Gravitational Propultion Inertia Manipulation

[astrotometry]

Due to the spin entanglement, Einsetien's conceived of gravity as being necessarily "tele-paralle" with coincident electromagnetism. The flaw the unified field theory and relativity is that they try to qualify time as a single continuum, and displacement in space as linear. If instead you consider three spatial axes for the propagation of an electron, wherein the interference of it's carrier determines it's next position, gravity emerges as aggregate force due to dynamics of density gradients.

[WaiteDavidMSPhysics]

@astrotometry

Which unification theory? First you have to demonstrate that a flaw exists before you can suggest remidies. Relativity nowhere restricts dispacements to linear cases. Not even special relativity does this in formulation of particle dynamics.

[astrotometry]

I was referring to Einstein's unfinished goal of unifying gravity and electromagnetism. To my knowledge, no theory exists which indicates a method to counteract gravity. For EM unification, a way to transform EMF into a change in gravitation. Alternately, a theory to demonstrate why it's not possible to achieve such a transformation. It's not a flaw per se, more of a limitation. The concept of inertial propulsion is very cool, there may be an exception for the 3rd law in there somewhere.

[WaiteDavidMSPhysics]

@astrotometry

His goal wasn't unfinished. It just never became a mainstream unification theory because it wasn't a quantum field theory and didn't include unification of the strong and weak forces. In Einstein's unification electromagnitism is dirived as a consequence of an antisymetric metric tensor. The field equations that result from his Lagrangian density yield Maxwell's curl equations.

[WaiteDavidMSPhysics]

@astrotometry

Newtonian laws only apply to cases of physics that can be approximated as a Newtonian limit. There are gerneral relativistic analogs of the laws, but the third law generalization isn' t violated here. Newtonian dynamics 3rd law is, but that doesn't matter because we are discussing a more general realm of physics.

[astrotometry]

@WaiteDavidMSPhysics But even when relativistic movement is considered, that movement is always considered as a two dimensional vector, is it not? From one relativistic point to another?

[WaiteDavidMSPhysics]

@astrotometry

No its not. U is a four dimentional vector and applies to arbitrary dynamics both for special relativity and general relativity. You're confusing the special relativistic relationship between two observers relative motion with the description of a particle's dynamics according to a given observer. In general relativity even the observer motion is arbitrary.