to read. READ READ READ.
Drug laws are unconstitutional as well as the pre-emptive wars
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
I see you are cutting and pasting parts of the Bill of Rights to make it fit into your talking points.
And what is "LIFE" without access to healthcare?
I am a vet from Bosnia '93. I have had symptoms of PSTD on and off for 16 years.
As I live in England these days, I have a UK SS number, and pay my NIS each month. When I need a doctor, I get an appt almost immedialtely, and I don't get charged a dime. How much does it cost for an uninsured to get a docs apt in USA?
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
What is life without access to food, shelter, clothing, education, a house......
Access to healthcare, food, shelter, clothing, transportation....these are called "GOODS AND SERVICES." In a FREE country....you know, the type without dictators...YOU WORK, MAKE MONEY and you BUY GOODS and SERVICES.
Rights are INTANGIBLE CONCEPTS THAT COME DIRECTLY TO THE INDIVIDUAL FROM GOD.....Not from another man. Government is instituted to Protect these god given rights..
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
Govt can't give rights to any person. That's why the Declaration of Independence so specifically states this. Government is instituted to protect private property rights, to protect one's physical body from being DIRECTLY assaulted by another person, and to protect your liberties from being directly assaulted by any person or group of people. The Federal Government was given only 17 very limited and specific powers. That's a republic. WE now live in a socialist state
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation Two fallacies in your train of thought:
Look up socialism and get educated before starting to talk about things you have no clue about. It makes you look less silly. If any socialism, Bush introduced "socialism" for the rich. Fact is that USA is far closer to Fascism than socialism.
Your liberties? Got sold out when Bush and his gangsters swiped them away by introducing that Patriot Act.
I hate the fact that I can't bring a bottle of Whisky through security anymore at airports.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
There are about 20 forms of socialism. I'm well read on the subject matter. Call it Collectivism if you prefer....or Fabianism. Both parties are socialist already. Social Security, medicare, health care bill.......all of it is socialism. I am always amused that you progressives think that anyone who is AGAINST your marxist doctines are FOR the Republicans. There is a third way, which is defined by Jefferson. I agree with you on Bush....hated the PATRIOT ACT.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Two:
You're acting like you were still living in the 1700s with all these "freedoms & liberties" shit.
What about the freedoms and liberties to have access to affordable healthcare?
Or being free to have a bong hit without having to worry about being dragged in like some common criminal?
If you rather want your tax dollars being spent on tax cuts for the rich, Wall Street bailouts with no oversight, illegal wars, and warrantless wiretapping than healthcare for all,
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
Truths are not affected by time. Newton's concepts of motion and law from the 1600s are every bit as effective today as they were then. John Locke is considered among the THREE GREATEST MINDS TO EVER BE PRODUCED BY THE WORLD, according to Jefferson.
If you took the time to read the book, Two Treatises on Government, which our entire system of law is predicated upon, you would understand what I am trying to teach you. No government has the right to directly tax a person
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
So a tax cut for the rich is actually just a correction of an IMMORAL and ILLEGAL theft of private property from one group of people. The Constitution FORBID taxing any person directly, unless there was a census and each person in the country paid the same exact amount of money....not even the same percentage....but the same FLAT dolllar amount. Taxing Labour is immoral and breeds the type of corruption that we see today.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
I barely support a single word Bush ever said. He was bad, Obama is ten times worse. No.....I prefer that the FEDZILLA be put back into it's constitutional cage. There are 17 SPECIFIC & LIMITED enumerated powers that were delegated to the Federal Government in our Constitution. We need to cut everything and anything that isn't included in that list. From there, we can pass constitutional amendments for the things we wish to keep. That requires 75% of us on board.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
Don't lie! In October 2001, he got well over 80% approval ratings. And don't come to me and tell me that you were the rational minority whom knew that Bush was full of it. I bet you voted for Bush twice! And listen to Sean Hannity, and think you have an ounce of knowledge about the constitution. And now you are all wind up because someone is taking your MSM outlets down. Rachel Maddow is a true journalist with integrity and humor. Your media outlets are obviousl Fox, and some ancient manifesto.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
I did vote for Bush twice...the LESSER of TWO Evils.
Now I am for a THIRD PARTY. I realize the error of my ways....unlike you.
I debate Sean Hannity intensely....three times. One was a 17 minute intense debate about TRUE principles of LIBERTY. Maddow is a fool. She doesn't know anything. Anyone who listens to her is a dumbASS. She is perhaps one of the dumbest women I have ever heard. She knows nothing about history, law, economics or the Constitution
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
I bet that you were Bush biggest fan with his tough talk....
Hence you wouldn't be hear living in denial, going insane that your fascist GOP media oulets gets it.
Your making a jackass of yourself for everybody to see...
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
I don't support the GOP....at all.
I support people like Tom Woods, Peter Schiff and Judge Andrew Napolitano. I am of the Jefferson and Locke school...The Austrian school.
Since you don't know who F.A. Hayeck is...I'm from that school.
You don't know anything other than "POP" Politics....people who are famous from TV. That's why your debate is TWO dimentional. You have no real knowledge of Economics or the history of law and government. You haven't read the major works
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
... then we know what kind of person you are.
You are against the American people, thinking that things haven't changed since the days when the Iroquis skalped you forefathers (if your ties to America goes that far)....
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
My grandfather was born in italy. I am for TRUTH. The truth is that Natural Law has been well explained by the GREATEST MINDS TO EVER LIVE. There is nothing more to say on the matter.
Should we listen to an intellectual midget and liar like Barrack Obama or should we listen to John Locke???
Hmmmmmm......
Rachel Maddow or Thomas Jefferson... Hmmmm
No...There's a reason that Jefferson called Locke the greatest philosophical mind in the history of the world. READ IT!!!
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Ah, so you nothing more than a descendant of some filthy gold digging immigrants, eh
You are obviously a drone whom are making pathetic attempts to use Thomas Jefferson for you cause. Thomas Jefferson and Rachel Maddow! Talk about the little engine that could, make hillariously stupid comparrisons.
It's also obvious that you are using Glenn Beck as source of information.
Truth? You wouldn't know what the truth was if it hit you on the head.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness doesn't mean whatever any one person or any group of people want it to mean. It actually isn't meant in YOUR "broadest sense." It means what the author, Jefferson, defines it as. That definition is as described in the Bible. All men report directly to God and not to each other or a government. Government is institued to protect our lives (from murder), our liberty (to do as we see fit) and our property.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
Jefferson's original text stated Life, Liberty and PROPERTY.
They changed the world property to the Pursuit of happiness, which was defined as each man's GOD given right to do whatever he wants, to dispose of his life and his property as he sees fit, without the consent of any other man or government.....so long as it does not DIRECTLY harm another person's life or property.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
2008 is the warm-up act. EVERY move the Bush made was wrong..Oama is Bush on Steroids. You are being lied to, played like a Fiddle. If I can only get ONE point through all of you uneducated ppl it would be this: MATH DOESN'T lie. It is mathematically impossible for the financial promises to be kept. Period. The US IS ALREADY A SOCIALIST NATION. Socialism ALWAYS leads to bankrupcy. PERIOD. Read Adam Smith, "The Wealth Of Nations" "The Invisible Hand."
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
The US is not a socialist country. It's a country run by corporate interests. US fascism is not about Hitloresque black shirts and "Fahne Hoch". It comes in the form of a CEO, with the help of a media outlet to make you go against your own interest. He's using new speech, and you take the bait.It the US was a socialist country, you would be avble to get a doctors appoiintment on Monday without getting your wallet raped...
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
No, my friend....It's Socialist with a tint of Communism and a dash of Facsism.
Many people go to the grocery store, the doctors office and collect checks from the government daily. Hell, there's probably as many people on the government dole as there are taxpayers.
I'd suggest that you read a few books on economics. Like many Americans, you are ignorant of the meaning of these words.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Sorry! I think you should open a book of socialism, communism and fascism. What you have today is far closer to fascism today with the Bush policies that is still being imposed than any Europpean social democratic government today.
Churchill when he was younger, he stood behind both social security as well as a publigc healthcare system. Would you put Chruchill in the same sauce pan as Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin and Pol Pot?
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
The thing is with all these thinkers, is that they lived in a different time. You simply cannot apply the values of those days into todays system.
I have taken economics at school. And guess what? What your "experts" in DC have been doing since their Reaganomics is simply inane.
As for your statistical claims, I would appreciate some statistics.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
You have limited resources, and you cannot wage war forever. It will be your downfall. Specially if your GOP continue to screw over the voters, and giving their mates more tax cuts at the expence of important things.
How about actually start following the Constitution and follow common economical sense?
End the war on drugs
End your empire ambitions
End the tax cuts for the ones whos got too much already.
End the Corporate dominion
End the tax exemptions for churches who meddle in politics
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
You have limited resources, & cannot wage war forever. It will be your downfall. Specially if your GOP continue to screw over the voters, and giving their mates more tax cuts at the expence of important things.Instead of putting your Europpean allies down as "commie dummies" you should have some humble pie, & learn something. Healthcare is a universal right no matter how you try to spin it, and shouldn't come up for a popular vote. It's like having a referendum on slavery in Mississippi in 1859
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
You seem like you care about truth. Here are some important books for you:
1. The 5000 year leap.
2. The wealth of Nations - Adam Smith
3. Two Treatises on Government - John Locke
4. The Federalist Papers
5. The writings of Thomas Jefferson and John Adams
Start there.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
I've gone though both Adam Smith as well as John Locke in philosophy studies.
Thomas Jefferson for good and bad had many sides. One was the typical elitist school of thought that resembles any nobleman.
John Adams was a federalist.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
If Obama ws Bush with steroid, he would have rammed through Åublic Healthcare within months, and prosecuted the Bush Crime family after an intense investigation where all the diry secrets would come out (including the Wikilieaks).
Obviously math is something that GOP & Boehner doesnæt like very much. Specially when it comes to their defense of the continuation of tax cuts for the rich.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
First of all, taxing the "rich" isn't something that needs defended. No group of people has a right to STEAL money from another group of people. Don't be such a dumb communist. Let me ask you a question...
What is the definition of a "Rich" Person.
Second question:
Who was empowered by the Gods to determine what that definition is???
This has nothing to do with the GOP and everything to do with Communism
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1 -
Bush was a freedom crushing big government politician and Obama is even worse.
Public healthcare isn't something that is afforded to our Government by the US Constitution. Therefore, it would require a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT to bring a change like this about. That would never happen because only 20% of the population support it. You need 75% of the States to support a Constitutional Amendment.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Even if a public healthcare bill is not afforded word for word by your consitution, it's not unconstitutional either. Remember the 1st amendment? It says life, liberty & pursuit of happiness. Now how can you achieve this if your health is poor, your poor and you have no access to affordable healthcare system?
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
Your statistics are dubious to say the least. What FOX News talking points forgot to mention when they claimed that the majority of the people is against the bill, is that at least 15% thought is wasn't proggressive enough. And the a Fox viewer have a tendency to overlook that.
Even though I'm not American, but have spent many a summer there, as well as taking part of my education there, I see the flaws of your present healthcare system. There's a reason why USA numbers 37 on the world ranking
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
right arround Costa Rica and Cuba. The only reason why Cuba is so far low, is because of the 50 year long embargo of the island.
USA should be higher. But your corporations and insruance companies and your pharma industry have sold you out. The latter tend to invent the drug before the desease.There are a few things that superseeds "majority" rule. That is the rule of law, and simple human rights. What does this apply to?
Marriage
Pro choice
Use of marijuana
healthcare
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1 -
This ILLEGAL action, perpetrated by a band of runaway socialists, will be shot down by the Supreme Court of the US. It is unconstitutional on AT LEAST 3 grounds.
Aside from that, Missouri and many other states have already passed resolutions stating that they will not Abide by the new legislation.
This is what happens when you try to do things that are both ILLEGAL and against the "consent of the governed."
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@FreeTheNation
Public healthcare is not an illegal action. It's common sense!
Your use of "socialist" as if some RW talking point pundit at FOX degrades your credibility in this discussion. You shouldn't stupe to teabagger level.
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
Misouri legislators obviously have not taken the people without healthcare into consideration, and obviously don't give a damn about them
If I was running for some office in or for Missouri, that would be my campaign: GOP want to deny your grandma Medicare, and want your neighbour rather to die than to get access to public healthcare!
The I would go on a smear campaign that would superseed everything that even the most cynical Karl Rove disciple could ever dream of...
bohemianwriter1 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
The great philosophers of government understood that you need a super majority of people to support any major change in government. That's why the Constitution requires 75% of the states to agree on any major changes.
You actually have WELL OVER 60% AGAINST this bill. That's where the problem is, historically and legally.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
@bohemianwriter1
And finally. These matters you discuss were already worked out by the GREATEST MINDS in the history of the world. John Locke, Cicero, Montequieu, Blackstone, Polybius, Jefferson, Adams, Rothbard, and so forth. We CHOSE to be a FREE REPUBLIC with the right to succeed and the right to fail.....all based on our individual desires and hard work. We haven't had a FREE market economy in the US since 1913. I suggest you read jefferson or Locke and learn a bit more.
FreeTheNation 1 year ago
On(01-28-10), Michael "Savage" Weiner stated that he had seen a young man, a woman and a baby. From this alone he knew that man was 15 y/o the woman was 14 y/o. He also knew that they lived in section 8 housing and that they were illegal aliens. WOW!
I call on all EDUCATORS & STUDENTS to write letters in protest to A) your congressperson or senator B) the FCC and C) all companies that advertise on his radio show. Tell them that you do not support RACISTS LIKE WEINER.
poindexterwitkowsky 2 years ago 3
The right always talks about "far left loonies". But honestly, with a few exceptions, are left wing talkshow hosts doing this on the left? I think not. This is terrifying. Conservatism currently takes the cake concerning extremism.
maulhoik 2 years ago 8
I don't hear any of you disagreeing with "these talking heads". Like Boortz tells you " the truth hurts and will make you mad" you people r a great example.
cdp37 2 years ago
Oh, I disagree with most everything they say. I think TV, radio, and print has gotten far out of control with these right wing extremists. Whatever violent, diseased hatred forms in their mind then just comes tumbling out of their mouths with absolutely no self-responsibility. And I remember once I heard Boortz ask a man who had lost 2 jobs in 7 months due to the economic downturn how much rent-to-own furniture he had in his house! As if that made some kind of difference. They're idiots.
jerico641 2 years ago
@jerico641 If you crave "violent, diseased hatred," look no further than MSNBC and your own posts, lying Jerico641.
I can respect a man "who has lost two jobs." I cannot respect people like you who never even looked for one to begin with.
RadarGuidedVermin 7 months ago
Add that pig, Limbaugh, to the list of these angry white men whose enemies are: social justice and tolerance ! What does it expose about many Americans who listen to and believe these bastards? Often times, these "shock jocks" exploit the uneducated and poorest Americans! They should be held accountable for their behavior.
skowheganme 2 years ago
Savage,OŔeilly and Hannity should be arrested for conspiracy to incite violence. What they promote is nothing short of hate speech.
philster61 2 years ago 23
Frankly if anything was to happen to them because of what these village idiots instigate to their baa baa black sheep to the President I say I shed no tears for their payback that impacts their families and their just desserts they deserve!!!
Ediva75 2 years ago
Well said; thank you.
jerico641 2 years ago
Well said; thanks.
jerico641 2 years ago
Don't forget Beck!
jerico641 2 years ago
@philster61 yes I second that. Can't forget about Savage.
y2zgt 1 year ago
this is so eye opening.
rncoco 2 years ago 3
@rncoco The far right (and I will not include O'Reilly) but Limbaugh, Beck, and Savage thinks anything liberal is bad and some of these far right nutjobs who worship these shock jocks. You have to wonder how many of them will take the law into their own hands.
RealTime88 1 year ago