@NohhPutsuTV lol i just read the comments from top to bottom. he's like "This wasn't made by me. It was made by Ben Procter who designed some of the bots from the film. This is an early test for the film of course." 3 times then i get to your comment IT WAS NOT MADE BY HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lololol
thisis almost done like a reverse particle emmitter. More pieces stick to the upper torso then the lower torso etc.. and lastly they go back and fine tune that. Run it in reverse and you have a crazy looking but somewhat logical transformation. Trust me, there is alot of part cheating going on. They did not model every single tiny piece of the inside of that truck, and then have each piece break into other pieces. You overestimate if you think it's that miraclous.
While there was a lot of cheating involved in transformers, every part was definitely modeled by a person and most of the pieces were animated by hand. Particle emitters would be far too much of a hassle an end up taking more time than hand keying.
That's what this stage is, they fine tune where the wheels go, the windshield etc. And lastly, for the amazing little pieces, it's actually done with an algorithm to break up larger parts into smaller parts and one of the variables is "stickiness", how many little parts stick where...
the "guarded" secret of the transforming style they use is quite simple, in the firs run, they fold up a man-shaped robot into a "cool" looking way, as in having the arms unfold in front, or the legs transform from the back or middle or wherever looks best, then the next stage they stick large sections of the vehicle to the mannequin to see how they might pull apart into robot mode.
Exactly. It takes a LOT of effort to see what goes where (which takes away part of the fun of seeing the TFs transform), but you can almost make out the center of the cab turning into the torso, the front of it turning into the arms, and the wheels and bottom of the truck turn into the legs. Where does the BACK of the cab go?
Do you mean me? I never said it was made by me. It was made by Ben Procter one of the guys working on the film. Read the info. There's a link to his site.
i think the knee has a t- joint,half stays up behind the cab and the other half is under the hood. a really long waist joint would then bring the bumper up to his waist. and the two halves of the leg would snap together.
There is a way to get this to work withou following the exact cgi steps. but its too long for 1 comment
because it would be too complicated for children to transform. There will be too many moving bits that if you had a manual, you'll probably lose track of the transformation.
Because it's NOT possible. Did you see how many parts were simply floating through each other? These Transformers were designed to look overly cool, not real.
no, all these parts are joined. this is just one of the early animation where they're not paying close attention to the joints. This early process is when animatics are deciding where each car part should go in robot form.
Maybe not, but they needed to make it look like a physically feasible robot. This looks like a mechanical version of Sandman, where every piece is somehow holding hands with every OTHER piece instead of a real TF which would twist and turn a specific series of parts to change from one form to another.
it would be impossible to make a toy version of this, unless it was a life size scale toy because there is just too many moving pieces for a little toy.Bear in mind that there are 10,108 moving parts as he transforms.
That's what I've always thought too. They needed to make physical models first, then copy those into the computer. They'd make something far more practical and thus more realistic, and maybe Jazz would have been able to survive being torn in half since they would discover that his torso is made of two different pieces, which would NOT kill him of they were separated.
It doesn't need to be the final render. The idea is to simulate something that is supposed to happen in the real world, but this animation is physically impossible even in the context of a scifi flick.
clip clip clip :) but anyways it shure took weeks to model, it looks very detailed ... it could be a study for the animators maybe ..
i agree on the transformations in the new movie ... it kinda looks cool but its glassclear that this could not be done in real world ... they should have made it more "classic" ... i mean that optimus prime is a joke ... thats not optimus prime :)
actually, the transformations were figured out by mathematical equations, so it worked right. if you look at the G1 transformations, they look really wierd, and those are the ones that don't really look right.
not bad.just fix the color
OptimusNikola 3 months ago
guys listen! IT WAS NOT MADE BY HIM, ASK HIM-/HERSELF!!
IT WAS MADE BY Ben Procter WHO MADE THE TRANSFORMERS FILM!!
NohhPutsuTV 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NohhPutsuTV lol i just read the comments from top to bottom. he's like "This wasn't made by me. It was made by Ben Procter who designed some of the bots from the film. This is an early test for the film of course." 3 times then i get to your comment IT WAS NOT MADE BY HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lololol
elasticrubberband123 9 months ago
it was too fast
supergenius1994 2 years ago
transforming animations are really hard to make! great job!
yvaaar 2 years ago
what program was used?
SwitchLiveProduction 2 years ago
well, the grill doesnt become the chest pieces below the windows, more like the pieces of truck right behind behind the grill the slide in
jacksaracrishagar 2 years ago
nice, but te front rubber tire suddenly flies to the hips??? ... very nice animation. though. keep it up, is there another video you have?
arvinangeles2000 2 years ago
This wasn't made by me. It was made by Ben Procter who designed some of the bots from the film. This is an early test for the film of course.
shinobirendar 2 years ago
that wasent a tire that was the gold peice that conects to his knee joints.
sonicblade9 2 years ago
pretty cool, except the grill is supposed to be the first thing that transforms, It splits in 2, before anything else happens
5* though
KiNG5333 2 years ago
This wasn't made by me. It was made by Ben Procter who designed some of the bots from the film. This is an early test for the film of course.
shinobirendar 2 years ago
remember this isan't the final transformation used in the movie.
sonicblade9 2 years ago
yeah I know now, I went to Ben Procter's Website and found out
KiNG5333 2 years ago
its just like the new ROTF Optimus Prime.
superlemonhead19 2 years ago
Cool
Aumfreaky 2 years ago
That's probably the most complex Optimus Prime transformation that I have seen. Congratulations!
Optimus136 2 years ago
reason why is cause he made the one for the movie! this is a work in progress on that one!
steamisM50 2 years ago
nice, i made a much simpler transformer, and that drove me nuts
funkhauser81 3 years ago
it's nice smooth and every thing but it looks like all his peices were pulled to the top lol
sk8blitz 3 years ago 3
thisis almost done like a reverse particle emmitter. More pieces stick to the upper torso then the lower torso etc.. and lastly they go back and fine tune that. Run it in reverse and you have a crazy looking but somewhat logical transformation. Trust me, there is alot of part cheating going on. They did not model every single tiny piece of the inside of that truck, and then have each piece break into other pieces. You overestimate if you think it's that miraclous.
blowupneoblitZ 3 years ago 5
of course they cheated on a few pieces but also did the animated series so it's not that bad
Plus in the movie you never see the inside of the camib so you can't be shure about if it's empty or not
KneeCapHill 2 years ago
While there was a lot of cheating involved in transformers, every part was definitely modeled by a person and most of the pieces were animated by hand. Particle emitters would be far too much of a hassle an end up taking more time than hand keying.
dandeentremont 2 years ago
@blowupneoblitZ : particle emmiter ???..bull s***t
MrMashetty 11 months ago
That's what this stage is, they fine tune where the wheels go, the windshield etc. And lastly, for the amazing little pieces, it's actually done with an algorithm to break up larger parts into smaller parts and one of the variables is "stickiness", how many little parts stick where...
blowupneoblitZ 3 years ago 2
the "guarded" secret of the transforming style they use is quite simple, in the firs run, they fold up a man-shaped robot into a "cool" looking way, as in having the arms unfold in front, or the legs transform from the back or middle or wherever looks best, then the next stage they stick large sections of the vehicle to the mannequin to see how they might pull apart into robot mode.
blowupneoblitZ 3 years ago 3
you know whats wierd? in the movie, optimus has no wings, but the toy does.
krakelak 3 years ago 2
the back of the cab just seems too..disintegrate
vincymon 4 years ago
Exactly. It takes a LOT of effort to see what goes where (which takes away part of the fun of seeing the TFs transform), but you can almost make out the center of the cab turning into the torso, the front of it turning into the arms, and the wheels and bottom of the truck turn into the legs. Where does the BACK of the cab go?
Bobzeaux 4 years ago 3
apparently it just forms folds around his waist..which seems pretty pointless to me
vincymon 4 years ago
if you look closely, i think the back piece of the cab transforms into the thighs, then the rear wheels attach to it.
Xsubs 3 years ago
you really realize how much they cheat with intersecting bodies when you see it raw like this.. its ok, im an animator, i cheat all the time
jameson63926 4 years ago
That's totally fine. At least you're ADMITTING it. :P
Bobzeaux 4 years ago
Awesome video!
jdpjrdude 4 years ago
ok look at his arms hwen they come out in the back.... then they go through his body and appear again 5/5 stars!
pivot656 4 years ago
um hes arms are the front of the truck where the engine iss
sonicblade9 3 years ago 2
no the arms are at the back.
KremzeekRulz 3 years ago
No no no no.
Optimus136 2 years ago
that was cool
psycholian 4 years ago
so messy in there
guanqiaohang 4 years ago
it would be more realistic if it didnt transform all at once plus the wheels roll up and attach to octomuses thighs
sonicblade9 4 years ago
Now thats cool
Ram123Ram112233 4 years ago
That couldnt have been done by you that same thing is in the Second disc of the movie
Eythor20 4 years ago
Do you mean me? I never said it was made by me. It was made by Ben Procter one of the guys working on the film. Read the info. There's a link to his site.
shinobirendar 4 years ago
That is some pretty complex stuff
wakeupfist 4 years ago
I was wondering how his wheels got way up there on his thighs....
cyborgtroy 4 years ago 2
lol yeah
dudefromtheplace 4 years ago 2
keep your eyes on the rear wheels as optimus' transforms.
4718253 4 years ago
double transformation...lol
TransformerLover360 4 years ago
i think the knee has a t- joint,half stays up behind the cab and the other half is under the hood. a really long waist joint would then bring the bumper up to his waist. and the two halves of the leg would snap together.
There is a way to get this to work withou following the exact cgi steps. but its too long for 1 comment
vincymon 4 years ago
Aw, this is the old design...
They changed this many times before the final render.
TheDarthChop 4 years ago 3
If this is possible, why cant they make a toy lke that?
smallsam52 4 years ago
good quetion....maybe in the next twenty years we'll get a 20th anniversary movie edition
vincymon 4 years ago
because it would be too complicated for children to transform. There will be too many moving bits that if you had a manual, you'll probably lose track of the transformation.
4718253 4 years ago
Because it's NOT possible. Did you see how many parts were simply floating through each other? These Transformers were designed to look overly cool, not real.
Bobzeaux 4 years ago 2
no, all these parts are joined. this is just one of the early animation where they're not paying close attention to the joints. This early process is when animatics are deciding where each car part should go in robot form.
4718253 4 years ago
They've already got that part figured out. They're just not caring about how it gets there.
What they should have done is make physical models of them that actually could transform like the toys, and THEN rebuild them in the computer.
Bobzeaux 4 years ago
they probably didn't want it to look "like" a toy first like in some of the earlier series.
vincymon 4 years ago
Maybe not, but they needed to make it look like a physically feasible robot. This looks like a mechanical version of Sandman, where every piece is somehow holding hands with every OTHER piece instead of a real TF which would twist and turn a specific series of parts to change from one form to another.
Bobzeaux 4 years ago
it would be impossible to make a toy version of this, unless it was a life size scale toy because there is just too many moving pieces for a little toy.Bear in mind that there are 10,108 moving parts as he transforms.
Xsubs 3 years ago
actually, there is a way to do this..just not in as complicated a way as shown here.
I only wish hasbro had thought of it though.
vincymon 3 years ago
That's what I've always thought too. They needed to make physical models first, then copy those into the computer. They'd make something far more practical and thus more realistic, and maybe Jazz would have been able to survive being torn in half since they would discover that his torso is made of two different pieces, which would NOT kill him of they were separated.
Bobzeaux 3 years ago
Come to think of it, they probably did make physical models, but they just haven't mentioned about it.
Xsubs 3 years ago
Something this needlessly intricate couldn't possibly have been based on something physical.
Bobzeaux 3 years ago
also these are just rough 3d transformation studies according to Ben Procter in his website. Therefore they obviously dont need to make models.
Xsubs 3 years ago
what do you mean 'floating'? this is just an animation showing where each piece goes.
4718253 4 years ago
I mean floating.
Look at Prime's legs. Nothing is attached to anything here. :S
watch?v=u6EdGgTzMck
watch?v=tZC7MS4qsK4
Bobzeaux 4 years ago
because its just a simple animation. its not even the final render.
4718253 4 years ago
It doesn't need to be the final render. The idea is to simulate something that is supposed to happen in the real world, but this animation is physically impossible even in the context of a scifi flick.
Bobzeaux 4 years ago
not nessecarily, in the distant future things such as these could be made.
psycholian 4 years ago
lol WHAT?
guanqiaohang 4 years ago
i try to reply to someone and my message gets up here
psycholian 4 years ago
sorry?.... o.O
guanqiaohang 4 years ago
cool
squirly 4 years ago
clip clip clip :) but anyways it shure took weeks to model, it looks very detailed ... it could be a study for the animators maybe ..
i agree on the transformations in the new movie ... it kinda looks cool but its glassclear that this could not be done in real world ... they should have made it more "classic" ... i mean that optimus prime is a joke ... thats not optimus prime :)
basslinegenerator 4 years ago
Is this Maya ?
Vikramthewhite 4 years ago
That part with the legs seems impossible to do,plus I didn't really see that in the movie
CodenameLegacy 4 years ago
wow that was cool
ermonski 4 years ago
They made the transformations to difficult. Basicly they just sliding the parrts anywhere they want.
Hepathos 4 years ago
actually, the transformations were figured out by mathematical equations, so it worked right. if you look at the G1 transformations, they look really wierd, and those are the ones that don't really look right.
BlueMajesty94 4 years ago
Stop motion videos made with actual Transformer toys looks more right than this.
Bobzeaux 4 years ago 2
alot of clipping going on
gabman6 4 years ago
look at the foot, how could that be? the bottom half of the rear truck flips to the front and then recess back into the leg
lpyyxw 4 years ago
hm..no wonder they cudn't build an exact toy for it, that looks impossible
vincymon 4 years ago
what cg program is this
sly42cooperbeast 4 years ago